calveley today - microsoft

14

CALVELEY TODAY The parish of Calveley still retains much of its rural character although, as in many places throughout the UK, this is under threat from both commercial and residential development. Of the 107 houses in the parish, roughly half of these are concentrated along the A51 which runs along the southern boundary. The majority of these are clustered around the site of what was Calveley Railway Station. These include a relatively new development of houses built in the 1990s, known as The Chantry and Gowy Court. The rest of the houses are scattered along the “back lanes”. The majority of houses within the parish are well maintained and many have been altered and extended. All of the houses are in private ownership.

The 2011 census identified a population of 280 living in Calveley. Of these 64 (22.8%) are aged 0-19 and 44 (15.7%) are aged 64+. Recent times have seen an increase in the number of people who travel to work outside the parish and the immediate area. A primary school is located in a rural setting on the back lanes. Calveley Primary School provides first stage education for children from the parish and the surrounding area. Set in a predominantly Victorian building, the school has been much extended and modernised in recent times. This is a small school with five Teachers and four Teaching Assistants. The intake for 2013 academic year was 11 pupils giving a total attendance of 92 children. Numbers fluctuate at Calveley School in response to local changes in population profile. Calveley Hall Chapel (C of E) (known locally as Calveley Church) provides the only licensed place of religious in the Parish. It is a “daughter church” to St. Boniface in Bunbury and holds services twice per month.

15

The Alpraham and Calveley Reading Room continues to provide a village hall facility for both parishes, however, this shared building is nearing the end of its useful life. Happily, the trust that looks after this wooden building is planning a new, modern replacement. It is hoped that work may start soon.

The majority of land in the parish continues to be given over to farming, the principle use being dairy. However, the number of working farms has reduced in recent times from eleven to seven. In some cases redundant farm buildings have been converted to dwellings in common with many areas throughout Cheshire. A small number of businesses have been established in Calveley in recent times including an auto repair company, a turkey egg export “farm”, a petrol station with a convenience store, a

coal yard and most recently a retail store serving the farming and equestrian community. A public house, situated on the A51, The Davenport Arms, once offered food and drink but although the building still stands this amenity has recently ceased to trade. The Shropshire Union Canal borders the south western corner of the parish and is very popular with boaters. There is a boat servicing facility situated in a 19th century warehouse, operated by the Canal and Rivers Trust. Calveley’s location on the A51 and close proximity to the motorways ensures excellent connectivity to a number of nearby centres that provide significant employment opportunities including Manchester, Chester, Crewe, Liverpool and Stoke-on Trent. A regular bus service connects Calveley to Nantwich, Crewe and Chester. There are fast rail links from Crewe to Birmingham, London , Liverpool and Manchester and also the airports for the latter two cities. The area is well served by comprehensive rail and road networks. Consequently, Calveley has become a popular place for commuters to live.

16

THE FUTURE

Calveley is a rural area and there are no major developments planned for the area covered by the Plan in the immediate future. The responses to the two community questionnaires show that some housing development is supported for affordable housing in particular, and mostly for small numbers of houses spread out around the community area. However, the results highlight that the Parish should retain its current character.

Calveley is divided by the A51, a main arterial route. Many of the issues raised relate to the effect on the quality of life of local inhabitants by the amount and nature of the traffic travelling along this route and through the adjoining lanes. One of the consequences of the amount of traffic along the main road has been the demise of any local shops and there is no identifiable village centre or community base within the village. The local school and the church remain the current focal points and may present opportunities for wider community use. The responses to the questionnaire confirm there is a desire for a village centre which validates the need to explore any potential for improved local facilities within the area covered by the Community Plan. The responses also demonstrate that in order to improve the quality of life there is a need to address the pressures put on the parish and surrounding community by the A51. Though the need for improvement has been identified, there is no desire to change the nature and character of the Community.

17

Efforts are being made to secure a new building to replace the Reading Room on an alternative site to provide better facilities for the Community. Unexpected difficulties have delayed its construction but it is hoped that the matter will be resolved soon.

Whilst outside the area covered by the Plan, development of the Wardle Airfield site will bring with it job opportunities. Overall the Calveley Community is not opposed to the 13,500 sq mtr of employment related development (which recently received outline planning permission). A recent traffic assessment has estimated that it will increase the amount of traffic travelling along the A51 through Calveley by 25% at peak times. This will undoubtedly have an impact on those living in the vicinity of the A51 and also put even more pressure on the back lanes as a cut through and diversion route, particularly in the event of an incident on the main road. Included within the development are proposals for a weight limit along Calveley Hall Lane, which may assist somewhat, but traffic calming measures and speed restrictions remain to be addressed.

There is considerable support for the station to reopen and for a bypass around the village and these remain longer term aims for the community.

18

Calveley School was graded as “Good” in its OFSTED inspection which took place in May 2014. The report highlighted the Head Teacher’s management of teaching and learning as “Outstanding” and described the Governance of the school as a significant strength. As well as playing a large part in the local community the school’s future includes development of the current informal partnership with Acton School in Nantwich which delivers both economies of scale and the opportunity to share best practice. The school will now build on its success to date in its aspiration to be outstanding in all aspects.

19

THE QUESTIONNAIRE

The Action Plan has been drawn up based on responses from the people of the community to the questionnaires that were delivered to every household. There were two questionnaires, the first being issued in October 2012. The questions included were derived from a series of open meetings that were held over a period of time. The meetings comprised a general discussion that identified the issues most important to the people who attended. The results of the first questionnaire were analysed and used to compile the more detailed and focused second questionnaire in December 2013. This was again delivered to every household, together with a brief summary of the earlier results. The Working Group developed the Action Plan included in this document. This concentrates on the various issues raised by the community and provides responses and tangible actions that will be taken.

20

THE ACTION PLAN The information provided by the community via the two questionnaires has formed the basis for the “Action Plan” shown on the following pages. The plan refers to the questions asked, the responses received from the community and the various actions to be taken in order to achieve the required objectives. The plan also outlines the “measure for success” and a realistic time frame to achieve this. The measure for success is intended to provide a tangible goal that can be worked towards. An “owner” is also identified for each objective who will hold the issue in question and take forward the necessary actions in order to achieve the required goal. The majority of goals included within the plan refer to improvements over what already exists in our community. Much of the work required will have to be taken forward in conjunction with the Parish Council, infrastructure providers and similar bodies. The Action Plan is intended to be a “live document” meaning that work will continue and be on-going. As goals are achieved, other issues will be identified and possibly added as they are raised by the community. The Working Group intends to issue updates on progress, measured against the plan. It is intended that these will be communicated to the community via the Parish Notice Boards and the Community Web Based Notice Board and Parish Magazines The Working Group hope that this document will give the people of Calveley a voice and allow them to understand more about what can be achieved with everybody working together for the benefit of the Community now and for its future.

21

QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS AND ACTION PLAN

Issue Questionnaire Results Analysis Action Time

Frame Measure for Success Resource Task Owner

Q1 Would you like to have a village centre?

Yes No N/A N/R

55 14 20 2

There was high response rate to this question with the majority liking the idea of a village centre.

To explore what sites may be appropriate and their availability.

12 months to come back with a report.

Production of a Feasibility Study

Time CEC

AW CK RD

Q2 (a) If available would you use: a) Local shop b) Pub c) Post Office d) Meeting Room e) Outdoor leisure space (including children’s play area)

Yes No N/V} N/A} Yes No N/V} N/A} Yes No N/V} N/A} Yes No N/V} N/A} Yes No N/V} N/A}

82 3 4 3

52 14 12 2

79 3 3 2

35 17 15 5

35 25

10 4

All of these amenities are given support with the outdoor leisure space being the least supported.

Links in with Question 1 above.

Time CEC

MG

22



Q2(b) The Davenport Arms is currently for sale – if it was possible to purchase the property by some means to provide some or all of the above amenities would you support the venture?

Yes No N/V

58 11 22

Majority would support the venture. However, the property has now been purchased and the new owners are intending to carry out a feasibility study in order to decide what to do with the property.

To be determined

Time CEC

AW CK RD

Q3(a) Adoption of shared private sewage system by United Utilities.

Yes No N/A N/R

16 17 53 5

Less than half households are affected. Half of those affected would like action.

The Working Group to contact affected householders via the website with a view to setting up an Action Group of residents who are dissatisfied with the existing United Utilities service.

12 weeks

Householders have received comprehensive information to allow them to proceed.

Time UU

MG

Q3(b) I am happy with the shared private sewerage system that currently serves my home.

Yes No N/V} N/A}

32 8 51

A very small proportion of households have an issue. These are likely to be neighbour to neighbour issues/disputes.

Direct action will need to be by Householder. The Working Group could contact United Utilities, identify contacts and options available. Inform householders of contacts and options available.

12 weeks

As above

Time UU

MG

Q4(a) Is the quality of water that you receive at your address satisfactory?

Yes No N/V

81 6 4

A very small number of households have an issue. We do not know if these are grouped together or scattered.

Contact local manager for United Utilities. Agree a programme of sampling by UU to ensure no variation across the community. If there is variation press UU to remedy and re-sample.

12 months

United Utilities demonstrate uniformity across community.

Time UU

MG

23



Q4(b) Is the pressure of the water supply at your address satisfactory?

Yes No N/V

78 12 1

A small number of households have an issue. Pressure issues are less subjective than quality. We suspect that problem households might be grouped.

As above, and householders invited to contact the Community Plan Working Group via the website if there is a problem with the water pressure.

12 months

As above

Time UU

MG

Q4(c) Are you satisfied with the continuity (limited interruptions) of your water supply?

Yes No N/V N/R

84 1 5 1

Only one household reported dissatisfaction.

No action to be taken.

Q5 Would you like your home/premises to be connected to a mains gas supply?

Yes No N/V

52 35 4

A substantial number of respondents would like to be connected to a mains gas supply .

Identify where gas mains are currently located and what is planned. Liaise with Cheshire East and gas provider to explore options and time frame for extending gas network. Explore the impact of Wardle Development as a possible inducement to BG for network expansion.

12 months

Deliver a clear strategy with time frame that shows how and where the network may be extended.

Time CEC BG

MG

Q6(a) Does the electricity supply to your address fluctuate unduly?

Yes No N/V

22 62 7

Less than one quarter of respondents reported a problem. However, given the variation in supply method across the community it is probable that these respondents are located in the back lanes areas with overhead power supplies.

Contact infrastructure provider and report the problem. Request a survey of all overhead/ underground cables to identify problems. If/when problems are identified agree an action plan to remedy. Review remedy when advised complete.

3 months 12 months 18 months

Obtain key contract information and obtain response confirming action being taken. Survey completed and action plan issued Review satisfaction via Community Website and confirm completion.

Time BT

MG

24



Q6(b) Is the electricity supply to your address interrupted unduly?

Yes No N/V

18 56 7

Slightly fewer respondents reported a problem with interruption than fluctuation.

Combine investigation, action and remedy with 6(a) above.

As above

As above

Time

MG

Q7(a) Are you satisfied with your landline telephone service in terms of connectivity and interruption?

Yes No N/V

73 11 7

A small number of respondents experience problems. These are possibly associated with the ageing overhead supplies along the back lanes.

Identify where problems are being experienced. Investigate if there is a pattern or common theme. Engage with BT engineers to secure a remedy. Check levels of satisfaction once complete.

12 weeks 4 weeks 6 months

Marked-up plan showing locations. Marked-up plan from BT engineers that all lines have showing cable routes. Confirmation been tested and repaired or replaced.

Time BT

MG

Q8(b) Are you satisfied with the speed and degree of interruption that you experience when connected to the internet via broadband?

Yes No N/R

28 54 5

A large number of recipients are dissatisfied with their broadband service. A programme of introducing a fibre network to Cheshire East is underway. This may not reach everyone on the back lanes. Wettenhall telephone exchange is also due to be upgraded to improve connectivity to users who will not benefit from fibre.

Circulate updates of fibre network installation to all residents. Review levels of satisfaction when new fibre network is complete in our area. Four levels of dissatisfaction remain high – arrange a meeting with Cheshire East and BT and agree strategy.

3 months 6 months 9 months 12 months

All residents with access to the internet confirm receipt. Response received – online questionnaire. Meeting date confirmed.

Time BT

MG

25



Q9 Are you satisfied with the provision of surface water drains on the roads in Calveley and the way in which they are maintained?

Yes No N/V

32 43 16

Nearly half of respondents confirmed dissatisfaction. This is a significant number prompted possibly by localised flooding events.

Obtain Cheshire East engineer’s drawing showing locations. Review each location and take a view on if they are problematic. Contact nearby householder and confirm problem (or investigate via website). Meet with engineer and secure action Plan. Review locations and report.

3 months 2 months 1 month 2 months

Drawing obtained. Schedule of problem drains compiled. Plan secured Drains (road gulley) attended to and regular maintenance plan formalised.

Time CEC

MG

Q10 Would you like to see greater focus and stricter controls on the use of private external lighting?

Yes No N/ V

19 38 34

Twice as many respondents did not want action taken than those who did.

The overwhelming number of respondents has indicated that they do not want action to be taken by the Working Group. On this basis no action can be taken at this time. However it is felt by the Group that this situation may change when development of the new Wardle Employment Park commences. The Working Group will keep this item under regular review and action will be taken when there is a clear mandate to do so.

12 months

Residents Review

Time

MG

26



Q11 Are you happy with the provision of pavements in the parish and their standard of maintenance? If you ticked No is this because: a) there should be more pavements b) the pavements should be wider c) the standard of pavement maintenance d) the standard of pavement cleanliness

Yes No N/V Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No

26 39 26

28 5

22 3

17 7

13 8

Of those dissatisfied, a majority felt that there should be more pavements and wider. Some – less than half highlighted concerns with the cleanliness and maintenance of pavements. Various locations were suggested for additional pavements, including adjacent to the school , A51 junction Long Lane, Calveley Green Lane and Calveley Hall Lane and wider pavements by bus stops. A number of people suggested the pavement should be extended up to Wardle Filling Station, possible upgrading of tow path?

Contact Cheshire East regarding their maintenance programme. Working Group to put together a report on what is wrong and what needs to be done with regard to the pavements Contact Cheshire East. Contact Cheshire East and Canal and River Trust to discuss possible upgrading of tow path. In the hands of the Parish Council

12 weeks 24 weeks 12 weeks 12 months

Securing satisfactory action by Cheshire East Obtaining Parish Compact to hire a lengthsman

Time CEC PC

MG

27



Q12 Are you happy with the maintenance of the roadside verges provided by Cheshire East? .

Yes No N/V

30 50 11

More than half of respondents are dissatisfied. This indicates the perception of the poor standard of maintenance generally on the back lanes. This is exacerbated by a number of issues:

• Increased use of back lanes as a ‘rat run’

• increased use by agricultural plant and machinery where farms are now made up of separated parcels of land

• reluctance of farmers, landowners and contractors to recognise their responsibility for clearing away mud caused by them

• Increased size of agricultural machinery

• Increased traffic generally and especially delivery vehicles

Objectives are:

• deter none access traffic

• slow traffic down

• provide recognisable passing places

• protect remaining soft verges

• ensure farm workers and

contractors clear away mud These issues have to be addressed with Cheshire East Highways Draw up draft outline proposal/action plan Meet with Cheshire East and agree time scale for plan formalisation. Obtain budget commitment. Finalise working plan with Cheshire East Tender and implement

10 weeks 4 weeks 12 weeks 18 months

Prepared scheme for back lane improvement Commitment from Cheshire East to produce working plan and budget Scheme available for tender Passing places, signage, etc in place

Time Drawings Printing Time Time and CEC costs Time

MG

28



Q12 continued....... Are you happy with the maintenance of the roadside verges provided by Cheshire East?

• Increased speed of

traffic and refusal by some drivers to give way causing vehicles to mount what is left of soft verges

Farmers implement mud clearance.

6 months (from start)

No mud on back lanes

Highways’ budget Time

Q13 Are you happy with the degree of litter clearance that is carried out by Cheshire East?

Yes No N/V N/R

42

34 15 1

Majority were satisfied

Contact Cheshire East regarding their litter clearance programme. Discuss with Calveley Parish Council re organising a community litter collection day.

12 weeks 4 weeks

No further complaints

Time CEC PC

AW

14(a) Are you happy with the waste collection service and attention to recycling provided by Cheshire East Council?

Yes No N/V

74 13 4


No further action at this time

AW

14(b) Are you happy with the waste disposal recycling centres provided by Cheshire East Council?

Yes No N/V

65 6 18


No further action at this time

AW

29



Q15 Participation of a Good Neighbour Scheme

Yes No U/S N/A

61 8 17 5

More than half of the residents would volunteer if a Good Neighbour Scheme was established.

Advertise the Scheme on the website with contact information. Appoint a Good Neighbour Co-ordinator Revisit questionnaires and contact those who volunteered, ascertain availability of those residents. Allocate volunteer to resident in need based on data collected. To use the Church ‘Link@ magazine’ to highlight the fact that we have a website and a Good Neighbour Scheme.

12 weeks

Feedback from those using the scheme Feedback from volunteers on the practicality of the tasks they undertake

Time Stationery

JK

Q16(a) Do you regularly look at the notice boards in Calveley?

Yes No

29 57

Approximately half of recipients who replied look at the notice board on the A51. It is reasonable to deduce that these recipients live close to this notice board. Approximately one third of recipients look at the notice board outside the school. These are most likely parents collecting children from the school gate.

It is unlikely that people in the community make a special journey on a regular basis to view the notice boards. The disparate nature of the households in the area has resulted in a community that struggles to share communication. It is clear that the notice boards are not suitable at this time as the only means of communication. The working group will investigate the issue in more depth and produce options for how this can be addressed and most likely by the introduction of a web based notice board. (See Below)

See 16(b)

See 16(b)

See16(b)

See16(b)

30



Q16(b) Do you feel that a Calveley Website, giving helpful advice for local people would be of interest to you?

Yes No

67 17

A majority of respondents believed that a community website would be beneficial.

Produce a website that is tailored to the needs of the community. Research experiences of other communities in order to learn from others.

6 months

A website is delivered to the community for the community to use. This will supplement the information provided on the existing notice boards which will continue to be used.

Time Funding

MG

Q17 Communication from Homewatch Scheme

Yes No N/A

35 55 1

Current Homewatch Scheme does not cover all residents.

Merge Calveley Central and Calveley Back Lanes Schemes into one Appoint Homewatch Co-ordinator Update current email database for electronic notification circulation Ascertain from questionnaires those residents not on email and organise paper version of notification to be issued Display all notifications received on website and parish notice boards.

12 weeks

Residents being kept up to date with Homewatch matters.

Time Stationery

JK

Q18(a) Are you happy with the postal delivery service received at your home or premises?

Yes No N/R

86 3 2

The majority of those who responded were happy with the postal service they receive. Comment was made on the wrong postcode allocation in Calveley Green Lane/Calveley Hall Lane.

Establish the position on changing postcode with Royal Mail and home Task Owners.

3 months

Current problems eliminated.

Time

PH RM

Q18(b) Are you happy with the location of post boxes in the village?

Yes No N/V}

80 4 7

The majority were happy with the location of the post boxes in the Calveley area. Of those not happy suggestions as to where else post boxes should be located included the school and the garage.

No action required

N/A

N/A

PH

31



Q19 Would you join a scheme for the bulk purchase of certain commodities whereby a cheaper price could be negotiated with suppliers?

Yes No N/V

80 4 7

The majority of residents would be interested in such a scheme. There are existing suppliers, information available on the website

Investigate opportunities with various suppliers, with a view to putting details on the website.

2 months

Defined list of suppliers. Householders take up contacts themselves.

Time

RD

Q 20 Do you use the 84 bus service between Crewe and Chester? Would you use a Dial a ride/ Taxi club type service?

Yes No Yes No

47 44

19 65

Few would support a dial a ride.

No Action

Q21 If the railway station at Calveley was reopened would you use it?

Yes No

68 23

The majority of respondents would use the station if it was re-opened but for this to happen we would need to show that a large number of people would use it.

In the future this may be considered in conjunction with Bunbury/Beeston Station in order to increase the catchment area and make it viable. This will be a long term project for further investigation. A Working Party will investigate with Cheshire East and RailTrack. This is an ambitious aim which could only be achieved in the future with political support .

Long term

To be determined

Time

JG

32



Q22(a), (b), (c), (d) Housing requirements

N/A

N/A

The population of Calveley is as follows: 10 years of age and under : 30 11-18 years of age : 16 Over 18 years of age : 120 Over 60 years of age : 60 At present very few local people are looking for alternative accommodation – the results show that 5 would prefer to buy locally and 3 to move to a more urban area. No-one is looking to rent locally. For the future 2 will need accommodation in 2 years, 4 within 5 years and 5 will be looking for accommodation within 10 years.

We have learned recently from Councillor Mike Jones that the official view of Cheshire East Council is that Calveley has “zero need for housing” (not to be confused with zero need locally), so each planning application to build new houses will be considered individually.

Long term

Maintain under review.

Time CEC

JG

Q23 (a), (b) New housing

0 <10 10-20 20-30 31-40 41-49 50 N/R

16 10 17 5 1 0 6 36

The results show that the majority of people who responded would be happy with some new houses in Calveley with a preference for the developments to be scattered and to utilise brownfield sites rather than agricultural land.

We have learned recently from Councillor Mike Jones that the official view of Cheshire East council is that Calveley has “Zero need for housing” (not to be confused with zero need locally), so each planning application to build new houses would be considered individually.

Long term

Time CEC

JG

Q24 Does the reduction in street lighting on the A51 adversely affect you?

Yes No

33 56

Less than half of respondents felt that the current reduction in street lighting affected them. However, because this issue is one of safety the working group feels that it should be investigated more fully and if possible a solution found.

Raise the issue with both the Parish Council and Cheshire East Council and involve Highway engineers. Agree a course of action that will satisfy local people’s concerns and the objectives of Cheshire East. Alter the lighting regime on the A51


Confirmation from Cheshire East that the issue is being investigated Publish how the lighting is to be amended Lighting is amended

Time CEC PC

AW

33



Q25 Do you think a pedestrian crossing on the A51 in Calveley would be of benefit?

Yes No

44 37

More than half of the respondents were in favour of a crossing and comments received regarding locations suggested access to bus stops and adjacent to The Davenport Arms This location which also links the north/south parish footpath to the canal towpath (east/west) is considered to be the most appropriate for the community.

Present a clear message to the Parish Council and Cheshire East that the community want a safe pedestrian crossing on the A51 to ink both parts of the community. Engage with CEC highways to develop a deliverable scheme for the most appropriate type of crossing in the most beneficial location. Secure funding. Engage with The Canals and Rivers Trust to explore ways of improving the the existing towpath along the canal to deliver a usable cycleway and footpath to link Calveley and the proposed development at Wardle. Contractor secured and crossing is installed.

3 months 3 months 6 months 3 months 12 months

Acknowledgment by Cheshire East to the Parish Council that they will work towards providing a viable scheme. Deliverable scheme produced and priced. CEC confirm funding Canal and Rivers Trust provides a working scheme with budget. A51 Safe to cross

Time CEC PC

RD

Q26( a) What effect do you feel the 30mph limit along the A51 in Calveley has had on i) speed ii ) traffic volume?

Speed Pos Neg Vol Pos Neg

73 18

12 39

There were mixed views on the benefits of the 30mph limit on the A51 with 80% saying it had had a positive effect on speed but 65% of the view that it had increased traffic volume.

No action required at this stage. Any traffic volume increases will identified through future traffic monitoring.

Ongoing

Time

PH

34



Q26(b) Would you support further speed restriction controls on the A51 such as average speed cameras?

Yes No N/V

45

40 6

Opinion was divided on the need for further speed restrictions on the A51.

Continue to feed in information to relevant bodies. An A51 Pressure Group has been set up and the Working Party will make them aware of the information provided by Calveley residents

3 months

An Action Plan produced by the A51 Pressure Group – the residents requests will be taken on board in their Action Plan

Time Pressure Group

PH

Q26(c) Would you support speed restricting methods in the Lanes?

Yes No N/R

59 25 6

Over half of respondents were in favour of restrictions in the lanes, particularly in Calveley Hall Lane, Long Lane and in the vicinity of Calveley Primary School.

To ensure Cheshire East implement the conditions attached to the Wardle Airfield planning application. Explore the potential for greater restrictions with Cheshire East Highways Department. (See also Question 12)

12 months

Delivery of ‘gateway’ features and speed restrictions set up in the back lanes.

CEC PC

PH

Q26(d) What do you consider should be the appropriate speed limit past Calveley School?

Mph 10 20 30 40 N/C N/R

4

49 28 4 4 3

Most people supported either a 20 or 30 mph speed limit past Calveley School.

Consult with Calveley Head teacher re the current position re restriction past the school. Explore the potential for greater restrictions with Cheshire East Highways Department

1 month 6 months 12 months

Obtain information on current position Identify possible options. Enforceable speed restrictions in place.

Time CEC School

PH

35



Q27 Should there be a restriction of heavy goods vehicles entering the Lanes, except for access?

Yes No N/V

83 4 4

There was a great deal of support for a restriction on heavy goods vehicles using the lanes with the majority of people in favour and only a few against.

This is an issue for Cheshire East Highways but may be included as part of the Wardle Development. Establish current position re the development and this issue. Progress with Cheshire East Highways to ensure the conditions attached to the Wardle Airfield Develop ment are implemented.

3 months 6 months Dependent on start of Wardle Site

Clarification of conditions attached to the Wardle Airfield planning application Clear plan of action agreed Weight restriction signs in place

Time CEC

PH

Q28 Do you consider traffic lights at the end of Station Road would be of benefit to the community?

Yes No N/R

35 42 14

Less than half of respondents thought this would be a good idea giving no clear mandate for further action.

See Q29 and Q25. Although there is no clear mandate, further action relating to traffic lights at the end of Station Road and Long Lane, further investigation is to take place concerning this area and the possibility of installing a pedestrian crossing in conjunction with Cheshire East Council and Highways.

Long term 18 months

Clear decision

Time CEC

JG

36



Q29 Do you consider that traffic lights at the end of Long Lane would be of benefit to the community?

Yes No N/R

45 42 4

Half of respondents thought this would be a good idea.

This is in Alpraham Parish Council’s area and therefore not the responsibility of Calveley. This issue will be passed to Alpraham Parish Council.

Q30 Would you support the creation of a Calveley/Alpraham by-pass?

Yes No N/V

61 22 7

The creation of a by-pass around the Calveley area received support in principle by 67% of those who responded. 24% were not in favour of a by-pass.

This is a long term aim with progress being made through the A51 Steering group which is being set up by Cllr Jones and involves the relevant Parish Councils. This will be progressed through the Parish Council?

10 – 20 years

Agreement to by-pass being necessary.

PC CEC

AW

Q31 (a), (b) Participation in further education opportunities

Yes No N/A

47 43 1

Approximately half of all residents would participate in further education activities.

Liaise with Cheshire East Local Area Partnership Manager to ascertain what is needed Contact various locations in a 2/3 mile radius to assess suitability for classes to be held or ascertain what classes are currently held and encourage advertising availability. Display classes on website/notice boards or via email to ascertain interest. Update the website with information available. Investigate opportunities with Cavleley Primary School, advertising their facilities for classes.

12 months

Classes being held in local buildings within distance of Calveley

Time LAP School

JK

37



Q32 (a) What type of employment is needed in the area?

Over half of residents suggested that Agriculture and skilled labour Apprenticeships were needed in the area.

Forward results to relevant bodies in Cheshire East Suggest that these figures should be given consideration when planning applications for new businesses are received Encourage local businesses to review their employment needs and advertise on our website/local press/notice boards

12 months

Local companies advertising for Apprentices Cheshire East using our plans to support development of business in the area

Time

JK

Q 33(b) Would you utilise existing local contractors if a central list was held?

Yes No Poss N/R

83 1 1 4

Majority would use such a list.

Opportunity for local contractors to place businesses on list is available on website Accomplished but need to highlight possibility with local contractors.

PH

Q 33(c) Where would you like to see local start up businesses located?

No consensus of opinion although there was a general view that any new business should be in Wardle.

Ongoing review.

Awareness of responses when applications arise with Cheshire East

PC

PC

Supplemental Development of Calveley Design Statement

N/A

N/A

Suggested to be addressed by the Leader of Cheshire East Council

Establish a Working Group. Research and involve community by consultation. Produce and publish a Design Statement


Regular meetings established Questionnaires issued and analysed Document agreed with Cheshire East Planning and accepted

Time Time Time

MG MG MG

N/A – Not applicable CEC – Cheshire East Council PC –Calveley Parish Council RD – R Dawson PH – P Holding N/R – No response UU – United Utilities RM – Royal Mail MG – M Gregory JK – J Kenwright N/V – No view BG – British Gas LAP – Local Area Partnership JG – Joy Greenway AW – A Waterhouse N/C – No change BT – British Telecom CK – C Konieczny

38

WHERE WE GO FROM HERE

The production of the plan is by no means the end of the exercise. The working group will produce a formal report on progress made against the planned objectives to the Parish Council and the residents every six months. This will identify not only achievements but also difficulties encountered in order that lessons learned may be shared. The working group will work closely with the parish council in order to present a unified approach which will result in better outcomes for the people of Calveley.

This is a time of change and Calveley is not insulated against the negative effects that this can bring. Aggressive development and inappropriate levels of road traffic are constant threats and these are just some of the issues which must not be ignored. As new issues are identified the plan will be modified to include them and action taken as necessary. The production of the plan has shown that the people of Calveley do have a voice and demonstrates what can be achieved when the community works together.

The Calveley community plan is a rolling document and present members of the group would welcome offers of assistance from the community or to join the planning group. If you are interested please contact the Clerk, Sue Stockton, email - [email protected] : phone -01829 260167.

mailto:[email protected]

calveley today - microsoft

Documents