camille kandiko, indiana university bloomington jon acker and william fendley, the university of...

22
Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at Dallas The National Survey of Student Engagement: Promoting Assessment & Accountability in Higher Education

Upload: leonard-garey-higgins

Post on 29-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington

Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama

Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at Dallas

The National Survey of Student Engagement:

Promoting Assessment & Accountability in Higher Education

Presentation Overview

The National Survey of Student Engagement

Institutional Perspectives The University of Alabama The University of Texas at Dallas

Questions and Discussion

Two Components of Student Engagement

What institutions do -- using effective educational practices to induce students to do the right things

What students do -- time and energy devoted to educationally purposeful activities

What is the National Survey of Student Engagement?

(pronounced “nessie”)

A college student survey that assesses the extent to which students engage in educational practices associated with high levels of learning and development

A way to refocus conversation about college quality

NSSE Items

Student Behaviors in College

Institutional Actions & Requirements

Student Reactions to College

Student BackgroundInformation

Related to Student Learning &

Development

Institutional Actions & Requirements

NSSE Survey Administration

National Survey of Student Engagement

Third Party Administration Random Sample of First-year

& Senior Students Spring Semester Administration Modes:

Paper Web-only Web +

FSSE Survey Designed to compliment

NSSE undergraduate survey Faculty perceptions of student

engagement Importance faculty place on

various areas of learning and development

Nature and frequency of faculty-student interactions

How faculty members organize class time

Catalyst for productive discussions related to teaching and learning

Launched in 2004 with over 20,000 faculty from 132 institutions In 2005, approximately 20,000 faculty at 109 colleges and

universities completed the survey

BCSSE Survey Based on numerous requests

over the years for pre-college controls

Measures first-year students’ expectations for college and selected high school experiences

Ability to combine with spring NSSE data for pre- and post-look at first-year experience

Second pilot in Fall 2005 with an estimated 75 institutions

NSSE Project Scope

Half of the participating institutions in self-selected consortia 50 states, D.C., the Virgin Islands & Puerto Rico

Canada, Italy, Lebanon, Japan, Macedonia Sent surveys to over 700,000 students annually

Project Year Colleges & Universities

NSSE 2003 437

NSSE 2004 473

NSSE 2005 529

NSSE 2006 560 (in progress)

NSSE Institutional Report Overview

Institutional student data

Means summary report

Frequency distribution

First-year students vs. seniors

Comparative data for same Carnegie type, peer group or consortium, and national

National benchmark data (available in November)

National Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice

Level of Academic Challenge

Active & Collaborative

Learning

EnrichingEducational Experiences

SupportiveCampus

Environment

StudentFaculty Interaction

NSSE developed five indicators, or benchmarks, to represent the multi-dimensional nature of student engagement at the institutional, sector, and national levels

Using NSSE Data

Institutions share data with a variety of audiences internally in order to extend the conversation about student engagement throughout their campuses.

In 2005, institutions shared their data with presidents, department chairs, academic advisors, faculty, governing boards, and students.

Using NSSE Data

Institutions share data with external audiences in order to refocus the conversation on college quality on state, regional, and national levels.

In 2004, institutions shared data with accreditation agencies, media, prospective students, parents, and alumni.

The University of Alabama

For SACS re-affirmation developed a Quality Enhancement Plan that focuses on improving student learning.

Used feedback from the NSSE survey and saw that the lowest score (and greatest opportunity for improvement) was in active and collaborative learning among first-year students.

UA uses NSSE data during self- assessment to identify areas to focus on improvement to drive the Quality Enhancement Plan.

The University of Alabama

UA developed a QEP strategy around using active and collaborative learning to enhance student learning in first-year courses. The initiative focuses on introducing active and collaborative learning methods in large lecture classes.

At present, UA is endeavoring to identify which classes employ active and collaborative learning activities and which classes do not.

University of Texas at Dallas

Student satisfaction is an outcome measure of the educational experience. Legislation passed in 1999 in the 76th session of the Texas Legislature requires that all state agencies and public universities address customer satisfaction.

To help meet this mandate, U. T. System participates in (NSSE).

Use of NSSE in UT System The University of Texas System is committed to providing

opportunities for access to and success in high-quality, affordable higher education for students from a wide range of social, ethnic, cultural, and economic backgrounds.

Evaluation by first-year students of academic advising as “good” or “excellent” increased from 2003 to 2004 at U. T. Austin, U. T. Brownsville/TSC, U. T. Dallas, and U. T. Permian Basin.

Dissemination: Potential NSSE Roadmap

Step #1: Survey Data

• Survey Students• Review Results• Develop Preliminary

List of Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement

Step #2: Feedback

• Share results with Faculty, Administrators & Students

• Identify Themes & Priorities

• Design Action Plan

Step #2: Feedback

• Share results with Faculty, Administrators & Students

• Identify Themes & Priorities

• Design Action PlanStep #3: Action Plan

• Finalize Plan• Share Plan with

Appropriate Groups• Link to Strategic

Plan• Implement Action

Step #4: Follow-up

• Use Results as Benchmarks to Monitor Progress

• Faculty & Student Focus Groups

Step #4: Follow-up

• Use Results as Benchmarks to Monitor Progress

• Faculty & Student Focus Groups

How can your campus get involved?NSSE

www.nsse.iub.edu

812.856.5824

Questions and Discussion

The National Survey of Student Engagement: Promoting Assessment & Accountability in Higher

EducationCamille Kandiko, NSSE Project Associate

([email protected])

William Fendley, The University of Alabama ([email protected])

John Acker, The University of Alabama

([email protected])

Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at Dallas ([email protected])