camilo garcia cely, ulb · 2017. 10. 6. · camilo garcia cely, ulb self-interacting dark matter...
TRANSCRIPT
From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB
Self-interacting Dark Matter WorkshopCopenhagen, Denmark
The Neils Bohr International Academy
August 3rd, 2017
In collaboration with N. Bernal, X. Chu, T. Hambye and B. ZaldivarBased on JCAP 1603 (2016) no.03, 018 and arXiv:1708.xxxxx
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
1 Motivation: Self-interacting DM without light mediators
2 Spin-1 case
3 Spin-2 case
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
How to produce self-interacting DM
Solution to small-scale problems: σSImDM∼ 0.1− 10 cm2/g
σSI ∼ 1011-1013 pb for mDM ∼ 1 GeV
If σvannihilation ∼ 1 pb : ΩDMh2 ∼ 0.1 (WIMP miracle)
If σvannihilation ∼ σSI : ΩDMh2 1
One option
Keep pb cross sections in the Early Universe but enhance theinteractions in DM halos today
Invoke a light mediator and consider non-perturbative effects
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
How to produce self-interacting DM
Solution to small-scale problems: σSImDM∼ 0.1− 10 cm2/g
σSI ∼ 1011-1013 pb for mDM ∼ 1 GeV
If σvannihilation ∼ 1 pb : ΩDMh2 ∼ 0.1 (WIMP miracle)
If σvannihilation ∼ σSI : ΩDMh2 1
One option
Keep pb cross sections in the Early Universe but enhance theinteractions in DM halos today
Invoke a light mediator and consider non-perturbative effects
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
How to produce self-interacting DM
Solution to small-scale problems: σSImDM∼ 0.1− 10 cm2/g
σSI ∼ 1011-1013 pb for mDM ∼ 1 GeV
If σvannihilation ∼ 1 pb : ΩDMh2 ∼ 0.1 (WIMP miracle)If σvannihilation ∼ σSI : ΩDMh2 1
One option
Keep pb cross sections in the Early Universe but enhance theinteractions in DM halos today
Invoke a light mediator and consider non-perturbative effects
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
How to produce self-interacting DM
Solution to small-scale problems: σSImDM∼ 0.1− 10 cm2/g
σSI ∼ 1011-1013 pb for mDM ∼ 1 GeV
If σvannihilation ∼ 1 pb : ΩDMh2 ∼ 0.1 (WIMP miracle)If σvannihilation ∼ σSI : ΩDMh2 1
One option
Keep pb cross sections in the Early Universe but enhance theinteractions in DM halos today
Invoke a light mediator and consider non-perturbative effects
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
How to produce self-interacting DM
Solution to small-scale problems: σSImDM∼ 0.1− 10 cm2/g
σSI ∼ 1011-1013 pb for mDM ∼ 1 GeV
If σvannihilation is of the same order of magnitude: ΩDM 1
Another option: Suppress the interactions in the Early Universe.
Consider annihilations of three DM particles into two of them.
SIMPs (Strongly Interacting Massive Particles)
Hochberg, Kuflik, Volansky, Wacker (PRL 2014)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Similar processes occur in the Sun
Bahcall et al. , ( ApJ, 2005)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Concrete Implementations
Basic requirements
An underlying principle for having 3-to-2 processes
Dark Matter Stability
Examples:
Z3 dark matter Bernal et al. (2015), Soo-Min Choi (2015)
QCD-like theories of dynamicalchiral symmetry breaking Hochberg et al, 2014
Dark Matter in a hidden gauge theory Yamanaka et al (2015)
...
This talk
Warm-up: spin-1 case (vector SIMPs) Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
Spin-2 case Preliminary
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Concrete Implementations
Basic requirements
An underlying principle for having 3-to-2 processes
Dark Matter Stability
Examples:
Z3 dark matter Bernal et al. (2015), Soo-Min Choi (2015)
QCD-like theories of dynamicalchiral symmetry breaking Hochberg et al, 2014
Dark Matter in a hidden gauge theory Yamanaka et al (2015)
...
This talk
Warm-up: spin-1 case (vector SIMPs) Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
Spin-2 case Preliminary
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Concrete Implementations
Basic requirements
An underlying principle for having 3-to-2 processes
Dark Matter Stability
Examples:
Z3 dark matter Bernal et al. (2015), Soo-Min Choi (2015)
QCD-like theories of dynamicalchiral symmetry breaking Hochberg et al, 2014
Dark Matter in a hidden gauge theory Yamanaka et al (2015)
...
This talk
Warm-up: spin-1 case (vector SIMPs) Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
Spin-2 case Preliminary
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Spin-1 case: Hidden Vector DM model
Field SU(3) SU(2) U(1)Y SU(2)XH 1 2 1
2 0φ 1 1 0 2A′µ 1 1 0 3
Local SU(2)X → Global SO(3)Gauge Fields A′µ → Massive Fields Aµ Stable (DM Candidate)Doublet φ → Higgs-like η It mixes with the Higgs
Hambye (JHEP 2009)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Vector SIMPs
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
Dark Matter
Self-Interactions
3-to-2 process
Annihilationsinto SM particlesare naturally
suppressed
A
A
A
AA
AA
A A
A
A
A A
A
A
A
η, hA
A
Aη, h
A
A A
A
A
A
AA
A
AA
A
A
A A
A
A
A
A AA
A
AA
A
AA
A A
A
A
AA
A A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
η, h
A
A AA
A
AA
A
η, hA
A A
A
A
η, hA
A A
A
A
A
AA
η, h A
A
A
A
A
Aη, h
A
A
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Vector SIMPs
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
Dark Matter
Self-Interactions
3-to-2 process
Annihilationsinto SM particlesare naturally
suppressed
A
A
A
AA
AA
A A
A
A
A A
A
A
A
η, hA
A
Aη, h
A
A A
A
A
A
AA
A
AA
A
A
A A
A
A
A
A AA
A
AA
A
AA
A A
A
A
AA
A A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
η, h
A
A AA
A
AA
A
η, hA
A A
A
A
η, hA
A A
A
A
A
AA
η, h A
A
A
A
A
Aη, h
A
A
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Production Regimes
For fixed mη and mA
10-12 10-10 10-8 10-6 10-4 10-2 10010-10
10-8
10-6
10-4
10-2
100
λm
αX
Phase diagram (mA=10 GeV, mη≪mA)
Regime4
Regime3BRegime2&3A
Regime1
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
etaetaetaetaeta
Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
Freeze-in regime
SIMPs in kinetic equilibriumSIMPs not in kinetic equilibrium
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Production Regimes
For fixed mη and mA
10-12 10-10 10-8 10-6 10-4 10-2 10010-10
10-8
10-6
10-4
10-2
100
λm
αX
Phase diagram (mA=10 GeV, mη≪mA)
Regime4
Regime3BRegime2&3A
Regime1
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
etaetaetaetaeta
Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
Freeze-in regime
SIMPs in kinetic equilibriumSIMPs not in kinetic equilibrium
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Production Regimes
For fixed mη and mA
10-12 10-10 10-8 10-6 10-4 10-2 10010-10
10-8
10-6
10-4
10-2
100
λm
αX
Phase diagram (mA=10 GeV, mη≪mA)
Regime4
Regime3BRegime2&3A
Regime1
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
etaetaetaetaeta
Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
Freeze-in regime
SIMPs in kinetic equilibrium
SIMPs not in kinetic equilibrium
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Production Regimes
For fixed mη and mA
10-12 10-10 10-8 10-6 10-4 10-2 10010-10
10-8
10-6
10-4
10-2
100
λm
αX
Phase diagram (mA=10 GeV, mη≪mA)
Regime4
Regime3BRegime2&3A
Regime1
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
etaetaetaetaeta
Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
Freeze-in regime
SIMPs in kinetic equilibriumSIMPs not in kinetic equilibrium
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Regime 3A for 3-to-2 processes
mA = 100 MeV, mη = 300 MeV, αX = 0.08 and λm = 4.3 × 10−12
0.001 0.010 0.100 1 10 100
2.× 10-9
5.× 10-9
1.× 10-8
2.× 10-8
x = mA / T
YA
a b c d
actualthermal
ΩAh2=0.12
0.001 0.010 0.100 1 10 100
1
10
100
1000
104
105
x = mA / T
Temperature
[MeV
]
a b c d
mA
T'
T
In (c), T ′/T ∼ a/log(a)
Carlson, Machacek, Hall (Astrophysics J 1992)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Regime 3A for 3-to-2 processes
mA = 100 MeV, mη = 300 MeV, αX = 0.08 and λm = 4.3 × 10−12
0.001 0.010 0.100 1 10 100
2.× 10-9
5.× 10-9
1.× 10-8
2.× 10-8
x = mA / T
YA
a b c d
actualthermal
ΩAh2=0.12
0.001 0.010 0.100 1 10 100
1
10
100
1000
104
105
x = mA / T
Temperature
[MeV
]
a b c d
mA
T'
T
In (c), T ′/T ∼ a/log(a)
Carlson, Machacek, Hall (Astrophysics J 1992)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Regime 3A
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103
10-7
10-5
10-3
10-1
101
mA [MeV]
αX
Lyman-α
Dark freeze-out
Freeze-in
Reanni.
Log10[T'/T]
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
Figure: Parameter space for self-Interactions
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Bernal, Chu, GGC, Hambye, Zaldivar (JCAP 2016)
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
How about spin-2 dark matter?
Classical theory of free massive spin-2 fields. Fierz and Pauli (1939)
Interactions → Very hard!.Until very recently, it seemed that any interacting theory had ghosts.
Boulware, Deser (PRD 1972)
Ghosts are absent for very restrictive interaction terms inbimetric theories. Hassan, Rosen (PRL 2012), Hassan, Rosen, Schmidt-May (JHEP 2012)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
How about spin-2 dark matter?
Classical theory of free massive spin-2 fields. Fierz and Pauli (1939)
Interactions → Very hard!.Until very recently, it seemed that any interacting theory had ghosts.
Boulware, Deser (PRD 1972)
Ghosts are absent for very restrictive interaction terms inbimetric theories. Hassan, Rosen (PRL 2012), Hassan, Rosen, Schmidt-May (JHEP 2012)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
How about spin-2 dark matter?
Classical theory of free massive spin-2 fields. Fierz and Pauli (1939)
Interactions → Very hard!.Until very recently, it seemed that any interacting theory had ghosts.
Boulware, Deser (PRD 1972)
Ghosts are absent for very restrictive interaction terms inbimetric theories. Hassan, Rosen (PRL 2012), Hassan, Rosen, Schmidt-May (JHEP 2012)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
What is a bimetric theory?
A massive spin-2 particle will generally mix with the gravitron.
Gravitron: fluctuation of the metric→ Write down a theory with 2 metrics and have them interact.
S = m2g
∫d4x
(√−gR(g) + α2
√−f R(f )
)+ Sint + Smatter .
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
What is a bimetric theory?
A massive spin-2 particle will generally mix with the gravitron.
Gravitron: fluctuation of the metric→ Write down a theory with 2 metrics and have them interact.
S = m2g
∫d4x
(√−gR(g) + α2
√−f R(f )
)+ Sint + Smatter .
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
No ghosts are present if
Sint = −2α2m4g
∫d4x√−g V (
√g−1f )
V (S) = β0 + β1 Sµ1
µ1 + β2 Sµ1
[µ1Sµ2
µ2] + β3 Sµ1
[µ1Sµ2
µ2Sµ3
µ3] + β4 detS
Consistent theory with few parameters
√−gV (g−1f )
∣∣∣βn
=√−f V (f −1g)
∣∣∣β4−n
The metrics are treated symmetrically in Sint.
Smatter =
∫d4x√−gLmatter(g ,Φmatter)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
No ghosts are present if
Sint = −2α2m4g
∫d4x√−g V (
√g−1f )
V (S) = β0 + β1 Sµ1
µ1 + β2 Sµ1
[µ1Sµ2
µ2] + β3 Sµ1
[µ1Sµ2
µ2Sµ3
µ3] + β4 detS
Consistent theory with few parameters
√−gV (g−1f )
∣∣∣βn
=√−f V (f −1g)
∣∣∣β4−n
The metrics are treated symmetrically in Sint.
Smatter =
∫d4x√−gLmatter(g ,Φmatter)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
No ghosts are present if
Sint = −2α2m4g
∫d4x√−g V (
√g−1f )
V (S) = β0 + β1 Sµ1
µ1 + β2 Sµ1
[µ1Sµ2
µ2] + β3 Sµ1
[µ1Sµ2
µ2Sµ3
µ3] + β4 detS
Consistent theory with few parameters
√−gV (g−1f )
∣∣∣βn
=√−f V (f −1g)
∣∣∣β4−n
The metrics are treated symmetrically in Sint.
Smatter =
∫d4x√−gLmatter(g ,Φmatter)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Quadratic Lagrangian:
Spin-2 particles are fluctuations of the metrics around the same background
gµν = gµν +1
mPl(δGµν − αδMµν) , fµν = gµν +
1
mPl
(δGµν + α−1δMµν
)
S ⊃∫
d4x√−g(Lkin
2 (δG ) + Lkin2 (δM)− m2
FP
4
(tr(δM2)− tr(δM)2
)− 1
mPl(δGµν − αδMµν)Tµν + LΛ
)
Fierz-Pauli mass: mFP = mPl√β1 + 2β2 + β3
Reduced Planck mass: mPl = mg
√1 + α2
Λ = α2m2g (β0 + 3β1 + 3β2 + β3) = m2
g (β4 + 3β3 + 3β2 + β1)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Babichev, Marzola, Raidal, Schmidt-MayUrban, Veermae, Von Strauss (PRD 2016, JCAP 2016)
Two spin-2 particles:
one massless, one massive.
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Quadratic Lagrangian:
Spin-2 particles are fluctuations of the metrics around the same background
gµν = gµν +1
mPl(δGµν − αδMµν) , fµν = gµν +
1
mPl
(δGµν + α−1δMµν
)S ⊃
∫d4x
√−g(Lkin
2 (δG ) + Lkin2 (δM)− m2
FP
4
(tr(δM2)− tr(δM)2
)− 1
mPl(δGµν − αδMµν)Tµν + LΛ
)
Fierz-Pauli mass: mFP = mPl√β1 + 2β2 + β3
Reduced Planck mass: mPl = mg
√1 + α2
Λ = α2m2g (β0 + 3β1 + 3β2 + β3) = m2
g (β4 + 3β3 + 3β2 + β1)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Babichev, Marzola, Raidal, Schmidt-MayUrban, Veermae, Von Strauss (PRD 2016, JCAP 2016)
Two spin-2 particles:
one massless, one massive.
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Quadratic Lagrangian:
Spin-2 particles are fluctuations of the metrics around the same background
gµν = gµν +1
mPl(δGµν − αδMµν) , fµν = gµν +
1
mPl
(δGµν + α−1δMµν
)S ⊃
∫d4x
√−g(Lkin
2 (δG ) + Lkin2 (δM)− m2
FP
4
(tr(δM2)− tr(δM)2
)− 1
mPl(δGµν − αδMµν)Tµν + LΛ
)Fierz-Pauli mass: mFP = mPl
√β1 + 2β2 + β3
Reduced Planck mass: mPl = mg
√1 + α2
Λ = α2m2g (β0 + 3β1 + 3β2 + β3) = m2
g (β4 + 3β3 + 3β2 + β1)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Babichev, Marzola, Raidal, Schmidt-MayUrban, Veermae, Von Strauss (PRD 2016, JCAP 2016)
Two spin-2 particles:
one massless, one massive.
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Dark Matter
This theory modifies GR → The laws of gravity change
Make sure that the predictions are in agreement with those ofGR where this has been tested.
Simplest possibility : take α 1
In this limit, δM is a dark matter candidate
Vertex δMδGδG = 0 → Γ (δM → δGδG ) = 0
δM responds to δG (gravity) in the same way as the SMfields.
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Babichev, Marzola, Raidal, Schmidt-MayUrban, Veermae, Von Strauss (PRD 2016, JCAP 2016)
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Dark Matter
This theory modifies GR → The laws of gravity change
Make sure that the predictions are in agreement with those ofGR where this has been tested.
Simplest possibility : take α 1
In this limit, δM is a dark matter candidate
Vertex δMδGδG = 0 → Γ (δM → δGδG ) = 0
δM responds to δG (gravity) in the same way as the SMfields.
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Babichev, Marzola, Raidal, Schmidt-MayUrban, Veermae, Von Strauss (PRD 2016, JCAP 2016)
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Dark Matter
This theory modifies GR → The laws of gravity change
Make sure that the predictions are in agreement with those ofGR where this has been tested.
Simplest possibility : take α 1
In this limit, δM is a dark matter candidate
Vertex δMδGδG = 0 → Γ (δM → δGδG ) = 0
δM responds to δG (gravity) in the same way as the SMfields.
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Babichev, Marzola, Raidal, Schmidt-MayUrban, Veermae, Von Strauss (PRD 2016, JCAP 2016)
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Heavy spin-2 DM
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Babichev, Marzola, Raidal, Schmidt-MayUrban, Veermae, Von Strauss (PRD 2016, JCAP 2016)
Γ (δM → SMSM) ∼ α2m3FP
m2Pl
Perturbativity condition:typical energy < αmPl
Production via Freeze-in
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Heavy spin-2 DM
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Babichev, Marzola, Raidal, Schmidt-MayUrban, Veermae, Von Strauss (PRD 2016, JCAP 2016)
Γ (δM → SMSM) ∼ α2m3FP
m2Pl
Perturbativity condition:typical energy < αmPl
Production via Freeze-in
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Heavy spin-2 DM
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
Babichev, Marzola, Raidal, Schmidt-MayUrban, Veermae, Von Strauss (PRD 2016, JCAP 2016)
Γ (δM → SMSM) ∼ α2m3FP
m2Pl
Perturbativity condition:typical energy < αmPl
Production via Freeze-in
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Second surprise
gµν = gµν +δGµν
mPl+O(α1) , fµν = gµν +
1
α
δMµν
mPl+O(α1)
Loosely speaking, the self-interactions of δM are the same as thoseof δG but enhanced by powers of 1/α.
Figure: Bimetric theories naturally give rise to self-interacting spin-2 DM
Very predictive! Lengthy calculations
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
PRELIMINARY
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
Self-interaction cross section
gµν = gµν +δGµν
mPl+O(α1) , fµν = gµν +
1
α
δMµν
mPl+O(α0)
Loosely speaking, the self-interactions of δM are the same as thoseof δG but enhanced by powers of 1/α.
Figure: Bimetric theories naturally give rise to self-interacting spin-2 DM
Very predictive! But calculations are very lengthy
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
PRELIMINARY
σSI =(β1 + 2β2 + β3)2
m2FPα
4F (r) , with r =
β1 − β3
β1 + 2β2 + β3
Perturbativity condition: typical energy < αmPl
β1 + 2β2 + β3 < α2
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
How can we produced them? + no thermal equilibrium
(Regime 3A)
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
PRELIMINARY
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
How can we produced them? + no thermal equilibrium
(Regime 3A)Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
PRELIMINARY
MotivationSpin-1 caseSpin-2 case
- -
≡ (β-β)/(β+β+β)
[
]-
Camilo Garcia Cely, ULB From spin-1 to spin-2 SIMPs
PRELIMINARY
Conclusions
In bimetric theories, requiring negligible interactions betweenthe second metric and ordinary particles naturally leads tospin-2 SIDM capable of addressing the small-scale problems.
SIDM without light mediators can be produced via 3-to-2annihilations. The corresponding increase of temperature isnot problematic if the two sectors have a large temperatureratio before freeze-out.
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103
10-7
10-5
10-3
10-1
101
mA [MeV]
αX
Lyman-α
Dark freeze-out
Freeze-in
Reanni.
Log10[T'/T]
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5