cancer chemical drinkwater ca

8/19/2019 Cancer Chemical DrinkWater CA

1/8

There’s a Cancer-Causing Chemical in My Drinking Water, But California Isn’t Regulating It

Sasha Khokha prepares to test the water in her Fresno home for the presence of 1,2,3-TCP. (Lisa Morehouse)

LISTEN:

I have to admit, after the water crisis in Flint, Michigan, I’m a little freaked out about what’s in my tap water. So when I opened my

water bill from the city of Fresno recently, I decided to actually read the “consumer confidence report” for drinking water. And I fou

this footnote in tiny print:

Consumer Confidence Report Footnote

123 Trichloropropane has been detected in 29 wells in Fresno…. Some people who use water containing it over many years may have an increased risk of getting cancer,

based on studies in laboratory animals.

WATER (HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/SCIENCE/CATEGORY/WATER/)

By Sasha Khokha (http://ww2.kqed.org/science/author/sasha-khokha/)

MARCH 7, 2016

00:00

SHA

http://ww2.kqed.org/science/author/sasha-khokha/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/category/water/


2/8

Wait…what? I have two little kids, and my family drinks the tap water. And it might cause cancer? I decided to fork out $200 to get m

tested. And to start digging into how 1,2,3-TCP got into the water.

Turns out, it’s not just Fresno. According to the State Water Resources Control Board

(http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/123TCP.shtml), 1,2,3-TCP has been found in about a hundred

public water systems across California, mostly in the Central Valley but also in counties like Santa Cruz, Monterey, Sacramento, and

Los Angeles.

But many Californians don’t know whether this stuff is in their water, because neither the state nor the federal EPA regulates 1,2,3-TC

in drinking water. So that means public utilities don’t have to test for it, filter it out, or advise their customers if it’s in the water.

123-TCP IN ACTIVE COMMUNITY WELLS

Water systems where significant levels of contaminant 123-TCP have been detected.

SOURCE: CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, MAP: Teodros Hailye, KQED Science

That’s even though the state determined it was a carcinogen back in 1992. And the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard

Assessment (OEHHA) set a very low public health goal (http://oehha.ca.gov/water/phg/pdf/082009TCP_phg.pdf )for 1,2,3-TCP in 200

“There is no absolutely no question that is a genotoxic carcinogen,” says Robert Howd, a toxicologist who led the scientific review fo

OEHHA.

There have been no studies of 1,2,3-TCP’s effect on humans, but animal studies showed multiple tumors at multiple sites in both rats

and mice.

http://oehha.ca.gov/water/phg/pdf/082009TCP_phg.pdfhttp://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/123TCP.shtml


3/8

“The data are very clear,” Howd says. “Virtually nobody is disputing that. There’s just no controversy about this being a DNA reactiv

carcinogen.”

Howd’s team set the public health goal at .7 parts per trillion (.0007 parts per billion) The only carcinogen with a lower state public

health goal for drinking water is dioxin.

How Did It Get Into the Water?

“This whole story begins in the 1930s, the dawn of the age of chemical agriculture” says San Francisco attorney Todd Robins

(http://rbwaterlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Daily-Journal-Article_8.20.12.pdf) . He represents about 30 communities aroundthe state who are suing over 1,2,3-TCP contamination, and he’s spent the last decade trying to track how it leached into groundwater

“Shell saw a huge opportunity to take a hazardous waste stream from their chemical plants…and start

putting it in barrels, and selling it to farmers.”

— San Francisco attorney Todd Rob

“Somebody at the Pineapple Research Institute in Honolulu got ahold of this sample of what was essentially hazardous waste from a

chemical production process at Shell,” he says, “and he used it in some experiments.”

The experiments, Robins says, were to figure out how to control nematodes, tiny microscopic worms in the soil that attack a plant’sroots.

“Shell saw a huge opportunity to take a hazardous waste stream from their chemical plants … and start putting it in barrels, and selli

it to farmers,” says Robins. “Then Dow soon followed suit.”

The companies sold the product to farmers as a fumigant, which is injected into the soil.

Robins has compiled a huge stack of documents that show neither Dow Chemical nor Shell listed 1,2,3-TCP

(https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/000464-00240-19741121.pdf) on their product labels

(http://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/000201-00253-19690414.pdf), even though it was one of several ingredients. One

Dow’s own scientists admitted (http://ww2.kqed.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/35/2016/03/TCP_memo.pdf) that the compouhad served no function killing nematodes.

Robins shows me a 1974 memo where Dow describes some of the fumigant components as “garbage.”

http://ww2.kqed.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/35/2016/03/TCP_memo.pdfhttp://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/000201-00253-19690414.pdfhttps://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/000464-00240-19741121.pdfhttp://rbwaterlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Daily-Journal-Article_8.20.12.pdf


4/8

Ralph Gutierrez says Shell and Dow should pay to clean 1,2,3-TCP out of Woodville’s water. (Sasha Khokha)

“Some of the most startling information is how clearly the companies understood from a scientific perspective the amount of garbag

they were putting into these products,” says Robins, “and knowingly having farmers essentially dispose of their hazardous waste for

them on farm fields throughout our state.”

In a few cases, Dow and Shell have paid to clean up groundwater with 1,2,3-TCP. But in the more than 3 dozen cases filed against the

companies over the contamination, they’ve never admitted any wrongdoing.

Both Dow and Shell declined my request for a taped interview. They sent me emails saying they couldn’t comment on active litigatio

Dow spokesman Randy Fishback wrote that fumigants with 1,2,3-TCP were part of what he called “historical, highly beneficial

agricultural products” that “controlled agricultural pests that otherwise would have caused millions of dollars in annual crop losses.

He added those products have been off the market for several decades, and that “TCP is also associated with certain industrial

processes in which Dow had no involvement.”

Tiny Communities Can’t Afford Cleanup


5/8

Woodville is a small farming community in Tulare County, where the 1,2,3-TCP in the drinking water is ten

times the state’s public health goal. (Sasha Khokha/KQED)

Some of the communities suing Dow and Shell have only a few hundred households, like Woodville in rural Tulare County. Ralph

Gutierrez runs the water system here.

“I’m the meter reader, I’m the sewer line cleaner, I do the budget,” says Gutierrez, grinning in his cowboy boots and Dodger hat.

He unlocks the gate to show me one of the town’s two drinking water wells, surrounded by orchards and cow pastures. These wells

serve a total of 467 households, and 1,2,3-TCP has been detected in the water at 7 parts per trillion, ten times the public health goal.

“Dow and Shell are the ones that put this into the system,” Gutierrez says. “Obviously, they have money to attack their problems, bu

when you come to communities like this, they’re all farmworkers.”

Gutierrez says there’s no way he can raise water rates high enough to pay for expensive carbon filtration to keep the carcinogen from

reaching people’s taps.

“I wouldn’t want my kids drinking it,” he says. “Would Dow Chemical or Shell like their people to be drinking this water? I don’t thin

so.”

Results From My Tap

Turns out the sample from my kitchen tap comes in at 2.2 parts per trillion. That’s three times the state public health goal for 1,2,3-

TCP.

“It’s been a high priority for us to develop regulations.”

— Cindy Forbes, State Water Resources Control Boa

OEHHA sets its goal to try to reduce the lifetime cancer risk to less than one in 1 million. So my risk is three in 1 million, over a lifeti

drinking my tap water.

Of course, my overall risk of getting cancer from any source is much higher; it’s more like one in three. Truth is, I should probably be

more worried about secondhand smoke, or Fresno’s notoriously dirty air.

But I’m not taking any chances with my kids. I’ve installed an undersink filter that says it takes out Volatile Organic Compounds

(VOCs). But there’s no guarantee it takes out 1,2,3-TCP, because without a government standard, it’s not rated for that.


6/8

EXPLORE: ENVIRONMENT (HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/SCIENCE/CATEGORY/ENVIRONMENT/), HEALTH (HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/SCIENCE/CATEGORY/HEALTH/), NEW

(HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/SCIENCE/CATEGORY/NEWS/), WATER (HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/SCIENCE/CATEGORY/WATER/), 1

(HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/SCIENCE/TAG/1/), 2 (HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/SCIENCE/TAG/2/), 3 TCP (HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/SCIENCE/TAG/3-TCP/), USEPA(HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/SCIENCE/TAG/USEPA/)

State Regulation On Its Way

Some water systems in the Central Valley have levels of 1,2,3-TCP that push the potential cancer risk to roughly one in 6,000. And a

grassroots group called Community Water Center (http://www.communitywatercenter.org/cwc_kicks_off_2016_123tcp_campaign) is

pressuring the state to set a maximum contaminant level for the compound. That’s an enforceable standard, unlike the public health

goal.

Nearly 25 years after California declared 1,2,3-TCP to be a carcinogen, drinking water regulators are planning to set that level by next

spring.

“It’s been a high priority for us to develop regulations, but we have had so many other regulations with limited resources to work on

that we haven’t been able to get it over the finish line,” says Cindy Forbes, deputy director for the water board’s drinking water

program. “There are a lot of pieces to setting a new maximum contaminant level.”

Like conducting their own peer-reviewed science, taking public comment, and evaluating the cost of detection and cleanup — not ju

the health risks.

“It’s our number one priority,” says Forbes. “It’s my priority, it’s the board’s priority.”

(http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-california-isnt-regulating-it/?share=facebook&nb=1)

(http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-california-isnt-regulating-it/?share=twitter&nb=1)

(http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-california-isnt-

regulating-it/?share=pinterest&nb=1)

(http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-california-isnt-regulating-it/?share=google-plus-1&nb=1)

http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-california-isnt-regulating-it/?share=google-plus-1&nb=1http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-california-isnt-regulating-it/?share=pinterest&nb=1http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-california-isnt-regulating-it/?share=twitter&nb=1http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-california-isnt-regulating-it/?share=facebook&nb=1http://www.communitywatercenter.org/cwc_kicks_off_2016_123tcp_campaignhttp://ww2.kqed.org/science/tag/usepa/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/tag/3-tcp/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/tag/2/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/tag/1/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/category/water/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/category/news/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/category/health/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/category/environment/


7/8

PONSORED BY

Become a KQED sponsor »

(http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-california-isnt-regulating-it/?share=email&nb=1)

8 Comments (http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-

california-isnt-regulating-it/#disqus_thread)

Cold, Then Dry: Dealing

California Citrus Farmersa Double Punch

(http://blogs.kqed.org/science/2014/04/08/cold-then-dry-dealing-california-citrus-farmers-a-double-punch/)

Save the Bay Co-Founder

Sylvia McLaughlin Dies(http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/01/20/save-the-bay-founder-sylvia-mclaughlin-dies/)

Drought-Stricken

California TownStruggles to Keep the

Water Flowing

(http://blogs.kqed.org/science/2014/08/20/drought-stricken-california-town-struggles-to-keep-the-

water-flowing/)

California's Drought is

Hurting Farmers MoreThan Food Consumers

(http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2014/07/15/californias-drought-is-hurting-farmers-more-than-food-consumers/)

Silicon Valley Billionaire

Battles Surfers OverBeach Access

(http://blogs.kqed.org/science/audio/silicon- valley-billionaire-battles-surfers-overbeach-access/)

State Puts $25 Billion

Price Tag on WaterTunnel Plan

(http://blogs.kqed.org/puts-25-billion-price-tplan/)

Powered by

(https://contextly.com

RELATED

ABOUT KQED SCIENCE

KQED Science (https://ww2.kqed.org/science/about) brings you award-winning science and environment coverage from the Bay Area and beyond, b

the flagship Northern California PBS and NPR affiliate. Meet the KQED Science Staff (/science/about/#staff) and learn more about our 19 Communit

Partners. (/science/about/#partners)

Support of KQED Science is provided by HopeLab, The David B. Gold Foundation, S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation, Th

The Vadasz Family Foundation, John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Sm

KQED. FOLLOW KQED SCIENCE

http://-/?-http://ww2.kqed.org/science/feed/https://instagram.com/kqedsciencehttp://www.pinterest.com/kqedsciencehttp://kqedscience.tumblr.com/https://plus.google.com/+KQEDSCIENCEhttp://www.youtube.com/user/kqedsciencehttp://www.facebook.com/kqedsciencehttp://www.twitter.com/kqedsciencehttp://ww2.kqed.org/science/about/#partnershttp://ww2.kqed.org/science/about/#staffhttps://ww2.kqed.org/science/abouthttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=L&ai=BMWQnH2PoVtmKHpCK3AHbkZaACf3jqL8HAAAAEAEg8-u1BjgAWM23kYfVAmDJnrWM0KTcEbIBDHd3Mi5rcWVkLm9yZ7oBCzAwZ2ZwX2ltYWdlyAEC2gF_aHR0cDovL3d3Mi5rcWVkLm9yZy9zY2llbmNlLzIwMTYvMDMvMDcvdGhlcmVzLWEtY2FuY2VyLWNhdXNpbmctY2hlbWljYWwtaW4tbXktZHJpbmtpbmctd2F0ZXItYnV0LWNhbGlmb3JuaWEtaXNudC1yZWd1bGF0aW5nLWl0L8ACAuACAOoCFS8xMDAxNzA1LzMwMHgxMDBfYXJ0c_gC99EegAMBkAPgA5gDrAKoAwHIA5kE4AQB0gUFENXWnh-QBgGgBhTYBwHgBws&num=0&cid=5Gh5-Bgxo7CIgyQNsZK1H8Sp&sig=AOD64_3ZJKan59uaCWLgKRCpV6_A2Z1A8Q&client=ca-pub-6598824972137703&adurl=http://www.thecjm.org/on-view/upcoming/bill-graham-and-the-rock-and-roll-revolution/abouthttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=L&ai=Bqy_AH2PoVtqKHpCK3AHbkZaACYX3ppEHAAAAEAEg8-u1BjgAWNWKpP-9AmDJnrWM0KTcEbIBDHd3Mi5rcWVkLm9yZ7oBCzAwZ2ZwX2ltYWdlyAEC2gF_aHR0cDovL3d3Mi5rcWVkLm9yZy9zY2llbmNlLzIwMTYvMDMvMDcvdGhlcmVzLWEtY2FuY2VyLWNhdXNpbmctY2hlbWljYWwtaW4tbXktZHJpbmtpbmctd2F0ZXItYnV0LWNhbGlmb3JuaWEtaXNudC1yZWd1bGF0aW5nLWl0L8ACAuACAOoCFS8xMDAxNzA1LzMwMHgyNTBfYXJ0c_gC99EekAPgA5gDrAKoAwHIA5kE0ASQTuAEAdIFBRCVxNQbkAYBoAYU2AcB4AcL&num=0&cid=5GjFL6v8fXTy3Ih2jjwf1eex&sig=AOD64_0B6Xqnk1YIiKii2nL0sKnc3awrdg&client=ca-pub-6598824972137703&adurl=http://www.rowbotham.com/https://contextly.com/http://blogs.kqed.org/science/2013/05/30/state-puts-25-billion-price-tag-on-water-tunnel-plan/http://blogs.kqed.org/science/audio/silicon-valley-billionaire-battles-surfers-over-beach-access/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2014/07/15/californias-drought-is-hurting-farmers-more-than-food-consumers/http://blogs.kqed.org/science/2014/08/20/drought-stricken-california-town-struggles-to-keep-the-water-flowing/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/01/20/save-the-bay-founder-sylvia-mclaughlin-dies/http://blogs.kqed.org/science/2014/04/08/cold-then-dry-dealing-california-citrus-farmers-a-double-punch/http://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/03/07/theres-a-cancer-causing-chemical-in-my-drinking-water-but-california-isnt-regulating-it/?share=email&nb=1http://www.kqed.org/support/sponsorship/


8/8

COPYRIGHT © 2016 KQED INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | TERMS OF SERVICE (HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/ABOUT/HELP/TERMS-SERVICE/) | PRIVACY POLICY (HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/ABOUT/HELP/PRIVA

| CONTACT US (HTTP://WW2.KQED.ORG/ABOUT/CONTACT/)
http://ww2.kqed.org/about/contact/http://ww2.kqed.org/about/help/privacy/http://ww2.kqed.org/about/help/terms-service/

cancer chemical drinkwater ca

Documents