cap.org v. fnl fda: challenges to protecting public health – pathology’s perspective roger d....

14
cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

Upload: avis-powers

Post on 11-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

cap.org v. FNL

FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective

Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P.

March 7, 2013

Advocacy

Page 2: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

Shared Goals

• Ensure patient access to high quality testing

• Assure that tests being offered are analytically and clinically valid

• Leverage resources to maximize patient safety and enhance public health

• Encourage innovation and continued improvement of Laboratory-Developed Tests

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 2

Page 3: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

Evolution of Pathology

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 3

Page 4: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

Personalized Medicine

• Linking Tests to Action and Therapy

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 4

Assessment Test Action Therapy

“The Right Drug for the Right Patient at the Right Dose”

Page 5: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

Companion Diagnostics Model

• Today’s Paradigmo One test, one drug

• Emerging Reality o Tumor marker profiles guiding rational

targeted therapy combinations

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 5

Page 6: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

Current Situation

Regulation of Test Manufacturers

FDA

CMSRegulation of Clinical Testing Laboratories

??? LDT ???

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 6

Page 7: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

Laboratory Developed Test

• A test developed within a CLIA-certified laboratory that is used in patient management and has both of the following characteristics:o The test is performed by the clinical

laboratory in which the test was developed; and

o The test is neither FDA-cleared nor FDA-approved

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 7

Page 8: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

CAP Approach

• Oversight of LDTs should be strengthened through a partnership between CMS, FDA and 3rd Party Accreditors

• Analytic and clinical validation of these tests require oversight and continued monitoring

• Oversight should be stratified based on risk

• Our approach recommends targeted FDA review of only high-risk LDTs

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 8

Page 9: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

The CAP Paradigm for LDTs…

LDT #1

Low Risk

Laboratory

Validates & Places

in Service.

Accreditor Inspects.

LDT #2

Mod Risk

Laboratory

Validates. Accreditor Reviews Before

Test Placed in Service.

LDT #3

High Risk

Laboratory

Validates. FDA

Reviews Before

Test Placed in Service.

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 9

Page 10: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

Risk Classification Principles

Classification Principles

Low •Test result is typically used in conjunction with other clinical findings to establish or confirm diagnosis. •No claim about test result alone determines prognosis or direction of therapy.

Moderate •Test result is typically used for diagnosis, predicting disease progression or identifying whether a patient is eligible for a specific therapy.•Laboratory may make claims which determine prognosis or direction of therapy.

High •Test result predicts risk, progression of, or patient eligibility for a specific therapy; AND•Test uses proprietary algorithms or computations such that the test result cannot be tied to the methods used, or inter-laboratory comparisons can not be performed.

10© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.

Page 11: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

CAP LDT Validation Principles

• The Proposal informed by evidence-based review and incorporates FDA and CLIA principles.

o Ensures analytical and clinical validity and consistency of claims with intended use;

o Least burdensome and achievable for laboratories

−Field tested to validate principles

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 11

Page 12: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

Elements of CAP LDT Validation

• Encompasses the development stage of an LDT and serves to establish a testing procedure and identify the intended use of the test.

Defining the Disorder/Test/Clinic

al Scenario

• The test’s ability to accurately and reliably measure the analyte of interest in the clinical laboratory, and in specimens representative of the population of interest.

Analytical Validity

• The ability of a test to diagnose or predict risk for a particular health condition, measured by clinical (or diagnostic) sensitivity, clinical (or diagnostic) specificity, and predictive values.

Clinical Validity

12© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.

Page 13: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

Conclusion

The CAP approach to oversight of LDTs will ensure patient access to high quality testing, preserving innovation while maximizing patient safety and enhancing public health.

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 13

Page 14: Cap.org v. FNL FDA: Challenges to Protecting Public Health – Pathology’s Perspective Roger D. Klein, M.D., JD, F.C.A.P. March 7, 2013 Advocacy

© 2012 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. 14