case3:05-cv-00077 document272 filed 04/02/2007 page 1...

88
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION In re DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Civil Action No. 3:05-0077 Judge Todd J. Campbell Magistrate Judge Juliet E . Griffin CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS. STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 of

Upload: others

Post on 09-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION

In re DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATIONSECURITIES LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Civil Action No. 3:05-0077

Judge Todd J. CampbellMagistrate Judge Juliet E . Griffin

CLASS ACTION

ALL ACTIONS.

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 of

Page 2: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

This Stipulation of Settlement dated as of March 30, 2007 (the "Stipulation ), is made and

entered into by and among the following Settling Parties (as defined further in Section IV hereof): (i)

the Lead Plaintiffs (on behalf of themselves and each of the Class Members), by and through their

counsel ofrecord, and (ii) the Defendants identified below, by and through their counsel ofrecord in

the Litigation . The Stipulation is intended by the Settling Parties to fully, finally and forever resolve,

discharge and settle the Released Claims upon and subject to the terms and conditions hereof.

I. THE LITIGATION

Shortly after January 26, 2005, several securities class action lawsuits were filed in the

United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division (the "Court )

on behalf ofpersons who purchased securities of Direct General Corporation ("Direct General or

the "Company ).

In March 2005, the Court consolidated the actions for all purposes under the caption In re

Direct General Corporation Securities Litigation , Civil Action No. 3:05 -0077 (the "Litigation ).

Thereafter, in April 2005, the Court appointed the Structural Ironworkers Local Union #1 Annuity,

Pension and Welfare Funds and John Dzaugis as Lead Plaintiffs under §21D(a)(3)(B) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act ) and approved Lead Plaintiffs ' selection of

Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP as Lead Counsel and Barrett, Johnston &

Parsley as liaison counsel.

On June 17, 2005, Lead Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of

the Federal Securities Laws (the "Complaint ), asserting claims under the Securities Act of 1933

("Securities Act ) and the Exchange Act on behalf of all persons who purchased Direct General

securities between August 11, 2003 and January 26, 2005. The Complaint names Direct General,

William C. Adair, Jr., Tammy R. Adair, Jacqueline C. Adair, Barry D. Elkins, Brian G. Moore, Fred

H. Medling, Raymond L. Osterhout, Stephen Rohde, certain investment banking firms that

-1-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 2 of

Page 3: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

underwrote Direct General's stock offerings and the Company 's auditor Ernst & Young LLP

("E&Y ) as defendants. The Complaint alleges that Defendants made materially false and

misleading statements and omissions regarding the impact on the Company 's claims exposure and

the level of the Company 's related loss reserves as a result of recent Florida legislation , the Florida

Motor Vehicle Insurance Affordability Reform Act of 2003.

Following the filing ofthe Complaint, all Defendants individually and collectively moved to

dismiss the Complaint, arguing among other things that Lead Plaintiffs had not satisfied the

heightened pleading standards of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA ),

and that Lead Plaintiffs lacked standing . On November 9, 2005, the Court issued an opinion denying

most of Defendants' motions to dismiss , but the Court dismissed with prejudice all claims against

the William C. Adair, Jr. Trust and it dismissed claims against E&Y asserted under the Exchange

Act, and dismissed certain claims under the Securities Act.

Following denial of Defendants' motions to dismiss, Lead Plaintiffs commenced formal

discovery. In February 2006, Lead Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Class Certification. Over the

following three months, the parties engaged in document and deposition discovery related to class

certification, including the depositions of Lead Plaintiffs and their market efficiency expert.

Thereafter, all Defendants filed briefs in opposition to Lead Plaintiffs' Motion for Class

Certification. On August 8, 2006, the Court certified a class consisting of all purchasers of the

securities of Direct General between August 11, 2003 and January 26, 2005, inclusive , including

those who purchased shares of Direct General common stock issued pursuant to or traceable to

Direct General's August 11, 2003 Registration Statement/Prospectus and Direct General's March 23,

2004 Registration Statement/Prospectus.

-2-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 3 of

Page 4: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

On January 23, 2007, the parties participated in mediation with the Honorable Daniel L.

Weinstein (Ret.). At the mediation, the Settling Parties reached an agreement-in-principle to settle

the Litigation. Thereafter, on March 2, 2007, the parties executed a Memorandum ofUnderstanding.

II. DEFENDANTS' DENIALS OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY

The Defendants have denied and continue to deny each and all ofthe claims and contentions

alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs in the Litigation. The Defendants expressly have denied and continue

to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out of any of the conduct,

statements , acts or omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Litigation. The

Defendants also have denied and continue to deny, inter alia, the allegations that the Lead Plaintiffs

or Class Members have suffered damage, that the price of Direct General common stock was

artificially inflated by reasons of alleged misrepresentations , non-disclosures or otherwise, that the

Lead Plaintiffs or Class Members can prove that any alleged statements caused their losses , or that

the Lead Plaintiffs or the Class were otherwise harmed by the conduct alleged in the Litigation.

Nonetheless, the Defendants have concluded that further conduct of the Litigation could be

protracted and expensive , and that it is desirable that the Litigation be fully and finally settled in the

manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation. The Defendants also have

taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in complex cases

like the Litigation. The Defendants have, therefore, determined that it is desirable and beneficial to

them that the Litigation be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this

Stipulation.

III. CLAIMS OF THE LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND BENEFITS OFSETTLEMENT

The Lead Plaintiffs believe that the claims asserted in the Litigation have merit. However,

counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued

proceedings necessary to prosecute the Litigation against the Defendants through trial and through

-3-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 4 of

Page 5: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

appeals. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and the

risk of any litigation, especially in complex actions such as the Litigation, as well as the difficulties

and delays inherent in such litigation. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs also are mindful of the

inherent problems of proof under and possible defenses to the violations alleged in the Litigation.

Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs believe that the settlement set forth in this Stipulation confers

substantial benefits upon the Class and is in the best interest of the Class.

IV. TERMS OF STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

Lead Plaintiffs (for themselves and the Class Members) and the Defendants, by and through their

respective counsel or attorneys ofrecord, that, subject to the approval ofthe Court, the Litigation and

the Released Claims shall be finally and fully compromised, settled and released, and the Litigation

shall be dismissed with prejudice, as to all Settling Parties, upon and subject to the terms and

conditions of the Stipulation, as follows.

1. Definitions

As used in the Stipulation the following terms have the meanings specified below:

1.1 "Authorized Claimant means any Class Member whose claim for recovery has been

allowed pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation.

1.2 "Claimant means any Class Member who files a Proof of Claim in such form and

manner, and within such time, as the Court shall prescribe.

1.3 "Claims Administrator means the firm of Gilardi & Co. LLC.

1.4 "Class means a class consisting of all Persons (other than those Persons who timely

and validly request exclusion from the Class) who purchased the common stock of Direct General

between August 11, 2003 and January 26, 2005, inclusive, including those who purchased shares of

Direct General common stock issued pursuant to or traceable to Direct General's August 11, 2003

Registration Statement/Prospectus, and Direct General's March 23, 2004 Registration

-4-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 5 of

Page 6: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

Statement/Prospectus. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, members ofthe immediate families

of the Defendants, any entity in which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest, present or

former directors and officers of Direct General, any of the Underwriter Defendants , and E&Y, and

the legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns of any such Defendant.

1.5 "Class Member or "Member of the Class mean a Person who falls within the

definition of the Class as set forth in ¶1.4 of the Stipulation. Insofar as a Class Member makes a

proper and timely request for exclusion from the Class, he, she, or it shall not be considered a Class

Member.

1.6

2005.

1.7

Defendants.

1.8

"Class Period means the period commencing on August 11, 2003 to January 26,

"Defendants means the Direct General Defendants , E&Y and the Underwriter

"Direct General Defendants means Direct General , William C. Adair, Jr., Tammy R.

Adair, Jacqueline C. Adair, Barry D. Elkins, Brian G. Moore, Fred H. Medling, Raymond L.

Osterhout and Stephen L. Rohde.

1.9 "Effective Date means the first date by which all of the events and conditions

specified in ¶7.1 of the Stipulation have been met and have occurred.

1.10 "Escrow Agent means the law firm of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman &

Robbins LLP.

1.11 "Final means: (a) the date of final affirmance on an appeal of the Judgment, the

expiration ofthe time for a petition for or a denial ofa writ of certiorari to review the Judgment and,

if certiorari is granted, the date offinal affirmance ofthe Judgment following review pursuant to that

grant; or (b) the date of final dismissal ofany appeal from the Judgment or the final dismissal of any

proceeding on certiorari to review the Judgment; or (c) ifno appeal is filed, the expiration date ofthe

-5-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 6 of

Page 7: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

time for the filing or noticing of any appeal from the Court's Judgment approving the Stipulation

substantially in the form and content of Exhibit B hereto, i.e., thirty (30) days after entry of the

Judgment. Any proceeding or order, or any appeal or petition for a writ of certiorari pertaining

solely to any plan of allocation and/or application for attorneys' fees, costs or expenses, shall not in

any way delay or preclude the Judgment from becoming Final.

1.12 "Judgment means the judgment to be rendered by the Court substantially in the form

and content attached hereto as Exhibit B.

1.13 "Lead Counsel means Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP.

1.14 "Lead Plaintiffs means the Structural Ironworkers Local Union #1 Annuity, Pension

and Welfare Funds and John Dzaugis.

1.15 "Notice Order means the preliminary order as approved by the Court for mailing and

publication of notice.

1.16 "Person means an individual, corporation, limited liability corporation, professional

corporation, limited liability partnership, partnership, limited partnership, association , joint stock

company, estate, legal representative, trust, unincorporated association, government or any political

subdivision or agency thereof, and any business or legal entity and their spouses, heirs, predecessors,

successors, representatives, or assignees.

1.17 "Plaintiffs means each of the plaintiffs who filed a complaint in the Litigation.

1.18 "Plaintiffs' Counsel means counsel who have appeared for any of the Plaintiffs in

the Litigation.

1.19 "Plan of Allocation means a plan or formula of allocation of the Settlement Fund

whereby the Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants after payment ofexpenses

of notice and administration of the settlement, Taxes and Tax Expenses and such attorneys' fees,

-6-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 7 of

Page 8: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

costs , expenses and interest as may be awarded by the Court. Any Plan of Allocation is not part of

the Stipulation and Defendants shall have no responsibility or liability with respect thereto.

1.20 "Related Persons means each of a Defendant's (including its predecessors,

successors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, joint ventures, and related or affiliated entities) past or

present directors, officers, managers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents, underwriters,

insurers and co-insurers and their reinsurers, controlling shareholders, venture capital investors,

attorneys, accountants or auditors, banks or investment banks, financial advisors, associates,

personal or legal representatives, assigns, spouses, heirs, any entity in which a Defendant has a

controlling interest, any members oftheir immediate families, or any trust ofwhich any Defendant is

the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his or her family.

1.21 "Released Claims shall collectively mean all claims (including "Unknown Claims

as defined in ¶1.28 hereof), demands, rights, liabilities and causes of action of every nature and

description under federal or state law, whether based upon statutory or common law, whether class

or individual in nature, known or unknown, concealed or hidden, that either were asserted or could

have been asserted , by the Lead Plaintiffs or any Class Member against the Released Parties arising

out of or relating to the purchase of Direct General common stock during the Class Period, and the

acts, facts, statements , or omissions that were or could have been alleged in the Litigation.

1.22 "Released Parties means each and all of the Defendants and their Related Persons.

1.23 "Settled Defendants' Claims means all claims (including, but not limited to,

"Unknown Claims as defined in ¶1.28 hereof), demands, losses , rights, and causes of action ofany

nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, whether suspected or unsuspected, whether

concealed or hidden, that have been or could have been asserted in the Litigation or any forum by the

Defendants or any ofthem or the successors and assigns of any ofthem against the Lead Plaintiffs,

Class Members and Plaintiffs' Counsel which arise out of or relate in any way to the institution,

-7-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 8 of

Page 9: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

prosecution, assertion, settlement, or resolution of the Litigation (except for claims to enforce the

Stipulation).

1.24 "Settlement Fund means the principal amount of Fourteen Million Nine Hundred

Forty Thousand Dollars ($14,940,000) in cash, plus any accrued interest pursuant to ¶12.1 and 2.3.

1.25 "Settling Parties means, collectively, each ofthe Defendants and the Lead Plaintiffs

on behalf of themselves and Members of the Class.

1.26 "Supplemental Agreement means the agreement described in ¶7.5 hereof.

1.27 "Underwriter Defendants means Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., Morgan Keegan &

Co. Inc., U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey.

1.28 "Unknown Claims means any Released Claims that the Lead Plaintiffs or Class

Members do not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of the

Released Parties, and any Settled Defendants' Claims that any Defendant does not know or suspect

to exist in his, her, or its favor, which, ifknown by him, her, or it, might have affected his, her, or its

settlement with and release ofthe Released Parties, or might have affected his, her, or its decision(s)

with respect to the settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims and Settled Defendants'

Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, Lead Plaintiffs and the

Defendants shall expressly waive, and each of the Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by

operation ofthe Judgment shall have, expressly waived the provisions, rights, and benefits conferred

by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, which is

similar , comparable or equivalent to California Civil Code § 1542, which provides:

A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not knowor suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which ifknown by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with thedebtor.

The Lead Plaintiffs and Class Members may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from

those that any ofthem now knows or believes to be true related to the subject matter ofthe Released

-8-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 9 of

Page 10: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

Claims, but the Lead Plaintiffs shall expressly and each Class Member, upon the Effective Date,

shall be deemed to have , and by operation ofJudgment shall have , fully, finally, and forever settled

and released any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent

or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed

upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but

not limited to, conduct that is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach ofany duty,

law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional

facts. Similarly, the Defendants and Released Parties may hereafter discover facts in addition to or

different from those that any ofthem now know or believe to be true related to the subject matter of

the Settled Defendants' Claims, but each Defendant shall expressly and each Released Party, upon

the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have fully,

finally, and forever settled and released any and all Settled Defendants' Claims, known or unknown,

suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent , whether or not concealed or hidden, which

now exist , or heretofore have existed upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into

existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct that is negligent, intentional, with or

without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or

existence of such different or additional facts. The Settling Parties acknowledge, and the Class

Members and the Released Parties shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have

acknowledged, that the inclusion of "Unknown Claims in the definition of Released Claims and

Settled Defendants' Claims was separately bargained for and is a key element of the settlement of

which these releases are a part.

2. The Settlement

a. The Settlement Fund

2.1 The principal amount ofFourteen Million Nine Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars and

no cents ($14,940,000.00) shall be paid or caused to be paid by Defendants in accordance with ¶2.2,

-9-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 10 of 88 q

Page 11: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

into an interest bearing account maintained by the Escrow Agent in settlement of the Litigation

within ten ( 10) business days following the Court 's issuance of the Notice Order or April 10, 2007,

whichever is later ("Due Date ). Any Defendant not paying his, her, or its contribution to the

Settlement Fund as set forth below in ¶2.2 will owe interest at the rate of 6% per annum, on such

unpaid contributions portion from the Due Date until the monies are deposited into the escrow

account.

2.2 Defendants and their insurance carriers shall contribute to the Settlement Fund as

follows: (a) $11,400,000 to be paid by the Direct General Defendants ' insurers ; (b) $2,940,000 to be

paid by the Direct General Defendants ; (c) $300,000 to be paid by Ernst & Young LLP; and (d)

$300,000 to be paid by Direct General on behalf of the Underwriter Defendants which shall reduce

by $300,000 Direct General's obligation to indemnify the Underwriter Defendants for reasonable

legal fees and expenses pursuant to the underwriting agreements entered into in connection with

Direct General's initial public offering on August 11, 2003 and secondary public offering on March

23, 2004.

b. The Escrow Agent

2.3 The Escrow Agent shall invest the Settlement Fund deposited pursuant to ¶2.1 above

in short-term instruments backed by the full faith and credit ofthe United States Government or fully

insured by the United States Government or an agency thereof and shall reinvest the proceeds of

these instruments as they mature in similar instruments at their then current market rates. The

Escrow Agent shall bear all risks related to investment of the Settlement Fund.

2.4 The Escrow Agent shall not disburse the Settlement Fund except as provided in the

Stipulation , by an order of the Court, or with the written agreement of counsel for Direct General,

Direct General' s insurers and Lead Counsel.

-10-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88 q

Page 12: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

2.5 Subject to further order and/or direction as may be made by the Court, the Escrow

Agent is authorized to execute such transactions on behalf of Class Members as are consistent with

the terms of the Stipulation.

2.6 All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered to be in custodia

legis , and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction ofthe Court, until such time as such funds shall be

distributed pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order(s) of the Court.

2.7 The Escrow Agent may pay from the Settlement Fund, without further approval from

the Defendants or the Court, the costs and expenses reasonably and actually incurred in connection

with providing notice to the Class, locating Class Members, soliciting Class claims, assisting with

the filing of claims, administering and distributing the Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants,

processing Proof of Claim and Release forms and paying escrow fees and costs, if any.

c. Taxes

2.8 (a) The Settling Parties agree that the Settlement Fund is intended to be a

"qualified settlement fund within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.468B-1. Settling Parties agree that

the Settlement Fund should be treated as being at all times a "qualified settlement fund within the

meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.468B-1. In addition, the Escrow Agent shall timely make such elections

as necessary or advisable to carry out the provisions of this ¶2.8, including the "relation-back

election (as defined in Treas. Reg. § 1.468B-1) back to the earliest permitted date. Such elections

shall be made in compliance with the procedures and requirements contained in such regulations. It

shall be the responsibility of the Escrow Agent to timely and properly prepare and deliver the

necessary documentation for signature by all necessary parties, and thereafter to cause the

appropriate filing to occur.

(b) For the purpose of §468B ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,

and the regulations promulgated thereunder, the "administrator shall be the Escrow Agent. The

-11-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 12 of

Page 13: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

Escrow Agent shall timely and properly file all informational and other tax returns necessary or

advisable with respect to the Settlement Fund (including without limitation the returns described in

Treas. Reg. §1.468B-2(k)(1)). Such returns (as well as the election described in ¶2.8) shall be

consistent with this ¶2.8 and in all events shall reflect that all Taxes (including any estimated Taxes,

interest or penalties) on the income earned by the Settlement Fund shall be paid out ofthe Settlement

Fund as provided in ¶2.8(c) hereof.

(c) All (i) Taxes (including any estimated Taxes, interest or penalties) arising

with respect to the income earned by the Settlement Fund, including any Taxes or tax detriments that

may be imposed upon the Defendants with respect to any income earned by the Settlement Fund for

any period during which the Settlement Fund does not qualify as a "qualified settlement fund for

federal or state income tax purposes ("Taxes ), and (ii) expenses and costs incurred in connection

with the operation and implementation of this ¶2.8 (including, without limitation, expenses of tax

attorneys and/or accountants and mailing and distribution costs and expenses relating to filing (or

failing to file) the returns described in this ¶2.8) ("Tax Expenses ), shall be paid out of the

Settlement Fund; in all events neither the Defendants nor their counsel shall have any liability or

responsibility for the Taxes or the Tax Expenses. The Escrow Agent shall indemnify and hold each

of the Defendants and their counsel harmless for Taxes and Tax Expenses (including, without

limitation, Taxes payable by reason ofany such indemnification). Further, Taxes and Tax Expenses

shall be treated as, and considered to be, a cost ofadministration ofthe Settlement Fund and shall be

timely paid by the Escrow Agent out of the Settlement Fund without prior order from the Court and

the Escrow Agent shall be obligated (notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary) to withhold

from distribution to Authorized Claimants any funds necessary to pay such amounts including the

establishment of adequate reserves for any Taxes and Tax Expenses (as well as any amounts that

may be required to be withheld under Treas. Reg. §1.468B-2(1)(2)); neither the Defendants, the

-12-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 13 of

Page 14: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

insurance carriers , nor their counsel are responsible , nor shall they have any liability therefor. The

Settling Parties hereto agree to cooperate with the Escrow Agent, each other, and their tax attorneys

and accountants to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this ¶2.8.

d. Termination of Settlement

2.9 In the event that the Stipulation is not approved, or is terminated, canceled, or the

Effective Date does not occur, the Settlement Fund (including accrued interest) less expenses

actually incurred or due and owing in connection with the settlement provided for herein, shall be

refunded directly to each of the persons or entities contributing to the Settlement Fund as described

in ¶7.6 below.

3. Notice Order and Settlement Hearing

3.1 Promptly after execution of the Stipulation, the Settling Parties shall submit the

Stipulation together with its Exhibits to the Court and shall apply for entry of an order (the "Notice

Order ), substantially in the form and content of Exhibit A hereto, requesting, inter alia, the

preliminary approval of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and approval for the mailing of a

settlement notice (the "Notice ) and publication of a summary notice (the "Summary Notice ),

substantially in the form and content of Exhibits A-1 and A-3 hereto. The Notice shall include the

general terms of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, the proposed Plan of Allocation, the

general terms of the Fee and Expense Application as defined in ¶6.1 below, and the date of the

Settlement Hearing as defined below.

3.2 Lead Counsel shall request that after notice is given, the Court hold a hearing (the

"Settlement Hearing ) and approve the settlement ofthe Litigation as set forth herein. At or after the

Settlement Hearing, Lead Counsel also will request that the Court approve the proposed Plan of

Allocation and the Fee and Expense Application.

-13 -

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 14 of

Page 15: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

4. Releases

4.1 Upon the Effective Date, as defined in ¶1.9 hereof, the Lead Plaintiffs and each Class

Member shall be deemed to have fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged all

Released Claims whether or not such Class Member for themselves and their predecessors,

successors , heirs and assigns executes and delivers the Proof of Claim and Release form.

4.2 Upon the Effective Date, as defined in ¶1.9 hereof, each ofthe Released Parties shall

be deemed to have , and by operation ofthe Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released,

relinquished and discharged the Lead Plaintiffs, each and all of the Class Members, and their

counsel, from all Settled Defendants' Claims.

5. Administration and Calculation of Claims, Final Awards andSupervision and Distribution of the Settlement Fund

5.1 The Claims Administrator, subject to such supervision and direction of the Court or

Lead Counsel, as may be necessary or as circumstances may require, shall administer and calculate

the claims submitted by Class Members and shall oversee distribution of the Net Settlement Fund

(defined below) to Authorized Claimants. The Settlement Fund shall be applied as follows:

(a) to pay all the costs and expenses reasonably and actually incurred in

connection with providing notice, locating Class Members, soliciting Class claims, assisting with the

filing of claims, administering and distributing the Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants,

processing Proof of Claim and Release forms and paying escrow fees and costs, if any;

(b) to pay the Taxes and Tax Expenses described in ¶2.8 above;

(c) to pay to Lead Counsel attorneys' fees, expenses and costs with interest

thereon (the "Fee and Expense Award ), and to pay Lead Plaintiffs' expenses (including lost wages)

incurred in representing the Class if and to the extent allowed by the Court; and

(d) to distribute the balance of the Settlement Fund (the "Net Settlement Fund )

to Authorized Claimants as allowed by the Stipulation, the Plan of Allocation, or the Court.

- 14-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 15 of

Page 16: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

5.2 Upon the Effective Date and thereafter, and in accordance with the terms of the

Stipulation , the Plan ofAllocation, or such further approval and further order(s) ofthe Court as may

be necessary or as circumstances may require, the Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to

Authorized Claimants, subject to and in accordance with the following.

5.3 Within ninety (90) days after the mailing of the Notice or such other time as may be

set by the Court, each Person claiming to be an Authorized Claimant shall be required to submit to

the Claims Administrator a completed Proof of Claim and Release, substantially in the form of

Exhibit A-2 hereto , signed under penalty ofperjury and supported by such documents as specified in

the Proof of Claim and Release and as are reasonably available to the Authorized Claimant.

5.4 Except as otherwise ordered by the Court, all Class Members who fail to timely

submit a Proof of Claim and Release within such period, or such other period as may be ordered by

the Court, or otherwise allowed, shall be forever barred from receiving any payments pursuant to this

Stipulation and the settlement set forth herein, but will in all other respects be subject to and bound

by the provisions of this Stipulation, the releases contained herein, and the Judgment.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lead Counsel may in their discretion, accept for processing late filed

claims so long as the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants is not

materially delayed.

5.5 The Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to the Authorized Claimants

substantially in accordance with a Plan ofAllocation to be described in the Notice and approved by

the Court.

5.6 Except for their obligation to pay or cause payment ofthe $14,940,000, and interest if

applicable pursuant to ¶2.1, and to reasonably cooperate in the production of information from

Direct General's transfer agent for purposes ofproviding notice as provided herein, the Defendants

and the Released Parties shall have no responsibility for, interest in, or liability whatsoever with

-15-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 16 of

Page 17: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

respect to the investment or distribution of the Settlement Fund, the Plan of Allocation, the

determination, administration, or calculation of claims, the payment or withholding ofTaxes, or any

losses incurred in connection therewith.

5.7 No Person shall have any claim against Lead Counsel, the Lead Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs,

any claims administrator, or Defendants or the Released Parties based on the distributions made

substantially in accordance with this Stipulation and the settlement contained herein, the Plan of

Allocation, or further order(s) of the Court.

5.8 The Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to the Authorized Claimants

substantially in accordance with a Plan ofAllocation to be described in the Notice and approved by

the Court. However, if there is any balance remaining in the Net Settlement Fund after six (6)

months from the date of distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (whether by reason of tax refunds,

uncashed checks or otherwise) Lead Counsel shall reallocate such balance among Authorized

Claimants in an equitable and economic fashion. Thereafter, any balance which still remains in the

Net Settlement Fund shall be donated to an appropriate non-profit organization.

5.9 It is understood and agreed by the Settling Parties that any proposed Plan of

Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund including, but not limited to, any adjustments to an

Authorized Claimant's claim set forth therein, is not a part of the Stipulation and is to be considered

by the Court separately from the Court' s consideration ofthe fairness , reasonableness and adequacy

of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and any order or proceeding relating to the Plan of

Allocation shall not operate to terminate or cancel the Stipulation or affect the finality ofthe Court's

Judgment approving the Stipulation and the settlement set forth therein, or any other orders entered

pursuant to the Stipulation.

-16-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 17 of

Page 18: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

6. Lead Counsel's Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses ofCounsel and the Lead Plaintiffs

6.1 Lead Counsel may submit an application or applications (the "Fee and Expense

Application ) for distributions to them from the Settlement Fund for: (a) an award ofattorneys' fees;

plus (b) reimbursement ofexpenses and costs incurred in connection with prosecuting the Litigation,

plus any interest on such attorneys' fees, costs and expenses at the same rate and for the same

periods as earned by the Settlement Fund (until paid) as may be awarded by the Court and

reimbursement of the expenses (including lost wages of the Lead Plaintiffs). Lead Counsel reserve

the right to make additional applications for fees and expenses incurred.

6.2 The attorneys' fees, expenses and costs, including the fees ofexperts and consultants,

as awarded by the Court, shall be payable to Lead Counsel from the Settlement Fund, as ordered,

immediately after the Court executes an order awarding such fees and expenses. Lead Counsel shall

thereafter allocate the attorneys' fees amongst Plaintiffs' Counsel in a manner in which they in good

faith believe reflects the contributions of such counsel to the prosecution and settlement of the

Litigation.

6.3 In the event that the Effective Date does not occur, or the Judgment or the order

making the Fee and Expense Award is reversed or modified, or the Stipulation is terminated, and in

the event that any Fee and Expense Award has been paid to any extent, then each Plaintiffs' Counsel,

including Lead Counsel, shall within ten (10) business days from receiving notice from Defendants'

counsel or from a court ofappropriate jurisdiction, refund to the Settlement Fund, any fees , expenses

and costs previously paid or otherwise transferred to them from the Settlement Fund plus interest

thereon at the same rate as earned on the Settlement Fund: (a) in the full amount ifthe Effective Date

does not occur or the Stipulation is terminated, less notice and administration expenses already

incurred or due and owing, or (b) in such other amount corresponding to that portion ofany Fee and

Expense Award that is reversed or modified. Each such Plaintiffs' Counsel's law firm, as a

- 17-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 18 of

Page 19: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

condition ofreceiving such fees and expenses, on behalfofitself and each partner and/or shareholder

of it, agrees that the law firm and its partners and/or shareholders are subject to the jurisdiction ofthe

Court for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this paragraph.

6.4 The procedure for and the allowance or disallowance by the Court ofany applications

by Lead Plaintiffs or Lead Counsel for attorneys' fees, costs and expenses to be paid out of the

Settlement Fund, are not part of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and are to be considered

by the Court separately from the Court 's consideration ofthe fairness, reasonableness and adequacy

of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and any order or proceeding relating to the Fee and

Expense Application, or any appeal from any order relating thereto or reversal or modification

thereof, shall not operate to terminate or cancel the Stipulation, or affect or delay the finality of the

Judgment approving the Stipulation and the settlement of the Litigation set forth therein.

6.5 Defendants and the Released Parties shall have no responsibility for, and no liability

whatsoever with respect to, any payment to Plaintiffs' Counsel from the Settlement Fund.

6.6 Defendants and the Released Parties shall have no responsibility for, and no liability

whatsoever with respect to, the allocation among Plaintiffs' Counsel, and/or any other Person who

may assert some claim thereto, of any Fee and Expense Award that the Court may make in the

Litigation.

7. Conditions of Settlement, Effect of Disapproval, Cancellation orTermination

7.1 The Effective Date ofthe Stipulation shall be conditioned on the occurrence ofall of

the following events:

(a) Defendants have timely made, or caused to be made, their contributions to the

Settlement Fund as required by ¶12.1-2-2 above;

(b) Defendants have not exercised their option to terminate the Stipulation

pursuant to ¶7.5 hereof;

- 18-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 19 of

Page 20: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

(c) the Court has entered the Judgment, or a judgment substantially in the form

and content of Exhibit B attached hereto, or a judgment in a form other than that provided above

("Alternate Judgment ) acceptable to all of the Settling Parties; and

(d) the Judgment (or the Alternate Judgment) has become Final, as defined in

¶1.11 hereof.

7.2 Upon the occurrence of all of the events referenced in ¶7.1 hereof, any and all

remaining interest or right ofDefendants in or to the Settlement Fund, if any, shall be absolutely and

forever extinguished.

7.3 Defendants' or Lead Counsel shall each have the right to terminate the settlement and

this Stipulation by providing written notice of their election to do so ("Termination Notice ) to all

other parties hereto within thirty (30) days of: (a) the Court's declining to enter the Notice Order in

any material respect; (b) the Court's refusal to approve this Stipulation or any material part of it; (c)

the Court's declining to enter the Judgment in any material respect; (d) the date upon which the

Judgment is modified or reversed in any material respect by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme

Court; or (e) the date upon which an Alternate Judgment is modified or reversed in any material

respect by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.

7.4 If all of the conditions specified in ¶7.1 are not met, then the Stipulation shall be

canceled and terminated subject to ¶7.7 unless Lead Counsel and Defendants mutually agree in

writing to proceed with the Stipulation.

7.5 In addition to the grounds for termination ofthe settlement in ¶7.3, Defendants shall

have the option to terminate the settlement in the event that Persons who would otherwise be Class

Members who purchased more than a certain number of shares of Direct General common stock

during the Class Period choose to exclude themselves from the Class, as set forth in a separate

-19-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 20 of

Page 21: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

agreement (the "Supplemental Agreement ) executed among the Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants,

which is incorporated into this Stipulation.

7.6 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, in the event the Stipulation shall terminate, or

be canceled, or shall not become effective for any reason, within five (5) business days after written

notification of such event is sent by counsel for Defendants or Lead Counsel, the Settlement Fund

(including accrued interest), less any notice and administration expenses and costs paid or payable

from the Settlement Fund, shall be refunded by the Escrow Agent pursuant to written instructions

from counsel for Defendants. At the request of counsel for Defendants, the Escrow Agent or its

designee shall apply for any tax refund owed to the Settlement Fund and pay the proceeds, after

deduction of any fees or expenses incurred in connection with such application(s) for refund, to

Direct General.

7.7 In the event that the Stipulation is not approved by the Court or the settlement set

forth in the Stipulation is terminated or fails to become effective in accordance with its terms, the

Settling Parties shall be restored to their respective positions in the Litigation as of March 1, 2007.

In such event, the terms and provisions ofthe Stipulation, with the exception of¶¶1.1-1.28, 2.3-2.8,

7.3-7.7, 8.1-8.5 , 8.9-8.14 herein, shall have no further force and effect with respect to the Settling

Parties and shall not be used in the Litigation or in any other proceeding for any purpose, and any

judgment or order entered by the Court in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation shall be

treated as vacated, nuncpro tunc. No order ofthe Court or modification or reversal on appeal ofany

order of the Court concerning the Plan of Allocation or the amount of any attorneys' fees, costs,

expenses and interest awarded by the Court to the Lead Plaintiffs or any of their counsel shall

constitute grounds for cancellation or termination ofthe Stipulation. Ifthe Stipulation is terminated

pursuant to its terms , neither the Lead Plaintiffs, nor any oftheir counsel shall have any obligation to

-20-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 21 of

Page 22: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

repay any amounts paid or payable from Settlement Fund for notice and administration of the

settlement.

8. Miscellaneous Provisions

8.1 The Settling Parties: (a) acknowledge that it is their intent to consummate this

agreement; and (b) agree to cooperate to the extent reasonably necessary to effectuate and implement

all terms and conditions of this Stipulation and to exercise their best efforts to accomplish the

foregoing terms and conditions of this Stipulation.

8.2 Each Defendant warrants as to himself or itself that, at the time any of the payments

provided for herein are made on behalf ofhimself or itself, he or it is not insolvent and the payment

will not render him or it insolvent. This representation is made by each Defendant as to himself or

itself only, and is not made by counsel for the Defendants.

8.3 If a case is commenced in respect to Direct General (or any Defendant or insurer

contributing funds to the Settlement Fund) under Title 11 ofthe United States Code (Bankruptcy), or

a trustee, receiver or conservator is appointed under any similar law, and in the event of the entry of

a final order of a court ofcompetent jurisdiction determining the transfer ofmoney to the Settlement

Fund or any portion thereof by or on behalf of Defendants to be a preference, voidable transfer,

fraudulent transfer or similar transaction and any portion thereof is required to be returned, and such

amount is not promptly deposited to the Settlement Fund by other Defendants, then, at the election

of Lead Counsel, the parties shall jointly move the Court to vacate and set aside the releases given

and Judgment entered in favor of the Defendants, which releases and Judgment shall be null and

void, and the parties shall be restored to their respective positions in the Litigation as of March 1,

2007, and any cash amounts in the Settlement Fund shall be returned as provided in ¶7.6 above.

8.4 The Settling Parties intend this settlement to be a final and complete resolution of all

disputes between them with respect to the Litigation. The settlement compromises claims which are

-21-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 22 of

Page 23: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

contested and shall not be deemed an admission by any Settling Party as to the merits ofany claim or

defense. While retaining their right to deny that the claims advanced in the Litigation were

meritorious, Defendants will not contend that the Litigation was not filed in good faith. The Final

Judgment will contain a statement that during the course of the Litigation, the parties and their

respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

11, and that the Litigation is being settled voluntarily after consultation with competent legal

counsel. The Settling Parties agree that the amount paid to the Settlement Fund and the other terms

of the settlement were negotiated in good faith by the Settling Parties, and reflect a settlement that

was reached voluntarily after consultation with competent legal counsel. The Settling Parties reserve

their right to rebut, in a manner that such party determines to be appropriate, any contention made in

any public forum that the Litigation was brought or defended in bad faith or without a reasonable

basis.

8.5 Neither the Stipulation nor the settlement, nor any act performed or document

executed pursuant to or in furtherance ofthe Stipulation or the settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to

be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim or of any

wrongdoing or liability ofthe Defendants and the Released Parties; or (b) is or may be deemed to be

or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of the Defendants

and the Released Parties in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court,

administrative agency or other tribunal. Defendants and the Released Parties may file the Stipulation

and/or the Judgment in any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or

counterclaim based on principles of resjudicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement,

judgment bar or reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar

defense or counterclaim.

-22-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 23 of

Page 24: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

8.6 All of the Exhibits to this Stipulation are material and integral parts hereof and are

fully incorporated herein by this reference.

8.7 This Stipulation may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by

or on behalf of all Settling Parties or their respective successors-in-interest.

8.8 This Stipulation and the Exhibits attached hereto and the Supplemental Agreement

constitute the entire agreement between Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants and no representations,

warranties or inducements have been made to any party concerning the Stipulation or its Exhibits or

the Supplemental Agreement other than the representations, warranties and covenants contained and

memorialized in such documents. Except as otherwise provided herein, each party shall bear its own

costs.

8.9 Lead Counsel, on behalf ofthe Class, are expressly authorized by the Lead Plaintiffs

to take all appropriate action required or permitted to be taken by the Class pursuant to the

Stipulation to effectuate its terms and also are expressly authorized to enter into any modifications or

amendments to the Stipulation on behalf of the Class which they deem appropriate.

8.10 Each counsel or other Person executing the Stipulation or any of its Exhibits on

behalf of any party hereto hereby warrants that such Person has the full authority to do so.

8.11 This Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts. All executed

counterparts and each ofthem shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. A complete set of

original executed counterparts shall be filed with the Court.

8.12 This Stipulation shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and

assigns of the parties hereto.

8.13 The Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to implementation and enforcement of

the terms of this Stipulation , and all parties hereto submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for

purposes of implementing and enforcing the settlement embodied in this Stipulation.

-23-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 24 of

Page 25: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

8.14 This Stipulation and the Exhibits hereto shall be considered to have been negotiated,

executed and delivered, and to be wholly performed, in the State of Tennessee, and the rights and

obligations ofthe parties to this Stipulation shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and

governed by, the internal, substantive laws of the State of Tennessee without giving effect to that

State's choice-of-law principles.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Stipulation to be executed, by

their duly authorized attorneys, dated as of March 30, 2007.

BARRETT, JOHNSTON & PARSLEYGEORGE E. BARRETT, #2672DOUGLAS S. JOHNSTON, JR. #5782TIMOTHY L. MILES, #21605

s/ GEORGE E. BARRETTGEORGE E. BARRETT

217 Second Avenue, NorthNashville, TN 37201-1601Telephone: 615/244-2202615/252-3798 (fax)

Liaison Counsel

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLERRUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP

DARREN J. ROBBINSTOR GRONBORGJEFFREY D. LIGHTX. JAY ALVAREZRAMZI ABADOU

s/ JEFFREY D. LIGHTJEFFREY D. LIGHT

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900San Diego , CA 92101Telephone: 619/231-1058619/231-7423 (fax)

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

-24-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 25 of

Page 26: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

CAVANAGH & O'HARAWILLIAM K. CAVANAGH, JR.407 East Adams StreetSpringfield, IL 62701Telephone : 217/544-1771217/544-9894 (fax)

Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs

ALSTON &PETER Q. FSCOTT P:

One Atlantic Center1201 West Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309-3424Telephone: 404/881-7000404/881-7777 (fax)

BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.

MATTHEW SWEENEYJIM DELANIS211 Commerce Street, Suite 1000Nashville, TN 37201615/726-5600615/726-0464 (Fax)

Counsel for Direct General Defendants

BASS, BERRY & SIMS, PLCMICHAEL L. DAGLEYMATTHEW M. CURLEYBRIAN D. ROARK

MATTHEW M. CURLEY

315 Deaderick Street, Suite 2700Nashville, TN 37238-2700Telephone: 615/742-6200615/742-6293 (Fax)

-25 -

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 26 of

Page 27: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

CAVANAGH & O'HARAWILLIAM K. CAVANAGH, JR.407 East Adams StreetSpringfield , IL 62701Telephone : 217/544-1771217/544-9894 (fax)

Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs

ALSTON & BIRD, LLPPETER Q. BASSETTSCOTT P. HILSEN

SCOTT P. HILSEN

One Atlantic Center1201 West Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309-3424Telephone : 404/881-7000404/881-7777 (fax)

BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.

MATTHEW SWEENEYJIM DELANIS211 Commerce Street , Suite 1000Nashville, TN 37201615/726-5600615/726-0464 (Fax)

Counsel for Direct General Defendants

BASS, BERRY & SIMS, PLCMICHAEL L. DAGLEYMATTHEW M. CURLEYBRIAN D. ROARK

MATTHEW M. C(J EY

315 Deaderick Street, Suite 2700Nashville, TN 37238-2700Telephone: 615/742-6200615/742-6293 (Fax)

-25-

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 27 of

Page 28: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.

MATTHEW SWEENEYJIM DELANIS211 Commerce Street , Suite 1000Nashville, TN 37201615/726-5600615/726-0464 (Fax)

Counsel for Direct General Defendants

BASS , BERRY & SIMS, PLCMICHAEL L. DAGLEYMATTHEW M. CURLEYBRIAN D. ROARK

MATTHEW M. CURLEY

315 Deaderick Street , Suite 2700Nashville , TN 3723 8-2700Telephone: 615/742-6200615/742-6293 (Fax)

ERNST & YOUNG LLPBRUCE CORMIERANTOINETTE DECAMP1225 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington , DC 20036Telephone: 202/327-6000202/327-6200 (Fax)

Attorneys for Ernst & Young LLP

WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLPSTEPHEN W. GREINERANTONIO YANEZ, JR.

STEPHEN W. GREINER

787 Seventh AvenueNew York, NY 10019Telephone: 212/728-8000212/728-8111 (Fax)

-27-

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 28 of

Page 29: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

EXHIBIT A

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 29 of

Page 30: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION

In re DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATIONSECURITIES LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Civil Action No. 3:05-0077

Judge Todd J. CampbellMagistrate Judge Juliet E . Griffin

CLASS ACTION

ALL ACTIONS.

[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDINGFOR NOTICE

EXHIBIT A

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 30 of

Page 31: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

WHEREAS, a consolidated class action is pending before this Court entitled In re Direct

General Corporation Securities Litigation , Civil Action No. 3:05 -0077 (the "Litigation );

WHEREAS, the parties having made application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 23(e), for an order approving the settlement of this Litigation, in accordance with a

Stipulation of Settlement dated as of March 30, 2007 (the "Stipulation ), which, together with the

Exhibits annexed thereto sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed settlement of the

Litigation and for dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth

therein; and the Court having read and considered the Stipulation and the Exhibits annexed thereto;

and

WHEREAS, all defined terms contained herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in

the Stipulation.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Court does hereby preliminarily approve the Stipulation and the settlement set

forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing described below.

2. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby

certifies, for purposes of effectuating this settlement, a Class defined as all Persons (other than those

Persons who timely and validly request exclusion from the Class) who purchased the common stock

of Direct General Corporation ("Direct General ) between August 11, 2003 and January 26, 2005,

inclusive, including those who purchased shares ofDirect General common stock issued pursuant to

or traceable to Direct General's August 11, 2003 Registration Statement/Prospectus, and Direct

General's March 23, 2004 Registration Statement/Prospectus. Excluded from the Class are

Defendants, members of the immediate families of the Defendants, any entity in which any

Defendant has or had a controlling interest, present or former directors and officers of Direct

-1-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 31 of

Page 32: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

General , any of the Underwriter Defendants , and E&Y, and the legal representatives , heirs,

successors , or assigns of any such Defendant.

3. The Court finds, for the purposes of the settlement only, that the prerequisites for a

class action under Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been satisfied

in that: (a) the number of Class Members is so numerous that joinder of all members thereof is

impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the Class; (c) the claims of the

Lead Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the Class they seek to represent; (d) the Lead Plaintiffs

have and will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Class ; (e) the questions of law and

fact common to the Members ofthe Class predominate over any questions affecting only individual

Members of the Class; and (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and

efficient adjudication of the controversy.

4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Lead Plaintiffs are

certified as class representatives.

5. A hearing (the "Settlement Hearing ) shall be held before this Court on ,

2007, at _.m., at the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee,

Nashville Division, Estes Kefauver Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 801 Broadway,

Nashville, Tennessee, to determine whether the proposed settlement of the Litigation on the terms

and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable and adequate to the Class and

should be approved by the Court; whether a Judgment as provided in ¶1.12 ofthe Stipulation should

be entered herein; whether the proposed Plan ofAllocation should be approved; and to determine the

amount of fees and expenses that should be awarded to Lead Counsel . The Court may adjourn the

Settlement Hearing without further notice to Members of the Class.

6. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Pendency and Proposed

Settlement of Class Action (the "Notice ), the Proof of Claim and Release form (the "Proof of

-2-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 32 of

Page 33: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

Claim ), and Summary Notice annexed as Exhibits A-1, A-2 and A-3 hereto , and finds that the

mailing and distribution of the Notice and publishing of the Summary Notice substantially in the

manner and form set forth in this Order meet the requirements ofFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 23,

§21D(a)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(7) as amended by the

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and due process , and is the best notice practicable

under the circumstances and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto.

7. Lead Counsel are hereby authorized to retain the firm ofGilardi & Co. LLC ("Claims

Administrator ) to supervise and administer the notice procedure as well as the processing ofclaims

as more fully set forth below:

(a) Not later than , 2007 (the "Notice Date ), the Claims

Administrator shall cause a copy of the Notice and the Proof of Claim, substantially in the form

annexed as Exhibits A-1 and A-2 hereto , to be mailed by first class mail to all Class Members who

can be identified with reasonable effort;

(b) Not later than , 2007, the Claims Administrator shall cause the

Summary Notice to be published once in Investor's Business Daily; and

(c) At least seven (7) days prior to the Settlement Hearing, Lead Counsel shall

serve on Defendants' counsel and file with the Court proof, by affidavit or declaration , of such

mailing and publishing.

8. Nominees who purchased Direct General common stock during the period beginning

August 11, 2003 to January 26, 2005 for the beneficial ownership of another Person shall send the

Notice and the Proof of Claim to such beneficial owners of such Direct General common stock

within ten (10) days after receipt thereof, or send a list ofthe names and addresses ofsuch beneficial

owners to the Claims Administrator within ten (10) days ofreceipt thereofin which event the Claims

Administrator shall promptly mail the Notice and Proof of Claim to such beneficial owners.

-3-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 33 of

Page 34: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

9. All Members of the Class shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in the

Litigation concerning the settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable to the Class.

10. Class Members who wish to participate in the settlement shall complete and submit

ProofofClaim forms in accordance with the instructions contained therein. Unless the Court orders

otherwise, all Proof ofClaim forms must be submitted no later than ninety (90) days from the Notice

Date. Any Class Member who does not timely submit a ProofofClaim within the time provided for,

shall be barred from sharing in the distribution of the proceeds of the Settlement Fund, unless

otherwise ordered by the Court, but shall nevertheless be bound by any Final Judgment entered by

the Court.

11. Any Member of the Class may enter an appearance in the Litigation, at his , her or its

own expense, individually or through counsel of their own choice. If they do not enter an

appearance , they will be represented by Lead Counsel.

12. Pending final determination ofwhether the settlement should be approved, neither the

Lead Plaintiffs nor any Class Member, either directly, representatively, or in any other capacity,

shall commence or prosecute against any of the Released Parties, any action or proceeding in any

court or tribunal asserting any of the Released Claims.

13. Any Person falling within the definition ofthe Class may, upon request, be excluded

from the Class. Any such Person must submit to the Claims Administrator a request for exclusion

("Request for Exclusion ), postmarked no later than , 2007. A Request for Exclusion

must be signed and state: (a) the name, address, and telephone number of the Person requesting

exclusion; (b) the Person's purchases and sales of Direct General common stock made during the

Class Period, including the dates, the number of shares purchased, and price paid or received for

each such purchase or sale ; and (c) that the Person wishes to be excluded from the Class. All

Persons who submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion in the manner set forth in this

-4-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 34 of

Page 35: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

paragraph shall have no rights under the Stipulation, shall not share in the distribution of the Net

Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the Stipulation or the Final Judgment.

14. Any Member ofthe Class may appear and show cause, if he, she or it has any reason

why the proposed settlement of the Litigation should not be approved as fair, reasonable and

adequate, or why a Judgment should not be entered thereon, why the Plan of Allocation should not

be approved, why attorneys' fees and expenses should not be awarded to counsel for the Lead

Plaintiffs or why Lead Plaintiffs' expenses (including lost wages) should not be awarded; provided,

however, that no Class Member or any other Person shall be heard or entitled to contest the approval

of the terms and conditions of the proposed settlement, or, if approved, the Judgment to be entered

thereon approving the same, or the order approving the Plan ofAllocation, or the attorneys' fees and

expenses to be awarded to counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs unless that Person has served on the

following counsel (delivered by hand or sent by first class mail) written objections and copies ofany

papers and briefs in support thereof on or before , 2007: Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller

Rudman & Robbins LLP, Jeffrey D. Light, 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 , San Diego, California

92101; Alston & Bird, LLP, Scott P . Hilsen , One Atlantic Center, 1201 West Peachtree Street,

Atlanta, GA 30309-3424, and filed said objections , papers and briefs with the Clerk of the United

States District Court, Middle District ofTennessee, Nashville Division on or before

2007. Any objection must contain a written notice ofthe grounds for opposing the settlement, Plan

of Allocation, application for attorneys' fees and expenses or Lead Plaintiffs ' expenses and must

demonstrate the objecting Person's membership in the Class by including: (a) the objecting Person's

name, address and telephone number; (b) formal proof of the number of shares of Direct General

common stock purchased and sold during the Class Period by the objecting Person; and (c) a

statement of the reasons for objection. Any Member ofthe Class who does not make his, her or its

objection in the manner provided shall be deemed to have waived such objection and shall forever be

-5-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 35 of

Page 36: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

foreclosed from making any objection to the fairness or adequacy of the proposed settlement as

incorporated in the Stipulation, to the Plan of Allocation, and to the award of attorneys' fees and

expenses to Lead Counsel and Lead Plaintiffs' expenses , unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

15. The passage of title and ownership of the Settlement Fund to the Escrow Agent in

accordance with the terms and obligations of the Stipulation is approved. No Person that is not a

Class Member or counsel to the Lead Plaintiffs shall have any right to any portion of, or in the

distribution of, the Settlement Fund unless otherwise ordered by the Court or otherwise provided in

the Stipulation.

16. All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered to be in custodia

legis , and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction ofthe Court, until such time as such funds shall be

distributed pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order(s) of the Court.

17. All papers in support ofthe settlement, the Plan ofAllocation, and any application by

counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs for attorneys' fees or reimbursement of expenses shall be filed with

the Court and served at least seven (7) days prior to the Settlement Hearing.

18. Neither Defendants nor Defendants' counsel shall have any responsibility for the Plan

ofAllocation or any application for reimbursement of attorneys' fees or reimbursement ofexpenses

submitted by Plaintiffs' Counsel, and such matters will be considered separately from the fairness,

reasonableness and adequacy of the settlement.

19. At or after the Settlement Hearing, the Court shall determine whether the Plan of

Allocation proposed by Lead Counsel, and any application for attorneys' fees or reimbursement of

expenses shall be approved.

20. All reasonable expenses incurred in identifying and notifying Class Members as well

as administering the Settlement Fund, shall be paid as set forth in the Stipulation. In the event the

settlement is not approved by the Court, or otherwise fails to become effective, neither the Lead

-6-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 36 of

Page 37: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

Plaintiffs nor any of their counsel shall have any obligation to repay any amounts actually and

properly disbursed from the Settlement Fund for such reasonable expenses.

21. Neither the Stipulation, nor any of its terms or provisions , nor any ofthe negotiations

or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an admission or concession by Defendants of

the truth of any of the allegations in the Litigation, or of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any

kind.

22. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the date of the Settlement Hearing without

further notice to the Members of the Class, and retains jurisdiction to consider all further

applications arising out of or connected with the proposed settlement. The Court may approve the

settlement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Settling Parties, if appropriate,

without further notice to the Class.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:THE HONORABLE TODD J. CAMPBELLUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Submitted by,

BARRETT, JOHNSTON & PARSLEYGEORGE E. BARRETT, #2672DOUGLAS S. JOHNSTON, JR. #5782TIMOTHY L. MILES, #21605

GEORGE E. BARRETT

217 Second Avenue, NorthNashville, TN 37201-1601Telephone: 615/244-2202615/252-3798 (fax)

Liaison Counsel

-7-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 37 of

Page 38: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLERRUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP

DARREN J. ROBBINSTOR GRONBORGJEFFREY D. LIGHTX. JAY ALVAREZRAMZIABADOU655 West Broadway, Suite 1900San Diego, CA 92101Telephone : 619/231-1058619/231-7423 (fax)

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

CAVANAGH & O'HARAWILLIAM K. CAVANAGH, JR.407 East Adams StreetSpringfield, IL 62701Telephone : 217/544-1771217/544-9894 (fax)

Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs

S:\Settlement\Direct General.set\(v1) EA-00040064.doc

-8-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 38 of

Page 39: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

EXHIBIT A-1

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 39 of

Page 40: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION

In re DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATIONSECURITIES LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Civil Action No. 3:05-0077

Judge Todd J. CampbellMagistrate Judge Juliet E . Griffin

CLASS ACTION

ALL ACTIONS.

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

EXHIBIT A-1

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 40 of

Page 41: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

TO: ALL PERSONS (OTHER THAN THOSE PERSONS WHO TIMELY ANDVALIDLY REQUEST EXCLUSION FROM THE CLASS) WHO PURCHASEDTHE COMMON STOCK OF DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION ("DIRECTGENERAL OR THE "COMPANY) BETWEEN AUGUST 11, 2003 ANDJANUARY 26, 2005, INCLUSIVE, INCLUDING THOSE WHO PURCHASEDSHARES OF DIRECT GENERAL COMMON STOCK ISSUED PURSUANT TOOR TRACEABLE TO DIRECT GENERAL'S AUGUST 11, 2003REGISTRATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS, AND DIRECT GENERAL'SMARCH 23, 2004 REGISTRATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLYAND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOURRIGHTS

MAY BE AFFECTED BY PROCEEDINGS IN THIS LITIGATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF

YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER (DEFINED BELOW), YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO SHARE

IN THE PROCEEDS OF THE SETTLEMENT DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE. TO CLAIM

YOUR SHARE OF THIS FUND, YOU MUST SUBMIT A VALID PROOF OF CLAIM AND

RELEASE FORM POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE , 2007 . IF YOU ARE A

MEMBER OF THE CLASS AND DONOT SUBMIT A TIMELY REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION,

YOU WILL BE BOUND BY THE RELEASE WHETHER OR NOT YOU SUBMIT A CLAIM.

1. SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT AND RELATED MATTERS

This Notice has been sent to you pursuant to Rule 23 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

and an Order of the United States District Court, Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division

(the "Court ). The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the pendency of this class action (the

"Litigation ) and the proposed settlement thereof and of the hearing to be held by the Court to

consider the fairness, reasonableness , and adequacy of the settlement. This Notice describes the

rights you may have in connection with participation in this settlement, what steps you may take in

relation to the settlement and this class action litigation, and alternatively, what steps you must take

if you wish to be excluded from the settlement and this class action.

The proposed settlement creates a fund in the amount of $14,940,000.00 in cash (the

"Settlement Fund ) and will include interest that accrues on the fund prior to distribution. Based on

Lead Plaintiffs' estimate of the number of shares entitled to participate in the settlement and the

-1-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 41 of

Page 42: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

anticipated number of claims to be submitted by Class Members, the average distribution per share

to Class Members who purchased Direct General common stock would be approximately $2.40

before deduction of Court-approved fees and expenses. Your actual recovery from this Settlement

Fund will depend on a number of variables including the number of claimants and the amounts of

shares they purchased, the number of Direct General shares you purchased, the expense of

administering the claims process , and the timing of your purchases and sales , if any (see Plan of

Allocation below).

Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants do not agree on the average amount ofdamages per share that

would be recoverable if Lead Plaintiffs were to have prevailed on each claim asserted. The issues on

which the parties disagree include: (1) whether the statements made or facts allegedly omitted were

false, material or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (2) the appropriate economic

model for determining the amount by which Direct General shares were allegedly artificially inflated

(if at all) during the Class Period; (3) the amount by which Direct General shares were allegedly

artificially inflated (if at all) during the Class Period; (4) the effect of various market forces

influencing the trading price of Direct General shares at various times during the Class Period; (5)

the extent to which external factors, such as general market conditions, influenced the trading price

ofDirect General shares at various times during the Class Period; (6) the extent to which the various

matters that Lead Plaintiffs alleged were materially false or misleading influenced (if at all) the

trading price ofDirect General shares at various times during the Class Period; and (7) the extent to

which the various allegedly adverse material facts that Lead Plaintiffs alleged were omitted

influenced (if at all) the trading price of Direct General shares at various times during the Class

Period.

Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs believe that the proposed settlement is a good recovery and is

in the best interests of the Class. Because of the risks associated with continuing to litigate and

-2-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 42 of

Page 43: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

proceeding to trial, there was a danger that Lead Plaintiffs would not have prevailed on any of their

claims , in which case the Class would receive nothing. For example, Lead Plaintiffs faced the

possibility that the claims in this case would have been dismissed in response to Defendants'

anticipated motions for summaryjudgment. In addition, the amount ofdamages recoverable by the

Class was and is challenged by Defendants. Recoverable damages in this case are limited to losses

caused by conduct actionable under applicable law and, had the Litigation gone to trial, Defendants

intended to assert that all or most of the losses of Class Members were caused by non-actionable

market, industry or general economic factors. Defendants would also assert that throughout the

Class Period the uncertainties and risks associated with Direct General's business and financial

condition were fully and adequately disclosed.

Lead Plaintiffs' counsel have not received any payment for their services in conducting the

Litigation on behalf of the Lead Plaintiffs and the Members of the Class, nor have they been

reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenditures . Ifthe settlement is approved by the Court, counsel

for the plaintiffs in this case will apply to the Court for attorneys' fees of 30% of the settlement

proceeds and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses not to exceed $600,000 to be paid from the

Settlement Fund. Ifthe amount requested by counsel is approved by the Court, the average cost per

share would be $0.82. The average cost per share could vary depending on the number of shares for

which claims are filed.

This Notice is not an expression of any opinion by the Court about the merits of any of the

claims or defenses asserted by any party in this Litigation or the fairness or adequacy ofthe proposed

settlement.

For further information regarding this settlement you may contact: Rick Nelson, Lerach

Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego,

-3-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 43 of

Page 44: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

California 92101, Telephone: 800/449-4900. Please do not call any representative ofDirect General,

the Underwriter Defendants, E&Y, or the Court.

II. NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

A settlement hearing will be held on , 2007, at _.m., before the Honorable

Todd J. Campbell, United States District Judge, United States District Court for the Middle District

of Tennessee, Nashville Division, Estes Kefauver Federal Building and United States Courthouse,

801 Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee 37203 (the "Settlement Hearing ). The purpose of the

Settlement Hearing will be to determine: (1) whether the settlement consisting of $14,940,000.00 in

cash plus accrued interest should be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate to each ofthe parties;

(2) whether the proposed plan to distribute the settlement proceeds (the "Plan ofAllocation ) is fair,

reasonable and adequate; (3) whether the application by Lead Plaintiffs' counsel for an award of

attorneys' fees and expenses should be approved; (4) whether the application for Lead Plaintiffs'

expenses (including lost wages) should be approved; and (5) whether the Litigation should be

dismissed with prejudice . The Court may adjourn or continue the Settlement Hearing without

further notice to the Class.

III. DEFINITIONS USED IN THIS NOTICE

1. "Class means a class consisting of all Persons (other than those Persons who timely

and validly request exclusion from the Class) who purchased the common stock of Direct General

between August 11, 2003 and January 26, 2005, inclusive, including those who purchased shares of

Direct General common stock issued pursuant to or traceable to Direct General's August 11, 2003

Registration Statement/Prospectus, and Direct General's March 23, 2004 Registration

Statement/Prospectus. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, members ofthe immediate families

of the Defendants, any entity in which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest, present or

former directors and officers of Direct General, any of the Underwriter Defendants , and E&Y, and

the legal representatives, heirs, successors , or assigns of any such Defendant.

-4-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 44 of

Page 45: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

2. "Class Member or "Member of the Class mean a Person who falls within the

definition of the Class as set forth above. Insofar as a Class Member makes a proper and timely

request for exclusion from the Class, he, she, or it shall not be considered a Class Member.

3.

2005.

4.

Defendants.

5.

"Class Period means the period commencing on August 11, 2003 to January 26,

"Defendants means the Direct General Defendants , E&Y and the Underwriter

"Direct General Defendants means Direct General , William C. Adair, Jr., Tammy R.

Adair, Jacqueline C. Adair, Barry D. Elkins, Brian G. Moore, Fred H. Medling, Raymond L.

Osterhout and Stephen L. Rohde.

6. "Lead Counsel means Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP.

7. "Lead Plaintiffs means the Structural Ironworkers Local Union #1 Annuity, Pension

and Welfare Funds and John Dzaugis.

8. "Person means an individual, corporation, limited liability corporation, professional

corporation, limited liability partnership, partnership, limited partnership, association , joint stock

company, estate, legal representative, trust, unincorporated association, government or any political

subdivision or agency thereof, and any business or legal entity and their spouses, heirs, predecessors,

successors, representatives, or assignees.

9. "Related Persons means each of a Defendant's (including its predecessors,

successors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, joint ventures, and related or affiliated entities) past or

present directors, officers, managers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents, underwriters,

insurers and co-insurers and their reinsurers, controlling shareholders, venture capital investors,

attorneys, accountants or auditors, banks or investment banks, financial advisors, associates,

personal or legal representatives, assigns, spouses, heirs, any entity in which a Defendant has a

-5-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 45 of

Page 46: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

controlling interest, any members oftheir immediate families, or any trust ofwhich any Defendant is

the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his or her family.

10. "Released Claims shall collectively mean all claims (including "Unknown Claims

as defined below), demands, rights, liabilities and causes of action of every nature and description

under federal or state law, whether based upon statutory or common law, whether class or individual

in nature, known or unknown, concealed or hidden, that either were asserted or could have been

asserted, by the Lead Plaintiffs or any Class Member against the Released Parties arising out of or

relating to the purchase ofDirect General common stock during the Class Period, and the acts, facts,

statements , or omissions that were or could have been alleged in the Litigation.

11. "Released Parties means each and all of the Defendants and their Related Persons.

12. "Settlement Fund means the principal amount of Fourteen Million Nine Hundred

Forty Thousand Dollars ($14,940,000) in cash, plus any accrued interest.

13. "Settling Parties means, collectively, each ofthe Defendants and the Lead Plaintiffs

on behalf of themselves and Members of the Class.

14. "Underwriter Defendants means Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., Morgan Keegan &

Co. Inc., U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey.

15. "Unknown Claims means any Released Claims that the Lead Plaintiffs or Class

Members do not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of the

Released Parties, and any Settled Defendants' Claims that any Defendant does not know or suspect

to exist in his, her, or its favor, which, ifknown by him, her, or it, might have affected his, her, or its

settlement with and release ofthe Released Parties, or might have affected his, her, or its decision(s)

with respect to the settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims and Settled Defendants'

Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, Lead Plaintiffs and the

Defendants shall expressly waive, and each of the Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by

-6-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 46 of

Page 47: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

operation ofthe Judgment shall have, expressly waived the provisions, rights, and benefits conferred

by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, which is

similar , comparable or equivalent to California Civil Code § 1542, which provides:

A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not knowor suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which ifknown by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with thedebtor.

The Lead Plaintiffs and Class Members may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from

those that any ofthem now knows or believes to be true related to the subject matter ofthe Released

Claims, but the Lead Plaintiffs shall expressly and each Class Member, upon the Effective Date,

shall be deemed to have , and by operation ofJudgment shall have , fully, finally, and forever settled

and released any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent

or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed

upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but

not limited to, conduct that is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach ofany duty,

law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional

facts. Similarly, the Defendants and Released Parties may hereafter discover facts in addition to or

different from those that any ofthem now know or believe to be true related to the subject matter of

the Settled Defendants' Claims, but each Defendant shall expressly and each Released Party, upon

the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have fully,

finally, and forever settled and released any and all Settled Defendants' Claims, known or unknown,

suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent , whether or not concealed or hidden, which

now exist , or heretofore have existed upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into

existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct that is negligent, intentional, with or

without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or

existence of such different or additional facts. The Settling Parties acknowledge, and the Class

-7-Case 3 : 05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 47 of

Page 48: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

Members and the Released Parties shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have

acknowledged, that the inclusion of "Unknown Claims in the definition of Released Claims and

Settled Defendants' Claims was separately bargained for and is a key element of the settlement of

which these releases are a part.

IV. THE LITIGATION

Shortly after January 26, 2005, several securities class action lawsuits were filed in the

United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division on behalf of

persons who purchased securities of Direct General Corporation.

In March 2005, the Court consolidated the actions for all purposes under the caption In re

Direct General Corporation Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 3:05-0077. Thereafter, in April

2005, the Court appointed the Structural Ironworkers Local Union #1 Annuity, Pension and Welfare

Funds and John Dzaugis as Lead Plaintiffs under §21D(a)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934 ("Exchange Act ) and approved Lead Plaintiffs' selection of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller

Rudman & Robbins LLP as Lead Counsel and Barrett, Johnston & Parsley as liaison counsel.

On June 17, 2005, Lead Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of

the Federal Securities Laws (the "Complaint ), asserting claims under the Securities Act of 1933

("Securities Act ) and the Exchange Act on behalf of all persons who purchased Direct General

securities between August 11, 2003 and January 26, 2005. The Complaint names Direct General,

William C. Adair, Jr., Tammy R. Adair, Jacqueline C. Adair, Barry D. Elkins, Brian G. Moore, Fred

H. Medling, Raymond L. Osterhout, Stephen Rohde, certain investment banking firms that

underwrote Direct General ' s stock offerings and the Company' s auditor Ernst & Young LLP

("E&Y ) as defendants. The Complaint alleges that Defendants made materially false and

misleading statements and omissions regarding the impact on the Company 's claims exposure and

-8-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 48 of

Page 49: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

the level of the Company' s related loss reserves as a result of recent Florida legislation , the Florida

Motor Vehicle Insurance Affordability Reform Act of 2003.

Following the filing ofthe Complaint, all Defendants individually and collectively moved to

dismiss the Complaint, arguing among other things that Lead Plaintiffs had not satisfied the

heightened pleading standards of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA ),

and that Lead Plaintiffs lacked standing . On November 9, 2005, the Court issued an opinion denying

most of Defendants' motions to dismiss , but the Court dismissed with prejudice all claims against

the William C. Adair, Jr. Trust and it dismissed claims against E&Y asserted under the Exchange

Act, and dismissed certain claims under the Securities Act.

Following denial of Defendants' motions to dismiss, Lead Plaintiffs commenced formal

discovery. In February 2006, Lead Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Class Certification. Over the

following three months, the parties engaged in document and deposition discovery related to class

certification, including the depositions of Lead Plaintiffs and their market efficiency expert.

Thereafter, all Defendants filed briefs in opposition to Lead Plaintiffs' Motion for Class

Certification. On August 8, 2006, the Court certified a class consisting of all purchasers of the

securities of Direct General between August 11, 2003 and January 26, 2005 , inclusive, including

those who purchased shares of Direct General common stock issued pursuant to or traceable to

Direct General's August 11, 2003 Registration Statement/Prospectus and Direct General's March 23,

2004 Registration Statement/Prospectus.

On January 23, 2007, the parties participated in mediation with the Honorable Daniel L.

Weinstein (Ret.). At the mediation, the Settling Parties reached an agreement-in-principle to settle

the Litigation.

-9-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 49 of

Page 50: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

V. CLAIMS OF THE LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND BENEFITS OFSETTLEMENT

The Lead Plaintiffs believe that the claims asserted in the Litigation have merit. However,

counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued

proceedings necessary to prosecute the Litigation against the Defendants through trial and through

appeals. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and the

risk of any litigation, especially in complex actions such as the Litigation, as well as the difficulties

and delays inherent in such litigation. Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs also are mindful of the

inherent problems of proof under and possible defenses to the violations alleged in the Litigation.

Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs believe that the settlement set forth in the Stipulation confers

substantial benefits upon the Class and is in the best interest of the Class.

VI. DEFENDANTS' DENIALS OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY

The Defendants have denied and continue to deny each and all ofthe claims and contentions

alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs in the Litigation. The Defendants expressly have denied and continue

to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out of any of the conduct,

statements, acts or omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Litigation. The

Defendants also have denied and continue to deny, inter alia , the allegations that the Lead Plaintiffs

or Class Members have suffered damage, that the price of Direct General common stock was

artificially inflated by reasons of alleged misrepresentations , non-disclosures or otherwise, that the

Lead Plaintiffs or Class Members can prove that any alleged statements caused their losses , or that

the Lead Plaintiffs or the Class were otherwise harmed by the conduct alleged in the Litigation.

Nonetheless, the Defendants have concluded that further conduct of the Litigation could be

protracted and expensive , and that it is desirable that the Litigation be fully and finally settled in the

manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation. The Defendants also have

taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in complex cases

- 10-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 50 of

Page 51: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

like the Litigation. The Defendants have, therefore, determined that it is desirable and beneficial to

them that the Litigation be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the

Stipulation.

VII. TERMS OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

The Defendants will pay or cause to be paid into an escrow account, pursuant to the terms of

the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of March 30, 2007 (the "Stipulation ), cash in the amount of

$14,940,000.00 which will earn interest for the benefit of the Class.

A portion of the settlement proceeds will be used for certain administrative expenses,

including costs ofprinting and mailing this Notice, the cost ofpublishing newspaper notice, payment

ofany taxes assessed against the Settlement Fund and costs associated with the processing ofclaims

submitted. In addition, as explained below, a portion ofthe Settlement Fund may be awarded by the

Court to counsel for Lead Plaintiffs for attorneys' fees and for reimbursement of out-of-pocket

expenses and to Lead Plaintiffs for their expenses (including lost wages) incurred in representing the

Class. The balance ofthe Settlement Fund (the "Net Settlement Fund ) will be distributed according

to the Plan of Allocation described below to Class Members who submit valid and timely Proof of

Claim forms.

VIII. PLAN OF ALLOCATION

The Net Settlement Fund will be distributed to Class Members who submit valid, timely

ProofofClaim forms ("Authorized Claimants ) under the Plan ofAllocation described below. The

Plan of Allocation provides that you will be eligible to participate in the distribution of the Net

Settlement Fund only if you have a net loss on all transactions in Direct General common stock.

Each Authorized Claimant shall be paid the percentage ofthe Net Settlement Fund that each

Authorized Claimant's claim bears to the total of the claims of all Authorized Claimants. Payment

in this manner shall be deemed conclusive against all Authorized Claimants.

-11-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 51 of

Page 52: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

The total ofall profits shall be subtracted from the total of all losses from transactions during

the Class Period to determine if a Class Member has a claim. Only if a Class Member had a net loss,

after all profits from transactions in Direct General common stock during the Class Period are

subtracted from all losses, will such Class Member be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net

Settlement Fund. Claims will be calculated as follows:

Common Stock Purchases August 11, 2003 through January 26, 2005

1. For shares ofDirect General common stock purchased from August 11, 2003 through

January 26, 2005, and

(a) sold prior to January 27, 2005 , the claim per share is $0.00.

(b) retained at the end ofJanuary 26, 2005 , the claim per share is $8.88 (January

27, 2005 price decline).

Section 11 Claims Related to the Company's August 2003 Stock Offering

2. For shares ofDirect General common stock purchased for $21.00 a share, pursuant to

the Company's offering prospectus dated August 11, 2003, and

(a) sold prior to January 31, 2005, the claim per share shall be $21.00 less the

sales price per share.

(b) sold between February 1, 2005 through March 26, 2007, the claim per share

shall be the lesser of (i) $21.00 less the sales price per share , or (ii) $2.25.

(c) retained at the end of March 27, 2007, the claim per share shall be $2.25.

Section 11 Claims Related to the Company's March 2004 Secondary Offering

For shares ofDirect General common stock purchased for $34.25 a share, pursuant to

the Company's offering prospectus dated August 11, 2003, and

(a) sold prior to January 31, 2005, the claim per share shall be $34.25 less the

sales price per share.

-12-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 52 of

Page 53: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

(b) sold between February 1, 2005 through March 26, 2007, the claim per share

shall be the lesser of (i) $34.25 less the sales price per share, or (ii) $15.50.

(c) retained at the end ofDecember 8, 2006, the claim per share shall be $15.50.

The date of purchase or sale is the "contract or "trade date as distinguished from the

"settlement date. The determination of the price paid per share and the price received per share

shall be exclusive of all commissions, taxes, fees and charges.

For Class Members who made multiple purchases or multiple sales during the Class Period,

the earliest subsequent sale shall be matched with the earliest purchase and chronologically

thereafter for purposes of the claim calculations.

The Court has reserved jurisdiction to allow, disallow or adjust the claim of any Class

Member on equitable grounds.

IX. ORDER CERTIFYING A CLASS FOR PURPOSES OF SETTLEMENT

On , 2007, the Court certified a class . The Class is defined above.

X. PARTICIPATION IN THE CLASS

If you fall within the definition of the Class, you will remain a Class Member unless you

elect to be excluded from the Class. Ifyou do not request to be excluded from the Class, you will be

bound by any judgment entered with respect to the settlement in the Litigation whether or not you

submit a Proof of Claim and Release form.

Ifyou wish to remain a Class Member, you need do nothing (other than timely submit a

Proof of Claim and Release form if you wish to participate in the distribution of the Net

Settlement Fund). Your interests will be represented by Lead Counsel. If you choose, you may

enter an appearance individually or through your own counsel at your own expense.

TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND,

YOU MUST TIMELY COMPLETE AND RETURN THE PROOF OF CLAIM AND

RELEASE FORM THAT ACCOMPANIES THIS NOTICE. The Proof of Claim and Release

-13 -

Case 3 : 05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 53 of

Page 54: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

form must be postmarked on or before , 2007, and delivered to the Claims

Administrator at the address below. Unless the Court orders otherwise, ifyou do not timely submit a

valid ProofofClaim form, you will be barred from receiving any payments from the Net Settlement

Fund, but will in all other respects be bound by the provisions of the Stipulation and the Judgment.

XI. EXCLUSION FROM THE CLASS

You may request to be excluded from the Class. To do so, you must mail a written request

stating that you wish to be excluded from the Class to:

Direct General Securities LitigationClaims Administratorc/o Gilardi & Co. LLCP.O. Box 8040San Rafael , CA 94912-8040

The request for exclusion must state: (a) your name, address, and telephone number; and

(b) all purchases and sales ofDirect General common stock, including the dates ofpurchase or sale,

the number of such shares purchased or sold and the price paid or received per share. YOUR

EXCLUSION REQUEST MUST BE POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE , 2007. If

you submit a valid and timely request for exclusion, you shall have no rights under the settlement,

shall not share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the

Stipulation or the Judgment. Defendants may withdraw from and terminate the settlement if Class

Members who purchased in excess of a certain amount of shares of Direct General common stock

exclude themselves from the Class.

XII. DISMISSAL AND RELEASES

If the proposed settlement is approved, the Court will enter a Final Judgment and Order of

Dismissal with Prejudice ("Judgment ). The Judgment will dismiss the Released Claims with

prejudice as to all Released Parties.

- 14-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 54 of

Page 55: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

The Judgment will provide that all Class Members who do not validly and timely request to

be excluded from the Class shall be deemed to have released and forever discharged all Released

Claims (to the extent Members of the Class have such claims) against all Released Parties.

XIII. MOTION FOR FEES AND EXPENSES

At the Settlement Hearing, counsel for Lead Plaintiffs will request the Court to award

attorneys' fees of 30% of the Settlement Fund, plus reimbursement of the expenses, not to exceed

$600,000, which were advanced in connection with the Litigation, plus interest thereon. In addition,

Lead Plaintiffs may seek compensation for their expenses (including lost wages) in prosecuting the

Litigation on behalf of the Class. Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or

expenses.

To date, Lead Counsel have not received any payment for their services in conducting this

Litigation on behalf of Lead Plaintiffs and the Members of the Class, nor have counsel been

reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses. The fee requested by Lead Counsel would compensate

counsel for their efforts in achieving the Settlement Fund for the benefit of the Class, and for their

risk in undertaking this representation on a contingency basis. The fee requested is within the range

of fees awarded to plaintiffs' counsel under similar circumstances in litigation of this type.

XIV. CONDITIONS FOR SETTLEMENT

The settlement is conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events described in the

Stipulation. Those events include, among other things: (a) entry of the Judgment by the Court, as

provided for in the Stipulation; and (b) expiration of the time to appeal from or alter or amend the

Judgment. If, for any reason, any one of the conditions described in the Stipulation is not met, the

Stipulation might be terminated and, ifterminated, will become null and void, and the parties to the

Stipulation will be restored to their respective positions as of March 1, 2007.

- 15-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 55 of

Page 56: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

XV. THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD AT THE HEARING

Any Class Member who has not validly and timely requested to be excluded from the Class,

and who objects to any aspect of the settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or the application for

attorneys' fees, costs and expenses, may appear and be heard at the Settlement Hearing. Any such

Person must submit a written notice of objection, filed with the Clerk of the Court at the address

listed below on or before . 2007:

CLERK OF THE COURTUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEENASHVILLE DIVISIONEstes Kefauver Federal Building andUnited States Courthouse

801 Broadway, Room 800Nashville , TN 37203

The written notice of objection must also be served by hand or sent by first class mail on or before

, 2007 on each of the following:

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLERRUDMAN & ROBBINS LLPJEFFREY D. LIGHT655 West Broadway, Suite 1900San Diego , CA 92101

Attorneys for Defendants

ALSTON & BIRD, LLPSCOTT P. HILSENOne Atlantic Center1201 West Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309-3424

The notice of objection must demonstrate the objecting Person's membership in the Class, by and

including (a) the objecting Person's name, address, and telephone number; (b) formal proof of the

number of shares ofDirect General common stock purchased and sold during the Class Period by the

objecting Person and contain a statement of the reasons for objection. Only Members of the Class

-16-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 56 of

Page 57: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

who have submitted written notices of objection in this manner will be entitled to be heard at the

Settlement Hearing, unless the Court orders otherwise.

XVI. SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES

Ifyou hold any Direct General common stock purchased during the Class Period as nominee

for a beneficial owner, then, within ten (10) days after you receive this Notice, you must either:

(a) send a copy of this Notice and the Proof of Claim by first class mail to all such Persons; or

(b) provide a list of the names and addresses of such Persons to the Claims Administrator:

Direct General Securities LitigationClaims Administratorc/o Gilardi & Co. LLCP.O. Box 8040San Rafael , CA 94912-8040

If you choose to mail the Notice and Proof of Claim yourself, you may obtain from the

Claims Administrator (without cost to you) as many additional copies of these documents as you

will need to complete the mailing.

Regardless of whether you choose to complete the mailing yourself or elect to have the

mailing performed for you, you may obtain reimbursement for or advancement of reasonable

administrative costs actually incurred or expected to be incurred in connection with forwarding the

Notice and ProofofClaim and which would not have been incurred but for the obligation to forward

the Notice and Proof of Claim, upon submission of appropriate documentation to the Claims

Administrator.

XVII. EXAMINATION OF PAPERS

This Notice is a summary and does not describe all of the details of the Stipulation. For full

details of the matters discussed in this Notice, you may review the Stipulation filed with the Court,

which may be inspected during business hours , at the office of the Clerk ofthe Court, United States

District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, Estes Kefauver Federal

Building and United States Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Room 800, Nashville, Tennessee 37203.

- 17-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 57 of

Page 58: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

If you have any questions about the settlement of the Litigation, you may contact Lead

Counsel at:

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLERRUDMAN & ROBBINS LLPRICK NELSONSHAREHOLDER RELATIONS655 West Broadway, Suite 1900San Diego, CA 921011-800-449-4900

DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE.

DATED: 12007

S:\Settlement\Direct General .set\(v1) A1-00040071.doc

BY ORDER OF THE COURTUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEENASHVILLE DIVISION

-18-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 58 of

Page 59: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

EXHIBIT A-2

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 59 of

Page 60: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION

In re DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATIONSECURITIES LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Civil Action No. 3:05-0077

Judge Todd J. CampbellMagistrate Judge Juliet E . Griffin

CLASS ACTION

ALL ACTIONS.

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

EXHIBIT A-2

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 60 of

Page 61: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. To recover as a Member ofthe Class based on your claims in the action entitled In re

Direct General Corporation Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 3:05-0077 (the "Litigation ), you

must complete and, on page hereof, sign this Proof of Claim and Release . If you fail to file a

properly addressed (as set forth in paragraph 3 below) Proof of Claim and Release, your claim may

be rejected and you may be precluded from any recovery from the Settlement Fund created in

connection with the proposed settlement of the Litigation.

2. Submission of this Proof of Claim and Release , however, does not assure that you

will share in the proceeds of settlement in the Litigation.

3. YOU MUST MAIL YOUR COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROOF OF CLAIM

AND RELEASE POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE , 2007, ADDRESSED AS

FOLLOWS:

Direct General Securities LitigationClaims Administratorc/o Gilardi & Co. LLCP.O. Box 8040San Rafael , CA 94912-8040

If you are NOT a Member of the Class (as defined in the Notice of Pendency and Proposed

Settlement of Class Action) DO NOT submit a Proof of Claim and Release form.

4. If you are a Member of the Class and you do not timely request exclusion, you are

bound by the terms ofany judgment entered in the Litigation, WHETHER ORNOT YOU SUBMIT

A PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM.

II. DEFINITIONS

1. "Defendants means the Direct General Defendants , Ernst & Young LLP ("E&Y )

and the Underwriter Defendants.

-1-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 61 of

Page 62: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

2. "Direct General Defendants means Direct General , William C. Adair Jr., Tammy R.

Adair, Jacqueline C. Adair, Barry D. Elkins, Brian G. Moore, Fred H. Medling, Raymond L.

Osterhout and Stephen L. Rohde.

3. "Related Persons means each of a Defendant's (including its predecessors,

successors, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, joint ventures, and related or affiliated entities) past or

present directors, officers, managers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents, underwriters,

insurers and co-insurers and their reinsurers, controlling shareholders, venture capital investors,

attorneys, accountants or auditors, banks or investment banks, financial advisors, associates,

personal or legal representatives, assigns, spouses, heirs, any entity in which a Defendant has a

controlling interest, any members oftheir immediate families, or any trust ofwhich any Defendant is

the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his or her family.

4. "Released Parties means each and all of the Defendants and their Related Persons.

5. "Underwriter Defendants means Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc., Morgan Keegan &

Co. Inc., U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. and Sun Trust Robinson Humphrey.

III. CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION

1. If you purchased Direct General common stock and held the certificate(s) in your

name, you are the beneficial purchaser as well as the record purchaser. If, however, you purchased

Direct General common stock and the certificate(s) were registered in the name ofa third party, such

as a nominee or brokerage firm, you are the beneficial purchaser and the third party is the record

purchaser.

2. Use Part I ofthis form entitled "Claimant Identification to identify each purchaser of

record ("nominee ), if different from the beneficial purchaser of Direct General common stock

which forms the basis of this claim . THIS CLAIM MUST BE FILED BY THE ACTUAL

BENEFICIAL PURCHASER OR PURCHASERS, OR THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF

-2-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 62 of

Page 63: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

SUCH PURCHASER OR PURCHASERS, OF THE DIRECT GENERAL COMMON STOCK

UPON WHICH THIS CLAIM IS BASED.

3. All joint purchasers must sign this claim. Executors , administrators , guardians,

conservators and trustees must complete and sign this claim on behalf of Persons represented by

them and their authority must accompany this claim and their titles or capacities must be stated. The

Social Security (or taxpayer identification) number and telephone number of the beneficial owner

may be used in verifying the claim. Failure to provide the foregoing information could delay

verification of your claim or result in rejection of the claim.

IV. CLAIM FORM

Use Part II ofthis form entitled "Schedule ofTransactions in Direct General Common

Stock to supply all required details ofyour transaction(s) in Direct General common stock. Ifyou

need more space or additional schedules, attach separate sheets giving all ofthe required information

in substantially the same form. Sign and print or type your name on each additional sheet.

2. On the schedules, provide all ofthe requested information with respect to all ofyour

purchases and all of your sales of Direct General common stock which took place at any time

beginning August 11, 2003 through and including January 26, 2005 (the "Class Period ), whether

such transactions resulted in a profit or a loss. Failure to report all such transactions may result in

the rejection of your claim.

3. List each transaction in the Class Period separately and in chronological order, by

trade date, beginning with the earliest. You must accurately provide the month, day and year ofeach

transaction you list.

4. The date of covering a "short sale is deemed to be the date of purchase of Direct

General common stock. The date of a "short sale is deemed to be the date of sale ofDirect General

common stock.

-3-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 63 of

Page 64: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

Broker confirmations or other documentation ofyour transactions in Direct General

common stock should be attached to your claim. Failure to provide this documentation could delay

verification of your claim or result in rejection of your claim.

-4-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 64 of

Page 65: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION

In re Direct General Corporation Securities Litigation,Civil Action No. 3:05-0077

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

Must be Postmarked No Later Than:12007

Please Type or Print

PART I: CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION

Beneficial Owner's Name (First, Middle, Last)

Street Address

City

Zip Code or Postal Code

Social Security Number orTaxpayer Identification Number

State or Province

Country

Individual

Corporation/Other

Area Code Telephone Number (work)

Area Code Telephone Number (home)

Record Owner's Name (if different from beneficial owner listed above)

-5-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 65 of

Page 66: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

PART II: SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN DIRECT GENERAL COMMON STOCK

A. Number of shares ofDirect General common stock held at the beginning of tradingon August 11, 2003:

B. Purchases (August 11, 2003 through January 26, 2005, inclusive) of Direct Generalcommon stock:

Trade DateMonth Day Year Number of Shares Purchased Total Purchase Price

1.

2.

3.

IMPORTANT: Identify by number listed above all purchases in which you covered a "shortsale :

C. Sales (August 11, 2003 through January 26, 2005, inclusive) of Direct Generalcommon stock:

Trade DateMonth Day Year

1.

2.

3.

Number of Shares Sold Total Sales Price

D. Number of shares of Direct General common stock held at close of trading onJanuary 26, 2005:

YOU MUST READ THE RELEASE AND SIGN ON PAGE

If you require additional space , attach extra schedules in the same format as above. Sign and printyour name on each additional page.

-6-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 66 of

Page 67: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

V. SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION OF COURT ANDACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I (We) submit this Proof of Claim and Release under the terms of the Stipulation of

Settlement described in the Notice. I (We) also submit to the jurisdiction of the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, with respect to my (our)

claim as a Class Member and for purposes of enforcing the release set forth herein. I (We) further

acknowledge that I am (we are) bound by and subject to the terms of any judgment that may be

entered in the Litigation. I (We) agree to furnish additional information to the Claims Administrator

to support this claim if required to do so. I (We) have not submitted any other claim in this

Litigation covering the same purchases or sales of Direct General common stock during the Class

Period and know of no other Person having done so on my (our) behalf.

VI. RELEASE

1. I (We) hereby acknowledge full and complete satisfaction of, and do hereby fully,

finally and forever release, relinquish and discharge from the Released Claims each and all of the

Released Parties (as defined above).

2. "Released Claims shall collectively mean all claims (including "Unknown Claims

as defined below), demands, rights, liabilities and causes of action of every nature and description

under federal or state law, whether based upon statutory or common law, whether class or individual

in nature, known or unknown, concealed or hidden, that either were asserted or could have been

asserted, by the Lead Plaintiffs or any Class Member against the Released Parties arising out of or

relating to the purchase ofDirect General common stock during the Class Period, and the acts, facts,

statements , or omissions that were or could have been alleged in the Litigation.

3. "Unknown Claims means any Released Claims that the Lead Plaintiffs or Class

Members do not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of the

Released Parties, which, if known by him, her, or it, might have affected his, her, or its settlement

-7-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 67 of

Page 68: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

with and release of the Released Parties, or might have affected his, her, or its decision(s) with

respect to the settlement . With respect to any and all Released Claims the Settling Parties stipulate

and agree that, upon the Effective Date, Lead Plaintiffs and the Defendants shall expressly waive,

and each of the Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall

have, expressly waived the provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or

territory of the United States, or principle of common law, which is similar , comparable or

equivalent to California Civil Code § 1542, which provides:

A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not knowor suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which ifknown by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with thedebtor.

The Lead Plaintiffs and Class Members may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from

those that any ofthem now knows or believes to be true related to the subject matter ofthe Released

Claims, but the Lead Plaintiffs shall expressly and each Class Member, upon the Effective Date,

shall be deemed to have , and by operation ofJudgment shall have , fully, finally, and forever settled

and released any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent

or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed

upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but

not limited to, conduct that is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach ofany duty,

law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional

facts. The Settling Parties acknowledge, and the Class Members and the Released Parties shall be

deemed by operation of the Judgment to have acknowledged, that the inclusion of "Unknown

Claims in the definition of Released Claims was separately bargained for and is a key element of

the settlement of which these releases are a part.

-8-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 68 of

Page 69: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

4. These releases shall be of no force or effect unless and until the Court approves the

Stipulation of Settlement and the Stipulation becomes effective on the Effective Date (as defined in

the Stipulation).

I (We) agree to be bound by all prior court rulings in the Litigation, and agree to be

bound by all actions taken by the Lead Plaintiffs and their counsel, including the voluntary dismissal

of any claims alleged in any of the complaints filed in the Litigation.

6. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have not assigned or transferred or

purported to assign or transfer, voluntarily or involuntarily, any matter released pursuant to these

releases or any other part or portion thereof.

7. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have included information about all

ofmy (our) transactions in Direct General common stock which occurred during the Class Period,

the number of shares held by me (us) at the opening of trading on August 11, 2003 and the close of

trading on January 26, 2005.

-9-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 69 of

Page 70: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9

Request for Taxpayer Identification Number ("TIN ) and Certification

PART I

NAME:

Check appropriate box:

q Individual/Sole Proprietor q Pension Planq Corporation q Partnership q Trustq IRA q Other

Enter TIN on appropriate line.

For individuals, this is your Social Security Number ("SSN ).

For sole proprietors, you must show your individual name, but you may also enter yourbusiness or "doing business as name. You may enter either your SSN or your EmployerIdentification Number ("EIN ).

For other entities, it is your EIN.

- - or --- -- ---- -- -----Nu-

Social Security Number Employer Identification mber

PART II

For Payees Exempt from Backup Withholding

Ifyou are exempt from backup withholding, enter your correct TIN in Part I and write "exempt onthe following line:

PART III

Certification

UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY, I (WE) CERTIFY THAT:

The number shown on this form is my correct TIN; and

2. I (We) certify that I am (we are) NOT subject to backup withholding under the provisions ofSection 3406 (a)(1)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code because: (a) I am (we are) exemptfrom backup withholding; or (b) I (we) have not been notified by the Internal RevenueService that I am (we are) subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report allinterest or dividends; or (c) the Internal Revenue Service has notified me (us) that I am (weare) no longer subject to backup withholding.

-10-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 70 of

Page 71: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

NOTE: If you have been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you are subject tobackup withholding, you must cross out Item 2 above.

SEE ENCLOSED FORM W-9 INSTRUCTIONS

The Internal Revenue Service does not require your consent to any provision ofthis document other

than the certification required to avoid backup withholding.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

foregoing information supplied by the undersigned is true and correct.

Executed this

in

(City) (State/Country)

(Sign your name here)

(Type or print your name here)

(Capacity of person(s) signing,e.g., Beneficial Purchaser,Executor or Administrator)

ACCURATE CLAIMS PROCESSING TAKES ASIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME.THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE.

Reminder Checklist:

1. Please sign the above release and declaration.

2. Remember to attach supporting documentation, if available.

3. Do not send original stock certificates.

4. Keep a copy of your claim form for your records.

5. If you desire an acknowledgment of receipt of your claim form, please send itCertified Mail, Return Receipt Requested.

6. If you move, please send us your new address.

S:\Settlement\Direct General.set\(v1) A2-00040083.doc

day of ,(Month/Year)

-11-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 71 of

Page 72: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

EXHIBIT A-3

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 72 of

Page 73: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION

In re DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATIONSECURITIES LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Civil Action No. 3:05-0077

Judge Todd J. CampbellMagistrate Judge Juliet E . Griffin

CLASS ACTION

ALL ACTIONS.

SUMMARY NOTICE

EXHIBIT A-3

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 73 of

Page 74: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

TO: ALL PERSONS (OTHER THAN THOSE PERSONS WHO TIMELY ANDVALIDLY REQUEST EXCLUSION FROM THE CLASS) WHO PURCHASEDTHE COMMON STOCK OF DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION ("DIRECTGENERAL) BETWEEN AUGUST 11, 2003 AND JANUARY 26, 2005,INCLUSIVE, INCLUDING THOSE WHO PURCHASED SHARES OF DIRECTGENERAL COMMON STOCK ISSUED PURSUANT TO OR TRACEABLE TODIRECT GENERAL'S AUGUST 11, 2003 REGISTRATIONSTATEMENT/PROSPECTUS, AND DIRECT GENERAL'S MARCH 23, 2004REGISTRATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, that a hearing will be held on

, 2007, at _.m., before the Honorable Todd J. Campbell, United States District

Judge, at the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division,

Estes Kefauver Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville,

Tennessee, for the purpose of determining: (1) whether the proposed settlement of the claims in the

Litigation for the sum of $14,940,000.00 in cash plus accrued interest should be approved by the

Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (2) whether this Litigation should be dismissed with

prejudice; (3) whether the Plan of Allocation is fair, reasonable, and adequate and therefore should

be approved; and (4) whether the application ofLead Counsel for the payment ofattorneys' fees and

reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with this Litigation and reimbursement of the

Lead Plaintiffs' expenses should be approved.

Ifyou purchased Direct General common stock during the period beginning August 11, 2003

through and including January 26, 2005, your rights may be affected by the settlement of this

Litigation. Ifyou have not received a detailed Notice ofPendency and Proposed Settlement ofClass

Action ("Notice ) and a copy of the Proof of Claim and Release form, you may obtain copies by

writing to Direct General Securities Litigation , Claims Administrator, c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC, P.O.

Box 8040, San Rafael, CA 94912-8040, or you can download a copy at www.gilardi.com. If you

are a Class Member, in order to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must

-1-Case 3 : 05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 74 of

Page 75: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

submit a Proof of Claim and Release form postmarked no later than , 2007,

establishing that you are entitled to recovery. You will be bound by any judgment rendered in the

Litigation whether or not you make a claim.

If you desire to be excluded from the Class, you must submit a request for exclusion

postmarked by , 2007, in the manner and form explained in the detailed Notice

referred to above. All Members of the Class who have not requested exclusion from the Class will

be bound by any judgment entered in the Litigation pursuant to the Stipulation of Settlement.

Any objection to the settlement must be filed with the Court at the address below and served

by hand or first class mail on the attorneys listed below on or before , 2007:

CLERK OF THE COURTUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEENASHVILLE DIVISIONEstes Kefauver Federal Building andUnited States Courthouse

801 Broadway, Room 800Nashville , TN 37203

Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLERRUDMAN & ROBBINS LLPJEFFREY D. LIGHT655 West Broadway, Suite 1900San Diego , CA 92101

Counsel for Defendants

ALSTON & BIRD, LLPSCOTT P. HILSENOne Atlantic Center1201 West Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309-3424

-2-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 75 of

Page 76: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK'S OFFICE

REGARDING THIS NOTICE.

DATED: 12007 BY ORDER OF THE COURTUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEENASHVILLE DIVISION

S:\Settlement\Direct General.set\(v1) A3-00040086.doc

-3-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 76 of

Page 77: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

EXHIBIT B

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 77 of

Page 78: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION

In re DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATIONSECURITIES LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Civil Action No. 3:05-0077

Judge Todd J. CampbellMagistrate Judge Juliet E . Griffin

CLASS ACTION

ALL ACTIONS.

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

EXHIBIT B

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 78 of

Page 79: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to the Order of this Court, dated

2007, on the application of the parties for approval ofthe settlement set forth

in the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of March 30, 2007 (the "Stipulation ). The Court having

considered all matters submitted to it at the hearing and having considered all papers filed and

proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause

appearing therefore , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation, and all

terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation.

2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation and over all

parties to the Litigation, including all Members of the Class.

3. Pursuant to Rule 23 ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure, this Court hereby finally

certifies this action as a class action on behalf of all Persons (other than those Persons who timely

and validly requested exclusion from the Class) who purchased the common stock ofDirect General

between August 11, 2003 and January 26, 2005, inclusive, including those who purchased shares of

Direct General common stock issued pursuant to or traceable to Direct General's August 11, 2003

Registration Statement/Prospectus, and Direct General's March 23, 2004 Registration

Statement/Prospectus. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, members ofthe immediate families

of the Defendants, any entity in which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest, present or

former directors and officers of Direct General, any of the Underwriter Defendants , and E&Y, and

the legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns of any such Defendant.

4. With respect to the Class, this Court finds and concludes that: (a) the Members ofthe

Class are so numerous that joinder ofall Class Members in the class action is impracticable; (b) there

are questions oflaw and fact common to the Class which predominate over any individual question;

(c) the claims of the Lead Plaintiffs are typical ofthe claims of the Class; (d) the Lead Plaintiffs and

-1-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 79 of

Page 80: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

their counsel have fairly and adequately represented and protected the interests of the Class

Members; and (e) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient

adjudication of the controversy, considering : (i) the interests of the Members of the Class in

individually controlling the prosecution of the separate actions, (ii) the extent and nature of any

litigation concerning the controversy already commenced by Members of the Class, (iii) the

desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of these claims in this particular forum,

and (iv) the difficulties likely to be encountered in the management of the class action.

5. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, this Court hereby approves the

settlement set forth in the Stipulation and fords that said settlement is, in all respects, fair,

reasonable, and adequate to the Class.

6. Except as to any individual claim of those Persons (identified in Exhibit 1 attached

hereto) who have validly and timely requested exclusion from the Class, the Litigation and all claims

contained therein, as well as all of the Released Claims are dismissed with prejudice as to the Lead

Plaintiffs and the other Members of the Class, and as against the Released Parties. The Settling

Parties are to bear their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation.

7. The Court finds that the Stipulation and settlement are fair, reasonable, just, and

adequate as to each ofthe Settling Parties, and that the Stipulation and settlement are hereby finally

approved in all respects, and the Settling Parties are hereby directed to perform its terms.

8. Upon the Effective Date hereof, the Lead Plaintiffs and each of the Class Members

shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever

released, relinquished and discharged all Released Claims against the Released Parties, whether or

not such Class Member executes and delivers the Proof of Claim and Release form.

9. Upon the Effective Date hereof, all Class Members are hereby forever barred and

enjoined from prosecuting all Released Claims against the Released Parties.

-2-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 80 of

Page 81: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

10. Upon the Effective Date hereof, each ofthe Released Parties shall be deemed to have,

and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and

discharged all Settled Defendants' Claims against the Lead Plaintiffs, Class Members and Plaintiffs'

Counsel.

11. The Notice ofPendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action given to the Class

was the best notice practicable under the circumstances, including the individual notice to all

Members of the Class who could be identified through reasonable effort. Said notice provided the

best notice practicable under the circumstances of those proceedings and of the matters set forth

therein, including the proposed settlement set forth in the Stipulation, to all Persons entitled to such

notice, and said notice fully satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23,

§21D(a)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(7) as amended by the

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, due process , and any other applicable law.

12. Any plan of allocation submitted by Lead Plaintiffs' counsel or any order entered

regarding the attorneys' fee and expense application shall in no way disturb or affect this Final

Judgment and shall be considered separate from this Final Judgment.

13. Neither the Stipulation nor the settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or

document executed pursuant to or in furtherance ofthe Stipulation or the settlement: (a) is or may be

deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity ofany Released Claim,

or ofany wrongdoing or liability ofthe Defendants, or (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used

as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of the Defendants in any civil,

criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal.

Defendants may file the Stipulation and/or the Judgment from this action in any other action that

may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles ofres

-3-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 81 of

Page 82: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

judicata, collateral estoppel , release , good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, or any theory

of claim preclusion or issue preclusion, or similar defense or counterclaim.

14. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains

continuing jurisdiction over: (a) implementation ofthis settlement and any award or distribution of

the Settlement Fund, including interest earned thereon; (b) disposition of the Settlement Fund; and

(c) all parties hereto for the purpose of construing, enforcing and administering the Stipulation.

15. The Court finds that during the course ofthe Litigation, the Settling Parties and their

respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

11.

16. In the event that the settlement does not become effective in accordance with the

terms ofthe Stipulation or in the event that the Settlement Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to

the Defendants, then this Judgment shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in

accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated and, in such event, all orders entered and

releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in

accordance with the Stipulation.

17. There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Order and Final Judgment and

immediate entry by the Clerk ofthe Court is expressly directed pursuant to Rule 54(b) ofthe Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:THE HONORABLE TODD J. CAMPBELLUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-4-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 82 of

Page 83: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

Submitted by,

BARRETT, JOHNSTON & PARSLEYGEORGE E. BARRETT, #2672DOUGLAS S. JOHNSTON, JR. #5782TIMOTHY L. MILES, #21605

GEORGE E. BARRETT

217 Second Avenue, NorthNashville, TN 37201-1601Telephone: 615/244-2202615/252-3798 (fax)

Liaison Counsel

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLERRUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP

DARREN J. ROBBINSTOR GRONBORGJEFFREY D. LIGHTX. JAY ALVAREZRAMZIABADOU655 West Broadway, Suite 1900San Diego, CA 92101Telephone : 619/231-1058619/231-7423 (fax)

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

CAVANAGH & O'HARAWILLIAM K. CAVANAGH, JR.407 East Adams StreetSpringfield, IL 62701Telephone : 217/544-1771217/544-9894 (fax)

Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs

S:\Settlement\Direct General .set\(v1) EB-00039977.doc

-5-Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 83 of

Page 84: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 2, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk ofthe

Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail addresses

denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I have mailed the

foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF participants

indicated on the attached Manual Notice List.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 2, 2007.

s/ TOR GRONBORG

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLERRUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900San Diego, CA 92101-3301Telephone : 619/231-1058619/231-7423 (fax)

E-mail: [email protected]

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 84 of

Page 85: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

CM/ECF - DC V2. 5 (October 2005)

Mailing Information for a Case 3:05-cv-00077

Electronic Mail Notice List

The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case.

• Ramzi [email protected]

• X. Jay [email protected]

• George Edward Barrettgbarrett@barrettj ohnston.com

• Peter Q . [email protected]

• Paul Kent [email protected]

• Sean S. [email protected]

• Brigid M. [email protected] [email protected]

• Matthew M. [email protected]

• Michael L. [email protected]

• Ames [email protected] [email protected]

• James Alfred [email protected]

• Darren G. [email protected]

• Stephen W. [email protected] [email protected];[email protected]

• Tor [email protected]

• Scott P. Hilsen

Page 1 of 3

https://ec£trmac uscortsgoIcg?bin/Iv^a stp^ 1 l 405^85()^339 2987 0-1Page 85 of 8$3@8/2007

Page 86: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

CM/ECF - DC V2.5 (October 2005)

[email protected]

• Douglas S . Johnston, Jrdjohnston@barrettj ohnston. com

• Timothy L. [email protected]

• Brian 0 . O'[email protected] [email protected]

• Brian D. [email protected]

• Darren J. Robbinse file [email protected]

• Matthew Joseph Sweeney, [email protected]

• Antonio Yanez, [email protected]@willkie.com;[email protected];[email protected];lcruz1 @willkie.com

Manual Notice List

Page 2 of 3

The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case (who

therefore require manual noticing). You may wish to use your mouse to select and copy this list into

your word processing program in order to create notices or labels for these recipients.

Gordon Ball

Ball & Scott

Bank of America Center

550 Main Avenue

Suite 750Knoxville, TN 37902

Robert C. Finkel

Wolf, Popper LLP

845 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Karen Hanson Riebel

Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.

100 Washington Avenue South

Suite 2200

Minneapolis, MN 55401

Maya Susan Saxena

Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach, LLP

5200 Town Center Circle

Suite 600Boca Raton, FL 33486

Case 3 : 05-cv-00077 DQQLtmen 27?^ Ailm /,^?E/2,^87 0-1Page 86 of 8 8/2007https://ecf.tmnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Mai ist.pl.ll0 40582 - -

Page 87: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

CM/ECF - DC V2.5 (October 2005)

Steven G . Schulman

Milberg, Weiss, Bershaa,

One Pennsylvania Plaza

49th Floor

New York, NY 10119-0165

Joseph E . White, III

Milberg, Weiss, Bershad,

5200 Town Center Circle

Suite 600

Boca Raton, FL 33486

& Schulman, LLP

Hynes & Lerach, LLP

Page 3 of 3

Cjse 3 : 05-cv-00077 po^r^u eft1?^bb4O58S^0z33T-?1 470- Page 87 of 8$/2007https://ecf.tnrn .uscourts.gov/cgi-bi/N ai is .p . - -

Page 88: Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 ofsecurities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1033/DRCT05_01/...Case3:05-cv-00077 Document272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 11 of 88q 2.5

Manual Notice List

Bruce CormierAntoinette DeCampErnst & Young LLP1225 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20036202/327-6000202/327-6200 (Fax)

Case 3:05-cv-00077 Document 272 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 88 of