cases decided in the year 2005 - energy regulatory ... ar-d_ annex 4.pdfthe case was declared closed...

73

Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2005

ANNEX 4

2005-353CC

2005-340CC

2005-292CC

2005-289MC

2005-286CC

2005-285CC

2005-280CC

2005-279CC

Elesio Gatdula vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Eleazar Lorenzo vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Flaire Mendrique vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of Dispute ResolutionBetween the National Power Corporation(NPC) and Manila Electric Company(MERALCO) Regarding their TransitionSupply Contract (TSC)

Norberto Calingasan vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Roberto Sagum, Jr. vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Marie Paz Sagum vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Rowena Yoshizawa vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Elesio Gatdula represented byMaylene Cabral

Eleazar Lorenzo

Flaire Mendrique

National Power Corporation(NPC) and Power SectorAssets and LiabilitiesManagement Corporation(PSALM)

Norberto Calingasan

Roberto Sagum, Jr.

Marie Paz Sagum

Rowena Yoshizawa

Decision dated December28, 2005. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.



Decision dated November 7,2005. The ERC approved anEconomic Dispatch Protocoland directed MERALCO tonominate on a monthly anddaily basis its total systemdemand, which demand shallbe subject to the dispatchprotocol provided.


Decision dated December 9,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.



Cases Decided in the Year 2005Cases Decided in the Year 2005Cases Decided in the Year 2005Cases Decided in the Year 2005Cases Decided in the Year 2005

CASENUMBER CASE TITLE

APPLICANT/COMPLAINANT/

PETITIONERDECISION

74


2005-278-CC

2005-270CC

2005-263CC

2005-244CC

2005-241CC

2005-233CC

2005-229CC

2005-222CC

2005-218CC

2005-216CC

2005-200CC

2005-195CC

St. John Bosco Computer Institute vs.Manila Electric Company (MERALCO)

Guia de Leon Tabor vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Eduardo Cabuenos vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Rowena Fernandez vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Alice Placio vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Jose Paras vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Rodolfo Moron vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Romeo Tugnao vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Norma Osorio vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Grace Armamento vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Mila Placio vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Felicisimo Santos vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

St. John Bosco ComputerInstitute represented byGeorge Degamo

Guia de Leon Tabor

Eduardo Cabuenos

Rowena Fernandez

Alice Placio

Jose Paras

Rodolfo Moron

Romeo Tugnao

Norma Osorio

Grace Armamento

Mila Placio

Felicisimo Santos




Decision dated September28, 2005. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.


Decision dated October 18,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.







CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/

COMPLAINANT/PETITIONER

DECISIONCASENUMBER

75


2005-194CC

2005-192CC

2005-191CC

2005-190CC

2005-189CC

2005-188CC

2005-187CC

2005-183CC

2005-181CC

2005-180CC

2005-174CC

2005-173CC

2005-170CC

Teodoro J. Borcelas vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Edna S. Choa vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Edna Choa vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Hipolito Capangyarihan vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)




In Re: Petition Of AGR Kingfish VenturesCompany Limited Inc. vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Erlinda Tolentino vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Martha Valles vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Marivic Baquiran vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Alberto Aragon III vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Virginia Mendoza vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Teodoro J. Borcelas

Edna S. Choa

Edna Choa

Hipolito Capangyarihan




AGR Kingfish VenturesCompany Limited Inc.,represented by its ManagingPartner, Generoso Sison

Erlinda Tolentino

Martha Valles represented byMarife G. Valles

Marivic Baquiran

Alberto Aragon III

Virginia Mendoza

Decision dated November24, 2005. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.








Decision dated August 15,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.







DECISIONCASENUMBER

76


2005-166CC

2005-162CC

2005-161CC

2005-160-CC

2005-159CC

2005-156CC

2005-155CC

2005-153CC

2005-143CC

2005-141CC

2005-139CC

2005-138CC

Allan Conde vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Lolita Urias vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Ricardo Magno vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Evangeline Lapus vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Erlinda Chong vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Fe Makalintal-Cruz vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO) and Felicidad R.Andres

Kenneth Jill Francisco vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Jaime Caliwag vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Raymund Cobankiat vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Alex Tan vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Roselyn Paduga vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Jennifer Vasquez vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)


Decision dated July 22,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.










Decision dated November11, 2005. The case was

Allan Conde

Lolita Urias

Ricardo Magno

Evangeline Lapus

Erlinda Chong

Fe Makalintal-Cruz

Kenneth Jill Francisco

Jaime Caliwag

Raymund Cobankiat

Alex Tan

Roselyn Paduga

Jennifer Vasquez



DECISIONCASENUMBER

77


2005-136CC

2005-135CC

2005-131CC

2005-129CC

2005-128CC

2005-127CC

2005-125CC

2005-124CC

2005-121CC

2005-119CC

2005-117CC

2005-116CC

Linda Chua vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Juliana Caduhada vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Jovito Galicia vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Leoncia Gomez-Valenzuela vs. ManilaElectric Company (MERALCO)

Eden Honasan vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Evangeline Necessario vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Arleen Seli vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Carmelita Ng-Isip vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Clarita Pinawin vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Susan Valencia vs. MERALCOVebito R. Villanueva vs. Manila Electric

Company (MERALCO)

Vebito R. Villanueva vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO

Lourdes Lomahan vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

declared closed andterminated.


Decision dated July 7, 2005.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.



Decision dated September 6,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.








Linda Chua

Juliana Caduhada

Jovito Galicia

Leoncia Gomez-Valenzuela

Eden Honasan

Evangeline Necessario

Arleen Seli

Carmelita Ng-Isip

Clarita Pinawin

Susan Valencia

Vebito R. Villanueva

Lourdes Lomahan



DECISIONCASENUMBER

78


2005-115CC

2005-114CC

2005-102CC

2005-097CC

2005-095CC

2005-093CC

2005-091CC

2005-090CC

2005-085CC

2005-081CC

2005-073CC

2005-072CC

2005-071CC

William Liu vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Felipe Cecilio vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Arnold Villanueva vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Eden Honasan vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Ramon Pagaduan vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Erlinda Palting vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Manolito Sonega vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Renerio Acosta vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Fernando Basilio vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Fatima Angelita Taher vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Jhoanna Marie J. Madla vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Ma. Dolores Rocas vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Jeremiah Andaya vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)


Decision dated November 8,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.




Decision dated June 8, 2005.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.




Decision dated May 5, 2005.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.


Decision dated February 9,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.


William Liu

Felipe Cecilio

Arnold Villanueva

Eden Honasan

Ramon Pagaduan

Erlinda Palting

Manolito Sonega

Renerio Acosta

Fernando Basilio

Fatima Angelita Taher

Jhoanna Marie J. Madla

Ma. Dolores Rocas

Jeremiah Andaya



DECISIONCASENUMBER

79


2005-070CC

2005-069CC

2005-067CC

2005-060CC

2005-059CC

2005-058CC

2005-051CC

2005-050MC

2005-049CC

2005-049MC

Andy Ong vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Edgardo Medalla vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Dronico Espina vs. Countrywide Shelters,Inc. and Elizer B. Villaro

Dante Quirona vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Salvador Rodriguez vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Rhoda Dugang vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Jose Manalang vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations(Violation ofGRAM guidelines)

Jay Cesar Abad vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)



Decision dated June 21,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.



Order dated September 20,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.



Decision dated April 18,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring TEI to explain itsfailure to submit its genera-tion rate and system loss rateadjustment. The ERCaccepted TEI’s explanationthat it was due to thependency of an issue to beresolved in its unbundling ofrates application.


Decision dated April 18,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring SFELAPCO toexplain its failure to submitits generation rate and

Andy Ong

Edgardo Medalla

Dronico Espina

Dante Quirona

Salvador Rodriguez

Rhoda Dugang

Jose Manalang

Tarlac Electric Inc. (TEI)

Jay Cesar Abad

San Fernando Electric Lightand Power Company, Inc.(SFELAPCO)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

80


2005-048CC

2005-047MC

2005-046CC

2005-043CC

2005-043MC

2005-042CC

2005-040MC

Estrella Ofiana vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)


Jesus Villarosa vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Edison Rosales vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Violation of ERCOrders, Rules and Regulations(Violationof GRAM guidelines)

Danilo Reyes vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations (Violation ofGRAM guidelines)

system loss rate adjustment.The ERC acceptedSFELAPCO’s explanationthat it was due to thependency of an issue to beresolved in its unbundling ofrates application.


Decision dated April 18,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring PECO to explain itsfailure to submit its genera-tion rate and system loss rateadjustment. The ERCaccepted PECO’s explana-tion that it was due to thependency of issues to beresolved in its unbundling ofrates application.

Decision dated May 12,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.

Decision dated April 5, 2005.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.

Decision dated May 10,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring ILPI to explain itsfailure to submit its genera-tion rate and system loss rateadjustment. The ERCaccepted ILPI’s explanationthat it was due to its latereceipt of the ERC Ordercontaining the directive tosubmit the same.


Decision dated April 18,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring BLCI to explain its

Estrella Ofiana

Panay Electric Company, Inc.(PECO)

Jesus Villarosa

Edison Rosales

Iligan Light and Power Inc.(ILPI)

Danilo Reyes

Bohol Light Company, Inc.(BLCI)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

81


Fernando R. Padua vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Wilfredo Obeso vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)


Teodoro Bantigue vs, Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations (Violation of 2ndparagraph of Section 1, Rule 5, Part II ofthe IRR of Republic Act No. 9136 – non-filing of Certificate of Compliance)

Paul Tan vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Rosario Cruz vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Pacita Bañez vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

2005-040CC

2005-038CC

2005-038MC

2005-035CC

2005-033MC

2005-032CC

2005-028CC

2005-027CC

failure to submit its genera-tion rate and system loss rateadjustment. The ERCaccepted BLCI’s explanationthat it was due to pendencyof its unbundling of ratesapplication.

Decision dated March 15,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.


Decision dated April 18,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring AEC to explain itsfailure to submit its genera-tion rate and system loss rateadjustment. The ERCaccepted AEC’s explanationthat it was due to thependency of an issue to beresolved in its unbundling ofrates application.


Decision dated July 7, 2005.The case was declaredclosed and terminated on theground that GE EnergyRental Inc. and AggrekoInternational Projects, Ltd.were not involved in thegeneration, operation, orsupply of electricity.



Decision dated September14, 2005. The case was

Fernando R. Padua

Wilfredo Obeso

Angeles Electric Corporation(AEC)

Teodoro Bantigue

GE Energy Rental Inc. andAggreko InternationalProjects, Ltd.

Paul Tan Represented byGlen Ong

Rosario Cruz

Pacita Bañez



DECISIONCASENUMBER

82


Erlinda Maramag vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Petition for Approval ofthe Inclusion to ILECO I’s Retail Rate ofCosts from the Amended Electric PowerPurchase Agreement (Amended EPPA)with Avon River Power HoldingsCorporation (AVON) for the Supply of aMinimum Power of 8 MW, with Prayer forUrgent Issuance of Ex-Parte ProvisionalAuthority

Catalina Pascual vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Rubencio Cabang vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Natalia Cua vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for theAdoption of the Generation RateAdjustment Mechanism (GRAM)

Luis Arive v. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for Authorityto Adopt a Tax Recovery AdjustmentCharge in Rates of Electric Cooperatives,with Prayer for Provisional Authority

2005-025CC

2005-024RC

2005-024CC

2005-020CC

2005-019CC

2005-018RC

2005-014CC

2005-012RC

declared closed andterminated.


Decision dated December 7,2005. The petition wasapproved subject to therecoverable Base CapacityFee of PhP671.42/kW/monthand Base Energy Rate ofPhP0.50/kWh both to beindexed to the PhilippineCPI. The actual fuel costshall be recovered or passedon to ILECO I following theformula in the AmendedEPPA.




Decision dated June 8, 2005.Application was denied.CASURECO II was directedto refund PhP21,006,858.93at the rate of PhP0.1112/kWhfor 14 months or until suchtime that the full amount isrefunded.


Decision dated September27, 2005. The applicationwas dismissed due toApplicant’s failure to publishthe application itself andsubmit proof of receipt of

Erlinda Maramag

Iloilo I Electric Cooperative,Inc. (ILECO I)

Catalina Pascual

Rubencio Cabang

Natalia Cua

Camarines Sur II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(CASURECO II)

Luis Arive

Camarines Sur II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(CASURECO II)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

83


Madelaine Salvador vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Tomas Navera vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Block Power Availability Rider, withprayer for Provisional Authority

Florentino Cruz vs. Dr. Reynato Añonuevo,Dr. German De Ramos, Messrs.Nepomuceno Villanueva, JuanitoTorralba, Rodrigo Cagandahna, ArnelAbayari, Milagros Castillo and EmelynIcarangal of First Laguna ElectricCooperative, Inc.

Myrna de Guzman vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations(Violation ofdirectives embodied in a Decision datedMarch 28, 2003 under ERC Case No.2001-959)

Michael Elbinias vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations(Violation ofdirectives embodied in a Decision dated

`said application by its locallegislative body pursuant toSection 4(e), Rule 3 of theImplementing Rules andRegulations (IRR) ofRepublic Act No. 9136.



Decision dated July 13,2005. The Application wasdenied. MERALCO wasdirected to devise othermechanisms of providingdiscounts to its customers.


Decision dated April 25,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.

Decision dated March 1,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring CEBECO I toexplain its failure to imple-ment the ERC-approvedunbundled rates within theprescribed period. FindingCEBECO I’s explanationbereft of merit, it was fined atotal of PhP151,000.00.


Decision dated March 2,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)

2005-011CC

2005-006CC

2005-005RC

2005-005MC

2005-004CC

2005-004MC

2005-003CC

2005-003MC

Madelaine Salvador

Tomas Navera

Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Florentino Cruz

Myrna de Guzman

Cebu I Electric Cooperative,Inc. (CEBECO I)

Michael Elbinias

Leyte IV Electric Cooperative,Inc. (LEYECO IV)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

84


June 27, 2003 under ERC Case No.2001-938)

Rizalina I. Clasara vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Vivian Jison vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Jose Carlos Reyes vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of Preferential Rate of 20%Lower than the Prevailing Average Rateof NPC and TRANSCO to Applicant, withPrayer for Issuance of ProvisionalAuthority

Reynaldo Aniate vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Romario Aniate vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Nenita Tan vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Patricia Zaragoza vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Malaquias Santos vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

requiring LEYECO IV toexplain its failure to imple-ment the ERC-approvedunbundled rates within theprescribed period. FindingLEYECO IV’s explanationbereft of merit, it was finedPhP103,000.00.




Decision dated October 5,2005. The petition wasapproved in respect to thereduction of rates using thepricing scheme in theContract for the Supply ofElectricity (CSE) with theNPC and the change ofbilling determinant from non-coincident peak demand asstipulated in the MOA withTRANSCO.





Decision dated January 28,2005. The case was declaredclosed and terminated.

2005-001CC

2004-490

2004-483

2004-479

2004-473

2004-472

2004-471

2004-470

2004-467

Rizalina I. Clasara

Vivian Jison

Jose Carlos Reyes

SKK Steel Corporation

Reynaldo Aniate

Romario Aniate

Nenita Tan

Patricia Zaragoza

Malaquias Santos



DECISIONCASENUMBER

85


Lourdes Labrague vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Alfredo Dagsa vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Domingo Laab vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application of theRevised Rate Schedules in Compliancewith Section 36 of Republic Act No. 9136and For the Approval of Appraisal ofProperties, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority

Cris John David vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Cris John David vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Ma. Racquel Diaz vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Robert Bersal vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Nina Blanca vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Anita Quintanar vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Anita Quintanar vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Romero Aquinde vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Romero Aquinde vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

2004-464

2004-461

2004-460

2004-456

2004-455

2004-454

2004-442

2004-441

2004-435

2004-416

2004-415

2004-414

2004-413




Decision dated August 24,2005. Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (OATA)) of PhP0.3032/kWh was approved.










Lourdes Labrague

Alfredo Dagsa

Domingo Laab

Public Utility Department(PUD) - Olongapo

Cris John David

Cris John David

Ma. Racquel Diaz

Robert Bersal

Nina Blanca

Anita Quintanar

Anita Quintanar

Romero Aquinde

Romero Aquinde



DECISIONCASENUMBER

86


Eddie Vergara vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Nida Tacsagon vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Cornelio Santos vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Joaquin dela Mata vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Carlo Alonzo vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Amador Amil vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Herminia Tadena vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Jesusa Velayo vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Gemma Gile vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Victorino Obina vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Jose Obregon vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Margerie Robles vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for theRecovery of the Independent PowerProducers’ Cost under the GenerationRate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM) for

2004-410

2004-407

2004-406

2004-405

2004-404

2004-403

2004-398

2004-394

2004-392

2004-388

2004-382

2004-379

2004-377













Decision dated December20, 2004. CELCOR wasauthorized to recoverDeferred Accounting

Eddie Vergara

Nida Tacsagon

Cornelio Santos

Joaquin dela Mata

Carlo Alonzo

Amador Amil

Herminia Tadena

Jesusa Velayo

Gemma Gile

Victorino Obina

Jose Obregon

Margerie Robles

Cabanatuan Electric Corpora-tion (CELCOR)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

87


the months of April, May and June 2004

Application for the Recovery of theIndependent Power Producer’s Costunder the Generation Rate AdjustmentMechanism (GRAM) for the months ofApril, May, June, July, August andSeptember 2004

Teresa Collantes vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Wernanito Mamirta vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Divine Grace Tolentino vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Edwin Faminial vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Imelda Abayato vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Osimando Quillao vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Jannette Obar vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Cecilia Corres vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Julieta Tolentino vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for theRecovery of the Independent PowerProducers’ Cost under the GenerationRate Adjustment Mechanism (GRAM)

2004-431

2004-374

2004-373

2004-372

2004-363

2004-361

2004-360

2004-355

2004-354

2004-353

2004-3462005-003RC

Adjustment (DAA) in theamount of PhP28,065,004.00for the test period April 2004to September 2004 at therate of PhP0.1897/kWh for aperiod of 12 months or untilsuch time that the full amountshall have been recovered.










Decision dated February 24,2005. ISELCO I wasauthorized to recoverPhP21,635,539.83 for thetest period April 2004-October 2004 at the rate ofPhP0.0836/kWh for a periodof 18 months or until such

Teresa Collantes

Wernanito Mamirta

Divine Grace Tolentino

Edwin Faminial

Imelda Abayato

Osimando Quillao

Jannette Obar

Cecilia Corres

Julieta Tolentino

Isabela I Electric Cooperative,Inc. (ISELCO I)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

88


Willy Antiporda vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Margarita Dimla vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Randy Abuyen vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Purisima Buraga vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Philippine Foremost Milling Corporation,represented by its Executive Vice-President Engr. Erwin Que vs. PanayElectric Company, Inc. (PECO)

In the Matter of the Petition for Approval /Review of the Power Supply Agreement(PSA)

In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations(Failure to reducerates due to loan condonation)

2004-345

2004-342

2004-337

2004-333

2004-327

2004-321

2004-315

time that the full amount isrecovered.





Decision dated December12, 2005. The Memorandumof Understanding (MOU)between NPC and PhilippineForemost Milling Corporation(PFMC) was approved.PECO is ordered to ceaseand desist from doing anyand all acts that wouldprevent PFMC’s directconnection with NPC.

Decision dated October 7,2005. The PSA was approvedsubject to the use of TOURates of NPC and reductionin rates equivalent to 50% ofthe 3% Dispatch Fee.

Decision dated February 8,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring NUVELCO toexplain its failure to reduceits rates due to the condona-tion of its loans effectiveOctober 2003. FindingNUVELCO’s explanationbereft of merit, it was finedPhP130,500.00.

Willy Antiporda

Margarita Dimla

Randy Abuyen

Purisima Buraga

Philippine Foremost MillingCorporation (PFMC)

Cebu III Electric Cooperative,Inc. (CEBECO III) andToledo Power Company(TPOC)

Nueva Vizcaya ElectricCooperative, Inc.(NUVELCO)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

89


Mercidita Sermon vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of Application for Approval ofExchange of Properties

Remedios Villanueva vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Atty. Edgardo Soriano vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Noel Poblador vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Josefina Mopon vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Rolando Yap vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Pastor Escobedo vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Pastor Escobedo vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Ricardo Diaz vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

2004-313

2004-312

2004-310

2004-306

2004-304

2004-302

2004-297

2004-294

2004-293

2004-291


Decision dated October 14,2005. The Deed of Exchangeinvolving a portion of theMERALCO land and SciencePark of the Philippines(SPPI) land in Cabuyao,Laguna, consisting of 620sq.m. was approved. TheCommission further ruled thatthe subject property contain-ing an area of 4,700 sq.m.(including the 620 sq.m.subject of exchange deed)should be excluded from therate base, it having beenacquired gratuitously.









Mercidita Sermon


Remedios Villanueva

Atty. Edgardo Soriano

Noel Poblador

Josefina Mopon

Rolando Yap

Pastor Escobedo

Pastor Escobedo

Ricardo Diaz



DECISIONCASENUMBER

90


Rosenda Guerrero vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Lawrence Uy vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Jesse Cervera vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Jesusa Camacho-Hara vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Dionisio Castro vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Glenn Elivera vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Venna Mariano vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Delia Bondame vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Remedios Reonal vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Ma. Victoria Yelo vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for Authorityto Adopt a Tax Recovery AdjustmentCharge in the Rates of Electric Coopera-tives, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority

2004-281

2004-280

2004-278

2004-269

2004-265

2004-263

2004-261

2004-258

2004-247

2004-245

2004-238











Decision dated September27, 2005. Application wasdismissed due to theApplicants’ failure to publishthe application itself andsubmit proof of receipt ofsaid application by their locallegislative bodies pursuant toSection 4(e), Rule 3 of theImplementing Rules andRegulations (IRR) ofRepublic Act No. 9136.

Rosenda Guerrero

Lawrence Uy

Jesse Cervera

Jesusa Camacho-Hara

Dionisio Castro

Glenn Elivera

Venna Mariano

Delia Bondame

Remedios Reonal

Ma. Victoria Yelo

Region VIII Electric Coopera-tives (Northern SamarElectric Cooperative, Inc.[NORSAMELCO], Samar IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[SAMELCO I], Leyte IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[LEYECO II], Leyte IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[LEYECO III], Leyte VElectric Cooperative, Inc.[LEYECO V], Southern



DECISIONCASENUMBER

91


Celestino Esteban vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Celestino Esteban vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Angelito Reyes vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for Authorityto Implement the Local Franchise FeeRate in the City of Valenzuela, withPrayer for Provisional Authority

Esperidion Penalver vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Lynne Villanueva vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Evangeline Graciadas vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations(Unloading ofGaya-gaya Bank No. 1, FlexibilityImprovement of Taguig 49ZL and Dolores44XM and Unloading of North Port 405Hwithout approval)

Fe Tupas vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)




Decision dated March 1,2005. A local franchise feerate of 75% of 1% of the totalgross annual receipt obtainedin Valenzuela City wasapproved.




Decision dated February 21,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring MERALCO toexplain its construction ofvarious distribution projectswithout prior approval fromthe ERC. FindingMERALCO’s explanationbereft of merit, it was finedPhP348,900.00.


Leyte Electric Cooperative,Inc. [SOLECO])

Celestino Esteban

Celestino Esteban

Angelito Reyes


Esperidion Penalver

Lynne Villanueva

Evangeline Graciadas


Fe Tupas

2004-234

2004-233

2004-225

2004-224

2004-222

2004-221

2004-219

2004-215

2004-212



DECISIONCASENUMBER

92


Beatriz Cabiling vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Gloria Alejo vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Debora Anastacia Layugan vs. ManilaElectric Company (MERALCO)

Rebecca delos Reyes vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof Extension of Lines Implemented from1996 to 2002

In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Proposed GenerationRates for Luzon, Visayas and MindanaoGrids, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority


2004-196

2004-195

2004-185

2004-182

2004-181

2004-178

2004-160

Beatriz Cabiling representedby Ma. Victoria Libunao

Gloria Alejo represented byMa. Victoria Libunao

Debora Anastacia Layugan

Rebecca delos Reyes


National Power Corporation(NPC) and Power SectorAssets and LiabilitiesManagement Corporation(PSALM)

Region IV Electric Coopera-tives (Aurora ElectricCooperative, Inc.[AURELCO], Batangas IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[BATELEC I], Batangas IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[BATELEC II], BusuangaIsland Electric Cooperative,Inc. [BISELCO], FirstLaguna Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. [FLECO], LubangIsland Electric Cooperative,Inc. [LUBELCO],Marinduque ElectricCooperative, Inc.[MARELCO], MarinduqueElectric Cooperative, Inc.[OMECO], Oriental MindoroElectric Cooperative, Inc.[ORMECO], PalawanElectric Cooperative, Inc.[PALECO], Quezon II





Decision dated August 12,2005. The application wasapproved and SFELAPCOwas directed to pay a permitfee in the amount ofPhP486,578.88.

Decision dated April 13,2005. NPC was authorized toimplement an overallweighted average rateadjustment of PhP1.0354/kWh.




DECISIONCASENUMBER

93


2004-159

2004-154

2004-142


Ma. Teresita Banaag vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application forAuthority to Adopt a Tax RecoveryAdjustment Charge in the Rates ofElectric Cooperatives, with Prayer forProvisional Authority

Electric Cooperative, Inc.[QUEZELCO II], RomblonElectric Cooperative, Inc.[ROMELCO], Tablas IslandElectric Cooperative, Inc.[TIELCO])

Region II ElectricCooperatives(BatanesElectric Cooperative, Inc.[BATANELCO], Cagayan IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[CAGELCO I], Cagayan IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[CAGELCO II], Isabela lElectric Cooperative, Inc.[ISELCO I], Isabela lIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[ISELCO II], Nueva VizcayaElectric Cooperative, Inc.[NUVELCO], QuirinoElectric Cooperative, Inc.[QUIRELCO])

Ma. Teresita Banaag

Region IX and XI ElectricCooperatives (BasilanElectric Cooperative, Inc.[BASELCO], Sulu ElectricCooperative, Inc.[SULECO], Tawi-TawiElectric Cooperative, Inc.[TAWELCO], ZamboangaCity Electric Cooperative,Inc. [ZAMCELCO],Zamboanga del NorteElectric Cooperative, Inc.[ZANECO], Zamboanga lElectric Cooperative, Inc.[ZAMSURECO I],Zamboanga Il ElectricCooperative, Inc.[ZAMSURECO II], Siasilsland Electric Cooperative,Inc. [SIASELCO], Cagayande Sulu Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. [CASELCO],Lanao del Sur ElectricCooperative, Inc.[LASURECO],Maguindanao Electric






DECISIONCASENUMBER

94


2004-141

2004-140



Cooperative, Inc.[MAGELCO], Danao delNorte Electric Cooperative,Inc. [DANECO], Davao delNorte Electric Cooperative,Inc. [DORECO], SouthCotabato l Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. [SOCOTECO I],South Cotabato Il ElectricCooperative, Inc.[SOCOTECO II], NorthCotabato Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. [COTELCO],Sultan Kudarat ElectricCooperative, Inc.[SUKELCO])

Region V Electric Coopera-tives (Albay ElectricCooperative, Inc. [ALECO],Camarines Norte ElectricCooperative, Inc.[CANORECO], CamarinesSur I Electric Cooperative,Inc. [CASURECO I],Camarines Sur III ElectricCooperative, Inc.[CASURECO III],Camarines Sur IV ElectricCooperative, Inc.[CASURECO IV], FirstCatanduanes ElectricCooperative, Inc.[FICELCO], MasbateElectric Cooperative, Inc.[MASELCO], Sorsogon IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[SORECO I], Ticao lslandElectric Cooperative, Inc.[TISELCO])

Region III Electric Coopera-tives (Peninsula ElectricCooperative, Inc.[PENELCO], Nueva Ecija IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[NEECO I], Nueva Ecija IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[NEECO II], Pampanga IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[PELCO I], Pampanga IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[PELCO II], Pampanga IIIElectric Cooperative, Inc.





DECISIONCASENUMBER

95


In the Matter of the Application for Approvalthe Approval of the New Rate Adjust-ments in the Amount of P0.8528/kwh inAccordance with the Provision of R.A.9136, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority

Jeffrey Reniz vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Eliseo Merico vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Lorena Manalo vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Interim Sub-transmissionCost Adjustment Rate/Recovery (ICRA)Methodology for Qualified DistributionUtilities Buying Part or Portion of theSub-transmission Facilities of theNational Transmission Corporation, withPrayer for Provisional Authority

Application for Authority to Secure (a) aOne Hundred Eighty Five Million(Php185,000,000.00) Peso Long TermLoan and (b) Omnibus Line with theDevelopment Bank of the Philippines(DBP) and/or Other Financial Institution,with Prayer for Provisional Authority

[PELCO III], PampangaRural Electric Cooperative,Inc. [PRESCO], Tarlac IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[TARELCO I], Tarlac IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[TARELCO II], Zambales IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[ZAMECO I], Zambales IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[ZAMECO II])

Sorsogon I Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (SORECO I)

Jeffrey Reniz represented byLanie Delfin

Eliseo Merico

Lorena Manalo

National TransmissionCorporation (TRANSCO)

Subic Enerzone Corporation(SEZ)

2004-139

2004-131

2004-130

2004-128

2004-114

2004-101

Decision dated April 14,2005. The application forrevised rate amounting to anOverall Tariff Adjustment(Overall Tariff Adjustment(OATA)) of PhP0.8529/kWhwas modified to PhP0.2128/kWh.




Decision dated March 17,2005. The ICRA Methodologywas approved subject tocertain conditions.

Decision dated October 24,2005. The application wasapproved subject to certainconditions (i.e. proceedsshall not be used for anypurpose other than thosestated in the application,proceeds of the loan and thecorresponding capitalexpenditures shall berecorded in a separate book,etc).



DECISIONCASENUMBER

96



In the Matter of the Petition for Approval/Review of the Electricity Supply Agree-ment (ESA) with Trans-Asia Oil andEnergy Development Corporation, withPrayer for Provisional Authority

Application for Approval of the Memoran-dum of Agreement entered into by andbetween Applicant SFELAPCO andMansons Corporation.


2004-096

2004-092

2004-086

2004-062

Region I and CordilleraAutonomous Region (CAR)Electric Cooperatives(Ilocos Norte ElectricCooperative, Inc. [INEC],Ilocos Sur Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. [ISECO], La UnionElectric Cooperative, Inc.[LUELCO], Pangasinan IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[PANELCO I], CentralPangasinan ElectricCooperative, Inc.[CENPELCO], PangasinanIII Electric Cooperative, Inc.[PANELCO III], AbraElectric Cooperative, Inc.[ABRECO], BenguetElectric Cooperative, Inc.[BENECO], MountainProvince Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. [MOPRECO],Ifugao Electric Cooperative,Inc. [IFELCO], KalingaApayao Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. [KAELCO])

Guimaras Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (GUIMELCO) andTrans-Asia Oil EnergyDevelopment Corporation(TA OIL)


Region X and CARAGAElectric Cooperatives (FirstBukidnon Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. [FIBECO],Camiguin Island ElectricCooperative, Inc.[CAMELCO], MisamisOccidental I ElectricCooperative, Inc. [MOELCII], Misamis Occidental II


Decision dated October 13,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority granted relative tothe ESA was made perma-nent. TA OIL’s generationcost of PhP6.10/kWh waslower than NPC’s(PhP6.2553/kWh).

Decision dated August 26,2005. The transfer ofManson’s Assets toSFELAPCO forPhP59,300,000.00 wasapproved.

Decision dated September27, 2005. Application wasdismissed due to theApplicants’ failure to publishthe application itself andsubmit proof of receipt ofsaid application by their locallegislative bodies pursuant toSection 4(e), Rule 3 of theImplementing Rules and



DECISIONCASENUMBER

97



2004-061

Electric Cooperative, Inc.[MOELCI II], Bukidnon IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[BUSECO II], Lanao delNorte Electric Cooperative,Inc. [LANECO], Agusan delNorte Electric Cooperative,Inc. [ANECO], Agusan delSur Electric Cooperative,Inc. [ASELCO], DinagatIsland Electric Cooperative,Inc. [DIELCO], SiargaoElectric Cooperative, Inc.[SIARELCO], SurigaoElectric Cooperative, Inc.[SURNECO], Surigao delSur I Electric Cooperative,Inc. [SURSECO I], &Surigao del Sur II ElectricCooperative, Inc.[SURSECO II])

Region VI, VII, and VIIIElectric Cooperatives (AklanElectric Cooperative, Inc.[AKELCO], Antique ElectricCooperative, Inc.[ANTECO], Capiz ElectricCooperative, Inc.[CAPELCO], GuimarasElectric Cooperative, Inc.[GUIMELCO], Iloilo IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[ILECO I], Iloilo II ElectricCooperative, Inc. [ILECO II],Iloilo III Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. [ILECO III],Central Negros ElectricCooperative, Inc.[CENECO], NegrosOccidental Electric Coop-erative, Inc. [NOCECO], V-M-C Electric Cooperative,Inc. [VRESCO], BantayanElectric Cooperative, Inc.[BANELCO], Bohol IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[BOHECO I], Bohol IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[BOHECO II], CamotesIsland Electric Cooperative,Inc. [CELCO], Cebu IElectric Cooperative, Inc.[CEBECO I], Cebu II

Regulations (IRR) ofRepublic Act No. 9136.




DECISIONCASENUMBER

98


Purita Vibal vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Purita Vibal vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Jeremias Baluyot vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Narciso Aguirre vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Leodegario Martinez/ Elvira Escalante vs.MERALCO

Rose Ana Diaz vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

Rafael Marinas vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations (Failure to collectthe approved final UC-ME rate)

2004-054

2004-041

2004-036

2004-034

2004-033

2004-031

2004-028

2004-025

Electric Cooperative, Inc.[CEBECO II], Cebu IIIElectric Cooperative, Inc.[CEBECO III], NegrosOriental I Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. [NORECO I],Negros Oriental II ElectricCooperative, Inc. [NORECOII], Province of SiquijorElectric Cooperative, Inc.[PROSIELCO], & Leyte IVElectric Cooperative, Inc.[LEYECO IV])

Purita Vibal

Purita Vibal

Jeremias Baluyot

Narciso Aguirre

Leodegario Martinez/ ElviraEscalante

Rose Ana Diaz

Rafael Marinas

Misamis Occidental I ElectricCooperative, Inc. (MOELCII)








Decision dated March 1,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring MOELCI I to explainits failure to collect theapproved final UC-ME rate.Finding MOELCI I’s explana-tion meritorious, the ERCrefrained from imposingadministrative fees andpenalties and merely directedit to recover the difference



DECISIONCASENUMBER

99


In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations(Failure to collectthe approved final UC-ME rate)

In the Matter of the Application for Authorityto Implement/Change the LocalFranchise Fee Rate in the Cities andMunicipalities of Quezon, Caloocan,Calamba, Makati, Muntinlupa, Pasig,Malabon, Navotas, Taguig, and SanJuan, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority

Lilibeth Llanos vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Magdalena Andagan vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

2004-024

2004-011

2004-06

2003-576

Biliran Electric Cooperative,Inc. (BILECO)


Lilibeth Llanos

Magdalena Andagan

between the provisionallyapproved UC-ME rate ofPhP0.0168/kWh and theapproved final UC-ME rate ofPhP0.0373/kWh by collectingthe arrearages within aperiod of six (6) months.

Decision dated March 1,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring BILECO to explainits failure to collect theapproved final UC-ME rate.Finding BILECO’s explana-tion meritorious, the ERCrefrained from imposingadministrative fees andpenalties and merely directedit to recover the differencebetween the provisionallyapproved UC-ME rate ofPhP0.0168/kWh and theapproved UC-ME rate ofPhP0.0373/kWh by collectingthe arrearages within aperiod of four (4) months.

Decision dated April 19,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority granted toMERALCO to change thelocal franchise tax in QuezonCity, Caloocan City, andCalamba City was madepermanent. Further, authoritywas granted to implement alocal franchise fee inMuntinlupa City and PasigCity. Prayers for similarauthority in Makati, Malabon,Navotas, Taguig, and SanJuan were denied withoutprejudice.





DECISIONCASENUMBER

100


Buenaventura Duran vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Ronaldo Reyes vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Ruth Tuazon vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

SMO Devt. Corp. vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

Moses Ponteras/ Primeville Food Coop. vs.Manila Electric Company (MERALCO)

Teresita Lopez vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

Rodrigo Fabro vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for Authorityto Obtain $4,000,000.00 Loan and toEnter into a Mortgage Agreement toSecure the Loan

In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliancewith Section 60 of Republic Act No. 9136and Executive Order No. 119, with Prayerfor Provisional Authority

Elena Hubayan/ Iñigo Hubayan vs. ManilaElectric Company (MERALCO)

Bartolome Bernardo vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

2003-567

203-555

2003-550

2003-532

2003-531

2003-507

2003-511

2003–462

2003-458

2003-447

2003-427








Decision dated September12, 2005. The ProvisionalAuthority granted toCEPALCO to obtain loan andenter into mortgage agree-ment to secure loan wasmade permanent.

Decision dated May 23,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.4965/kWh.


Decision dated December 28, 2005. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.

Buenaventura Duran

Ronaldo Reyes representedby Alvin Cruz

Ruth Tuazon

SMO Devt. Corp. representedby Moses Ponteras

Moses Ponteras/ PrimevilleFood Coop.

Teresita Lopez

Rodrigo Fabro

Cagayan Electric Power andLight Company, Inc.(CEPALCO)

Lanao del Sur ElectricCooperative, Inc.(LASURECO)

Elena Hubayan/ IñigoHubayan

Bartolome Bernardo



DECISIONCASENUMBER

101


Jessica Lucila Reyes vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliancewith Section 60 of Republic Act No. 9136and Executive Order No. 119, withPrayer for Provisional Authority


Francisco Cabali vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)




2003-420

2003-418

2003-391

2003-379

2003-373

2003-372

2003-371

Decision dated October 16,2005. MERALCO is directedto provide Ms. Reyes withelectric service in accordancewith her requirements asprovided in her electricalplans, load schedule, anddesign standards without anycompulsion to or condition tosubscribe to MERALCO’sSeries B Preferred Shares.

Decision dated June 30,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.1806/kWh.

Decision dated February 22,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.5608/kWh.


Decision dated March 16,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.2196/kWh.


Decision dated February 21,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.2657/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provision

Jessica Lucila Reyes

Sulu Electric Cooperative, Inc.(SULECO)

Busuanga Island ElectricCooperative, Inc.(BISELCO)

Francisco Cabali

Zamboanga del Sur II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ZAMSURECO II)

Camarines Sur III ElectricCooperative, Inc.(CASURECO III)

Masbate Electric Cooperative,Inc. (MASELCO)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

102







2003-367

2003-365

2003-353

2003-352

2003-323

ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.

Decision dated March 16,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.5025/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.

Decision dated February 22,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.3862/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.



Decision dated March 15,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.5758/kWh. Thedifference between the

Tawi-Tawi Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (TAWELCO)

Leyte I Electric Cooperative,Inc. (LEYECO I)

Leyte IV Electric Cooperative,Inc. (LEYECO IV)

Camotes Island ElectricCooperative, Inc. (CELCO)

Marinduque Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (MARELCO)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

103


reduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.



Decision dated January 10,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.2287/kWh.

Decision dated November10, 2004. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.1437/kWh.

Decision dated July 5, 2005.The Provisional Authority wasmade permanent resulting inan average reduction in ratesof PhP0.1723/kWh.


Decision dated February 23,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-

2003-322

2003-319

2003-318

2003-307

2003-306

2003-185

2003-184







In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliancewith Section 60 of Republic Act No. 9136

Ticao Island Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (TISELCO)

Southern Leyte ElectricCooperative, Inc.(SOLECO)

Maguindanao ElectricCooperative, Inc.(MAGELCO)

Zamboanga Del Sur I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ZAMSURECO I)

Zamboanga del Norte ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ZANECO)

Davao del norte ElectricCooperative, Inc.(DANECO)

Aklan Electric Cooperative,Inc. (AKELCO)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

104


and Executive Order No. 119, with Prayerfor Provisional Authority

In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations(Increase in non-recurring rates without ERC’s approval)


In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliance withSection 60 of Republic Act No. 9136 andExecutive Order No. 119, with Prayer forProvisional Authority



2003-175

2003-166

2003-160

2003-155

2003-154

Lanao del Norte ElectricCooperative, Inc. (LANECO)

Romblon Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (ROMELCO)

Central Negros ElectricCooperative, Inc.(CENECO)

Lubang Island ElectricCooperative, Inc.(LUBELCO)

Cagayan I Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (CAGELCO I)

nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.3509/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.

Decision dated February 28,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring LANECO to explainits increase in non-recurringrates without ERC’s ap-proval. The ERC, uponshowing of good faith on thepart of LANECO, refrainedfrom imposing administrativefines and penalties. However,LANECO was directed toeffect a refund to consumersaffected by the increase innon-recurring rates notsanctioned by the ERC.

Decision dated May 16,2005. The ProvisionalAuthor54ity was madepermanent resulting in anaverage reduction in rates ofPhP0.2086/kWh.

Decision dated September 6,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.0886/kWh.





DECISIONCASENUMBER

105





Ronald Talion vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations(Violation ofdirectives embodied in a Decision datedApril 24, 1996 under ERB Case NO. 95-41)


2003-149

2003-147

2003-144

2003-141

2003-126

2003-125





Decision dated January 31,2005. The ERC issued aShow Cause Order (SCO)requiring CELCOR to explainits failure to charge a ratePhP0.05/kWh lower than thatof the NPC for a period of642 days and for commenc-ing the commercial operationof two (2) additional generat-ing units and including thecost thereof in the PPAcomputation without ERC’sprior approval. FindingCELCOR’s explanation bereftof merit, it was finedPhP306,400.00.

Decision dated February 21,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.5641/kWh. The

Misamis Oriental I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(MORESCO I)

Abra Electric Cooperative,Inc. (ABRECO)

Palawan Electric Cooperative,Inc. (PALECO)

Ronald Talion

Cabanatuan Electric Corpora-tion (CELCOR)

Province of Siquijor ElectricCooperative, Inc.(PROSIELCO)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

106







In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliancewith Section 60 of Republic Act No. 9136

2003-124

2003-120

2003-116

2003-115

2003-114

2003-110

difference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.


Decision dated August 23,2004. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.4067/kWh.


Decision dated April 14,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.2470/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.


Decision dated July 5, 2005.The Provisional Authority wasmade permanent resulting in

Cebu II Electric Cooperative,Inc. (CEBECO II)

Agusan del Sur ElectricCooperative, Inc. (ASELCO)

Negros Oriental I ElectricCooperative, Inc. (NORECOI)

Cebu I Electric Cooperative,Inc. (CEBECO I)

Agusan del Norte ElectricCooperative, Inc. (ANECO)

First Catanduanes ElectricCooperative, Inc.(FICELCO)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

107


and Executive Order No. 119, withPrayer for Provisional Authority






an average reduction in ratesof PhP1.0720/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.


Decision dated May 3, 2005.The Provisional Authority wasmade permanent resulting inan average reduction in ratesof PhP0.2874/kWh.

Decision dated November11, 2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.4505/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.

Decision dated October 8,2004. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.2108/kWh.

Decision dated November16, 2004. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP1.1636/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.

2003-106

2003-102

2003-092

2003-091

2003-089

Batangas I Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (BATELEC I)

Occidental Mindoro ElectricCooperative, Inc. (OMECO)

Biliran Electric Cooperative,Inc. (BILECO)

First Bukidnon ElectricCooperative, Inc. (FIBECO)

Siargao Island ElectricCooperative, Inc.(SIARELCO)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

108










Aurora Electric Cooperative,Inc. (AURELCO)

First Laguna Electric Coop-erative, Inc. (FLECO)

Kalinga Apayao ElectricCooperative, Inc. (KAELCO)

Camarines Sur I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(CASURECO I)

Benguet Electric Cooperative,Inc. (BENECO)

Iloilo I Electric Cooperative,Inc. (ILECO I)

Iloilo II Electric Cooperative,Inc. (ILECO II)

Antique Electric Cooperative,Inc. (ANTECO)

2003-088

2003–083

2003-073

2003-072

2003-070

2003-068

2003-062

2003-061


Decision dated July 6, 2005.The Provisional Authority wasmade permanent resulting inan average reduction in ratesof PhP0.4912/kWh.

Decision dated April 19,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.6357/kWh.


Decision dated December21, 2004. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.0845/kWh.


Decision dated June 27,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.3310/kWh.

Decision dated August 24,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.3106/kWh. The



DECISIONCASENUMBER

109






2003-059

2003-058

2003-057

2003-033




Decision dated June 30,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction of PhP0.0578/kWh.The difference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.

Partial Decision dated June14, 2005. The ProvisionalAuthorities were madepermanent resulting in anaverage reduction ofPhP0.6093/kWh, PhP0.0837/kWh, PhP0.3799/kWh,PhP0.1874/kWh, PhP0.4492/kWh, and PhP0.3406/kWhrespectively insofar asNEECO II, PENELCO,TARELCO I & II, andZAMECO I & II wereconcerned. NEECO I’spetition is still undergoingfurther evaluation.

Quirino Electric Cooperative,Inc. (QUIRELCO)

Bohol I Electric Cooperative,Inc. (BOHECO I)

Zamboanga City ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ZAMCELCO)

Nueva Ecija I ElectricCooperative, Inc. (NEECOI)Nueva Ecija II ElectricCooperative, Inc. (NEECOII)Peninsula ElectricCooperative, Inc.(PENELCO)Tarlac I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(TARELCO I)Tarlac IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.(TARELCO II)Zambales IElectric Cooperative, Inc.(ZAMECO I)Zambales IIElectric Cooperative, Inc.(ZAMECO II)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

110



In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliance withSection 60 of Republic Act No. 9136 andExecutive Order No. 119, with Prayer forProvisional Authority





Decision dated July 20,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction of PhP0.3559/kWh.The difference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.




Decision dated May 3, 2005.The Provisional Authority wasmade permanent resulting inan average reduction in ratesof PhP0.1421/kWh.

Decision dated June 27,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.1854/kWh. The

Isabela I Electric Cooperative,Inc. (ISELCO I)

Cagayan I Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (CAGELCO I)

Ilocos Sur Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (ISECO)

Central Pangasinan ElectricCooperative, Inc.(CENPELCO)

La Union Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (LUELCO)

Capiz Electric Cooperative,Inc. (CAPELCO)

2003-026

2003-025

2003-024

2003-023

2003-022

2003-020



DECISIONCASENUMBER

111










Decision dated May 23,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.3787/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.

Decision dated July 13,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates ofPhP0.1561/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provision-ally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.

Decision dated July 13,2005. The ProvisionalAuthority was made perma-nent resulting in an averagereduction in rates of

2003-014

2003-013

2003-012

2003-011

2002-343

Ilocos Norte Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (INEC)

Bohol II Electric Cooperative,Inc.(BOHECO II)

Oriental Mindoro ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ORMECO)

Pangasinan III ElectricCooperative, Inc.(PANELCO III)

Batangas II Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (BATELEC II)



DECISIONCASENUMBER

112


PhP0.2515/kWh. Thedifference between thereduction in rates provisionally granted and the finalreduction is ordered re-funded.

Decision dated February 16,2005. The ERC approved theinstallation and operation oftwo (2) 69 KV Systems and13.8 KV Transmission Linesto prevent overloading. Apermit fee of PhP248,181.94was imposed.


Decision dated March 7,2005. Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (OATA)) of PhP0.8106/kWh was approved.

Decision dated December20, 2004. Overall TariffAdjustment (Overall TariffAdjustment (OATA)) ofPhP0.1774/kWh wasapproved.ERC approved MECO’s netutility plant in service as ofMay 17, 1999 at sound valueof PhP291,496,900.00.

Decision dated January 24,2005. Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (OATA)) ofPhP(0.2711)/kWh wasapproved.

Decision dated January 10,2005. Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (OATA)) ofPhP(0.0111)/kWh wasapproved.

Decision dated January 10,2005. Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (Overall Tariff Adjust


Mario Cruz

Lanao del Sur ElectricCooperative, Inc.(LASURECO)

Mactan Electric Company,Inc. (MECO)

Sulu Electric Cooperative, Inc.(SULECO)

Nueva Ecija I ElectricCooperative, Inc.

(NEECO I)

Tawi-Tawi Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (TAWELCO)

Application for Authority to Install andOperate Two (2) 69 KV Systems and13.8 KV Transmission Lines to be BuiltUnder the 69 KV Systems

Mario Cruz vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)

In the Matter of the Petition for Approval ofRevised Rates of a Distribution UtilitiesResulting from Unbundling of Rates

Application for Approval of UnbundledRates Pursuant to the Provision ofRepublic Act No. 9136Petition forApproval of Reappraisal of Assets inService

In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Unbundled Rates Pursuant to theProvisions of Republic Act No. 9136



2002-330

2002-316

2002-223

2002-164

2001-48598-78

2002–029

2002–025

2002-021



DECISIONCASENUMBER

113


ment (OATA)) of PhP0.3893/kWh was approved.

Decision dated March 7,2005. Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (OATA)) ofPhP(0.2815)/kWh wasapproved.

Decision dated January 28,2005. Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (Overall Tariff Adjust-ment (OATA)) of PhP0.6132/kWh was approved.

Decision dated Jan 19, 2005.Overall Tariff Adjustment(Overall Tariff Adjustment(OATA)) of PhP0.3211/kWhwas approved.


Zambales II Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (ZAMECO II)

Kalinga Apayao ElectricCooperative, Inc. (KAELCO)

Siasi Electric Cooperative,Inc. (SIASELCO)

Vicente Chotangco




Vicente Chotangco vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)

2001-990

2001-975

2001-986

2001-880



DECISIONCASENUMBER

114


cases decided in the year 2005 - energy regulatory ... ar-d_ annex 4.pdfthe case was declared closed...

Documents