caution! jet blast on apron - iata - home e-taxi... · lkpr / prg 11 km distance from the downtown...
TRANSCRIPT
LKPR / PRG
11 km distance from the downtown
13 million PAX in 2016 (15 mil. expected 2017)
137k MVTS in 2016 (max. 179k in 2008)
46 MVTS per hour of declared capacity
RWY 06/24: 3715x45 m
RWY 12/30: 3250x45 m
Terminal 1: Schengen
Terminal 2: Non-Schengen
Terminal 3: General Aviation
Terminal 4: Military
2 cargo terminals
5 APRONs
90 aircraft parking stands
A380 + B747-8 regularly4
Prague Airport Václav HavelMain Gateway to the Czech Republic
5
1937 FIRST FLIGHT
1968 TERMINAL NORTH 1 AREA OPENED
1990 - 2005 TERMINAL 1 EXPANSION
1995 3,000,000 PAX
2003 START OF T2 CONSTRUCTION
2005 10,800,000 PAX
2006 TERMINAL 2 OPENED
2007 VOTED BEST AIRPORT IN CEE
2008 12,630,000 PAX, 175,000 MVT
2009 VOTED BEST AIRPORT IN EE
2011 IATA EAGLE AWARD
2012 TOTAL RWY RECONSTRUCTION
2013 A380 CERTIFICATION
2015 TRIPLE-BRIDGE GATE FOR A380
2016 2nd ROUTES EUROPE AWARDS 2016
2016 13,040,000 PAX
2017 80 YEARS ANNIVERSARY, 15 MPAX EXPECTED
MILESTONES IN AIRPORT’S HISTORY
Prague Airport Václav HavelMilestones
www.prg.aero/safety/
8
… Five-star Airport Safety
ThinkCalm downDo
Check Write down
t +420 220 112 645
m +420 724 550 576
Prague Airport
K Letišti 6/1019
160 08 Prague 6
Contacts
Ing. Libor Kurzweil, Ph.D.
Director SMS, SeMS, QM
Safety Manager
10
Regulations related to Jet Blast
1. ICAO Annex 14
- requirement for a runway blast pad
- note for deicing pads and TWY bridges
- Jetblast on Apron? NIL!
2. ICAO Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 2
- extensive guidance material
- see Appendix to this presentation
3. EASA CS-ADR-DSN (design specifications
for aerodromes)
- corresponds to ICAO Annex 14
4. Manufacturer’s aircraft manuals for Airport planning
- diagrams of Jetblast contours on idle / breakaway / takeoff power
- jetblast velocity safe to personnel is not specified
38Issued: May 2016
Created 2016 by Prague Airport, Safety Management DepartmentFeel free to distribute. Email us if you want to be added to the distribution list or removed
www.prg.aero/safety [email protected]
Target audience: All ground staff, managers
……… briefsSafety……..
Areas marked in redmay be affected by exhaust gases ofvelocities, that mightendanger people. No presence of staffand passengers duringtaxi of A380!Safe distance behindthe aircraft is 130 m
15
PragueThree piers with bays in between90° turns in front of aircraft stands
Taxi situations, where safe distanceson breakaway power recommendedby manufacturers are not met
16
Singapore ChangiPiers with bays in between90° turns in front of aircraft stands
Taxi situations, where safe distanceson breakaway power recommendedby manufacturers are not met
17
FrankfurtPiers with bays in between90° turns in front of aircraft stands
Taxi situations, where safe distanceson breakaway power recommendedby manufacturers are not met
18
JFKPiers with bays in between90° turns in front of aircraft stands
Taxi situations, where safe distanceson breakaway power recommendedby manufacturers are not met
19
London HeathrowPiers with bays in between90° turns in front of aircraft stands
Taxi situations, where safe distanceson breakaway power recommendedby manufacturers are not met
23
Safety Risks
Idle power is not that risky.
Caution is neccessary in situation when breakaway power is used:
1. when applying breakaway power to get the aircraft moving that temporarily a high or
medium power setting is required.
- expectable situations: commencing taxi from stand / after push
- non-expectable situations: interrupting and stopping taxi for any reason
2. when an arriving aircraft is turning on to the stand centreline. The risk is further
increased if for any reason the aircraft stops, then applies the additional thrust required
to breakaway and continue the manoeuvre. Ideally, the aircraft should be kept moving
to ensure that breakaway power is not required.
3. An aircraft positioning onto stand with a single engine taxi, may make unpredictable
and unfamiliar thrust inputs to enable the aircraft to manoeuvre. There is the increased
potential for the power input to be much higher than normal.
26
2. Demonstrate Safety to CAA by Safety study
Example from PRG
The Airport has bays with fiveaircraft stands on each taxilane; just one aircraft allowedto be pushed at a time. Caused significant delaysin departure peaks.
Idea: to allow multi-push of twoaircraft to the same taxilaneat a time, with a distance of 100 m between them.
Question: Jet blast Safety?
27
Measuring of wind velocities and personal feeling in distancesof 90 m and 70 m behind medium sized aircraftcommencing taxi on breakaway power.
Result: Jetblast itself was not dangerous to ground personnel in case of clean surface.
Danger: dust, small stones, other FOD lifted by airflow.
Conclusion: multiple pushbacks separated by 100 m were approved by the CAA together with frequent and precise surface cleaning.
2. Demonstrate Safety to CAA cont’d
28
3. Publish & promote Minimum thrust on Apron
Identify Jetblast sensitive
places / taxi manoeuvers
Publish a request for
minimum thrust to pilots in AIP
Install information signs at
critical airside areas
if your airport is Jetblast sensitive,
think twice of single enginetaxi procedures. The engine runson higher powerand has larger jetblast contours Image of Airsight
29
4. Avoid non-standard breakaway manoeuvers
Case study 1: happened in Europe 2016
Jet blast incident after pilot of 737 got lostduring taxi and instructed to make non-standard 180° turn under 30% thrust on both engines, influenced working area, several light injuries.
Safety recommendationATC to announce all non-standard taxi manoeuvres to airport operations. Dispatcher to check the situation behindand decide if to continue on power / or to shut down and tow.
Case study 2: happened in Europe 2016
Jet blast incident of Apron bus side windowbeing broken and blown into the bus full ofpassengers. Caused by 747-8 taxiing nearbyon breakaway+ power; crew freshly retrainedfrom 747-400; But… new engines of 747-8 have slower response to input from pilots…
Safety recommendationwhen aircraft stops taxi at critical areas, shut-down of engines is mandatory and continuation is possible by towing only.
30
5. Keep ground personnel and pilots aware of risk
Example of best practice: Operational Safety Instruction of London Luton Airport
• Jet engine efflux and propeller or rotor wash is a potential hazard from the blast created by all aircraft
engines. It is common when applying breakaway power to get the aircraft moving that temporarily a
high or medium power setting is required.
• There may be an increase of thrust when an arriving aircraft is turning on to the stand centreline.
The risk is further increased if for any reason the aircraft stops, then applies the additional thrust
required to breakaway and continue the manoeuvre. Ideally, the aircraft should be kept moving to
ensure that breakaway power is not required.
• An aircraft positioning onto stand with an unserviceable engine, may make unpredictable and
unfamiliar thrust inputs to enable the aircraft to manoeuvre. There is the increased potential for the power
input to be much higher than normal.
• All employers shall induct staff, visitors and contractors, operating on the aprons, concerning the risks associated with aircraft rotors and propellers.
• Ground crews must ensure that the area immediately behind an aircraft, plus the zone immediately in front of the engine intakes, is clear before
giving clearance for engine start.
• Ground crews must notify pilots of any potential hazard that could be created by the starting of engines.
• As a matter of routine, aircraft are permitted to make a turn on some selected stands or parking areas where dimensions permit. In this event,
aircraft shall be marshalled into position.
• Consideration shall be given to other parked aircraft when positioning an aircraft for nose out and self manoeuvre departure.
• Aircraft are to keep all engines running (notwithstanding any fuel economy measures) in order to limit the need for high thrust levels. Ideally, the
aircraft should be kept moving to ensure that break-away power is not required. If this cannot be achieved within the confines of the aprons, an
aircraft may be asked to shut down engines and a push or tow initiated to manoeuvre the aircraft.
• Engines must not be run for test reasons when the aircraft is on stand, except as an approved ground idle engine run. Engines should be shut down
as soon as operationally practicable once the aircraft is parked. Aircraft anti-collision beacon(s) must remain on until the engines have run down.
• Pilots must use the minimum power necessary to get/keep the aircraft moving, particularly when in the Apron Area.
31
6. eTAXI
Case study 1: uni-fleet terminals, all eTAXI
Safety effect: very positiveall movements perfectly safe; ground staffand PAX protected even if they enter a zonebehind taxiing aircraft
Crossing of taxiways by GSE safe immediatelyafter aircraft passes
Safe conditions for Airport works nearby TWYs
Caution: cases of eTAXI inoperable / unusedmust be treated carefully, preferably by push/pull.
Case study 2: mixed-fleet terminals
Safety effect: partialprocedures set always for mixed fleetof aircraft, i.e. w.r.t. Jetblast.
eTAXI better protects ramp personnel thatwork behind aircraft
Safer conditions for Airport works nearbyTWYs
Severity of Jetblast incident remains the same, probability goes down.
Contact to Safety Management
Ing. Libor Kurzweil, Ph.D.
Director of Quality, Safety and Processes Management
Safety Manager
Prague Airport
K Letišti 6/1019
160 08 Praha 6
t +420 220 112 645
m +420 724 550 576