ce - adhitaadvisors.com witness - september 2019.p… · international consultants usa lokanath...
TRANSCRIPT
Group Business Head
Akshay Alagh | 98993 32111
International Consultants
USA
Lokanath MohapatraDr. Rajeev Mehta
UK
K. S. Sreekumar
Assistant Editors
Rajesh SrivastavaRahul Vaid*
Editor (Features)
Vineeta Jerath
Senior Manager – Brand Innovation
Bhupinder Kaur | 96541 55065Neelima Maheshwari | 88008 41600
Circulation & Subscription
Sunil S Chauhan | 98712 76447
Art & Creative
Vipin Rai
Admin. and Finance
Sunil Kumar
Head Office
Building No 426,2nd Floor, Ghitorni
MG Road, New Delhi - 110030
Registered Address
B1/6 Lower Ground FloorHauz khas, New Delhi - 110016
FoundingDirector
Shyam Grover
* Responsible for selection of news under PRB Act. Owned, Printed and Published by Shyam Grover and printed by JK Offset Graphics, B 278. Okhla, Industrial Area, Phase -1, New Delhi 110020and to be published at B1/6, Lower Ground Floor, Hauz Khas New Delhi 110016 by the Editor - Shyam Grover. The publishers regret that they cannot accept liability for errors & omissions containedin this publication, howsoever caused. The opinion & views contained in this publication are not necessarily those of the publisher. Readers are advised to seek specialist advice before acting onthe information contained in the publication which is provided for general use & may not be appropriate for the readers’ particular circumstances. The ownership of trade marks is acknowledged.No part of this publication or any part of the contents thereof may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form without the permission of the publishers in writing.
E X P E R T P A N E L
Prof. Madabhushi Sridhar Former Central InformationCommissioner, New Delhi
H. V. Ramadas Advocate, Karnataka High Court
Kumar V. Jahgirdar President-CRISP
Editor-in-Chief
PBA Srinivasan contents
A D V I S O R Y B O A R D
Dr. Justice AR Lakshmanan Former Chairman
Law Commission of India
Amarjit Singh Chandhiok Former Additional
Solicitor General of India
Justice R. S. Sodhi Retired Delhi High Court Judge
Dr. Lalit Bhasin President - Society of Indian Law Firms
Badrinath DurvasulaVice President & General Counsel,
HCC Ltd.
REGULARS
PAGE 08
The apex court has been going through a sea of developments on all
fronts. Right from administrative aspects to the headcount, there's a
lot happening up there. Are we moving in the right direction? Or is it
all nothing but a heavy baton ready to be passed over?
16 TRIBUTEArun Jaitley - His Role in Law, Law Making& Legal ProfessionDr. Lalit Bhasin, President - SILF & BAI, authors his tribute for the
legendary leader the nation had. It is indeed impossible to honour and
acknowledge the contribution of the 'GST Man' as they say not only in
terms of his portfolio but even to niche domains like law. Have an
interesting read through.
25 ACCOLADESManoj K Singh, Awarded with ‘SpecialRecognition for Service to the LegalProfession’ at Achiever’s Awards 2019Singh & Associates’ (S&A) Founding Partner, Manoj K Singh, was
recognized and awarded with ‘Special Recognition for Service to the
Legal Profession’ at Achiever’s Awards 2019 organized by Legal
League Consulting held at Taj Mansingh, New Delhi, India. He was
felicitated for his support for the legal profession. Read on to know
more.
29 SPECIALACC Supports In-house Professional Privilegein France, EuropeThe Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC), a global legal
association representing more than 45,000 in-house counsel employed
by over 10,000 organizations in 85 countries, has announced its
support of the recommendations of that report, specifically as they
regard in-house legal professional privilege. A detailed write up with
more on the development.
52 VINTAGE LANE63 COFFEE BREAK64 TAROT TALKS66 SNIPPETS68 BUZZ SQUARE72 JOBS ARENA74 CAPSULES77 EVENT CALENDAR78 TRIVIA
tête-à-tête
36MANJAREE CHOWDHARYExecutive Director and GeneralCounsel, Maruti Suzuki India
ASHU KANSALPartner, Adhita Advisors
expertspeak
KARAN KOHLIAssociate,Adhita Advisors
44
AMIT ANANDCorporate Counsel SpecialistAdvisor, NTT DATA
counselcorner
42
India's Judicial Brass: 34 Judges. Over 50,000 Cases.Do Numbers Matter?
CUTTING EDGE
Page 07_Layout 1 10/3/2019 5:40 PM Page 7
n the last decade or so, the
real estate companies have
seen some incredible highs,
followed by some
preposterous lows. Many real
estate players have experienced their fair
share of rags to riches story, while some have
seen the reverse. The real estate sector has
seen over the past couple of years falls of
giants of the industry with companies such as
Jaiprakash Associates and its affiliates, the
most famous being Jaiprakash infrastructure
Limited go under insolvency, the entire
Amrapali Group going copout and also facing
criminal sanctions not only from enforcement
agencies but also from the Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India, Cosmic Structures Limited
going into liquidation, Parsavnath Developers
going under insolvency among many many
others. While some of the companies have
fallen due to corruption/ diversion of funds
by the management of the company who was
supposed to be protecting the interest of the
company, while on the other hand some of
the companies have felt the brunt of change
of the government or change in the policies/
laws by the legislature.
Taking into context the curious case of
Jaypee Group, which in 2013-14 had assets
worth 10 lack crores rupees, spanning
businesses across cement industry to thermal
energy and most of all the real estate/
infrastructure industry. However, in the
aftermath of the nationwide slow down in the
real estate sector which saw huge declines in
the value of wealth in the sector, Jaypee
Group had to sell of 1/5th of its group assets
to bring down its debt which still after the
sale still stood at about 61,000 crores. At the
start of the 21st century Jaypee group
invested around 60,000 Crores in the real
estate, power and cement sector and saw
revenues of its companies such as Jaypee
Power ventures Limited and JP Associates
Limited grow at 26.92% & 32.08%
respectively, between 1999-2000 and 2014-15.
With the wind in its sail , Jaypee group
decided to bid to bring Formula One Grand
Prix racing in India. Along with the upcoming
Formula One Track, it also envisioned to build
44 | Lex WITNESS | September 2019 A Lex Witness Privileged Partners Initiative
expertspeak
C-124, Basement Floor, Lajpat
Nagar - I, New Delhi - 110024
T: 011- 45551603
W: www.adhitaadvisors.com
n Ashu Kansal & Karan Kohli
I
The Rise and Fall of Real
Estate Powerhouses -
Whom to Blame?“When you blame others, you give up your power to change.”
-Dr. Robert Anthony
Page 44-47_Layout 1 9/29/2019 12:57 PM Page 44
September 2019 | Lex WITNESS | 45A Lex Witness Privileged Partners Initiative
expertspeak
a cricket stadium with a total capacity of
around 1 lack people, a tennis stadium
and five townships on the Noida- Greater
Noida Expressway. However, due to
various reasons, its flagship Yamuna
Expressway Project, could not realize its
potential return due to reasons such as
power shortage in the state of Uttar
Pradesh, the lack of transmission
facilities which meant that even petrol
pumps could not be installed along the
expressway. Another key factor affecting
the Jaypee group was the change of the
state government from the Bahujan
Samaj Party under the aegis of which all
of the plans were cleared to the
Samajwadi Party who did not conquer
with the plans of the Jaypee Group. The
newly elected Samajwadi Party due to
reasons best known to them, did not
think of Formula One as a prudent
investment as a result of which the idea
of having a Grand Prix failed after its
second installment causing not only huge
losses to the Jaypee group but also to the
state exchequer as well due to the
potential taxes/ revenue the Formula One
Grand Prix would have brought to the
state of Uttar Pradesh. Combined with
the losses from their flagship
infrastructure projects and the loss from
the failed Formula One Project, Jaypee
Group is facing multifarious litigation all
over the country, however, the promoters
of the Jaypee Group are doing everything
in their power to reduce the debts of its
affiliates companies by selling of its
assets but what transpires of the various
companies of Jaypee Group is yet to be
seen. This is one instance in which
change in state legislation has led to the
downfall of the entire group.
On the other hand, there are instances
of widespread fraud, deceit,
Page 44-47_Layout 1 9/29/2019 12:57 PM Page 45
46 | Lex WITNESS | September 2019 A Lex Witness Privileged Partners Initiative
expertspeak
mismanagement, siphoning of the funds
by the management of the company who
was entrusted to protect the interest of
not only the company but also of its
investors such as in the case of Amrapali
Group. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India in Writ Petition (C) 940/ 2017 in
Bikram Chatterji vs. Union of India vide
order dated 23.07.2019 has vide the
detailed order relying upon the forensic
accounting report of the Amrapali Group
has found great illegality in the working
and functioning of the management of
the Amrapali Group with its statutory
auditors. This is a case in which despite
government sanctions and law in place,
still the management of the group has
been able to manipulate its books of
accounts to get additional funding from
financial institutions and also from
investors/ home buyers and the same
funds have been used by the management
of various companies forming the
Amrapali Group for their personal gains.
Then there is also a curious and
interesting case of Supertech Limited
which launched its most luxurious
project- SuperNova. However, soon after
the company has got all of the requisite
permissions from the state bodies and
had raised about 50% construction, the
Hon’ble National Green Tribunal (‘NGT’)
ordered that no construction is
permissible within 5 kms radius of the
Okhla Bird Sanctuary and the complete
construction of the project came to a
grinding halt. However, the company
filed an Appeal before the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India, which was
pleased to set-aside the order of the
Hon’ble NGT and Supertech was allowed
to carry on its construction. In this case
despite no fault of the builder/ developer
the complete project came to a standstill
and the builder was facing the wrath of
the investors/ homebuyer. However, the
Hon’ble Supreme Court came to the
rescue of the builder.
Like Jaypee, Amrapali, Supertech there
are a number of cases in the real estate
industry where due to one reason or
another the project of the builder/
developer fails to take off which may lead
to insolvency/ bankruptcy of the builder/
developer. However, one must see that it
is not always the builder/ developer who
is to blame. In cases such as Jaypee
wherein due to change in the state
government and the state laws, led to the
associate companies of Jaypee Group
making losses and eventually being
dragged into courts by investors, home
buyers, financial institutes and state
authorities and on the brink of
insolvency. In case of Supertech wherein
due to the order of Hon’ble NGT, the
project of the builder came to a halt and
the builder despite raising about half of
the total construction was ordered to
stop the construction which led to
various investors/ home buyers
approaching the Hon’ble NCDRC seeking
refund of their monies. In cases like this
without no fault of its own, the builder is
made to suffer losses owing no fault of its
own due to change in certain by-laws of
the state government. However, when one
sees cases like Amrapali in which the
management of the various affiliate
companies of the Amrapali Group were
hands in glove with its statutory auditors
then the same also causes prejudice in
the minds of the courts all over the
country as to the working and
functioning of all the builders.
What is being seen in the past couple
of years is that there are two types of
Home buyers. One, who has invested in
his future i.e, who has invested his hard
earned money to finally fulfill his dream
of owning his/ her own home. On the
other hand, there are the investors who
had parted away with their excess
money/ savings in hope that their money
will multiply manifold. However, due to
the slowdown in the economy coupled
with demonetization & introduction of
GST, these investors have seen their
investment tumble. This has resulted in
flooding of litigation especially, before
the Hon’ble NCDRC. The Hon’ble NCDRC
has in various cases directed the builder/
developer of such projects to refund the
amounts paid by the said homebuyers
who were actually the investor along with
interest for the delay in project coupled
with litigation cost and compensation
despite the fact that the builder has
completed the construction of the said
project/ unit. That the said act not only
leads to the builder incurring losses but
also makes the investor greedy in order
to extort money from the builder despite
actually having been offered possession
by the builder.
It would be worth to say that rather
than directing the builder to repay the
entire amount paid by the home buyer/
investor along with penal interest, cost
Page 44-47_Layout 1 9/29/2019 12:57 PM Page 46
September 2019 | Lex WITNESS | 47A Lex Witness Privileged Partners Initiative
expertspeak
and litigation expense on the project
where possession is offered, it should be
only some compensation that should be
awarded on delay in handing over the
project. If the builder is directed to repay
the entire amount paid by the home
buyer/ investor along with penal interest,
cost and litigation expense on the project
where possession is offered, would
otherwise lead to many - many more
builders going into insolvency and most
probably into liquidation which is
detrimental for the home buyers who have
invested their lifelong savings with the
Builders in the hope of owning their own
home. That the very dream is turning into
a nightmare as some of the investors are
approaching the Hon’ble NCDRC/ other
Courts/ Tribunals to get their money back
instead of giving the chance to builders to
complete the pending projects, thereby
fulfilling home buyers lifelong dream.
It is the need of the hour it should be
looked to resolve the matters qua
builders/ developers and try as much as
possible to resolve the concerns/
difficulties in order for the builder to
complete the entire project rather than
having them and the stakeholders to face
litigation in respect of one or some
particular home buyer/ investor. The
rights of all of the stakeholders should
trump the interest of one or some
particular stakeholders. The point which
needs consideration is that in case the
builder is sent to liquidation, will the
assets of the builder be able to cover the
demand against the builder in case of
failure to complete the project.
Ashu Kansal is a Partner having more
than thirteen years of experience. His
main areas of expertise are banking and
finance laws, securitization-related
matters, recovery of debts, suits, and
arbitration matters. Apart from drafting
various pleadings, he also advises/gives
opinions and strategies to clients on
various litigation matters in various
forums including the Supreme Court,
High Courts and various other Tribunals
across the Country. He has also briefed
top Senior Counsels across the country
for multinational clients.
Karan Kohli is an Associate with the
firm and a graduate of Guru Gobind
Singh Indraprastha University (IP
University). He has been handling
complaint cases under section 138 of
the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 &
commercial disputes. He regularly
appears before Hon’ble High Court of
Delhi, various district courts as well as
Tribunals and Forums.
w
Page 44-47_Layout 1 9/29/2019 12:57 PM Page 47