center for dark energy biosphere investigations c-debi major program nomination, discussion, and...
TRANSCRIPT
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere InvestigationsCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations
C-DEBI Major Program Nomination, Discussion, C-DEBI Major Program Nomination, Discussion, and Selection Processand Selection Process
C-DEBI NSF Annual ReviewC-DEBI NSF Annual Review14 January 201314 January 2013USC, Los Angeles CAUSC, Los Angeles CA
C-DEBI NSF Annual ReviewC-DEBI NSF Annual Review14 January 201314 January 2013USC, Los Angeles CAUSC, Los Angeles CA
In the beginning…In the beginning…• C-DEBI was first proposed to NSF as an RCN, and later as an STC, on the
basis of common themes and goals.
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
• At the time when the STC proposal was written, three Major Programs were on the horizon; all three were approved/scheduled when the STC was approved.
• The Major Programs have always been more than drilling, included: site survey, analytical work, follow-up expeditions (for JdF and NP).
• C-DEBI is intended to facilitate and contribute to development of additional research programs that could benefit from STC networking, collaboration, leveraging.
• Work on the three initial Major Programs will continue for some years to come, although primary drilling activities are complete; thus C-DEBI is looking for new opportunities for transformational discovery in subseafloor microbiology.
Major ProgramsMajor Programs
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
C-DEBI Major Programs are…
… a focus of STC activities
… featured on web and in print documents
… monitored regularly for progress, discussed at meetings/workshops
… often recipients of (modest) C-DEBI leveraging: small grants program, travel grants, graduate and post-doctoral fellowships
C-DEBI Major Programs are not…
… run by the STC (proponents lead)
… funded primarily by the STC (external funding must be secured)
… exclusively drilling or field based
… limited to deep sea research (although DS connection must be clear)
Major Program TiersMajor Program Tiers
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
Tier 1:
• poised to make significant contributions, achieve STC objectives
• significant funding has been secured for major operations/experiments
• can be the focus of a small-grants RFP, fellowships, workshops, travel
• entrains C-DEBI community members
Major Program TiersMajor Program Tiers
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
Tier 1:
• poised to make significant contributions, achieve STC objectives
• significant funding has been secured for major operations/experiments
• can be the focus of a small-grants RFP, fellowships
• entrains C-DEBI community members
Tier 2:
• potential to make major progress in 1–4 years
• external proposal(s) in review or will be submitted soon
• could be workshop, travel grants to support networking
Major Program TiersMajor Program Tiers
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
Tier 1:
• poised to make significant contributions, achieve STC objectives
• significant funding has been secured for major operations/experiments
• can be the focus of a small-grants RFP, fellowships
• entrains C-DEBI community members
Tier 2:
• potential to make major progress in 1–4 years
• external proposal(s) in review or will be submitted soon
• could be workshop, travel grants to support networking
Tier 3:
• planning horizon of 4+ years
• no active proposals, may be unclear what is best way forward
Major Program NominationsMajor Program Nominations
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
• Call was issued with background, FAQ, Data Sheet for submission of Major Program (MP) nominations
• Proponents asked to describe proposed MP, link to STC mission and goals, explain how objectives are to be achieved, identify most important C-DEBI themes and potential for collaboration, explain status and plans for upcoming work
• Data sheets posted online for review prior to AHM
• Proponents asked to provide a two-slide intro, poster for presentation and discussion
• AHM participants discussed proposed MPs during breakouts on second day of meeting
• Proponents asked to forward discussion record, revised Data Sheet (if desired), within 1 week after AHM
What was discussed in AHM breakout sessionsWhat was discussed in AHM breakout sessions
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
• Scientific background and context
• Primary STC objectives to be achieved
• History of work at the site/on the problem
• Research plans – what is funded, what proposals are planned, etc.
• Future opportunities and options (proposals, workshops, etc.)
• Working plan and rough schedule for progress
• Specific ways in which C-DEBI classification as a Major Program could be helpful
Major Program FAQ (abbreviated)Major Program FAQ (abbreviated)
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
• Why bother?
Networking, collaboration, advice, leveraging, acceleration of project pace. Resources are limited, but these are non-trivial contributions.
• Who decides?
ExCom is responsible for charting directions for the STC, making sure goals are met, resources are targeted.
• Who is on ExCom?
ExCom comprises initial NSF co-PIs for the STC (leaders of initial Major Programs) and the Deputy Director of the STC.
• Could ExCom change?
Much depends on what new leadership develops for Tier 1 Major Programs. STCs usually have modest (or no) turn-over in leadership at renewal. This remains possible for C-DEBI…
Major Program (MP) Submissions 2012Major Program (MP) Submissions 2012
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
• Ten MP Data Sheets submitted prior to All Hands Meeting in Fall 2012
• All proponent groups provided a poster for presentation at the AHM, and all were represented by the lead proponent or a representative
• Potential MPs were split between work with sediments and rock
Field Laboratory Modeling10 8 6
• All potential MPs have field components, and all also have laboratory and/or modeling components as well.
Sediments Rocks7 7
Major Program (MP) Submissions 2012Major Program (MP) Submissions 2012
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
• Proposed MPs addressed one to four of the main C-DEBI themes
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 31 3 6
• Following ExCom review, proposed MPs were categorized into Tiers
Activity Extent Limits of Life Evolution8 8 4 6
Major Program TiersMajor Program Tiers
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
Tier 1:
• poised to make significant contributions, achieve STC objectives
• significant funding has been secured for major operations/experiments
• can be the focus of a small-grants RFP, fellowships
• entrains C-DEBI community members
Tier 2:
• potential to make major progress in 1–4 years
• external proposal(s) in review or will be submitted soon
• could be workshop, travel grants to support networking
Tier 3:
• planning horizon of 4+ years
• no active proposals, may be unclear what is best way forward
New Major Programs: Next StepsNew Major Programs: Next Steps
Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF ReviewCenter for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI)2013 NSF Review2013 NSF Review
• Data sheets, posters and other information available at C-DEBI web site, along with Tier categorization
• Proponents encouraged to continue developing projects, alert ExCom when projects are scheduled, external funding is secured, opportunities are available for C-DEBI community members to participate – Tiers can change when projects are ready!
• RFPs will be written so as to encourage submission of proposals and applications for small grants, fellowships (postdoc, grad), travel funding, workshop support
• Proponents asked to provide periodic updates and announcements for the newsletter, presentation at meetings, etc.
• New Major Programs can be proposed, existing Major Programs can continue as long as they are productive, offer significant opportunities for transformative discovery