CD

955 r13'

95)

\

Centimeter1 2 3

Inches

,9>//

A11141

Association for Information and Image Management1100 Wayne Avenue. Suite 1100Silver Spring. Maryland 20910

301/587-8202

2

1.0

1.25

45 111112 8

130

1.4

0115o

2.2

11112.°

1.8

1.6

10 11

MANUFACTURED TO AIIM STANDARDS

BY APPLIED IMAGE, INC.

NO/.// -:"

:g0

,D0

.6

12 13 14 15 mm

S\rt.c,

CSIJ

"61' ,

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 351 253 SO 022 506

AUTHOR Bjerstedt, Ake, Ed.TITLE Peace/War Issues from a Psychological Perspective: A

Selective Bibliography, Nr. 113.INSTITUTION Lund Univ. (Sweden). Malmo School of Education.REPORT NO ISSN-0346-5039PUB DATE Apr 92NOTE 47p.

PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Conflict Resolution; Educational Objectives;

Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries;Individual Development; Individual Psychology;Nuclear Warfare; *Peace; *Psychological Patterns;*Psychological Studies; *Psychology; SkillDevelopment; Social Change; Social Science Research;War; World Affairs

IDENTIFIERS *Peace Education

ABSTRACTThis bibliography lists publications about the

psychological aspects of war and peace, and peace education ingeneral. Among the specific themes touched upon are psychologicalaspects of violent conflict resolution, psychological principlesunderlying effective responses to war threats, psychological effectsof war and peace, and the empowerment of individuals and groups tobecome more involved in and effective at peace-promoting activities.Most of the listed materials are in English, with some examples fromother languages also included. (M)

************************k****************************************

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.

***********************************************************************

SCOPE OF INTEREST NOTICE

The ERIC Facility has assignedthis document for processingto:

In our udgment, this documentis also of interest to the Clearinghouses noted to the right.indexing should reflect theirspecial points of view.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Educational Research and Improvement

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)

4nm document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it

O Minor changes have been made to improvereproduction quality

Points ot view or opinions staled in this docu-ment do not necessarily represent officialOERI position or policy

"r:

"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)."

PEACE/WAR ISSUESFROM A PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVEA Selective Bibliography

Editor:Ake Bjerstedt

Bjerstedt, A. (Ed.) Peace/war issues from a psychological perspective: Aselective bibliography. Pedagogisk dokumentation (Malmo, Sweden: Schoolof Education), No. 113, 1992

It is reasonable that you can be more effective and efficient as a peaceeducator, if you have a good knowledge of typical conceptions and otherpsychological prerequisites among the school pupils or other groups youwant to educate or influence. In addition, psychological components areimportant in most conflict and war situations.

In this report examples of publications containing studies or discussionrelated to psychological aspects of war, peace etc. and of peace educationare listed. Among the themes touched upon are psychological aspects ofviolent conflict resolution, psychological principles underlying effectiveresponses to war threats, psychological effects of war and peace, and theempowerment of individuals and groups to become more involved in andeffective at peace-promoting activities. In the 80s many studies dealt withreactions to the nuclear war threat. The major focus is on materials inEnglish from recent years, with some examples added from other languageareas. A few basic publications have been marked with an asterisk (*).

Keywords: Anxiety, attitudes, bibliography, concepts, enemy images,ethnocentrism, nationality images, nuclear war, peace, peace education,prejudice, responsibility, sex roles, stereotypes, war.

3

Abrams, H.L. Sources of human instability in the handling of nuclear weap-ons. In: Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences (Ed.). Themedical implications of nuclear war. Washington, DC: National AcademyPress, 1986. Pp. 490-528.

Adams, D. Psychology for peace activists: A new psychology for thegeneration who can abolish war. New Haven, CT: The Advocate Press,1987.

Adams, D. The Seville Statement of Violence and why it is important.Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1989, 29(3), 328-337.

Adler, K.P. Western European and American public opinion on peace,defence, and arms control in a cross-national perspective. InternationalSocial Science Journal, 1986, 38(4), 589-600.

Adorno, T.W. et al. The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper,1960.

Alger, C.F. Creating global visions for peace movements. In: Boulding, E.,Brigagao, C. & Clements, K. (Eds.) Peace culture and society. Boulder,CO: Westview Press, 1991. Pp. 243-260.

Allen, B.P. Defeating denial: Limited nuclear war and the small worldproblem. Journal of Social Psychology, 1990, 130(5), 693-695.

Allen, J. Nuclear threat as psychopathology: An interview with DavidIngleby. New Ideas in Psychology, 1989, 7(2), 205-216.

Allport, G.W. The role of expectancy. In: Cantril, H. (Ed.) Tensions thatcause wars. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1950. Pp. 43-48.

*Allport, G.W. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954.

Andrekus, N.J. The relationship between early ego strength and adolescentresponses to the threat of nuclear war. Berkeley, CA: California Schoolof Professional Psycholgy. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1990,50(7 -B), 3183-3184./

Andreyenkov, V., Robinson, J.P. & Popov, N. News media use and adoles-cents' information about nuclear issues: A Soviet-American comparison.Journal of Communication, 1989, 39(2), 95-104.

Ardila, R. The psychological impact of the nuclear threat on the ThirdWorld: The case of Colombia. International Journal of Mental Health,1986, 15, 162-171.

4

Arias, R., Soifer, R. & Wainer, A. Disavowal of the danger of nuclear war:Effect of cultural factors on mental attitudes. International Review ofPsycho-Analysis, 1990,17(1), 89-95.

Asprea, A.M. et al. The conceptualization of war in children. (Paper.)Tokyo: International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development,1987.

Austin, W.G. & Worchell, S. (Eds.) The social psychology of intergrouprelations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979.

Axelrod, L.J. & Newton, J.W. Preventing nuclear war: Beliefs and attitudesas predictors of disarmist and deterrentist behavior. Journal of AppliedSocial Psychology, 1991, 21(1), 29-40.

Axelrod, R. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.

Bachman, J.G. How American high school seniors view the military:1976-1982. Armed Forces and Society, 1983, 10, 86-104.

Bakan, D. Some philosophical propadeutics toward a psychology of war.In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war and peace: The image ofthe enemy. New York: Plenum Press, 1991. Pp. 41-58.

Bandura, A., Underwood, B. & Fromson, M.E. Disinhibition of aggressionthrough diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims.Journal of Research in Personality, 1975, 9, 253-269.

Bar-Tal, D. Israf,i-Palestinian conflict: A cognitive analysis. InternationalJournal of Intercultural Relations, 1990,14(1), 7-29.

Bauriedl, T. Bilder gegen die Angst: Der ProzeB der Auflosung vonFeindbildern. In: Vogt, W.R. (Ed.) Mut zum Frieden. Darmstadt:Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1990. Pp. 318-333.

Beardslee, W.R. Children's and adolescents' perceptions of the threat ofnuclear war: Implications of recent studies. In: The medical implicationsof nuclear war. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986. Pp.413-434. (a)

Beardslee, W.R. Perceptions of the threat of nuclear war: Research andprofessional implications. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 242-252. (b)

Beresin, A.R. Toy war games and the illusion of two-sided rhetoric. Play &Culture, 1989, 2(3), 218-224.

5

5

Berger Gold, B., Moon, S. & Van Hoorn, J. (Eds.) Growing up scared?The psychological effect of the nuclear threat on children. New York:Open Books, 1986.

Berggren, S. & Lauritzen, E. IngenjOrer och lakare mot karnvapen:Verksamhet, problem och mejligheter. Stockholm: Forskningsgruppenfor utveuklings- och miljofragor, 1986.

Bergstrom, A. & Holmborg, P. -O. Vad tanker och kanner barn och ung-dom infOr atombombshot och kapprustning? Stockholm: ForeningenSvenska lakare mot karnvapen, 1984.

Bernstein, J.S. Power and politics: The psychology of Soviet-Americanpartnership. Boston, MA: Shambala Publications, 1989.

Bernstein, M. Coping with serious threat: Conflict theory and the decisionto support alternatives to the nuclear arms race. New Haven, CT: YaleUniversity. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1986, 47(6-B), 2669./

Biggers, P.J. The development and analysis of normative instrumentswhich assess pre-adult cognitive and attitudinal orientations to selectedwar and peace concepts. (Ph. D.) Tallahassee, FL: Florida State Uni-versity, 1972. (Order No. 73-10, 321.)

Billesbolle, P. et al. Borns angst for krig med kernevaben. Ugeskrift forlager, 1986, /48, 731-734.

Bjerstedt, A. Reduction of "barrier tendencies" during experience ofinternational co-living: Psychological control studies of certain aspects inthe CISV socio-educational approach. Acta psychologica, 1958, 13,329-346.

Bjerstedt, A. A study of dyadic communication in international settings. In:Glimpses from the world of the school child. New York: Beacon House,1960. Pp. 87-127. (a)

Bjerstedt, A. "Ego-involved world-mindedness", nationality images, andmethods of research. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1960, 4, 185-192.(b)

Bjerstedt, A. Informational and non-informational determinants of na-tionality stereotypes. The Journal of Social Issues, 1962, 18, 24-29.

Bjerstedt, A. Explorations of enemy images using an associative technique.Educational and Psychological Interactions, No. 95, 1989.

6

Bjerstedt, A. Conceptions of the future and education for responsibility.Peace Education Reports, No. 4, 1992.

Bjerstedt, A. et al. Enemy images among university students in fourcountries: A cross-national exploration using an associative technique.Peace, Environment and Education, 1991, 2(3), 13-31.

Bjurwill, C. Framtidsforestallningar: Analys och tolkning av 900 ele-vers uppsatser och semantiska skattningar. (Studia psychologica etpaedagogica, 84.) Malmo: Liber, 1986.

Blackwell, P.L. & Gessner, J.C. Fear and trembling: An inquiry intoadolescent perceptions of living in the nuclear age. Youth and Society,1983, 15, 237-255.

Blight, J.G. Toward a policy-relevant psychology of avoiding nuclear war:Lessons for psychologists from the Cuban missile crisis. American Psy-chologist, 1987, 42(1), 12-29.

Blinnika, L.M. Personal, national and global image of the future in adult-hood,. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1987, 28(1), 35-41.

Blumberg, H.H. Attitude formation and international conflict. Interna-tional and Intercultural Communication Annual, 1990, 14, 56-74.

Blumberg, H.H. & French, C.C. (Eds.) Peace: Abstracts of the psycho-logical and behavioral literature 1967-1990. Washington, DC: AmericanPsychological Association, 1992.

Boehnke, K. et .al. Leben unter atomarer Bedrohung zur BedeutungAexistentieller Angste im Jugendalter. Gruppendynamik, 1988, 19, 429-

452.

Boenke, K. et al. How West German adolescents experience the nuclearthreat. Political Psychology, 1989, 10(3), 419-443.

Boenke, K., von Fromberg, E. & Macpherson, M.J. Makro-sozialer Stressim Jugendalter: Ergebnisse einer Wiederbefragung zu Kriegsangst undAngst vor Umweltzerstorung. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie undKinderpsychiatrie, 1991, 40(6), 204-213.

Boone, R. et al. Psychological effects of nuclear developments. LosAngeles: California State Psychological Association Task Force on Psy-chologists for Social Responsibility, 1983.

7

7

Borg, A., Hultman, E. & Waern, Y. Conflict resolution and social under-standing in six to twelve year old boys. Rep. Dep. Psychol., Univer.Stockholm, No. 481, 1976.

Borgenicht, L. Threat in the nuclear age: Children's responses to thenuclear arms debate. School Psychology International, 1985, 6, 187-193.

Bosowski, E.F. Two comparative studies of student views of the world.(Paper.) Upper Montclair, NJ: Middle States Division of the Asso-ciation of American Geographers, 1982.

Boughton, R.C. et al. Australian children and the threat of nuclear war.The Medical Journal of Australia, 1987, /47, 121-124.

Boulding, E. The child and nonviolent social change. In: Charny, I.W.(Ed.) Strategies against violence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1978.Pp. 68-99.

Boulding, E. Perspectives of women researchers on disarmament, nationalsecurity and world order. Women Studies International Quarterly, 1981,4, 27-40.

Boulding, E. Fran vision till verklighet. (Fredsarsdelegationens skriftserie,2.) Stockholm: Fredsarsdelegationen, 1986.

Boulding, E. Two cultures of religion as obstacles to peace. Zygon Journalof Religion and Science, 1986, 21(4), 501-518.

Boulding, E. Image and action in peace building. Journal of Social Issues,1988, 44(2), 17-37.

Boulding, K.E. National images and international systems. Journal of Con-flict Resolution, 1959, 3, 120-131.

Boulding, K.E. The nature and causes of national and military self-imagesin relation to peace and war. In: Kliot, N. & Waterman, S. (Eds.) Thepolitical geography of conflict and peace. London: Belhaven Press, 1991.Pp. 142-152.

Bradley, M. Psychological processes increasing the risks of accidentalnuclear war. In: Proceedings of the Congress of European Psychologistsfor Peace. Helsinki: The Finnish Psychological Society, 1987. Pp.155-167.

Brockett, C.D. A Kohlbergian approach to international distribution justice:A comparison of the shared humanity and interdependence perspectives.Political Psychology, 1986, 7(2), 349-367.

8

8

Brockner, J. & Rubin, J.Z. The social psychology of conflict escalation andentrapment. New York: Springer, 1985.

Brock-Utne, B. Feminist perspectives on peace and peace edacatioh.Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1989.

Brock-Utne, B. The raising of a peaceful boy. Peace, Environment andEducation, 1991, 2(1), 3-12.

Bronfenbrenner, U. The mirror-image in Soviet-American relations. In:White, R.K. (Ed.) Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war. NewYork: New York University Press, 1986. Pp. 71-81.

Bronstein, P.A. & Quina, K. (Eds.) Teaching a psychology of people:Resources for gender and sociocultural awareness. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association, 1988.

Brown, B.R. & Rubin, J.Z. The social psychology of bargaining and nego-tiation. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

Brown, S. The causes and prevention of war. New York: St. Martin'sPress, 1987.

Buban, M.E. et al. Children's fears of nuclear war: Group interventionstrategies. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1988, 13(3), 124-129.

Budzinski, M. et al. Ausliinder: Argumente gegen alltligliche Vorurteile.Tiibingen: Verein fur Friedenspadagogik, 1982.

Burn, S.M. & Oskamp, S. Ingroup biases and the U.S.-Soviet conflict.Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2), 73-89.

Burstermann, J.P. & Noar, G. Let's listen to our children and youth. In:Henderson, G. (Ed.) Education for peace. Washington, DC: ASCD, 1973.Pp. 63-88.

Buttner, C. Kriegsangst bei Kindern. Munchen: Kosel-Verlag, 1982.

Buttner, C. Children's war fantasies. Journal of Psychohistory, 1983, 10,491-510.

&tuner, C. Kinder und Krieg: Zum ptidagogischen Umgang mit Haft undFeindseligkeit. Mainz: Griinewald, 1991.

Caldicott, H. Missile envy: The arms race and nuclear war. New York:Morrow, 1984.

9

Cantor, L, Wilson, B.J. & Hoffner, C. Emotional responses to a televisednuclear holocaust film. Communication Research, 1986,13(2), 257-277.

Cantril, H. (Ed.) Tensions that cause wars. Urbana, IL: University ofIllinois Press, 1950.

Cantril, H., Buchanan, W. et al. How nations see each other. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press, 1953.

Carlsson-Paige, N. & Levin, D.E. Young children and war play. Educa-tional Leadership, 1987/88, 45(4), 80-84.

Cela, E.P. Psicologia e nonviolenza. Torino: Edizioni Gruppo Abele, 1991.

Chandler, M.A. Developing a measure of nuclear war anxiety: A factoranalytic study. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 1991, 16(2), 39-63.

Chelcea, S. & Dragomirescu, I. Peace in the value system of youngworkers. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales Serie de Psychologie,1988, 32(2), 113-117.

Children's fears of war: Hearing before the Select Committee on Children,Youth, and Families. Washington, DC: U.S. Government PrintingOffice, 1983.

Chilstrom, G.A. Psychological aspects of the nuclear arms race. Journal ofHumanistic Psychology, 1984, 24(3), 39-54.

Chilstrom, G.A. The nuclear arms threat: Psychosocial correlates of atti-tudes and behavioral response. San Diego, CA: California School ofProfessional Psychology. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1986,46(8-B), 2800./

Chimienti, G., Nasr, J.A. & Kalifeh, I. Children's reactions to war-related stress: Affective symtoms and behaviour problems. Social Psy-chiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1989, 24(6), 282-287.

Chivian, E. et al. Soviet children and the threat of nuclear war. AmericanJournal of Orthopsychiatry, 1985, 55, 484-502.

Chivian, E. et al. American and Soviet teenagers' concerns about nuclearwar and the future. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988, 319, 407-413.

Christiansen, B. Attitudes towards foreign affairs as a function of per-sonality. Oslo: Oslo University Press, 1959.

10

10

Christie, D.J. & Nelson, L. Student reactions to nuclear education. Bulletinof the Atomic Scientists, 1988, 44(6), 22-23.

Clark, A.W., Trahair, R.C. & Graetz, B.R. Social Darwinism: A determi-nant of nuclear arms policy and action. Human Relations, 1989, 42, 289-303.

Cohen, S.P. et al. Evolving intergroup techniques for conflict resolution:An Israeli-Palestinian pilot workshop. Journal of Social Issues, 1977,33(1), 165-189.

Conn, S.A. Protest and thrive: The relationship between global responsi-bility and personal empowerment. New England Journal of PublicPolicy, 1990, 6(1), 163-177.

Cooper, P. The development of the concept of war. Journal of PeaceResearch, 1965, 2, 1-16.

Crabb, P.B. & Rosnow, R.L. What is aggressive? Some contextual factorsin judging international behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 1988, 14(2),105-112.

Cretu, T. Peace and its most obvious meanings in preschool children'sdrawings. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales (Serie de Psychologie),1988, 32(1), 97-99.

Cross, T.P. & Saxe, L. The Day After: Report of a survey of effects ofviewing and beliefs about nuclear war. (Paper.) Toronto: AmericanPsychological Association, 1984.

Davidson, J.A. & Newman, M. Australian perceptions of the nuclear armsrace: A conflict of interests or a misunderstanding? Australian Psy-chologist, 1990, 25(1), 15-24.

Davies, R. Children and the threat of nuclear war. Lancaster, UK: Centrefor Peace Studies, S. Martin's College, 1984.

Davies, R. Hopes and fears: Children's attitudes to nuclear war. Lancaster,UK: Centre for Peace Studies, S. Martin's College, 1987.

Der-Karabetian, A. et al. Parental anti-nuclear activism and children'sresponse to the nuclear threat. (Paper.) Long Beach, CA: Western Psy-chological Association, 1987.

Deschamps, J.-C. & Brown, R. Superordinate goals and intergroup con-flict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1983, 22, 189-195.

11

11

Deutsch, K.W. Nationalism and its alternatives. New York: Knopf, 1969.

Deutsch, M. Socially relevant science: Reflections on some studies of inter-personal conflict. American Psychologist, 1969, 24,1076 -1092.

Deutsch, M. The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructiveprocesses. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973.

Deutsch, M. Conflict resolution: Theory and practice. Political Psychology,1983, 4, 431-453. (a)

Deutsch, M. The prevention of World War HI: A psychological perspec-tive. Political Psychology, 1983, 4(1), 3-31. (b)

Deutsch, M. Educating beyong hate. Peace, Environment and Education,1991, 3(4), 3-19.

Diamond, G. & Bachman, J. High school seniors and the nuclear threat,1975-1984. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 210-241.

Diamond, G. & Bachman, J.G. Nuclear despair and nuclear concern amongU.S. high school seniors and recent graduates. (Paper.) San Fransisco,CA: International Society of Political Psychology, 1987.

Dieckmann, H. Gedanken Ober den Begriff des "Feindbildes". AnalytischePsychologie, 1986,17(1), 25-37.

Dinklage, R.I. American and German children's perception of war andpeace: A photo-communication approach. Gainesville, FL: Universityof Florida, 1986.

Dinklage, R.I. & Ziller, R.C. Explicating cognitive conflict through photo-communication: The meaning of war and peace in Germany and theUnited States. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1989, 33, 309-317.

Doctor, R.M. et al. Self-reports of Soviet and American children on worryabout the threat of nuclear war. Political Psychology, 1988, 7, 13-23.

Doctor, R.M., Goldenring, J.M. & Powell, A. Adolescents' attitudes aboutnuclear war. Psychological Reports, 1987, 60, 599-614.

Doob, L.W. Patriotism and nationalism: Their psychological foundations.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964.

Druckman, D. (Ed.) Negotiations: Social psychological perspectives.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1977.

12

12

Druckman, D. The social psychology of arms control and reciprocation.Political Psychology, 1990, / / (3), 553-581.

Dyal, J.A. & Morris, P. Issue salience, nuclear anxiety, and mental health.(Paper.) Hamilton, Canada: Canadian Peace Research and EducationAssociation, 1987.

Dyal, J.A., Morris, P. & McKenzie-Mohr, D. Nuclear anxiety and issue-relevant behavior: Associations with mental health. Journal of SocialBehavior and Personality, 1990, 5(5), 243-262.

Early-Adams, P. et al. Coping in the nuclear age: The practitioner's role.Families in Society, 1990, 71(9), 558-562.

Easlea, B. Fathering the unthinkable: Masculinity, scientists and the nucleararms race. London: Pluto Press, 1983.

Eckhardt, W. Attitudes of Canadian peace groups. Journal of ConflictResolution, 1972,16, 341-352. (a)

Eckhardt, W. Crosscultural theories of war and aggression. InternationalJournal of Group Tensions, 1972, 2(3), 36-51. (b)

Eckhardt, W. War/Peace attitudes, events and values. Bulletin of PeaceProposals, 1983,14, 187-189.

Eckhardt, W. Making and breaking enemy images. Bulletin of PeaceProposals, 1991, 22(1), 87-95.

Eckhardt, W. & Alcock, N.Z. Ideology and personality in war/peace atti-tudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 1970, 81(1), 105-116.

Eckhardt, W. & Lentz, T.F. Factors of war/peace attitudes. Peace ResearchReviews, 1967, 1(5). /Rev. ed., 1971./

Ehrlich, P.R. et al. The cold and the dark: The world after nuclear war.New York: Norton, 1984.

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. Krieg and Frieden aus der Sicht der Verhaltens-forschung. (2. Aufl.) Miinchen: Piper, 1984.

Elsasser, G. Fdrsvarsvilja och framtidstro. Stockholm: The National Boardfor Psychological Defence, 1987.

Elworthy, S. The assumptions behind nuclear weapons decisions and ourrole in changing them. In: Nakarada, R. & Oberg, J. (Eds.) Survivingtogether. Lund: LUPRI, 1989. Pp. 19-29.

13

13

EngestrOm, Y. War in the imagination of Finnish school children. CurrentResearch on Peace and Violence (Tampere Peace Research Institute),1978, I , 91-103.

English, R.D. & Halperin, J.J. The other side: How Soviets and Americansperceive each other. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1987.

Ensel, F.-J. Richtige Angst und falsche Furcht: Psychologische Friedens-vorbereitung und der Beitrag der Plidagogik. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1984.

Erikson, E.H. Pseudospeciation in the nuclear age. Political Psychology,1985, 6, 213-217.

Escalona, S.K. Growing up with the threat of nuclear war. American Jour-nal of Orthopsychiatry, 1982, 52, 600-607.

Etzioni, A. Social-psychological aspects of international relations. In:Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.) The handbook of social psychology.(2nd ed.) Vol. 5. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969. Pp. 538-601.

Evan, W.M. The arms race and nuclear war. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1987.

Falk, A. & Selg, H. Die Begriffe "Krieg" und "Frieden" in der Vorstellungvon Kindern und Jugendlichen. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unter-richt, 1982, 29, 353-358.

Falk, R.A. & Lifton, R.J. Indefensible weapons: The political and psycho-logical case against militarism. New York: Basic Books, 1982.

Fenton, I. (Ed.) The psychology of nuclear conflict. London: Coventure,1986.

Fernald, M.C. Hope, connectedness, and action: Responses of adolescentsand young adults to the threat of nuclear war. Chapel Hill, NC: Uni-versity of North Carolina. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1986,46(11-B), 4010-4011.)

Feshbach, S. Psychology, human violence, and the search for peace: Issuesin science and human values. Journal of Social Issues, 1990, 46(1), 183-198.

Feshbach, S., Kandel, E. & Haist, F. Attitudes toward nuclear armamentpolicies: An example of social research in behalf of social advocacy.Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 107-126.

14

14

Finison, L.J. The Society for the Psychological Studies of Social Issues,peace action, and theories of conflict: 1936-1950. American Psycholo-gist, 1983, 38, 1250-1252.

Fischer, P.A. The effect of self-confrontation instruction on students' valuepriorities and attitude toward war and peace. New York: FordhamUniversity. /Dissertation Abstract International, 1984, 45(1-A), 123./

Fischer, R.J. Third party consultation as a method of intergroup conflictresolution: A review of studies. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1983, 27,301-334.

Fisher, R. & Ury, W. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement withoutgiving in. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.

Fiske, S.T. People's reactions to nuclear war: Implications for psychol-ogists. American Psychologist, 1987, 42, 207-217.

Fiske, S.T., Pratto, F. & Pavelchak, M.A. Citizens' images of nuclear war:Content and consequences. Journal of Social Issues, 1983, 39(1), 42-65.

Flohr, A.K. Feindbilder in der internationalen Politik: Ihre Entstehung andihre Funktion. Mtinster: Lit-Verlag, 1991.

Flordh, C., Westin, C. & Wilhelmson, L. Fredsforskning ur psykologisksynvinkel -- en litteraturdversikt. Stockholm: Pedagogiska institutionen,1967.

Fogg, R.W. Some effects of teaching adolescents some creative, peacefulapproaches for resolving international conflicts. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1973, 33(8-A),4054./

Fogg, R.W. Dealing with conflict: A repertoire of creative, peacefulapproaches. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1985, 29, 330-358.

Folberg, J. & Taylor, A. Mediation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1984.

Fox, D.L. & Schofield, J.W. Issue salience, perceived efficacy and per-ceived risk: A study of the origins of anti-nuclear war activity.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1929, 19(10), 805-827.

Frank, J.D. Sanity and survival in the nuclear age: Psychological aspects ofwar and peace. New York: Random House, 1982.

Frank, J.D. Nuclear arms and prenuclear leaders: Sociopsychological as-pects of the nuclear arms race. Political Psychology, 1983, 4, 393-408.

15

15

Frank, J.D. Prospects for world peace: Sociopsychological consideration.American Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1985, 5(2), 11-16.

Frank, J.D. Psychological responses to the threat of nuclear annihilation.International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 65-71.

Frank, J.D. The drive for power and conceptual inertia. Journal of theAmerican Academy of Psychoanalysis, 1989, 17, 347-357.

Frank, J.D. & Melville, A.Y. The image of the enemy and the process ofchange. In: Gromyko, A.A. & Hellman, M.E. (Eds.) Breakthrough:Emerging new thinking. New York: Walker, 1988. Pp. 199-208.

Frank, J.D. & Rivard, J.C. Antinuclear admirals: An interview study.Political Psychology, 1986, 7(1), 23-52.

Frankenhaeuser, M. Human fallibility and the risk of nuclear war by mis-take. In: Proceedings of the Congress of European Psychologists forPeace. Helsinki: The Finnish Psychological Society, 1987. Pp. 10-21.

Frankenhaeuser, M. To err is human: Nuclear war by mistake? In:Gromyko, A.A. & Hellman, M.E. (Eds.) Breakthrough: Emerging newthinking. New York: Walker, 1988. Pp. 53-60.

Fredsarbete under fOrintelsehot. (Special issue of:) Kritisk Psykologi, 1985,40(3-4).

Frei, D. Risks of unintentional nuclear war. Totowa, NJ: Allanheld,Osmun, 1983.

French, C.C. Psychological aspects of the nuclear arms threat: An annotatedbibliography. Journal of Preventive Psychiatry, 1984, 2, 247-273.

French, C.C. Psychological aspects of the nuclear arms threat: Annotatedbibliography update, I-IV. Psychological Reports, 1989, 65, 403-425,1099-1119, 1299-1322; 1990, 66, 71-93.

French, P.L. & van Hoorn, J. Half a nation saw nuclear war and nobodyblinked? Reassessment of the impact of The Day After in terms of a theo-retical chain of causality. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 276-297.

Frindte, W. Der Friede beginnt auch in den Kopfen: Padagogische and psy-chologische Aspekte der Friedensfahigkeit. In: Entmilitarisierung? Ber-lin: Brandenburgisches Verlagshaus, 1990. Pp. 251-268.

16

16

Fromm, E. The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York: Holt, Rine-hart & Winston, 1973.

Fuld, K. & Nevin, J.A. Why doesn't everyman work to prevent nuclearwar? A decision theory analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1988, /8(1), 59-65.

Galperin, M., Holt, R.R. & Howells, P. What Soviet emigre adolescentsthink about nuclear war. Political Psychology, 1988, 9, 1-12.

Galtung, J. Schooling, education, and the future. Didakometry & Socio-metry, 1982, 14(1-2).

Garbarino, J., Kostelny, K. & Dubrow, N. What children can tell us aboutliving in danger. American Psychologist, 1991, 46(4), 376-383.

Gilbert, G.M. (Ed.) Psychological approaches to intergroup and interna-tional understanding. Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1956.

Gilbert, R.K. The dynamics of inaction: Psychological factors inhibitingarms control activism. American Psychologist, 1988, 43, 755-764.

Gillies, P. A longitudinal study of the hopes and worries of adolescents.Journal of Adolescence, 1989,12(1), 69-81.

Glad, B. (Ed.) Psychological dimensions of war. London: Sage, 1990.

Goldberg, S. et al. Thinking about the threat of nuclear war: Relevance tomental health. American Journal of Ortopsychiatry, 1985, 55, 503-512.

Goldenring, J.M. & Doctor, R.M. California adolescents' concerns aboutthe threat of nuclear war. In: Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.) Impact of thethreat of nuclear war on children and adolescents. Boston, MA: IPPNW,1985. Pp. 112-133.

Goldenring, J.M. & Doctor, R.M. Teen-age worry about nuclear war:North American and European questionnaire studies. International Jour-nal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 72-92.

Goodman, L.A. et al. The threat of nuclear war and the nuclear arms race:Adolescent experience and perceptions. Political Psychology, 1983, 4,510-530.

Goodman, L.M. & Hoff, L.A. Omnicide: The nuclear dilemma. New York:Praeger, 1990.

1 7

17

Gordon, H. Buberian Learning Groups: Existentialist philosophy as anAriadne thread for education for peace. Teachers College Record, 1983,85(1), 73-87. (a)

Gordon, H. Existentialist writings and the enhancing of trust: A methoddeveloped in Buberian Learning Groups. Israel Social Science Research,1983, 1(1), 65-78. (b)

Gould, B.B., Moon, S. & van Hoorn, J. (Eds.) Growing up scared? Thepsychological effect of the nuclear threat on children. New York: OpenBooks, 1986.

Gould, J. Exploring youth's reaction to the threat of nuclear war. In:Gould, B.B., Moon, S. & van Hoorn, J. (Eds.) Growing up scared? NewYork: Open Books, 1986. Pp. 49-56.

Graudenz, I. & Randoll, D. Erleben der atomaren Bedrohung bei jungenErwachsenen: Uberpriifung eines als interkulturell angelegten Frage-bogens. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 1988, 35, 180-187.

Greenwald, D.S. & Zeitlin, S.J. No reason to talk about it: Familiesconfront the nuclear taboo. New York: Norton, 1987.

Grinspoon, L. (Ed.) The long darkness: Psychological and moral perspec-tives on nuclear winter. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.

Groznyko, A.A. & Hellman, M.E. (Eds.) Breakthrough: Emerging newthinking. New York: Walker & Moscow: Progress Publ., 1988.

Gugel, G. Auslander, Aussiedler, Obersiedler: Fremdenfeindlichkeit in derBundesrepublik Deutschland. Tubingen: Verein fur Friedenspadagogik,1.990.

Gugel, G. "Ich denke immer an diesen bloden Krieg": Was Sie fiber dieAngst ihrer Kinder vor Krieg und die Wirkung von Kriegs- und Ge-waltdarstellungen wissen sollten. Tiibingen: Verein fiir Friedenspada-gogik, 1991.

Gopfert, H. Auslandeifeindlichkeit durch Unterricht. DUsseldorf: Schwann,1985.

Haas, M.E. War and peace: The students' views. Journal ofResearch & De-velopment in Education, 1986,19(3), 84-89.

Haavelsrud, M. Views on war and peace among students in West Berlinpublic shools. Journal of Peace Research, 1970, 7, 99-120.

18

18

Haavelsrud, M. Ansichten von Kindem und Jugendlichen fiber Krieg undFrieden. Bildung und Wissenschaft, 1972, 25(3), 29-43.

Hamilton, D.L. & Rose, T.L. Illusory correlation and the maintenance ofstereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980,39, 832-845.

Hamilton, S.B. et al. In the eye of the beholder: Accounting for variabilityin attitudes and cognitive/affective reactions toward the threat of nuclearwar. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1987, 17, 927-952.

Hamilton, S.B. et al. Nuclear war as a source of adolescent worry: Rela-tionships with age, gender, trait emotionality, and drug use. Journal ofSocial Psychology, 1988, 128, 745-763.

Hamilton, S.B. et al. Relationships between the life values of U.S. collegestudents and their cognitive/affective responses to the threat of nuclearwar. Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 12(1), 55-68.

Hamilton, S.B., Chavez, E.L. & Keilin, W.G. Thoughts of Armageddon:The relationship between nuclear threat attitudes and cognitive/emotionalresponses. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 189-207.

Hamilton, S.B., Keilin, W.G. & Knox, T.A. Thinking about the unthink-able: The relationship between death anxiety and cognitive/emotionalresponses to the threat of nuclear war. Omega: Journal of Death andDying, 1987 - 88,18(1), 53-61.

Hamilton, S.B., Knox, T.A. & Keilin, W.G. The nuclear family: Cor-respondence in cognitive and affective reactions to the threat of nuclearwar among older adolescents and their parents. Journal of Youth &Adolescents, 1986,15, 133-145. (a)

Hamilton, S.B., Knox, T.A. & Keilin, W.G. Relationship between familysocioeconomic status and cognitive/affective responses to the threat ofnuclear war. Psychological Reports, 1986, 58, 247-250. (b)

Hare, A.P. & Naveh, D. Creative problem solving: Camp David Summit,1978. Small Group Behavior, 1985,16(2), 123-138.

Harman., W. How to think about peace (and feel empowered to do some-,t>

thing about it). Organization Development Journal, 1986, 4(4), 42-48.

Harris, I.M. The role of social conditioning in male violence. In: Boulding,E. et al. (Eds.) Peace culture and society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press,1991. Pp. 166-176.

19

19

Harris, R.A., Proskansky, H.M. & Roskin, E. Some attitudes of collegestudents concerning the hydrogen bomb. Journal of Psychology, 1956,42, 29-33.

Harvey, C.B., Howell, D. & Colthorpe, P. Canadian adolescents' concernsin the nuclear age. Canadian Counselor, 1985,19(2), 53-62.

Haste, H. Everybody's scared -- but life goes on: Coping, defence and actionin the face of nuclear threat. Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 12(1), 11-26.

Hawkes, G.W. What about the children? The threat of nuclear war and ourresponsibility to preserve this planet for future generations. Moretown,VT: Parents and Teachers for Social Responsibility, 1983.

Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley,1958.

Hesse, P. Children's and adolescents' fears of nuclear war: Is our sense ofthe future disappearing? International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 93-113.

Hesse, P. & Mack, J.E. The world is a dangerous place: Images of theenemy on children's television. Cambridge, MA: Center for Psycholog-ical Studies in the Nuclear Age, 1987.

Hesse, P. & Poklemba, D. The stranger with green feet and black piggytoes: Young children's conceptions of the enemy. Cambridge, MA:Center for Psychological Studies in the Nuclear Age, 1987.

Hesse, P. & The Project "Preparedness for Peace". Enemy images, develop-mental psychology, and peace education. Peace Education Miniprints,No. 29, 1992.

Hinde, R.A. Human aggression: Biological propensities and social forces.In: Smoker, P., Davies, R. & Munske, B. (Eds.) A reader in peacestudies. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990. Pp. 172-181.

Hofmann, C. (Ed.) Die Kinder, der Krieg and die Angst. Ravensburg:Ravensburger Verlag, 1991.

Hollin, C.R. Concern about the threat of nuclear war: Just another worry?Anxiety Research, 1991, 4(1), 51-60.

Holmberg, P.O. & Bergstrom, A. How Swedish teenagers think and feelconcerning the nuclear threat. In: Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.) Impact of thethreat of nuclear war on children and adolescents. Boston, MA: IPPNW,1985. Pp. 170-180.

20

20

Holsti, O.R. Perceptions of time, perceptions of alternatives, and patterns ofcommunication as factors in crisis decision-making. In: Peace ResearchSociety, Papers, Vol. III. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1965. Pp. 79-120.

Holsti, O.R. Crisis management. In: Glad, B. (Ed.) Psychological dimen-sions of war. London: Sage, 1990. Pp. 116-142.

Holsti, O.R., I -ody, R.A. & Worth, R.C. Measuring affect and action ininternational reaction models. In: Isard, W. & Wolpert, J. (Eds.) PeaceResearch Society, Papers, Vol. II. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1965. Pp. 170-190.

Holt, R.R. Can psychology meet Einstein's challenge? Political Psychology,1984, 5, 199-225.

Holt, R.R. On the relevance of psychology to preventing war. AmericanPsychologist, 1988, 43(4), 323-325.

Holt, R.R. College students definitions and images of enemies. Journal ofSocial Issues, 1989, 45(2), 33-50.

Holt, R.R. & Silverstein, B. (Eds.) The image of the enemy: U.S. views ofthe Soviet Union. (Special issue of): Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2).

van Hoorn, J., le Veck, P. & French, P. Transitions in the nuclear age: Lateadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 12(1),41-53.

Howell, S. & Willis, R. (Eds.) Societies at peace: Anthropological perspec-tives. New York: Routledge, 1989.

van Ijzendoom, M.H. Moral judgment and concern about nuclear war.Youth and Society, 1987,18(3), 282-301.

van Ijzendoom, M.H. The relation of moral judgment to authoritarianism,sexism, ethno-centrism and concern about nuclear war. Journal of MoralEducation, 1990,19(1), 38-47.

*Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. The medical implica-tions of nuclear war. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986.

Intriligator, M.D. & Brito, D.L. The potential contribution of psychologyto nuclear war issues. American Psychologist, 1988, 43, 318-321.

Jacobs, M.S. American psychology in the guest for nuclear peace. NewYork: Praeger, 1989.

21

21

Jacobsen, B. Krigen, freden og danskerne: En unders0gelse of voksnedanskeres epfattelse of internationale forhold. Copenhagen: Ejlers,1988.

Jahoda, G. & Harrison, S. Belfast children: Some effects of a conflict en-vironment. Irish Journal of Psychology, 1975, 3(1), 1-19.

Janis, I.L. Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.

Janis, I.L. Problems of international ',Isis management in the nuclear age.Journal of Social Issues, 1986, 42(2), 201-220.

Jensen, J.P. "Jeg er ikke racist, men ..." Orn foraomme og fjendebilleder.Psykologi, 1989, (21), 5-16.

Jensen, J.P., Jacobsen, B. & Keldorff, S. Contribution to a psychology forpeace for a consciousness and action against war. Tidskrift forNordisk Forening for Pedagogisk Forskning, 1982, 2(4), 34-45.

Jensen, M.P. Gender, sex roles, and attitudes toward war and nuclearweapons. Sex Roles, 1987, 17, 253-267.

Jervis, R. The logic of images in international relations. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 1970.

Jervis, R. Perception and misperc-ption in international politics. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1976.

Jervis, R., Lebow, R.N. & Stein, J.G. Psychology and deterrence.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnsor., F.P. Joining together. (2nd ed.) EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. Creative conflict. Edina, MN: InteractionBook Co., 1987.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. Cooperation and competition. Edina, MN:Interaction Book Co., 1989.

Johnson, R.N. et al. Attitudes concerning nuclear war in Finland and in theUnited States. iVgressive Behavior, 1986, 12, 155-166.

Jones, R.A. Self-fulfilling prophecies. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaurn, 1977.

Jones, V. Attitude of college students and their changes: A 37-year study.Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1970, 81(1), 3-80.

22

*Kahnert, M., Pitt, D. & Taipale, I. (Eds.) Children and war. Helsinki:Peace Union of Finland, 1983.

Kanani Hendijani, B. College of education students' attitudes towardselected international problems. (Ph.D.) Denton, TX: North Texas StateUniversity, 1983.

Kanofsky, S. The possibility of nuclear war: Appraisal, coping, andemotional response. Berkeley, CA: California School of ProfessionalPsychology. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1990, 50(8-B), 3759./

Kaplowitz, N. National se' rages, perception of enemies, and conflictstrategies: Psychopoliticai dimensions of international relations. PoliticalPsychology, 1990, 11(1), 39-82.

Kara, K. & Rehak, J. War and peace as conceived in various social groups.In: Ornauer, H. et al. (Eds.). Images of the world in the year 2000. TheHague: Mouton, 1976. PT?. 317-352.

Katz, D., Kelman, H.C. & Vassiliou, V. A comparative approach to thestudy of nationalism. In: Isard, W. & Wolpert, J. (Eds.) Peace ResearchSociety, Papers, Vol. XIV. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1970. Pp. 1-13.

Keen, S. Faces of the enemy: Reflections of the hostile imagination. NewYork: Harper, 1.986.

Keldorff, S. Hvo,for krig? Kommentarer till en ny kold krig. Aalborg,Denmark: Aalborg Universitetsforlag, 1986.

Keldorff, S. Holdninger till kaprustning og bekymring for atomkrig.Gistrup, Denmark: Edupax, 1989.

Keldorff, S. The image of the enemy from an external, military to aninternal, civilian enemy. Educational and Psychological Interactions, No.108, 1991.

Kelman, H.C. (Ed.) International behavior. New York: Holt, 1965.

Kelman, H.C. The role of the individual in international relations: Someconceptual and methodological considerations. Journal of InternationalAffairs, 1970, 24(1), 1-17.

Kelman, H.C. The problem-solving workshop in conflict resolution. In:Merritt, R.L. (Ed.) Communication in international politics. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press, 1972.

23

23

Kelman, H.C. The political psychology of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:How can we overcome the barriers to a negotiated solution? PoliticalPsychology, 1987, 8, 347-363.

Kelman, H.C. & Bloom, A. Assumptive frameworks in intenational politics.In: Knutson, J. (Ed.) Handbook of political psychology. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass, 1973.

*Kelman, H.C. & Hamilton, V.L. Crimes of obedience: Toward a socialpsychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale Uni-versity Press, 1989.

Kemp, G. The art of war. In: Smoker, P., Davies, R. & Munske, B. (Eds.)A reader in peace studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990. Pp. 182-190.

Kierulff, S. Belief in "Armageddon Theology" and willingness to risk nu-clear war. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1991, 30(1), 81-93.

Kirkland, F.R. Childhood, psychopathology, and the Gulf War. Journal ofPsychohistory, 1991, 19(1), 57-65.

Klineberg, 0. Tensions affecting international understanding: A survey ofresearch. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1950.

Klineberg, 0. The human dimension in international relations. New York:Holt, 1964.

Klineberg, 0. Public opinion and nuclear war. American Psychologist,1984, 39, 1245-1253.

Klineberg, 0. Children and nuclear war: A methodological note. Interna-tional Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15 , 253-260.

Klineberg, 0. The contributions of psychology to international understand-ing: Problems and possibilities. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychologyof war and peace: The image of the enemy. New York: Plenum Press,1991. Pp. 71-83.

Kloep, M. Prejudice and peace: Is the Swedish youth neutral in its attitudes?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1991, 32(1), 31-37.

Kramer, B.M. & Moyer, R.S. (Eds.) Nuclear psychology bibliography.Ann Arbor, MI: Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues,1990.

24

24

Kriesberg, L. The sociology of social conflict. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1973.

Kristiansen, K.K. & Rasmussen, J.R. (Eds.) Fjendebilleder og fremmedhad.Copenhagen: FN-forbundet, 1988.

Kull, S. Mind-sets of defense policy-makers. Psychohistory Review, 1986,14(3), 21-37.

Kull, S. Minds at war: Nuclear reality and the inner conflicts of Yensepolicymakers. New York: Basic Books, 1988.

L'Abate, A. Research as a tool for peace education. In: Bjerstedt, rte. (Ed.)Peace education: Glimpses from the EUPRA Conference in Firenze.Malmo, Sweden: School of Education, 1992. Pp. 5-14.

LaFarge, P. The Strangelove legacy: Children, parents, and teachers in Lenuclear age. New York: Harper, 1987.

Lambert, W.E. & Klineberg, 0. Children's views of foreign peoples. NewYork: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.

Landahl, P.-A. Om sanningen skall fram: Det psykologiska forsvaret iSverige under 35 dr. Stockholm: Styrelsen for psykologiskt forsvar,1989.

Lange, A. & Westin, C. Etnisk diskriminering och social identitet. Stock-holm: Liber, 1981.

Larsen, K.S. Attitudes toward nuclear disarmament and their correlates.Journal of Social Psychology, 1985, 125(1), 17-21.

Lasker, G. Race attitudes in children. New York: Holt, 1929. (Reprint:Greenwood Press, 1968.)

Laszlo, E. & Keys, D. (Eds.) Disarmament: The human factor. Oxford:Pergamon Press, 1981.

Lavik, N.J. Contributions from psychiatry on the peace-war issue. Bulletinof Peace Proposals, 1989, 20, 157-165.

Lebow, R.N. & Stein, J.G. Beyond deterrence. Journal of Social Issues,1987, 43(4), 5-71.

Lentz, T.F. Towards a science of peace. London: Halcyon Press, 1955.

25

25

Levine, H.B., Jacobs, D. & Rubin, L.J. (Eds.) Psychoanalysis and thenuclear threat: Clinical and theoretical studies. Hillsdale, NJ: AnalyticPress, 1988.

Le Vine, R.A. & Campbell, D.T. Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict,ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: Wiley, 1972.

Levinger, G. Beyond deterrence. (Special issue of:) Journal of SocialIssues, 1987, 43(4).

Leviton, D. (Ed.) Horrendous death and health: Toward action. New York:Hemisphere, 1991.

Levy, S.G. & Hefner, R. Multidimensional scaling of inteiaational atti-tudes. In: Isard, W. & Wolpert, J. (Eds.) Peace Research Society, Papers,Vol. I. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1964. Pp. 129-165.

Lewis, C., Goldberg, S. & Parker, K.R. Nuclear worries of Canadianyouth: Replication and extension. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,1989, 59(4), 520-527.

Lidin-Jansson, G. & Cederblom, S. (Eds.) Karnvapen i psykologisktperspektiv. Angered, Sweden: Svenska lakare mot kamvapen, 1982.

Lifton, R.J. Death in life: Survivors of Hiroshima. New York: RandomHouse, 1967.

Lifton, R.J. Beyond nuclear numbing. Teachers College Record, 1982,84, 15-29.

Lifton, R.J. A nuclear ethos: Ten psychological-ethical principles. Journalof Humanistic Psychology, 1985, 25(4), 39-40.

Lifton, R.J. The future of immortality and other essays for a nuclear age.New York: Basic Books, 1987. (a)

Lifton, R.J. Images of nuclear war and human destruction: Psychologicalperspectives. The McGill Journal of Education, 1987, 22, 203-218. (b)

Lifton, R.J. & Falk, R. Indefensible weapons: The political and psycholog-ical case against nuclearism. New York: Basic Books, 1982.

Lindell, E. Viildets laroplaner. Stockholm: Sveriges Lararforbund, 1984.

Lindell, E. & SalistrOm, M. VAldets varierande verkningar. Pedagogisk-psykologiska problem, Nr 425, 1983.

26

26

Lindholm, S. The image of the developing countries: An inquiry intoSwedish public opinion. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1971.

Lindholm, S. A thousand students on war, peace and peace education.(Paper, IPRA, Sussex, England, April 1986.) Stockholm: Department ofEducation, Stockholm University, 1986.

Lindstrom, P. Den hdrda linjen och den mjuka: En studie av slikerhets-politisk attitydbildning. Uppsala: Institutionen for freds- och konflikt-forskning, 1986.

Locatelli, M.G. & Holt, R.R. Antinuck 2r activism, psychic numbing, andmental health. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15 , 143-161.

Lowenstein, L.F. Education for world citizenship. Psychology: A QuarterlyJournal of Human Behavior, 1987, 24(3), 47-49.

Lowenstein, L.F. Realistic versus less realistic peace activism. New JerseyJournal of Professional Counseling, 1990, 53(1), 2-6.

Lyon, M.A. & Russo, T.J. Student concern and potential action regardingnuclear threat. (Paper.) Boston, MA: American Psychological Asso-ciation, 1990. (ED 322 464.)

Mack, J.E. The perception of U.S.-Soviet intentions and other psycho-logical dimensions of the nuclear arms race. American Journal of Ortho-psychiatry, 1982, 52, 590-600.

Mack, J.E. Resistances to knowing in the nuclear age. Harvard EducationalReview, 1984, 54, 260-270.

Mack, J.E. Nuclear weapons and the dark side of humankind. PoliticalPsychology, 1986, 7, 223-233.

Mack, J.E. The challenge of political self-responsibility in the nuclear age.Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1988, 28(3), 75-87.

Mack, J.E. & Redmont, J.C. On being a psychoanalyst in the nuclear age.Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1989, 29(3), 338-355.

Mack, J.E. & Snow, R. Psychological effects on children and adolescents.In: White, R.K. (Ed.) Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war.New York: NYU Press, 1986. Pp. 16-33.

Macy, J.R. Despair and personal power in the nuclear age. Philadelphia,PA: New Society Publishers, 1983.

27

27

Mapes, M.C. The National Peace Academy: Conflict management and con-flict resolution. American Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1987, 7(3), 135-140.

Marcattilio, A.J. & Nevin, J.A. The threat of nuclear war: Some responses.Behavior Analyst, 1986, 9(1), 61-70.

Markey, E.J. The politics of arms control: A matter of perception. Ameri-can Psychologist, 1985, 40, 557-560.

Marullo, S. Gender differences in peace movement participation. (Paper.)Baltimore, MD: Eastern Sociological Society, 1989.

Mathisen, P. Barns og unges framtidsforestellinger Et pedagogisk an-liggende. Oslo: Pedagogisk Forskningsinstitutt, 1990.

De Mause, L. A proposal for a nuclear tensions monitoring center. Specialissue: The psychogenic theory of history: A critique. Journal of Psycho-history, 1985, 13(2), 197-206.

Mayton, D.M. Spontaneous concern about nuclear war by college students.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1986, 7(3), 185-193. (a)

Mayton, D.M. The structure of attitudes to doomsday issues: A replica-tion. Australian Psychologist, 1986, 21(3), 395-403. (b)

Mayton, D.M. Values and nuclear freeze attitudes: Some value-attitude re-lationships in adolescents. Contemporary Social Psychology, 1987, 12,111-114.

Mayton, D.M. Measurement of nuclear war attitudes: Methods and con-cerns. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1988, 9, 241-263.

Mayton, D.M. & Delamater, M.C. Indirect assessment of concern aboutnuclear war. Psychological Reports, 1986, 59, 709-710.

McCarthy, S.V. Elderhostelers and college women coping with nuclearthreat: A comparative study of thoughts and actions about nuclear war.Psychological Reports, 1988, 62(2), 619-625. (a)

McCarthy, S.V. Elderhostelers' coping with nuclear threat: Peacemakingand perception of lifeworld. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1988, 66(1),264-266. (b)

McClenney, L. & Neiss, R. Psychological responses to the threat of nuclearwar. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1989, 19(15, Pt 1), 1239-1267.

28

28

McGinnis, J. & McGinnis, K. Parenting for peace. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis,1981.

McGraw, K.M. & Tyler, T.R. The threat of nuclear war and psychologicalwell-being. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 172-188.

McKenzie-Mohr, D.P. Perceptions of threat, collective control, tacticalefficacy and competing threats as determinants of pro-disarmamentbehavior. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo, Canada. /DissertationAbstracts International, 1989, 49(12-B, Pt 1), 5571./

Mellville, A. How we view each other: The enemy image and new politicalthinking. Moscow: Novosti Press, 1988.

Melnikova, 0. & Shirkov, Y. Image of the enemy: A description of theimage of the enemy among the Soviet people by an associative technique.Educational and Psychological Interactions, No. 102, 1990.

Mende, K.D. & Rathenow, H.-F. (Eds.) Vorurteile and Feindbilder im Ost-West-Verhiiltnis. Berlin: Technische Universitat, 1990.

Mercer, G. Adolescent views of war and peace Another look. Journal ofPeace Research, 1974, 11, 247-249.

Milgram, S. Obedience to authority. New York: Harper, 1974.

Miller, M.S. Peace through parenting: Some antecedents of militarism inmen. (Ph.D.) The Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities,1987. (Order No. ZA 8725103.)

Mitrofan, I. & Mitrofan, N. Peace and the human condition in the view ofRomanian students. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales (Serie de Psy-chologie), 1988, 32(1), 87-93.

Modell, J. & Haggerty, T. The social impact of war. Annual Review ofSociology, 1991, 17, 205-224.

Morawski, J.G. & Goldstein, S.E. Psychology and nuclear war: A chapterin our legacy of social responsibility. American Psychologist, 1985, 40,276-284.

Moyer, R.S. Teaching psychology courses about the nuclear arms race.Contemporary Social Psychology, 1987,12(3), 101-110.

Mueller, J. Changing attitudes towards war: The impact of the First WorldWar. British Journal of Political Science, 1991, 21(1), 1-28.

29

29

Murphy, G. (Ed.) Human nature and enduring peace. Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin, 1945.

Nelson, A. Psychological equivalence: Awareness and response-ability inour nuclear age. American Psychologist, 1985, 40, 549-556.

Nelson, L. & Beardsley, G.L. Toward an interdisciplinary model ofbarriers to nuclear arms control. Social Science Journal, 1987, 24(4),375-388.

Nerman, T. Folkhatet. Stockholm: Svenska Andelsforlaget, 1918.

Nevin, J.A. Behavior analysis, the nuclear arms race, and the peace move-ment. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 27-44.

Newcomb, M.D. Nuclear attitudes and reactions: Associations with de-pression, drug use, quality of life. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 1986, 50, 906-920.

Newcomb, M.D. Background, personality, and behavioral correlates ofnuclear anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 1988, 9, 379-389. (a)

Newcomb, M.D. Nuclear anxiety and psychosocial functioning amongyoung adults. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1988, 9, 107-134.(b)

Newcomb, M.D. Assessment of nuclear anxiety among American students:Stability over time, secular trends, and emotional correlates. Journal ofSocial Psychology, 1989, 129, 591-608.

Newman, D. Overcoming the psychological barrier: The role of images inwar and peace. In: Kliot, N. & Waterman, S. (Eds.) The political geog-raphy of conflict and peace. London: Belhaven Press, 1991. Pp. 201-216.

Nielsen, G.S. (Ed.) Psychology and international affairs. Can we contrib-ute? Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1962.

Nilsson, N. Krig dr ingen lek. Stockholm: Tiden, 1981.

Nilsson, N. Do children need to be introduced to violence? The use of toysof war and violence. (Paper.) Hong Kong: International Conference onEarly Education and Development, 1989.

Nolting, H.P. Lernschritte zur Gewaltlosigkeit: Ergebnisse psychologischerFriedensforschung. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1981.

30

30

Nord land, E. Nar barn leker krig. Barn, 1984, (3), 24-31, 64.

Northrup, T.A. Women's and men's conceptions of war, peace andsecurity. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University. /Dissertation AbstractsInternational, 1988, 49(2-13), 569-570./

Oliner, S.P. Altruism: Antidote to human conflict. Humboldt Journal ofSocial Relations, 1991, 16(2), 1-37.

Oliver, P. Reactions of young New Zealanders to nuclear issues. Com-munity Mental Health in New Zealand, 1989, 4(2), 23-40.

Oliver, P. Nuclear freedom and students' sense of efficacy about prevfmtionof nuclear war. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1990, 60(4), 611-621.

O'Malley, E.M. Global awareness of administrators in higher education inthe State of Oregon. (Ed.D.) Portland, OR: Portland State University,1983.

Omauer, H., Wiberg, H., Sicinski, A. & Galtung, J. (Eds.) Images of theworld in the year 2000: A comparative ten nation study. The Hague:Mouton, 1976.

van Omum, W. & Wicker van Omum, M. Talking with children about nu-clear war. New York: Continuum Press, 1984.

*Osgood, C.E. An alternative to war and surrender. Urbana, IL: Uni-versity of Illinois Press, 1962.

Oskamp, S. (Ed.) International conflict and national public policy issues.Applied Social Psychology Annual. Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage,1985.

Oskamp, S. et al. The media and nuclear war: Fallout from TV's The DayAfter. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 127-158.

Ostermann, A. Vorurteile haben doch nur die anderen. In: CallieB, J. &Lob, R.E. (Eds.) Handbuch Praxis der Umwelt- und Friedenserziehung.Band 3. Dusseldorf: Schwalm, 1988. Pp. 457-466.

Ostermann, A. & Nicklas, H. Vorurteile und Feindbilder. (3. Aufl.) Wein-heim: Beltz, 1984.

Palmer, E.L. The flower and the mushroom: Young children encounter"The Day After". Marriage and Family Review, 1986, 10(2), 51-58.

31

31

Papadatou, D. & Papadatos, C. (Eds.) Children and death. New York:Hemisphere, 1991.

Parknas, L. Viigen till forandring: En handbok for Overlevnadsarbete.Goteborg: Pax forlag, 1990.

Pasierbsky, F. Krieg und Frieden in der Sprache: Eine sprachwissen-schaftliche Textanalyse. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer, 1983.

Pavelchak, M.A. & Schoefield, J.W. Fallout from "The Day After":Content-relevant effects. (Paper.) Toronto: American PsychologicalAssociation, 1984.

Pear, T.H. (Ed.) Psychological factors of peace and war. New York:Philosophical Library, 1950.

Peck, C. Identifying and treating maladaptive responses to the nuclearthreat. Behavior Analysis & Social Action, 1989, 7(1-2), 16-22.

Peck, C. Conflict management and the prevention of war. Australian Psy-chologist, 1990, 25(1), 2-14.

Pe lton, L.H. The psychology of nonviolence. New York: Pergamon Press,1974.

Perlman, M. Memory, soul and the place of Hiroshima. PsychohistoryReview, 1987, 16(1), 67-97.

Petersen, C.C., Lawrence, J.A. & Dawes, I. The relationship of gender, sexrole, and law-and-order attitudes to nuclear opinions. Sex Roles, 1990.22(5-6), 283-292.

Pettigrew, T.F. The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cog-nitive analysis of prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,1979, 5, 461-476.

Pfltiger P.M. (Ed.) Freund- und Feindbilder: Begegnung mit dem Osten.Olten, Switzerland: Walter-Verlag, 1986.

Phillips, N.E. Militarism and grass-roots involvement in the military-industrial complex. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1973, 17, 625-655.

Piaget, J. & Weil, M.A. Development in children of the idea of homelandand of relations with other countries. International Social ScienceBulletin, 1951, 3(3), 561-578.

32

32

Pikas, A. Set bekampar vi mobbning i skolan. Uppsala: AMA dataservice,1987.

Pike, L. et al. Other nations, other people: A survey of student interests,knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions. Washington, DC: US Govern-ment Printing Office, 1979.

Pilisuk, M. Experimenting with the arms race. Journal of Conflict Resolu-tion, 1984, 28, 296-315.

Pious, S. Disarmament, arms control, and peace in the nuclear age: Politi-cal objectives and relevant research. Journal of Social Issues, 1988,44(2), 133-154.

Pious, S. & Zimbardo, P.G. The looking glass war. Psychology Today,1984, 18(11), 48-59.

Polyson, J.A., Stein, D.M. & Sholley, B.K. A survey of psychologists'nuclear war attitudes. Political Psychology, 1988, 9, 25-39.

Pool, I.D. Symbols of internationalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford UniversityPress, 1951.

Poole, M.E. & Cooney, G.H. Orientations to the future: A comparison ofadolescents in Australia and Singapore. Journal of Youth and Ado les-cence, 1987, 16(2), 129-151.

Prior, M. Australian adolescents' views of the nuclear threat. Interdis-ciplinary Peace Research, 1989, 1(1), 61-85.

Proceedings of the Congress of European Psychologists for Peace, Helsinki,August 8-10, 1986. Helsinki: The Finnish Psychological Society, 1987.'

Pruitt, D.G. & Rubin, J.Z. Social conflict: Escalation, statement and settle-ment. New York: Random House, 1986.

Psychological aspects of nuclear development. Washington, DC: AmericanPsychiatric Association, 1982.

Punamaki, R.-L. Childhood under conflict: The attitudes and emotionallife of Israeli and Palestinian children. Tampere: Tampere Peace Re-search Institute, 1987.

Rabow, J., Hernandez, A.C.R. & Newcomb, M.D. Nuclear fears and con-cerils among college students: A cross-national study of attitudes. Poli-tical Psychology, 1990, 11(4), 681-698.

33

33

Ramirez, J.M., Hinde, R.A. & Groebel, J. (Eds.) Essays on violence.Sevilla, Spain: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, 1987.

Raundalen, M. & Finnoy, O.J. Children's and teen-agers' views of thefuture. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 114-125. (a)

Raundalen, M. & Finn0y, O.J. Scandinavian youth view the future. In: Themedical implications of nuclear war. Washington, DC: National AcademyPress, 1986. Pp. 435-443..(b)

Raundalen, M. & Raundalen, T.S. Barn i atomalderen. Oslo: J.W.Cappelen, 1984.

Readiness for peace Readiness for the future: Reports and Miniprintsfrom the Malmo School of Education. Reprints and Miniprints (Malmo,Sweden: School of Education), No. 743, 1992.

Reardon, B.A. Sexism and the war system. New York: Teachers CollegePress, 1985.

Reifel, S. Children living with the nuclear threat. Young Children, 1984,39, 74-80.

Richter, H.E. Alle redeten vom Frieden. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1981.

Richter, H.E. Zur Psychologie des Friedens. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1982.

Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war and peace: The image of theenemy. New York: Plenum, 1991.

Ris, H.W. The psychological effect of the threat of nuclear war on childrenand adolescents: A report of The Third International Congress of Inter-national Physicians to Prevent Nuclear War. International Journal ofAdolescent Medicine & Health, 1985,1, 391-395.

de Rivera, J.H. The psychological dimension of foreign policy. Columbus,OH: Merrill, 1968.

de Rivera, J. Facing nuclear weapons. American Behavioral Scientist, 1984,27, 739-756.

de Rivera, J. & Laird, J. Peace fair or warfare: Educating the community.Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 59-80.

Robinson, J.P., Chivian, E. & Tudge, J. News media use and adolescents'attitudes about nuclear issues: An American-Soviet comparison. Journalof Communication, 1989, 39(2), 105-113.

34

34

Rogers, C.R. A psychologist looks at nuclear war: Its threat, its possibleprevention. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1982, 22, 9-20.

Rogers, C.R. Steps toward world peace, 1948-1986: Tension reduction intheory and practice. Counseling and Values, 1987, 32(1), 12-16.

Rogers, C.R. & Malcolm, D. The potential contribution of the behavioralscientist to world peace. Counseling and Values, 1987, 32(1), 10-11.

Rogers, C. & Ryback, D. One alternative to nuclear planetary suicide.Counseling Psychologist, 1984,12(2), 3-12.

Roscoe, B. Social issues as social problems: Adolescents' perceptions.Adolescence, 1985, 20, 377-383.

Roscoe, B. & Goodwin, M.P. Adolescents' knowledge of nuclear issues andthe effects of nuclear war. Adolescence, 1987, 22, 803-812.

Rosell, L. Barns forestallningar om krig och fred. Lund: Sociologiska insti-tutionen, 1968. (a)

Rosell, L. Children's views of war and peace. Journal of Peace Research,1968, 5, 268-276. (b)

Rosenblatt, R. Kinder des Krieges: Gespriiche mit Kindern aus Nordirland,Israel, Libanon, Kambodscha and Vietnam. Hamburg: Kabel Verlag,1984.

Rounds, J.B. Erdahl, P. Nuclear locus of control scales. Educational andPsychological Measurement, 1988, 48, 387-395.

Rowe, D. Living with the bomb: Can we live without enemies? London:Routledge, 1985.

Roy, P.J. An examination of psychological variables related to nuclearattitudes and nuclear activism. (Ph.D.) Berkeley, CA: California Schoolof Professional Psychology, 1985.

Rubenfeld, F. The peace manual: A guide to personal-political integration.Berkeley, CA: Lion-Lamb Press, 1986.

Rubin, J.Z. Experimental research on third-party interaction in conflict:Toward some generalizations. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87, 379-1191.

Rudmin, F.W. Seventeen early peace psychologists. Journal of HumanisticPsychology, 1991, 3 / (2), 12-43.

35

35

Russo, T.J. & Lyon, M.A. Predictors of college students' levels of knowl-edge and concern about nuclear war. Journal of Applied Social Psy-chology, 1990, 20, 739-750.

Sande, G.N. et al. Value-guided attributions: Maintaining the moral self-image and the diabolical enemy-image. Journal of Social Issues, 1989,45(2), 91-118.

Sandman, P.M. & Valenti, J.M. Scared stiff or scared into action. Bulletinof the Atomic Scientists, 1986, 42(1), 12-16.

Scheer, R. With enough shovels: Reagan, Bush, and nuclear war. NewYork: Random House, 1982.

Schmidhauser, U. Vorurteile, Stereotype, Feindbilder. In: CallieB, J. &Lob, R.E. (Eds.) Praxis der Umwelt- and Friedenserziehung. Band 1.Dusseldorf: Schwann, 1987. Pp. 358-363.

Schwebel, M. (Ed.) Behavioral science and human survival. Palo Alto, CA:Science and Behavior Books, 1965.

Schwebel, M. Effects of the nuclear war threat on children and teenagers.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1982, 52, 608-618.

Schwebel, M. (Ed.) Mental health implications of life in the nuclear age.Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1986. /Special issue of: International Journalof Mental Health, /5(1-3)./

Schwebel, M. The construction of reality in the nuclear age. Political Psy-chology, 1990, 11(3), 521-552.

Segal, H. Silence is the real crime. International Review of Psycho-Analy-sis, 1987,14(1), 3-12.

Seligman, M.E.P. Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. SanFrancisco: Freeman, 1975.

Senghaas-Knobloch, E. Von Feindbildern zur kooperativen Bearbeitungvon gemeinsamen Zivilisationsaufgaben in Europa. Bern: Arbeitspapiereder Schweizerischen Friedensstiftung, 1990.

Senghaas-Knobloch, E. Social learning and conflict resolution in a changingEurope. In: Boulding, E. (Ed.) New agendas for peace research. London:Rienner, 1992. Pp. 13-21.

Sheffet, A.M. et al. Adolescents and nuclear arms issues. Social Science andMedicine, 1988, 27, 995-998.

36

36

Sheridan, D.B. Ecofeminist strategies of peacemaking. (Ph.D.) Eugene,OR: University of Oregon, 1990. (Order No. 9025497.)

Sherif, M. Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. In:Gilbert, G.M. (Ed.) Psychological approaches to intergroup andinternational understanding. Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1956.Pp. 6-12.

Sherif, M. et al. Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Caveexperiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange, 1961.

Sherif, M. & Sherif, C. In common predicament: Social psychology ofinter-group conflict and cooperation, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin,1966.

Shohat, L. Israeli children's conceptualization of war and peace: An ex-ploratory cognitive-developmental study. New York: ColumbiaUniversity. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1988, 48(8-B), 2478./

Showers, D.E. The effect of persuasion on nuclear attitudes of secondaryschool students. (Paper.) Washington, DC: National Association forResearch in Science Teaching, 1987.

Silverman, J.M. & Kumka, D.S. Gender differences in attitudes towardnuclear war and disarmament. Sex Roles, 1987, 16, 189-203.

Silverstein, B. Toward a science of propaganda. Political Psychology, 1987,8, 49-60.

Silverstein, B. Enemy images: The psychology of U.S. attitudes and cog-nitions regarding the Soviet Union. American Psychologist, 1989,44, 903-913.

Silverstein, B. & Flamenbaum, C. Biases in the perception and cognition ofthe action of enemies. Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2), 51-72.

Silverstein, B. & Holt, R.R. Research on enemy images: Present status andfuture prospects. Journal of Social issues, 1989, 45(2), 159-175.

Simmons, J.R. Sources of political socialization to international conflict:Influences of the mass media, family, peer group, school and religion onadolescents' orientations toward war and peace. (Ph.D.) Seattle, WA:University of Washington, 1974.

Skinner, B.F. Toward the cause of peace: What can psychology contribute?In: Oskamp, S. (Ed.) International conflict and national public policyissues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985. Pp. 21-26.

37

37

Slee, P.T. & Cross, D.G. Living in the nuclear age: An Australian study ofchildren's and adolescents' fears. Child Psychiatry and Human Develop-ment, 1989, 19(4), 270-278.

Smith, C.G. (Ed.) Conflict resolution: Contributions of the behavioralsciences. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1971.

Smith, M.B. War, peace and psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 1986,42(4), 23-38.

Snyder, R.C., Bruck, H.W. & Sapin, B. Decision-making as an approach tothe study of international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press,1954.

Solantaus, T. The global world: A domain for development in adolescence?Journal of Adolescence, 1989,12(1), 27-40.

Solantaus, T. Young people and the threat of nuclear war: 'Out there is aworld I belong to'. A literature review. (Medicine and War, Vol. 7,Suppl. 1.) London: Cass, 1991.

Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.) Impact of the threat of nuclear war on childrenand adolescents. Boston, MA: International Physicians for the Preventionof Nuclear War, 1985.

Solantaus, T. & Rimpela, M. Mental health and the threat of nuclear war.International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 261-275.

Solantaus, T., Rimpela, M. & Rahkonen, 0. Social epidemiology of theexperience of 1-reat of war among Finnish youth. Social Science andMedicine, 1985, 21, 145-151.

Solantaus, T., Rimpela, M. & Taipale, V. The threat of war in the minds of12- to 18-year-olds in Finland. Lancet, April 7, 1984 (No. 8380),784-785.

Solomon, L.N. Carl Rogers' efforts for world peace. Person-CenteredReview, 1990, 5(1), 39-56.

Solomon, Z. Does the war end when the shooting stops? The psychologicaltoll of war. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1990, 20(21), 1733-1745.

Sommer, G. et al. (Eds.) Feindbilder im Dienste der Aufrastung: Beitrageaus Psychologie und anderen Humanwissenschaften. (2. Aufl.) Marburg:Interdisziplinare Arbeitsgruppe Friedens- und Abriistungsforschung,1988.

38

38

Sommers, F.G. et al. The nuclear threat and Canadian children. CanadianJournal of Public Health, 1984, 76, 154-156.

Sommers, F.G. & Dineen, T. Curing nuclear madness: A new-age pre-scription for personal action. Toronto: Methuen, 1984.

Spielman, M. If peace comes ... The future expectations of Jewish and ArabIsraeli children and youth. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1984.

Stagner, R. Psychological aspects of international conflict. Monterey, CA:Wadsworth, 1967.

Stanford, B. (Ed.) Peacemaking: A guide to conflict resolution for indi-viduals, groups, and nations. New York: Bantam Books, 1976.

Staub, E. The evolution of caring and nonaggressive persons and societies.Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 81-100.

Staub, E. The psychological and cultural roots of group violence: The GulfWar. Journal of Psychohistory, 1991,19(1), 115-121.

Steiner, P.P. In collusion with the nation: A case study of group dynamicsat a strategic nuclear policy-making meeting. Political Psychology, 1989.10(4), 647-673.

Steinweg, R. Perception of body attitudes as a factor of violence-breedingcommunication: A proposal on grassroots peace education. Bulletin ofPeace Proposals, 1984, 15(1), 93-100.

Steinweg, R. & Wellmann, C. (Eds.) Die vergessene Dimension interna-tionaler Konflikte: Subjektiviteit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990.

Stevenson, B.W., Roscoe, B. & Kennedy, D. Perceptions of conventionalwar: Late adolescents' views. Adolescence, 1988, 23(91), 613-627.

Stewart, G.A. The relationship between adolescents' concern over the threatof nuclear war and several personality dimensions. Canadian Journal ofBehavioural Science, 1988, 20, 452-460.

Stillion, J.M. Examining the shadow: Gifted children respond to the nuclearthreat. Death Studies, 1986, 10, 27-41.

Stillion, J.M. et al. Dimensions of the shadow: Children of six nationsrespond to the nuclear threat. Death Studies, 1988, 12, 227-251.

39

39

Stoddard, F. & Mack, J.E. Children, adolescents and the threat of nuclearwar. In: Noshpitz, J.D. (Ed.) Basic handbook of child psychiatry. Vol. 5.New York: Basic Books, 1987. Pp. 616-627.

Stutz, G. Asikt 90: En undersokning bland ungdom i december 1990. (Med-delande 130.) Stockholm: Styrelsen for psykologiskt forsvar, 1991.

Summers, C. State-sponsored destruction in 1945 and 1990: Effects of con-flicting personal responsibilities. Current Research on Peace and Vio-lence, 1990, 13, 91-96.

Sutton-Smith, B. War toys and childhood aggression. Play & Culture, 1988,1(1), 57-69.

Swingle, P.G. The resolution of conflict. Canadian Psychology, 1989,10(3), 650-661.

Szalay, L.B. & Mir-Djalali, E. Image of the enemy: Critical parameters,cultural variations. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war andpeace. New York: Plenum, 1991. Pp. 213-250.

Taha, M,M.M. The construction and the implementation of an instrument tomeasure the attitudes of college students towards conflict resolutionan;ong nations. (Ph.D.) University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Uni-versity, 1982.

Tajfel, H. Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 1969,25(4), 79-97.

Taylor, A.J. & Patten, M.D. The attitudes and responses of Wellingtonadolescents to nuclear war and other nuclear issues. New Zealand Journalof Psychology, 1988, 17, 36-40.

Templin, R.D. Psychology of war and peace. Journal of Human Relations,1968, 16(2), 239-249.

Tephly, J. Young children's understanding of war and peace. Early ChildDevelopment and Care, 1985, 20(4), 271-285.

Tetlock, P.E. et al. (Eds.) Behavior, society, and nuclear war. New York:Oxford University Press, 1989.

Tetlock, P.E., McGuire, C.B. & Mitchell, G. Psychological perspectives onnuclear deterrence. Annual Review of Psychology, 1991, 42, 239-276.

40

40

Thearle, L. & Weinreich-Haste, H. Ways of dealing with the nuclear threat:Coping and defence among British adolescents. International Journal ofMental Health, 1986,15, 126-142.

Thompson, J. Psychological aspects of nuclear war. Chichester, U.K.:British Psychological Society & Wiley, 1985.

Thompson, J. Social traps and intelligent escapes. In: Swedish ProfessionalsAgainst Nuclear Arms. Disarmament but how? Lulea, Sweden: SwedishPhysicians Against Nuclear Arms, 1988. Pp. 71-80.

Thompson, J.A. Perceptions of the Soviet Union and the arms race: A tennation cross-cultural study. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology ofwar and peace. New York: Plenum, 1991. Pp. 155-167.

Tizard, B. Problematic aspects of nuclear education. Harvard EducationalReview, 1984, 54, 271-281.

Tizard, B. Old and new paradigms: Research on young people's response tothe nuclear threat. Journal of Adolescence, 1989,12(1), 1-10.

Tolley, H. Children and war: Political socialization to international con-flict. New York: Teachers College Press, 1973.

Trygestad, J. & Bents, R. Cross-cultural perspectives on peace. (Paper.)New Orleans, LA: American Educational Research Association, 1988.

Tudge, J. et al. American and Soviet adolescents' attitudes toward thefuture: The relationship between worry about nuclear war and optimism.International Journal of Mental Health, 1990-91, 19(4), 58-84.

Tvingstedt, A.-L. Samtal med elever i arskurs 2 om krig och fred. Peda-gogisk-psykologiska problem (Malmo: School of Education), No. 514,1989.

United Nations. Social psychological techniques and the peaceful settlementof international disputes. New York: UN1TAR, 1970.

Utas Carlsson, K. Samtal om fred och krig med elever i arskurs 5. Peda-gogisk-psykologiska problem (Malmo: School of Education), No. 534,1990.

Vogt, W.R. Militarlogik gegen Zivillogik: Sind Kriege abschaffbar? In:Jahrbuch Frieden 1992. Miinchen: Beck, 1991. Pp. 39-52.

4

41

Volkan, V.D. Psychological concepts useful in the building of politicalfoundations between nations: Track II diplomacy. Journal of the Amer-ican Psychoanalytic Association, 1987, 35(4), 903-935.

Wagner, R.V., de Rivera, J. & Watkins, M. (Eds.) Psychology and the pro-motion of peace. (Special issue of:) Journal of Social Issues, 1988,44(2).

Wahlstrom, R. Psykologiska utgangspunkter for fredsfostran. Nordisk Psy-kologi, 1984, 36, 160-168.

Wahlstrom, R. De ungas uppfattningar om krig och fred. Nordisk Psy-kologi, 1985, 37, 298-309. (a)

Wahlstrom, R. Fear of war, conceptions of war, and peace activities: Theirrelation to self-esteem in young people. In: Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.)Impact of the threat of nuclear war on children and adolescents. Boston,MA: IPPNW, 1985. Pp. 104-111. (b)

Wahlstrom, R. An enemy image as a psychological antecedent of warfareand armament. In: Proceedings of the Congress of European Psy-chologists for Peace. Helsinki: Finnish Psychological Society, 1987. Pp.144-149.

Wahlstrom, R. Growth towards peace and environmental responsibility.Jyvaskyla, Finland: Institute for Educational Research, 1991.

Wahlstrom, R. Promoting commitment to peace and environmental re-sponsibility. Peace. Environment and Education, 1992, 3(1), 33-43.

Waldron, I. et al. Activism against nuclear weapons build-up. Journal ofApplied Social Psychology, 1988, 18, 826-836.

Wallinga, C. et al. Children and nuclear war: Reviews of research. Child-hood Education, 1991, 67(4), 260-263.

Walsh, R. Staying alive: The psychology of human survival. Boston, MA:New Science Library, 1984.

Walsh, R. Psychology of peace. In: Laszlo, E. & Yoo, J Y. (Eds.) Worldencyclopedia of peace. Vol. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1986. Pp.304-307.

Walsh, R. Toward a psychology of human survival: Psychologicalapproaches to contemporary global threats. American Journal of Psy-chotherapy, 1989, 43(2), 158-180.

42

42

Watanabe, P.Y. & Milburn, M.A. Activism against Armageddon: Somepredictors of nuclear-related political behavior. Political Psychology,1988, 9, 459-470.

Watkins, D. & Sampson, J. The attitudes of New South Wales secondarypupils towards various social issues. Australian & New Zealand Journalof Sociology, 1975, 11(3), 69-71.

Watkins, M.M. Moral imagination and peace activism: Discerning the innervoices. Psychological Perspectives, 1985,16(1), 77-93.

Watkins, M.M. Imagination and peace: On the inner dynamics of promo-ting peace activism. Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 39-57.

Wegener-Sparing, G. War toys and aggressive games. Play & Culture,1989, 2(1), 35-47.

Weiss, D.K. Effects of a nuclear education program on nuclear anxiety andhopelessness in adolescents. San Diego, CA: California School ofProfessional Psychology. /Dissertation Abstracts International, 1990,50(11-B), 5338./

Wellington, J. Including the nuclear issue in the school curriculum: Abalanced approach. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1985, 15(3), 127-133.

Werner, P.D. & Roy, P.J. Measuring activism regarding the nuclear armsrace. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49, 181-186.

Westin, C. Majoritet om minoritet: En studie i etnisk tolerans i 80-taletsSverige. Stockholm: Liber, 1984.

Westin, C. Tortyr och existens. Goteborg: Korpen, 1989.

Wetzel, N.A. & Winawer, H. The psychosocial consequences of the nuclearthreat from a family systems perspective. International Journal of MentalHealth, 1986,15, 298-313.

White, R.K. Nobody wanted war: Misperception in Vietnam and otherwars. (Rev. ed.) Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1970.

*White, R.K. Fearful warriors: A psychological profile of U.S.-Sovietrelations. New York: Free Press, 1984.

White, R.K. Ten psychological contributions to the prevention of nuclearwar. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 45-61.

43

43

White, R.K. (Ed.) Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war. NewYork: New York University Press, 1986.

White, R.K. Underestimating and overestimating others' fear. Journal ofSocial Issues, 1987, 43(4), 105-109.

White, R.K. Specifics in a positive approach to peace. Journal of SocialIssues, 1988, 44(2), 191-202. (a)

White, R.K. The stream of thought, the lifespace, selective inattention, andwar. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1988, 28(2), 73-86. (b)

White, R.K. Why aggressors lose. Political Psychology, 1990, 11, 227-242.

Whiteley, J.M. Quest for peace: A film /videotape interview series. Irvine,CA: University of California, 1984.

Wiberg, H. Visions of the future: A cross-national survey. Lund: LundStudies in Sociology, 1977.

Wollman, N. (Ed.) Working for peace: A handbook of practical psychologyand other tools. San Luis Obispo, CA: Impact Publishers, 1985.

Wrightsman, L.S. Parental attitudes and behaviors as determinants ofchildren's responses to the threat of nuclear war. Vita Humana, 1964, 7,178-185.

Zawodny, J.K. (Ed.) Man and international relations. 1-2. San Fransisco,CA: Chandler, 1966.

Ziv, A., Kruglanski, A.W. & Shulman, S. Children's psychological reac-tions to wartime stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1974, 30(1), 24-30.

Zlate, M. Psychological guide marks for a possible pedagogy of peace.Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales, Serie de Psychologie, 1988,32(1), 77-81.

Zur, 0. Neither doves nor hawks: Marking the territory covered by thefield of psychology of peace and war: 1. Contemporary Social Psycho-logy, 1987, 12(3), 89-100.

Zur, 0. On nuclear attitudes and psychic numbing: Overview and critique.Contemporary Social Psychology, 1990, 14(2), 96-110.

Zur, 0. & Morrison, A. Gender and war: Reexamining attitudes. AmericanJournal of Orthopsychiatry, 1989, 59, 528-533.

44

44

Zweigenhaft, R.L. Providing information and shaping attitudes aboutnuclear dangers: Implications for public education. Political Psychology,1985, 6, 461-480. (a)

Zweigenhaft, R.L. Race, sex, and nuclear war. Genetic, Social, and GeneralPsychology Monographs, 1985, 111, 283-301. (b)

Zweigenhaft, R.L. et al. Nuclear knowledge and nuclear anxiety: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Social Psychology, 1986, 126, 473-484.

Zweigenhaft, R.L. et al. Images of nuclear activists in four countries. Jour-nal of Psychology, 1989,123(4), 339-356.

Alvik, T. The development of views on conflict, war and peace amongschool children. Journal of Peace Research, 1968, 5, 171-195. (a)

Alvik, T. The problem of anxiety in connection with investigations con-cerning children's conception of war and peace. Scandinavian Journal ofEducational Research, 1968, 12, 215-233. (b)

45

Abstract card

Bjerstedt, A.

(Ed.) Peace/war issues from a psychological

perspective: A selective bibliography.

Pedagogisk dokumen-

tation (Malmo, Sweden: School of Education),

No. 113, 1992.

In this report examples of publications containing

studies

or discussion related to psychological

aspects of war,

peace etc. and of peace

education are listed. The major

focus is on materials in English from recent years,

with

some examples added from

other language areas.

Keywords: Anxiety, bibliography, enemy

images, nuclear

war, peace, peace education,

prejudice, sex roles, war.

46

Reference card

r-

imp

a, s

3 0.0 0 0 w

o:C

0O66

CD

-% M

"D

)

fD0)

-=

-.o

A: a0

`< 0

O-

W(D (j

)0

CD

3C

D

Bjerstect, A.

(Ed.) Peace/war issues from a psychological

perspective: A selective bibliography. Pedagogiskdokumen-

tation (Malmo, Sweden: School of Education), No. 113, 1992.

47