cerebrale veneuze sinus thrombose: diagnose en behandeling
TRANSCRIPT
Late reopening of adequately
coiled intracranial aneurysms
frequency and risk factors in 400 patients
with 440 aneurysms
Depts of Neurosurgery and Radiology, AMC Amsterdam
Depts of Neurology and Radiology, UMC Utrecht
Dept of Radiology, St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg
Dept of Neurosurgery, Slotervaart Ziekenhuis Amsterdam
Depts of Neurosurgery and Radiology, Leiden UMC
Depts of Neurosurgery and Radiology, VUMC Amsterdam
Depts of Neurology and Radiology, Maastricht UMC
All in the Netherlands
Sandra Ferns, on behalf of the LOTUS study group
Background
• Risk reopening1,2
• Information on ‘late’ (>6 mo) reopening sparse
Purpose:
• To determine frequency of late reopening and
possible risk factors
1; Molyneux et al Lancet 2002, 2; Raymond et al, Stroke 2003
Aneurysm occlusion3
complete neck incomplete
remnant
3; Raymond et al, J neurosurg 1997
Methods
LOTUS STUDY
• Design: multicenter prospective follow-up study
• 7 Dutch participating centers with MEC approval– AMC, Amsterdam
– UMC, Utrecht
– St Elisabeth ZH, Tilburg
– VUMC, Amsterdam
– LUMC, Leiden
– Slotervaart ZH, Amsterdam
– MUMC, Maastricht
Methods
PATIENTS
• Inclusion criteria: – age 18-70
– coiling >4.5 years ago
– GOS 4/5
– adequate aneurysm occlusion after 6 months
– no contra-indications for MRA at 3Tesla
• 400 patients
Methods
IMAGING– 3 Tesla MRI, Philips Medical Systems
– T2 weighted imaging
– MOTSA 3D TOF
– Standard MIP and VR 3D reconstructions
EVALUATION– 2 observers
– Suspected incomplete occlusion: compare to initial and 6 month
angiography
Methods
ANALYSES
• Proportion reopening, retreatment
• Risk factors for late reopening– gender
– rupture status
– size ≥ 10 mm
– posterior circulation
– basilar tip
Results
patients
400 participants younger than
571 non-participants
(mean 55 versus 57 yrs, p<0.001)
mean follow-up 6.0 years
(median 5.0, range 4.5-12.9 yrs)
Participation 74%
16%
Results late reopening
• Agreement 421/440 aneurysms; 95.7%
• Reopening:– 11/400 patients (2.8%, 95%CI 1.4-4.9%)
– with 440 aneurysms (2.5%, 95%CI 1.0-4.0%)
• Retreatment:– 3/440 aneurysms (0.7%, 95%CI 0.2-1.5%)
Results risk factors
• Aneurysm size ≥ 10 mm
(OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.3-16.3, p=0.01)
• Location basilar artery tip
(OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1- 14.6, p=0.04).
3 CASES(Late reopening after adequate coiling at
6 month FU angiography)
1. 49 year-old woman
Ruptured basilar tip aneurysm 12 mm
Directly after coiling 7 m FU 25-8-04
4.7 yrs FU MRA
reopening 3x8 mm
Not retreated
Unfavorable morphology
4.7 yrs FU VR
1. 49 year-old woman
Ruptured basilar tip aneurysm 12 mm
Before embolisation 5 months FU
2. 27 year-old woman
Unruptured additional left carotid tip aneurysm 6 mm
4.5 yrs FU
Reopening 3x3 mm
2. 27 year-old woman
Unruptured additional left carotid tip aneurysm 6 mm
After retreatment4.5 yrs FU DSA4.5 yrs FU VR
3. , 42 year-old woman
Ruptured left PcomA aneurysm 5 mm
Before coiling Directly after coiling 6 month FU
4.9 yrs FU MRA
reopening 4x3mm
No retreatment
Patient refusal
3. ♀, 42 year-old woman
Ruptured left PcomA aneurysm 5 mm
Conclusion
• Yield of long-term (mean 6 years) follow-up MRA of
coiled aneurysms with adequate occlusion at 6
month follow-up angiography is low
– Proportion reopening: 2.5% (11/ 440)
– Retreatment: 0.7% (3/ 440)
LOTUS study group• AMC
S.P. Ferns, PhD student
C.B.L.M. Majoie, radiologist (Principle
investigator)
R. van den Berg, radiologist
M.E.S. Sprengers, radiologist
J.C. van Rijn, radiologist
J.J. Schneiders, PhD student
P.M. Bossuyt, clinical epidemiologist
W.P. Vandertop, neurosurgeon
B.A. Coert, neurosurgeon
• St. Elizabeth Ziekenhuis Tilburg
W.J.J. van Rooij, radiologist
M. Sluzewski, radiologist
• Slotervaart Ziekenhuis
B.J.C.M. Hummelink, neurosurgeon
• UMCU
G.J.E. Rinkel, neurologist
B.K. Velthuis, radiologist
G.A.P. de Kort, radiologist
J.D. Schaafsma, neurologist resident
• VUMC
F. Barkhof, radiologist
J.C.J. Bot, radiologist
• LUMC
P.A. Brouwer, radiologist
M.A. van Walderveen, radiologist
• MUMC
W.H. van Zwam, radiologist
R. van Oostenbrugge, neurologist
Results: late reopeningNo M/F Age Aneurysm
location
Size (mm) Previous
rupture
Size
reopening (mm)
Retreatment
1 F 61 MCA 3 Y 2x1 N*
2 F 54 Basilar tip 5 Y 3x2 N*
3 F 49 Basilar tip 10 Y 5x2 N*
4 M 66 MCA 20 N 6x3 Y
5 F 63 PcomA 7 Y 5x5 Y
6 F 59 ICA tip 12 Y 8x7 N†
7 F 49 Basilar tip 12 Y 8x3 N‡
8 F 27 ICA tip 6 N 3x3 Y
9 F 42 PcomA 5 Y 4x3 N§
10 F 61 SCA 10 Y 9x7 N§
11 F 45 Basilar tip 7 Y 1x2 N*
* Retreatment not judged indicated by multidisciplinary team; † Patient not retreated because of co-morbidity
‡ Patient not retreated because of unfavorable morphology of the aneurysm remnant;
§ Patient refused retreatment
Results: risk factors reopening400 patients/440 aneurysms
with long-term
MRA follow-up
11 patients/ 11 aneurysms
with aneurysm
reopening
OR (95%CI), p
Women 276 (69%) 10 (91%) 4.66 (0.59-36.82), 0.14
Mean age (yrs) 54.5 52.3 -
median, range 55, 23-70 54, 27-66 -
Ruptured aneurysms 344 (78%) 9 (75%) 1.26 (0.27-5.94), 0.77
Mean size (mm) 6.5 8.8 -
median, range 6.0, 2-20 7.5, 3-20 -
Size ≥10 mm 66 (15%) 5 (45%) 5.13 (1.52-17.32), 0.01‡
Intraluminal thrombus 4 (1%) 1 (8%) -
Aneurysm location
Anterior circulation 327 (74%) 6 (55%) -
ACA 143 0 -
MCA 44 2 -
ICA 140 4 -
Posterior circulation 113 (26%) 5 (45%) † 2.51 (0.75-8.38), 0.14
Basilar tip 61 4 † 3.73 (1.06-13.14), 0.04‡