challenges and enablers for rapid product...

25
DOI: 10.4018/IJAIE.2018010102 International Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering Volume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018 Copyright©2018,IGIGlobal.CopyingordistributinginprintorelectronicformswithoutwrittenpermissionofIGIGlobalisprohibited. 25 Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Development Jordan Verrollot, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland Arto Tolonen, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland Janne Harkonen, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland Harri J. O. Haapasalo, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland ABSTRACT Thisarticledescribeshownewproductdevelopment(NPD)iscriticaltomaintainingastrongmarket position.However,full-scaleNPDmayconsumetoomuchtimeandresourceswhennecessaryto reactquicklytocustomerneedsoremergingbusinessopportunities.Rapiddevelopment(RaDe)isa typeofincrementalproductdevelopmentcomplementingtheorganizations’existingNPDprocess. InRaDe,newsalesitemsarecreatedbyredesigningorupgradingexistingproductsinexpensively, andinatimelymanner.ThisarticleaimsatclarifyingthechallengesandenablersrelatingtoRaDe implementation in four case companies and by the means of reviewing literature. The identified challengesincludethedifficultyofdifferentiatingbetweenproductdevelopmentsmodels,thelackof cleardefinitionforRaDeandissuesinproductdatamanagement.Theenablersincludestructuringand managingprojectsdifferentlycomparedtoNPD,theutilizationofexistingsupply-chaincapabilities andthedesignedproductsfittingthecurrentbusinessprocessestoenablerapidproductramp-ups. KEywoRDS Challenges, Enablers, New Product Development Process, NPD, RaDe, Rapid Development, Rapid Product Development INTRoDUCTIoN Thedevelopmentandlaunchofsuccessfulnewproductsareincreasinglycriticaltoallowmarket leadership,healthymarketshare,andsustainedgrowth(Barczak&Kahn,2012;Unger&Eppinger, 2009; Wheelwright & Clark, 1992). New products are created using New Product Development (NPD)processes,whichhavebeendesignedtoberepeatableinordertoreducerisks,costandnon- quality(Cooper,1986;Ulrich&Eppinger,2000).However,milestone-drivenNPDprojectshavebeen criticisedtobetoolinear,toorigidandtooplannedforsmallanddynamicprojects(Cooper,2014) thatrequirereactingquicklytosuddenproductdevelopmentneeds.Phasesandmilestonesmayalso stoptheprojectforunnecessarylongtimes(Ottosson,2004)hinderingthepossibilitiesofconducting thedevelopmentrapidly.Onesingledevelopmentconceptisnotenoughtofitallthevariousranges ofdevelopmentneededintermsofcost,timeorrisk(Becker,2006;Cooper,2008;Ward,2007). Organisationsthatareslowindevelopingnewproductsandareunabletomeetsuddendemands inatimelyfashionoftenloseagainstthosewithamoreagiledevelopmentprocess(Cohenetal., 1996; Smith, 1990). Therefore, shorter lead times and customer responsiveness are seen as key elementsthatinfluencethefirm’ssuccessandperformance(Jayachandranetal.,2004;Krasnikov

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

DOI: 10.4018/IJAIE.2018010102

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

Copyright©2018,IGIGlobal.CopyingordistributinginprintorelectronicformswithoutwrittenpermissionofIGIGlobalisprohibited.

25

Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product DevelopmentJordan Verrollot, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Arto Tolonen, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Janne Harkonen, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Harri J. O. Haapasalo, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

ABSTRACT

Thisarticledescribeshownewproductdevelopment(NPD)iscriticaltomaintainingastrongmarketposition.However,full-scaleNPDmayconsumetoomuchtimeandresourceswhennecessarytoreactquicklytocustomerneedsoremergingbusinessopportunities.Rapiddevelopment(RaDe)isatypeofincrementalproductdevelopmentcomplementingtheorganizations’existingNPDprocess.InRaDe,newsalesitemsarecreatedbyredesigningorupgradingexistingproductsinexpensively,andinatimelymanner.ThisarticleaimsatclarifyingthechallengesandenablersrelatingtoRaDeimplementation in fourcasecompaniesandby themeansof reviewing literature.The identifiedchallengesincludethedifficultyofdifferentiatingbetweenproductdevelopmentsmodels,thelackofcleardefinitionforRaDeandissuesinproductdatamanagement.TheenablersincludestructuringandmanagingprojectsdifferentlycomparedtoNPD,theutilizationofexistingsupply-chaincapabilitiesandthedesignedproductsfittingthecurrentbusinessprocessestoenablerapidproductramp-ups.

KEywoRDSChallenges, Enablers, New Product Development Process, NPD, RaDe, Rapid Development, Rapid Product Development

INTRoDUCTIoN

Thedevelopmentandlaunchofsuccessfulnewproductsareincreasinglycriticaltoallowmarketleadership,healthymarketshare,andsustainedgrowth(Barczak&Kahn,2012;Unger&Eppinger,2009;Wheelwright&Clark,1992).Newproducts arecreatedusingNewProductDevelopment(NPD)processes,whichhavebeendesignedtoberepeatableinordertoreducerisks,costandnon-quality(Cooper,1986;Ulrich&Eppinger,2000).However,milestone-drivenNPDprojectshavebeencriticisedtobetoolinear,toorigidandtooplannedforsmallanddynamicprojects(Cooper,2014)thatrequirereactingquicklytosuddenproductdevelopmentneeds.Phasesandmilestonesmayalsostoptheprojectforunnecessarylongtimes(Ottosson,2004)hinderingthepossibilitiesofconductingthedevelopmentrapidly.Onesingledevelopmentconceptisnotenoughtofitallthevariousrangesofdevelopmentneededintermsofcost,timeorrisk(Becker,2006;Cooper,2008;Ward,2007).

Organisationsthatareslowindevelopingnewproductsandareunabletomeetsuddendemandsinatimelyfashionoftenloseagainstthosewithamoreagiledevelopmentprocess(Cohenetal.,1996; Smith, 1990). Therefore, shorter lead times and customer responsiveness are seen as keyelementsthatinfluencethefirm’ssuccessandperformance(Jayachandranetal.,2004;Krasnikov

Page 2: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

26

&Jayachandran,2008;Sousaetal.,2010).Companiesarefacingpressurestosupplynewproductsconstantlyandrapidlytothemarketwhiletheabilitytoreacttospecificcustomerneedsthroughtheproductrangeisseenvitaltosucceedinglobalcompetition(Forza&Salvador2008).Duetothegrowingimportanceofinnovationandproductdevelopmentinestablishingandmaintainingastrongpositionintheincreasinglycompetitivebusinessarea(Moreno-Moya&Munuera-Aleman,2016;Smith&Reinertsen,1998),thedemandsonproductdevelopmentperformance,intermsofspeedandefficiencyhavebecomemorestringent(Cedergrenetal,2010;VanEchteltetal.,2008;Yadav&Singh,2008).Therefore,theimportanceofthecompanies’capabilitiestoevaluatetheirproductdevelopmentperformancehasincreased(Johnson&Kirchain,2011).

Manytechniquesandapproacheshavebeenstudiedintheliteraturetoreducelead-timeofproductdevelopment(Langerak&Hultink,2008).CompaniesincreasinglyutilizeshortenedNPDmodelstoreducethedevelopmentlead-timesofsmallprojects;75percentoftopperformingbusinessesusesomeformofscalabilityintheirproductdevelopmentprocesses.(Cooper&Edgett,2012).Cooper(2008)hasproposedtoscaledownhisfamousmilestonedrivenproductdevelopmentmodelinordertosuitdifferentprojectneeds.Thelightestversionismeanttoaddressverysmallprojectsrequiringminorchangestoexistingproductssuchassimplecustomerrequests(Cooper,2014).Despitetheextensiveresearchonthemethodstoimprovetheprocessofdevelopingnewproducts,limitedattentionhasbeenpaidtosmallandfastproductdevelopmentprojects,especiallyinthebusiness-to-businessenvironment(Cooperetal.,2004;Kaikkonenetal.2016).Thepreviousstudiesonthetopics(e.g.Cooper,2008;Hänninenetal.,2014;Kaikkonenetal.,2017;Niskanenetal.,2015;Vignaetal.,2015)donotcomprehensivelyexaminethechallengesandenablersrelatedtoimplementingandrunningthosekindsofproductdevelopmentprojects.

The motivation for the study arises from the growing significance of small-scale and rapidincremental product development to fulfill the unexpected market and customer needs (Cooper,2008;Kaikkonenetal.,2017). In this study, the rapidproductdevelopment (RaDe)projectsaredefinedasfastproductdevelopmentactivities,noticeablysmallerinscopeandsizethanprojectsrequiringmultiplestagesandgates.Basedonminormodificationsofexistingproducts,newsellableitemsarecreatedtocomplementthecompany’sproductportfolio.AlthoughorganizationsmaynothavedefinedandorganizedRaDe,productdevelopmentneedsthatrequirequickproductcreationdoemergesuddenly.Therefore,thispaperaimsatexaminingandclarifyingtherelatedchallengesandenablers.ThestudyisrealizedasacombinationofreviewingtheliteratureandanalyzingthepracticesofcompaniesoperatinginFinlandandSweden.

Thepaperisorganizedasfollows.Thefollowingsectionfocusesonidentifyinghowtheliteratureconveys the small-scale product development model. The research process and method and theresultssectionfollow.TheresultsexplainthechallengesrelatedtoRaDeandtheenablersforitsimplementation.Finally,thelastsectionpresentsthediscussionandconclusions.

LITERATURE REVIEw

Productdevelopmentprocessisconnectedtotheproductportfoliomanagementasitstrategicallyandcost-efficientlydeterminesthebestsetofproductstocreate,sell,deliverandcare(Georgiopoulosetal.2002;Sadeghi&Zandieh,2011).Correspondingly,productportfoliomanagementaffectstheproductdevelopmentprocessandthesupplychainprocessesbyselectingtheproducttobecreatedanddelivered.Consequently,theintroductionbytheproductdevelopmentprocessofnewproductswithoutremovingexistingonesfromtheproductportfoliowillgenerateanexplosionoftheportfolio(Tolonenetal.,2015).Theproductproliferationandcannibalizationwillleadtoincreasednumbersofsalesitems,purchasedcomponents,suppliersaswellashigherinventorylevelsandlongerleadtimes(Abbeyetal.,2013;Fisheretal.,1999).

Productdevelopmentaimsatmovingnewproducts, thatmeet thecustomer’sneedsand thestrategicgoalofthecompany,fromideagenerationintoamarketintroduction,includingproduct

Page 3: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

27

design,marketstudy,andmarketinganalyses(Browning&Ramasesh,2007;Cooper,2005;Ulrich&Eppinger,2008).Itcomprisessequentialstepsorsetofactivitiesbeginningwiththeperceptionofamarketopportunityandending in theproduction,sale,anddeliveryofaproduct (Ulrich&Eppinger,2008).Sincethe90s,anumberofNPDframeworks(e.g.,Cooper,2001;Ulrich&Eppinger,2008;Wheelwright&Clark,1992)haveemergedtomeetthevariousneedsoforganizations.Asthecomplexityofdifferentproductdevelopmentprojectsdiffers,thescope,decision-makingprocess,numberofactivities,risklevel,amountofresources,andfundingcommittedalsovarygreatly(Cooper,2008).Utilisinganidenticalprocessforalltheproductdevelopmentprojectsmayresultinrushingrapidprojectsaheadlongeronesandgeneratingunnecessarydelays(Ward,2007).Inanenvironmentwithsuddenanddramaticchanges,productdevelopmentdelaymayinhibitsuccesswhilerapidandefficientcommercializationofnewproductshasbecomeatoppriorityinmanyorganizations(Harmanciogluetal.,2007).Inthelasttwodecades,therelativeportionofincrementalNPDhasgreatlyincreasedinenterprisescomparedtoradicalinnovationsthroughfull-scaleproductdevelopment(Cooper,2013).Oneofthemainobjectivesofincrementalproductdevelopmentistomaketheofferingmoreattractiveandvaluabletothecustomer,thereforeleadingtoincreasedsalesandhigherprofit(Gautam&Singh,2008).Firmswithafastandproductivenewproductdevelopmentprocessareseentoshapepartlythefinancialsuccessoftheproduct(i.e.,revenueandprofitability)(Brown&Eisenhardt,1995).Cooper(2008)hasproposedthenextGenerationStage-Gate®includingashorterandlighterversionofthefamousmilestone-drivenproductdevelopmentmodel.Inordertosuitdifferentprojectneeds(suchasminorchangesprojects),phasesarecombinedandthenumberofgatesisreduced.Lately,differentstudieshavebeencarriedouttocoverthistypeofsmall-scaleproductdevelopmentthatrequiresaminimalengineeringeffort,ashortdevelopmentanddeliverytime(e.g.Hänninenetal.,2014;Kaikkonenetal.,2017;Niskanenetal.,2015;Vignaetal.,2015).Thosestudiesaddressissuesofdecision-making(Hänninenetal.,2014),teamorganization(Kaikkonenetal.,2017;Vignaetal.,2015)orsupplierinvolvement(Niskanenetal.,2015)regardingrapidproductdevelopmentprojects.

Firms face similar challenges of bringing new products to market faster in an increasinglycompetitiveenvironment (suchas the inability topredict thedevelopmentdurationormanagingchangingrequirements)(Ledwithetal.,2006).Theimplementationofthefull-scaleNPDprocess–eveninalighterway–doesnotseemtobetheappropriatemethodincaseofrapiddevelopmentneedsandthusposeschallengesforcompanies.Companiesshouldbeabletobalancetheshort-termneedforincrementaldevelopmentwiththelong-termrequirementsforradicalinnovation(Birkinshaw&Gibson,2004).Thissituationgenerateschallengesforcompaniesinthatitnecessitatesdifferentandoftencontradictorystructures,processesandcultureswithinthesameorganization(Tushman&O’Reilly,1996).Morepractically,Hänninenet al. (2013)uncovered thechallenges related totheneedtorespondquicklytocustomerpreferencesincaseofrapidproductisation(e.g.,howtounderstand, identify and document the customer preferences right from the beginning, how toensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentandproductizationcanalsobesupportedbyunderstandingtheproductizationconceptanditsrelationtoproductportfolio(Harkonenetal.,2015;2017).Infasterproductdevelopment,problemsalsooccurintermofsupplierinvolvement.ComparedtotraditionalNPDandduetotimeconstraint,thecosttendstorise,theprobabilityofdefectsincreasesandlatedeliveriesmayhappenduetopoordeliverycapabilityorcommunication(Niskanenetal.,2015).

LeanproductdevelopmenthasbeenoneoftheleadingapproachadoptedbyorganizationstoimprovetheirNPDprocessandparticularlytoshortenleadtimes.Forinstance,productplatformstrategy,overlappingindevelopmentstages,goodcross-functionalinvolvementandcommunications,aswellassuppliercapabilitiesareseentodecreaseNPDtime(Kärkkäinenetal.,2001;León&Farris,2011;Robertson&Ulrich,1998).OthertechniquestoaccelerateNPDhavebeeninvestigatedandfiveapproachesareseento increase thedevelopmentspeed:supplier involvement, leaduserinvolvement,speedingupactivitiesandtasks,trainingandrewardingofemployees,andsimplificationoforganizationalstructure(Langerak&Hultink,2008).However,thefocusismoreonthefull-scale

Page 4: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

28

NPDandtechniquestoreduceitslead-time,whereasspecificallyaddressingthemanagerialpointofviewandenablersforsmall-scaleandrapidproductdevelopmentprojectsarelimited.Furthermore,techniquesrecognizedforNPDmayincreasethedevelopmenttimeincaseoffastproductdevelopmentprojects, suchas the supplier involvement that cancause latedeliveries (Niskanenet al., 2015).Smith(1990)providedelementsforasuccessfulrapidproductdevelopment, includingaproductstructuredforrapiddevelopment,aco-locatedanddedicatedteamdesignedforrapiddecisionmaking,streamlinedmanagementtechniquesorsensitivitytotime’svalue.Agoodbalanceofthedifferentcompetenciesavailableisalsoseentoenhancetherapidproductdevelopmentcapabilities(Hänninenetal.,2014).Implementingrapidproductdevelopmentwithasimilarfocusaslong-termproductdevelopmentisrecognizedtobemorevaluableforNPDorganizationsbecausethetasks,resourceutilization,andprioritizationcanbedonemoreeffectivelyandimprovethecompany’sprofitability(Kaikkonenetal.,2017).

Othersaspectshavebeenidentifiedtosupportthesuccessofrapidproductdevelopmentprojects.Effectivegovernancecontributestotheproductdevelopmentsuccessandincludesaspectssuchastherightpeopleinvolvedindecision-making,theappropriatemechanismsforfeedbackandaccountabilityaswellasasuitableprocesstomakedecisions(Oakes&vonWeissenberg,2015).Thenecessityoffasterproductdevelopmentdemandsmoreflexibleorganizationsandeffectiveimplementationofcross-functionalteamshasbecomecriticaltothesuccessofproductdevelopmentprojects(Griffin,1997;Hollandetal.,2000).However,theincrementalNPDprojectsmaynotrequirethesamelevelofcross-functionalintegrationthanlargerandverycomplexprojects(Jugendetal.,2017).Bringingtogether teamsofexperts toconductproductdevelopmentactivities isvaluable toaccelerate theprojectsandgatheralltherequiredknowledge(Bretteletal.,2011).TheNPDteamscanbefunctional,lightweight,heavyweightandself-managing(autonomous)(Wheelwright&Clark,1992).Selectedcharacteristics of self-managing teams have been recognized to achieve improvements in rapid,incrementaldevelopmentprojects(Kaikkonenetal.,2017).Additionally,effectiveinteractionbetweenthedifferentstakeholdersisaparticularlyimportantsuccessfactorofproductdevelopmentsuccess(Ernst,2002;Knudsen,2007).

Businesscaseanalysisisanimportanttaskinproductdevelopmenttodecidewhetheraprojectisworthinvestingandwillbeaccepted(Cooper,2011;Otto&Wood,2001).ThecompletebusinesscaseanalysisconductedinmajorNPDmaybetoolaboriousandtime-consuminginsmallerandfasterprojects.Nevertheless, theequilibriumbetweenthe timeconstraintof lightproductdevelopmentprojectsandtheeffortintobusinesscasecalculationiscrucialtomakereasoneddecisions(Kinnunenetal.,2014).Aspartofproductdevelopmentorganization,thetargetsforthelighterproductdevelopmentprojectsshouldbealignedwiththeproductportfoliomanagementtargets,whichareconnectedwiththecompany’sstrategy(Cooper,1999;Tolonenetal.,2014).Tocontroltheachievementofthetargets,companiesutilizekeyperformanceindicators(KPIs)whichshouldberelatedtotheirrespectivegoals(Dombrowskietal.,2013;Matéetal.,2017).

Respondingtothecustomerdemandquicklyrequiresthecapabilitytomanagetheproductdataeffectivelyandproductdatamanagement(PDM)isacrucialcomponenttosupportthisobjective(HooiLeng,2002;Yangetal.,2007).PDMsystemsfacilitatesharingtherightproductinformationat theright timeresulting inreducedproductdevelopment lead-timeandcost (Nairetal.,2001;Philpotts,1996).ProductmodularityisalsoanimportantmethodusedbymanyfirmstoshortenNPDlead-time,minimiseproductdevelopmentcostandcreatesuccessivevariantsofthesameproductline(Mikkola&Gassmann,2003;Danese&Filippini,2010).Forrapidproductdevelopment,thetimepressurepreventsthechangesofinthesupplychainprocessandentailsananticipationofthesupplychainconstraintsatanearlystage(Lee&Sasser,1995;Peroetal.2010).DesignforX(DfX)addressespossibleproductdesignissuesintotheproductdevelopmentphasesothatthenewproductwillconformtotheexistingbusinessprocesses(Holt&Barnes2010;Lehtoetal.,2011).SuccessfulDfXimplementationcanleadtobenefits,whichincludedecreasedproductlifecyclecost,efficientproduct design, quality improvement and shortened time-to-market (Barbosa&Carvalho, 2013;Gatenby&Foo,1990;Kuoetal.,2001).

Page 5: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

29

RESEARCH PRoCESS AND METHoD

Astherehasbeenlimitedresearchonthetopicofrapiddevelopment,thepresentstudyisexploratoryinnatureandappliesaninductiveapproach(cf.Thomas,2006).TheresearchprocessispresentedinFigure1.

Thisstudyutilizesqualitativeandinductiveresearchmethods.TheexistingliteraturewasreviewedtoobtainanunderstandingoftheresearchthathasbeencarriedoutonRaDe.Theliteraturereviewprovidedabasisfortheempiricalanalysis,whichwasperformedthroughamultiple-casestudy.FourcompaniesoperatinginFinlandandSwedenwereselectedasadatasource(onecasecompanyhasbeenanalysedattwodifferentsitespossessingtwodifferentorganisations,resultingintwodifferentcases)andserveasabasisforempiricalstudiesondifferentbusinessareas(e.g.hardware,softwareandservice)anddifferenttypesofindustry.Themaincompanyselectioncriteriaweretooperateinabusiness-to-businessenvironment,toconductNPDprojectsactivelyandtowishtodeveloptheirwayoforganizingfastresponsestodevelopmentneeds.

Thisstudywaspartofaresearchprojectrelatedtorapidproductdevelopment,whichtookplacebetweenSeptember2015andSeptember2017.Thequalitativeresearchdatawerecollectedbycreatingandimplementingasemi-structuredinterviewframeandbyanalyzingthecompanies’documentation(e.g., product development process descriptions). The interviews were conducted with twentyspecialists,selectedbasedontheirprofessionalbackgroundandexpertise(cf.Eisenhardt,1989).Ateachcompany,interviewswereconductedwithalltheinformantsatthesametimeallowing“multiplerespondentstoproviderelevantinputacrossfunctionsandhierarchywithineachorganisation[to]yieldamorecomprehensiveviewofnewproductdevelopmentmanagementpractices”(Barczaketal.,2006:p.518)andhelptoidentifycommonproblemsthatmayaffecttheinterviewee’sresponses(Yin,2003).Theselectedcasecompanies’informationandintervieweecharacteristicsarepresentedinTable1.

Eight semi-structured interviews,with20 informants,wereconductedby seven researchers;theinterviewquestionnairewassentinadvancesothattheinformantshadtheopportunitytogetaccustomedtothequestionsbeforehand.Duringeachinterviewandalternatively,oneresearcheraskedthequestionsbyreferringtotheinterviewguidewhiletheotherslistened,tooknotesandprovidedsupportinfollowingtheinterviewstructure.Thewrittennoteswerepresenteddirectlyonascreentogetimmediatevalidationfromtheinformants.Alltheinterviewswererecorded,transcribedandcompletedbyaddingnotes.Aftercollectingallthedata,analyseswereconductedwithineverycasetoobtainacomprehensiveunderstandingoftheRaDechallengesofeachindividualcase.Additionally,across-caseanalysiswasperformedtocomparethedifferentcaseswithoneanother.Theresultswerediscussedandconfirmedduringfourseparatefocusgroupmeetingswithrepresentativesofall theanalyzedcompanies.Alltheinvolvedresearcherstookpartoftheproofofresult toavoidmisinterpretations.

Thequestionnaireandthedataanalysisweredividedintofourmainsubsets:productdevelopmentprojectportfoliomanagement,theprocessadoptedforrapiddevelopmentandprojectmanagement,teamsetupandcollaboration,andDesignforX(DfX)(Appendix).AsDfXisirregularlyunderstoodinthecasecompanies,ithasbeenpresentedastheproductdesignrequirementsandguidelinesfromthereceivingbusinessprocessespointofviewinordertoavoidproductspecificinvestmentsandprocesses.Theconceptispresentedinthesamewayinthispaper.

Figure 1. Research process

Page 6: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

30

RESULTS

Rapid Development ChallengesThecasecompaniesareutilizingtwotofivedifferentmodelstodevelopnewproductsortechnologies.Thosemodelsrepresentdifferentneedsforthecompanies,fromlongandexpensivetechnology/majornewproductdevelopmenttodevelopmentinvolvingfasterandcheaperminorchanges.Lately,everycasecompanyhasseenanincreasednumberofactivitiesfornearlyalltheproductdevelopmentmodels.

The current operational model of the RaDe type activity is based on engineering changemanagement(ECM)ineverycompany.Initially,ECMaimsatimprovingorreducingthecostofexistingproductswithoutcreatingnewsalesitems.However,theintentionofRaDeisthedevelopmentof thenewsales items.Thetimeframe,goals,andorganizationtorunRaDeprojectsvaryin thedifferentcompanies.ThecompanyBusesECMtocreatenewsalesitemsbasedonexistingmaterials,productionparametersandmanufacturingtechnologieswhiletheothersutilizeECMfortechnicalmodificationsofexistingsales itemswithoutcreatinganewproduct.Unliketheothers, thecasecompanyDdoesnotpossessapermanentRaDelineorganization.Allthecompaniesutilizetheirexistingmanufacturingtechnologiesanddeliverymodels;nonewcapabilitiesinthesupplychainarecreatedduringRaDeprojects.

Productportfoliomanagementisappliedtoeverycompanybutthepracticesdiffer.Allthecasecompaniesutilizebusinesscasesforevaluatingandprioritizingprojects.ProjectportfoliomanagementofRaDeisassignedtoaspecificsteeringteam(ST)inallcompaniesbutthelineorganizationoftheSTChairmanmaybedifferentandthefrequencyofthemeetingsdiffers.ThecriteriaforselectingRaDedevelopmentmodelarealmostsimilarsuchastimeframe,cost,andworkforce.Allthecasecompanieshavemodularproductstructuresavailable.Asamajordifferencetoothers,thecompanyAistheonlyonetofullyuseandrecognizetheproductlifecyclephases.

Table2showsanoverviewofthecompanies’productdevelopmentincludingtheircurrentwayofdevelopingproductsrapidly.

Table 1. Case companies’ information and interviews characteristics

Case Company type and size

Product type

No of interviews

No of informants Role of the informants

A

Telecommunicationandcommunication

equipment.Large

Tangibleand

intangible

2(1,5fulldays) 4

•HeadofProductDevelopment•HeadofProductEngineering

•ProductManager•TechnicalProductManager

B IronandsteelLarge Tangible

2differentsites(1fullday

interviewpersite)

4•HeadofProductDevelopment•ProductDevelopmentManager

•ProductManagers

2 •ProductDevelopmentManager•QualityManager

CElectromagnetic

radiationequipment.Large

Tangible 2(1,5fulldays) 4

•ChiefTechnicalOfficer•ProjectManagementDirector

•ProductDataManager•ProductManager

DConstruction

installationequipment.Medium

Tangibleand

intangible

2(1,5fulldays) 6

•CEOandViceCEO•HeadofR&D

•R&DProjectManager•ProgramManager•ProductManager

•QualityConsultant

Page 7: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

31

Forthisstudy,theECMmodelisconsideredasthecompanies’RaDemodelbecauseitisthefastestproductdevelopmentmodelinvolvingtechnicalmodificationsofanexistingproductornewsalesitemscreation.Lateron,RaDewillbetheonlytermusedtodescribethiskindofmodel.

Rapid Development ChallengesAll interviewed companies see a potential for improvement in their rapid product developmentmodels.PracticalchallengesforRaDeemergedfromthedataanalysisandthediscussionswiththecase companies’ representatives. The results are presented following the interview findings anddividedintothesixgroups:

1. Challengesingeneral2. Challengesongovernancemodelsandteamsetups3. ChallengesonRaDeprocessesandtools4. ChallengesonRaDetargetsandkeyperformanceindicators(KPIs)5. Challengesinproductdatamanagement(PDM)6. ChallengesonDfX

Challenges in GeneralRapiddevelopmentisseenasagenericchallengeinthecasecompanies’regardlessthematurity,thehistoryandtheindustrysectorofthecompany.Duetotheincreasedlevelofcompetition,thedevelopmentofnewproducts is seencrucial for thecasecompaniesandhas recentlycausedanincreasingnumberofactivitiesinproductdevelopment.Asthefullscale,expensiveandresource

Table 2. Case companies’ product development models and RaDe

Case Different product development models Current Rapid development model

A

5models(technology,productplatform,majornewproduct,mediumenhancement,minorchanges)

•ECMworkflow,technicalmodificationsofexistingsalesitems•Permanent“RaDe”lineorganization,co-locatedteam•Timeframe:1–2months,upto6months•200projectsperyear•RaDeprojectportfoliomanagement:bi-weeklymeeting•Goal:costreductions,qualityimprovements

B12models(majornewproduct,minorchanges)

•ECMworkflowcreatingnewsalesitems•Permanent“RaDe”lineorganization,co-locatedteam•Timeframe:1–2days•Hundredsofprojectsperyear•RaDeprojectportfoliomanagement:weeklymeeting•Goal:newproductfunctionalities,costreduction,competition

B22models(majornewproduct,minorchanges)

•ECMworkflowcreatingnewsalesitems•Permanent“RaDe”lineorganization,co-locatedteam•Timeframe:1–2days,uptoonemonth•Hundredsofprojectsperyear•RaDeprojectportfoliomanagement:monthlymeeting•Goal:Newcustomerneedswithhigh-qualityaspects

C

3models(majornewproduct,mediumenhancement,minorchanges)

•ECMworkflow,technicalmodificationsofexistingsalesitems•Permanent“RaDe”lineorganization,co-locatedteam•Timeframe:2–3months•Tensofprojectsperyear•RaDeprojectportfoliomanagement:bi-weeklymeeting•Goal:veryfasttime-to-market,desireforgrowth

D

3models(majornewproduct,mediumenhancement,minorchanges)

•ECMworkflow,technicalmodificationsofexistingsalesitems•Specialisedindividuals,co-located•Timeframe:1–6months,upto9months•50projectsperyear•RaDeprojectportfoliomanagement:weeklymeeting•Goal:creatingsalesrevenue,costreductions,qualityimprovements

Page 8: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

32

consumingnewproductdevelopmentdoesnotfiteverycase,companiesalsostrivetouseafasterproduct development models in case of incremental product development needs with criticaltimeframes.Theselectionoftherightproductdevelopmentmodelisseenasacommonchallengeinthecasecompanies.EventhoughthecompanieshavecriteriatoselecttheRaDetypeofdevelopment,itappearstonotalwaysmatchtheexpectedscopeattheendoftheproject(e.g.,toolongortoocostlyproject).Table3presentsthecompanies’specificgeneralchallengesrelatedtoRaDe.

Challenges on Governance Models and Team SetupsGovernancemodelsforRaDearenotseentobeclearineverycasecompany.ThecompanyApresentsthemostadvancedandstructuredgovernancemodel.Theresponsibilitiesindesign/productdecision-makingandprojectexecutionareclear.However,challengesoccurregardlessthecharacteristicofthegovernanceofthecasecompanies.Productownershiprelatedtorapiddevelopmentactivitiesissometimesseenuncertain.InthecasecompanyB1,itisnotclearwhoownstheproductandconfusionmay arise between technical portfolio and commercial portfolio ownership. Another commonchallengeisrelatedtothedecision-makingtostartRaDeprojects.ThisisshownforexampleinthecasecompanyD,inwhichsomeproductshavebeendevelopedthroughRaDeinordertosupportthesalesofthecoreproductbuttheyhaveendedinactiveintheportfolioandnotsoldasplanned.RaDeteamsetupsalsodifferbetweencompaniesandeveninsidethesamecompany.InthecompanyB,siteB1possessesafullycommittedlineorganizationforRaDewhileinsiteB2,RaDeactivitiesarepartofaqualityteam.Table4presentsthecompanies’specificchallengesrelatedtoRaDegovernancemodelsandteamsetups.

Challenges on RaDe Processes and ToolsRaDehasnotbeendescribedasaclearprocess inanyof thecasecompanies.Mostly theRaDeactivities aredescribed as anECM typeofworkflow, althoughRaDeprocess in caseB2 is notrepresentednordescribed.ToolstorunRaDeprojectsappeartobelackingandchallenging.SomeRaDespecifictemplatesandtoolshavebeendevelopedinsomecasecompaniesinordertomanageRaDeactivities(e.g.,caseDusestaskcardtodocumentandfollowtheproductmodification)buttoolsforprioritization,evaluation,anddecision-makingarelacking.Table5presentsthecompanies’specificchallengesrelatedtoRaDeprocessesandtools.

Table 3. Specific general challenges related to RaDe

Case Specific general challenges related to RaDe

A

•DifficultiesindecidingifarequiredmodificationshouldbeimplementedthroughRapiddevelopment(i.e.modifyinganexistingproduct)orasfeaturestoanewproduct.•RaDeconceptfornewproductcreationisnon-existingbutwellutilizedinfurtherimprovementofexistingproducts.

B1 •Theproductportfolioisgrowinganditsclean-upisnotadequatelyexecuted.•Themodificationrequestisoftenunclear.

B2 •RaDeprocessisnotvisuallyrepresented.•Themodificationrequestisoftenunclear.

C•ThelackofhumanresourcescausesinefficiencytocarryoutRaDeprojects.•MediumenhancementproductdevelopmentmodeloverlapstheRaDemodel.•RaDeconceptfornewproductcreationisnon-existing.

D•Theproductdevelopmentteamcultureisnotenoughcross-functionalyet.•ThecurrentRaDemodeltimeframediffersgreatly.•RaDeconceptfornewproductcreationisnon-existing.

Page 9: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

33

Challenges on RaDe Targets and Key Performance IndicatorsCasecompanieshavecleartargetsandKPIsforRaDeinitiative,includingthetraditionaltargets–cost,timeandquality.IncasecompaniesfocusingtheirRaDeactivitiesoncostreductionandmodificationsofexistingproducts(casecompaniesA,C,D),thetargetssettingismostlymanufacturing,testingandqualityrelated.Incontrast,companiesthataimfornewsellableproducts(casecompanyB)haveawiderbusinessrelatedtargetssetting.Thefollow-upofthebusinesscaseisacommonchallengeforthecasecompanies.Thedevelopedproductisnotsystematicallyevaluatedtodeterminewhethertheexpected targetsdefined in thebusinesscasehavebeen reachedornot.Table6presents thecompanies’specificchallengesrelatedtoRaDetargetsandKPIs.

Challenges on Product Data ManagementPDMisseenasacommonchallengeforeverycasecompany.InthecasesA,B1,andC,RaDeteamisresponsibleforthedatamanagementactivitiesrelatedtotheproductchanges.Regardlessthedatamanagementresponsibilities,gettingdetaileddatafortheproductdevelopmentmaybecomplexduetofragmenteddatabasesanddatasources.AsanexampleincasecompanyD,alotofproductdata,documentation,datasheetswhicharenotcentrallyavailablemakesitdifficulttoefficientlyretrievetheneededinformationfordealingwithRaDeprojects.Table7presentsthecompanies’specificchallengesrelatedtoPDMinRaDe.

Challenges on DfXDfXconcepthasbeenunderstoodandimplementeddifferently.Itisknownasaconceptinonlytwocasecompanies.IncasecompanyA,DfXhasbeendevelopedformanyyearsandtheimplementationoftheprocessissystematicwhileinothercasecompaniestheconceptisnotevenknownasatopic.ThelackofDfXguidelinesandrequirementsmanagementincaseofRaDecausechallengesintherapiddeliveryoftheproducts.IncompanyD,productdesignchangesmaycauseissuesinproductmanufacturing,packaging,andinstallation,thusextendingtheshipmentoftheproducttothecustomer.However, toallow fast andcost-efficientRaDeprojects, thecompaniesaimatnochange in thereceivingbusinessprocessesduetoproductdesign.IncompanyC,itisspecifiedthatinthecaseofRaDe,nonewassembly,testandverificationprocessesshouldbedoneaswellasthefield-provenbuildingblocksandshelfcomponentsshouldbeusedinordertoavoidlengtheningthedevelopmenttime.Table8presentsthecompanies’specificchallengesrelatedtoDfXinRaDe.

Table 4. Specific challenges on governance models and team setups

Case Company-specific challenges on governance models and team setups

A

•Decision-makingrelatedtomultipleproductsisachallenge(componentsareusedintensofdifferentproducts).•Theflowofinformationischallengingduetothesizeandtheworldwideproductdevelopmentteamsofthecompany.

B1 •Nospecificchallenges.

B2•NoRaDeteaminplace.•ThegovernancemodelandorganizationofRaDeisnotclearforapartoftheportfolio.•Clearresponsibilitiesandstructurearelacking.

C•NofullydedicatedteamandnofullcommitmenttotheRaDeprojects.•Resourcesscarcityandattributionconflict.•Lackofprojectmanagementandclearresponsibilities.

D•NoRaDeteaminplace.•Decision-makingininitiatingRaDeprojectsisnotformalized.•Lackofvisibilityontheongoingprojects,theirnumberandthestatusoftheresourceutilization.

Page 10: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

34

Table 5. Specific challenges on RaDe processes and tools

Case Company-specific challenges on RaDe processes and tools

A•RaDeisnotdescribedasaprocessbutasalighterworkflowtypeofactivityanddecision-makingdescription.•Challengesincombininghardwareandsoftware,whicharepartlydevelopedindependently.

B1

•Noactiveproductlifecyclemanagementinuse.•Noactivemanagementofproductrampdowns.•Unformulateddevelopmentrequestacceptancecausinginefficiency.•Utilisationofoldtools.

B2

•Noactiveproductlifecyclemanagementinuse.•Noactivemanagementofproductrampdown.•RaDeprocessisnotrepresentednordescribed.CreationoftheRaDeworkflowisseenasachallenge(description,implementation,follow-up)•Utilisationofoldtools.

C •RaDeprojectsdonotemployanorganizedprocessandcouldbebetterstructured.•Productlifecyclemanagementmodelisunderdevelopmentandyettobeinuse.

D •Noactiveproductlifecyclemanagementinuse.•Nodefinedprocesstocommunicatethedesignchanges.

Table 6. Specific challenges on RaDe targets and KPIs

Case Company-specific challenges on RaDe targets and KPIs

A •Nospecificchallenges.

B1 •NospecificRaDetargetsareinplace.•Theindividualprocessdurationsarenotmeasured.

B2 •Thecostmetricsarenotimplementedyet.

C •Nospecificchallenges.

D •Projectcostandprogressarenotmeasured.•NospecificRaDetargetsareinplace.

Table 7. Specific challenges on product data management

Case Company-specific challenges on Product Data Management

A •PDMsystemsupportsinefficientlyproductmodularityanalysisandmanagement.

B1 •Lackofproperdocumentationandknowledgetransferissues.

B2 •Nospecificchallenges.

C •NoPDMsystemavailable.

D •Nospecificchallenges.

Page 11: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

35

Rapid Development EnablersIn this part, the enablers or prerequisites for implementing rapiddevelopment in companies areproposed.Thesixenablersderivingfromtheliterature,thecasecompanies’interviewsandfromtheanalysisofthechallengesregardingRaDeprojectscanbesummarisedasfollows:

1. Definitionoftheconceptofrapiddevelopment

Theconceptofrapiddevelopmentcouldbeunraveledthroughfundamentalquestionssuchas:whatrapiddevelopmentis,aswellaswhy,whenandhowtoperformRaDe.Thepositiveoutcomesofowningandengagingthiskindofmodelforunexpectedandtime-criticalincrementalproductdevelopmentshouldbeunderstood.ThescopeofRaDeshouldbe identified;RaDeprojectaimsatcreatingnewsales itemsbyquicklymodifyinganexistingproductfittingtheexistingproductportfolio.Thecompanyshouldbecapableof identifying thedifferentdevelopmentrequirementsaswellasestablishrulesandcriteriainordertoselecttherightdevelopmentmodel–subsequentlychoosingtheRaDemodelappropriately.Theexistingproductportfolioshouldalsobestructuredforrapiddevelopment(e.g.,highproductmodularity)andaccordingtothecommonproductdatamanagementandportfoliomanagementconceptinordertoreachthehighutilizationofcommonitemsbothincommercialandtechnicalportfolios.

2. CreationoftheRaDetargetsandKPIs

TheRaDetargetsandKPIsshouldbedefined.Metricssuchasprojectcostorprocessesdurationshouldbemeasured.Thetargetsshouldbeconnectedtothestrategicproductportfoliomanagementtargetstoensurethattheproductstobedevelopedfitwiththecompanystrategy.Thelifecycleofeveryindividualitemfromthecompanyproductportfoliomustbeidentified.

3. CreationofRaDegovernancemodelandteamsetups

Apermanent,nominatedandcompetentRaDeorganizationshouldbeestablished.TherelatedRaDeteamshallbededicated,co-located,autonomous,cross-functionalandabletoperformsmalleffortprojectswithoutbureaucracy.CompetentindividualsinvolvedintheRaDetypeofactivitiesandefficientpeoplemanagementapproachiscrucial.ToensurearapiddeliveryoftheproductdevelopedthroughRaDe,afastandleangovernancemodelmustbedefinedinrelationtotheproductportfoliomanagement.Thestakeholdersandtheirrequirementsshouldbeacknowledgedandconsidered.

Table 8. Specific challenges on DfX

Case Company-specific challenges on DfX

A •ThescopeoftheDfXinRaDeisverynarrowandtheguidelinesarenotstrictlyfollowed.•Themodificationrequestisoftenunclear.

B1 •DfXhasnotbeenimplementedasaconceptandisnotaknownterminology.•Requirementsmaybeunclear.RaDeorganizationlacksrequirementsmanagementknowledge.

B2 •DfXhasnotbeenimplementedasaconceptandisnotaknownterminology.•Requirementsmaybeunclear.

C •DfXisrecognizedasaconceptbutdesignrulesareonlypartiallydocumented.•Customerrequirementsmaybeunclear.

D •DfXhasnotbeenimplementedasaconceptandisnotaknownterminology.

Page 12: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

36

4. CreationofRaDeprocessesandtools

RaDeprocessesandtoolsshouldensureefficientandfastdecisionmakingwhetherornotinitiatetheprojectandthendeliveringtheproductintheagreedterms.RaDemaybedescribedinformofaclearbutflexibleworkflowincludingthebusinesscaseanddecision-makingprocess.TheRapiddevelopmentorganizationshouldrelyontheexperts,whoareactuallydoingtheworkfrombeginningtoendoftheprojectandnotbebasedonatoorigid,hierarchicalandwell-structuredprocess,whichmaydelaytheproductdevelopment.ThetoolsforRaDeshouldfacilitatetheaccomplishmentofalltheactivitiesinacoordinatedmannerinordertoachievetheagreeddeliverytimetothecustomer.

5. Dataavailabilityandreporting

Thedata availability capabilities shouldbe created according to theneeded information forinitiatingandperformingRaDeprojects.Therequiredinformationshouldbeclearandconnectedtocompany’sproductdataandproductportfoliomanagementconceptsclosely.RaDeconcept,targetsandKPIsshouldbeunderstoodandrecognizedbytheinvolvedpersonnelinordertodevelopthedataspecificationincaseofRaDe.TheoriginalrequirementsforRaDeshouldbewellspecifiedanddocumentedatanearlystageoftheprojectandattheend,thelessonslearnedmustbeconsideredandpreservedforfutureactivities.

6. DfX

TheDfXconceptshouldbetakenintousefortherequirementmanagement;theproductdesignchangesincaseofRaDeshouldentailminimalornochangesinthereceivingbusinessprocesses,thusallowingthefastandcost-efficientstartofproductsales,delivery,andcareactivitiesbythebusiness processes. For instance, no new supplier should be involved in RaDe projects and theexistingsuppliersshouldbequalifiedsothattheyarecapableofprovidingtheneededmodulesorcomponentsincaseofRaDe.

DISCUSSIoN

NPDresearchhasbeenongoinginthelastdecadesandnearlyeverycompanyisutilizingamilestone-drivenmodelorsimilartodeveloptheirnewproducts(Cooper,2009).Thismodelpresentsanumberofadvantagesincludingproblemidentifications,progressassessmentandproductqualityassurance(Cooper,1986;Ulrich&Eppinger,2000).However,thismodelmaynotfiteveryproductdevelopmentneedsandusingmultipleapproachesformanagingdifferenttypesofproductdevelopmentiscrucial(Becker,2006;Cooper,2008;Ward,2007).ThisarticlefocusesonthemanagerialviewpointofthelighterandshorterproductdevelopmentprocesscalledRapiddevelopment.Newinsightson thechallengesfacedbycompaniestoruntherapidproductdevelopmentprojectsareprovided.EnablerstoimplementRaDearealsoproposed.Resultsarealignedwiththecurrentliteraturestatingthatinordertoachievefasterproductoffering,adifferentstructureandmanagementcomparedtothetraditionalNPDmodelisnecessary(Birkinshaw&Gibson,2004;Tushman&O’Reilly,1996).Additionally,RaDeprojectsshouldnotcauseaneedtoadaptthesupplychainprocessestoallowimmediateproductramp-ups.ThescopeofchangesincaseofRaDeshouldberestrictedsothatnonewsupplychaincapabilitiesshouldbecreated(suchasnonewsuppliernornewmanufacturingtechnologies).ThisisconsistentwithfindingsconcerningsupplierinvolvementinthecaseofRaDe(Niskanenetal.,2015).

Page 13: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

37

Managerial InsightsThefindingscanaidbusinessmanagersinunderstandingtheroleofRaDeasanalternativeproductdevelopmentframework,whichsupplementsthetraditionalNPD.Whenthecurrentproductportfoliofailstosatisfyeconomicandstrategicbusinessneeds,RaDemodelshouldbeusedtofindasolutionwithinalimitedandshorttimeframe.RaDeisnotmeantfordevelopingradicalinnovations,butrathertocreatenewsalesitems,whichcomplementtheexistingproductportfolio,inafastmanner.ThescopeofRaDeshouldbeclearsothatsmallproductchangesdonotleadtoaradicalinnovation.Itisworthnotingthatfeaturesfromexistingproductsmayberemoved.Otheraspectsshouldbetakenintouseinthewayacompetitiveproductshouldnotonlyaddressashortdevelopmentlead-timebutalsofocusonfactorssuchascost,performance,andquality.ThechallengesandtheenablersforimplementingRaDemodelcanbeusedbypractitionerstounderstandandinitiatethiskindconceptofproductdevelopment.

CoNCLUSIoN

Inthisstudy,thepracticalchallengesrelatedtoRaDewereidentified.Rapiddevelopmentisseenasagenericchallengeregardlessthematurity,industrysectororhistoryofthecompany.Severalreasonsmayinhibitarapidproductdevelopment.TheabilitytocreatenewsalesitemsthroughRaDeisasignificantchallengeinthecasecompaniesandonlyoneiscapableofdoingso.BeforeRaDeactuallytakesplace,selectingtherightproductdevelopmentmodelandsubsequentlychoosingtherapiddevelopmentmodelappropriatelyisnotalwaysseentobeclearevenwithdefinitecriteria.ThedecisionmakingwhethertostartRapiddevelopmentprojectornotisseenchallengingandtoolsforprioritization,evaluationanddecision-makingarelacking.ThedevelopedproductsthroughRaDearenotsystematicallyevaluatedtodeterminewhethertheexpectedtargetshavebeenreachedornot.Additionally,gettingdetaileddatafortheproductdevelopmentmaybechallengingduetofragmenteddatabases.Finally,thelackofDfXguidelinesandrequirementsmanagementincaseofRaDemaycausecomplicationsintherapiddeliveryoftheproducts.

TheenablersforimplementingRaDemustbeconnectedtothemainchallenges.TheinitialbasicenableristoenhancetheunderstandingoftheideaandconceptofRaDe,followedbythecreationofthetargetsandKPIsaccordingtothecompanystrategy.Therefore,RaDegovernancemodel,processes,andtoolsshouldbedefinedandimplemented.Furthermore,theutilizationoftheexistingsupplychainplatformsandthefitoftheproducttobedevelopedwiththecurrentbusinessprocessesareaprerequisiteofRaDe.Finally,thelastenableristhecreationofthedatarequirementspecificationaccordingtotheneededinformationforinitiatingandperformingRaDeprojects.

Thelimitationsofthisstudyincludealimitednumberofcasecompaniesandadeeperanalysiswouldincreasethevalidityofthecurrentfindings.Thestudyfocusesonlargeandmedium-sizedcompanies;hence,thenextstepwouldbetostudysmallerenterprisesandotherindustrysectors.FutureresearchcouldalsofocusonstudyingmoreindetailstheimplementationofRaDe(suchastargets,KPIs,governancemodel)aswellastheimpactsofthiskindofrapidresponsemodelonthereceivingbusinessprocesses(suchasSupplierManagementorManufacturingprocesses).

Page 14: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

38

REFERENCES

Abbey,J.D.,Guide,V.D.R.Jr,&Souza,G.C.(2013).Delayeddifferentiationformultiplelifecycleproducts.Production and Operations Management,22(3),588–602.doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01370.x

Barbosa,G.F.,&Carvalho,J.(2013).AnalyticalmodelforaircraftdesignbasedonDesignforExcellence(DFX)conceptsanduseofcompositematerialorientedtoautomatedprocesses.International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,69(9-12),2333–2342.doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5211-7

Barczak,G.,&Kahn,K.B.(2012).Identifyingnewproductdevelopmentbestpractice.Business Horizons,55(3),293–305.doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2012.01.006

Barczak,G.,Kahn,K.B.,&Moss,R. (2006).Anexploratory investigationofNPDpractices innonprofitorganizations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(6), 512–527. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00221.x

Becker, B. (2006). Rethinking the Stage-Gate process—A reply to the critics. Walthan, MA: ManagementRoundtableInc.

Birkinshaw, J.,&Gibson,C. (2004).Buildingambidexterity intoanorganization.MIT Sloan Management Review,45(4),47–55.

Brettel,M.,Heinemann,F.,Engelen,A.,&Neubauer,S.(2011).Cross‐functionalintegrationofR&D,marketing,andmanufacturinginradicalandincrementalproductinnovationsanditseffectsonprojecteffectivenessandefficiency.Journal of Product Innovation Management,28(2),251–269.doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00795.x

Brown,S.L.,&Eisenhardt,K.M.(1995).Productdevelopment:Pastresearch,presentfindings,andfuturedirections.Academy of Management Review,20(2),343–378.

Browning, T. R., & Ramasesh, R. V. (2007). A Survey of Activity Network‐Based Process Models forManaging Product Development Projects. Production and Operations Management, 16(2), 217–240.doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00177.x

Cedergren,S.,Wall,A.,&Norström,C.(2010).Evaluationofperformanceinaproductdevelopmentcontext.Business Horizons,53(4),359–369.doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2010.03.001

Cohen,M.A.,Eliasberg,J.,&Ho,T.H.(1996).Newproductdevelopment:Theperformanceandtime-to-markettradeoff.Management Science,42(2),173–186.doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.2.173

Cooper,R.G.(2005).Product Leadership: Pathways to Profitable Innovation(2nded.).NewYork,NY:PerseusPublishing.

Cooper,R.G.(2008).Thestage-gateidea-to-launchprocess–update,what’snewandNexGensystems.Journal of Product Innovation Management,25(3),213–232.doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00296.x

Cooper,R.G.(2009).Howcompaniesarereinventingtheiridea-to-launchmethodologies.Research Technology Management,52(2),47–57.doi:10.1080/08956308.2009.11657558

Cooper, R. G. (2014). What’s Next?: After Stage-Gate. Research Technology Management, 57(1), 20–31.doi:10.5437/08956308X5606963

Cooper,R.G.,Crawford,C.M.,&Hustad,T.P.(1986).WinningatNewProducts,byRGCooper.Journal of Product Innovation Management,3(4),307–308.doi:10.1016/0737-6782(86)90024-X

Cooper,R.G.,&Edgett,S.J.(2012).Bestpracticesintheidea-to-launchprocessanditsgovernance.Research Technology Management,55(2),43–54.doi:10.5437/08956308X5502022

Danese,P.,&Filippini,R.(2010).Modularityandtheimpactonnewproductdevelopmenttimeperformance:Investigatingthemoderatingeffectsofsupplierinvolvementandinterfunctionalintegration.International Journal of Operations & Production Management,30(11),1191–1209.doi:10.1108/01443571011087387

Dombrowski,U.,Schmidtchen,K.,&Ebentreich,D.(2013).BalancedKeyPerformanceindicatorsinproductdevelopment.International Journal of Materials.Mechanics and Manufacturing,1(1),27–31.doi:10.7763/IJMMM.2013.V1.6

Page 15: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

39

Eisenhardt,K.M.(1989).Buildingtheoriesfromcasestudyresearch.Academy of Management Review,14(4),532–550.

Ernst,H.(2002).Successfactorsofnewproductdevelopment:Areviewoftheempiricalliterature.International Journal of Management Reviews,4(1).doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00075

Fisher,M.,Ramdas,K.,&Ulrich,K.(1999).Componentsharinginthemanagementofproductvariety:Astudyofautomotivebrakingsystems.Management Science,45(3),297–315.doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.3.297

Forza,C.,&Salvador,F.(2008).Applicationsupporttoproductvarietymanagement.International Journal of Production Research,46(3),817–836.doi:10.1080/00207540600818278

Gatenby,D.A.,&Foo,G.(1990).DesignforX(DFX):Keytocompetitive,profitableproducts.AT & T Technical Journal,69(3),2–13.doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1990.tb00332.x

Gautam,N.,&Singh,N.(2008).Leanproductdevelopment:Maximizingthecustomerperceivedvaluethroughdesign change (redesign). International Journal of Production Economics,114(1), 313–332.doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.070

Georgiopoulos,P.,Fellini,R.,Sasena,M.,&Papalambros,P.Y.(2002).Optimaldesigndecisionsinproductportfoliovaluation.InASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference,Montreal,Canada(pp.593-602).AmericanSocietyofMechanicalEngineers.doi:10.1115/DETC2002/DAC-34097

Griffin,A.(1997).PDMAresearchonnewproductdevelopmentpractices:Updatingtrendsandbenchmarkingbestpractices.Journal of Product Innovation Management,14(6),429–458.doi:10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00061-1

Hänninen,K.,Kinnunen,T.,Haapasalo,H.,&Muhos,M.(2013).SalesandR&Dcooperationandintegrationintherapidproductisationprocess.International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management,6(4),341–351.doi:10.1504/IJBPIM.2013.059139

Hänninen, K., Kinnunen, T., Muhos, M., & Haapasalo, H. (2014). Decisions in setting up rapid productdevelopmentprojectsinSMEs.InR&D Management conference,Stuttgart,Germany.

Harkonen, J., Haapasalo, H., & Hanninen, K. (2015). Productisation: A Review and Research Agenda.International Journal of Production Economics,164,65–82.doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.024

Harkonen,J.,Tolonen,A.,&Haapasalo,H.(2017).Serviceproductisation:Systematisinganddefiningoffering.Journal of Service Management,28(5),936–971.doi:10.1108/JOSM-09-2016-0263

Harmancioglu,N.,McNally,R.C.,Calantone,R.J.,&Durmusoglu,S.S.(2007).Yournewproductdevelopment(NPD)isonlyasgoodasyourprocess:AnexploratoryanalysisofnewNPDprocessdesignandimplementation.R & D Management,37(5),399–424.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00486.x

Holland,S.,Gaston,K.,&Gomes,J.(2000).Criticalsuccessfactorsforcross‐functionalteamworkinnewproductdevelopment.International Journal of Management Reviews,2(3),231–259.doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00040

Holt,R.,&Barnes,C.(2010).Towardsanintegratedapproachto“DesignforX”:Anagendafordecision-basedDFXresearch.Research in Engineering Design,21(2),123–136.doi:10.1007/s00163-009-0081-6

Hooi Leng, L. (2002). Application of product data management within the product development process(Unpublisheddoctoraldissertation).UniversityofHuddersfield,England.

Jayachandran,S.,Hewett,K.,&Kaufman,P. (2004).Customer responsecapability ina sense-and-respondera:Theroleofcustomerknowledgeprocess.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,32(3),219–233.doi:10.1177/0092070304263334

Johnson,M.D.,&Kirchain,R.E.(2011).Theimportanceofproductdevelopmentcycletimeandcostinthedevelopmentofproductfamilies.Journal of Engineering Design,22(2),87–112.doi:10.1080/09544820902960058

Jugend,D.,Araujo,T.R.D.,Pimenta,M.L.,Gobbo,J.A.Jr,&Hilletofth,P.(2017).(forthcoming).Theroleof cross-functional integration in new product development: Differences between incremental and radicalinnovationprojects.Innovation.

Page 16: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

40

Kaikkonen,H.,Haapasalo,H.,&Hänninen,K.(2017).(forthcoming).Characteristicsofself-managingteamsinrapidproductdevelopmentprojects.International Journal of Value Chain Management.

Kaikkonen,H.,Hänninen,K.,&Haapasalo,H.(2016).Organizingproductdevelopmentforrapidresponse.Acasestudyonapproachestowardssuddenproductdevelopmentneeds.In22nd ICE/IEEE International Technology Management Conference,Trondheim,Norway.

Kärkkäinen,H.,Piippo,P.,&Tuominen,M.(2001).Tentoolsforcustomer-drivenproductdevelopment inindustrial companies. International Journal of Production Economics,69(2),161–176.doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00030-X

Kinnunen,T.,Hanninen,K.,Haapasalo,H.,&Kropsu-Vehkapera,H.(2014).Businesscaseanalysisinrapidproductisation.International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing,4(1),14–27.doi:10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2014.062013

Knudsen, M.P. (2007).The relative importance of interfirm relationships andknowledge transfer for newproductdevelopmentsuccess.Journal of Product Innovation Management,24(2),117–138.doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00238.x

Krasnikov,A.,&Jayachandran,S.(2008).Therelativeimpactofmarketing,research-and-development,andoperationscapabilitiesonfirmperformance.Journal of Marketing,72(4).doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.4.1

Kuo, T. C., Huang, S. H., & Zhang, H. C. (2001). Design for manufacture and design for ‘X’: Concepts,applications, and perspectives. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 41(3), 241–260. doi:10.1016/S0360-8352(01)00045-6

Langerak, F., & Hultink, E. J. (2008). The effect of new product development acceleration approaches ondevelopment speed: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 25(3), 157–167.doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2008.06.004

Ledwith,A.,Richardson,I.,&Sheahan,A.(2006).Smallfirm-largefirmexperiencesinmanagingNPDprojects.Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,13(3),425–440.doi:10.1108/14626000610680280

Lee,H.L.,&Sasser,M.M.(1995).Productuniversalityanddesignforsupplychainmanagement.Production Planning and Control,6(3),270–277.doi:10.1080/09537289508930279

Lehto,J.,Harkonen,J.,Haapasalo,H.,Belt,P.,Mottonen,M.,&Kuvaja,P.(2011).BenefitsofDfXinrequirementsengineering.Technology and Investment,2(1),27–37.doi:10.4236/ti.2011.21004

León,H.C.M.,&Farris,J.A.(2011).Leanproductdevelopmentresearch:Currentstateandfuturedirections.Engineering Management Journal,23(1),29–51.doi:10.1080/10429247.2011.11431885

Maté,A.,Trujillo, J.,&Mylopoulos,J. (2017).Specificationandderivationofkeyperformance indicatorsfor business analytics: A semantic approach. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 108, 30–49. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2016.12.004

Mikkola,J.H.,&Gassmann,O.(2003).Managingmodularityofproductarchitectures:Towardanintegratedtheory.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,50(2),204–218.doi:10.1109/TEM.2003.810826

Moreno‐Moya,M.,&Munuera‐Aleman,J.L.(2016).Thedifferentialeffectofdevelopmentspeedandlaunchingspeed onnew product performance: An analysis inSMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2),750–770.doi:10.1111/jsbm.12170

Nair,K.R.A.,Krishnakumar,S.,&Srinivasan,M.S.(2001).RoleofProductDataManagement(PDM)inLeanProductDevelopment(technicalpaper).Presented at SIAT 2001.doi:10.4271/2001-28-0055

Niskanen,T.,Hänninen,K.,&Kujala, J. (2015).Supplier involvement in rapiddevelopment. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development,14(4),273–287.doi:10.1504/IJMED.2015.073808

Oakes,G.,&vonWeissenberg,M.(2015).GovernanceandAgilityinProductDevelopmentOrganizations.InO.Laasch(Ed.),Responsible Governance - International Perspectives for the New Era(pp.39–90).NewYork,NY:BusinessExpertPress.

Ottosson,S.(2004).Dynamicproductdevelopment—DPD.Technovation,24(3),207–217.doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00077-9

Page 17: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

41

Pero,M.,Abdelkafi,N.,Sianesi,A.,&Blecker,T. (2010).Aframeworkfor thealignmentofnewproductdevelopmentandsupplychains.Supply Chain Management,15(2),115–128.doi:10.1108/13598541011028723

Philpotts,M.(1996).Anintroductiontotheconcepts,benefitsandterminologyofproductdatamanagement.Industrial Management & Data Systems,96(4),11–17.doi:10.1108/02635579610117467

Robertson,D.,&Ulrich,K.(1998).Planningforproductplatforms.Sloan Management Review,39(4),19–31.

Sadeghi,A.,&Zandieh,M.(2011).Agametheory-basedmodelforproductportfoliomanagementinacompetitivemarket.Expert Systems with Applications,38(7),7919–7923.doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.054

Smith,P.G.(1990).Fast-cycleproductdevelopment.Engineering Management Journal,2(2),11–16.doi:10.1080/10429247.1990.11414568

Smith,P.G.,&Reinertsen,D.G.(1998).Developing products in half the time: new rules, new tools(2nded.).NewYork,NY:JohnWiley&SonsInc.

Sousa,C.M.,Ruzo,E.,&Losada,F.(2010).Thekeyroleofmanagers’valuesinexporting:Influenceoncustomerresponsivenessandexportperformance.Journal of International Marketing,18(2).doi:10.1509/jimk.18.2.1

Thomas,D.R.(2006).Ageneralinductiveapproachforanalyzingqualitativeevaluationdata.The American Journal of Evaluation,27(2),237–246.doi:10.1177/1098214005283748

Tolonen,A.,Shahmarichatghieh,M.,Harkonen,J.,&Haapasalo,H.(2015).Productportfoliomanagement–Targetsandkeyperformanceindicatorsforproductportfoliorenewaloverlifecycle.International Journal of Production Economics,170,468–477.doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.034

Tushman,M.L.,&O’Reilly,C.A.III.(1996).Theambidextrousorganizations:Managingevolutionaryandrevolutionarychange.California Management Review,38(4),8–30.doi:10.2307/41165852

Ulrich,K.T.,&Eppinger,S.D.(2000).Product design and development(5thed.).NewYork,NY:McGrawHill.

Unger, D. W., & Eppinger, S. D. (2009). Comparing product development processes and managing risk.International Journal of Product Development,8(4),382–402.doi:10.1504/IJPD.2009.025253

VanEchtelt,F.E.,Wynstra,F.,VanWeele,A.J.,&Duysters,G.(2008).Managingsupplierinvolvementinnewproductdevelopment:Amultiple‐casestudy.Journal of Product Innovation Management,25(2),180–201.doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00293.x

Vigna,L.,Hänninen,K.,Kaikkonen,H.,&Haapasalo,H.(2015).Howtobuildawell-performingteamforrapiddevelopment.InR&D Management conference,Pisa,Italy.

Ward,A.C.(2007).Lean product and process development.Cambridge,MA:Leanenterpriseinstitute.

Wheelwright,S.C.,&Clark,K.B.(1992).Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality.NewYork,NY:TheFreePress.

Yadav,O.P.,&Singh,N.(2008).Perspectivesandchallengesforproductreliabilityassuranceintheproductdevelopmentprocess.International Journal of Product Development,5(1-2),4–16.doi:10.1504/IJPD.2008.016367

Yang,X.,Moore,P.R.,Wong,C.B.,Pu, J.S.,&KwongChong,S. (2007).Product lifecycle informationacquisitionandmanagementforconsumerproducts.Industrial Management & Data Systems,107(7),936–953.doi:10.1108/02635570710816685

Yin,R.K.(2003).Case study research: Design and methods(3rded.).BeverlyHills,CA:SagePublicationsInc.

Page 18: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

42

APPENDIX

Background, the Product Development Project Portfolio of The Case CompanyProductDevelopmentProjectPortfolio

1. What are the different product development models in the company’s product developmentportfolio?Suchas◦ Technologydevelopment,platformdevelopment(FullmilestonedrivenNPD)◦ Majornewproductdevelopment(FullmilestonedrivenNPD)◦ Mediumenhancementtypeofproductdevelopment(lightNPD,fewermilestones)◦ Minorchanges(RapidDevelopment,RapidProductisation)

2. Are there only global projects or are there regional, country or customer-specific productdevelopmentprojectsaswell?

3. Arethereothertypesofclassificationsinyourproductdevelopmentportfolio?4. Whatisthesizeofthetechnologyandplatformdevelopmentprojectportfoliosinyourcompany?

◦ Numberofnewtechnologydevelopmentprojects?◦ NumberofnewHWandSWplatformdevelopmentprojects?

5. Howmanyproductdevelopmentprojectsdoyoucarryoutannuallythatresultincompletelynewsalesitems(NPDprojects)?◦ Majornewproductdevelopmentprojects,HWandSW◦ Mediumnewproductdevelopmentprojects,HWandSW◦ Minornewproductdevelopmentprojects,HWandSW

6. Howmanyproductdevelopmentprojectsdoyoucarryoutannuallythoseresultsinimprovementstoexistingsalesitems(improvementprojects)?◦ Majorenhancementforexistingproducts(newversions),HWandSW◦ Mediumenhancementsforexistingnewproductdevelopmentprojects,HWandSW◦ Minornewproductdevelopmentprojects,HWandSW(potentialRaDeprojects)

7. Howareyourproductdevelopmentorganisation’s resources splitbetweendifferent typesofprojects(platform/technology/NPD/improvementprojects)intermsof:◦ Percentageofprojects?◦ Workforce/employees?◦ Costs?

8. Duringpastyears,howhastheamountofproductdevelopmentprojectsdeveloped?(increased/decreased)◦ Inplatformprojects?◦ Intechnologyprojects?◦ NPDprojects?◦ Improvementprojects?◦ Whathavebeentherootcausesofthisdevelopment?

9. Whatareyourproductlifecyclephases?10.Doyouhavemodularproductarchitecture?11.Doyouhavedetailedinformationofyourcurrentproductarchitecture/structure/modulesavailable

inyourcurrenttools?12.Howmanystages/gatesexistinyourNPDprocess?Howaretheydistributedalongthewhole

process?

PortfolioManagementforProductDevelopmentProjects

Page 19: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

43

13.Doyouhaveanorganisationalunitoracross-functionalsteeringbodyforproductportfoliomanagement?

14.Doyouhaveanydescriptionsavailablefortherelatedgovernancemodel?15.Whoisthechairofthecross-functionalsteeringbodyandtherelatedstakeholders?16.Howmanypersonsareinvolvedinproductdevelopmentprojectportfoliomanagementactivities?17.How much power do different participants (roles) have in product development portfolio

managementsteeringgroup?18.What is the frequency of your planned product development project portfolio management

meetings?◦ Whatisthestandardagendaoftheseplannedproductdevelopmentportfoliomanagement

meetings?19.Whatarethemaintoolsutilisedinproductdevelopmentportfoliomanagement?

◦ Withinprojects/productevaluation?◦ Prioritisationanddecision-making? (Strategicapproaches,diagrams,matrices, financial

KPIs,simulations,mathematicalmethods,etc.)20.Howdoyourtoolssupportcollaborationwithsuppliersforadequateinformationsharingduring

development?21.Whatkindofcommunicationandchangemanagementtasksaredonebyproductdevelopment

projectportfoliomanagement?◦ Whodoesthiscommunication?

CriteriafortheSelectionofProductDevelopmentModels

22.HowisprioritisationbetweendevelopmentprojectsdoneduringNewProductDevelopment?23.Whataretheevaluationcriteriatoprioritisewhichproductdevelopmentprojectsaretobestarted

orcontinued?◦ Howisbusinesscaseinvestigationandplanningconducted?◦ Whatarethestagesinbusinesscaseevaluation?

24.Whatareproductdevelopmentprojectportfoliomanagementtargets/keyperformanceindicators(KPIs)?

25.Whatarethetoolsutilisedinprioritisationandevaluation?Forexample:◦ Design-for-X(DfX)requirementsfromreceivingbusinessprocessespointofview◦ Sizeofthetechnicalchanges◦ Sizeandnumberofneedednewfunctionalities◦ Sizeoftheplannedworkamount◦ Time-to-market◦ Sizeoftheprojectbudget◦ NumberofparticipatingR&Dlocations◦ Somethingelse,pleasedescribe?

Rapid Development Process and Project ManagementRapidDevelopmentProcess

26.WhatisthestrategicgoalofRaDetypeofproductdevelopment?◦ Consumerneedsforanewproductfunctionality?◦ Competition’sperformance?◦ Costreduction?◦ Geographicaldifferentiation?◦ Somethingelse,pleasedescribe?

Page 20: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

44

27.Whatkindofinformationisneededtodecidebetweendifferentproductdevelopmentmodels?◦ HowdoyoudecidewhetheraproductdevelopmentisNPDorRaDe?

28.WhatkindofimpactdoesthefollowingcriterionhaveinthedecisionbetweenanNPDandRaDeproject?◦ Architecturalcompatibility◦ Needed(development)workeffort◦ Developmenttime◦ Neededresources◦ Demandforothermarketsorcustomers◦ Designforvariability◦ Productstrategy◦ Productvariation

29.WhatkindsofproductsareusuallycarriedoutusingRapidDevelopment?30.WhatkindofproductchangerequirementsareusuallycarriedoutusingRapidDevelopment?31.WhatarethemajorprocesschangesfortheRapidDevelopmentprocesscomparedtoNPD?32.WhatarethetypicalprojectphasesinRapidDevelopmenttypeofproductdevelopment?

◦ Doyouhaveanyprocessdescriptionsavailable?33.Howmanystages/gatesexistinyourRapidDevelopmentprocess?

◦ HowarethesestagesdifferentfromnormalNPDstages?34.Are there mandatory development phases that must be done in every product development

project?(IncludingNPDandRaDe)35.WhichphasescanbecompromisedoroverlookedinordertoachieveagilityandspeedinRapid

Developmentprojects?36.WhatisthetypicaldurationofaRapidDevelopmentproject?(comparisonwithfull-scaleNPD)37.WhatisthedistributionoftimespentineachphaseofRapidDevelopment?38.WhatisthedistributionofcostsspentineachphaseofRapidDevelopment?39.ArethefollowingdevelopmentphasesusedinRapidDevelopment,oraretheyratherusedin

normalNPDtypeofproductdevelopmentprojects?◦ Feasibilitystudy(Includingrequirementmanagementandfeaturemanagement)◦ Projectplanning◦ Specificationandconceptualising◦ Design◦ Developmentandintegration◦ Pilotingandtesting◦ Rampup

40.Whoarethestakeholdersinvolvedineachphase?◦ Whatisthenatureofyourcustomerrequirementscreeningprocess?

41.Whatarethedecision-makingpointsinRapidDevelopmentprojects?◦ Arethesedecision-makingpointstime-basedordoestheprojectneedtofulfilmilestone

criteriafirst?

RaDeGovernanceModelsandDecisionMakingBodies

42.Who are the stakeholders influencing and having requirements for the Rapid Developmentactivities?◦ WhatistheroleofthedifferentstakeholdersintheRaDevaluechain?◦ WhatistheimpactofthedifferentstakeholdersintheRaDevaluechain?◦ WhatisthecontributionofthedifferentstakeholdersintheRaDevaluechain?

43.Whatkindofgovernancemodel,steeringandmanagementboardsareorganisedforinitiatingandmanagingRapidDevelopmentprojects?

Page 21: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

45

44.HowdoesthedecisionmakingtakeplacetoinitiateaRapidDevelopmentproject?45.HowareRapidDevelopmentprojectsestablished?(suchasnominationoftheprojectmanager

andateam)46.HowisthedecisionmakingorganisedduringRapidDevelopmentprojects?

◦ WhatkindsofdecisionscanbemadeinternallybytheRapidDevelopmentprojectteamandwhatkindsofdecisionsneedtoberaisedtohighersteeringbodies?

RaDeProjectManagement

47.WhatisthefrequencyoftheplannedRapidDevelopmentprojectmanagementteammeetings?48.WhoaretheparticipantsinRapidDevelopmentprojectmanagementmeetings?

◦ Whatarethestandardagendatopicsofthesemeetings?49.Howarerapiddevelopmentprojectsorganisedinthecompany?Forexample:

◦ ByBusinessUnitsandBusinesslines?◦ Insomeotherway,suchasthetypeofproductdevelopmentprojects?

50.Whohasthefinancialresponsibilitytomakebudgetallocationdecisions(e.g.thesizeoftheoverallprojectbudgetanditsallocationwithintheproject)inRapidDevelopmentteams?

51.WhohastheresponsibilityforprojectplanningandprojectmanagementinRapidDevelopmentprojects?

ProductDevelopmentTargetsandKeyPerformanceIndicators(KPIs)forRapidDevelopment

52.Whatarethetargetsandthemetricsforproductdevelopmentprojects?IncludingbothNPDandRaDeprojects.◦ IsthereanydifferenceintermsoftargetsandmetricsforRaDeprojects?

53.WhatarethetypicaltargetsandKPIsforrapiddevelopmenttypeofproductdevelopmentprojects?54.Howdoyoumeasuretheprogressofrapiddevelopmentprojects?55.WhatisthedifferenceindeliverycapabilitycreationofrapiddevelopmentcomparedtoNPD?56.WhatisthedifferenceinsalescapabilitycreationofrapiddevelopmentcomparedtoNPD?57.WhatisthedifferenceinservicecapabilitycreationofrapiddevelopmentcomparedtoNPD?

OrganisingRapidDevelopment

58.DoyouhaveanychallengesinproductownershipandproductgovernancerelatedissuesinRapidDevelopment?

59.WhatarethemainchallengesrelatedtoproductportfoliomanagementinRapidDevelopment:◦ Inproductportfoliotargetsettingandmeasurementrelatedissues?◦ Inportfoliomanagementprocessrelatedissues?◦ Inportfoliomanagementtoolsrelatedissues?◦ Inportfolioandproductdata(anddataavailability)relatedissues?◦ Somethingelse,pleasedescribe?

60.How would you improve your company’s product portfolio management related to RapidDevelopment?

61.WhatarethesuccessfactorsforRapidDevelopmentprojects?

Team Set Up and CollaborationNewProductDevelopment(NPD)ProjectTeamSetup

Page 22: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

46

62.WhatisthecompositionofyourNPDteams?63.WhodotheNPDteammembersreporttoduringtheprojectsandhow?64.WhoaretheteamleadersinNPDprojects?65.HowaretheNPDteamstasksassigned?66.Whatistheextentofself-managementinNPDteams?67.HowbigaretheNPDteamsandarethereanydifferencesbasedondifferenttypesofprojects?68.Howarepeopleassignedand/orchosenforNPDteams?69.WhatisthelevelofworkspentontheprojectfortheNPDteammembers?(Full-timevs.Part-time)70.AreNPDteamsco-locatedordispersedbetweendifferentlocations?71.HaveyoudefinedacoreteamandanextendedteamforNPDprojects?72.WhatarethecorecompetenciesofpeopleinNPDprojects?

◦ ProjectManagement◦ HWcreation◦ SWcreation◦ Integrationandverification◦ SalesCapabilityCreation(Marketing,SalesandContracting)◦ DeliveryCapabilityCreation(Purchasing,manufacturing,testing,logistics)◦ ServiceCapabilityCreation(productinstallation,productimplementation,use,maintenance

andrepair)73.HowdoyouensureNPDteammembersknowthecommoncommitmentandgoals?74.HowareNPDteamsrewarded?75.HowmuchcantheNPDteamsinfluencetheirownworkpractices?

RapidDevelopmentProjectTeamSetup

76.WhatisthecompositionofyourRapidDevelopmentteams?◦ AretheredifferencesbetweenNPDandRapidDevelopmentprojectsinregardstoteam

composition?77.WhodotheRapidDevelopmentteammembersreporttoduringtheprojectsandhow?

◦ WhatisthenumberofmanageriallevelsinRapidDevelopmentprojects?78.WhoaretheteamleadersinRaDeprojects?79.HowaretheRapidDevelopmentteams’tasksassigned?80.Whatistheextentofself-managementinRapidDevelopmentteams?81.HowbigaretheRapidDevelopmentteamsandarethereanydifferencesbasedondifferenttypes

ofprojects?82.Howarepeopleassignedand/orchosentoRapidDevelopmentteams?83.WhatisthelevelofworktimespentontheprojectsfortheRapidDevelopmentteammembers?

(Full-timevs.Part-time)84.AreRapidDevelopmentteamsco-locatedordispersedbetweendifferentlocations?85.HaveyoudefinedacoreteamandanextendedteamforRapidDevelopmentprojects?86.WhatarethecorecompetenciesofpeopleinRapidDevelopmentprojects?

◦ ProjectManagement◦ HWcreation◦ SWcreation◦ Integrationandverification◦ SalesCapabilityCreation(Marketing,SalesandContracting)◦ DeliveryCapabilityCreation(Purchasing,manufacturing,testing,logistics)◦ ServiceCapabilityCreation(productinstallation,productimplementation,use,maintenance

andrepair)

Page 23: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

47

87.HowdoyouensureRapidDevelopmentteammembersknowthecommoncommitmentandgoals?

88.HowareRapidDevelopmentteamsrewarded?89.HowmuchcantheRapidDevelopmentteamsinfluencetheirownworkpractices?

CollaborationandCommunicationinRapidDevelopmentTeams

90.WhatkindofcommunicationmechanismsareusedinyourRapidDevelopmentprojects?◦ Doyoufeelthatyourcurrentcommunicationmechanismsareadequate?◦ Couldyoudescribeasituation,wherethecommunicationinyourteamwasworkingwell?

Whywasitworkingwell?◦ Couldyoudescribeasituation,wherethecommunicationinyourteamwasnotworking

well?Whywascommunicationnotworkingwell?91.HowarethecommunicationandcollaborationmechanismsdefinedinRapidDevelopmentteams?

(Openvs.well-defined)92.HowisinformationmanagedinduringRapidDevelopmentprojects?

◦ Howisinformationordatasharedifnecessary?93.Whatarethemainchallengesincommunication?

◦ Howdoyouovercomethesechallenges?94.HowdoyoucommunicatewithcustomersduringRapidDevelopmentprojects?95.HowdoyoucommunicatewithotherstakeholdersduringRapidDevelopmentprojects?96.WhatkindofinformationisneededfromsuppliersduringRapidDevelopment?

◦ WhatkindofinformationisneededbysuppliersduringRapidDevelopment?97.What kinds of tools are used for virtual communication in Rapid Development? (Virtual

communicationincludesinstantmessaging,email,wikis,intranets,etc.)◦ Areyourvirtualcommunicationtoolseffective?

98.Whendoyouuseface-to-facecommunicationratherthanvirtual?99.Howtheteamscooperatewithotherdevelopmentteamsduringprojects?(Formally?Informally?)

KnowledgeCreationandProblem-SolvinginRaDeProjects

100.Howareproblemsindevelopmentprojectshandled?101.Howaresolutionstoproblems/newideassharedbetweenteammembersandothermembers

ofyourorganisation?102.Doyou think that theexpertiseofall the teammembers is fullyutilisedwhensolving the

problems?◦ Couldyoudescribeasituation,whereyouwereabletoefficientlysolveaprobleminyour

team?Whywasproblem-solvingworkingwell?◦ Couldyoudescribeasituation,whereyourteamwasnotabletosolveaprobleminyour

team?Whatwasitnotworkingwell?103.Doyouorganisetrainingforyourdevelopmentteammembers?104. Ifanemployeewishestolearnanewskill,howwouldheapproachtheissue?105.Whatwouldyoudoinasituation,whereyounoticethatyourteam’sexpertiseisnotenough

tosolvetheproblem?

DfX, Business Process Requirements and Product Design RulesDfXStakeholdersandRequirements

106.Whoareyourinternalstakeholders?Whataretheirrequirements?

Page 24: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

48

107.Whoareyourexternalstakeholders?Whataretheirrequirements?108.How are the coordination &communication requirements from both internal and external

partnersacknowledgedbythecompany?109.Howaretherequirementsprioritised?110.Howaretheconflictingrequirementsfromvariousstakeholdersaddressed?111.Onwhatbasisiseachrequirementmeasured?(targets)112.WhataretheDfXconcepts/disciplinesinyourcompany?113.WhatistargetedbyDfXinthecompany?114.Whataretheparticularbusinessbenefitsintheorganisationintendedtobeachievedthrough

variousDFXconsiderations?115.WhatarethetypicalDfXtargetsandKPIs?116.WhatarethetypicalrelatedDfXproductdesignguidelines?117.WhatprocedureorprinciplesaretakenintousebytheorganisationtoimplementDfXpractices?118.Howarethedesignrequirementsmanagedinyourorganisation?119.Whatstepshavebeentakenduringearlyproductdevelopmenttopreparesales/delivery/service

capabilities?120.HowisthetrainingrelevanttoDfXorotherproceduresconducted?

◦ Whoisresponsibleforthetrainingsessionsandtowhomaretheyconducted?121.Doesthecompanyhaveanyinitiativessupportingsimultaneousproductdevelopmentactivities

anddevelopmentactivitiesforreceivingbusinessprocesses(concurrentengineering)?Ifyeshowisitdone?

ManagementandToolsofDfX

122.HowistheDfXmanagementorganised?123.How is the communicationofneedsofdifferentDfXdisciplines coordinated intoproduct

developmentandtheorder-deliveryprocess?124.Whoarethekeyresponsiblepersonsforeachdiscipline?Whataretheirroles?125.HowistheDfXinformationmanaged?Whatkindsoftoolsareusedforinformationmanagement?126.HowaretheDfXactivitiesorganisedinproductdevelopmentprojects?Istheorganisational

structure/teamsetupstandardforalltheproductdevelopmentprocess?Ifnot,onwhatbasisdoesitchange?

127.HowaretheDfXtoolscategorised(guidelines,checklist,metrics,mathmodel,method)?◦ WhatDfXconsiderationsdothesetoolsinclude?

128.CouldyoudescribeyourDfXtoolsindetail(attachdocumentsifnecessary)?◦ Arethesetoolsstandardforalltheprojects?◦ Arethesetoolssupportedbyanysoftwareprogram?Ifyes,howisitsupported?

129.WhataretheDfXchallengesidentifiedintheorganisation?130.WhatstepshavebeentakenforimprovementofDfXapproach?

DfXinRapidDevelopmentProjects

131.WhatistheDfXapproachforRaDeprojects?132. InwhatphasesofRapidDevelopmentisDfXapproachimplemented?133.HowisyourDfXapproachdifferentinyourRapidDevelopmentprojectscomparedtoNPD?134.WhataretheDfXfactorsaddedorcompromisedinaRapidDevelopmentproject?135.WhataretheDfXfactorscommonforbothNPDandRapidDevelopmentprojects?136.AretheDfXtoolsusedforRapidDevelopmentprojectsdifferentfromthatofNPD?

◦ Ifyes,howisitdifferent?

Page 25: Challenges and Enablers for Rapid Product Developmentjultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfi-fe201804196722.pdf · ensurearapidturnaroundtimeforthespecificationanddevelopmentplan).Rapiddevelopmentand

International Journal of Applied Industrial EngineeringVolume 5 • Issue 1 • January-June 2018

49

137.WhatarethemostimportantDfXfactorsfromRapidDevelopmentperspective?138.DidthesequestionsbringupanythingelsethatyouwouldliketoshareaboutRapidDevelopment?

Jordan Verrollot received MSc in 2012 from the University of Technology of Troyes, France. He joined Industrial Engineering and Management, Faculty of Technology at the University of Oulu, Finland in 2014. His research interests include supply chain management, product management, product portfolio management and product development.

Arto Tolonen received an MSc in Engineering (1992) and Dr (Tech) in Industrial Engineering and Management (2016) from the University of Oulu, Finland. Currently, he is a Senior Research Fellow in Industrial Engineering and Management at the University of Oulu. His current research interests are product management, product portfolio management, product data management and rapid product development. He has over 20 years of experience in development of business processes and operational management of Design for Excellence product design principles, delivery capability creation, supply chain management and product data management in global companies.

Janne Harkonen received Bachelor’s degree (1st Class Honours) in Engineering Business Management from the University of Greenwich in the UK and both MSc in Process Engineering and Dr (Tech) in Industrial Engineering and Management, from the University of Oulu, Finland. He has also studied in the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, USA. He has experience working in the IT and environmental technology industries. Currently, he is a Senior Research Fellow at the University of Oulu in Finland. Dr Harkonen has authored and co-authored over 50 journal articles, and also a number of other publications.

Harri J.O. Haapasalo is a Professor of Product Management at Industrial Engineering and Management, University of Oulu in Finland. He has two main areas of research: one in product management, product development and the second one in the area of complex systems management, lean construction and business models. He has been very active in obtaining research projects, and active in journal publications. His list of publications contains more than 250 international items. He has supervised more than 30 doctoral theses and been an external examiner for more than 30 doctoral dissertations.