challenges with clp and solutions offered by akzonobel

12
Challenges with CLP and solutions offered by AkzoNobel Sorel Muresan, Section Manager TS&d Cleaning EMEIA Gabi Bongen, Julius Hoesch Visit us at booth 608

Upload: sorel-muresan

Post on 26-Jan-2017

292 views

Category:

Science


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Challenges with CLP and solutionsoffered by AkzoNobel

Sorel Muresan, Section Manager TS&d Cleaning EMEIAGabi Bongen, Julius Hoesch

Visit us at booth 608

Ingredientclassified as:

Concentration triggering classification of a mixture as:

Reversible Eye EffectCategory 2

Irreversible Eye EffectCategory 1

Before (DPD) From 1 June(CLP)

Before (DPD) From 1 June(CLP)

H319 (R36) ≥20% ≥10%

H318 (R41) ≥5% but <10% ≥1% but <3% ≥10% ≥3%

2

Generic concentration limits for substances triggering classification ofmixtures have changed.

Challenges with CLP

AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry | SEPAWA Fulda 2015

Example: The classification for a mixture with 4% product classified as H318 will change from notclassified to eye effect category 1.

Not classified products – amphoterics

3

Product Chemistry Main properties Typical applications

Ampholak® 7CX/C Sodiumcocoamphopolycarboxyglycinate

High foamingHydrotropicMild surfactant

Laundry detergentVery effective in washing-upliquids especially in combinationwith Amphoteen 24

Ampholak® 7TX Sodiumtallowamphopolycarboxyglycinate

Chelating propertiesEffective stain removalHydrotropicHigh foamingMild surfactantScale inhibition

Car cleaningHousehold an InstitutionaldetergentsLaundry detergentWashing-up liquid

Ampholak® XO7/C Sodiumoleylamphopolycarboxyglycinate

High foam surfactantHigh electrolyte toleranceMild surfactant

High alkaline high foam cleanerLaundry detergentHand dish wash

AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry | SEPAWA Fulda 2015

4

The special amphoteric Ampholak 7TX

is more efficient in reducing the eye

irritation score compared to a standard

CAPB (cocoamidopropyl betain).

Total Draize score of Sodium Laureth-2 Sulfate and amphoteric mixtures.Approx. 8% active matter, pH 7

Reducing eye irritation of anionic surfactants

AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry | SEPAWA Fulda 2015

5AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry | SEPAWA Fulda 2015

Berol® 260Excellent fatty soil removal in water based cleaning productsespecially when it is combined with performance boosting co-surfactants

Berol® 840Low foaming nonionic surfactant with defoaming properties onprotein foam

Ethylan® 1003Excellent emulsifying and wetting propertiesLow foaming hydrophobic surfactant for cold degreasingVery good aquatic toxicity

The classification has been changed from H318 to H319

Changes in classification

6

Cleaning tests – Household formulationsNon-mechanical cleaning of ceramic tiles soiled with “kitchen soil”(20% Lambert soil, 50% corn oil, 30% water)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Formulation 1 Formulation 2 Commercialproduct 1

Commercialproduct 2

%So

ilre

mov

ed

Formulation 11% Berol 2602% Berol SurfBoost AD150.5% Dissolvine GL-47-SBalance waterpH ~11

Formulation 23% Berol 1851% Berol SurfBoost AD150.5% CitrateBalance waterpH ~8

Commercial product 1<5% nonionic surfactantspH ~11

Commercial product 25-15% nonionic surfactantspH ~11

Formulations 1 and 2 provides better or equal cleaning performance as the two references.

Notclassified

AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry | SEPAWA Fulda 2015

Notclassified

Cleaning tests – I&I formulations

7AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry | SEPAWA Fulda 2015

Formulation 1

Formulation 2

Formulation 3

Formulation 4

Formulation 15.0% Berol 2606.5% SCS (40%)5.0% Dissolvine GL-47-S1.0% Alcoguard 4160Balance water

Formulation 25.0% Berol 2604.5% Berol R648 NG5.0% Dissolvine GL-47-S1.0% Alcoguard 4160Balance water

Formulation 35.0% Berol 2604.5% Berol R648 NG5.0% Dissolvine GL-47-S1.0% Alcoguard 41603.0% PnPBalance water

Formulation 44.0% Berol 2600.5% Ethylan 10054.0% Berol R648 NG5.0% Dissolvine GL-47-S1.0% Alcoguard 4160Balance water

Mechanical cleaningIKW tests using the Sheen scrubber

The unique chemistry of Berol R648 NG enables superiorcleaning performance at low concentrations

BCOP in-vitro tests

8AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry | SEPAWA Fulda 2015

Not classified

irritant

corrosive

not-classified

Corrosive / Cat 1H318

no in vitro methods toclassify

Moderate / Cat 2H319

source: A.I.S.E 2014ERASM SteeringCommittee meeting

IVIS > 55

IVIS < 3Ethylan 1005/1008

Berol R648 NGBerol 260/266

AG 6206

9

A.I.S.E. / CESIO in vitro program

ERASM EDI project to address concentration related effects (SCL)

with pure and diluted surfactants for eye damage/irritation

Main project objectives:– Develop an in vitro test strategy to set specific concentration

limits for surfactants.– Develop a method to allow classification as Category 2 based

on in vitro data.

On-going activities

AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry | SEPAWA Fulda 2015

Summary

10

To support customers in creating new solutions to meet thestricter regulations demands AkzoNobel Surface Chemistryoffers surfactants with• reduced or no classification• superior cleaning performance at low concentrations

On-going activities to understand better the relation betweenin-vitro and in-vivo eye test results for CLP classification ofsurfactants

AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry | SEPAWA Fulda 2015

Thank you for your attention

11Surface Chemistry EMEIA - Cleaning

Legal disclaimer

12AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry | SEPAWA Fulda 2015