chapter 2000000

Upload: angeline-perez-macabenta

Post on 08-Aug-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/22/2019 Chapter 2000000

    1/4

    CHAPTER 2

    REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

    Foreign Literature

    Multicultural education incorporates the idea that all students

    regardless of

    their gender and social class, their ethnic racial, and cultural characteristics

    should have

    an equal opportunity to learn in school (Banks, 1989, pp. 2-3). This new

    vision of

    education has special precedence in California because of its diverse

    population. In 27

    California, the sum of all minority students now constitute a majority of

    the total

    student population (Campbell, 2010, p. 22). California teachers need to

    understand the

    diverse population that they are serving, and that includes getting to know

    the

    background of all of their students, which includes Filipinos. Especially since

    Filipinos

    are invisible and least researched (Cimmarusti, 1996; Cordova, 1983; Nadal,

    2009)

    teachers need more opportunities to learn about this fragile culture.

    Campbell states the need for multicultural education best. US society has

    divisions in racial, class, and gender, to mention a few. The educational

    system should

    acknowledge cultural differences, and especially recognize the knowledge

    and languages

    of all children. Campbell (2010) summarizes, To do this, teachers should

    know about,

    respect, and draw strength from diverse cultural traditions present in our

    society (p. 40).

  • 8/22/2019 Chapter 2000000

    2/4

    This statement includes Filipinos, so that they are not misperceived and

    grouped in with

    other Asians or mistakenly included with Hispanics, but acknowledged as

    their own

    individual cultural and ethnic group.

    For while Filipino may be the language of identity, it is the language of the

    streets. It might have

    the capacity to be the language of learning, but it is not the language of the

    learned It is neither

    the language of the classroom and the laboratory, nor the language of the

    boardroom, the court

    room, or the operating room. It is not the language of privilege. I may be

    disconnected from my

    being Filipino, but with a tongue of privilege I will always have my

    connections. So I have my

    education to thank for making English my mother language. (James Michael

    Soriano)

    The language is the soul of the nation. A country may be politically free and

    independent, yet if

    it does not have a national language of its own that is used by its government

    and its people, it is

    devoid of a soul, of a spiritual light. We may be declared politically free in the

    future, but the

    fetters that bind the soul of our nation will not be broken unless we can also

    have a national

    language in which we can express our thoughts, ideas, and sentiments as a

    nation.

    - Aruego (1949)

  • 8/22/2019 Chapter 2000000

    3/4

    Language as a communicative system varying among different populations

    is commonly

    acknowledged to function as an important symbol of group identity, often

    stimulating a natural

    sense of solidarity among communities sharing a single variety of speech,

    and is sometimes

    deliberately manipulated to create feelings of belonging to populations larger

    than the local or the

    regional, and the significant establishment of fully extensive national

    identities in independent

    states.

    - Simpson (2008)

    Local Literature

    It is intriguing to remember that the foundation of the First Republic, the

    Philippines is a country with deep nationalistic feelings but no national

    linguistic symbolism (Gonzales, 1980). So the study of national identity was

    not focused on problems in language of the country pagsasainstitusyon

    affiliate First Republic of determining which language of the Philippines more

    than suffice to represent the ego and its culture.

    Remember that in 1934-1935 Constitutional conventions only had official.

    Identifying the desire to have the national language loob stand as a symbol

    of the Filipinos. At the same time it 'cooking' the proposed provisions for

    Having national language. Even so, it would be considered breakthrough

    legislature of the Philippines as spoken by Gonzalez (1980):

    From the arguments presented, we judged present if true spoken of

    former Director of the SWP, Jose Villa Panganiban as' our national language [P

    / Filipino]

    until now looking more like its own country (in Gonzalez, 1980).

  • 8/22/2019 Chapter 2000000

    4/4