chapter 4 - organizational and managerial issues in logistics.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
Organizational and Managerial Issues in Logistics
Learning Objectives
• To examine organizational structure for logistics
• To explain about traditional and contemporary organizational design for logistics
• To elaborate productivity issues in logistics
• To define quality issues in logistics
• To discuss issues associated with reverse logistics
• To describe programs designed to lessen the impact of terrorism on logistics systems
Copyright © 2015
Organizational and Managerial Issues in Logistics Key Terms
• “C-level” position
• Centralized logistics organization
• Container Security Initiative (CSI)
• Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)
• Decentralized logistics organization
• Excess capacity
• Fragmented logistics structure
• Importer Security Filing (ISF) rule
Copyright © 2015
Organizational and Managerial Issues in Logistics Key Terms
• ISO 9000
• Lean Six Sigma
• Logistics service quality
• Logistics social responsibility
• Logistics uncertainty pyramid model
• Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award
• Pilferage
• Productivity
• Reverse Logistics
• Tachograph
• Theft
Copyright © 2015
Organizational and Managerial Issues in Logistics Key Terms
• Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
• Unified logistics structure
Copyright © 2015
Organizing Logistics within the Firm
• Two key organizational logistics topics
– Organizational structure
– Organizational design
Copyright © 2015
Organizational Structure for Logistics
• Two basic organizational structures are:
– Fragmented logistics structure
• Logistics activities are managed in multiple departments throughout an organization
– Unified logistics structure
• Multiple logistics activities are combined into and managed as a single department
Copyright © 2015
Organizational Structure for Logistics
• Two basic organizational structures for logistics departments are:
– Centralized logistics organization
• Company maintains a single logistics department that administers the related activities for the entire company from the home office
– Decentralized logistics organization
• Logistics-related decisions are made separately at the divisional or product group level and often in different geographic regions
Copyright © 2015
Organizational Structure for Logistics
• Job title or corporate rank
– Leading edge organizations tend to head the logistics department by senior-level personnel
– Generally excluded from holding a “C-level” position
Copyright © 2015
Organizational Design for Logistics
• Three primary types of organizational design include:
– Hierarchical (functional)
• Top-down flow
– Matrix
• Cross-functional responsibilities
– Network
• Process philosophy focused on combining tasks into value-creating products and activities
Copyright © 2015
Organizational Design for Logistics
• Network organizational design is manifested in terms of:
– Relevancy
• Refers to satisfying current and emerging customer needs
• Facilitated by developing mutually beneficial relationships with key customers
• At a minimum, these relationships should provide an understanding of customer needs and wants
Copyright © 2015
Organizational Design for Logistics
• Network organizational design is manifested in terms of:
– Responsiveness
• Reflects the degree to which an organization can accommodate unique or unplanned customer requests
• Achieved when the appropriate decision markers are provided with both relevant information and the authority to address unique or unplanned requests
Copyright © 2015
Organizational Design for Logistics
• Network organizational design is manifested in terms of:
– Flexibility
• Is an organization’s ability to address unexpected operational situations
• Predicated on avoiding early commitment to an irreversible course of action
Copyright © 2015
Managerial Issues in Logistics
• Productivity
• Quality
• Risk
• Sustainability
• Complexity
Copyright © 2015
Measurement Problems
1. Quality may change while the quantity of inputs and outputs remains constant
2. External elements may cause an increase or decrease in productivity
3. Precise units of measure may be lacking
Productivity Challenge
Productivity is the ratio of outputs (goods and services) divided by the inputs (resources such as
labor and capital)
The objective is to improve productivity!
Important Note!Production is a measure of output only and
not a measure of efficiency
Feedback loop
Outputs
Goods
and
services
Transformation
The U.S. economic system
transforms inputs to outputs at
about an annual 2.5% increase in
productivity per year. The
productivity increase is the result
of a mix of capital (38% of 2.5%),
labor (10% of 2.5%), and
management (52% of 2.5%).
The Economic System
Inputs
Labor,
capital,
management
Improving Productivity at Starbucks
A team of 10 analysts continually look for ways to shave time. Some improvements:
Stop requiring signatures on credit card purchases under $25
Saved 8 seconds per transaction
Change the size of the ice scoop
Saved 14 seconds per drink
New espresso machines Saved 12 seconds per shot
Improving Productivity at Starbucks
A team of 10 analysts continually look for ways to shave time. Some improvements:
Stop requiring signatures on credit card purchases under $25
Saved 8 seconds per transaction
Change the size of the ice scoop
Saved 14 seconds per drink
New espresso machines Saved 12 seconds per shot
Operations improvements have helped Starbucks increase yearly revenue per outlet by $250,000 to $1,000,000 in seven years.
Productivity has improved by 27%, or about 4.5% per year.
▶ Measure of process improvement
▶ Represents output relative to input
▶ Only through productivity increases can our standard of living improve
Productivity
Productivity =Units produced
Input used
Productivity Calculations
Productivity =Units produced
Labor-hours used
= = 4 units/labor-hour1,000
250
Labor Productivity
One resource input single-factor productivity
Multi-Factor Productivity
Output
Labor + Material + Energy + Capital + Miscellaneous
Productivity =
► Also known as total factor productivity
► Output and inputs are often expressed in dollars
Multiple resource inputs multi-factor productivity
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/day
Payroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
=Old labor
productivity
8 titles/day
32 labor-hrs
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/day
Payroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
8 titles/day
32 labor-hrs=
Old labor productivity
= .25 titles/labor-hr
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/day
Payroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
8 titles/day
32 labor-hrs=
Old labor productivity
=New labor
productivity
= .25 titles/labor-hr
14 titles/day
32 labor-hrs
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/day
Payroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
8 titles/day
32 labor-hrs=
Old labor productivity
= .25 titles/labor-hr
14 titles/day
32 labor-hrs=
New labor productivity
= .4375 titles/labor-hr
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/day
Payroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
=Old multifactor
productivity
8 titles/day
$640 + 400
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/day
Payroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
8 titles/day
$640 + 400=
Old multifactor productivity
= .0077 titles/dollar
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/day
Payroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
8 titles/day
$640 + 400=
Old multifactor productivity
=New multifactor
productivity
= .0077 titles/dollar
14 titles/day
$640 + 800
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/day
Payroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
8 titles/day
$640 + 400
14 titles/day
$640 + 800
=Old multifactor
productivity
=New multifactor
productivity
= .0077 titles/dollar
= .0097 titles/dollar
QuestionThe Dulac Box plant produces wooden packing
boxes to be used in the local seafood industry.
Current operations allow the company to make 500
boxes per day, in two 8-hour shifts (250 boxes per
shift). The company has introduced some small
changes in equipment, and conducted appropriate job
training, so that production levels have risen to 300
boxes per shift. These changes did not require any
change in the amount of capital spending or energy
use. What is the firm's new labor productivity?
Answer
600 boxes per day / 16 hours = 37.5
boxes per hour
Question
Felicien grows mirlitons (that's Cajun for
Chayote squash) in his 100 by 100 foot garden.
He then sells the crop at the local farmers'
market. Two summers ago, he was able to
produce and sell 1200 pounds of mirlitons. Last
summer, he tried a new fertilizer that promised
a 50% increase in yield. He harvested 1900
pounds. Did the fertilizer live up to its promise?
Answer
Two summers ago Last summer Change
1200 ÷ 10,000 =.12lbs/sq. ft
1900 ÷ 10,000 = .19 lbs/sq. ft
(.19 - .12) ÷ .12 =58.3%
Since the productivity gain was 58.3%, not 50%, the
fertilizer was at least as good as advertised.
Question
Martin Manufacturing has implemented several
programs to improve its productivity. They have
asked you to evaluate the firm's productivity by
comparing this year's performance with last
year's. The following data are available:Last Year This Year
Output 10,500 units 12,100 units
Labor Hours 12,000 13,200
Utilities $7,600 $8,250
Capital $83,000 $88,000
Has Martin Manufacturing improved its productivity
during the past year?
Answer
Resource Last Year This Year Change Pct. Change
Labor 10500 / 12000 = 0.88 12100 / 13200 = 0.92 0.04 4.8%
Capital 10500 / 7600 = 1.38 12100 / 8250 = 1.47 0.09 6.2%
Energy 10500 / 83000 = 0.13 12100 / 88000 = 0.14 0.01 8.7%
Productivity improved in all three categories this year;
utilities showed the greatest increase, and labor the
least.
Productivity
• Can be defined as the amount of output divided by the amount of input
• Provides insight into the efficiency with which corporate resources are being utilized
Copyright © 2015
Three Ways to Improve Productivity
• Reduce the amount of input while holding output constant
• Increase the amount of output while holding input constant
• Increase output while decreasing input
Copyright © 2015
Worker Productivity
• Warehousing and transportation are heavily dependent on human labor
• Human labor is an input (i.e. workers receive wages or salaries)
• Productivity improvement efforts in logistics are often directed toward increasing the amount of output while holding input constant (workers resistant to suggestions regarding reduced wages or salaries)
Copyright © 2015
Worker Productivity
• Logistics-operating employees are unionized in some areas
• Warehousing facilities have specific work rules
• Warehouse employees can be monitored by direct supervision
• Transportation employees (truck drivers) can be monitored through technology, i.e. tachograph
Copyright © 2015
Asset Productivity
• Asset-related productivity concerns include:
– Space utilization
• Excess capacity– Unused available space
– Can be unproductive as it may result in the purchase of additional equipment or facilities which adds costs (input), but may not yield additional output resulting in a productivity decline
– Improving the output from existing assets
• Increases productivity as inputs remain constant, but output is increased
Copyright © 2015
Quality
• Logistics service quality
– Relates to a firm’s ability to deliver products, material and services without defects or errors to both internal and external customers1
1E.A. Morash, C. Droge, and S. Vickery, “Strategic Logistics Capabilities for Competitive Advantage and Firm Success,” Journal of Business Logistics 17, no. 1 (1996): 1-22.
Copyright © 2015
Quality
• Quality in logistics involves trade-offs
– If inferior logistic service quality, customers may perceive lower value
– If superior logistic service quality than expected or required, organization may be adding unnecessary cost
• Organizations must try to match the quality levels of the logistic services they provide with the expectations of their customers and the landscape in which they operate.
Copyright © 2015
Quality
• Vendors are expected to have quality programs
• Vendors can demonstrate commitment to quality to potential buyers through achieving and maintaining quality program certification
• ISO (International Standards Organization) 9000 certification is an example of a quality program certification
1E.A. Morash, C. Droge, and S. Vickery, “Strategic Logistics Capabilities for Competitive Advantage and Firm Success,” Journal of Business Logistics 17, no. 1 (1996): 1-22.
Copyright © 2015
Quality
• ISO 9000
– Is a set of generic standards used to document, implement, and demonstrate quality management and assurance systems
– Is applicable to both manufacturing and service firms
– Standards are intended to help companies build quality into every core process in each department
Copyright © 2015
Quality
• ISO 9000
– Firms demonstrating commitment to quality through training, reviews, and continuous improvement achieve initial ISO 9000 certification
– Once certification is obtained, audits are conducted annually and organizations can be recertified every 3 years
– Certification is credited with
• an increase in customer service
• improved order accuracy
• enabling enhanced costs analysis1
1Paul D. Larson and Stephen G. Kerr, “ISO and ABC: Complements or Competitors?” International Journal of Logistics Management 13, no. 2 (2002): 91–100.
Copyright © 2015
Quality
• Six Sigma (or six standard deviations)
– Is a quality focused methodology that emphasizes the virtual elimination of business errors
– Area covered under a normal curve is by six standard deviations is 99.999%
– Approach suggests that there will be 3.4 defects, deficiencies, or errors per one million opportunities
– Can be applied to various logistics activities such as order picking
Copyright © 2015
Quality
• Six Sigma (or six standard deviations)
– Benefits
• Reduced costs
• Reduced errors and waste
• Reduced cycle time
– Drawbacks
• Overcoming business cultural barriers
• Investing required resources (both human and money)
• Gaining top management commitment
Copyright © 2015
Quality
• Lean Six Sigma
– Is a quality focused methodology that integrates Six Sigma with the Lean approach
– Integrates the goals and methods of these two approaches in pursuit of quality
– Unique because it recognizes that organizations cannot focus only on quality or speed
– Emphasizes an organizational focus on improving quality as it relates to responsiveness
Copyright © 2015
Quality
• Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award
– Recognizes organizations for their achievements in quality and performance
– Established in the late 1980’s
– Restricted to firms headquartered in the United States
– Eligibility initially limited to:
• Manufactures, services, and small businesses
– Eligibility expanded to include:
• Health care and educational institutions
Copyright © 2015
Risk
• Can be viewed as susceptibility to disruptions that could lead to a loss for a firm
• Can take a variety of forms as it relates to logistics management activities
– Regularly occurring (or operational) risks, i.e. variability in demand or potential for a damaged shipment
– Catastrophic risks, i.e. earthquakes or terrorist attacks
Copyright © 2015
Risk
• Logistics Uncertainty Pyramid Model
– Established to identify uncertainty sources that can affect the risk exposure for logistics activities
– Identifies several types of uncertainty including shipper, customer, carrier, control systems, and external
Copyright © 2015
Risk
• Terrorism is an example of catastrophic risk• Terrorism can be defined as “an illegal use of or
threat of force or violence made by a group or individual against a person, a company, or someone’s property with a goal of menacing the target, often grounded in politics or ideology.”1
1Source: Terrorism, The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed. (n.d.). Retrieved from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorism.
Copyright © 2015
Risk
• September 11 terrorist attacks have impacted logistics practices on a worldwide basis
• Greater attention given to:
– Processes
– Procedures
– Activities
Copyright © 2015
Risk
• Creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
– Federal agency
– Goals are
• To prevent terrorist attacks in the U.S.
• To reduce the vulnerability of the U.S. to terrorism
Copyright © 2015
Risk
• 22 separate government entities were incorporated into DHS
– Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
• Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
– Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
• Container Security Initiative (CSI)
• Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)
• Importer Security Filing (ISF) rule also known as “10+2” (example in Table 4.2)
Copyright © 2015
Table 4.1: Timeline for Presenting Electronic Advance Manifest Information
Copyright © 2015
Table 4.2: Information Required for 10+2 Rule
Copyright © 2015
Risk
• Theft is an example of an operational risk
• Theft (stealing) can be defined as the taking and removing of personal property with the intent to deprive the rightful owner of it.1
1www.m-w.com/dictionary
Copyright © 2015
Risk
• Thoughts regarding theft
– Insurance companies may reimburse for loss, but time and costs tend not to be covered
– Theft results in the planned flow of goods being interrupted which can lead to stockouts
– Theft can factor into facility location decisions
Copyright © 2015
Risk
• Thoughts regarding pilferage (employee theft)
– Transportation and warehousing operations are particularly vulnerable to pilferage
– Managing pilferage begins with the hiring process
– Zero tolerance pilferage policy
– Keep goods moving through the system
– Recent increase in pirate attacks
Copyright © 2015
Sustainability
• Logistics Social Responsibility– Corporate social responsibility issues that relate directly to
logisticsSource: Craig R. Carter and Marianne M. Jennings, “Logistics Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework,” Journal of Business Logistics 23, no. 2 (2002): 145-180.
• Potential dimensions include:– Environment– Ethics– Diversity– Safety – Philanthropy– Human rights– Others
Copyright © 2015
Sustainability
• Reverse logistics
– Is the process of managing return goods
– Exceeds $100 billion in U.S. alone
– Can be 4-5 times more expensive than forward logistics
– Process can take 12 times as many steps as forward logistics
Copyright © 2015
Sustainability
• Reverse logistics process focuses on:
– Why products are returned
– How to optimize reverse logistics
– Whether reverse logistics should be managed internally or outsourced to a third party1
1John Paul Quinn, “Are There Ever Any Happy Returns?” Logistics Management, June 2005, 63–66.
Copyright © 2015
Complexity
• Network complexity– Is the growing number of nodes and the associated changes
to the links in logistics systems
• Process complexity– Centers on the haphazard development of processes,
additions and modifications to processes over time, and/or changing process requirements
• Range complexity– Centers on the implications associated with the increasing
number of products that most companies continue to face in an effort to differentiate themselves with their customers
Copyright © 2015