chapter 4 utility maximization and choice copyright ©2002 by south-western, a division of thomson...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 4
UTILITY MAXIMIZATION
AND CHOICE
Copyright ©2002 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
MICROECONOMIC THEORY
BASIC PRINCIPLES AND EXTENSIONS
EIGHTH EDITION
WALTER NICHOLSON
Complaints about Economic Approach
• No real individuals make the kinds of “lightning calculations” required for utility maximization
• The utility-maximization model predicts many aspects of behavior even though no one carries around a computer with his utility function programmed into it
Complaints about Economic Approach
• The economic model of choice is extremely selfish because no one has solely self-centered goals
• Nothing in the utility-maximization model prevents individuals from deriving satisfaction from “doing good”
Optimization Principle• To maximize utility, given a fixed amount
of income to spend, an individual will buy the goods and services:
– that exhaust his or her total income– for which the psychic rate of trade-off
between any goods (the MRS) is equal to the rate at which goods can be traded for one another in the marketplace
A Numerical Illustration• Assume that the individual’s MRS = 1
– He is willing to trade one unit of X for one unit of Y
• Suppose the price of X = $2 and the price of Y = $1
• The individual can be made better off– Trade 1 unit of X for 2 units of Y in the
marketplace
The Budget Constraint• Assume that an individual has I dollars
to allocate between good X and good Y
PXX + PYY I
Quantity of X
Quantity of Y The individual can afford
to choose only combinations
of X and Y in the shaded
triangleYP
IIf all income is spent
on Y, this is the amount
of Y that can be purchased
XP
I
If all income is spent
on X, this is the amount
of X that can be purchased
First-Order Conditions for a Maximum
• We can add the individual’s utility map to show the utility-maximization process
Quantity of X
Quantity of Y
U1
A
The individual can do better than point A
by reallocating his budget
U3
C
The individual cannot have point C
because income is not large enough
U2
B
Point B is the point of utility
maximization
First-Order Conditions for a Maximum
• Utility is maximized where the indifference curve is tangent to the budget constraint
Quantity of X
Quantity of Y
U2
B
constraint budget of slopeY
X
P
P
constant
curve ceindifferen of slope
UdX
dY
MRSdX
dY
P
P
UY
X constant
-
Second-Order Conditions for a Maximum
• The tangency rule is only necessary but not sufficient unless we assume that MRS is diminishing– if MRS is diminishing, then indifference curves
are strictly convex• If MRS is not diminishing, then we must
check second-order conditions to ensure that we are at a maximum
Second-Order Conditions for a Maximum
• The tangency rule is only necessary but not sufficient unless we assume that MRS is diminishing
Quantity of X
Quantity of Y
U1
B
U2
A
There is a tangency at point A,
but the individual can reach a higher
level of utility at point B
Corner Solutions• In some situations, individuals’ preferences
may be such that they can maximize utility by choosing to consume only one of the goods
Quantity of X
Quantity of Y U2U1 U3
A
Utility is maximized at point A
At point A, the indifference curve
is not tangent to the budget constraint
The n-Good Case
• The individual’s objective is to maximize
utility = U(X1,X2,…,Xn)
subject to the budget constraint
I = P1X1 + P2X2 +…+ PnXn
• Set up the Lagrangian:
L = U(X1,X2,…,Xn) + (I-P1X1- P2X2-…-PnXn)
The n-Good Case• First-order conditions for an interior
maximum:
L/X1 = U/X1 - P1 = 0
L/X2 = U/X2 - P2 = 0•••
L/Xn = U/Xn - Pn = 0
L/ = I - P1X1 - P2X2 - … - PnXn = 0
Implications of First-Order Conditions
• For any two goods,
j
i
j
i
P
P
XU
XU
/
/
•This implies that at the optimal allocation of income
j
iji P
PXXMRS ) for (
Interpreting the Lagrangian Multiplier
• is the marginal utility of an extra dollar of consumption expenditure– the marginal utility of income
n
n
P
XU
P
XU
P
XU
/...
//
2
2
1
1
n
XXX
P
MU
P
MU
P
MUn ...
21
21
Interpreting the Lagrangian Multiplier
• For every good that an individual buys, the price of that good represents his evaluation of the utility of the last unit consumed– how much the consumer is willing to pay
for the last unit
iX
i
MUP
Corner Solutions• When corner solutions are involved, the
first-order conditions must be modified:
L/Xi = U/Xi - Pi 0 (i = 1,…,n)
• If L/Xi = U/Xi - Pi < 0 then Xi = 0
• This means that
iXii
MUXUP
/
–Any good whose price exceeds its marginal value to the consumer will not be
purchased
Cobb-Douglas Demand Functions
• Cobb-Douglas utility function:U(X,Y) = XY
• Setting up the Lagrangian:L = XY + (I - PXX - PYY)
• First-order conditions:
L/X = X-1Y - PX = 0
L/Y = XY-1 - PY = 0
L/ = I - PXX - PYY = 0
Cobb-Douglas Demand Functions
• First-order conditions imply:
Y/X = PX/PY
• Since + = 1:
PYY = (/)PXX = [(1- )/]PXX
• Substituting into the budget constraint:
I = PXX + [(1- )/]PXX = (1/)PXX
Cobb-Douglas Demand Functions
• Solving for X yields
•Solving for Y yields
XPX
I*
YPY
I*
•The individual will allocate percent of his income to good X and
percent of his income to good Y
Cobb-Douglas Demand Functions
• The Cobb-Douglas utility function is limited in its ability to explain actual consumption behavior– the share of income devoted to particular
goods often changes in response to changing economic conditions
• A more general functional form might be more useful in explaining consumption decisions
CES Demand• Assume that = 0.5
U(X,Y) = X0.5 + Y0.5
• Setting up the Lagrangian:
L = X0.5 + Y0.5 + (I - PXX - PYY)
• First-order conditions:L/X = 0.5X-0.5 - PX = 0
L/Y = 0.5Y-0.5 - PY = 0
L/ = I - PXX - PYY = 0
CES Demand• This means that
(Y/X)0.5 = Px/PY
• Substituting into the budget constraint, we can solve for the demand functions:
]1[*
Y
X
X PP
PX
I
]1[*
X
Y
Y PP
PY
I
CES Demand
• In these demand functions, the share of income spent on either X or Y is not a constant– depends on the ratio of the two prices
• The higher is the relative price of X (or Y), the smaller will be the share of income spent on X (or Y)
CES Demand• If = -1,
U(X,Y) = X-1 + Y-1
• First-order conditions imply that
Y/X = (PX/PY)0.5
• The demand functions are
]1[
* 5.0
X
YX P
PP
XI
]1[
* 5.0
Y
XY P
PP
YI
CES Demand• The elasticity of substitution () is equal
to 1/(1-)– when = 0.5, = 2– when = -1, = 0.5
• Because substitutability has declined, these demand functions are less responsive to changes in relative prices
• The CES allows us to illustrate a wide variety of possible relationships
Indirect Utility Function• It is often possible to manipulate first-
order conditions to solve for optimal values of X1,X2,…,Xn
• These optimal values will depend on the prices of all goods and income
•••
X*n = Xn(P1,P2,…,Pn, I)
X*1 = X1(P1,P2,…,Pn,I)
X*2 = X2(P1,P2,…,Pn,I)
Indirect Utility Function• We can use the optimal values of the Xs
to find the indirect utility function
maximum utility = U(X*1,X*2,…,X*n)
• Substituting for each X*i we get
maximum utility = V(P1,P2,…,Pn,I)• The optimal level of utility will depend
indirectly on prices and income– If either prices or income were to change,
the maximum possible utility will change
Indirect Utility in the Cobb-Douglas
• If U = X0.5Y0.5, we know that
xPX
2
I*
YPY
2
I*
•Substituting into the utility function, we get
5050
5050
222 ..
..
utility maximumYXYX PPPP
III
Expenditure Minimization
• Dual minimization problem for utility maximization– allocating income in such a way as to achieve
a given level of utility with the minimal expenditure
– this means that the goal and the constraint have been reversed
Expenditure level E2 provides just enough to reach U1
Expenditure Minimization
Quantity of X
Quantity of Y
U1
Expenditure level E1 is too small to achieve U1
Expenditure level E3 will allow the
individual to reach U1 but is not the
minimal expenditure required to do so
A
• Point A is the solution to the dual problem
Expenditure Minimization• The individual’s problem is to choose
X1,X2,…,Xn to minimize
E = P1X1 + P2X2 +…+PnXn
subject to the constraint
U1 = U(X1,X2,…,Un)
• The optimal amounts of X1,X2,…,Xn will depend on the prices of the goods and the required utility level
Expenditure Function• The expenditure function shows the
minimal expenditures necessary to achieve a given utility level for a particular set of prices
minimal expenditures = E(P1,P2,…,Pn,U)
• The expenditure function and the indirect utility function are inversely related– both depend on market prices but involve
different constraints
Expenditure Function from the Cobb-Douglas
• Minimize E = PXX + PYY subject to U’=X0.5Y0.5 where U’ is the utility target
• The Lagrangian expression is
L = PXX + PYY + (U’ - X0.5Y0.5)
• First-order conditions areL/X = PX - 0.5X-0.5Y0.5 = 0
L/Y = PY - 0.5X0.5Y-0.5 = 0
L/ = U’ - X0.5Y0.5 = 0
Expenditure Function from the Cobb-Douglas
• These first-order conditions imply that
PXX = PYY
• Substituting into the expenditure function:
E = PXX* + PYY* = 2PXX*
Solving for optimal values of X* and Y*:
XP
EX
2*
YP
EY
2*
Expenditure Function from the Cobb-Douglas
• Substituting into the utility function, we can get the indirect utility function
5050
5050
222 ..
..
'YXYX PP
E
P
E
P
EU
•So the expenditure function becomes
E = 2U’PX0.5
PY0.5
Important Points to Note:• To reach a constrained maximum, an
individual should:– spend all available income– choose a commodity bundle such that the
MRS between any two goods is equal to the ratio of the goods’ prices• the individual will equate the ratios of marginal utility
to price for every good that is actually consumed
Important Points to Note:• Tangency conditions are only first-order
conditions– the individual’s indifference map must exhibit
diminishing MRS– the utility function must be strictly quasi-
concave• Tangency conditions must also be modified
to allow for corner solutions– ratio of marginal utility to price will be lower for
goods that are not purchased
Important Points to Note:• The individual’s optimal choices implicitly
depend on the parameters of his budget constraint– choices observed will be implicit functions of
prices and income– utility will also be an indirect function of prices
and income
Important Points to Note:• The dual problem to the constrained utility-
maximization problem is to minimize the expenditure required to reach a given utility target– yields the same optimal solution as the primary
problem– leads to expenditure functions in which
spending is a function of the utility target and prices