chapter 7: language and thought slides prepared by randall e. osborne, texas state university-san...

29
Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University, UK 1

Upload: edward-logan

Post on 18-Jan-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Language and Communication The complex structure of human language: –phoneme –morpheme –phonological rules –grammar –morphological rules –syntactical rules 3

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Chapter 7:Language and

thought

Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos,

adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University, UK

1

Page 2: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Language and Communication: Nothing’s More Personal

2

Page 3: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Language and Communication

The complex structure of human language:– phoneme– morpheme– phonological rules– grammar– morphological rules– syntactical rules

3

Page 4: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Units of Language

4

Page 5: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Syntactical Rules

5

Page 6: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Language Development

• At birth - infants can distinguish all contrasting sounds in human language

• 6 months - can only distinguish those sounds in language being spoken around them

• 4-6 months - begin to babble speech sounds

6

Page 7: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Language Milestones

7

Page 8: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Language Milestones• Fast mapping

– Children can ‘glue’ a word onto a concept after hearing it just once

• Telegraphic speech– Content words only but can convey basic

meaning

• Overgeneralisations– “you eated”, “we ranned”, “he singed all day”

8

Page 9: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Theories of Language Development

• Behaviourist explanations– principles of operant conditioning– learn to talk through reinforcement, shaping, and

extinction– limits:

(1) parents don’t spend much time teaching grammar, (2) children generate more grammatical sentences than

they hear, (3) errors children make do not duplicate what they hear

9

Page 10: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Theories of Language Development

• Nativist explanations– language acquisition

device (LAD)– “wired” to learn grammar– Those with genetic

dysphasia cannot grasp grammar – e.g. the “wug” test

10

Page 11: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Theories of Language Development

• Interactionist explanations– how does innate, biological capacity for

language combine with environmental experience?

– parents tailor verbal interactions with children in ways that simplify language acquisition

– deaf children NOT taught sign language often develop own system of hand signals

11

Page 12: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Theories of Language Development

• Neurological specialisation

– Broca’s area (involved in language production)

– Wernicke’s area (involved in language comprehension)

– Aphasia

12

Page 13: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Theories of Language Development

• Can other species learn human language?• Washoe taught sign language

– learned 160 words– could construct simple sentences– novel constructions– apes can learn signs for concepts they

understand (not abstract)

13

Page 14: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Thought and Language• How are thought and language related?• Linguistic relativity hypothesis

– Inuit: many different words for “snow” is not true

• Language and colour processing• Language and views of time

– forward and backward (time is horizontal)– up and down (time is vertical)

14

Page 15: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Concepts and Categories: How We Think

15

Page 16: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Concepts and Categories• Concept

– fundamental to our ability to think• Category-specific deficits

– damage to front part of left temporal lobe—difficulty identifying humans

– damage to lower left temporal lobe—trouble identifying animals

– damage where temporal and occipital lobes meet —trouble naming tools

16

Page 17: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Concepts and Categories

• Nature of human concepts• Early theories focused on rules• Later theories focused on

“family resemblance”

17

Page 18: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Concepts and Categories

• Rosch’s Prototype theory– “best” example defines the set– Typicality enables categorisation

• Medin & Schaffer’s Exemplar theory– We compare new examples with other stored

examples, and categorise accordingly. – Explains how we can identify specific dogs, not

just prototypical dogs…

18

Page 19: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Judging, Valuing, and Deciding: Sometimes We’re

Logical, Sometimes Not

19

Page 20: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Decision making

• Rational choice theory– likelihood of something happening multiplied

by perceived value of that outcome

• Heuristics• Algorithms

20

Page 21: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Heuristics• Availability bias• Conjunction fallacy

– decreasing probability of all things being true of person

• Representativeness heuristic

• Framing effects• Sunk-cost fallacy

21

Page 22: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Decision making• Prospect theory

– people simplify available information– choose prospect that offers best value (personal)

• Frequency format hypothesis– Our minds evolved to notice how often things

occur, not how likely they are• Decision making and the brain

– Prefrontal lobe damage can create inability to judge risk or decide importance of tasks

22

Page 23: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Problem Solving: Working It Out

23

Page 24: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Problem Solving

• Two major types of problems that complicate our lives:– ill-defined problem (no clear goal or solution)– well-defined problem

• Means-ends analysis• Analogical problem solving

24

Page 25: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Creativity and Insight

• Analogical problem solving does not work for all problems

• Research suggests insight is actually incremental

• Functional fixedness

25

Page 26: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Creativity and InsightWord Association

26

Page 27: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Creativity and InsightAnswers

27

Solutions: •Card, paper, pawn, carpet, ball, bar

Page 28: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Transforming Information: How We Reach Conclusions

28

Page 29: Chapter 7: Language and thought Slides prepared by Randall E. Osborne, Texas State University-San Marcos, adapted by Dr Mark Forshaw, Staffordshire University,

Reaching Conclusions• Reasoning

– practical reasoning– theoretical reasoning

• Belief bias– focus on conclusions instead of arguments– does the answer ‘ring true’?

• Syllogistic reasoning– does conclusion follow from statements we

assume to be true?

29