chapter 24shanahatzopoulos.weebly.com/.../action_research_presentation.pdfsimilarities &...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 24:
Shana Hatzopoulos
Sebrina A. Lindsay-Law
Education 295
Dr. Patricia Johnson
The George Washington University
“Action Research is conducted
by one or more individuals or
groups for the purpose of solving
a problem or obtaining
information in order to inform
local practice.”
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
• Those who use this methodology want to
solve some daily issues, such as:
How to decrease absenteeism;
How to decrease violent incidents;
How to increase parental involvement;
How to increase funding;
How to increase teacher morale.
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
• Instructional
Strategies (best
practices)
• Performance
Assessments
• 21st Century aspects
• Tiered Educational
Strategies
• Professional Learning Communities
• Differentiated Instruction Practices
• Building School Climate and Culture Aspects
• Closing Achievement
Gaps
• is limited in generalizability because it is
more authentic;
• can be effectively implemented if several
schools are examining the same question;
• does not require complete mastery of
research methods;
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
• is necessary if there is a problem;
• has to have participation from all
stakeholders that will be effected by the
outcome of the problem;
“A successful Action Research requires a plan that will allow the
researcher to reflect on the best practice and solution.”
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Address: A Specific Problem in an institution
Purpose: To improve practice and inform larger issues
Participants: Individuals, Teams, and others involved in the problem
Agenda: Focus remains clear and specific- to experience success this type of action research should have an action plan that will be implemented and looked at for continuous improvement.
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Two Purpose: Empower individuals and groups to improve their lives and to bring about social change at some level- school, community, or society.
Empowerment emerges when all stakeholders are on one accord thinking and agreeing on the same strategies, data collection and analysis needs, and interpretation of results.
“PAR is a collaborative approach to research that provides people with the means to take systematic action in an effort to resolve specific problems.”
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Step One: IDENTIFYING the
RESEARCH PROBLEM or
QUESTION• EXAMINE THE SITUATION
• CLARIFYING THE PROBLEM OR ISSUE
• DESIRE TO MAKE SOMETHING BETTER
• WATCH COMPLEX ISSUES
• USUALLY NARROW IN SCOPE; BUT CAN BE LARGE AND LONG TERM WITH PARTICIPATION
• LONG TERM EXAMPLE: PROFESSIONAL
LEARNING COMMUNITIES
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Step Two: GATHERING the
NECESSARY INFORMATION
• HOW DO WE EXAMINE THE PROBLEM- BY GATHERING STUDIES, EXPERIMENTS, SURVEYS, ASSESSMENTS, INTERVIEWS, AND OBSERVATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO FIND THE RIGHT SOLUTION.
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Step Three: ANALYZING and
INTERPRETING the
INFORMATION
• WHAT DOES THE DATA REVEAL TO THE STAKEHOLDERS?
• REFLECT THE PERCEPTIONS OF ALL STAKEHOLDERS.
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Step Four: DEVELOPING an
ACTION PLAN• CREATE A PLAN TO IMPLEMENT CHANGES;
• BASED ON THE FINDINGS DEVELOP POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS;
• FORMAL DOCUMENT SHOULD BE PREPARED BUT NOT REQUIRED;
• STUDY MUST HAVE CLEAR DIRECTIONS AND CRITERIA THAT POINTS BACK TO THE ORIGINAL PROBLEM.
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Similarities & Differences
Action Research
• Systematic Inquiry
• Goal is to solve problems of local concern
• Carried out by teacher or other local education professional
• Uses primarily teacher-developed instruments
• Less rigorous
• Usually value-based
• Purposive samples selected
• Selective opinions of researcher often considered as data
• Generalizability is very limited
Formal Quantitative & Qualitative Research
• Systematic Inquiry
• Goal is to develop and test theories & to produce knowledge
• Considerable training required to conduct such studies
• Intent is to investigate larger issues
• Carried out by researcher who is not usually involved in local situation Uses primarily professionally developed instruments
• More rigorous
• Frequently value-neutral
• Random samples (if possible) preferred
• Selective opinions of researcher never considered as data
• Generalizability often appropriate
Taken from Table 24.2 (Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Sampling in Action Research
• Focus on only a particular group of individuals
– A teacher’s class
– Some of a counselor’s clients
– An administrator’s faculty
• The sample and the population are identical
• Random sampling is not as critical in schools
– Generalizing is not necessarily likely or desired
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Advantages of Action Research
• Action research can be done by almost any professional
• Action research can improve educational practice
• When teachers design their own action research, they can develop more effective ways to practice their craft
• Action research can help teachers identify problems and issues systematically
• Action research can build up a small community of research-oriented individuals with the school
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Practical Application of Action Research
• Investigating the teaching of science concepts by means of a comparison-group experiment
• Studying the effect of time-out on a student’s disruptive behavior by means of a single-subject experiment
• Determining what student like about school by means of a survey
Practical Application of Action Research
• Checking for bias in English anthologies by means of a content analysis
• Predicting which kinds of students are likely to have trouble learning Algebra by means of a correlationalstudy
• Comparing two ways of teaching chemistry by means of a causal-comparative study
• Finding out how music teachers teach by means of an ethnographic study
An Example of Action Research
• Ms. DeMaria’s hypothesis
– Male learning-disabled students in elementary schools who receive a systematic program of relaxation exercises would show a greater reduction in off-task behaviors than student who do not receive such a program of exercise
• Groups that received only 4 weeks of “training” actually showed a deterioration in behavior
• Groups that received 8 weeks of “training” showed a marked decrease in off-task behaviors
A Published Example of Action Research
• The questions was “Will physically and verbally aggressive students solve conflicts in a constructive manner if provided with models of pro-social alternative solutions?”
• Quantitative & Qualitative data was collected
• Students were selected based on observations of difficulty with problem-solving
Data Collection Methods
• Student surveys
• Conflict-Resolution Journals
• Tally Sheets
• Observational Notes
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Findings
• Incidences of physical and verbal aggression decreased from the first to the eighth week
• Students need to be reminded to refer to the “Wheel of Choice” when conflicts arise
• Students did develop the skills to use more positive strategies for solving conflicts
• Students need time and practice to change negative conflict management habits
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Summary of the Nature of Action Research
• Action research is conducted by a teacher, administrator, or other education professional to solve a problem at the local level
• Each of the specific methods of research can be used
• A given research question may be investigated by any one of several methods
• Some methods are more appropriate to a particular question or setting
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
Assumptions Underlying Action Research
• Participants have the authority to:
– Make decisions
– Improve their practice
– Be committed to continual professional development
– Engage in systematic inquiry
(Fraenkel and Wallen, 2009)
References
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Crotty, Y. (Producer). (2008). Action research made simple. [Web]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg83f72_6Gw&feature=channel