chapter five - jica · 2007. 2. 22. · chapter five cala east-west national road project 5-1 5....

CHAPTER FIVE CALA East-West National Road Project

5-1

5. RELOCATION AND RESETTLEMENT PLAN

5.1 Scope of Displacement and Resettlement The PAPs to be displaced and resettled on account of occupying rented land, legally or illegally, are in total, 395 (NS -266; Daang Hari-129, and CALA Expressway -0). Included in this figure are respondents whose land tenure status could not be ascertained at the time of survey. However, the eligibility of these PAPs for socialized housing will also be verified during project disclosure when their status as property owners (meaning that they have no real estate property elsewhere in the Philippines and their household income is below poverty level) will have been validated. Table 5-1 provides a brief overview of the land tenure status of the affected persons. In as much as resettlement will be the responsibility of the concerned LGUs, DPWH will assist and coordinate the work with LGUs and National Housing Authority(NHA), which is mandated to arrange resettlement of informal dwellers affected by development projects. Among the affected municipalities, Bacoor has the biggest resettlement requirement (Table 5-2). Unfortunately, the municipality has no government land available.

Table 5-2 Resettlement Requirements per Municipality

Road Project

Municipality Number to be

Resettled

NS-1 Bacoor 238

NS-3 Bacoor 3

Imus 7

NS-4 Dasmariñas 13

NS-5 Dasmariñas 5

DH-2 Munitinlupa City 111

DH-4 Imus 12

General Trias 6

Tanza 0

CE-2 Silang 0

Total 395

5.2 Relocation Choices The RAP contains several relocation options. These include: (i) Balik-probinsya where PAPs will be given financial assistance to return to their respective provinces; (ii) Financial compensation equivalent to replacement value of structures (that is, without deducting depreciation and salvage value). In this alternative, the PAP will be responsible for finding their own residential area. In other words, they will manage their own resettlement – i.e., “self-relocated”; and (iii) Relocation to available government resettlement areas or within private socialized housing developments by NHA. The PAP will pay the cost of developed land through an extended amortization scheme through the HDMF-Community Mortgage Program or the NHA. During disclosure of the Draft RAP, the PAPs will indicate their choices.

535

CH

AP

TE

R F

IVE

C

AL

A E

ast

-West

Na

tio

nal

Ro

ad

Pro

ject

5-2

Ta

ble

5-1

L

an

d T

en

ure

Sta

tus

of

PA

Ps

Ten

ure

Mu

nic

ipality

/ B

ara

ng

ay

No

. o

f S

tru

ctu

res

Ow

n

Land

&

House

Rent

Land

&

House

Rent

Land

/Ow

n

House

Ille

ga

l O

ccupancy

& O

wn

House

Uncert

ain

Sub-

Tota

l N

o

Answ

er

Tota

l

NO

RT

H-S

OU

TH

RO

AD

423

61

86

31

152

83

413

10

423

NS

-1

331

586

25

143

70

329

2331

Baco

or

331

586

25

143

70

329

2331

Tala

ba II

91

566

20

91

91

Tala

ba III

67

20

1

45

66

167

Tala

ba V

II

28

4

24

28

28

Zapote

V

145

143

1144

1145

NS

-3

27

17

01

36

27

027

Baco

or

13

10

00

30

13

013

Mam

bog III

11

8

3

11

11

Mam

bog IV

2

2

2

2

Imu

s

14

70

1

06

14

014

Buh

ay n

a T

ubig

7

6

1

7

7

Ana

bu I-G

7

1

67

7

NS

-4

41

20

00

67

33

841

Dasm

ari

na

s

41

20

00

67

33

841

Salit

ran I

13

12

12

113

Salit

ran II

5

3

14

15

San A

gustin

II

23

5

6

617

623

NS

-5

24

19

05

00

24

024

Dasm

ari

na

s

24

19

05

00

24

024

San A

gustin

II

24

19

5

24

24

536

CH

AP

TE

R F

IVE

C

AL

A E

ast

-West

Hig

hw

ay

Pro

ject

5-3

Ta

ble

5-1

Lan

d T

en

ure

Sta

tus

of

PA

Ps

(c

on

’t)

Ten

ure

Mu

nic

ipality

/ B

ara

ng

ay

No

. o

f S

tru

ctu

res

Ow

n

Land

&

House

Rent

Land

&

House

Rent

Land

/Ow

n

House

Ille

ga

l O

ccupancy

& O

wn

House

Uncert

ain

Sub-

Tota

l N

o

Answ

er

Tota

l

EA

ST

-WE

ST

RO

AD

172

32

13

6120

162

10

172

DH

-2

112

00

0

0111

111

1112

Mu

nti

nlu

pa C

ity

112

00

0

0111

111

1112

Pob

lacio

n

112

111

111

1112

DH

-4

60

32

13

69

51

960

Imu

s

44

25

03

63

37

744

Mala

gasa

ng I

I-B

7

3

14

37

Mala

gasa

ng I

I-C

37

22

3

62

33

437

Gen

era

l T

rias

13

70

0

06

13

013

Pason

g C

am

achile

I

2

22

2

Pason

g C

am

achile

II

1

1

1

1

Pin

agtip

una

n

10

6

410

10

Ta

nza

3

01

0

00

12

3

Sanja

majo

r 3

1

1

23

CA

LA

EX

PR

ES

SW

AY

10

10

00

00

10

010

CE

-2

10

10

00

00

10

010

Silan

g

10

10

00

00

10

010

Sab

uta

n

10

10

10

10

To

tal

605

103

87

34

158

203

585

20

605

537

CHAPTER FIVE CALA East-West Highway Project

5-4

According to the NHA there are two (2) available sites in the area within or near the study area, namely the NHA-NAIC Resettlement Project, Phases 1 and 2, and the Calauan Resettlement Project in Laguna. The former, in Naic, Cavite, was acquired for the intention of relocating families to be affected by the clearing of Metro Manila esteros, creeks and riverbanks. The Calauan Project in Laguna has more than 7,000 units available but is still awaiting the NHA Area Management Office’s recommendations for its disposal or allocation (Table 5-3).

Table 5-3 Inventory of National Housing Authority Resettlement Projects

Resettlement Project

LocationTotal No. of Units

Balance Remarks

NHA-NAIC Resettlement Project Phase 1 & 2

Cavite 12,000 12,000

Earmarked for PAPs of Metro Manila

estero/riverbank clearing

Calauan Resettlement Project (Phase 2 & 3)

Laguna 7,724 7,724

Awaiting advice of AMO re: disposition/ utilization

Within the municipalities are privately developed socialized housing projects that may be tapped as alternative relocation. The NHA has used this option in its relocation projects in the municipalities of Rodriguez and Tanza. Table 5.4 contains an inventory of socialized housing projects. Availability and costs of the above socialized housing projects will still have to be done.

5.3 Resettlement Assistance Where relocation is required, compensation for land to the lot owner will be given. The receiving LGU (i.e., the LGU under whose political jurisdiction the relocation site is located) may apply for assistance with DPWH for the provision of basic services, such as streetlights and improved access road, for the community where the relocation site is to be constructed. 5.4 Gender Planning The Project needs also to take into account the needs of 74 female-headed households and vulnerable groups that have been identified in the project as shown in the table below.

North-SouthRoad

East-West Road

Cavite-Laguna Expressway

Total of 3 Alignments Social and Environmental

Concerns on New Roads *

No. % No. % No. % No. %

Women and vulnerable groups 61 2.00 17 2.06 1 1.72 79 2.00

Additional data processing and FGD have to be undertaken in order to determine their specific concerns, including, older persons, people with disability and to identify their socio-economic profile and needs.

538

CH

AP

TE

R F

IVE

C

AL

A E

ast

-West

Hig

hw

ay

Pro

ject

5-5

Ta

ble

5-4

In

ve

nto

ry o

f S

oc

ialize

d H

ou

sin

g P

roje

cts

L

oc

ati

on

N

am

e &

Ad

dre

ss o

f O

wn

er

La

nd

A

rea

(Has.)

Lo

t O

nly

or

Ho

use &

Lo

t N

o. o

f U

nit

s

1

GM

A V

illa

ge

Bg

y.

Pob

lacio

n 5

, G

MA

, C

avite

A.J

. Le

desm

a C

onstr

uctio

n C

orp

. 5.3

902

H&

L

715

V

ale

ro T

ow

er

122 V

ale

ro S

t.,

Makati

2

San A

gustin

e H

om

es

Bg

y.

Pason

g K

aw

aya

n

LG

TM

Corp

. 0.7

871

H&

L

112

Gen. T

rias, C

avite

3

Ciu

dad V

erd

e H

om

es P

h.

1

Bg

y.

Para

daha

n

SO

GO

Rea

lty &

De

vt. C

orp

97.0

000

HH

&L

405

Tanza, C

avite

4

Para

mount H

om

es

Gen, T

rias, C

avite

UC

PB

-AC

M P

rop.

Ventu

res, In

c.

0.3

480

H&

L

87

5

Gre

en R

oya

l F

arm

B

gy.

Pulo

ng

Bung

a

Sila

ng, C

avite

Bill

rock C

onstr

uctio

n E

nte

rprises

1.6

415

L

60

6

Sto

. R

osari

o V

illa

ges

Bg

y.

Pason

g K

aw

aya

n

Sto

. R

osari

o L

and &

Pro

pert

y C

orp

. 5.0

744

70

Gen, T

rias, C

avite

Am

adeo/G

en. T

rias, C

avite

7

Belv

edere

To

wn

e II

Tanza, C

avite

Fili

nvest L

and,

Inc.

3.7

000

8

Vill

a L

ore

nzo S

ub

d. P

hase I

V

Bg

ys.

Mu

law

in &

Am

aya

Prim

e P

eak p

ropert

ies, Ltd

. In

c.

21.0

957

H&

L

806

Tanza, C

avite

Pre

stig

e T

ow

er,

Em

era

ld A

ve.

Pasig

9

Vis

ta R

ica V

illage

5.0

000

L

196

10

San R

afa

el V

illag

e II-

A

3.9

000

H&

L

231

11

Morn

ing S

un V

illa

ge

1.2

000

L

57

12

Tahanang

Yam

an H

om

es

Bg

y.

Bue

na

vis

ta

Tahanang

Yam

an H

om

es C

orp

. 0.9

700

158

Gen. T

rias

2nd F

lr., C

SP

Bld

g.

173 E

DS

A,

Ma

nda

luyo

ng

539


5-6

5.5 Provision of Social Infrastructures The affected LGUs, except Bacoor should be able to accommodate the PAPs to be relocated within their respective jurisdictions. Within General Trias and Tanza are sizable privately owned socialized housing sites. Arrangements with local public elementary and high schools should be done to accommodate the displaced school children. Additional health centers may have to be established. 5.6 Income/Livelihood Restoration Program

A total of 192 respondents, equivalent to 31.9% of PAPs, indicated their concerns for the loss of work and livelihood resulting from the project.

North-South

Road East-West

Road Cavite-Laguna

Expressway Total of 3

AlignmentsPerceived Negative Impacts

No. % No. % No. % No. %

Loss of work 28 6.62 16 9.30 0 0 44 7.27

Loss of livelihood 26 6.15 26 15.12 0 0 52 8.60

Total 54 12.77 42 24.42 0 0 96 15.87

Total Respondents 423 100.00 172 100.00 10 100.00 605 100.00

Source: Household Inventory Survey conducted by the Feasibility Study on the Implementation Support on the Cavite-Laguna (CALA) East-West National Road Project

Income restoration will be programmed for the 216 PAPs from Bacoor who will be resettled in another municipality. With the assistance of the host LGU, the resettlers will be given priority in Small Enterprise Assistance (SEA-K) Pangkabuhayan initiative of the DSWD. Women who are household heads and out of school youth will be given priority in the SEA-K assistance. Training will be provided in vocational trades to men and women. This will be developed in conjunction with the local labor department and industries, coordinated by the host LGU, and addressed by the Municipal Social Welfare Department. A survey of LGU livelihood assistance programs should be conducted so that the affected PAPs and their respective barangays will be adopted. In Barangay Biga II, Silang Cavite where the NS road will require the widening of the Aguinaldo Highway, the affected barangay officials raised their concerns on the loss of their livelihood. (FGD with Barangay Officials and residents of Barangay Biga II, Silang Cavite, held on 16 December 2005 at Barangay Biga II-Barangay Captain’s residence). Loss of farmland in rural areas where agriculture remains the primary source of income, will, likewise, disturb sources of livelihood and work. Tenants also expressed their concerns in FGDs where they raised their concerns that compensation will be paid to the land owners who, in turn, will be responsible for compensating tenants for disturbances caused by the project. These costs have already been included in the income losses of all households interviewed (See Section 4.8). The guidelines however, provide a minimum of P15,000/ha for tenants and farmers in addition to P6,000/month equivalent minimum wage for tenants and farmers.

540


5-7

Cavite Provincial Livelihood Program PAPs needing livelihood assistance can also avail of the livelihood assistance program being sponsored by the Cavite provincial government. The newly formed Entrepreneurial Development Division (under the Office of Economic Opportunity) or OEO-EDD, has on-going livelihood projects among different indigent groups. The head of this division maintained that PAPs or, more specifically, informal dwellers that would be resettled within the province of Cavite are entitled to this program1. Even before PAPs are resettled, resource mapping and skills inventory will be coordinated with the appropriate agents to determine the kind of projects or livelihood activities that are feasible.

The Livelihood Program offers assistance in four (4) phases:

• Skills Training

• Micro Financing (P5,000-20,000 for the first cycle at 6 months per cycle; up to 10 cycles allowed per individual

• Product Development and Packaging

• Promotions and Marketing Assistance

The Grameen Bank “model” of Bangladesh has been adopted as its financing scheme, wherein a group is collectively held accountable for each individual’s loan. Reporting a 100% success rate in terms of loan repayment, the OEO-EDD reports that, at present, a revolving fund of P24 million is being released via two (2) private financing partner-institutions. A budget of P15,000 per affected PAP or P3.9 million will be allocated by this project for livelihood assistance. Additional livelihood assistance will be provided for an additional 158 PAPs who raised this concern. Another P2.37 million will be allocated in the ROW acquisition budget. 5.7 Re-establishing Common Property Resources Four barangay halls located in Talaba 2, Talaba 7, Buhay na Tubig and Salitran 4 will be affected. There is also a day care center at Buhay na Tubig those structures will be replaced after a relocation site has been found. 5.8 Resettlement Costs An initial estimate of the costs of ROW acquisition and resettlement has been derived from the results of the household survey. These estimates can be improved with the completion of cadastral survey of affected lands. In this project, DPWH will be responsible for the ROW acquisition cost. The foreign assistance for the construction of the project will be contingent upon ROW acquisition and resettlement of the affected persons. The resettlement budget and costs are presented in Table 5-5. This includes costs for land acquisition and development for a resettlement site and basic services, cash

1 Interview with Ms. Meng Yaun, OEO-EDD Head, December 2005

541


5-8

compensation requirement for specific categories of losses, social services/training and livelihood. The total cost for resettling the 395 PAPs is P101.6 million.

Table 5-5 Cost of Resettlement

Item Unit Total (PhP)

1. Land Acquisition and development

Land acquisition

P300/sq.m 9,954,000

Development of land

P 600/sq.m 19,908,000

Construction of basic amenities

Lump sum 5,000,000

2. Housing construction 144,000 56,880,000

3. Cost of relocation and transfer

10,000 3,950,000

4. Livelihood assistance and skills training

15,000 5,925,000

Total Resettlement Cost

101,617,000

The assumptions used in the preparation of the resettlement costs are present in the following table (Table 5-6). The total cost per unit/household is P219,600..

Table 5-6 Resettlement Costs per Unit/Household

Design Assumptions Unit Total Cost (Php)

Lot per unit 70 sq.m. 27,650 sq.m. 8,295,000

Roads and open space 20% 5,530 sq.m. 1,659,000

Land Development 33,180 sq.m. 19,908,000

Housing area/unit 24 sq.m. 9,480sq.m.

P6,000 unit cost/sq.m.

P144,000 56,880,000

Total 86,742,000

Unit Cost Per PAP P 219,600

5.9 Land Acquisition and Resettlement Costs The total costs for land acquisition for ROW and resettlement costs for the project is P 1,139.65 million (Table 5-7). The estimates are still preliminary as the costs for commercial/industrial structures are not included.

542


5-9

Table 5-7 Total Estimated Costs for Land and Resettlement

Item Cost/ Peso in Million

Land Acquisition for ROW (Table 4.17)

P 1,038.03

Resettlement (Table 5-5)

P 101.62

TOTAL P 1,139.65

The costs estimates are in current prices. Since the implementation of the project will take several years, the costs should be indexed annually during implementation.

543

CHAPTER SIX CALA East-West National Road Project

6-1

6. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION & RAP IMPLEMENTATION

FRAMEWORK

6.1 Disclosure and Consultation with PAPs As soon as the road alignments are determined and approved during the detailed design phase of this project, project disclosure will be undertaken. This will consist of written letters to owners and occupants of properties that will be affected by the road projects, followed by an information drive presenting the financial and material entitlements of PAPs. Meanwhile, DPWH has already conducted eight (8) stakeholders meetings involving all levels of stakeholders. The last two stakeholders’ meetings centered on the RAP for feedback from stakeholders. The stakeholders’ meetings were held at the municipality level to involve more affected persons in the deliberation process. Details concerning the stakeholders’ meetings held so far are available at the project website (www. cala-ew.info). The website was created with the aim to make project studies available to the stakeholders and other concerned. 6.2 Steps Taken to Enhance Community Participation As indicated earlier, project information has been widely disseminated through a series of stakeholders’ meetings. In addition, open discussions in such venues have been instrumental in gathering stakeholders’ feedbacks, issues and concerns. The participants of the early stakeholders’ meetings were mainly governmental officials from concerned LGUs and large property owners/developers while residential-level stakeholders were made to actively participate in later discussions/meetings (i.e., 7th and 8th meetings). Likewise, to broadly cover residential-level stakeholders and to obtain their consensus on the project implementation, barangay consultations were conducted for all potential project-affected barangays along the proposed road alignments by means of the Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). These were attended by the barangay captains and councilors, project-affected persons including potential residents to be relocated by the proposed project, people’s organizations (PO), and non-governmental organizations (NGO). These barangay consultations were conducted in a total of 58 barangays, consisting of 49 barangays in Cavite Province, 7 barangays in Laguna Province and 2 barangays in Muntinlupa City of Metro Manila. In the barangay consultation, outline of the proposed project was explained by a DPWH officer and local social expert hired by the JICA Study Team as well as coordination of the social surveys (see Figure 6.1). Sample of some issues and concerns raised by the participants are shown in Table 6.1.

Table 6.1 Some Issues and Concerns Raised in the Barangay Consultations

• Is the alignment final?

• Will there be compensation for affected assets? When?

• Is there a ready relocation site?

• How will existing business establishment be compensated?

• Will there be alternative income source in the relocation site?

• What documents are needed as proof of ownership?

545


6-2

After the barangay consultations, concerned barangays were requested to issue a resolution endorsing the acceptance of the proposed projects. Subsequent to the issuance of barangay resolutions, concerned municipal governments as well as provincial governments were also requested to issue their respective resolutions endorsing the barangay resolutions. Sample resolutions issued by a barangay and a municipality are shown in Figure 6.2. In terms of acceptability, all barangays, three of the eight municipalities and both provinces have already issued their resolutions.

Figure 6.1 Barangay Consultations and Issuance of Resolution by LGUs

Barangay Consultation for each BarangayAgenda:

- Outline of the proposed projects

- Proposed alternative road alignments

- Coordination of social surveys

- Q&A (discussion)

BarangayAcceptance of the project

by Barangay

Endorsement of the project by

Municipality

Barangay

Barangay

Barangay

Barangay

Barangay


Province

Acceptance of the project

by BarangayAcceptance of the project

by Barangay

Municipality

DPWHDPWH

Province

Participants:

- Barangay captains and councilors

- Project-affected persons

- Residents

- Peoples organizations (PO)

- Non-governmental organizations (NGO)

Municipality

Barangay

Barangay

Barangay

Municipality

Province

Barangay Consultation for each BarangayAgenda:

- Outline of the proposed projects

- Proposed alternative road alignments

- Coordination of social surveys

- Q&A (discussion)

BarangayAcceptance of the project

by Barangay


Municipality

Barangay

Barangay

Barangay

Barangay

Barangay


Province

Acceptance of the project

by BarangayAcceptance of the project

by Barangay

Municipality

DPWHDPWHDPWHDPWH

Province

Participants:

- Barangay captains and councilors

- Project-affected persons

- Residents

- Peoples organizations (PO)

- Non-governmental organizations (NGO)

Municipality

Barangay

Barangay

Barangay

MunicipalityMunicipality

ProvinceProvince

Figure 6.2 Sample Resolutions Issued by LGUs

• Resolution of Barangay

– Talaba III, Bacoor, Cavite

• Resolution of Municipality

– General Trias, Cavite

546


6-3

For the households who may be indirectly and directly affected by the proposed project, intentions and opinions on the proposed project were directly inquired through the perception survey and household inventory survey for resettlement, respectively, as shown in the previous chapters. Appropriateness of the consensus building process for implementation of the proposed projects were confirmed after explanation of the process taken so far, in the 5th Stakeholders’ Meetings held in Laguna on 14 March 2006 and in Cavite on 15 March 2006 as well as the 4th Steering Committee Meeting on 20 March 2006.

Figure 6.3 Consensus Building Processes in Stakeholders Meetings

5th Stakeholder Meeting�Confirmation of the consensus building process

Focus Group Discussion (Barangay Consultation)�Agenda: Outline of the proposed projects, Proposed alternative road alignments,

Coordination on social surveys, Q&A (discussion)�Participants: Barangay captains and councilors, Project-affected persons, Residents,

Peoples organizations (PO), Non-governmental organizations (NGO)�Acceptance of the project by Barangay

=>Endorsement of the Acceptance of the Project by Municipalities and Provinces

Perception Survey�Sampled households from project-affected barangays

Household Interview Survey for Resettlement�All households to potentially be resettled

�Incl. questions on perception of the project

5th Stakeholder Meeting�Confirmation of the consensus building process

Focus Group Discussion (Barangay Consultation)�Agenda: Outline of the proposed projects, Proposed alternative road alignments,

Coordination on social surveys, Q&A (discussion)�Participants: Barangay captains and councilors, Project-affected persons, Residents,

Peoples organizations (PO), Non-governmental organizations (NGO)�Acceptance of the project by Barangay

=>Endorsement of the Acceptance of the Project by Municipalities and Provinces

Perception Survey�Sampled households from project-affected barangays

Household Interview Survey for Resettlement�All households to potentially be resettled

�Incl. questions on perception of the project

In order to further promote community participation, focus group discussions (FGDs) should be held separately per barangay for males, females and youth members of affected households, senior citizens and people with disability. This should continue during the design phase, relocation/transfer and resettlement of the affected persons. 6.3 Resettlement Organization and Framework The proposed institutional arrangements aim to ensure effective and timely design, planning, consultation and implementation of compensation and resettlement. DPWH will ensure effective coordination with relevant agencies for the implementation of the resettlement plan. The successful implementation of the RAP greatly depends on the commitment of and the systematic coordination among the different agencies. The responsibilities of each agency are established below.

547


6-4

Role of DPWH:

(1) Decide and approve the final alignment of the ROW (2) Delineate the road boundary and the individual lots along the ROW via a

parcellary survey. (3) Secure budget for the acquisition and payment of the lots (4) Design and construct, by itself or through contractors, the project (5) Undertake the relocation of affected utilities

Cavite and Laguna Provinces

(1) Orchestrate the timely realization of the project (2) Provide support to their respective LGUs in fulfilling their obligations on

relocation and resettlement (3) Assist in the relocation needs of the LGUs

Local Government Units LGUs in Bacoor, Imus, Dasmariñas, Silang, General Trias, Tanza, Muntinlupa City and Santa Rosa City will:

(1) Secure the ROW from further encroachment and occupation/use. (2) Take the lead in determining the fair and just compensation of the

affected property, including the improvements thereof (3) Negotiate and persuade land owners to participate in the project (4) Make an inventory of and assist the informal dwellers in relocation (5) Organize local resettlement and ROW acquisition committees (6) Undertake community preparation to include consultation, information

dissemination (7) Prepare and finalize master list of households for resettlement (8) Assist DPWH in dismantling of structures and relocation of families (9) Prepare a rehabilitation, social integration program for resettlers (10) Ensure the peaceful and orderly procedures for relocation (11) Ensure the absorption of displaced school children in local schools

DPWH- Environmental and Social Services Office (ESSO) The ESSO will provide technical guidance and support in the implementation of the RAP and will be responsible for the following resettlement activities:

(1) Overseeing the RAP implementation (2) Submission of RAP budget plans (to include compensation, relocation

costs, operation) for approval of allocation of needed resources by DPWH central office;

(3) Ensuring the availability of funds and the proper accounting of expenses;

(4) In accordance with the Department’s resettlement policies, guiding the RAP Implementation Committees (RICs) in their tasks, such as the verification of PAPs, final inventory of affected assets, and information dissemination;

548


6-5

(5) Amending or complementing the RAP in case problems are identified during the internal and/or external monitoring of its implementation;

(6) In collaboration with its counterpart in the region, following-up with concerned DPWH Regional Office the processing of compensation claims of PAPs;

(7) In collaboration with its regional and district counterparts, monitoring the actual payment of compensation to PAPs; and

(8) In collaboration with its regional counterpart, preparing periodic supervision and monitoring reports on RAP implementation for submission to PMO and the funding institution.

DPWH- Regional and District Engineering Offices Successful implementation of the RAP will require close coordination with the Regional Office, especially the District Engineering Office (DEO). The DEO will be the principal and regular representative of DPWH in the RICs. However, the Regional Office will be the ESSO’s principal link with the District. Together with the ESSO at the Central Office, the regional counterpart will extend technical support to the District in relation to RAP implementation. RAP Implementation Committee (RIC) The RIC will be set up and will be composed of the following members:

(1) Representative of the Municipal Government (2) Representative of the PAPs (3) A senior member of the staff of DPWH District Engineering Office -ESS

staff (4) Representative of the concerned Barangay Government (5) Representative from an NGO or people’s organization (PO)

One of the important functions of the RIC would be to deal with any dispute or grievances arising out of RAP implementation. Grievances Redressal Procedures DPWH has established procedures for dealing with disputes and grievances with regard to compensation and other resettlement benefits. Grievances that pertain to valuation of affected assets will be referred to an independent land appraiser or filed with the proper courts. All other grievances will be acted upon by the Resettlement Implementation Committee. If no agreement or amicable solution can be reached, the complainant can appeal to the Office of the DPWH Regional Director, through the ESSO. If still not satisfied with the decision or action of the DPWH Regional Director, the complainant can submit the complaint to the proper courts. The MRIC and the DPWH Regional Director are required to act on these complaints within fifteen (15) days. The complainant is exempted from any administrative or legal fee. The grievance procedures will also be explained to the PAPs through FGDs to be conducted during next detailed design period by ESSO prior to land acquisition and resettlement.

549


6-6

Steering Committee of Project Implementation The following are the tasks of the Steering Committee

(1) Orchestrate the input and activities of the project (2) Establish linkage with other entities, particularly the DSWD and DTI,

and NHA for successful resettlement and ROW payment operations and provide the framework for collaboration

(3) Identify/recommend areas needing national government intervention Taskforce on the ROW Acquisition

(1) Coordinate the land acquisition on the ROW (2) Coordinate the inventory of assets (land and structure) that will be

affected by the project (3) Coordinate with the appraiser on the valuation of land and structure (4) Coordinate the arrangement for the mode and financing of the ROW (5) Conduct consultation with PAPs and land owners/developers on ROW

plan and relocation (6) Identify and make arrangements for the development of sites for

relocation, if any (7) Report development and progress of the project to the Steering

Committee The final RAP to be prepared during the detailed design stage will further update the consultation aspects and establish plan for further disclosure and consultation during the implementation phase.

550

CHAPTER SEVEN CALA East-West National Road Project

7-1

7. MONITORING AND EVALUATION

7.1 Need for Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) are critical activities in resettlement in order to ameliorate problems faced by the PAPs and develop solutions immediately. Monitoring is a periodic assessment of planned activities providing midway inputs, facilitates changes and gives necessary feedback of activities and the directions on which they are going, whereas evaluation is a summing up activity at the end of the project assessing whether the activities have actually achieved their intended goals and purposes. Thus, the M&E mechanism will measure project performance and fulfillment of the project objectives. 7.2 Orientation and Training for Monitoring To ensure that resettlement implementation is being undertaken in accordance with the RAP, a system of internal and external monitoring will be established as soon as the project is approved and ready for implementation. The Environmental and Social Service Office (ESSO) of DPWH will plan and conduct orientation and training seminars for regional and district officers on the implementation processes. The DPWH-DEO, with assistance from the ESSO, will mobilize and organize the Municipal RAP Implementing Committee (MRIC) composed of the DPWH-DE and the respective municipal mayor as chair and co-chair respectively. Representatives of the Barangay Captains, PAPs and non-government organizations (NGOs), if any, are included in the MRIC. The MRIC members are then oriented by the ESSO and the DEO on their roles and responsibilities:

• Validation of bona fide PAPs and inventory of assets affected and supporting documents for the claims

• Conduct of public relations activities

• Resolution of complaints through a grievance mechanism

• Payment of PAPs

• Transfer of PAPs

• Clearing of sites at least one month prior to awarding of contract(s)

• Turnover of cleared sites to Contractor

• Submission of terminal report

The DE will coordinate with the LGU and the National Housing Authority in case relocation sites will be required by the landless PAPs. If relocation to a distant area will be necessary, the DE will coordinate with the appropriate government agencies for training and livelihood assistance to those PAPs who need to change their means of livelihood in their new location. The RAP processes and monitoring activities are presented in Figure 7.1.

551

CH

AP

TE

R S

EV

EN

C

AL

A E

ast

-West

Na

tio

nal

Ro

ad

Pro

ject

7-2

Fig

ure

7-1

R

AP

Pro

cesses a

nd

Mo

nit

ori

ng

Ag

en

cie

s

MR

IC

OR

IEN

TA

TIO

N O

F

RD

, D

EO

s A

ND

LG

Us

FO

RM

AT

ION

AN

D

TR

AIN

ING

OF

MR

ICS

VA

LID

AT

ION

OF

PA

PS

AN

D A

SS

ET

INV

EN

TO

RY

,

VA

LU

AT

ION

AN

D

DO

CU

ME

NT

AT

ION

Ap

pro

ved

/

Co

ncu

rred

RA

P

MO

A

GR

IEV

AN

CE

PR

OC

ES

S

ES

SO

E

SS

O

MR

IC

CO

MP

LA

INT

SY

ES

PA

YM

EN

T O

F

PA

PS

TR

AN

SF

ER

OF

PA

PS

SIT

E

CL

EA

RIN

G

MR

ICD

E

FU

ND

RE

LE

AS

E

PR

OC

ES

S

TU

RN

OV

ER

OF

SIT

E T

O

CO

NT

RA

CT

OR

TE

RM

INA

L

RE

PO

RT

DE

DE

MR

IC

552


7-3

7.3 Two-Tier Monitoring Systems The monitoring mechanism will have a two-tier system at the EA level – (i) internal monitoring and (ii) external monitoring. The vital tasks for internal monitoring will include:

� Status of land acquisition and payments on land compensation � Assessment of the disbursement of compensation procedure � Appraisal of the grievance procedure � PAPs reaction/ satisfaction with the entitlements, compensation etc. � Assessment of the resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impact and

sustainability, drawing lessons for future policy implementation, formulation and planning.

The internal monitoring component will be undertaken by the ESSO with assistance from MRIC. 7.4 External Monitoring External monitoring will be contracted to a local expert or firm. This will be tendered as soon as the RAP has been approved. The external monitor is expected to provide an independent periodic assessment of RAP implementation and impacts to verify internal monitoring and to suggest adjustment of delivery mechanisms and procedures as required. The external monitoring will be carried out for the entire project and will be responsible for the overall monitoring of the RAP implementation. The external monitoring will be carried out every six months during the RAP implementation. The key tasks during external monitoring will include:

• Review and verify the internal monitoring reports prepared by ESSO;

• Review of socio-economic baseline census information of pre-displaced persons;

• Identification and selection of impact indicators;

• Impact assessment through formal and informal surveys with the affected persons;

• Consultation with PAPs, officials, community leaders for preparing review report;

• Assess the resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability.

The following should be considered as the basis for indicators in monitoring and evaluation of the project: (i) socio-economic conditions of the PAPs in the post-resettlement period; (ii) communication and reactions from PAPs on entitlements, compensation, options, alternative developments and relocation timetables, etc.; (iii) changes in housing and income levels; (iv) rehabilitation of informal settlers; (v) valuation of property; (vi) grievance procedures; (vii) disbursement of compensation; and (viii) level of satisfaction of PAPs in the post resettlement period. The external monitoring reports should be sent to the EA and the funding agencies for review and further mitigative actions, if necessary.

553


7-4

7.5 Reporting Requirements and Formats The ESSO will submit quarterly internal monitoring reports to the Project Director/IOs on the status of RAP implementation. The EA will prepare a post-construction evaluation report on the resettlement process and detail the extent to which the compensation paid and other measures have enabled PAPs to maintain or enhance their pre-project social and economic living conditions. For monitoring purposes, the following forms may be used with modifications as appropriate. 1. Report on Project Effectiveness

Performance Indicator Project Objectives and

Targets

Outputs Attained

Inputs Provided At Project

Start As of Date

Source of Data

Submitted by:

Reviewed by: Approved by:

Date:

2. The Activity Plan

Activity Description Outputs Duration Budget Assignees Resource Requirements

Submitted by:


Date:

554


7-5

3. Bar Chart: Status Report

For the period:_____________________

Month Activity Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Variance Explanation

Actions Taken Recommendations

Submitted by:


Date

Actual

Planned

4. Budget Variance Report

For the period:______________________

Activity Description Budget Expenditures Variance Explanation

Submitted by:


Date:

555


7-6

5. Personnel Report

For the period:______________________

Personnel Authorized Existing Personnel Variance Explanation

Actions Taken

Recommendations

Submitted by:


Date:

6. Data and Documentation – Checklist

For the period:______________________

Document Data Available Date of Data Level of

Disaggregation

Actions Taken:

Recommendations:

Submitted by:


Date:

7. Monitoring Project Efficiency

Strengths Recommendations

Weaknesses

Submitted by:


Date:

556


7-7

Level of Adequacy Project Management

0 1 2 3 4 5

Recommendations For Improvement

Planning

Long range planning

Action planning

Contingency planning

Directing

Internal systems and procedures

Walking around

Delegation

Organizing

Organizational structure

People: Teamwork and cooperation

Liaison with other agencies

Rapport with PAPs

Decision-making

Authorities

Problem identification

Problem solving

Communicating skills

Conduct of regular group meetings

Conduct of public assemblies

Internal correspondence

External correspondence

One-on-one meetings

Information-sharing

Personnel Management

Recruitment and selection of project personnel based on qualifications

Knowledge of individual duties and responsibilities

Reasonableness and appropriateness of assignments according to one’s knowledge and skills

Feedback on individual performance

System of promotion

Compensation and incentives

Time Management

Reasonableness of deadlines

Timely performance of activities

Use of time

Timekeeping

Resource Management

Adequacy of resources

Timeliness of resources

System of requisition

557

1

Annex 1 No. of Respondents by Barangay and Type of Roof

Type of Roof Segment/Municipality/

Barangay GI Sheets

Tiles Nipa/

CogonOthers

No Data

Total

NORTH - SOUTH (P) 323 7 - 50 40 420

NS 1 268 6 - 49 36 359

Bacoor

Brgy. Talaba 2 89 - - - 5 94

Brgy. Talaba 3 60 6 - - 3 69

Brgy. Talaba 7 26 - - 1 10 37

Brgy. Zapote 5 Bacoor 93 - - 48 18 159

NS 2 11 - - - - 11

Imus

Brgy. Buhay na Tubig 11 - - - - 11

NS 4 44 1 - 1 4 50

Dasmariñas

Brgy. Burol Main 6 - - - 2 8

Brgy. Salitran 1 12 - - 1 - 13

Brgy. Salitran 2 3 1 - - 1 5

Brgy. San Agustin 2 23 - - - 1 24

NORTH - SOUTH (W) 275 9 1 - 7 292

NS 5 275 9 1 - 7 292

Dasmariñas 268 4 - - 6 278

Brgy. Sampaloc 1 40 - - - - 40

Brgy. Sampaloc 2 26 2 - - 5 33

Brgy. San Agustin 1 29 - - - 1 30

Brgy. San Agustin 2 173 2 - - - 175

Silang 7 5 1 - 1 14

Brgy. Biga 1 5 3 1 - 1 10

Brgy. Biga 2 2 2 - - - 4

EAST - WEST 36 - - 1 3 40

DH-1 36 - - 1 3 40

Muntinlupa

Brgy. NBP 36 - - 1 3 40

DH-6 44 - 4 4 11 63

Tanza

Brgy. Bunga 9 - - - - 9

Brgy. Mulawin 3 - 1 - 1 5

Brgy. Biga 2 - 1 1 - 4

Brgy. Sanja Mayor 1 - - - - 1

559

2

Cont. Annex 1

Type of Roof Segment/Municipality/

Barangay GI Sheets

Tiles Nipa/

CogonOthers

No Data

Total

Imus

Brgy. Malagasang 2b 6 - - - 1 7

Brgy. Malagasang 2c 22 - - 3 9 34

General Trias

Brgy. Tapia 1 - 2 - - 3

CALA 15 2 - - 4 21

Silang

CE-6 5 2 - - 4 11

Brgy. Biga 1 5 2 - - 4 11

CE-7 10 - - - - 10

Brgy. Sabutan 10 - - - - 10

560

3

Annex 1a No. of Respondents by Size of Living Area and Type of Roof

Type of Roof Size of Living Area

GI sheets

Tiles Nipa/

CogonOthers

No Data

Total

CALA 15 2 - - 4 21

Brgy. Sabutan Silang 10 - - - - 10

Less than 100 10 10

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No Data -

Brgy. Biga 1 Silang Rev 5 2 - - 4 11

Less than 100 3 1 4

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 2 1 4 7

NORTH - SOUTH 323 7 - 50 40 420

Brgy. Buhay Na Tubig 11 - - - - 11

Less than 100 10 10

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 1 1

Over 300 m2 -

No Data -

Brgy. Burol Main 6 - - - 2 8

Less than 100 4 4

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1

151 m2 - 200 m

2 1 1

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 2 2

561

4

Cont. Annex 1a


GI sheets

Tiles Nipa/

CogonOthers

No Data

Total

Brgy. Salitran 1 12 - - 1 - 13

Less than 100 6 1 7

101 m2 - 150 m

2 4 4

151 m2 - 200 m

2 1 1

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 1 1

No Data -

Brgy. Salitran 2 3 1 - - 1 5

Less than 100 -

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1

151 m2 - 200 m

2 1 1

201 m2 - 250 m

2 1 1

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 1 1 2

Brgy. San Agutin 2 23 - - - 1 24

Less than 100 13 1 14

101 m2 - 150 m

2 6 6

151 m2 - 200 m

2 3 3

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 1 1

Brgy. Talaba 2 89 - - - 5 94

Less than 100 82 2 84

101 m2 - 150 m

2 2 2

151 m2 - 200 m

2 2 2

201 m2 - 250 m

2 2 2

251m2 - 300 m2 1 1

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 3 3

Brgy. Talaba 3 60 6 - - 3 69

Less than 100 53 6 59

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1

562

5

Cont. Annex 1a


GI sheets

Tiles Nipa/

CogonOthers

No Data

Total

151 m2 - 200 m

2 3 3

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 1 1

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 2 3 5

Brgy. Talaba 7 26 - - 1 10 37

Less than 100 24 24

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 2 1 3

No Data 9 9

Brgy. Zapote 5 Bacoor 93 - - 48 18 159

Less than 100 40 25 1 66

101 m2 - 150 m

2 22 7 29

151 m2 - 200 m

2 6 8 14

201 m2 - 250 m

2 7 1 1 9

251m2 - 300 m2 2 2

Over 300 m2 10 3 13

No Data 6 4 16 26

EAST - WEST 80 - 4 5 14 103

Brgy. [1] Biga Tanza 2 - 1 1 - 4

Less than 100 2 1 1 4

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

Brgy. [1] Tapia Gen Trias 1 - 2 - - 3

Less than 100 1 2 3

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

563

6

Cont. Annex 1a


GI sheets

Tiles Nipa/

CogonOthers

No Data

Total

Brgy. Mulawin, Tanza 3 - 1 - 1 5

Less than 100 3 1 1 5

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

Brgy. NBP, Muntinlupa 36 - - 1 3 40

Less than 100 20 20

101 m2 - 150 m

2 7 7

151 m2 - 200 m

2 4 4

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 1 1

No data 5 1 2 8

Brgy. NBP, Malagasang 2b 6 - - - 1 7

Less than 100 6 6

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No data 1 1

Brgy. Sanja Mayor 1 - - - - 1

Less than 100 1 1

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

Brgy. NBP, Malagasang 2C 22 - - 3 9 34

Less than 100 9 3 3 15

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1 2

151 m2 - 200 m

2 6 6

201 m2 - 250 m

2 1 4 5

251m2 - 300 m2 1 1 2

564

7

Cont. Annex 1a


GI sheets

Tiles Nipa/

CogonOthers

No Data

Total

Over 300 m2 -

No data 4 4

Brgy. Bunga, Tanza 9 - - - - 9

Less than 100 9 9

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No data -

565

8

Annex 2 No. of Respondents by Barangay by Type of Wall

Type of Wall Barangay

All Concrete

Concrete & Wood

All Wood

Wood &

Nipa &

Others

No Data

Total

CALA Expressway 7 9 1 - - - 4 21

Brgy Sabutan Silang 4 6 10

Brgy.Biga 1 Silang Rev 3 3 1 4 11

NORTH-SOUTH 129 132 104 10 1 3 41 420

Brgy. Buhay Na Tubig 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 11

Brgy. Burol Main 1 4 1 0 0 0 2 8

Brgy. Salitran 1 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 13

Brgy. Salitran 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

Brgy. San Agustin 2 4 19 0 0 0 0 1 24

Brgy. Talaba 2 34 46 9 0 0 0 5 94

Brgy. Talaba 3 40 24 0 0 0 0 5 69

Brgy. Talaba 7 20 6 0 0 0 1 10 37

Brgy. Zapote 5 Bacoor 8 26 94 10 1 2 18 159

EAST - WEST 33 40 12 6 - 7 5 103

Brgy. Bunga, Tanza 7 2 - - - - - 9

Brgy. Mulawin, Tanza 3 - 1 - - - 1 5

Brgy. NBP, Malagasang 2b 3 1 - 1 - 1 1 7

Brgy. NBP, Malagasang 2c 4 15 6 3 - 3 3 34

Brgy. NBP, Muntinlupa 14 18 4 1 - 3 - 40

Brgy. Sanja Mayor 1 - - - - - - 1

Brgy. [1] Biga Tanza 1 1 1 1 - - - 4

Brgy. [1] Tapia Gen Trias - 3 - - - - - 3

-

566

9

Annex 2a No. of Respondents by Size of Living by Type of Wall

Type of Wall Size of Living Area

All C t

Concrete & W d

All W d

Wood &

Nipa &

Others

No Data

Total

CALA Expressway 7 9 1 - - - 4 21

Brgy. Sabutan Silang 4 6 - - - - - 10

Less than 100 4 6 10

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No Data -

-

Brgy. Biga 1 Silang Rev 3 3 1 - - - 4 11

Less than 100 2 1 1 4

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 1 2 4 7

NORTH - SOUTH 129 132 104 10 1 3 41 420

Brgy. Buhay Na Tubig 6 5 - - - - - 11

Less than 100 5 5 10

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 1 1

Over 300 m2 -

No Data -

Brgy. Burol Main 1 4 1 - - - 2 8

Less than 100 1 2 1 4

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1

151 m2 - 200 m

2 1 1

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 2 2

567

10

Cont. Annex 2a


All C

Concrete & W d

All W d

Wood &

Nipa &

Others

No Data

Total

Brgy. Salitran 1 11 2 - - - - - 13

Less than 100 7 7

101 m2 - 150 m

2 3 1 4

151 m2 - 200 m

2 1 1

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 1 1

No Data -

Brgy. Salitran 2 5 - - - - - - 5

Less than 100 -

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1

151 m2 - 200 m

2 1 1

201 m2 - 250 m

2 1 1

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 2 2

Brgy. San Agutin 2 4 19 - - - - 1 24

Less than 100 2 11 1 14

101 m2 - 150 m

2 6 6

151 m2 - 200 m

2 2 1 3

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 1 1

Brgy. Talaba 2 34 46 9 - - - 5 94

Less than 100 30 43 9 2 84

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1 2

151 m2 - 200 m

2 2 2

201 m2 - 250 m

2 2 2

251m2 - 300 m2 1 1

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 3 3

Brgy. Talaba 3 40 24 - - - - 5 69

Less than 100 36 21 2 59

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1

151 m2 - 200 m

2 2 1 3

201 m2 - 250 m

2 1 1

251m2 - 300 m2 1 1

Over 300 m2 -

No Data 1 3 4

568

11

Cont. Annex 2a


All C

Concrete & W d

All W d

Wood &

Nipa &

Others

No Data

Total

Brgy. Talaba 7 20 6 - - - 1 10 37

Less than 100 18 6 24

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 2 1 3

No Data 9 9

Brgy. Zapote 5 Bacoor 8 26 94 10 1 2 18 159

Less than 100 4 14 39 6 1 1 2 67

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 5 22 1 29

151 m2 - 200 m

2 12 2 1 15

201 m2 - 250 m

2 1 7 8

251m2 - 300 m2 2 2

Over 300 m2 1 4 7 1 13

No Data 2 2 5 1 15 25

EAST - WEST 33 40 12 6 - 7 5 103

Brgy. [1] Biga Tanza 1 1 1 1 - - - 4

Less than 100 1 1 1 1 4

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

Brgy. [1] Tapia Gen Trias - 3 - - - - - 3

Less than 100 3 3

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

Brgy. Mulawin, Tanza 3 - 1 - - - 1 5

Less than 100 3 1 1 5

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

569

12

Cont. Annex 2a


All C

Concrete & W d

All W d

Wood &

Nipa &

Others

No Data

Total

Brgy. NBP, Muntinlupa 14 18 4 1 - 3 - 40

Less than 100 7 8 4 1 20

101 m2 - 150 m

2 4 3 7

151 m2 - 200 m

2 2 3 5

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No data 1 4 3 8

Brgy. NBP, Malagasang 2b

3 1 - 1 - 1 1 7

Less than 100 3 1 1 1 6

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No data 1 1

Brgy. Sanja Mayor 1 - - - - - - 1

Less than 100 1 1

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

Brgy. NBP, Malagasang 2C

4 15 6 3 - 3 3 34

Less than 100 3 4 4 1 3 1 16

101 m2 - 150 m

2 1 1

151 m2 - 200 m

2 6 1 1 2 10

201 m2 - 250 m

2 1 1 2

251m2 - 300 m2 1 1

Over 300 m2 4 4

No data -

Brgy. Bunga, Tanza 7 2 - - - - - 9

Less than 100 7 2 9

101 m2 - 150 m

2 -

151 m2 - 200 m

2 -

201 m2 - 250 m

2 -

251m2 - 300 m2 -

Over 300 m2 -

No data -

570

chapter five - jica · 2007. 2. 22. · chapter five cala east-west national road project 5-1 5....

Documents