chapter-i introduction - shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/18129/6/06_chapter...
TRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER-I
INTRODUCTION
From time immemorial, India has had very strong historical and
cultural ties with Burma (now Myanmar). Literary sources of the
Great Mauryan dynasty of India, speak of the spread of Buddhism in
·subarnabhumi', of which Burma was an integral part by two Indian
missionaries, Sona and Uttara, in the 3rd century B.C. during the
reign of King Ashoka. 1 And with the passage of time, religion spread
by Sona and Uttara became very popular there and this finds its
expression in the construction of many beautiful temples and statues
in honour of Lord Buddha. Even the name ·subarnabhumi' or
"Kanakapura' or "Land of Gold' was coined because of the lucrative
trading activities of Indian traders from Champa, i.e., Bhagalpur,
Broach, Banares and Tamralipti, who used to trade with Pegu,
Moulmein and other cities of Myanmar. 2
Romila Thapar, Ashoka & the Decline of the Mauryas (Oxford University Press, Delhi, 1963, p.4 7.
2 Dr. P.N.Chopra, ed., The Gazetteer of India, Indian Union, History and Culture, Vol.Two (Publication Division, Deptt. Of Culture, Ministry of Education, New Delhi, 1990), p.98.
Apart from Sona and Uttara's missionary activities in Burma,
close contacts with South Indian Pallava dynasty (A.D. 560-903) and
Chola dynasty (A.D. 850-1200) can be found with Burma. The
inscriptions found at the ancient site of 'Sriksetra' in Burma reveal
inscription written in Sanskrit, Pali and South Indian Pallava-Grantha
script with short extracts from the Abhidhamma Pitaka. And
numerous figures of the Buddha in stone, bronze and terracotta have
also come to light and these are all in Indian style. However, this
common historical legacy was broken with the beginning of Muslim
rule in India and Mongol invasion in the last quarter of the 13th
century in Burma. a
The barriers between these two countries were broken with the
coming of the British, which colonised both the countries, firstly India
in the middle of 18th century, then Burma in the late 19th century.
Under British imperialism, both of them realised the same pain of
suppression and economic exploitation, and their sentiments also ran
together to get liberated from the yoke of foreign rule. So, the Indian
nationalist movement was very important in setting the pattern of
Ibid., p.99.
2
direct challenge to British rule in Myanmar, as it not only provided
Burmese people the basic objectives of constitutional reforms but it
also gave them the messages of non-violent struggle and boycott
methods which were eventually employed later on in their fight for
freedom, which will be discussed at length in the following chapters of
the proposed study.
The main objective of this chapter is to identify the socio
economic-cultural-historical linkages between Myanmar and India
since ancient times till the British colonial rule. It will try to explain
the common problems under British imperialism and trace the
genesis of their nationalist resurgence.
The attempt is made to focus our enquiry mainly during 1906
to 1948, which is considered an important phase of nationalist
movement in Burma. The year 1906 is significant due to the
establishment of Burma's flrst political organisation viz. Young Men's
Buddhist Association (YMBA), which shaped the course of
nationalistic feelings among Burmese people and provided an
important platform for the grov.rth of many talented leaders, like,
Maung Ba Pe, Maung Hla Pe and Maung Maung Gyi and others. On
the other hand, the year 1948 is important because Burma got its
political independence in that year, and the country ushered into an
era of democratic polity.
GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING
Strategically, Burma occupies an important place in Southeast
Asia. The Union of Myanmar (Myanma-Naing-nagan, formerly Burma)
lies in the north-west region of Southeast Asia, between the Tibetan
plateau and the Malay peninsula. The country is bordered by
Bangladesh and India to the north-west, by the People's Republic of
China and Laos to the north-east and by Thailand to the Southeast.4
It has an area of 676,552 square kilometres (261 ,218 square miles)
with long coastline of the Indian Ocean forming a natural boundary to
the south. Roughly in diamond shape, Burma is often compared to a
'kite' with a tail trailing along one side. 5
The Europa World Year Book (Europa Publications, London, 1997), p.2321.
Aung San Suu Kyi, Freedom from Fear and other Writings (Penguin Books, 1991), p.39.
-1
The climate of Burma is hot and tropical, although the Shan
plateau is more temperate, with an average temperature of 27oC
(80°F} with monsoon rains from May to October. The average annual
rainfall is between 2,500 mm and 5,000 mm in the coastal and
mountainous regions of the north and east, but reaches a maximum
of only 1,000 mm in the lowlands of the interior.6
THBLAim
Burma is the largest of all the states of mainland Southeast
Asia with its main part consisting of a valley, some 600 miles long and
100 miles broad, surrounded by mountain ranges on three sides. Its
north-eastern and eastern borders are also marked by rugged ranges,
high to the north and lower behind the Tennsserim coast. 7 Thus
northern mountains could be called as the tail-end of the eastern
Himalayas. Along the north-west border run the 'Paktai Hills' and the
'Naga Hills'. In its western side are the 'Chin Hills' and trailing to the
6 The Europa World Year Book, n.4, 2322.
Uma Shankar Singh, Burma and India ( 1948-62) (Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, 1979), p.3.
south is the Arakan Yoma.8 The Pegu Yoma is another chain of
mountains which begins in central Burma and extends down to the
Irrawaddy delta. In the eastern part of the country lies the Shan
plateau and the plains areas of Burma may be roughly divided into
the dry zone in the heart of the country, the coastal lands, Arakan in
the west and the long 'tail' of Tenasserim in the south-east and the
lush delta of the Irrawaddy.9
Because of its mountainous terrain, the land traffic with her
land neighbours are severely restricted and it is accessible mainly
through the Bay of Bengal and Andaman sea apart from air-traffic.
For centuries, Burma's major arteries of economic and cultural
development have been its rivers, and especially the Irrawaddy and
the Chindwin. And in contrast to its northern dry belt the southern
fertile delta part of Burma is often called as 'rice-bowl' of the world.
The main river of Burma is the Irrawaddy which flows from the
Kachin Hills in the north and follows a southerly course for over two
thousand kilometres. The other two rives of importance are the
9
Yoma is a Burmese term for a ridge of mountains.
Aung San Suu Kyi, n.S, p.40.
(,
Salween, and the Chindwin. The Chindwin flows down from the
north-west and joins the Irrawaddy in central Burma. The Salween
comes from a source in the mountains of Tibet and fmds its way
across the Shan plateau in eastern Burma down to the sea. The
Salween having a length of approximately 1,750 miles is the longest
river in Burma. 10
Burmese economy is based on mainly agricultural crops and
timber trade. Its main products apart from rice, are sugarcane,
groundnuts, pulses, maize and sesame and millet tobacco, cotton,
rubber are also product in considerable quantities. Besides these
crops, there is a great range of fruit and vegetables in Burma. The
Shan range of Burma is famous for its oranges, strawberries, pears
and other fruits which requires a more temperate climate. The forests
of Burma are one of the country's biggest source of revenue.
Although variety of forests products and forests are abundant in
Burma but most important are the mixed deciduous forests which
include teak, paduk and pyinkado. Burmese teak's streangh,
durability and lack of shrinkage quality made it one of the most
It! Uma Shankar Singh, n.7, pp.3-4.
7
valued woods of the world. Pyinkado wood is also known as the iron
wood among Burmese because of its hardness and strength. And
Padank is described as all utility wood in Burma next to teak.
Besides having useful agriculture and forests products Burma
is also rich in mineral products. Here, petroleum, natural gas, lead,
zinc, tin, wolfram and silver are obtained in quality. And, sufficient
petroleum is produced in central Burma to satiate the demand of the
whole country. Burma, deficient in heavy engineering and large
manufacturing base, imports commodities like machinery and
transport equipments, mineral fuels, lubricants, chemicals and
related products, animal and vegetable oil fats and waxes, cement,
base metals etc. and major exporting items are forestry products like
teak and other hardwood, rice, pulses, raw rubber and live animals
products like prawns (fresh and dried, fish and fish products etc.). 11
Strategically in Southeast Asia and rich in such mineral and
agricultural resources Burma was a natural attraction to any colonial
power of 19th century. And the Britishers, the epitome of imperialist
design in that period frrmly grounded in neighbouring India in mid-
18th century, acted fast at the disorderly situation of Burma and
ll The Europa World Year Book, n.4, p.2336
X
colonised h~r in three successive Anglo-Burmese wars in the 19th
century.
THE PEOPLE
Burma is comparatively underpopulated country in contrast to
India and Bangladesh to the west and China to the northeast.
Population is mainly concentrated in the deltas of Irrawaddy and
Sittang rivers, in the central dry belt, and along the northern
Tenasserim coast. The majority of Burmese population of about 97.2
percent are Buddhist. Besides having majority Buddhist community,
it has other religious communities like Christians around 5.6 percent,
Muslims around 3.6 percent, Hindus about 1.0 percent and and 2.6
percent population are animists or adherents of other religions. 12
Buddhism plays an important role as a unifying force in Burma.
And its special position was recognised by the Constitution of 1947 as
the faith professed by the great majority of the Burmese people.
Lingua-franca and the official language of the Burma is Burmese
language although the use of English is permitted which is widely
12 Ibid., p.2337.
used in Rangoon and has been the medium of instruction at colleges
and universities at higher levels.
Although ethnically, Burman people constitute the largest
groups in Burma but historically it is Mon people who came to Burma
in earliest phase between 2500 and 1500 B.C. So in the history of
Burma the Mons settled in parts of Thailand, along the Tenasserim
and on the Irrawaddy delta. And from earliest time it is generally
believed that the Mons were predominantly followers of Buddhism.
But, there appears to' have been a period when the Mons in Burma
came under strong Hindu influence when Buddhism declined in
India. However, by the eleventh century, the Mon kingdoms in Pegu
and Thaton are known to have been Buddhist. 13
After the Mons came the Tibeto-Burman people from the north.
As stated earlier the Burmans constitute the largest ethnic
community in Burma and the Burmese believe that their early Tibeto
Burman ancestors were the 'Pyus', the 'Kanyans' and the 'Theks'.
Although historically very little is known about the Kanyans and
13 Aung San Suu Kyi, n.S, p.45.
ill
Theks beyond their names but much more can be proved about the
Pyus. Archaeological excavations of some Pyus sites have revealed
that they had a well-developed civilization in central Burma, Halin
and at Beikthano. 14
The Shans make up the third important racial group of Burma.
And, according to Shan tradition it is believed that their first kingdom
was set up by the King Beinnaka, a descendant of the kings of
7agaunk' after the fall of the ancient capital of Pyu. Historically
Shans were first mentioned in the stone inscription of twelfth century
in Burmese language. The Shans belong to the Thai groups of
peoples who are mostly distributed in Indo-China region. The Shan
people has a heroic name in the history of Burma in fighting against
the Mongol invasion in the thirteenth century, when they attacked the
eastern pla au of Burma. They fought back against Mongol
domination as well as started attacking the tottering kingdom of
Pagan which was then ruled by the King Yazadhirit between 1385
A.D. to 1423 A.D.ts
14
15
Dr. P.N. Chopra, n.2, p.99.
Aung San Su Kyi, n.5, pp.48-49.
i I
Besides the above mentioned three major ethnic groups in
Burma, there are other minority groups like Chins, Kachins, Karens,
Kayahs, Arakanese or Rakhines and Indian and Chinese community
in Burma; speaking over one hundred languages.
The Chin people live in the hill tracts of north-western part of
Burma. Historically, Chins belong to the Tibeto-Burman racial group
but there are diverse tribes and area demarcated among Chins.
Because of their habitat in hilly areas they are often known as 'zomi'
or Laomi Chins meaning mountain people. During earlier times
Chins were mainly spirit-worshippers but nowadays there are many
who profess Christian and Buddhism religion among them. The Chins
are basically agriculturist and a peace loving community in Burma.
Another ethnic group Kachins have the same antecedents like
Burman people and they belong to the same stock of Tibeto-Burman
people. According to their diversity in language, Kachin people can be
divided into four major language groups - 1) the Jingpaws, 2) the
Mazus, 3) the Yaywins and 4) the Lsus. When Burma became
12
colonised in the late nineteenth century, Christian missionaries
introduced a written form of Jingpaw based on Roman alphabet. And
because of this, Jingpaw became the most popular language in the
Kachin state. So when people talk of Kachin people they usually
mean Jingpaw group of peoples and not others like the Marus,
Yaywins and Lisus. May be because of their less numbers and
unorganised grammar they didn't become such popular like
Jingpaws.
The Karens like the Chins and the Kachins, were traditionally
spirit-worshippers. But under the British colonial rule many among
them converted to Christianity. Although some of them also profess
Buddhism. Some Christian missionaries have even concluded that
they might be descendants of the lost tribe of Israel. And some of
them even believed for a long time that the Karens were a Thai-Shan
people. However, studies of their languages and social customs have
given sufficient proof that they belong to the Tibeto-Burman group.
Like Kachins, Karens have also diverse groups and the Pao, the
Sagaw and the Bwe Karens are prominent among them. Under
British rule Christsianity made the greatest impact on Karen peoples
life. This new religion gave them western education, schools and
colleges and the opportunity to pursue modern profession and to take
up higher studies abroad. 16 And this opportunity also made the
majority of Karens the most loyal subject of British rule among all
Burmese ethnic communities.
The Kayah ethnic community are spread along the
neighbouring tracts of Karen state. Some people also call them
'Karennis' or 'Red Karens' because of the colour of their costumes.
The origin of another group - Arakanese or Rakhenis is
something of a mystery. It is believed that they were a mixture of
Mongolian and Aryan peoples who had come over from India.
Although there is no doubt that their early Kings were of Indian
origin. But there are several groups of people in the Arakan like -
Thek, Dhimt, Myo, Mramagyi and Kaman. Basically Arakanese are
Tibeto-Burman people and their language is very close to Burmese.
But the influence of Bengali language on Arakanese language also
hints to some extent that there were times when Indian influence was
16 Ibid., pp.60-61
14
very prominent on Arakanese affairs. One c:an also draw a conclusion
that because of its geographical proximity to the Indian territory of
Bengal, Bengali culture and social trends played a major role in the
history and civilization of Arakan.
Besides heterogenous indigenous minority groups or racial
groups in Burma, there were alien minority groups like the Indians,
the Chinese and others. During the sixty-three years of British
colonial rule or as a part of British India, large numbers of Indians
drawn mainly from Madras, Bihar, Orissa and Bengal migrated as
labourers or moneylenders to Burma. Till 1958 the total Indian
population stood at 7 lakhs besides one lakh Pakistani, mostly in
Arakan. And they were mainly concentrated in the Irrawaddy Delta
region and Rangoon. 17 During British rule there was no control on
the numbers of Indians and Chinese who came to seek their fortune
in Burma but when it became an independent nation, many Chinese
and Indian communities left the nation. However, there are still large
numbers of Indian and Chinese people in Burma largely concentrated
in the towns and cities. Some among them even intermarried with the
I; Uma Shankar Singh, n.7, p.S.
l"
local people and for them, Burma is the only home they have ever
known and they love it as their own motherland. And these diverse
ethnic groups and cultures and customs make Burma fascinating
country rich in variety and tradition. ts
And observing Burma's diverse ethnic map, Britishers under its
colonial rule never gave a serious thought to the development of
anything like a 'national culture' or a 'national society' that would
transcend the group loyalties of the Burmese and of the minority
groups in the country. On the other hand, they utilised the same
tactics of 'divide and rule' policy which they had earlier used in India
and else where of encouraging the non-Burmese groups to retain their
group characteristics. The '"excluded areas" were separately
administered from Burma proper, and under its tested administrative
policy common ties between the Burman and non-Burman groups
were discouraged. Thus the people of Burma were governed by
British impeiialists, in ways that served to perpetuate their
differences.
18 Aung San Suu Kyi., n.S, p.66
But Britishers failed to observe that even with the sharp
differences of certain customs among Burmese diverse minority
group, there was a strong current of cultural unity and oneness as a
'fheravada Buddhism' existed in Burmese peoples mind and heart
across the country. And whenever the opportunity came to stand up
with the voice of liberty across Asia, they valiantly stood as one nation
with cry of 'freedom and liberty'. Burmese people are by nature
considered as a peace loving and generous. India's great leader and
keen observer of human behaviour, Gandhiji very aptly remarked
about Burmese people while addressing a large public gathering at
Fytchi Square in Rangoon on March 8, 1929, that, "Whenever I have
come to Burma, I have looked forward to the visit. I am in love with
the men and women of Burma. You in your address have well said
that the people of Burma are generous and liberal hearted. I know
they are generous to a fault," again he stressed it more emphatically
that, "I know also, I recognised it in 190 1 when I came here for the
first time to see my life-long friend and companion Dr. P.J. Mehta that
I did not take much time before I fell in love with the men and women
of Burma. I recognize that your women are the freest in the world. I
17
recognize the openness in men and women of Burma which captivated
me."t9
BURMA AJm INDIA: ANCIENT PERIOD
As stated earlier India has had very strong socio-economic-
cultural and historical linkages with Burma (now Myanmar) since
early times of Burmese civilization.
According to the traditions current among the people of Pegu,
an important city of Burma, the Indian colonist from the country of
the lower courses of the rivers K.istnu and Godavari, had at a remote
time crossed the sea and established the settlements in the delta of
the Irrawadi and on the adjoining coast. And in Buddhist legends the
country they occupied became known as 'Suvama Bhumi' or 'Golden
land'. This name resembles the Pali form of this designation, Sobana,
which occurs in Ptolemy's 'Geography' and is applied by colonel Yule
in his remarks on the ancient map of India to a place on the Coast of
19 The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Vol.XL, FebruaryMarch 1929, The Publication Division, Ministry of Information a~d Broadcasting, Govt. of India, Navajivan Trust, Ahmedabad, 1970, p.l04.
IX
the Gulf of Martaban. Historian Lassen observes that the country
named by that geographer, Chryse, means approximately the present
Pegu. And the 7hahtun' or 7haton' the native name of the ancient
capital or more correctly by Phayre Htawtun has in the Mon language
the same significance as the Sanskrit name. 20
Even in the ancient text of the 'Periplus of the Erythrean Sea'
which deals specifically with trading activities in ancient age, occurs
the following passage: "Immediately after leaving the Ganges there is
an island in the ocean called 'Khrusi' or the golden isle, which lies
directly under the rising Sun, and at the extremity of the world
towards the east. '2t And this golden isle or Khryse, about which even
Ptolemy referred in his geography is generally accepted as a region in
which Modern Bunna falls.
The earliest reference of Suvarnabhumi or Burma in Buddhist
Legends is found in the 'Jatakas' preserved in Ceylon. And it is
20 P. Arthur Phayre, History of Burma including Burma proper, Pegu,Taungu, Tenassirim and Arakan, Trubner's & Co., Ludgate Hill, 1883, London, p.24.
21 Ibid., p.25.
l<J
mentioned in it that after attaining 'perfection' when Gautama
Buddha was in contemplation in the Kiripalu forest or grove, two
brothers, named Tapusa and Palikat arrived with five hundred carts
of merchandise to pay their respect to lord Buddha from the city of
'Ukkalaba' (Burma) which was then a port city of Survarna Bhumi.
And the two brothers made an offering of honey to Buddha and they
entreated that he would bestow upon them something that they might
honour as a relic. And therefore Lord Buddha gave them eight hairs
of his head, which they brought to their own country and enshrined it
in a pagoda, which is since known as 'Shwe Dagon Pagoda' near the
modern town of Yangon (Rangoon). Phayre explains Ukkalaba as a
town west of the present town of Rangoon and near a village now
called Twantay'.
During the third Buddhist Council at Pataliputra in B.C. 241,
when missions were sent to foreign countries to propagate religion,
two revered monk Sona and Uttara were deputed to Burma by the
Great Indian Emperor Asoka. And according to the Talaing chronicles
when they arrived to do the same they were first violently opposed but
gradually they pacified the Burmese community and converted the
20
people to Buddhism. 22 This reference in the authentic Buddhist
records of ancient time proves continuity of Burmese contact with
India since the time of Buddha till third century B.C. and shows the
deep interest taken in India at that time in the affairs of the country.
It also supports the view of local traditions as to the previous
establishment of Indian colonists on the coast, and as to the existence
of one or more important commercial ports at an early period of
'Periplus of the Erythrean Sea'.
Further, the close connection between both the countries, is
proved by the reference made by the famous Chinese pilgrim of
Seventh century Hiuen Tsang. He mentions that after reaching at
'Samatata', which is identified with the delta of the Ganges or more
especially Eastern Bengal, he further went to the east of that region
'Srikhetra', which is identified as a place near to Prome by James
Fergusson. During the time of Hiuen Tsang in the seventh century,
the influence of Hindu culture can also be seen in the names of
various cities of Burma, where 'Rama' has been applied to several
places on Burmese coast. At that time, the delta of Irrawadi was
2l Ibid., p.26.
-n:.. ... J...;~ THESIS
320.5409591 R1377 My
Ill II 111111111 II IIIII/ Ill TH8374
21
known as 'Ramalanka' and 'the Irrawadi' was known as 'Ramayana'.
And the classic name of the city of Moulmein at that time was
'Ramaapura', Burmese coast as the island of Ramru and there was
also Ramanagar not far from Rangoon. Further east, the pilgrim state
is the kingdom of 'Tolopoti which is recognized as 'Dwarawati' by
historian M. Julien and he identifies it as the classic name of the town
and district of 'Sandoway' in southern Arakan.23
Among the various ethnic communities of Burma, Mons were
the frrst to come in contact with Indian culture and civilization, which
can also be affirmed by their structure of languages, which has
various Sanskrit and Pali words and one of the interesting feature of
fusion of Indian culture among Mons is that they modelled their script
on the South Indian script named "Pallava Granthi'. Even when the
Buddhism declined in most parts of India, Mons of Burma and other
ethnic communities continued with this religion and remained in
contact with Conjivuram in South India, where Hinayana Buddhism
at least found its refuge till the eleventh century. A.D.
Ibid., p.32.
One of the significant contributions of South Indian script
'Pallava Granthi' on the development of Burmese linguistic basic is
that through Mon script it gave an important basis to Burmese script
which is developed on Mon script. And this linguistic link became the
pivotal vehicle for the dissemination of the Indianised Mon culture,
Law and literature and many of the Burmese Monarchs adopted the
Indian concept of kingship, royal duties, powers and the court
etiquette, the divine origin, ministrations of Brahman priests at the
place, royal patronage of the Buddhist religion acceptance of the
traditional Hindu code of Manu as the prime source of law.24 Its
impact could be also seen on social and religious ceremonies of many
kinds, i.e., casting of horoscopes of the new born, domestic rituals of
womenfolk; 'shinbyu' ceremonies for boys; earpiercing ceremonies for
girls. And the Indian pattern of royalty with all its associated
paraphernalia included the royalty with umbrellas decorated with
golden leaves and bejewelled handles, coronation ceremonies,
24 D.R. Sardesai, South East Asia Past & Present (Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi, 1981), p.33.
weddings, processions, audiences, presentations of gifts and award
and so on.25
Influence of Indian culture can also be seen on other
historically significant ethnic people of Burma- The Pyus. The Pyus
probably migrated from south-west China in about the third century
B.C. Ruins of their capital city- Srikshetra six miles east of Prome at
the mouth of the Irrawaddy Basin testify to a flourishing culture
between the fourth and eighth century A.D. The Pyus were liberal in
following religions and they professed Hinduism as well as Hinayana
and Mahayana Buddhism during successive phases of their history.
However by the seventh century A.D., Hinayana faith had become the
dominant element in Pyu society and government. And like Indian
Vikrama era they also established their own Vikrama ern in the
beginning of 638 A.D., which later on spread over to Thailand and
Cambodia and is still followed in Burma and Thailand. 26
25 Uma Shankar Singh, n.7, p.9.
D.R. Sardesai, n.24, p.34.
The Buddhist stupas, cylindrical with a pointed dome built by
Pyus at Prome are remarkable monuments of artistry indicating Oriya
architectural influence from the northeast cost of India. And
characteristic of Pyu architecture is emobodiment of the Sikhara,
reminiscent again of the Bhubaneshwar temples of Orissa but further
refmed in its architectural form, it is consisted of a structure with an
inner chamber supporting a rounded-conic superstructure.27 So
apart from trading activities, missionaries like Sona and Uttara's
interaction with the Burmese people and architectural form express
close affinity of Burma with India during ancient period.
MEDIEVAL PERIOD:
Even during the medieval period or in the early eleventh century
many common concepts of Indian civilization are found in Burma.
The great Burman king Anawratha {1044-1077 A.D.) married an
Indian princess of Vaisali (which presently falls in Tirhut), and brick
bearing symbol of King Anawratha in Sanskrit text have been found in
various parts of Burma. Anawratha's traditions of the fusion of Indian
culture was continued by his son King Kyanzisha (1084-1112 A.D.) or
Ibid., p.35.
Kyansittha in later years as a great temple builder. He desired to
marry his daughter to an Indian Prince of Pattikera, although this
ended in tragedy and death of the prince by committing suicide but
this love episode is still reflected in poems and songs of Burma. 28
According to the Talaing chronicles at the Shwesandaw Pagoda of
Prome, Kyanzitha was instrumental in converting a Chola Prince to
Buddhism in his times during his visits to Burma. Kyanzittha was
also noted for decorating Buddhist temple of Bodh Gaya with precious
gems and to offer lights which should burn there forever. His father
king Anawratha's greatest achievement was the complete
transformation of the Burmese culture by its fusion with the Hindu
based Mon culture of Lower Burma. After conquering the Mon
territories he brought with him monks, artisans, craftsmen as well as
Buddhist scriptures and sacred relics. During this Mon invasion he
ws converted to Theravada Buddhism by the Mon monk Araban and
afterwards this form of Buddhism became the dominant religion of
Burma. Temples built by him reflect an interesting fusion of Hindu
Sir Arthur P. Phayre, n.20, p.38.
and Burmese architecture and some of its ruins can still be seen
particularly at the site of the old capital Pagan. 29
Kyansittha was succeeded by his grandson, who took the title of
Alaungsithu. He visited the western province of his dominions,
travelling through Arakan to the adjoining part of Bengal in India.
One of significant achievements was building the Shweku temple at
Pagan and reforming the administrative law (with regulating weights
and measures unit) of Burma. One of his greatest works was the
renovation of Bodh-Gaya temple. A stone inscription in the Burmese
language exists at Bodh Gaya which testifies to this generous act. A
facsimile of this inscription also mentioned in Vol.XX of the "Asiatic
Research Journal' which saysthat frequent repairs had been done by
Letyamengnan who is called therein Pyutathinmeng.30 Finally the
Anawratha dynasty was overthrown by Kublai Khan, the Mongol
Emperor of China in the thirteenth century.
29 Uma Shankar Singh, n.7, p.lO.
30 Sir Arthur P. Phyre, n.20, pp.39-40.
27
There are many other contact points between India and Burma
in the antiquities of Burma. Many references to Indians in Burma as
peasants, traders, astrologers, Indian epics, the Ganges water,
Buddhist missionaries from India, Bodh Gaya or to the great centres
of pilgrimages can be found in ancient texts. Indian resident colonies
could be seen at Pegu, Linschoten, a European traveller in his
"voyages to the East" written in 1592 says that his account of Burma
was derived from the Indian residents of Pegu who met in Goa.
Albuquerque mentions about three hundred Indians who he besieged
Malacca in 1510 A.D. Even the last dynasty of Burma founded by
Alaungpaya, usually called the Konbaung Dynasty ( 1752-1885)
revived the glories of the Burmese kingdom by conquering Ayuthia
(Thailand) and extending its boundaries beyond Arakan to cover
Assam and Manipur, which eventually led to the First Anglo-Burmese
war in 1824-26 and the loss of Burmese sovereignty in later years,
followed the Indian pattern of royalty and authorised the compilation
of a new Burmese Law Code -- 'Manu Kye Dhammathat' (based on the
Hindu Code of Manu) including the basic principles of the modern
Burmese Buddhist law. King Bodawpaya of this dynasty was proud of
2X
his Pandits and priests in Shastra and wisdom. 31
It is important point to note that before the British conquest of
Burma, Indians never entered this land of disciples of Buddha as a
invader, but as non-violent cultural messengers of Indian civilization,
even in the times of Great Mauryan dynasty or Moghul dynasty when
India was the greatest power of Asia with the possible exception of
Chinese empire.
Burma had been open to cultural influences from India since
the early days of her history. And of these influences, the most
important was Buddhism, which became so mingled with the
Burmese ethos, that it has become common saying: 'To be Bunnese is
to be Buddhist'. These early cultural and religious Indian imports
were selected and adapted by the Burmese in a way which brings out
the contrasting value of the two societies.
So by the time of the British conquest of Burma, cultural
influences from India and other neighbouring countries had long
31 Uma Shankar Singh, n.7, p.ll.
2')
since matured and one can even say that it developed into the
attributes of Burmese way of life. 32
Although, there is no doubt that being geographically closest to
India among Southeast Asian countries, its inhabitants must have
been the f:rrst in Southeast Asia to receive elements of Indian culture.
And in the adoption of their Indian practices and cultural norms, the
Burmese people exercised discretion in rejection of the Indian
hierarchical caste system and giving women a high place in society, 33
which was even noticed by Gandhiji in his visit to Burma in the year
March 1929.34
So the concluding remarks of this section are that the most
distinctive quality of Burmese religion and culture was its capacity to
absorb the cultural penetration of India and to reshape it in the
Burmese mould or framework.
Aung San Suu Kyi, n.S, p.83.
33 D.R. Sardesai, n.24, p.33.
34 The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Vol.XL, February-May 1929, The Publication Division, Min. of Information & Broadcasting, Govt. of India, Navajivan Trust, Ahmedabad, 1970, p.104.
AJIGLO-BlJRIIESE WARS AJm RISE OF lfATIOIIALJSM IN BURMA:
The annexations of Burma after three phases of Anglo-Burmese
war, i.e., 1824, 1852 and 1885, was endeavoured at the extension of
complete colonial command over India and its resources. Burma for
Britishers was the country of strategic importance in their imperialist
design which was geographically falling between the lucrative inland
Chinese trade route and making it an important buffer zone between
French colonial possession of mainland Indo-China. Although the
story of the British conquest of India was a long process which took
nearly two hundred years from the days of East India Company till
the proclamation of Queen Victoria as a Queen Empress of India in
1858. First time Britishers entered India as a humble trader but in
Bunna they arrived as a colonial master.
British view of Burma in the nineteenth century was that
culturally, economically and politically, it was an extension of India.
Having a firm base established in the middle of eighteenth century in
the eastern part of India, they saw Burma as a natural field of grazing
ground for their colonial thirst. And even before the first Anglo-
Burmese war of 1824-26, Britishers taking full advantage of the civil
war of 1753 in Burma between the forces of Alangapaya, the founder
of the last Burmese dynasty of Konbaung, and the Mons, they (East
India Company) occupied the strategic island of Negrais. By this, the
British hoped to check French activities in the Bay of Bengal and also
to gamer Burmese trade coming down the Irrawaddy. Burmese King
Alaungapaya first protested mildly against this British interference
and wrote a letter directly addressed to King George II, but the British
Government's failure to reply and the knowledge gathered from Mon
prisoners about British help to the Mon side in the Burmese civil war
provoked the Burmese King and he ordered a general massacre of the
East India Company's officials on the Negrais Island. But then the
British who were preoccupied with French power in their traditional
rival.Jy in Indian subcontinent for their colonial possession, swallowed
this humiliation resulting from the Negrais episode of Blackhole and
left Burma undisturbed for coming through decades. 35
After the 'Negrais episode' British officials sent their first
mission in 1795 under the captaincy of Michael Symes and then in
D.R. Sardesai, n.24, p.160
1802 under Symes again in the Court of Ava to investigate the
possibility of establishing trade communications between India and
China through Burusa. But Symes and his imperialistic co-partners
had other designs in their plan which was more than establishing
trade relations with Burma, which clearly reflected in the comments
of Symes after his 1802 visit to Burma and he reported to his masters
at India and England that, "A positive, and to us a very detrimental,
alliance between the Burmese and the French has been prevented and
French influence, if not eradicated, has at least been considerably
diminished.... At the same when there is a choice there may be
preference, and I am decidedly of opinion that a paramount influence
in the Government and administration of Ava, obtain it how we may,
is now become indispensably necessary to the interest and security of
the British possessions in the East. 36
But the British historian project the first Anglo-Burmese war as
aggressiveness on part of the Burmese king and on their wanton
pugnacity and in the flrst Anglo-Burmese war of 1824-26 ended with
36 D.R. Sardesai, British Trade and Expansion in Southeast Asia, 1830-1914 (Allied Pub., New Delhi, 1977), p.102.
:n
Arakan and Tenasserim passing under the British rule and in the
same way the second Anglo-Burmese war of 1852 added the province
of Pegu to the British empire and fmally the third Anglo Burmese war
of 1885-36 led to the surrender of the whole country under British ~~
colonial rule and an end of the Burmese sovereignty and monarchy.
Although the first two events of annexation had not an
empowering effect on Burmese life but the third Anglo-Burmese war
and the complete subjugation of the Burmese people touched the
pride of the Burmese people and shook their confidence. As long as
the last King Thibaw reigned at Mandalay in his royal capital the
symbol and pride of the Burmese freedom and liberty remained intact.
Phillip Woodruff in his articles in the Guardian, focused on vital
aspects of British rule that, 'the people in the province of British
Burma looked to the king in Mandalay with respect and indeed
reverence, they were proud that he still ruled but they showed no
great anxiety to count among his subjects. The Talaings (Mons), the
Arakanese, the Karens and the rest had at frrst been glad to see the
English, as memories of anarchy and extortion faded, they, no doubt,
like people in India, began to be less sure. But hardly any native of
Burma was pleased by the outcome of the Third Burmese war. 37
So as a result the third Anglo-Burmese war came as a rude
shock to most of the Burmese people, they hardly knew how to deal
with the new circumstances and the new experience of complete
political conquest and soon to be followed by cultural bondage or
subjugation. In 1886, Burma became politically and administratively
a part of India. But British policy makers failed to foresee the results
and its repercussions while determining to attach the country to the
Indian Empire. Although it was natural thing for them since each
course of the conquest was organised and executed by the
Government of India. And its ultimate result was the standardisation
of Burma's administration on Indian colonial model. Till 1862, lower
Burma consisted of three Commissionership of Pegu, Tenasserim and
Arakan; but in 1862 these three regions were combined into a single
province called British Burma and placed under a chief commissioner
with headquarters at Rangoon. And after the annexation of upper
and central Burma in 1886, the entire country as a single province
Aung San Suu Kyi, n.S, p.85.
was placed under the chief commissioner in 1897 Burma became a
Lieutenant-Governorship and in 1923 her status was further raised
when it was placed under Governor. And by the act of 1935 and
actually in 1937 Burma was separated from India and the Governor
was made directly responsible to the Government of the United
Kingdom.38 The study of these constitutional developments of Burma
and their repercussions as a nationalist resurgence are the subject of
study of later chapters and will be discussed at length in subsequent
chapters.
Although by 1886 the whole of Burma had become a part of
British colonial India still it took nearly further ten years to gain over
the control on simmering discontent against foreign rule. Although
the administration got established in urban or city areas but British
rule foreign in nature at every respect never gained ground in Burma
like its counterpart in India.
38 D.G.E. Hall, A History of Southeast Asia (New York, 1968), p.730.
In the first phase of British colonial rule, contacts with the
villages in Burma were disrupted with the adoption of its new revenue
policy. The social balance stabilizing pre-British Burma,with its
•egalitarian character of society" based on Theravada Buddhism was
upset by the colonial system. The end of monarchy, suppression and
economic exploitation ultimately became the genesis of the rise of
nationalism and forceful spirit to demand independence. 39
So the causes of nationalist resurgence in Burma could be seen
in the very nature of British rule in Burma. The decline of Burmese
culture and traditions under British rule occurred in many ways.
They came to assume the role of first citizen of the world with the
unquestioned right to mould the destinies of the less fortunate as
historian James Morris writes, "The British were now exporting to
their dominions a kind of package civilization, offered in competition
with the local product, and backed by powerful service arrangements.
Sometimes this was conscious policy.... More often, though, it was
instinctive or even incidental, and was seen by the British, if they saw
39 E. Sarkisyanz, Buddhist BackJ!rounds of the Burmese Revolution (The Hague/Martinus Nijhoff, 1965), p.148.
17
it at all, simply as an aspect of historical determinism. 40 And in the
course of exporting these package civilization, expert craftsmanship
which was earlier patronised by monarchy disappeared with the
growth of cheaper manufactured imports from Liverpool and
Manchester under British colonial rule. High literacy competence in
the Burmese language and literature gradually disappeared with the
disappearance of its masters and English became the language of law
courts and the government in new administrative setup. And as a
result monastic discipline also determined and British officials
refused to support disciplinruy measures of the Sangha and
eventually subjected the wearers of the yellow robes to the humiliating
control of the secular courts and the ordinruy police in the name of
civilized law of the people. The administrative tactics of the colonial
system reached out the villages at the end of 19th century bringing
irreversible changes and destroying the natural fabric of countryside
of self-sustaining economy into subservient economy on urban
centres.
Aung San Suu Kyi, n.S, p.86.
So the ball of discontent and discord was set against the British
colonial rule by Britishers themselves in pursuance of the same policy
which had triggered off the revolt against them in India in 1857.
Although the theatre of action was different territory, Burma, but they
miscalculated to understand the semblance of the same Asian
culture, which was passing from its churning phase to 'new life'.