chapter-ii last- finalshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/15948/10/09_chapter 2.p… ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 2
32
2.1. Introduction
Piperazine and piperidine derivatives are the most privileged structural motifs in
the field of nitrogen heterocyclic chemistry. They occur in several natural and synthetic
bioactive compounds. Rather they are widely used in medicine. Tens of thousands of
compounds of this series have been synthesized and studied by now; more than 300 of
them are used in medical practice as drugs. They include drugs with central and
peripheral neurotropic effects (local anesthetics, M-cholinoblockers, agonists and
antagonists of other pharmacological receptors, analgesics etc.,) agents that act on the
cardiovascular system (coronary dilative, antiarrhythmic, antihypertensive), spasmolytics,
diuretics, broncholytics, antiemetics, antinuclear drugs and many others.
Piperazine Piperidine
Both piperazine and piperidine are the two finest and classical representations of
six membered saturated nitrogen heterocycles. The name piperidine and piperazine
comes from the genus name Piper, which is the Latin word for pepper. Piperidine is a
nitrogen heterocycle with only one nitrogen atom on the six membered saturated ring,
where as piperazine is having two nitrogen atoms on the opposing side of the six
membered ring. Although they are structurally very similar, the nitrogen present on both
piperazine and piperidine makes them chemically and biologically different. The variation
of substituents on nitrogen atoms of these moieties plays an important role in selectivity
and potency against biological targets.
Chapter 2
33
The foregoing literature review gains rich knowledge on the role of piperazine and
piperidine derivatives in the field of bioorganic and medicinal chemistry.
2.1.1. Current status of piperazine and its derivatives in
the field of bioorganic and medicinal chemistry
2.1.1a. Piperazine as pharmaceutical agents:
The piperazine motif appears in many drugs encompassing a broad range of
activities (e.g. Oxatomide, Almitrine, Hydroxyzine, Buclizine, Lomerizine1). This motif
(monoaryl and diarylpiperazine) also found in drug candidates displaying anti-allergenic,2
antibacterial,3 anti-anxiety,
4 anti-emetic,
5 antimigraine
6 and platelet anti-aggregatory
activities.7 In addition, piperazine motif is present in many cardiovascular drugs
8 (e.g.,
Manidipine, Doxazosin, Trimetazidine, Flunarizine, Prazosin) and drug candidates.9-10
Piperazine and their derivatives also possess antimalarial activity,11
antioxidative activity12
and antifungal activity13
and found in many drug molecules such as Meclizine (motion
sickness drug), Cyclizine (antiemetic and antihistamine), Clozapine (antipsychotic drug),
Imatinib (leukemia drug), Befuraline (stimulant and antidepressant), Antrafenine
(analgesic), Trazodone (sedating antidepressant) and Niaprazine (sedating antihistamine)
etc.
Nitrogen in piperazine ring plays an important role in exerting biological effects.
The basicity of piperazine nitrogen plays an important role in selectivity and potency
towards the biological targets. In recent structural activity relationship study of
antimuscarinic compounds, it was shown that there was a favorable electrostatic
interaction between the protonated piperazine and the anionic region of the receptor. By
varying the substituents on the terminal piperazine nitrogen, the potency and selectivity
of the molecule toward its muscarinic receptor was greatly improved.14
Chapter 2
34
Figure 2.1: Some representative examples of piperazine derivatives being used as
pharmaceutical drugs.
Chapter 2
35
Among several piperazine derivatives known in the field of medicinal chemistry,
monoaryl and diarylpiperazine derivatives leading the piperazine family as promising
bioactive molecules. Of note, benzhydril and benzyl piperazine derivatives are emerging
as the most successful bioactive piperazine derivatives.
Benzhydrilpiperazine Benzylpiperazine
Both benzhydrilpiperazine and benzylpiperazine derivatives possess a wide range
of pharmacological properties. Chemists had wide variety of options to synthesize
biologically active derivatives of benzylpiperazine, by keeping the benzyl/substituted
benzyl group at one end of the piperazine and substituting the various substituents
including the substituents which have biological importance, at the other end of the
piperazine ring. The research which is going on the synthesis of benzyl/benzhydril
piperazine and its derivatives as which exhibit wide range of biological activities are
summarized below:
2.1.1b. Benzhydrilpiperazine:
An honored scaffold among arylpiperazine derivatives
Benzhydril group on the piperazine ring plays a paramount role in elucidating the
biological activities of these derivatives upon conjugation with other analogues.
Benzhydrilpiperazine belongs to the monoaryl piperazine family and their derivatives
possess a wide range of pharmacological properties. Hence, chemists have broad range of
pathways which paves way to synthesize biologically active derivatives of
benzhydrilpiperazine by coupling various substituents on one of the nitrogen atoms of the
piperazine moiety and without replacing the benzhydril group at the other end of the
Chapter 2
36
piperazine and they have succeeded in obtaining the compounds with marked
enhancement in the biological activity compared to the conventional drugs. Also, it is
believed that the pharmacological activities of benzhydrilpiperazine derivatives are
attributed due to the presence of two nitrogen atoms on the piperazine ring.
Moreover, monoaryl and diarylpiperazine derivatives play an important role.
Among these, benzhydrilpiperazine is a core of many bioactive compounds which exhibit
a variety of pharmacological effects which have been reported in the literature and for
instance,
Kawasaki et al.,15
have synthesized a novel series of benzhydrilpiperazine
trimethylhydroquinone derivatives 29 and found to have antioxidative and anti-allergic
effects. Among the synthesized compound, 4-[4-(4-diphenylmethyl-1-piperazinyl)-
butoxy]-2, 3, 6- trimethyl phenol exhibited good anti-oxidative and antiallergic activities.
29
where; n = 2 to10
Shanklin et al.,16
have synthesized Flunarizine 30 bearing benzhydrilpiperazine and
reported as calcium antagonist and antioxidants. Substituents on the benzene rings of the
benzhydril group had a large effect on the activity. Compounds with fluoro substituents in
the 3- and/or 4-positions of both benzene rings of benzhydril were found to be more
potent, but flunarizine has also been known to have a clinical risk of extrapyramidal side
effects caused through the binding to D2 receptor.
Chapter 2
37
30
Miyake et al.,17
have reported Tamolarizine 31, a new type of organic Ca2+
channel
blocker for its reversing effect on multidrug-resistant tumor cells. Tamolarizine
synergistically potentiated the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin for doxorubicin-resistant K562
cells at a concentration of 0.1 to10 µM. These results indicate that tamolarigine reverses
the multidrug-resistance phenotype through direct interaction with P-glycoprotein.
31
Ito et al.18
have synthesized Lifarizine 32 bearing benzhydrilpiperazine and
imidazole skeleton which has been reported as a calcium antagonist.
Emanuel et al.,19
have synthesized Oxatomide 33 as H1-antihistamines. The
benzimidazolone skeleton is responsible for its antihistaminic activity and also the length
of alkyl chain between piperazine and benzimidazolone influenced the activity.
Chapter 2
38
Sugiyama et al.,20
have synthesized a series of o-aminophenol derivatives
possessing H1-antihistaminic activity and their effects were investigated on lipid
peroxidation in rat brain homogenates. The compound 34 with secondary amine showed
highest activity.
N N
F
F HN
HO
CH3
34
Abou-Ghabria et al.,21
have synthesized a series of polycyclic piperazinyl imides
and among the synthesized, 2-[4-[4-[bis(4-flurophenyl)methyl]-1-piperazinyl]butyl]-
4,4a,5,5a,6,6a-hexahydro-4,6-ethenocycloprop[f]isoindole-1,3(2H,3aH)-dione 35 which
demonstrated good H1-antagonist activity. They also demonstrated that substitution of a
xanthinyl moiety for the polycyclic imide group led to the identification of novel
xanthinyl-substituted piperazinyl derivatives with potent antihistamine H1 activity.
Chapter 2
39
35
Chern et al.,22
have synthesized a series of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines 36 and
tested for their antiviral activity. SAR studies revealed that phenyl group at the N-1
position and the hydrophilic diphenylmethyl at the piperazine largely influenced the in
vitro antienteroviral activity of this new class of potent antiviral agents.
36
Hajos et al.,23
have reported substituted benzhydril-2-hydroxypropyl piperazine
derivatives 37 as cardiotonic agents.
37
where, R is hydrogen or acetyl, Ar1 and Ar2 are phenyl or substituted phenyl,
and X is selected from the group of heterocyclic compounds.
Kaneko et al.,24
have synthesized novel benzhydrilpiperazine derivatives 38 and
studied the effect of inhibiting over contraction and overextension of the myocardium
without being accompanied by a myocardium-inhibiting effect. By using the novel
Chapter 2
40
benzhydrilpiperazine derivatives as an effective ingredient, it is possible to obtain a
myocardial necrosis inhibitor which can protect against myocardial necrosis.
38
where R represents or
Baltes et al.,25
have patented the synthesis of 2-[4-(diphenylmethyl)-1-
piperazinyl]-acetic acids 39, their amides and their salts, processes for the preparation
thereof and therapeutic compositions. These compounds are found to be antiallergic,
spasmolytic and antihistaminic agents.
39
where: Y= -OH or –NH2; X and X1= H, halogen, alkoxy or
trifluoromethyl; m=1 or 2 and n=1 or 2.
Labrid et al.,26
have synthesized almitrine 40 which is a triazinylpiperazine
derivative and currently using for respiratory insufficiency.
Chapter 2
41
40
Recently, Song et al.,27
have synthesized several series of urea (A), carbamate (B),
amide (C), sulphanamide (D) and oxalamide (E) derivatives based on benzhydrilpiperazine
scaffold and tested for CB1 receptor binding affinity. The SAR studies to optimize the CB1
binding affinity led to the potent urea derivatives. After the additional SAR studies to
optimize the substituents of diphenyl rings, the combination of 2-chlorophenyl and 4-
chlorophenyl d turned out to be the most potent scaffold.
Chapter 2
42
N
HN
N
N
NHO
R4
R1
R2
R3
R1
R2
R3
N
N
O
R1
R2
R3
R5
N
N
O O-R6
N
N
S R7O
O
N
N
O
O
R8
i
ii
iii
iv
v
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
a.R1=R2=R3=Clb.R1=R3=Cl, R2=Hc.R1=R2=Cl, R2=Hd.R1=Cl, R2=R3=He.R1=Me R2=R3=Hf.R1=CF3 R2=R3=H
g.R1=R2=H,R3=Clh.R1=R3=Cl,R3=H
A
B
C
D
E
where: (i) R4-NCO, TEA, DCM, rt; (ii) R5-COOH, DCC, HOBt, DMF, rt; (iii) R6-OCOCl, TEA,
DCM, 0 0C- rt; (iv) R7-SO2Cl, TEA, DCM, rt; (v) R8-NH2, (COCl)2, TEA, DCM, 0
0C- rt.
Chapter 2
43
Yung et al.,28
have synthesized a series of hydrazones of 1-phenyl-, 1-benzyl-, and
1-benzhydril-4-aminopiperazines and evaluated for antimicrobial activity. Among the
synthesized molecules, 1-benzhydril-4-isonicotinylideneaminopiperazine 41 showed
broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity.
41
Press et al.,29
have synthesized a series of purine derivatives and evaluated for
their selective inotropic activity. Thioether-linked derivatives were superior to their
oxygen and nitrogen isosteres. Substitution of electron withdrawing groups on benzhydril
moiety of these agents increased the potency. Compound 42, carsatrin showed good
activity.
42
Chapter 2
44
2.1.1c. Benzylpiperazine:
An honored scaffold among arylpiperazine derivatives
Benzylpiperazine belongs to the arylpiperazine family and is commonly referred to
as BZP, an N-monosubstituted piperazine derivative available as either base or the
hydrochloride salt. The base form is a slightly yellowish-green liquid. The hydrochloride
salt is a white solid. BZP base is corrosive and causes burns. The salt form of BZP is an
irritant to eyes, respiratory system and skin. BZP was first synthesized in 1944 as a
potential antihelminthic (anti-parasitic) agent for use in farm animals. It was subsequently
shown to possess antidepressant activity.
Benzylpiperazine
Benzylpiperazine possess a wide range of pharmacological properties. Chemists
have wide variety of options, to synthesize biologically active derivatives of
benzylpiperazine, by keeping the benzyl/substituted benzyl group at one end of the
piperazine and substituting the various substituents including substituents which have
biological importance at the other end of the piperazine ring. Derivatives of
benzylpiperazine which exhibit wide range of biological activities are summarized below:
Bozsing et al.,30
have synthesized novel pyrimidine derivatives of benzylpiperazine
for their evaluation of 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor binding affinity and found that
compounds with 5-benzylpyrimidine derivative 43 showed substantially higher affinity
compared to the other analogues in the series. The introduction of N-benzylpiperazine
moiety on the 4, 6-diamino-2-thiopyrimidine moiety results in the increase in affinity
towards 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor. In continuation of this work, they have also
synthesized (3-trifluoromethylbenzyl)piperazine derivatives by varying substituents in the
position-2 of the pyrimidine benzyl group. Among the synthesized compounds, 44 is
found to be the most potent in this series and has a 15-fold 5-HT2C/2A selectivity and they
Chapter 2
45
have opined that this may be due to the presence of 2-trifluoromethyl group at the
position-2 in the pyrimidine benzyl group.
Zhao et al.,31
have synthesized 2-[4-(4-chloro-benzyl)-piperazin-1-yl]-1-(2-methyl-
2,3-dihydro-indol-1-yl)ethanone with chlorine atom at 4-position on the benzyl group 45
and 2-[4-(4-methyl-benzyl)-piperazin-1-yl]-1-(2-methyl-2,3-dihydro-indol-1-yl)ethanone
with methyl group at 4-position on the benzyl group 46 and reported as potent mixed
D2/D4 antagonists. It is believed that chlorine and methyl groups at 4-position on the
benzyl group is held responsible for the above said activity.
In continuation of the same work, the same authors also reported 32
the chiral
synthesis of indoline and piperazine containing derivatives, (R)-2-[4-(4-chloro-
benzylmethyl)piperazin-1-yl]-1-(2-methyl-2,3-dihydro-indol-1-yl)ethanone and reported
as novel class of D2/D4 antagonists. They have also studied the effect of chirality and
benzyl group substitution. Among the synthesized compounds, 47 with methyl group at 4-
Chapter 2
46
position and 48 with chlorine at 4-position and methoxy groups at 2-position showed
good activity.
Foster et al.,33
have synthesized a series of N,N-dibenzylpiperzines by introducing
substituents on the benzyl group to enhance their anticocaine activity. In this series of
compounds, 49 with chlorine atom at 3-position on the benzyl group showed greatest
sigma-2-affinity and good anticocaine activity.
49
Younes et al.,34
have synthesized simple piperazines. Amongst the synthesized
analogues, 1-benzyl-4-(2-napthyl)piperazine 50 demonstrated good affinity for sigma-1-
receptors, and weak antagonism of the locomotor effects of stimulants
(methamphetamine).
50
Bucle et al.,35
have synthesized several N-benzylpiperazino derivatives of
[1]benzopyrano[2,3-d]-1,2,3-triazol-9(1H)-one and its 5-methyl homologue and evaluated
Chapter 2
47
for their antihistamine activity on guinea pig ileum. Among the synthesized compounds,
6-[3-[4-(4-chlorobenzyl)-1-piperazinyl]propoxy][1]benzopyrano[2,3-d]-1,2,3-triazol-9(1H)-
one 51, showed most potent activity against histamine on guinea pig ileum, comparable
to that of mepyramine. In this series, chlorinated derivatives were more potent than
methyl or methoxy group containing derivatives.
51
Ohataka et al.,36
have reported the quantitative structure cerebral vasodilating
activity relationships of 1-benzyl-4-(3-hydroxy-3-phenylpropyl) piperazine derivatives. The
analyses indicate that potency depends on the number of methoxyl groups on the benzyl
moiety and also lipophilicity of substituent is to be important with respect to the activity.
Among the derivatives studied, two derivatives 52 and 53 were found to be more potent
where: 52. Y= 2,3,4-tri-OCH3
53. Y= 3,4,5-tri-OCH3
Ohataka et al.,37
have synthesized a series of ester derivatives of 1-benzyl-4-
piperazineacetic acid and evaluated as antinuclear agents. The QSAR analyses for the
esters revealed that the antinuclear activity of these compounds were considered to be
based on the cycloprotective activity, the most active and least toxic derivatives, 54 and
55 were selected for further study.
Chapter 2
48
54
N N
MeO
MeO OO
OCH3
OMe
55
Hernandez et al.,38
have synthesized two series of analogues of novel human
mitochondrial thymidine kinase inhibitors, 1-[(Z)-4-(triphenylmethoxy)-2-butenyl]thymine
were synthesized by replacing trimethoxy moiety by a variety of substituted amines and
carboxamides. The selectivity in all the cases against the mitochondrial enzyme was either
maintained or improved and several derivatives including benzylpiperazine moiety, 56
showed modest potent activity.
56
Dundar et al.,39
have synthesized some 1-[4-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1,3-(benzoxazole-
3-yl)butanoyl]-4-arylpiperazine derivatives 57 and evaluated antinociceptive activity. The
distance between the amide nitrogen of piperazine ring and the nitrogen atom located at
position 3 of 2(3H)-benzoxazole increased to four carbon atoms, antinociceptive activity
was also increased.
Chapter 2
49
57
where R = phenyl, benzyl, fluorophenyl, chlorophenyl, pyridyl.
Asaki et al.,40
have synthesized a series of 3-substituted benzamide derivatives
structurally related to STI-571 (imatinib mesylate) 58, a Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor
used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and evaluated for antiproliferative activity
against the Bcr-Abl-positive leukemia cell line K562.
58
Chaudhary et al.,41
have synthesized cyano derivatives of N-alkyl and N-aryl
piperazines and screened for antibacterial and antifungal activities. All the synthesized
compounds showed the antibacterial activity against pathogenic strains of Staphylococcus
aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptomyces epidermidis and Escherichia coli and
antifungal activity against pathogenic strains of Aspergillus fumigates, Aspergillus flavus
and Aspergillus niger. All compounds showed mild to moderate antimicrobial activity.
However, compound, 59 showed potent antibacterial activity against pathogenic strains
used in the study.
59
Chapter 2
50
Turkmen et al.,42
have synthesized a series of sulfonamides by reacting
sulfanilamide or 5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-sulfonamide with X-chloroalkanoyl chlorides,
followed by replacement of the X-chlorine atom with secondary amines. Tails
incorporating heterocyclic amines belonging to the morpholine, piperidine and piperazine
ring systems have been attached to these sulfonamides, by means of an alkanoyl-
carboxamido linker containing from two to five carbon atoms. The new derivatives
prepared in this way were tested as inhibitors of three carbonic anhydrase isozymes, the
cytosolic isozymes CA I and II, and the catalytic domain of the transmembrane, tumor-
associated isozyme CA IX. Several low nanomolar CA I and CA II inhibitors were detected
both in the aromatic and heterocyclic sulfonamide series, whereas the best hCA IX
inhibitors (inhibition constants in the range of 22–35nM) all belonged to the
acetazolamide-like derivatives 60.
60
N, N-Dialkylditihiocarbamate derivatives have been well known as broad-range
fungicides. Ozkirimli et al.,43
have synthesized, the triazole derivatives of N,N-
disubstituted dithiocarbamates and evaluated for antifungal activity against M. canis, M.
gypseum, and T. rubrum. N, N-Dialkylditihiocarbamate containing benzylpiperazine 61
showed good activity.
61
Chapter 2
51
Hages et al.,44
have synthesized amide derivatives of benzylpiperazine and some
analogues of befuraline and piberaline were reported. All compounds have been tested
as antidepressive agents. According to the tests, some of the amides showed elevated
antidepressive activity.
Hashimoto et al.,45
have studied the neurotoxicity of 3,4-
methylenedioxymethatamine(MDMA) in rat brain neurotoxicity was attenuated
significantly by coadministration of several benzylpiperazines (p-nitrobenzylpiperazine, p-
chlorobenzylpiperazine and 1-piperonylpiperazine), which were weak inhibitors of [3H]6-
nitroquipazine binding to the (5-HT), 5-hydroxytryptamine transporter in rat brain. These
results suggest that benzylpiperazine may inhibit the MDMA-induced neurotoxicity by a
novel neuropharmacological effect other than 5-HT uptake inhibition.
Desai et al.,46
have synthesized a series of (4-ethylphenyl)-3,5-ditertiarybutyl-4-
hydroxybenzylamine, 1-phenyl-4-(3,5-ditertiarybutyl-4-hydroxybenzyl)piperazine, and 1-
(3,5-ditertiarybutyl-4-hydroxybenzyl)piperidine and characterized and a comparative
study of the synthesized antioxidants with the commercially available antioxidant 2,6-
ditertiarybutyl-4-methylphenol was made. The presence of phenolic and amino groups
influenced the performance of the antioxidants. The performance of the antioxidants
influenced the thermal stability of the PPCP (polypropylene copolymer).
Chapter 2
52
2.1.2. Current status of piperidine and its derivatives in the
field of bioorganic and medicinal chemistry
The piperidine and arylpiperidine scaffolds are found in many compounds that
have distinct pharmacological and therapeutic profiles. The piperidine nucleus can also be
frequently recognized in the structure of numerous naturally occurring alkaloid and
synthetic compounds with interesting biological and pharmacological properties. As a
consequence, the development of general methods for the synthesis of piperidine
derivatives have been the subject of considerable synthetic effort. Pharmacological action
of piperidine derivatives are represented below:
The piperidine motif is as wide-ranging in its therapeutic uses as it is ubiquitously
found in drugs and drug candidates. It is a key structural component of successful anti-
Parkinson’s drugs and drug candidates (e.g. Besonprodil,47
Budipine48-49
) and displays
antiviral,50
antipsychotic,51-53
metabolic,54-56
anti-inflammatory,57
and cognition disorders58
and antmicrobial activities.59-60
Piperidines offered by group of common elements of
biogenic amine regulated GPCRs, which includes the large family of serotonin, dopamine,
histamine, and glutamic acid receptors.
Chapter 2
53
Figure 2.2.: Some representative examples of arylpiperidine derivatives being used as
pharmaceutical drugs.
Among piperidine derivatives, arylpiperdine derivatives showed various kinds of
biological activities in the field of medicinal chemistry. Chemists have synthesized various
substituted arylpiperidine derivatives by varying the aryl/substitution at various positions
of piperidine ring with respect to the nitrogen atom of the piperidine ring. The biological
activity of arylpiperidine derivatives are summarized as follows:
Chapter 2
54
Sugimoto et al.,61
have synthesized indanone derivatives and studied the anti-
Ache activity, derivative, 62 with electron releasing methoxyl group at the 3-position
increased the activity by 20-fold, compared to 2- and 4 –positions.
62
Willoughby et al.,62
reported the preparation of a combinatorial library of
arylpropyl piperidine derivatives with potent CCR5 binding affinity. Compounds with
novel combinations of subunits were discovered that have high binding affinity for the
CCR5 receptor. A potent CCR5 antagonist from the library, compound 63 was found to
have potent binding and moderate antiviral activity, which would be due to the aliphatic
cyclohexyl substituent, the aryl propyl piperidine side chain and the pyrrolidine scaffold in
combination.
63
Chapter 2
55
Pissarnitski et al.,63
have synthesized a series of novel piperidine derivative as γ-
secretase inhibitors, potentially useful for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Since the
introduction of a fluorine atom in the aromatic region of compound 64 and cis-
stereochemistry of the substituents at the piperidine ring was established as a
requirement for the potency.
.
64
Ting et al.,64
have synthesized a novel series of dual NK1/NK2 receptor antagonists,
based on the 2-oxo-(1, 4’-bipiperidine) template. Compound 65 with N-methylacetamide
side chain on 2-oxo-(1,4’-bipiperidine) is a potent dual NK1/NK2 antagonist and
demonstrates excellent in vivo activity and good oral plasma levels in the dog.
65
Chapter 2
56
Wang et al.,65
have synthesized a number of highly potent M2 receptor antagonists
with >100-fold selectivity against the M1 and M3 receptor subtypes. In the rat
microdialysis assay, this series of compounds showed pronounced enhancement of brain
acetylcholine release after oral administration. Among them compound 66 demonstrated
that the M2 antagonists upon oral administration, stimulated brain acetylcholine release
in functional microdialysis assay.
66
Ramalingan et al.,66
have synthesized some novel benzoxazolylethoxypiperidones
and tested for their antibacterial activity against Streptococcus faecalis, Bacillus subtilis,
Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aureuginosa and antifungal
activity against Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, Candida-51 and Aspergillus flavus
were evaluated. Compounds 67, 68, and 69 exerted potent in vitro antibacterial activity
against Streptococcus faecalis while compounds 70 and 71 exhibited potent in vitro
antifungal activity against Candida-51.
Chapter 2
57
Burgey et al.,67
identified the piperidinyl-azabenzimidazolone and
phenylimidazolinone as alternative privileged structures which when incorporated into
the benzodiazepine core afford potent CGRP (Calcitonin gene-related peptide) receptor
antagonists. Among them, compound 72, in which introduction of the ring containing
nitrogen serves to improve potency by 100-fold.
R= 4-AZA
72
Dutta et al.,68
have synthesized several analogs of the potent and selective
dopamine transporter (DAT) ligand 4-[2-(diphenylmethoxy)ethyl]-1-benzylpiperidine and
biologically evaluated at the dopamine and serotonin transporter (SERT) sites. Several
substituents were introduced into the aromatic rings to evaluate the influences of
electronic and steric interactions in their binding to the DAT. All the novel analogs showed
preferential interaction at the DAT compared with the SERT. Different aromatic
substitutions in the phenyl ring of the N-benzyl part of the molecule played a key role in
the selectivity. In general, compounds with strong electronwithdrawing substituents were
most active and selective at the DAT. The influence of electronic factors was indicated to
Chapter 2
58
some extent by these results since the compounds containing the most electronegative
atom (F) 73 and electron-withdrawing group (NO2) 74 showed maximal preferential
interaction at the DAT. Bioisosteric replacement of one of the phenyl rings of the
diphenylmethoxy moiety by a thiophene ring was tolerated well and produced the most
potent compound 75 in the series. Furthermore, these results also may indicate the
possible existence of complimentary electropositive/electron accepting sites on the DAT
to favour the observed interaction and vice versa on SERT.
73 74 75
Sugimoto et al.,69
have synthesized a new series of 1-benzyl-4-[2-(N-benzoyl-N-
methylamino)ethyl]piperidine derivatives and evaluated as potent anti-
acetylcholinesterase (anti-AChE) activity. Introduction of a phenyl group on the nitrogen
atom of the amide moieties resulted in enhanced activity. The rigid analogue containing
isoindolone was found to exhibit potent anti-AChE activity. Furthermore, replacement of
the isoindolone with other heterobicyclic ring systems was examined. Among the
compounds prepared in these series, 1-benzyl-4-[2-[4-(benzoylamino)phthalimido]ethyl]
piperidine hydrochloride is the most potent inhibitor of AChE. Compound 76 showed a
definite selectivity to AChE.
76
Chapter 2
59
Romero et al., 70
reported a novel class of bis(heteroaryl)piperazine (BHAP)
analogs which possess the ability to inhibit NNRTI (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase
inhibitor) resistant recombinant HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) and NNRTI resistant
variants of HIV-1 has been identified via targeted screening. Further structural
modifications were required to inhibit metabolism and modulate solubility in order to
obtain compounds with the desired biological profile as well as appropriate
pharmaceutical properties. In particular, substituting an ethyl for a methyl group on the
aminopiperidine spacer enhanced the desired activities. The AAP-BHAPs with the most
suitable characteristics were compounds 77, 78, and 79.
77. R=CH3
78. R= CH2CH3 79
Contreras et al.,71
have synthesized a series of 3-amino-6-phenylpyridazines and
tested for inhibition of AChE. Among all the derivatives investigated, 3-[2-(1-
benzylpiperidin-4-yl)ethylamino]-6-phenylpyridazine 80, was found to be one of the most
potent anti-AChE inhibitors, representing a 5000-fold increase in potency compared to
weak, competitive and reversible acetylcholinesterase. Among the different analogs
tested, it is remarkable to notice that the highest potency is associated with the N-
benzylpiperidine ethyl moiety.
Chapter 2
60
80
2.1.2a. Effect of presence of benzyl group at 4th
position of the piperidine
scaffold:
In the literature, 62,68
the aryl group at 4th
position of the piperidine ring with
respect to the nitrogen atom of the piperidine ring showed broad range of activities.
Among, them 4-benzylpiperidne derivatives showed good biological activity and are
summarized as follows:
Imamura et al.,72
synthesized and reported a novel lead compound, N-{3-[4-(4-
fluorobenzoyl)piperidin-1-yl]propyl}-1-methyl-5-oxo-N-phenylpyrrolidine-3-carboxamide,
81 and identified as a CCR5 antagonist. In an effort to improve the binding affinity of the
lead molecule, a series of 5-oxopyrrolidine-3-carboxamides were synthesized.
Introduction of 3,4-dichloro substituents to the central phenyl ring 82 and 83, or
replacing the 1-methyl group of the 5-oxopyrrolidine moiety with a 1-benzyl group 84 was
found to be effective for improving CCR5 affinity.
81
NN
O
N
O
R4
Me
CH2
Cl
Cl
Chapter 2
61
82. R4= H
83. R4= F
84
Mamolo et al.,73
have synthesized 3H-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-one derivatives and tested
for their in vitro antimycobacterial activity. Oxadiazolone derivatives, 85 in which
conjugation with 4-benzyl piperidine showed an interesting antimycobacterial activity
against the tested strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
85
McCauley et. al.,74
have synthesized two classes of 5-substituted benzimidazoles
by using derivatives of 4-benzylpiperidine and identified as potent antagonists of various
receptors. Among them, 86 having piperidine class showed good activity in the
carrageenan-induced mechanical hyperalgesia assay in rats as well as excellent
pharmacokinetic behavior in dogs.
86
Borza et. al.,75
have synthesized a novel series of benzimidazole-2-carboxamide
derivatives and reported as NR2B selective NMDA receptor antagonists. The influence of
some structural elements like, H-bond donor groups placed on the benzimidazole
Chapter 2
62
skeleton and the substitution pattern of the piperidine ring, on the biological activity was
reported. The compound 87 showed excellent analgetic activity.
X =5(6)-OH
87
In continuation of the work, the above authors76
also synthesized (4-
benzylpiperidine-1-yl)-(6-hydroxy-1H-indole-2-yl)methanone derived from (E)-1-(4-
benzylpieridin-1-yl)-3-(4-hydroxy-phenyl)-propenone and identified as potent antagonist
of the NMDA receptor. Several derivatives 88 and 89 of the above compound showed
nanomolar activity both in the binding and in the functional assay.
88. Q=6- OH
89. Q=5(6)-OH
In the literature there are many more NMDA receptors are reported such as, CI-
1041 77
90, Ifenprodil (Ro-25-6981)78
91.
(CI-1041) 90 (Ifenprodil) 91
Chapter 2
63
Ting et. al.,79
have synthesized bipiperidine amide 92 and 93 which has been
identified as a CC chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) antagonist. (enant B), which exhibits
potent receptor affinity and inhibition of both calcium flux and eosinophil chemotaxis
than the bipipiperidine amide. An incremental improvement in the biological activity was
observed with modification of the bipiperidine core, in particular, substitution was well
tolerated at the 3-position (hydroxylmethyl) of the second piperidine ring.
92
93
Wright et al.,80
have synthesized a series of bicyclic heterocyclic systems
containing p-hydrogen donor, in which phenolic moiety was replaced by heterocyclic
systems, in particular, compound 5-[3-(4-benzylpiperidin-1-yl)prop-1-ynyl]-1,3-
dihydrobenzoimidazol-2-one 94 found to be very potent, selective NR1A/2B receptor
antagonist.
94
Chapter 2
64
Shaw et al.,81
reported the in vivo properties of a series of 2-arylindole NK1
antagonists have been improved, by modification of the amide substituent. The 1-(2-
methoxyphenyl)piperazine amide was identified as a major area of metabolism in the
lead compound 95. Replacement of this amine moiety by a 4-benzyl-4-hydroxypiperidine
resulted with reduced clearance and improved central duration of action in compound
96.
95 96
Wacker et al.,82
synthesized the CCR3 antagonist leads with IC50 values in the mM
range were converted into low nM binding compounds that displayed in vitro inhibition of
human eosinophil chemotaxis induced by human eotaxin. In particular, 4-benzylpiperidin-
1-yl-n-propylureas 97 and erythro-3-(4-benzyl-2-(α-hydroxyalkyl)piperidin-1-yl)-n-
propylureas 98 exhibited single digit nanomolar
97 98
Novak et al.,83
have synthesized N, N-disubstituted amides of long-chain fatty acids
were screened for antimicrobial activity against bacteria, yeasts, and molds. N-oleoyl-4-
benzylpiperidine exhibit a moderate spectrum of antimicrobial activity.
Zia-ur-Rehman et al.,84
Synthesised new tri-, chlorodi- and diorganotin (IV)
dithiocarboxylates of 4-benzylpiperidine-1-carbodithioate ligand (L), A subsequent
antimicrobial study indicates that the compounds are biologically active.
Chapter 2
65
2.2. Present Work
2.2.1. Design and Selection of Piperazine and Piperidine Moieties
as Heterocyclic Precursors:
As anchored earlier in the introductory part, derivatives of piperazine and
piperidine motifs are the most reoccurring structural frameworks in the field of
heterocyclic chemistry. Currently, there are avalanche of successful examples of these
derivatives as versatile drug candidates in modern drug discovery. In light of achieving
this, several researchers have shown that upon varying numerous pharmacophores to
secondary nitrogen of piperazine and piperidine with different functional groups such as
amides, sulfonamides, urea, carbamates, oxalamides etc,. This exemplifies that
modification of similar kind of insertion will fetch fruitful results in developing novel lead
molecules in the near future.
In the literature, there appear ample avenues to synthesize biologically active
piperazine derivatives by keeping various commonly encountered moieties such as
substituted derivatives of alkyl, cyclohexyl, phenyl, benzyl, benzhydril and various
heterocycles on one of the nitrogen atoms of the piperazine moiety and varying
numerous substitutions on other nitrogen atom of piperazine. Amongst, benzyl and
benzhydril moieties are versatile groups which are already in use worldwide as potent
drugs for the ailment of many devastating diseases.
Benzhydril group on the piperazine ring plays a paramount role in elucidating the
biological activities of these derivatives upon conjugation with other analogues.
Benzhydrilpiperazine belongs to the arylpiperazine family and their derivatives possess a
wide range of pharmacological properties. Hence, chemists have new horizons which
paves way to synthesize biologically active derivatives of benzhydrilpiperazine by coupling
various substituents on one of the nitrogen atoms of the piperazine moiety and without
replacing the benzhydril group at the other end of the piperazine and they have
Chapter 2
66
succeeded in obtaining the compounds with marked enhancement in the biological
activity compared to the conventional drugs. Also, it is believed that the pharmacological
activity of benzhydrilpiperazine derivatives is attributed due to the presence of two
nitrogen atoms on the piperazine ring.
In continuation of the above, there is an another class of arylpiperazine
compounds ie., benzylpiperazine moiety, which has come across in various reports
emphasizing biological importance. Here also, the presence of aromatic benzene ring on
one end and the subsequent insertion of various substituents on the other end of the
piperazine play a vital role in bringing about the marked change in the biological
properties.
Considering the importance of both benzhydril and benzyl substitutions on
piperazine skeleton, we are very much projected in evaluating the effect of these two
groups on the similar type of piperazine analogues.
On the other hand, piperidines are the class of compounds which exhibits
innumerable number of pharmacological properties which has led to its discovery in
much distinctive therapeutics. Particularly, it is very much evident from earlier research
that substitutions have been made on different position of the piperidine ring in hoping
to achieve novel molecules. Of these, when the substitution is an aryl group in particular
on the 4th
position of the piperidine ring exhibited highest biological activity. In this
connection, we have selected 4-benzyl piperidine as one more class of the heterocyclic
precursors for our study.
2.2.2. Motivation for the Conjugation of Amino Acid Residues:
Amino acids are the fundamental components of living organisms playing a crucial
role both as building blocks of proteins and as intermediates in metabolism. The diverse
functionalities of amino acid residues which can be a polar and/or non-polar, have both
hydrophilic and lipophilic regions and have a negative, positive or neutral net charge are
ought to play very unique and important role in various protein-protein, peptide-protein,
Chapter 2
67
proteins-receptors, enzyme interactions in the human body. Considering the low toxicity,
biocompatibility, likeliness and favored interaction of amino acidic residues with the
biological system, currently there is huge tendency of conjugating amino acid/peptidic
residues with small bioactive molecules in the field of biomedical research.30-42
In
particular, the scope for the conjugation of amino acids with the bioactive heterocyclic
motifs is on rise due the favorable pharmacological effects exerted by the combined
framework of heterocyclic moiety and varying side chains of amino acids on the specified
sites of biological targets. It is reported that a simple known coupling reaction between
amino acids and heterocycles has resulted in the products of biological importance and in
many cases some heterocycles linked to amino acidic residues showed enhanced
biological activity more than standard drugs. Furthermore, there are several successful
evidences available in the literature signifying the importance of amino acid conjugation
in improving the potency, selectivity, low toxicity, in vivo stability, solubility and high cell
permeability of the bioactive heterocycles.
In today’s medicine amino acids continue to grow in popularity for their potential
use in drug therapy. Amino acid-based drugs are any substance that uses the different
amino acids to diagnose, prevent and treat diseases and conditions to restore or maintain
normal body functions. These have led to the discovery of numerous amino acids based
drugs of therapeutic potential, a number of which are already applied clinically. Till to
date there appears to be no reports available in the literature on amino acids conjugated
benzhydrilpiperazine. Upon triggered over this, we owed to couple various Nα-protected
Boc-L-amino acids with one of the nitrogens available on the benzhydrilpiperazine. In this
view, we would be able to elicit whether amino acid residues play a role in enhancing the
activity of the synthesized compounds after conjugation in general and also in particular
any residue/group would be held responsible for the activity.
In view of all the above facts and considering biological importance of amino acid
conjugation with the bioactive heterocycles, we are very much projected on design,
synthesis and biological evaluation of new series of amino acid conjugated
Chapter 2
68
benzhydrilpiperazine (Analogues-I), benzylpiperazine (Analogues-II) and 4-
benzylpiperidine (Analogues-III) derivatives. The representative structural frame works of
the synthesized compounds are here picturized below (Scheme 2.1 - 2.3).
The heterocyclic precursors have been either synthesized according to literature
methods or were procured commercially. The Nα-Boc protected amino acids were coupled
with aforesaid heterocyclic precursors using EDCI/HOBt as coupling agent and NMM as base.
The synthesized amino acid conjugates have been subjected to different analytical and
spectroscopic techniques in order to conformity of the structures like, elemental analysis and
1H NMR. The Boc deprotected compounds were screened for antibacterial, antifungal and
antioxidant activities. Antibacterial studies included gram +ve bacteria like Staphylococcus
aureus and various gram –ve strains like Escherichia coli, Klebesiella pneumoniae and
Pseudomonas auregenosa where as anti fungal assay employs Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus
flavus and Fusarium monoliforme. Both antibacterial and antifungal studies were carried by
agar well diffusion method. Also, the compounds have been screened for DPPH radical
scavenging effect as an antioxidant assay.
Chapter 2
69
O OH Cl N NH
b
N N
O
R
NH
O
O
+
O
HO
R
HN
O
O
d
Where R = Side chain of amino acids (Gly, Ala, Val, Leu, Phe, Glu, Lys, Arg, His, Trp, Asn, Pro)
I II III IV
V(a-l)
N N
O
R
NH2..HCl
VI(a-l)
e
a-l
a c
Reagents and conditions (a) NaBH4, methanol, rt, 5 hrs. (b) SOCl2, DCM, 0-50C, 4 hrs.
(c)Piperazine, K2CO3, DMF, 800C, 8 hrs. (d) EDCI, HOBt, NMM,
DMF, -15 0C, 24 hrs. (e) 4N HCl/dioxane
Scheme 2.1: Synthesis of amino acids conjugated bezhydrilpiperazine derivatives (Analogues-I)
Chapter 2
70
Chapter 2
71
NHNHBoc
OH
O N
NHBoc
O
N
NH2.HCl
O
b
+a
Scheme-2.3: Synthesis of amino acids conjugated 4-benzylpiperidine derivatives (Analogues-III)
R
RR
XII a-l XIII(a-l)
XIV(a-l)
Where R = Side chain of amino acids (Gly, Ala, Val, Leu, Phe, Glu, Ile, Arg, Lys, His, Trp, Pro)
Reagents and Conditions (a) EDCI, HOBt, NMM, DMF, -15 0C, 24 hrs. (b) 4N HCl /dioxane
Chapter 2
72
2.3. Experimental
2.3.1. Materials and Methods:
All the amino acids used were of L-configuration unless mentioned. All Boc-amino
acids and HOBt were purchased from Advanced Chem. Tech. (Louisville, Kentuky, USA).
EDCI and NMM were purchased from Sigma Chemicals Co. (St. Louis, MO). All the solvents
and reagents used for the synthesis and analysis were of analytical grade. TLC was carried
out on precoated silica gel plates prepared in laboratory using
chloroform/methanol/acetic acid (95:5:3, 85:15:3) as solvent systems. 4-Benzylpiperidine
(XII) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich India. 1H NMR spectra were obtained on a 400
MHz Bruker FT-NMR Spectrometer instrument by using DMSO/CDCl3 as solvent and TMS
as an internal standard. Elemental analysis was obtained by using VARIO EL III CHNS
Elementar.
2.3.2. Synthesis
2.3.2.1. Synthesis of heterocyclic precursors:
2.3.2.1.1. Synthesis of benzhydrilpiperazine (IV):
Synthesis of benzhydrol (II) from benzophenone (I):
Benzophenone (10.92g, 60 mmol) was dissolved in 250 mL of methanol and
cooled to 0 0C. NaBH4 (2.16 g, 60 mmol) was added to the above solution at 0
0C for 1 hr
and the reaction mixture was stirred further at rt for 4 hrs. Then, methanol was distilled
under reduced pressure. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (100 mL), the
product was extracted with diethyl ether (300 mL) and the organic phase was washed
with 1N HCl, followed by a saturated NaHCO3 and finally with water. It was dried over
anhydrous sodium sulphate and evaporated under vacuum to obtain benzhydrol (II, 9.93
g, 90%), M. P. 67-68 0C (lit. 66-68
0C).
85
Chapter 2
73
Synthesis of benzhydrilchloride (III) from benzhydrol (II):
The bezhydrol (9.2 g, 50 mmol) was dissolved in DCM (50 mL) and thionyl chloride
(4.3 mL, 60 mmol) was added dropwise to the solution for 30 minutes at 0-5 0C. The
reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 hrs. The reaction mixture was
concentrated under reduced pressure to remove thionyl chloride and DCM, again and
again washed the reaction mixture (4-5 times) with 50mL of DCM; finally the DCM extract
was distilled under reduced pressure, which gives an yellow liquid, Yield (9.1 mL, 90%),
B.P. 138-139 0C (lit-139-140
0C).
85
Synthesis of benzhydrilpiperazine (IV) from benzhydrilchloride (III):
Benzhydrilchloride (8.0 mL, 45 mmol) was added dropwise to the stirred solution
of piperazine (38.74 g, 450 mmol) and potassium carbonate (12.24 g, 90 mmol) in DMF.
The reaction was heated to 80 0C for 8 hrs and monitored by TLC. Upon completion of
reaction, after filtration, the solvent was removed under vaccum. The residue was
dissolved in ethylacetate, washed with water and brine, dried over anhydrous sodium
sulphate and evaporated. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel (60-120 mesh),
chloroform: methanol (9:1) to afford 1-benzhydrilpiperazine a white powder with an yield
(9.63 g, 95%), M.P. 89-910C (lit.91-92
0C).
85
2.3.2.1.2. Synthesis of benzylpiperazine (IX):
Benzylchloride (7.45 mL, 65 mmol) was added dropwise to the stirred solution of
piperazine (55.90 g, 650 mmol) and potassium carbonate (17.68 g, 130 mmol) in DMF.
The reaction was heated to 80 0C for 8 hrs and monitored by TLC. Upon completion of
reaction, after filtration, the solvent was removed under vaccum. The residue was
dissolved in ethylacetate, washed with water and brine, dried over anhydrous sodium
sulphate and evaporated. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel (60-120 mesh),
chloroform: methanol (9:1) to afford 1-benzylpiperazine with an yield (9.88 g, 95%), B.P.
146-147 0C (lit.145-147
0C).
85
Chapter 2
74
2.3.2.2. General procedure for the coupling of Nα-Boc amino acids with
heterocycles (IV, IX and XII):
To the stirred solution of Nα-Boc-amino acid (2 mmol) and HOBt (0.31 g, 2 mmol) in
DMF (10 mL) cooled to 0 0C, added NMM (0.22 mL, 2 mmol). The mixture was further
cooled to -15 0C ± 1
0C and added EDCI (0.39 g, 2 mmol) and heterocyclic precursors (IV,
IX, XII, 2 mmol). After 20 minutes, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 8 by the
addition of NMM and the reaction mixture was stirred overnight while slowly warming to
rt. The reaction mixture was quenched with water (2 mL) and the solvent was condensed.
The residue was dissolved in chloroform (25 mL), washed with 5% NaHCO3 (3 x 20 mL),
H2O (1 x 20 mL) followed by 0.1N cold HCl (3 x 20 mL) and brine solution (3 x 20 mL), dried
over anhydrous Na2SO4. The chloroform was removed under reduced pressure to obtain
the desired products (Va-Vl, Xa-Xl and XIIIa-XIIIl). The analytical data of these compounds
are presented in Table-2.1-2.3.
2.3.2.3. Deprotection of Boc group:
The Boc group of the synthesized compounds (1 mmol) was deblocked by treating
with 4N HCl in dioxane (10 mL / g of the compound) for 1.5 hours. Excess HCl and dioxane
were removed under reduced pressure, triturated with ether, filtered, washed with ether
and dried to afford hydrochloride salts of amino acid conjugated heterocycles (VIa-VIl,
XIa-XIl and XIVa-XIVl), Yield (100%). These compounds were used for the antimicrobial
studies.
Ch
ap
ter
2
75
Ta
ble
2.1
: A
na
lyti
cal
an
d S
pe
ctro
sco
pic
Da
ta o
f th
e S
yn
the
size
d C
om
po
un
ds
(An
alo
gu
es-
I)
En
try
Sid
e c
ha
in o
f a
min
o a
cid
s
(R)
Rf
va
lue
Yie
ld
(%)
Mo
lecu
lar
form
ula
Ele
me
nta
l a
na
lysi
s (%
)
Fo
un
d
(Ca
lcu
late
d)
1H
-NM
R (
CD
Cl 3
), δ
pp
m
C
H
N
Va
H
0
.47
9
0
C2
4H
31N
3O
3
70
.41
(70
.43
)
7.6
1
(7.6
3)
10
.25
(10
.26
)
7.0
5-7
.25
(m
, 1
0H
, A
r-H
);
1.3
9 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.9
1 (
s,
1H
, N
H-G
ly);
4.6
0 (
s, 1
H,
-
CH
-);
2.8
4
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
2.6
0 (
t, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 3
.9 (
s,
2H
, α
CH
2).
Vb
CH3
0
.43
9
5
C2
5H
33N
3O
3
70
.90
(70
.91
)
7.8
0
(7.8
1)
9.9
2
(9.9
2)
7.0
5-7
.25
(m
, 1
0H
, A
r-H
);
1.3
9 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.9
3 (
s,
1H
, N
H-A
la);
4.6
2 (
s, 1
H,
-
CH
-);
2.8
8
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
2.6
2
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.33
(q,
1H
, α
CH
); 1
.25
(d
, 3
H,
βC
H3).
Vc
CH3
CH3
0.4
5
93
C
27H
37N
3O
3
71
.82
(71
.83
)
8.2
0
(8.2
2)
9.2
9
(9.3
0)
7.0
5-7
.27
(m
, 1
0H
, A
r-H
);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.9
0 (
s,
1H
, N
H);
4.6
5 (
s, 1
H,
-CH
-
Va
l);
2.8
4
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
2.6
0
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.51
(d,
1H
, α
CH
-);
1.7
1
(m,
1H
, β
CH
-);
1.2
5
(d,
6H
,
γCH
3).
Ch
ap
ter
2
76
Vd
C H2
CH
CH3
CH3
0.4
5
91
C
28H
39N
3O
3
72
.24
(72
.25
)
8.4
0
(8.4
2)
9.0
2
(9.0
3)
7.0
9-7
.23
(m
, 1
0H
, A
r-H
);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.9
0 (
s,
1H
, N
H-L
eu
); 4
.60
(s,
1H
, -
CH
-);
2.8
5
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
2.4
9 (
t, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.50
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
1.7
0
(t,
2H
,
βC
H2-)
; 1
.50
(m
, 1
H,
-γC
H-
); 1
.25
(d
, 6
H,
δC
H3).
Ve
H2C
0.5
0
85
C
31H
37N
3O
3
74
.50
(74
.52
)
7.4
5
(7.4
6)
8.4
1
(8.4
2)
7.0
6-7
.45
(m
, 1
5H
, A
r-H
);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.9
8 (
s,
1H
, N
H-P
he
); 4
.62
(s,
1H
,
-CH
-);
2.9
0 (
t, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
;
2.6
2 (
t, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.58
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
3.3
5
(d,
2H
,
βC
H2-)
.
Vf
H2
CC H2
CO
OH2
C
0.3
7
90
C
34H
41N
3O
5
71
.44
(71
.45
)
7.2
2
(7.2
3)
7.3
3
(7.3
5)
7.0
4-7
.37
(m
, 1
5H
, A
r-H
);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.8
0 (
s,
1H
, N
H-G
lu);
4.6
4 (
t, 1
H,
-
CH
-);
2.8
5
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
2.5
4 (
t, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.41
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
1.8
9 (
m,
2H
, -
βC
H2-)
; 2
.16
(t,
2H
, -γ
CH
2-
); 5
.36
(s,
2H
, C
H2-P
h).
Vg
N HO
O
0.4
1
88
C
36H
46N
4O
5
70
.32
(70
.33
)
7.5
2
(7.5
4)
9.1
0
(9.1
1)
7.0
6-7
.27
(m
, 1
5H
, A
r-H
);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.9
6 (
s,
1H
, N
H-L
ys)
; 4
.64
(s,
1H
, -
CH
-);
2.8
9
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
2.5
0(t
, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.51
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
1.5
5 (m
, 2
H,
βC
H2-)
; 1
.39
(m
, 2
H,
γCH
2-
Ch
ap
ter
2
77
);
1.4
8
(m,
2H
, δ
CH
2-)
;
2.4
2 (
t, 2
H,
εC
H2-)
; 4
.9 (
s,
2H
, C
H2),
8.0
0 (
s, 1
H,
NH
).
Vh
H2
CC H2
H2
CN H
N H
NO2
NH
0.3
5
90
C
28H
39N
7O
5
60
.73
(60
.74
)
7.0
8
(7.1
0)
17
.72
(17
.73
)
7.0
8-7
.25
(m
, 1
0H
, A
r-H
);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
8.0
0 (
s,
1H
, N
H-A
rg);
4.7
3 (
s, 1
H,
-
CH
-);
2.8
8
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
2.5
9(t
, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.54
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
1.5
0 (
m,
2H
,
βC
H2-)
; 1
.30
(m
, 2
H,
γCH
2-
); 2
.59
(t,
2H
, δ
CH
2-)
; 8
.0
(s,
1H
, N
H).
Vi
NN
H2C
H2
CO
H2
C
0.4
8
90
C
36H
43N
5O
4
70
.91
(70
.93
)
7.1
0
(7.1
1)
11
.48
(11
.49
)
7.0
4-7
.35
(d,
15
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
8.0
0 (
s,
1H
, N
H-H
is);
4.7
0 (
s, 1
H,
-
CH
-);
2.9
0
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
2.5
0(t
, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.65
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
3.2
0 (
d,
2H
, -
βC
H2-)
; 6
.55
(s,
2H
,
imid
azo
le);
4
.60
(s
, 2
H,
CH
2);
5.6
1 (
s, 2
H,
CH
2).
Vj
H2C
HN
0.5
1
92
C
33H
38N
4O
3
73
.56
(73
.58
)
7.0
6
(7.0
7)
10
.37
(10
.39
)
7.0
4-7
.30
(m
, 1
4H
, A
r-H
);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.8
0 (
s,
1H
, N
H-T
rp);
4.6
9 (
s, 1
H,
-
CH
-);
2.9
2
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
2.4
8 (
t, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.58
(s,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
3.1
9
(d,
2H
,
βC
H2-)
; 1
0.1
2 (s
, 1
H,
NH
ind
ole
); 6
.81
(d
, 1
H,
-CH
-).
Ch
ap
ter
2
78
VK
C H2
CNH2
O
0.4
4
94
C
26H
34N
4O
4
66
.91
(66
.92
)
7.3
0
(7.3
1)
12
.00
(12
.01
)
7.0
4-7
.19
(d
, 1
0H
, A
r-H
);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.9
8 (
s,
1H
, N
H);
4.6
7 (
s, 1
H,
-CH
-
); 2
.90
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 2
.60
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.48
(t,
1H
,
-αC
H-)
; 2
.81
(d
, 2
H,
(CO
)CH
2
-);
6.0
0
(s,
2H
,
NH
2).
Vl
0.4
1
89
C
27H
35N
3O
3
72
.15
(72
.16
)
7.8
0
(7.8
1)
9.3
4
(9.3
5)
7.0
5-7
.22
(m
, 1
0H
, A
r-H
);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
4.6
5 (
s,
1H
, -C
H-)
; 2
.88
(t
, 4
H,
-
CH
2-)
; 2
.55
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
3.9
(t
, 1
H,
-αC
H-)
; 1
.73
(m,
2H
, -β
CH
2);
1
.48
(m
,
2H
, γC
H2);
3
.17
(t
, 2
H,
-
δC
H2);
Ch
ap
ter
2
79
Ta
ble
2.
2:
An
aly
tica
l a
nd
Sp
ect
rosc
op
ic D
ata
of
the
Syn
the
size
d C
om
po
un
ds
(An
alo
gu
es-
II)
En
try
Sid
e c
ha
in o
f a
min
o a
cid
s
(R)
Rf
va
lue
Yie
ld
(%)
Mo
lecu
lar
form
ula
Ele
me
nta
l a
na
lysi
s (%
)
Fo
un
d
(Ca
lcu
late
d)
1H
-NM
R (
CD
Cl 3
), δ
C
H
N
Xa
H
0
.44
9
4
C1
8H
27N
3O
3
64
.84
(64
.86
)
8.1
5
(8.1
6)
12
.61
(12
.62
)
7.2
-7.4
0 (
m,
5H
, A
r-H
); 1
.43
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.80
(s,
1H
, N
H-
Gly
); 3
.8 (
s, 2
H,
-ArC
H2-)
; 2
.80
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 2
.42
(t
, 4
H,
-
CH
2-)
; 3
.85
(s,
2H
, α
CH
2).
Xb
CH3
0
.39
9
1
C1
9H
29N
3O
3
65
.67
(65
.68
)
8.4
1
(8.4
2)
12
.08
(12
.09
)
7.1
-7.3
5 (
m,
5H
, A
r-H
); 1
.43
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.85
(s,
1H
, N
H-
Ala
);
3.8
5
(s,
2H
, -A
rCH
2-)
;
2.8
2
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 2
.40
(t
,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.40
(m
, 1
H,
αC
H);
1.1
5(d
, 3
H,
βC
H3).
Xc
CH3
CH3
0.4
1
95
C
21H
33N
3O
3
67
.20
(67
.21
)
8.7
8
(8.8
0)
11
.20
(11
.22
)
7.2
0-7
.35
(m
, 5
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.80
(s,
1H
, N
H-
va
l);
3.8
5
(s,
2H
, -A
rCH
2-)
;
2.8
4
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 2
.45
(t
,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.50
(d
, 1
H,
αC
H-
); 1
.70
(m
, 1
H,
βC
H-)
; 1
.20
(d,
6H
, γC
H3).
Ch
ap
ter
2
80
Xd
C H2
CH
CH3
CH3
0.4
6
90
C
22H
35N
3O
3
67
.85
(67
.86
)
9.0
5
(9.0
6)
10
.77
(10
.79
)
7.2
-7.4
0 (
m,
5H
, A
r-H
); 1
.43
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.90
(s,
1H
, N
H-
Leu
); 3
.80
(s,
2H
, -A
rCH
2-)
; 2
.8
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 2
.40
(t
, 4
H,
-
CH
2-)
; 4
.55
(t
, 1
H,
-αC
H-)
;
1.6
7 (
t, 2
H,
βC
H2-)
; 1
.45
(m
,
1H
, -γ
CH
-);
1.1
(d
, 6
H,
δC
H3).
Xe
H2C
0.5
2
89
C
25H
33N
3O
3
70
.90
(70
.92
)
7.7
9
(7.8
0)
9.9
2
(9.9
3)
7.1
-7.4
0 (
m,
10
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.80
(s,
1H
, N
H-
Ph
e);
3
.80
(s
, 2
H,
-ArC
H2-)
;
2.9
0 (
t, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 2
.4 (
t, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.75
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
3.3
(d,
2H
, β
CH
2-)
Xf
H2
CC H2
CO
OH2
C
0.3
5
91
C
28H
37N
3O
5
67
.87
(67
.89
)
7.5
1
(7.5
2)
8.4
8
(8.4
9)
7.2
-7.4
(m,
10
H,
Ar-
H);
1
.43
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.85
(s,
1H
, N
H-
Glu
);
3.8
8
(s,
2H
, -A
rCH
2-)
;
2.8
2(t
, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 2
.45
(t,
4H
,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.45
(s
, 1
H,
-αC
H-)
;
1.8
(m,
2H
, -
βC
H2-)
; 2
.0
(t,
2H
, -γ
CH
2-)
; 5
.20
(s,
2H
, C
H2-
Ph
).
Ch
ap
ter
2
81
Xg
N HO
O
0.3
9
90
C
30H
42N
4O
5
66
.88
(66
.89
)
7.8
5
(7.8
6)
10
.39
(10
.40
)
7.2
-7.4
0 (
m,
10
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.80
(s,
1H
, N
H-
Lys)
; 3
.80
(s,
2H
, -A
rCH
2-)
;
2.8
5(t
, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 2
.45
(t,
4H
,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.50
(t
, 1
H,
-αC
H-)
;
1.4
5 (
m,
2H
, β
CH
2-)
; 1
.35
(m
,
2H
, γC
H2-)
; 1
.45
(m
, 2
H,
δC
H2-)
; 2
.35
(t
, 2
H,
εC
H2-)
;
7.9
5 (
s, 1
H,
NH
); 4
.85
(d
, 2
H,
O-C
H2-A
r).
Xh
H2
CC H2
H2
CN H
N H
NO2
NH
0.3
5
90
C
22H
35N
7O
5
55
.35
(55
.36
)
7.3
7
(7.3
9)
20
.55
(20
.56
)
7.2
-7.3
5 (
m,
5H
, A
r-H
); 1
.43
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.85
(s,
1H
, N
H-
Arg
);
3.9
0
(s,
2H
, -A
rCH
2-)
;
2.8
2(t
, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 2
.45
(t,
4H
,
-CH
2-)
; 4
.55
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
1.3
0 (
q,
2H
, β
CH
2-)
; 1
.25
(m
,
2H
, γC
H2-)
; 2
.60
(t,
2H
, δ
CH
2-
); 8
.1 (
m,
1H
, N
H-g
ua
nid
ine
).
Xi
NN
H2C
H2
CO
H2
C
0.4
4
91
C
30H
39N
5O
4
67
.50
(67
.53
)
7.3
6
(7.3
7)
13
.10
(13
.11
)
7.2
-7.3
5(m
, 1
0H
, A
r-H
); 1
.45
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.90
(s,
1H
, N
H-
His
);
3.8
5
(s,
2H
, -A
rCH
2-)
;
2.8
5
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 2
.50
(t
,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.60
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-
); 3
.12
(d,
2H
, -β
CH
2-)
; 6
.50
(s,
2H
, im
ida
zole
);
4.5
5(s
, 2
H,
CH
2);
5.6
0 (
s, 2
H,
CH
2).
Ch
ap
ter
2
82
Xj
H2C
HN
0.5
0
94
C
27H
34N
4O
3
70
.11
(70
.12
)
7.3
6
(7.3
7)
12
.12
(12
.14
)
7.2
-7.3
0 (
m,
9H
, A
r-H
); 1
.45
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.80
(s,
1H
, N
H-
Trp
);
3.8
0
(s,
2H
, -A
rCH
2-)
;
2.8
8
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 2
.45
(t
,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.55
(s,
1H
, -α
CH
-
); 3
.20
(d
, 2
H,
βC
H2-)
; 1
0.1
0
(d,
1H
, N
H o
f in
do
le);
6.8
0 (
d,
1H
, -C
H-)
.
Xk
0.4
2
91
C
22H
35N
3O
3
67
.84
(67
.86
)
9.0
5
(9.0
6)
10
.79
(10
.80
)
7.2
-7.5
0 (
m,
5H
, A
r-H
); 1
.43
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.85
(s,
1H
, N
H-
Ile
);
3.8
2
(d,
2H
, -A
rCH
2-)
;
2.8
4 (
t, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 2
.40
(t
,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.50
(d
, 1
H,
-αC
H-
); 2
.60
(m
, 1
H,
-βC
H-)
; 2
.0 (
m,
2H
, -γ
CH
2 -
); 1
.0(t
, 6
H,
CH
3).
Xl
0.4
3
90
C
21H
31N
3O
3
67
.52
(67
.53
)
8.3
5
(8.3
7)
11
.23
(11
.24
)
7.1
0-7
.50
(m
, 5
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 3
.85
(s,
2H
, -
ArC
H2-)
; 2
.85
(t
, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
;
2.4
0
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 3
.90
(t
,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
1.8
0
(m,
2H
, -
βC
H2);
1
.47
(m
, 2
H,
γ-C
H2);
3.1
5 (
t, 2
H,
δ-C
H2).
Ch
ap
ter
2
83
Ta
ble
2.3
: A
na
lyti
cal
an
d S
pe
ctro
sco
pic
Da
ta o
f th
e S
yn
the
size
d C
om
po
un
ds
(An
ao
lgu
es-
III)
En
try
S
ide
ch
ain
of
am
ino
aci
ds
(R)
Rf
Va
lue
Mo
lecu
lar
form
ula
Yie
ld
(%)
Ele
me
nta
l a
na
lysi
s (%
)
Fo
un
d
(Ca
lcu
late
d)
1H
-NM
R (
CD
Cl 3
), δ
pp
m
C
H
N
XII
Ia
H
0.4
9
C1
9H
28N
2O
3
93
6
8.6
3
(68
.65
)
8.4
8
(8.4
9)
8.4
1
(8.4
3)
7.2
0-7
.40
(m
, 5
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
1(s
, 9
H,
Bo
c);
2.4
(d
, 2
H,
-ArC
H2-)
; 2
.65
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
1.7
0
(m,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
1.9
(m,1
H,-
CH
-
pip
eri
din
e);
7.8
5
(s,1
H,N
H-
Gly
); 3
.85
(s,
2H
, -C
H2)
XII
Ib
CH3
0
.45
C
20H
30N
2O
3
90
6
9.3
2
(69
.33
)
8.7
1
(8.7
3)
8.0
9
(8.0
9)
7.2
0-7
.40
(m
, 5
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3(s
, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.8
(s,
1H
,
NH
-Ala
); 2
.45
(d,
2H
,-A
rCH
2-
); 2
.65
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 1
.7 (
q,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 1
.91
(m,
1H
,-C
H-
pip
eri
din
e);
4
.5 (
q,
1H
, α
-
CH
-);1
.10
(d,
3H
, C
H3)
XII
Ic
CH3
CH3
0.4
7
C2
2H
34N
2O
3
85
7
0.5
4
(70
.55
)
9.1
3
(9.1
5)
7.4
6
(7.4
8)
7.1
0-7
.40
(m
, 5
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 8
.00
(s
,
1H
, N
H-V
al)
; 2
.45
(d
, 2
H,
-
ArC
H2-)
; 2
.65
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
1.7
0
(m,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 1
.90
(m,
1H
, -C
H-p
ipe
rid
ine
); 4
.5
(q,
1H
, α
-CH
-);
1.7
0 (
m,
1H
,
Ch
ap
ter
2
84
βC
H-)
; 1
.2 (
d,
6H
, γC
H3).
XII
Id
C H2
CH
CH3
CH3
0.4
5
C2
3H
38N
2O
3
92
7
1.0
9
(71
.10
)
9.3
3
(9.3
4)
7.2
0
(7.2
1)
7.1
5-7
.40
(m
, 5
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.85
(s
,
1H
, N
H-L
eu
); 2
.4 (d
, 2
H,
-
ArC
H2-)
; 2
.65
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
1.7
2 (
q,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;1.9
2 (
m,
1H
, -C
H-p
ipe
rid
ine
); 4
.45
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-);
1.7
0
(t,
2H
,
βC
H2-)
; 1
.45
(m
, 1
H,
-γC
H-)
;
1.2
(d,
6H
, δ
CH
3).
XII
Ie
H2C
0.5
4
C2
6H
34N
2O
3
90
7
3.9
0
(73
.91
)
8.1
0
(8.1
1)
6.6
2
(6.6
3)
7.1
-7.3
0
(m,
10
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.90
(s
,
1H
, N
H-P
he
); 2
.49
(d
, 2
H,
-
ArC
H2-)
; 2
.7 (
t, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
;
1.8
0 (
q,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 1
.90
(m
,
1H
, -C
H-p
ipe
rid
ine
); 4
.55
(t,
1H
, -α
CH
-);3
.1
(d,
2H
,
βC
H2-)
.
XII
If
H2
CC H2
CO
OH2
C
0.4
0
C2
9H
38N
2O
5
95
7
0.4
1
(70
.42
)
7.7
5
(7.7
6)
5.6
5
(5.6
6)
7.2
-7.4
0
(m,
10
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3 (
s, 9
H,
Bo
c);
8.0
(s,
1H
,
NH
-Glu
);
2.4
0
(d,
2H
, -
ArC
H2-)
; 2
.69
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
1.7
5(q
, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
; 1
.95
(m
,
1H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.35
(t,
1H
, -
αC
H-)
; 1
.7 (
m,
2H
, -
βC
H2-)
;
1.9
9 (
t, 2
H,
-γC
H2-)
; 5
.15
(s,
2H
, C
H2-P
h).
Ch
ap
ter
2
85
XII
Ig
N HO
O
0.5
1
C3
1H
43N
3O
5
90
6
9.2
3
(69
.25
)
8.0
5
(8.0
6)
7.8
2
(7.8
3)
7.2
5-7
.45
(m,
10
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
5(s
, 9
H,
Bo
c);
7.9
2(s
, 1
H,
NH
-Lys)
; 2
.42
(d
, 2
H,
-
ArC
H2-)
; 2
.60
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
1.9
1 (
m,
1H
, -C
H-)
; 1
.80
(q
,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
4.4
0
(t,
1H
, -
αC
H-)
; 1
.59
(m
, 2
H,
βC
H2-)
;
1.3
5
(m,
2H
, γC
H2-)
;1.4
5
(m,
2H
, δ
CH
2-)
; 2
.10
(t,
2H
,
εC
H2-)
; 4
.85
(s,
2H
, -O
-CH
2-
Ar)
; 8
.0 (
s, 1
H,
NH
).
XII
Ih
H2
CC H2
H2
CN H
N H
NO2
NH
0.4
0
C2
3H
36N
6O
5
92
5
7.9
8
(57
.99
)
7.6
0
(7.6
1)
17
.62
(17
.63
)
7.3
0-7
.45
(m
, 5
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
5
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.90
(s
,
1H
, N
H-A
rg);
2.4
5 (
d,
2H
, -
ArC
H2-)
; 2
.60
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
1.9
0 (
m,
1H
, -C
H-)
; 1
.7 (
q,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
4.5
0
(t,
1H
, -
αC
H-)
; 1
.30
(m,
2H
, β
CH
2-)
;
1.2
0 (
m,
2H
, γC
H2-)
; 2
.55
(t,
2H
, δ
CH
2-)
; 8
.05
(m
, 1
H,
gu
an
idin
e).
XII
Ii
NN
H2C
H2
CO
H2
C
0.4
3
C3
1H
40N
4O
4
89
6
9.8
9
(69
.90
)
7.5
5
(7.5
7)
10
.52
(10
.53
)
7.2
5-7
.45
(m,
10
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.90
(s
,
1H
, N
H-H
is);
2.4
9 (
d,
2H
, -
ArC
H2-)
; 2
.75
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
2.0
0 (
m,
1H
, -C
H-)
; 1
.77
(q
,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.58
(t
, 1
H,
-
αC
H-)
; 3
.15
(d
, 2
H,
-βC
H2-)
;
6.4
8
(s,
2H
, im
ida
zole
);
4.5
3
(s,
2H
, C
H2);
5
.55
(s
,
Ch
ap
ter
2
86
2H
, C
H2).
XII
Ij
H2C
HN
0.4
9
C2
8H
35N
3O
3
90
7
2.8
5
(72
.86
)
7.6
3
(7.6
4)
9.0
9
(9.1
0)
7.2
0-7
.45
(m
, 9
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.90
(s
,
1H
, N
H-T
rp);
2.4
5 (
d,
2H
, -
ArC
H2-)
; 2
.77
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
1.9
9 (
m,
1H
, -C
H-)
; 1
.80
(q
,
4H
, -C
H2);
4
.50
(t
, 1
H,
-
αC
H-)
; 3
.12
(d
, 2
H,
βC
H2-)
;
10
.00
(d
, 1
H,
NH
-in
do
le);
6.7
0(s
, 1
H,
-CH
-).
XII
Ik
0.4
1
C2
3H
36N
2O
3
90
7
1.0
9
(71
.10
)
9.3
3
(9.3
4)
7.1
9
(7.2
1)
7.2
0-7
.40
(m
, 5
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
3
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 7
.90
(s
,
1H
, N
H-I
le);
2
.50
(d,
2H
, -
CH
2-)
; 2
.72
(q
, 4
H,
-CH
2-)
;
1.9
5 (
m,
1H
, -C
H-)
; 1
.70
(q
,
4H
, -C
H2-)
; 4
.45
(d,
1H
, -
αC
H-)
; 2
.5(m
, 1
H,
βC
H-)
;
1.9
0 (
m,
2H
, γC
H2-)
; 1
.0 (
d,
6H
, δ
CH
3).
XII
Il
0.4
5
C2
2H
32N
2O
3
90
7
0.9
2
(70
.94
)
8.6
4
(8.6
6)
7.5
0
(7.5
2)
7.2
-7.5
(m
, 5
H,
Ar-
H);
1.4
5
(s,
9H
, B
oc)
; 2
.49
(d
, 2
H,
-
ArC
H2-)
; 2
.70
(t,
4H
, -C
H2-)
;
1.9
0 (
m,
1H
, -C
H-)
; 1
.75
(m
,
4H
,-C
H2-)
; 3
.85
(t,
1H
, -
αC
H-)
; 1
.67
(m
,2H
, -β
CH
2);
1.4
5 (
m,
2H
, γC
H2);
3.1
(t,
2H
, -δ
CH
2);
Chapter 2
87
2.3.4. Biological Studies
2.3.4.1 Antibacterial assay
The antibacterial assay was carried out against gram +ve and gram -ve bacteria by
following the procedure of Perez et al.,86
with slight modifications.
2.3.4.1a Bacterial cultures used:
The following pure cultures of bacteria were obtained from Department of
Pathology and Microbiology, JSS Medical College, Mysore, India.
• Klebesilla pneumoniae (gram –ve)
• Pseudomonas auregenosa (gram –ve)
• Escherichia coli (gram –ve)
• Staphyllococcus aureus (gram +ve)
2.3.4.1b. Media preparation:
Nutrient broth media was used for antibacterial screening and the composition is
as follows: Peptic digest of animal (5 g), sodium chloride (5 g), beef extract (1.5 g) and
yeast extract (1.5 g). The fresh media was prepared by dissolving 13.0 g in one litre
distilled water. The pH of the media at 25
0C was 7.4 ± 0.2 and it was sterilized at 121
0C
(15 lbs pressure) for 15 minutes.
2.3.4.1c. Preparation of inoculums:
One day prior to the testing, inoculation of the bacterial fresh cultures were
cultivated separately into 10 mL of sterile distilled water and kept at 37 0C overnight.
Chapter 2
88
2.3.4.1d. Quantification of bacterial colonies:
After cultivation, the bacteria were harvested and their density was determined
by measuring A600 and referring to previously determined standards. The final density of
bacteria was adjusted to 5 x 106 CFU/mL.
2.3.4.1e. Preparation of samples of synthesized compounds
All the Boc deblocked compounds and standard Strepomycin were dissolved in
presterilized distilled water to get the respective stock solution of concentration 200
μg/mL. For each antibacterial assay, 50 μL of the stock solution was added to the well
made at the centre of the petriplate (10 μg/well). The distilled water was taken as a
negative control where as Strepomycin was used as positive control.
2.3.4.1f. General method for antibacterial assay:
In vitro antibacterial assays were performed against Staphylococcus aureus,
Escherichia coli, Klebesiella pnemoniae and Pseudomonas auregenosa by using agar well
diffusion method.86
The bacterial strains were cultivated in Muller-Hinton broth and the
inocculum concentration was adjusted by the method of mid-logarithmic phase (OD
600=0.5). The molten media was prepared by adding Muller-Hinton agar in sterile distilled
water and autoclaved for 1 hr. The autoclaved molten media was poured into pre-
sterilized 90 mm petriplate and allowed to solidify. Then, the media was scooped out at
the center by using 8 mm sterilized cup-borer and inocculum were spread over the media
and 50 μL of stock solution of compounds (10 µg/well) was added to the well made in the
petriplate and kept for 3-4 days at 37 0C. All the synthesized compounds were tested in
triplicate, Streptomycin was used as positive control and water as negative control. The
zone of inhibition was measured in mm and presented in Table-2.4, 2.6, 2.8 and Figure-
2.3, 2.5, 2.7 respectively.
Chapter 2
89
2.3.4.2. Antifungal activity:
The antifungal activities of the synthesized compounds were evaluated by
following the procedure of Singh et al., 87
with slight modifications.
2.3.4.2a. Fungal cultures used:
The pure cultures of fungi were obtained from Department of Studies in
Microbiology, University of Mysore, Mysore, India. The fungal strains used were,
• Aspergillus niger
• Aspergillus flavus
• Fusarium monoliforme
2.3.4.2b. Media preparation:
Potato dextrose agar (PDA) media was used for the antifungal screening. The
molten media was prepared by dissolving 39 g of PDA in one litre distilled water. The pH
of the media was adjusted to 7.2 and sterilized at 121 0C (15 lbs pressure) for 15 minutes.
One day prior to the testing, inoculation of the fungi were made separately into 25
ml of sterile distilled water and kept at rt.
2.3.4.2c. Preparation of inoculums:
The fresh spores were harvested in sterilized normal saline (0.9 % NaCl in distilled
water containing a drop of Tween-80). Spore suspension was spread on PDA media (20
mL) in a sterile petriplate and incubated at 25 0C until sufficient sporulation occurs (3-6
days).
2.3.4.2d. Quantification of fungal spores:
Approximate quantity of fungal spores was taken in 20 mL of culture broth with
0.02 % Tween-80. Suspension was filtered through double-layered muslin cloth.
There are two types of squares in Haemocytometer viz., big squares and small
squares. The spore count was taken in big squares and spore load or inoculums size per
ml was calculated using the formula,
Chapter 2
90
Inoculum size/ ml = N x10, 000 or N x 104
Where, N = Mean number of chambers counted in one big square.
(Factor 10, 000, because, each big square has a volume of 1mm x 1mm x 0.1 mm or 1/10
cm x 1/ 10 cm x 1/ 100 cm = 1/ 10, 000 cm3 or 10
- 4 cm
3)
Thus, inoculums size for
A. niger = 6.8 x 104/ ml
A. flavus = 4.6 x 104/ ml
F. monoliforme = 5.2 x 104 / ml
2.3.4.2e. Preparation of samples of synthesized compounds
All the Boc deblocked compounds and standard Bavistin were dissolved in
presterilized distilled water to get the respective stock solution of concentration 10
μg/mL. For each antifungal assay, 0.4 mL of this stock solution was taken and spreaded
over the media of petriplate uniformely. The distilled water was taken as a negative
control and Bavistin is used as positive control.
2.3.4.2f. General method of antifungal assay:
In vitro antifungal assays were performed against Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus
flavus and Fusarium monoliforme by using agar well diffusion method. The fungal cultures
were raised by growing on PDA media of pH 7.4 for six days at 25 0C. The spores were
harvested in sterilized normal saline (0.9 % NaCl in distilled water) and its concentration
was adjusted to 1 x 106/ml with a Haemocytometer. The autoclaved molten media (20mL)
was poured in to each 90 mm sterilized petriplate and allowed to solidify. To study the
growth response of fungi species, 0.4 mL of the synthesized compounds (10 µg/mL) was
poured in to each plate and spreaded uniformly over the agar media. A volume of 10 µl
spore suspension was poured in to the small depression made at the center of the plate
and kept for 6 days at 25 0C. After six days of incubation, the plates were observed and
compared with their respective controls. The control plates contained only distilled water
for which fungal growth is taken as 100% growth (no inhibition). The fungicidal activity of
Chapter 2
91
the synthesized compounds (Analogues - I, II, III) was assessed by comparing the zone of
fungal growth in treated plates with that of control plates in mm and the results are
presented in (Table - 2.5, 2.7, 2.9 and Figure - 2.4, 2.6 and 2.8) respectively.
2.3.4.3. Evaluation of antioxidant activity by using DPPH
(1, 1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging method:
The DPPH radical scavenging effect was carried out according to the method
employed by Blois.88
Compounds of different concentrations (Analogues I, II, III) were
dissolved in DMF and prepared in distilled ethanol, 1mL of each compound solutions having
different concentrations (10 µM, 50 µM, 100 µM, 150 µM and 250 µM) were taken in
different test tubes, 4 mL of a 0.1 mM ethanol solution of DPPH was added and shaken
vigorously. A DPPH blank was prepared (without compound) using 1 mL of DMF along with 4
mL of ethanol for the baseline correction. The tubes were then incubated in dark room at rt
for 20 min. The change (decrease) in the absorbance at 517 nm was measured using a UV-
Visible Spectrophotometer. Percent decrease in the absorbance was recorded for each
concentration and calculated on the basis of the observed decrease in absorbance of the
radical. BHA and AA were used as reference standards. The radical scavenging activity was
expressed as the inhibition percentage and was calculated using the formula:
Radical scavenging activity (%) = [(A0 – A1) / A0 ×100]
Where A0 = Absorbance of the control (blank, without compound) and
A1 = Absorbance of the compound.
IC50 (concentration required for 50 % inhibition) value of the compound can be
calculated by plotting graph, taking concentration of compounds on X-axis and % of
radical scavenging activity on Y-axis. IC50 values of analogues-I, II and III are presented in
(Table-2.10 - 2.12) respectively.
Chapter 2
92
Tables and Figures
Table - 2.4: Antibacterial activity of Analogues – I:
Compoundsa
Inhibitory Zone (diameter) mmb
Staphylococcus
aureus
Escherichia
coli
Klebesiella
pneumoniae
Pseudomonas
auregenosa
IV 04 03 03 04
VIa 08 08 05 06
VIb 07 08 06 07
VIc 09 08 07 08
VId 09 08 09 10
Vie 13 13 12 11
VIf 10 09 09 08
VIg 07 07 06 07
VIh 07 06 05 06
Vii 10 09 07 09
VIj 12 12 11 14
VIk 05 04 05 06
VIl 07 06 07 08
Streptomycin 12 12 10 11
a Concentration of compounds and reference drug: 10 µg/well.
b Values are mean of three determinations, the ranges of which are less than 5% of the
mean in all cases.
Chapter 2
93
Table - 2.5: Antifungal activity of Analogues – I:
Compoundsa
Inhibitory Zone (diameter) mmb
Aspergillus
niger
Aspergillus
flavus
Fusarium
monoliforme
IV 02 04 05
VIa 05 04 05
VIb 06 05 04
VIc 02 07 05
VId 06 06 05
Vie 06 07 05
VIf 07 05 07
VIg 05 03 03
VIh 05 06 04
Vii 07 08 07
VIj 05 07 06
VIk 04 05 06
VIl 06 05 06
Bavistin 09 10 09
a Concentration of compounds and reference drug: 10 µg/mL
b Values are mean of three determinations, the ranges of which are less than 5% of the
mean in all cases.
Chapter 2
94
Table - 2.6: Antibacterial activity of Analogues – II:
Compoundsa
Inhibitory Zone (diameter) mmb
Staphylococcus
aureus
Escherichia
coli
Klebesiella
pneumoniae
Pseudomonas
auregenosa
IX 03 02 02 03
XIa 04 06 04 03
XIb 05 06 05 06
XIc 07 06 05 04
XId 08 07 06 08
XIe 09 11 09 11
XIf 04 07 04 05
XIg 06 08 05 06
XIh 04 06 06 07
XIi 08 09 08 11
XIj 10 09 12 12
XIk 07 05 05 06
XIl 08 09 07 06
Streptomycin 12 12 10 11
a Concentration of compounds and reference drug: 10 µg/well.
b Values are mean of three determinations, the ranges of which are less than 5% of the
mean in all cases.
Chapter 2
95
Table - 2.7: Antifungal activity of activity of Analogues – II:
Compoundsa
Inhibitory Zone (diameter) mmb
Aspergillus
niger
Aspergillus
flavus
Fusarium
monoliforme
IX 02 03 04
XIa 02 03 03
XIb 02 04 04
XIc 04 06 05
XId 07 06 06
XIe 10 09 08
XIf 07 09 09
XIg 06 07 08
XIh 05 03 05
XIi 05 06 04
XIj 09 10 08
XIk 02 03 04
XIl 05 04 06
Bavistin 09 10 09
a Concentration of compounds and reference drug: 10 µg/mL
b Values are mean of three determinations, the ranges of which are less than 5% of the
mean in all cases.
Chapter 2
96
Table - 2.8: Antibacterial activity of Analogues – III:
Compoundsa
Inhibitory Zone (diameter) mmb
Staphylococcus
aureus
Escherichia
coli
Klebesiella
pneumoniae
Pseudomonas
auregenosa
XII 01 02 02 02
XIVa 03 04 04 03
XIVb 04 04 03 03
XIVc 05 04 05 04
XIVd 06 05 06 05
XIVe 08 07 06 07
XIVf 04 06 06 04
XIVg 06 06 05 06
XIVh 04 06 05 05
XIVi 08 06 07 08
XIVj 08 08 07 07
XIVk 06 05 06 05
XIVl 06 05 05 06
Streptomycin 12 12 10 11
a Concentration of compounds and reference drug: 10 µg/well.
b Values are mean of three determinations, the ranges of which are less than 5% of the
mean in all cases.
Chapter 2
97
Table - 2.9: Antifungal activity of activity of Analogues – III:
Compoundsa
Inhibitory Zone (diameter) mmb
Aspergillus
niger
Aspergillus
flavus
Fusarium
monoliforme
XII 02 02 02
XIVa 02 02 03
XIVb 03 03 03
XIVc 04 04 03
XIVd 04 05 03
XIVe 04 06 05
XIVf 05 04 04
XIVg 04 04 05
XIVh 04 04 03
XIVi 05 05 06
XIVj 05 06 06
XIVk 05 05 04
XIVl 05 04 04
Bavistin 09 10 09
a Concentration of compounds and reference drug: 10 µg/mL
b Values are mean of three determinations, the ranges of which are less than 5% of the
mean in all cases.
Chapter 2
98
Table - 2.10: Antioxidant activity of Analogues – I:
Entry IC50 in µM
IV >250±0.11
VIa >250±0.11
VIb >250±0.13
VIc >250±0.15
VId >250±0.12
VIe >250±0.14
VIf >250±0.10
VIg >250±0.11
VIh >250±0.15
VIi >250±0.15
VIj 42.5±0.13
VIk >250±0.12
AA 15±0.10
BHA 15±0.12
Values represent mean ± SD (n=3).
IC50: Concentration required for 50% reduction of 0.1 mM DPPH radical.
Chapter 2
99
Table - 2.11: Antioxidant activity of Analogues –II:
Entry IC50 in µM
IX >250±0.10
XIa >250±0.15
XIb >250±0.15
XIc >250±0.10
XId >250±0.10
XIe >250±0.12
XIf >250±0.11
XIg >250±0.11
XIh >250±0.11
XIi >250±0.15
XIj 45±0.14
XIk >250±0.11
AA 15±0.12
BHA 15±0.11
Values represent mean ± SD (n=3).
IC50: Concentration required for 50% reduction of 0.1 mM DPPH radical.
Chapter 2
100
Table - 2.12: Antioxidant activity of Analogues –III:
Entry IC50 in µM
XII >250±0.10
XIVa >250±0.12
XIVb >250±0.12
XIVc >250±0.10
XIVd >250±0.11
XIVe >250±0.13
XIVf >250±0.12
XIVg >250±0.15
XIVh >250±0.12
XIVi >250±0.12
XIVj 49±0.14
XIVk >250±0.10
AA 15±0.11
BHA 15±0.14
Values represent mean ± SD (n=3).
IC50: Concentration required for 50% reduction of 0.1 mM DPPH radical.
Chapter 2
101
Figure 2.3: Antibacterial activity of Analogues-I
Figure 2.4: Antifungal activity of Analogues-I
Figure
Figure
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Zo
ne
of
Inh
ibit
ion
(m
m)
S.aureus
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Zo
ne
of
Inh
ibit
ion
(m
m)
A. niger
102
Figure 2.5: Antibacterial activity of Analogues-II
Figure 2.6: Antifungal activity of Analogues-II
Compounds
E. coli K. pneumoniae
Compounds
A. niger A. flavus F. monoliforme
Chapter 2
II
II
P. auregenosa
F. monoliforme
Figure
Figure
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Zo
ne
of
Inh
ibit
ion
(m
m)
S.aureus
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Zo
ne
of
Inh
ibit
ion
(m
m)
A. niger
103
Figure 2.7: Antibacterial activity of Analogues-III
Figure 2.8: Antifungal activity of Analogues-III
Compounds
E.coli K.pnemoniae
Compounds
A. niger A. flavus F. monoliforme
Chapter 2
III
III
P.auregenosa
F. monoliforme
Ch
ap
ter
2
10
4
Fig
ure
-2.9
. 1H
NM
R S
pe
ctra
of
Bo
c-A
la-B
HP
(V
b,
An
alo
gu
es-
I)
Ch
ap
ter
2
10
5
Fig
ure
-2.1
0.
1H
NM
R S
pe
ctra
of
Bo
c-Le
u-B
HP
(V
d,
An
alo
gu
es-
I)
Ch
ap
ter
2
10
6
Fig
ure
-2.1
1.
1H
NM
R S
pe
ctra
of
Bo
c-P
ro-B
ZP
(X
e,
An
alo
gu
es-
II)
Ch
ap
ter
2
10
7
Fig
ure
-2.1
2.
1H
NM
R S
pe
ctra
of
Bo
c-P
he
-BZ
P (
Xl,
An
alo
gu
es-
II)
Ch
ap
ter
2
10
8
Fig
ure
-2.1
3.
1H
NM
R S
pe
ctra
of
Bo
c-A
la-B
P (
XII
Ib,
An
alo
gu
es-
III)
Ch
ap
ter
2
10
9
Fig
ure
-2.1
4.
1H
NM
R S
pe
ctra
of
Bo
c-V
al-
BP
(X
IIIc
, A
na
log
ue
s-II
)
Chapter 2
110
2.4. Results and Discussion
We have synthesized a new class of amino acids conjugated benzhydrilpiperazine
(analogues-I, Va-Vl), benzylpiperazine (analogues-II, Xa-Xl) and 4-benzylpiperidine
(analogues-III, XIIIa-XIIIl) by coupling benzhydrilpiperazine, benzylpiperazine and
4-benzylpiperidine respectively with N-protected Boc-amino acids (a-l) using EDCI/HOBt
as coupling agent and NMM as a base. The product obtained was gummy and
characterized by TLC, elemental analysis and 1H NMR. The Boc deprotected synthesized
analogues were used for both antimicrobial and antioxidant activities.
Antibacterial activity:
Structural activity relationship of analogues-I, II and III
All the Boc deprotected analogues I, II and III were tested against strains of gram +ve
and gram -ve bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Klebesiella pneumoniae,
Pseudomonas auregenosa and Escherichia coli. Streptomycin was used as positive control
and water as a negative control. The concentration used for both test compounds and
that of standard remains the same. Among all the synthesized analogues, analogues-I
showed highest activity in comparison to the other two analogues. In analogues-I,
benzhydrilpiperazine conjugated phenylalanine VIe and tryptophan VIj showed equally
good antibacterial activity as that of conventional antimicrobial drugs, where as
benzhydrilpiperazine conjugated valine VIc, leucine VId and histidine VIi showed
moderate activity when compared to the standard drug. The observed enhancement in
antibacterial activity of the above said synthesized analogues may be due to the presence
of both the heterocyclic moiety and amino acid functionalities in the synthesized
compounds. The following factors may be held responsible for the enhancement of
antibacterial activity, viz., (i) the hydrophobicity of amino acid side chains (ii) the presence
of aromatic group in phenylalanine (iii) the presence of heterocyclic indole ring in
tryptophan and (iv) the presence of imidazole ring in the side chain of histidine. The
Chapter 2
111
presence of these helps the molecule to interact/penetrate more with cell membrane of
the microorganisms thereby inactivating them.
On the other hand the two phenyl rings of benzhydril group and the basicity of the
two nitrogen atoms may also influence the activity. The remaining compounds which are
aliphatic in nature showed slightly increasing activity from glycine (having only one
hydrogen atom), alanine (with one methyl group), valine (presence of two methyl groups)
to leucine (with more number of carbon atoms comparatively) analogues. Thus, it can be
summarized that as the number of alkyl groups increased the activity also increased. Even
though, benzhydrilpiperazine which taken in isolation was inactive or weakly active
towards these bacterial strains, upon conjugation with various amino acids, there is a
marked increase in the activity.
Where as the benzylpiperazine derivatives (analogues-II) showed less activity over
the benzhydrilpiperazine derivatives (analogues-I) which may be due the lack of one
phenyl ring in the benzylpiperazine moiety (analogues II). Since, there is one additional
phenyl ring in the benzhydril part, this may be held responsible for the difference in
activity between the two analogues. In analogues-II also phenylalanine XIe, histidine XIi
and tryptophan XIj conjugates showed highest activity but lower to conventional
antibiotics, and the remaining showed moderate activity.
4-Benzylpiperidine derivatives (analogues-III) showed less activity among the three
analogues, here the absence of one nitrogen atom in piperidine ring compared to the
piperazine ring may held responsible for the less activity. In analogues-III, phenylalanine
XIVe, histidine XIVi and tryptophan XIVj conjugates showed highest activity, but lower
than other two analogues-I, II and conventional antibiotics and the remaining showed
moderate activity.
Antifungal activity:
All the synthesized analogues were tested against fungal strains such as Aspergillus
niger, Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium monoliforme. Among all the synthesized analogues,
analogues-II, showed highest antifungal activity. Among the analogues-I, phenylalanine
Chapter 2
112
analogues VIe, histidine analogues VIi and tryptophan analogues VIj showed better
activity over the other compounds, but lower to conventional standard drug bavistin. The
other compounds in all the three analogues showed mild to moderate antifungal activity.
Here also the factors explained under antibacterial activity equally holds good.
Thus, the compounds containing Trp, Phe and His residues showed enhancement
towards both antibacterial and antifungal activities. This may be attributed due to the
presence of aromatic systems both in the amino acid residue as well as in the heterocyclic
system. The presence of aromaticity in both the moieties enhanced the antimicrobial
properties of the compounds synthesized. But this is not the case with other molecules
where in the amino acid residues lacks the aromatic ring system (with only aliphatic side
chains) and presence of aromaticity in heterocyles only reveals the activity towards good
to moderate properties. Hence, the molecules exhibiting enhanced property could be
regarded as lead molecules in the series.
Benzylpiperazine derivatives (analogues-II) showed less activity over the analogues-I.
In contrast, phenylalanine (XIe) and histidine (XIi) conjugated benzylpiperazine
derivatives showed marginal increased activity to their respective benzhydrilpiperazine
counterparts (VIe and VIi).
Where as the analogues-III (4-benzylpiperidine derivatives) showed less activity than
the other two analogues, here it could be due to the absence of the basic nitrogen atoms
as in the case of the piperazine ring, and here the piperidine ring lack one nitrogen atom
may influence the activity moderately. In analogues-III, phenylalanine XIVe, histidine XIVi
and tryptophan XIVj conjugates showed highest activity, but lower to other two
analogues - I, II and conventional antibiotics and the remaining compounds in the series
showed moderate activity.
Overall the results of antibacterial and antifungal activities showed the importance of
amino acids conjugation with the heterocycles.
Chapter 2
113
Antioxidant activity
All the synthesized analogues I, II, III were evaluated for antioxidant by using
DPPH radical scavenging method. In all the three analogues, analogues-I showed better
activity by a small margin, but analogues III showed less activity which may be due to lack
of one nitrogen in piperidine ring compared to piperazine motif. From the literature, it is
revealed that the compounds carrying the phenolic hydroxyl group (-OH) and the
aromatic secondary -NH have shown potent antioxidant activity. The lone pair of
electrons on the hydroxyl and -NH involved in electron transfer reaction with DPPH
radical. In agreement with this, in all the three analogues synthesized, tryptophan
conjugate showed potent activity. The observed activity may be due to the presence of
secondary -NH in indole ring of tryptophan but showed less activity compared to standard
drug AA and BHA. The remaining compounds in all the three analogues showed poor/no
activity ie., >250µM. Among tryptophan derivatives of three analogues (VIj, XIj and XIVj),
benzhydrilpiperazine analogues showed highest activity, followed by benzylpiperazine
and 4-benzylpiperidine analogues. Benzhydrilpiperazine, benzylpiperazine and 4-
benzylpiperidine taken in isolation showed no activity (>250 µM).
In all the three synthesized analogues, results show the importance of amino acids
substituents in DPPH free radical effect.
Chapter 2
114
2.5. Conclusion
In an effort to discover a new heterocyclic conjugated amino acid analogue as
novel bioactive molecule, we found that phenylalanine, tryptophan, histidine and proline
analogues showed good antimicrobial as well as antioxidant activities, among the other
tested amino acid conjugates. In comparison to the three amino acid conjugated
analogues, benzhydrilpiperazine conjugated amino acid analogues showed the highest
antimicrobial and antioxidant activities which may be due to the effect of two nitrogen
atoms of benzhydrilpiperazine moiety which is absent in other two analogues.
On the whole, all the amino acid conjugates of benzhydrilpiperazine,
benzylpiperazine and 4-benzylpiperidine have showed enhanced antibacterial, antifungal
and antioxidant activities when compared to the respective parent compounds. The
enhancement of biological activities might be due to the combined effect of both
heterocyclic skeleton and amino acid residues. The obtained results indicate that further
study on conjugation of these heterocycles with the peptides of varying chain
length/composition might be of interest for the identification of this new class of
antimicrobial and antioxidant agents.
Chapter 2
115
2.6. References
1. T. Tambem and V. Guillem, Folia pharmacol. Jpn., 1998, 112, 138-142.
2. Research report, Schering Corp, US-5432175.
3. Antoine and Michel, Laboratorie Roger Bellon, US-5053509.
4. A. Nakazato, Taisho Pharmaceutical Co, WO-0200259.
5. H. J. Shue, Schering Corp., WO-9808826,
6. Chambers, M. Stuart, Merck Sharp, & Dohme., US-5807857.
7. Research report, GlaxoSmithkline, WO-9322303.
8. W. E. Meyer, A. S. Tomcufcik, P. S. Chan, and M. Haug, J. Med. Chem., 1989, 32,
593-597.
9. E. Carceller, C. Almansa, M. Merlos and M. Giral, J. Med. Chem., 1992, 35, 4118-
4134.
10. E. Carceller, C. Almansa, M. Merlos and M. Giral, J. Med. Chem., 1993, 36, 2984-
2997.
11. T. R. Herrin, J. M. Pauvlik, E. V. Schuber and A. O. Geiszler, J. Med. Chem., 1975,
18(12), 1216.
12. M. Kimura, T. Masuda, K. Yamada, N. Kubota, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2002, 12,
1947-1950.
13. R. S. Upadhayaya, N. Sinha, S. Jain, N. Kishore, R. Chandra and S. K. Arora, Bioorg.
Med. Chem., 2004, 12, 2225-2238.
14. C. Kaiser, V. H. Audia, J. P. Carter and D. W. Macpherson, J. Med. Chem., 1993,
36, 610-616.
15. N. Kawasaki, H. Miyataka, M. Nishiki, H. Matsumato, N. Inagaki, H. Nagai and T.
Satoh, Chem. Pharma. Bull., 1999. 47(2), 177-181.
16. J. Shanklin, C. P. Jonson and A. G. Proakis, R. G. Barrett, J. Med. Chem., 1991, 34,
3011.
Chapter 2
116
17. N. Miyake, R. Fujita and M. Ishikawa, Jpn. J. Pharmacol., 2000, 82, 265-268.
18. C. Ito, W. B. Im, H. Takagi, M. Takahashi, K. Tsuzuki, S. Y. Liou and M. Kunihira, Eur.
J. Pharmacol., 1994, 203.
19. M. B. Emanuel and C. D. W. Towse, Drugs Today, 1980, 16, 219-237.
20. N. Sugiyama, F. Akahoshi, S. Kuwahara, M. Kajii, Y. Sakaue, H. Yakumaru, M.
Sugiura and C. Fukaya, J. Med. Chem., 1994, 37, 1977-1982.
21. M. Abou-Ghabria, J. A. Moyer, S. T. Nielsen, M. Webb and U. Patel, J. Med. Chem.,
1995, 38, 4026-4032.
22. J. Chern, K. Shia, T. Hsu, C. Tai, C. Lee, Y. Lee, C. Chang, S. Tseng and S. Shih.,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. lett., 2004, 14, 2519-2525.
23. Z. G. Hajos, US. Patent, 5,215,987, 1993.
24. Kaneko, US. Patent, 5,304,558, 1994.
25. Baltes, US. Patent, 4,525,358, 1985.
26. C. Labrid, G. L. Reignier and M. Laubie, Eur. J. Resp. Dis., 1983, 126, 185-189.
27. K. S. Song, S. H. Lee, H. J. Chun, J. Y. Kim, M. E, Jung, K. Ahn, S. Kim and J. Lee.,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2008, 16, 4035- 4051.
28. D. K. Yung, D. E. Mahony and L. W. Whitehouse, J. Pharm. Sci., 1971, 60(3), 386-
389.
29. J. B. Press, R. Falotico, Z. A. Hajos, R. A. Sawyers and R. M. Kanojia, J. Med. Chem.,
1992, 35(24), 4509-4515.
30. D. Bozsing, I. Simonek, G. Simig, I. Jakoczi, I. gacsalyi, G. levay and K. Tihanyi.,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2002, 12, 3097-3099.
31. H. Zhao, H. Thurkauf, K. Hodgetts, X. Zhang, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2002, 10,
3105.
32. H. Zhao, X. He, A. Thurkauf, D. Hoffman, A. Kieltyka and R. Brodbeck, Bioorg. Med.
Chem., 2002, 12, 3111-3115.
33. A. Foster, H. Wu, W. Chen, W. Williams, W. D. Bowen and R. R. Matsumoto,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2003, 13, 749-751.
Chapter 2
117
34. S. Younes, Y. Labssita, G. Baziard-Mouysset and M. Payard, Eur. J. Med. Chem.,
2000, 35, 107.
35. D. R. Bucle, C. J. M. Rockell, H. Smith and B. A. Spicer, J. Med. Chem., 1986, 29,
2262-2267.
36. H. Ohataka, Y. Fujimoto and T. Yoshid, Chem. pharma. Bull., 1987, 35(7), 2792-
2796.
37. H. Ohataka, K. Yoshida, K. Suzuki, K. Shimohara, S. Tazima, and K. Ito, Chem.
pharma. Bull. 1988, 36(12), 4825-4833.
38. A. I. Hernandez, J. Balzarini, F. Rodriguez-Barrios, A. San-Felix and M. J. Perez-
Perez, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2003, 13, 3027-3030.
39. Y. Dundar, B. Cakir, K. Erol, and M. I. Sahin, J. Fac. pharma. Gazi., 2003, 20, 21-30.
40. T. Asaki, Y. Sugiyama, T. Hamamoto, M. Higashioka, M. Umehara, H. Naito and T.
Niwa, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2006, 16, 1421-1425.
41. P. Chaudhary, S. Nimesh, V. Yadav, A. K. R. Verma and R. Kumar, Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2007, 42, 471-476.
42. H. Turkmen, M. Durgun, S. Yilmaztekin, M. Emul., A. Innocenti, D. Vullo, A.
Scozzafava, and C. T. Supuran, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2005, 15, 367-372.
43. S. Ozkirimli, T. I. Apak, M. Kiraz, and Y. Yegenoglu, Arch. Pharm. Res., 2005,
28(11), 1213-1218.
44. Y. E. Hages, Y. Labssita, G. B. Mouysset, M. Payard, D. H. Caignard and C. Rubat,
Ann. Pharm. Fr., 2000, 58(4), 254-259.
45. K. Hashimoto, H. Maeda and T. Goromaru, Brain Research, 1992, 590, 341-344.
46. J. Desai, V. N. S. Pendyala, S. F. Xavier, A. N. Misra and K. B. Nair, J. Appl. Polymer.
Sci., 2003, 91(2), 1097-1103.
47. Warner-Lambert, Co., US-6284774.
48. T. Klockgether, U. Wullner, J. P. Steinbach, V. Petersen, L. Turski and P.
Loschmann, Eur. J. pharmacol., 1996, 301, 67-73.
49. Altana Pharma Deutschland GmbH, DE-2825322.
Chapter 2
118
50. Merck & Co, US-5475109.
51. S. R. Fletcher, F. Burkamp, P. Blurton, S. K. F. Cheng and R. Clarkson, J. Med.
Chem., 2002, 45, 492-503.
52. Merck, Sharp, & Dohme, WO-0043362.
53. T. Hasegawa, Meiji Seika, WO-9807703.
54. L. Yang, G. Morriello, A. A. Patchett, J. Med. Chem., 1998, 41, 2439-2441.
55. Merck & Co., US-5494919.
56. L. Yang, G. Morriello and A. A. Patchett, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1999, 9, 1761-
1766.
57. A. Baxter, AstraZeneca AB, WO-0058305.
58. S. Hachiro, Eisai Co., US-5196439.
59. C. Ramalingan, S. Balasubramanian, S.Kabilan, and M. Vasudevan, Med. Chem.
Res., 2003, 12(1), 41-47.
60. C. Ramalingan, S. Balasubramanian, S. Kabilan, and M. Vasudevan, Med. Chem.
Res., 2003, 12(1), 26-32.
61. H. Sugimoto, H. Ogura, Y. Arai, Y. Iimura and Y. Yamanishi, Jpn. J. pharmacol.,
2002, 89, 7 -20.
62. C. A. Willoughby, S. C. Berk, K. G. Rosauer, S. Degrado, K. T. Chapman et al.,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2001, 11, 3137–3141.
63. D. A. Pissarnitski, T. Asberom, T. A. Bara, A. V. Buevich, J. W. Clader, W. J.
Greenlee, H. S. Guzik et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2007, 17, 57–62.
64. P. C. Ting, J. F. Lee, N. Shih, J. J. Piwinski, J. C. Anthes, R. W. Chapman, C. A. Rizzo, J.
A. Hey and A. A. Nomeir, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2002, 12, 2125–2128.
65. Y. Wang, S. Chackalamannil, Z. Hu, J. W. Clader, W. Greenlee, W. Billard, H. Binch,
G. Crosby et al, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2000, 10, 2247-2250.
66. C. Ramalingan, S. Balasubramanian, S. Kabilan and M.Vasudevan, Eur J. Med.
Chem., 2004, 39,527-533.
Chapter 2
119
67. C. S. Burgey, C. A. Stump, D. N. Nguyen, J. Z. Deng, A. G. Quigley, B. R. Norton, I. M.
Bell, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2006, 16, 5052–5056.
68. A. K. Dutta, L. L. Coffey, and M. E. A. Reith, J. Med. Chem., 1997, 40, 35-43.
69. H. Sugimoto, Y. Tsuchiya, H. Sugumi, K. Higurashi, N. Karibe and Y. Iimura, J. Med.
Chem., 1992, 35, 4542-4548.
70. D. L. Romero, R. A. Olmsted, T. J. Poel, R. A. Morge, C. Biles, B. J. Keiser, L. A.
Kopta and Jan M. Friis, J. Med. Chem., 1996, 39, 3769-3789.
71. J. M. Contreras, Y. M. Rival, S. Chayer, J. J.Bourguignon and C. G. Wermuth, J.
Med. Chem., 1999, 42, 730-741.
72. S. Imamura, Y. Ishihara, T. Hattori, O. Kurasawa, Y. Matsushita, Y. Suggira et al.,
Chem. pharm. Bull., 2004, 52(1), 63-73.
73. M. G. Mamolo, D. Z, Luciano Vio, M. Fermeglia, M. Ferrone, S. Pricl, G. Scialino
and E. Banfic, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2005, 13, 3797–3809.
74. J. A. McCauley, C. R. Theberge, J. J. Romano, S. B. Billings, K. D. Anderson et al., J.
Med. Chem., 2004, 47, 2089-2096.
75. Borza, S. Kolok, A. Gere, J. Nagy, L. Fodor and K. Galgoczy, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 2005, 16, 4638–4640.
76. Borza, E. Bozo, G. B. Szalai, C. Kiss and G. Takanyi, J. Med. Chem., 2007, 50, 901-
914.
77. J. L. Wright, Kesten. Sr, and R. B Upasani, PCT Int Appl. W02000000197- A1, 2000,
Chem. Abstr., 2000, 132, 64255.
78. G. Fischer, V. Mutel, G. Trube and P. Malherbe, J. PHaramacol. Exp. Ther., 1997,
283, 1285-1292.
79. P. C. Ting, J. F. Lee, J. Wu, S. P. Umland, R. Aslanian, J. Cao, Y. Dong, et al., Bioorg .
Med. Chem. Lett., 2005, 15, 1375–1378.
80. J. L. Wright, T. F. Gregory, S. R. Kesten, P. A. Boxer, K. A. Serpa and T. Leonard, J.
Med. Chem., 2000, 43, 3408-3419.
Chapter 2
120
81. D. Shaw, G. G. Chicchi, J. M. Elliott, M. Kurtz, D. Morrison et al., Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett., 2001, 11(23), 3031-3034.
82. D. A. Wacker, J. B. Santella, D. S. Gardner, J. G. Varnes, M. Estrella et al., Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett., 2002, 12, 1785–1789.
83. A. F. Novak, J. M. Solar, R. R. Mod, F.C. Magne, and E. L. Skau, Applied Microbiolgy,
1969, 1050-1056.
84. Zia-ur-Rehman, N. Muhammada, S. Shuja, S. Ali, I. S. Butler, A. Meetsma, M. Khan,
Polyhedron, 2009, 28, 3439-3448.
85. M.P. and B.P. of the compounds are compared with those provided in Lancaster
catalogue of research chemicals, U K Limited.
86. C. Perez, M. Paul, P. Bazerque, Acta Biol Med Exp., 1990, 15, 113-115.
87. I. Singh, and V. Singh, phytomorphology, 2000, 50(2), 151-157.
88. M. S. Blois, Nature, 1958, 26, 1199-1200.