Chapter - IV

TABLE 4.1 Houseless Popalation in Andhra Praderh

Source: Directorate of Census Operations, 'Andhra Pradesh.

13.

14,

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

ANDHRA PRADESH

The table 4.1 vividly shows that the nval houseless population varies from

1261 in Vijayanagm to 1 1,119 in Karimnagar and the total houseless population in

the state is 97,101. The urban houselesa population varies, h m 270 in Vijayanapam

97,101 1 66,837 1 1,63,938 ]

Kurnool

Mahbubnagar

Rang8 Reddy

Hyderabad

Nizamabad

Adilabad

Karimnagar

Warangal

~ ~ a m m a m

Nalgonda

4,303

7,647

4,997

0

3,885

5,684

4,855

11,119

8,296

4,003

4,522

1,472

1,276

13,619

14,441

662

1,138

1,598

3,543

2,618

791

1,608

5,775

8,923

18,616

14,441

4,547

6,822

6,453

14,662

10,914

4,794

6,130

to 14,441 in Hyderabad followed by Rangareddy district with 13,619. The total

houseless population in Andhra Pradesh is 1,63,938 with highest at 18,616 in

Rangareddy dishict and lowest at 1,531 in ~ija- district.

43 PERFORMANCE OF HOUSING SCHEMES

The performance of housing schemes has been evaluated basing on various

housing schemes eligibility, selection procedure, sanctions, achievement of various

schemes. The eligibility of a beneficiary to get a house can be seen in the table 4.2.

Table 43

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

Source: Corporation Limited, Hyderabad. 2005.

VAMBAY

IAY

CCSS (Gruhini)

Minority Housing, (Dukan-0- Makan) Beedi Workers Housing Fishermen Housing Weavers Housing Note on Weaker

Rs.20,000/- per mum BPL families in Urban Slums

BPL families and Freed bonded labour. Priority for victims of Natural Calamities and Atrocities Women Self Help Groups. Income Limit is Rs.32,000/- per mum. Preference for BPL families BPL families belonging to Minorities

BPL Beedi Workers families having PF account with one year experience

BPL families practicing Fiehing activity

BPL families practicing Weaving activity

Sections Housing programme. A.P. State Housing

50%

60%

60%

35%

40%

40%

--- -

10% 5%

(PHCs)

43.1 Hauling SeBe- and unit coct of houses

In Andbra Mesh the unit cast of house various brn scheme to scheme and

place to place. The datsils of Maus housing schmk and nspective unit cost of

houscs have beem pmmted in the table 4.3.

Table 43 Variour Housing Schemes md Unit Cost of Houses in Andhra Pradesh

I I I I I I I

Source: Note on Weaker Section8 Housing Programme. A.P. State Housing Corporation Limited, ~~derabad.hO<

-

The table 4.3 explicitly show that the unit cost of house varies from Rs.7,500

for SPR to Rs.60,000 fix megacities under VAMBAY housing scheme. It is also high

at Rs.50,000 for Namak Mazdoor Awaas Yojana scheme and megacities under

VAMBAY housing Rs.45,OOO for special scheme for weavers housing (Central),

Rs.40,OOO for Indiramma urban housing, municipalities under VAMBAY etc.

The State Government subsidy for housing is minimum at Rs.3000 for

Indiramma urban and urban permanent housing and maximum at Rs.13,200 for

Indiramma rural followed by special housing for fisherman at Rs.10,000. It is

interesting to note that the subsidy is Rs.7,000 for SPR, RPH, Special Housing and

Indiramma Rural Housing Schemes.

The Government of India subsidy varies h m Rs.9,375 for CCSS (Gruhini) to

Rs.45,000 for Namak Mazdoor Awaas Yojana followed by Rs.40,000 for special

housing for weavers (central).

The total subsidy for housing schemes varies from Rs.3000 for Indiramma

(urban) to Rs.45,000 for Namak Mazdoor Awaas Yojana.

The loan for various housing schemes ranges from Rs.8,000 for special

housing for weavers housing (Central) to Rs.35,000 for UPH and Indiramma urban

followed by Rs.30,000 for special housing (state).

The beneficiary contribution varies between Rs.500 for majority of housing

schemes to Rs.6,000 for megacities under VAMBAY hosing scheme.

433 Selection procedure

The houses are sanctioned by prescribed selection procedure and the

procedure various from scheme to scheme and authorities to authorities and

sanctioning authorities. The details of selection procedures are presented in the

table 4.4.

Selection Procedure of Different Housing Schemes in AP Name of the

Scheme SPR & RPH MLA Quota Distri"n

Quota State Reserve Quota

EWS Rlrbm)

IAY Housing

Special Housing Beedi Workers Fishmen Weavcrs

Selection Authorftiea

MLA -50% District h-&rgc Minister - 50% Allocation by Chief Minister

E m p o w d Committee Constituted by Government

Grama Sabha

Sanctioning Authorities

District Collector District Collector

Distrin Collector

District Collector

District Collector

Asst. Commissioner of Labour Asst. Director of Fisheries Asst. Director H&T

GO1 VAMBAY I I

SPR & RPH

In SPR (Semi Permanent Rural Housing) & RPH (Rural Permanent Housing)

scheme, 50 per cent are selected under the MLA quota and district in-Charge Minister

and sanctioned by district collector. The remaining 50 per cent houses are allotted by

Chief Minister and sanctioned by district collector.

GO1 Commissioner of F i s h ~ e s Commissioner of Handlooms & Textiles

Municipal Authorities

Minority Housing

EWS (Eeonomlcally Weaker Section)

District Collector CCSS (Gruhini)

In case of EWS (Urban), houses are selected by empowarad committea

constituted by the Government and the District Collector sanctions the selected

houses.

PD, DRDA

Source: Note on Weaker Sections Housing Programme. A .P. State Housing Corporation Limited, Hyderabad. 2005.

Selection Committee appointed by District Collector

IAY Housing Scheme

District Collector

In this scheme houses are selected by Gramasabha and the selected houses are

sanctioned by District Collector. Special housing for Beedi workers will be selected

by Adstant Commissioner of Labour, for Fisherman Houses are by Assistant

Dinctor of Fishers and s a c r i d by GO1 Cammissionex of Fishers, for weaver

h o w by &Assistaut Director of H & T and sanctioaad by commhioner of H & T.

VAMBAY (Valmlld Ambedksr AWMS Yojana)

In VAMBAY scheme, houses are selected by municipal authorities and GO1

sanctions the selected houses.

CCSS (GRIHINI) (Credit-Cum Suhidy Scheme)

Houses are allotted to member under Gruhini scheme by PD, DRDA and

sanctioned by District Collector,

MINORITY HOUSING

Under this scheme, members are selected by selection committee appointed by

District Collector and sanctioned by him.

43.3 Achievement of Rural Urban Housing Programmes in Andhrn Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh State has started accepting housing as a basic need, which

should be encouraged and supported by Government. Since 1957, immediately after

formation of Andhra Pradesh State, the State has started acquiring land and

distribution of house sites for weaker sections of the society. And about 24 lakh of

house sites are distributed so far, which is a continuous process. In response to the

Central Government's responsibility of providing shelter to low income groups, the

Andhra Pradesh Housing Board was established in1960, which is active in urban

centers and providing houses, in addition to this agency, the Development Authorities

also taking up housing projects with external financial help. In 1971, Andhra Pradesh

State Co-operative Housing Building Societies Federation Limited was established

with an objective. to provide houses to rural poor, SC and STs in particular. The

organization has implemented housing schemes on the house sites already allotted.

The Government of A.P. has mobilized resources about Rs. 10.00 crores through Life

Insurance Corporation and constructed 4,57,651 h o w in the rural areas of the State.

In the same year, another organimtion by name "Andhra Pradesh State Police

Housing Corporation" with an aim to provide houses to police personnel. Generally

kP.S.P.H,C constructs houses to police constables who were covered under LIC

category. This ~hisgmidon comtmd about 21,926 bows.

97

Duriqg 1971 4 1, undg Sited and Service programme, basic infrastructure like

water supply, intemal roads, approach etc., were provided along with construction

assistance of Rs.400 per unit for eaection of a shelter and 3,64,338 such shelters were

provided till 1981. In 1981, the financial assistance for shelter was raised to b.lOOO

and 6,12,880 such sheltem have come up within 2 years (1981-83). In 1983, the

Oovemment of A.P. has taken a decision to provide only permanent houses to rural

and urban poor, with the involvement of beneficiaries in execution of schemes which

brought drastic changes in thinking about housing and due to this very reason the A.P.

State reached peak heights in providing houses to poor in the country. The success of

social housing programmes through A.P. State Housing Corporation, which started its

modest beginning in 1979, provided permanent housing in the cyclone prone districts

of Andhra Pradesh. Later in 1981, the implementation of Weaker Section Housing

programme entrusted to this organization and so far this organization is able to

provide 43,22,266 houses with an amount of Rs.3021.31 crores to both urban and

rural areas which is very impressive achievement in physical terms.

To have a planned development and to reduce the squatting on public land in

urban centers, the Government of Andhra Pradesh has established another

organization, Andhra Pradesh Urban Development and Housing Corporation

(A.P.U.D. & H.C.) to look in to housing need of urban poor. Recently, this

organization has come up with very good proposal, which integrates urban

development programmes with housing.

However, the A.P.U.D. & H.C. has been merged with A.P.S.H,C.L. to have

single window system. Thus, the Government of A.P. is working towards fulfilling

the housing need to poorer sections of the society. As a result of the combined efforts

of the housing schemes, which were implemented in the State have resulted in

meeting the housing requirement, a basic need intensely wanted by people. The

progress recorded in this aspect is quite impressive. So, the A.P. Government

approached with a commitment to meet the people's basic need to housing.

Over a period of 23 yaars, h 1983-84 to 2004-05, the State patronaged to

construct as m a y as 52,64,760 houses for the needy people, most of whom

d t u t e s the weaker seetiom in the nnal areas. The housing schemes were rural

oriented programmes in A.P., as it was evidenced that 91.46 per cent of houses were

cmstmcted in mid areas. While it is only 8.54 per cent of the total number of houses

was constructed in the urban ltreas during the period of 1983-84 to 2007-08,

Houses have been sanctioned to respondents of both rural and urban and the

sanctioned houses were completed. The details of year-wise achievement of rural and

urban housing programmes in Andhra Pradesh during 1983 -2004 to 2007-2009 have

been presented in the table 4.5.

Table 4.5 Achievement of Rarrl and Urban Houmlng Prognmrnes of Andbra h d e s h

Source: A.P. State Housing Corporation Limited, Hyderabad.

The total number of houses, which ware cmatn~otcd prior to 1983-84, both for

the rural and utban, was 51,565. This figure shot up to 1, 38,227 during the year

1988-89. It may be notiad in the Table 4.4 that the State Governments performance

for two years, 1989-90 and 1990-91 was unimpressive as these two years accounted

for relatively less number of h m were comcted. The reason perhaps for this was

the transition period of introduction of the new economic policy.

From 1990-91, the momentum of house construction picked up rather fast and

cdntinued up to 1998-99, that year accounted for the completion of construction of

3,74,563 houses. Thereafter the total m b e r of houses construction rose up in 2001-

02. While, it started rising during the year 2003-04, to the tune of 3,75,425.

The Housing scheme in A.P. is a continuous programme. The State

Government has been according utmost priority to provide shelter to dl those who do

not have shelter over their heads. The total number of houses constructed up to 2007-

08, both in rural urban areas was 11,35,683,

The growth rate of achievement of rural housing programme during 1983-84

to 2008-09 is 8.78 and urban housing programme was 9.08. The overall growth rate of

achievement was 8.80. It is concluded that growth rate is fractionally higher in urban

and lower in rural programmes. Fig.4.1 Bar Diagram showing achievement of Rural

and Urban Housing Programmes of Andhra Pradesh,

4 3 . 4 ~ d ~ a f m 1 r a ~ 1 d r a m e

The particulars of nmk of houw sanctioned, eampletcd, estimated cost and axpenditure w i n naal bowing under RPH an presented in the table 4.6.

Tnbh 4.6 Statewnt Shonhtg You Wbe Smclbns & Complatloar ha R d Emhg uuder

RPH (Rad PHMnunt Hourlng)

19 20 21 22 23 24

2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004.2005 2005-2006

191742 95624 143661 255220 303161 314717

TOM CnadTbtrl

CompollPdGtorrtbrdc Source: A.P. State H o w i q Capordon Limited, Hydaabad,

914024 247029S

5.422

1304125 3743759 5.210

60418 66632 66356 172346 272370 275902

91288.75 197813.935

9.633

639B1.68 133448.2931

9,6%

1342 1.94 6693.68 10056.27 17865,4 21221.27 22030.19

4229.26 4664.24 4644.92 12064.22 19065.9 19313.14

The table 4.6 quite obviously show thrd dming 1983-1990, 7,61,728 how

were sanctioned with an eetimated cost of Rs.20,963.87 lakhe and 5,%,328 houses

were completed with an expadim of Rs. 19,749.8 lakhs. During the period 1985-86,

highest number of houses (1,20216) bousas was d o n c d and lowest (71866)

number of h o w sanctioned in 1989-1990. Highest numk of housw (1,01,732)

houses were completed in 1987-88 and lowest (38,673) houses wore completed in

1983-84.

During 1990-2000, under RPH 16,71,906 housa wna sanctioned with an

atihated cost of Ra85.560.88 lakhe nd 9,59,916 houses were mple tcd with an

expenditure of Rs.49,716.78 lakhs. The highest n u m k of houses (2,58,989) was

sanctioned in 1999-2000 and highest nmbcr of houses (2,02,276) was completed in

1998-1999. The table shows no uniformity either in sanctioned or completed houscs.

During 2000-2006, the RPH scheme sanctioned 13,04,125 houses with am

estimated cost of Rs.91,288.75 lakhs and completed 9,14,024 houses with an

expenditure of R~63~981.68 lakhs. The table shows that t h m is a steady increase in

bath the number of houses sanctioned and completed.

By and large, the RPH scheme sanctioned 37,43,759 houses dwing 1983-2006

with an estimated cost of Rs.1,97,813.5 l a b s and completed 24,70,298 houses with

an expenditure of Rs.1,33,448.29 lakhs.

The table also shows that there is 5.21 per ccnt growth rate in sanctioned

houses, 5.42 per cent growth in completed houses, and 9.63 per ccnt in estimated cost

end 9.65 per cent in expenditure. Fig.4.2 Bar Diagram showing year wise completion

and expenditure in rural housing under RPH.

~ t u n ~ i n d h a p s i a s & S P R a n ~ h h t s b l e 4 . 7 .

Tabb 47 Statewnt Sbowhg Yew Wiac Srnctlonr & Compbtim la Rural AbPtlag undw

SPR (Sad Pmamlcnt Rnnl Hourlag)

19 20 21 22 23 24

2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 20062005 2005-2006

TOM G m d Tdrl Compound Growth rate

63915 31875 47887 85074 I01054 104906

Soam A.P. State Housing Corporation Limital, Hydmbsd.

43~711 1218131

5313

20140 2221 1 22119 57449 90790 91958

304677 $23445

SA22

4474.05 223 1.25 3352.09 5955.1 8 7073.78 7343.42

1409.8 1554.77 a 1548.33 ,

402 1.43 6355.3 . 6437,76

30429.77 68268.806

8.903

2132739 4W3.927

9.342

The table 4.7 abows that dmiDg 1983-1990,2,24,733 hausss wae sanctioned

with an estimated coat of Rs.8,713.56 l a b and 1,98,780 how wwo oomplstad with

an axpanditure of Rs, 6,968.66 lakhs. H i number of how at 40,073 how(w was

sanctioned in 1985-86 and loweat at 23,935 houses in 1989-1990. Like wise, highest

number of h o w at 33,911 houses was completed in 1987-88 and lowcst at 12,892

houses were completed in 1983-84.

During 1990-2000, the SPR scheme sanctionad 539,307 houses with an

estimated cost of Rs.29,125.47 l a b and campletd 3,19,988 houses with an

expenditure of Rs.17,357.88 lakhs. The highest numba of houses at 92,949 was

sanctioned in 1996-1997 and highcai numba of houses at 67,426 was completed in

1998- 1999.

During 2000-2006, the SPR schcme sanctioned 4,34,711 haws with an

estimated cost of Rs.30,429.77 lakhs and completed 3,04,677 house! with an

expendim of Rs.21,327.39 lakhs. The table shows gradually and steadily incnased

rate in the houses completed.

On the whole, the SPR scheme sanctioned 12,18,751 houses during 1983-2006

with an estimated cost of Rs.68,268.81 lakhs and completed 8,23,445 houses with an

expenditure of R11.45~653.93 lakhs.

The table also shows that thm is 5.21 per cent growth rate in sanctioned

houses, 5.42 per cent growth in completed houses, and 8.90 per cent in estimated cost

and 9.34 per cent in expenditure. Fig.4.3 Bar Diagram showing year wise completed

and expenditure in ntral housing under SPR.

Fib43 :ar Di- ShD- Y c r W i u (btnpkld m d Expmdilwe in R d M m @ l g S P R .

~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ b c r o f h o v s G g s r a c t i o a a d , c o m p I e t s d ~ r a t d o o s t a n d cqmditurc towards in rural houshg \mder IAY an prcgaatcd in the table 4.8.

The We 4.8 obviously shows tirat during 1985-1990, 1,07,651 houses were

sanctiod with an t&m&d cm of Ra9.217.73 lakha and 91,823 housw, wcm

completed with an ucpadianr: of Rs.8,933.47 lrkha Ddng the paid 1987 to 89

highest number of houses at 55,016 houses was sanctioned in 1988-89 and lowest at

6,129 houses in 1987-1988. Hi@ number of houses at 44,208 houses was

completed in 1988-89 and loweart at 5,740 housas wac oompleted in 1987-88.

During 1990-2000, bra IAY sohama sanctioned $76,017 houses w i l an

estimated cost of Rs.58,903.99 lakits and oompleted 4,80,327 hwses with an

expenditure of Rs.78,855.41 lakhs. The hi* n w b a of houses at 91,934 wns

sanctioned in 1997-1998 and highest number of houses at 90,096 was complated in

1999-2000. No uniformity is fund either in the sanctioned or completed houses,

During 20062006, the IAY scheme sanctioned 8,31,344 houses with an

estimated cost of Rs.1,80,496.4 and completed 5,92,890 houses with an expenditure

of Rs.1,31,060.65 lakhs. The table shows that t h a t is an increase in both the number

of houses sanctioned and completed.

In total, the IAY scheme sanctioned 15,15,012 housaa during 1985-2006 with

an estimated cost of Rs.2,48,618.17 lakhs and completed 1 1,65,040 houses with an

expenditure of Rs.2,18,849.53 lakhs.

The table also shows that t h i s 10.67 per cant growth mta in sanctioned

houses, 10.56 per cent growth in completed how, and 14.49 per cent is estimated

cost and 13.8 per cent in expenditure. Fig.4.4 Bar Diagram showing year wise

completion and expenditure in Rural Housing under IAY.

TbepaticularsofnrmbarofhousaMadionsd,aanpletad,~ttdcostarsd

expenditure tow& in d housing d a Baedi Workas Housing am pmwated in

the table 4.9.

T8Me 4.9 Statement Sbowhg Year Wbe SIllrdlom & Complttion~ In Runl Hoaslng under

Sonrct: AP State Housing Corpotation Limited, Hyderabad.

During 1 991 -2000,1,11,258 bouses w*a sanctioned with nn estimated mt of

Rs.19,524.25 laldss and all the houws (loo"/,) wwae con#wtd. The highna number

of houses sanctioned and construded was in 1996.97.

Dudq 2000-06, 325471 housca ware adoned with an &mated cost of

Rs.11,628.95 lrlchs ad 27,325 hotma wsrs d with an cxpcdturt of

R~.9,82525 25, The him m p m k of houses satdonad and cMlstructad is in 2005-2006.

During 1991-2006, 1,43,729 houses wat sanctioned with an estimated cost

Rs.31,153.2 lakhs and 129093 h o w were cansEructad with an expenditure of

Rs.27,418.1 lakhs.

The growth is positive at 5.41 indicating i n m i n g mnd in the sanctioning of

houses. But growth rate is negative at -6.63 indicating declaiming trend in the

wnstruction of houses against tho sanctioned houses. Tbe growth rate of estimated

cost and expendim an positive at 5.53 and 4.79 indicating incnase in estimated mt

and expenditure. Fig.4.5 Bar Diagram showing year wise completion and Expenditure

in Rural Housing under Bsadi Workers Housing.

4 3 1 Sanctlou~ and cornpledon of Wcrvcn Hoarlng rcheme

The particulars of number of houses sanctioned, completed, estimated cost and

expenditure towards in rural housing under Wcavm Housing am presented in the

table 4.10.

Year

1983-84

Expcndftun (RS, a LW) .

537

Sradoned

8950

Constructed

8950

E8tbtadCott

537

Duriqg 1983-94 35646 bauscs watt sawid with m osth!ed cost of

Rs.2282.4975 lalrbs aad 35426 hum wan conmctd with an expenditure of

R9.2268.48 lekha. The largest mnnbar of amtructcd houses is obswd of 15,790 in

1986-87.

Duriug 1990-2000,1,65,983 bows wese smdomd with an athated cost of

Rs.22,009.3725 lakbs and 1,51337 h o w wan construdad with an expenditure of

Rs.20,302.49 la&. In 1990-91, 1991-92, 199697 and 1997.98 higher number of

holrse~ wen mctioned and cons!n~ctcd.

Duxing 2000-06, 32349 how wen sanctioned with an estimated cost of

Rs.2,142.905 lakhs and 28,915 h o w wen comtmctal with an expenditure of

Rs.1,914.55 lakhs. Highest number houses w m sanctioned and constructed in 2005-

06.

The total number of houses sanctioned is 2,33,878 with an estimated cost of

R9.26,434.775 and 2,15,878 houses wan ocvnstnrcted with an expenditure of

Rs.24,485.52 lakhs.

The growth rate in the sanctioning of houses is mere 0.09 and shows minute

growth, The growth in the conshucted houses shows negatively at 4.13 and indicates

declining trend in the construction of houses. The growth rate of estimated cost and

expenditure of houses an 1.58 and 1.46 shows minute p w t h . Fig.4.6 Bar Diagrnm

showing year wise completion and expenditure in rural housing under Weavers

Housing.

The particulars of number of hum sanctioned, canpi& astimdsd cost and

eqcdhlre towards in d housing unda W e a m Housing arc pmntcd in the

table 4.1 1.

Tibk 4.11 Statement Showing Year Wise Smctloui Q CompkClonr la RPnl 1- under

F b h m

During 1990-2000,84,658 houses were aandioned with an gtimalsd coot of

Rs.8,023.01 lakhs and 71859 housca w a e oo& with an ~xpd tu re of

Rs.6,719.975. Higheat nlmrba of houses mcrioncd and comWWJ is at 32,500 and

29,500 in 1996-1997 and at 25,000 and 18,430 in 1998-99.

Ytar

1990-91

2005-06

TOM

Crmd Total

Compound Growth Rite

S a n ~ e d

1540

Source: AP State Housing Copation Limited, Hydaabed.

20000

56622

141280

5.41

Cmrb9ctsd

1540

12020

34213

106069

5.22

E#thtU! Cwt

166.32

4700

121168,4825

1Eqrepdltpre m,inw)

166.32

2824.1

7718,0675

20891A925

639

14468.0425

7.30

During 2000.06, S6,622 hoaws wae sanctianed with am estimated cost of

R9.12,868,4825 lakh and 34,213 housed ware Coassbuckd witll an expanditwe of

Rs.7,748.0675 lalths. The highest mrmbar of hoPsas swctionecl and amsbuctbd is at

25,880 and 13395 in 2003-04 and at 20,000 and 12,020 in 2 0 0 M .

During 1990-2006,1,41,280 howme was sanctioned with m athated cost of

Rs.20,891.4925 and 1,06,069 houses wsra ooastmtd with an expenditure of

Rs.14,468.0425 lalrhs.

The growth rate of h o w sanctioned and constructad am 5.41 and 5.22

showing avcmge growth rate of 5 pa cent. The growth rate of estimahd cost and

expenditure are 6.39 and 7.30 showing average growth. Fig.4.7 Bar Diagnun showing

year wise completion and Expenditure in Rural Housing undn Fisherman.

The particulars of number of houses snnctional, completed, estimated wst and

expenditure towards in mJ housing under lndimmmn Housing Programme ~tlc

presented in the table 4.12.

ladiramma Hous ln~ Scheme In Different Phases

Undcr phase-I, 20,30,705 houses were sanctioned with UI cstimnted cost

2

3

Rs.6,95,516.47 lakhs and 14,97,789 were complctcd with an expcnditwc of

No 1

Rs.5,12,992.73 lakhs. Under phase-11, 19,X1.819 houses wcn: sanctioned with nn

Complctcd

1497789

Source: www.housing.gov.ap.in

2007-08

2008-10

Total

estimated cost of Rs.6,78,773.00 lakhs and 11,39,460 hous~s wm completed with an

expenditure of Rs.3,90,265.05 lakhs. In the samc way, during 2008.10, 16,44,326

houses were sanctioned with an estimated cast of Rs.5,63,181.66 lakhs and 4,57,462

Sanctiontd

2030705

Year

2006-07

Fstimatc cost is. in Llkhs )

695516.47

11

111

were houses were completed with an expenditure of Rs.1,56.680.73 lakhs. In Tod,

Phase

1

Erprndlturc (Rs. in Lakhs)

512992.13

during 2006-2010 under all the three phases 56.56.850 houses w m sanctioned wit11

1981819

1644326

5656850

an estimated of Rs,19,37,471.13 lakhs and 30,94,711 houses were completed with an

expenditure of Rs.10,5Y,938.51 lekhs. Fig, 4.8 Bnr Diagram shuwing yeur wise

1139460

457462

309471 1

completed and expenditure in rum1 housing under Indirmmn.

678773.00

563181.66

1937471.13

390265.05

156680.73

105W58.51

I I 1 I I J

Source: A.P. State Housing Cotporntion Limited, Hydaabad.2010.

Tnble 4.13 Statement Sbowbg Schema Wise Saa- Canapktrd and Expendlturs of

The table 4.12 shows that VAMBAY scheme mnctioned 99,221 howes dwing

2001-06 and completed 99,188 houses with an expenditure of Rs.45934.47 lalcha by

keeping 33 houses pending for further construction and completion in urban arm.

The RGK scheme during 2005-10 sanctioned 23,104 howca with an

expenditure of Rs.20,022.60 lakhs. It is worth mentioning that 22,352 houses were

completed.

4

5

6

The iHSDP scheme sanctioned 25,170 houses during 2005-10 and completed

18,015 houses with an expenditure of Rs.18,%8.75 lakhs, However, 7,155 howw

were pending. .

2006-07

2

2008-10

Indiramma Phase1 lndiramma P b I l lndiramma Phase-UI

In total all these schemes have sandioned 1,47,495 howca and 1,39455

houses wae completed with an expenditure of Rs.84,925,82 lakhs.

Totd

Under Indimmn PhasaI ( 2 0 7 ) , 1,52,130 h o m were sanctioned and

86,589 houses were cmtmtcd with the expenditure of b.2J97.67 labs. But

65,541 houses wae pading. 1,44,876 houses wm sandonsd with an exparditwe of

152130

144876

77067

374073

86589

79061

31648

196698

2597.67

2371.83

9 3 1 4

5900.94

Rs.2,371.83 lslchs lmda ~adinmma ~basa-n (mo7-08), But d y 79,061 bous*l wat

completcd and 65,815 imuscm were paadinlt So also Mda PhruaIU (2008-lo),

77,067, homes wen aanctiontd with Rs.931.44 1- but 46,019 houses were

pending.

By and large, under INDIRAMMA housing scbanc, 3,74,073 houses ware

sanctioned with an amount of Rs.5,900.94 lakhs and 1,%,698 hauses wen completed

and 1,77,375 houses ware patding.

The progress in housing and allocation of fimd8 hr d how schemes in

Andhm Pradesh is not adequate.

The hypothesis is rejected

Number of schanes like RPH, SPR, IAY, WEAVERS, BEEDI WORKERS,

FISHERMEN, VAMBAY, ROK, MSDP and INDIRAMMA implanmted in A.P,

with lot of M. Hence the Hypothesis i.c. "Allocation of funds for rural housing

schemes in Andhra Pradesh is not adequate" and is njccted.

REFERENCES

1. Directorate of Census Opcmtiaas, Andbra Mesh. 2. Note on Weaker Section Hwshrg P r o m AP Sw Housiq Corpontion

Litad, Hydcfabd.

3. A.P.State Housing Corporation, Hydaabad.

4. www.housing.gov,ap.in