characteristics of positive cloud to ground flashes...

26
CHARACTERISTICS OF POSITIVE CLOUD TO GROUND FLASHES IN MALAYSIA AND CORRELATION WITH CLOUD TOP HEIGHT YUGESWARI A/P THURAISAMY UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2019

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

CHARACTERISTICS OF POSITIVE CLOUD TO GROUND FLASHES IN

MALAYSIA AND CORRELATION WITH CLOUD TOP HEIGHT

YUGESWARI A/P THURAISAMY

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

CHARACTERISTICS OF POSITIVE CLOUD TO GROUND FLASHES IN

MALAYSIA AND CORRELATION WITH CLOUD TOP HEIGHT

YUGESWARI A/P THURAISAMY

A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the

requirements for the award of the degree of

Master of Engineering Electrical (Power)

Faculty of Electrical Engineering

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

JANUARY 2018

iii

To my beloved parents, sister,

mighty supervisor, lecturers, friends and to those helped me to complete this

project successfully

iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

On the very kickoff of this thesis, I would like to spread my heartfelt and sincere

obligation towards all the dignitaries who have helped and guided me in this striving. I

am sure that I would not have made headway in this project without their guidance,

encouragement and cooperation.

I am overwhelmingly appreciative to my supervisor, Dr. Mona Riza binti Md Esa for

constant guidance and priceless encouragement to accomplish this project. In addition, I

would like to thank Jabatan Meteorologi Malaysia for their help and cooperation in

helping me to use their facilities to aid my project as well.

Nevertheless, I also would like to take this opportunity to thank my family and friends

who supported me, without them I would not have reached this far.

Last but not least, I would also extend my gratitude to Faculty of Electrical Engineering,

Univerti Teknologi Malaysia for giving me this valuable opportunity.

Any omission in this brief strap line does not mean lack of thankfulness.

Thanking and Appreciating You

Yugeswari Thuraisamy

v

ABSTRACT

Positive cloud to ground (CG) flashes lowers positive charges from cloud to

ground. Positive CG grasps more attention since they are highly allied with severe

thunderstorms. Positive CG is known to account only approximately 10% out of all CG

flashes. The positive CG can be compared with negative CG, IC (intra cloud) and NBE

(narrow bipolar event) flashes. The experimental setup to capture the electric field

produced by the lightning flashes has taken place at UTeM Melaka. The measurement

setup consists of 2 parallel plates, buffer circuit, antenna, high speed camera, GPS,

Picoscope digitizer, and computer. The NBE, preliminary breakdown pulses, and first

return stroke are included in this process. From the recorded data, very few positive CG

have been captured. This is because the occurrence of positive CG is very less in low

latitude countries due to the absence or very less anvil shape of the clouds. It is found that

the occurrence of positive CG is very less about which is approximately 1.275% by

average in two days and the cloud top height is about 13km to 14 km during the occurrence

of positive CG.

vi

ABSTRAK

Kilat jenis positive cloud to ground (+CG) berlaku disebabkan oleh caj positif

dibawa turun dari awan ke tanah. +CG harus diberikan lebih perhatian kerana ia memberi

kemungkinan besar kepada kejadian hujan yang disertai guruh dan kilat yang sangat kuat

dengan kekerapan yang tinggi. Dianggarkan hanya 10% dari jumlah kilat yang direkodkan

adalah +CG dan ia boleh dibandingkan dengan jenis-jenis kilat yang lain seperti negative

CG, intracloud (IC) dan Narrow Bipolar Event (NBE). Sistem pengukuran kilat yang telah

dipasang di Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM) terdiri daripada 2 antena plat

selari, litar pengikut (buffer), kamera kelajuan tinggi, GPS, Pendigit Picoscope, komputer

peribadi dan unit storan luaran. Sebanyak 4000 data yang dikumpulkan pada 29hb dan

30hb Mac 2017 dan telah dianalisis. Semua data yang dipilih untuk dianalisis adalah

terdiri daripada kejadian kilat iaitu NBE, seluruh proses +CG bermula dari Preliminary

Breakdown Process (PBP) sehingga Return Stroke pertama. Dari senarai data yang telah

direkodkan, didapati hanya kira-kira 1.275% dari 4000 data adalah +CG dan kebanyakan

berada di paras ketinggian awan antara 13 km hingga 14 km. Kekurangan kejadian +CG

di Malaysia adalah disebabkan kedudukan Malaysia di kawasan berlatitud rendah.

Pembentukan awan berbentuk andas atau landasan (Anvil Cloud) yang jarang juga

penyebab kepada kurangnya +CG direkodkan di Malaysia.

vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER TITLE PAGE

DECLARATION ii

DEDICATION iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv

ABSTRACT v

ABSTRAK vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS vii

LIST OF TABLES ix

LIST OF FIGURES x

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiii

LIST OF SYMBOLS xv

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of Study

1.2 Problem Statement

1.3 Objectives

1.4 Scope of Study

1.5 Thesis Outline

1

4

5

5

6

2 LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Formation of Thunderstorm

2.2 Cloud Electrification

2.3 Types of Flashes

7

9

11

viii

2.3.1 Positive CG Flashes

2.3.2 Negative CG Flashes

2.3.3 Intracloud Flashes and Narrow Bipolar

Pulses

2.4 Continuing Current Intensity in Positive CG

2.5 Characteristics of Leader Pulses in Positive CG

2.6 Positive Return Stroke

2.7 Luminosity of Return Stroke

11

12

12

15

17

19

22

3 METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Experimental Setup

3.3 Flow Chart of Research Work

3.4 Picoscope Software

3.5 CAPPI and RADAR Data

3.6 Radar on a map view for Peninsular Malaysia

24

25

30

31

32

35

4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Introduction

4.2 Sample of Positive CG Waveforms

4.3 Positive CG Flashes Correlated with Radar and

CAPPI Data

4.4 Cloud Top Height Versus Number of Flashes on

29th and 30th March 2017

4.4.1 Comparison of Positive CG and Negative

CG

4.4.2 Comparison of Positive CG and Intracloud

4.4.3 Comparison of Positive CG and NBP

37

39

41

52

54

55

57

5 CONCLUSIONS

5.1 Conclusion

5.2 Future Works

58

59

REFERENCES 60

ix

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE

NO.

TITLE PAGE

2.1 Positive strokes and continuing current parameters 16

4.1 Categorization of positive CG 41

4.2 Categorization of positive CG 44

4.3 Categorization of positive CG 46

4.4 Some positive CG characteristics measured 48

4.5 Categorization of positive CG 48

4.6 Categorization of positive CG 50

4.7 Comparison of negative and positive CG 54

4.8 Comparison of intracloud and positive CG 55

4.9 Comparison of NBP and positive CG 57

x

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE

NO.

TITLE PAGE

1.1 Stepped leader channel before attachment 2

1.2 Electric field charge for positive CG 4

2.1 Statistical value of occurrence of the NPBP event in Sri

Lanka

13

2.2 Number of leader pulses observed in Sweden 18

3.1 Experimental setup at UTeM, Melaka 25

3.2 Parallel plate antenna 26

3.3 The example circuit of the experimental setup to

measure electrical field using op-amp

27

3.4 Magnetic field detector 27

3.5 Picoscope digitizer 28

3.6 Block diagram for lightning monitoring system 29

3.7 Project research flowchart 30

xi

3.8 IRIS software portraying cross section of the cloud and

reflectivity

31

3.9 Voltage and time axis on Picoscope 32

3.10 Selection of probe 33

3.11 Selection of voltage range 33

3.12 Selection of time range 34

3.13 How radar works 35

3.14 Block diagram of radar 36

4.1 Lightning events categorized Microsoft Excel 38

4.2 Channels for electric and magnetic fields 38

4.3 Positive CG with 4 return strokes 39

4.4 Positive CG with PBP and return stroke 39

4.5 Positive CG without PBP and return stroke 40

4.6 Positive CG analysed in Picoscope 41

4.7 Radar data on IRIS 42

4.8 Properties of cloud at 2 km 42

4.9 Scale and measurement for radar and rain fall rate 43

4.10 Positive CG analysed in Picoscope 44

4.11 Radar data on IRIS 44

4.12 Properties of cloud at 2 km 45

xii

4.13 Radar data on 30th March 2017 45

4.14 Positive CG analysed in Picoscope 46

4.15 Radar data on IRIS 46

4.16 Properties of cloud at 2 km 47

4.17 Cross section of cloud 47

4.18 Positive CG analysed in Picoscope 48

4.19 Radar data on IRIS 49

4.20 Properties of cloud at 2 km 49

4.21 Cross section of cloud 49

4.22 Pressure VS Time 51

4.23 Temperature VS Time 51

4.24 Number of flashes vs cloud top height vs time 52

4.25 Negative CG observed in Picoscope 54

4.26 Positive CG observed in Picoscope 54

4.27 Intrcloud observed in Picoscope 55

4.28 Positive CG observed in Picoscope 55

4.29 NBP observed in Picoscope 57

4.30 Positive CG observed in Picoscope 57

xiii

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

CAPPI - constant altitude plan position indicator

CG - cloud to ground

CID - compact intracloud

IC - intracloud

IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

IRIS - Interactive Radar Information System

MDF - magnetic directional finding

NBE - narrow bipolar event

NBP - narrow bipolar pulse

NNBE - narrow negative bipolar event

NNBP - narrow negative bipolar pulse

xiv

NPBP - narrow positive bipolar pulse

PBP - preliminary breakdown pulse

RC - resistor capacitor circuit

RS - return stroke

Vs - versus

UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka

xv

LIST OF SYMBOLS

+ - positive

- negative

oC - degree Celsius

Q - charge

C - Coulomb

ms - millisecond

A - ampere

kA - kiloampere

km - kilometer

µs - microsecond

% - percent

ms-1 - meter per second

xvi

oN - degree North

oE - degree East

Hz - Hertz

kHz - kilo Hertz

1st - first

dBz - decibel relative to reflectivity factor

hPa - hectoPascal

V - Volt

mV - milli Volt

nF - nanofarad

pF - picofarad

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of Study

When a huge electrical discharge occurs in the atmosphere of the Earth, a lightning

is produced which have a total length of tens kilometers or more. Thunderclouds produce

most of the lightning and it is said more than half of the discharges would remain inside

the clouds. In common, most of the cloud to ground (CG) flashes lower the negative

charges to ground but there also events whereby positive charges are also being lowered

to ground which is known as positive cloud to ground flashes [1]. All types of CGs can

easily kill people and would cause millions of dollars when it comes to property damages.

The lightning activity follows a specific pattern with the intracloud (IC) lightning,

specifically appearing in the developing stage followed by CG during the mature stage

and on the other hand both types of lightning also can happen in the stage of decay of

thunderstorms [2]. Because of the simplicity to study, the CG discharge remains the most

remarkable despite the significant interest in the IC and other several transient optical

phenomena in the atmosphere [3].

2

At the beginning of a lightning, most CG starts within the cloud whereby there are

huge concentrations of positive and negative space charges. Then, preliminary cloud

breakdown triggers an intermittent, discharge that has branches that propagates in all

directions which is known as stepped leader. Once the stepped leader’s tip gets close to

the surface of the ground, the large electric field is produced near the surface which can

cause one or more upward propagating discharges to develop. On the other hand, first

return stroke is developed when an upward moving discharge makes contact with the

stepped leader, it is wave of ionization which is intense which begins just above the ground

that moves up the leader channel which is about one third of the speed of light [1].

A normal value of the peak current is almost 40,000 amperes and the peak electric

power that is dissolute by a return stroke is about 100 million watts per meter [1]. The

speedy expansion of the hot and high-pressure channel can produce shock waves and this

may result in thunder with its characteristics. The ground potential will be carried by the

currents in the return stroke which will neutralize most of the channels of the leader.

Approximately after 40 to 80 milliseconds, the CG flashes produce a new leader which is

the dart leader whereby it propagates down the previous return stroke channel and starts a

subsequent return stroke. Most of the flashes has 2 to 4 return strokes with each upsetting

a variety volume of cloud charges.

Figure 1.1 Stepped leader channel before attachment

3

The probability of lightning to strike to ground in more than one spot if the dart

leader chooses a different path to ground than the earlier stroke. In the recent year of study,

some discoveries have been made which is both the in cloud and CG flashes can generate

very fast rising currents. Some non-equilibrium gas traces are generated within the high

temperature channels of the lightning and by also the shock waves that can affect

tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry [1].

One of the important parameters that need to be considered is the number of

lightning strikes per unit time per unit area or is known as flash density [4]. The chemical

properties of the lightning can play a vital role in the prebiotic synthetization of amino

acids, besides that lightning is also still a source of fixed nitrogen, a natural fertilizer.

Besides its many deleterious effects, lightning also has some unique benefits. Throughout

the whole world, the dynamics of the ecosystems of forest has been dominated by the

lightning fired fires. The radiation of the electromagnetic fields can be utilized to study

the physics of propagation of radio and also long used in the study of geophysical.

To maintain the electric charge on earth, lightning charges can be very helpful. Some

techniques have been identified to measure the properties of lightning which are acoustic,

optical and electromagnetic sensors to estimate the characteristics of different discharges

procedures on time scales ranging from tens of nanoseconds to some seconds. Early

flashes documentation which lowers the positive charges from cloud to ground has been

found in Berger’s classical research (1967) which took place at Mount San Salvatore

above Lake Lugano in Switzerland [1]. The measurements that must be taken into

considerations are the electrostatic field change for the whole flash, fast electric and

magnetic field wave forms for the return stroke.

4

Figure 1.2 Electric field change for positive CG

1.2 Problem Statement

In general, positive lightning positive to ground flashes lowers positive charge from

the cloud to ground whereby it happens very rarely [2]. It is only accounted about 10% of

all the charges are positive CG [2]. Hence, the occurrences of positive CG in Malaysia are

very rare compared to the positive Narrow Bipolar Events (+NBE) and negative CG.

Many reviews and studies have been done on NBE and negative CG. Since positive CG

is very rare, the characteristics of it have not been fully studied and discovered. When

considering the tripole structure, the scarcity of the positive CG flashes can be easily

accepted. Nevertheless, inside a cloud, the structure of it is still remain unresolved.

The research whether the climate in Malaysia has a significant production of

positive CG will be studied and analyzed. The other types of CGs namely negative CG,

positive NBE, intracloud charges have been studied and compared with positive CG to

see and investigate the differences in them. In this research, the evolution of thunderstorm

cloud top height which is obtained from the radar data has been analysed to correlate the

5

cloud top height with positive CG occurrences. Besides that, the research on the influence

of positive CG to the thunderstorm in Malaysia has been done as well.

1.3 Objectives

The objectives that should be achieved throughout this project are:

i. To study the rainfall and thunderstorm rate in Malaysia correlate with the positive CG

occurrences

ii. To investigate the correlation between positive CG with the cloud top height and study

the possibility of it to contribute to the evolution of thunderstorms

1.4 Scope of Study

This study is focused on the:

i. Comparison between positive CG and other type of flashes

ii. Analysis of the correlation between positive CG and cloud top height

6

1.5 Thesis Outline

This thesis comprises of five main chapters which are introduction, literature

review, research methodology, results and discussion and conclusion. Firstly, for the

introduction part, it consists of background of study, problem statement, objectives, scope

of study and thesis outline. Basically, for chapter one, it is more to the starter and overview

of this project.

On the other hand, for Chapter two is the literature review part. In this chapter,

upon studying and analyzing many journals from the trusted and reliable website like

IEEE, summarization or abstract of the journals of renown authors have been done.

Precisely, the formation of thunderstorm, cloud electrification, types of flashes which are

positive CG, negative CG, intracloud and NBP, continuing current intensity in positive

CG, characteristics of leader pulses in positive CG, positive return stroke and luminosity

of return stroke are discussed in detail in this chapter.

For the third chapter, it is the research methodology part whereby the experimental

setup, how measurements and data are taken are discussed here. Here, the flow chart of

research work, introduction of certain software like IRIS software, Picoscope software,

CAPPI and RADAR Data are also being deliberated here.

Fourthly, results and discussion part whereby the results of the project is revealed

here. Sample of positive CG waveforms, positive CG correlated with Radar and CAPPI

Data, cloud top height versus number of flashes on 29th and 30th March 2017 are written

in the thesis. Furthermore, comparison of other flashes with positive CG is also included.

Lastly, is the conclusion and recommendation part whereby the findings of the

project are discussed with suitable recommendations.

60

REFERENCES

1. Geophysics Study Committee, Geophysics Research Forum, Commission on

Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources National Research Council,

The Earth’s Electrical Environment, ISBN 0-309-03680-1

2. Pitri Bhakta Adhikari, Shriram Sharma, Kedarnath Baral, Features of

positive ground flashes observed in Kathmandu Nepal, Journal of Atmospheric

and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Volume 145, July 2016, Pages 106-113, ISSN

1364-6826

3. Chin-Leong Wooi, Zulkurnain Abdul-Malek, Noor-Azlinda Ahmad, Ali I.

El Gayar, Statistical analysis of electric field parameters for negative lightning

in Malaysia, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Volume 146,

August 2016, Pages 69-80, ISSN 1364-6826

4. Xiangzhen Kong, Yang Zhao, Tong Zhang, Huaibin Wang, Optical and

electrical characteristics of in-cloud discharge activity and downward leaders in

positive cloud-to-ground lightning flashes, Atmospheric Research, Volume 160,

15 June 2015, Pages 28-38, ISSN 0169-8095

5. Scott D. Rudlosky, Henry E. Fuelberg, Dept. of Meteorology, Florida State

University, Characteristics of Positive Cloud-to-Ground Lightning

61

6. P. Chowdhuri, "Parameters of lightning strokes and their effects on power

systems," 2001 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and

Exposition. Developing New Perspectives (Cat. No.01CH37294), Atlanta, GA,

2001, pp. 1047-1051 vol.2

7. T. A. L. N. Gunasekara, U. Mendis, M. Fernando, U. Sonnadara and V.

Cooray, "Electric field signatures of narrow negative bipolar pulse activities

from lightning observed in Sri Lanka," 2014 International Conference on

Lightning Protection (ICLP), Shanghai, 2014, pp. 624-628

8. S.R. Sharma, M. Fernando, Vernon Cooray, Narrow positive bipolar

radiation from lightning observed in Sri Lanka, Journal of Atmospheric and

Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Volume 70, Issue 10, July 2008, Pages 1251-1260,

ISSN 1364-6826

9. C. Schumann and M. M. F. Saba, "Continuing current intensity in positive

ground flashes," 2012 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP),

Vienna, 2012,

10. Dalina Johari, Vernon Cooray, Mahbubur Rahman, Pasan Hettiarachchi,

Mohd Muzafar Ismail, Characteristics of leader pulses in positive ground

flashes in Sweden, Electric Power Systems Research, Available online 9

December 2016, ISSN 0378-7796

11. P.R. Krehbiel M. Brook R. Mccrory "An analysis of the charge structure of

lightning discharges to the ground" 1. Geophys. Res 84 n. NC5 pp. 2432-56

1979.

12. M. M. F. Saba O. Pinto Jr. and M. G. Ballarotti "Relation between lightning

return stroke peak current and following continuing current" Geophys. Res. Lett.

33 L23807 doi: I 0.1 029/2006GL027455 2006

62

13. B. Zhu, M. Ma, W. Xu and D. Ma, "Some features of negative cloud-to-ground

flashes from a local thunderstorm based on accurate-strokecount study," 2014

International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Shanghai, 2014, pp.

1657-1660

14. Yanan Zhu, Vladimir A. Rakov, Shreeharsh Mallick, Manh D. Tran,

Characterization of negative cloud-to-ground lightning in Florida, Journal of

Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Volume 136, Part A, December

2015, Pages 8-15, ISSN 1364-6826

15. E. P. Krider, K. L. Cummins, C. J. Biagi, S. A. Fleenor and J. G. Wilson,

"Small negative strokes in cloud-to-ground lightning flashes," 2010 30th

International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Cagliari, 2010, pp. 1-3

16. D. Peng-Fei, K. Zheng, H. Yue-Qi and G. Wei-Qi, "The temporal evolution of

charge structure in a simulated thunderstorm," 2015 7th Asia-Pacific

Conference on Environmental Electromagnetics (CEEM), Hangzhou, 2015, pp.

372-375

17. Z.A. Baharudin, Noor Azlinda Ahmad, J.S. Mäkelä, Mahendra Fernando,

Vernon Cooray, Negative cloud-to-ground lightning flashes in Malaysia,

Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Volume 108, February

2014, Pages 61-67, ISSN 1364-6826

18. Rosangela Barreto Biasi Gin, Cesar Augustus Assis Beneti, Marcos

Jusevicius, Augusto Pereira Filho, High Peak Current in Long Continuing

Luminosity of Positive Flashes

19. Muhammad Abu Bakar Sidik, Hamizah Binti Shahroom, Zainal Salam,

Zokafle Buntat, Zainuddin Nawawi, Hussein Ahmad, Muhammad ’Irfan

63

Jambak, Yanuar Zulardiansyah Arief, “Lightning monitoring system for

sustainable energy supply: A review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy

Reviews, Volume 48, August 2015, Pages 710-725, ISSN 1364-0321

20. P.I. Nikitin, B.G. Gorshkov, E.P. Nikitin, T.I. Ksenevich, “Picoscope, a new

label-free biosensor”, In Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Volumes 111–112,

2005, Pages 500-504, ISSN 0925-4005