cherenkov radiation energy loss of runaway...

25
Cherenkov Radiation energy loss of runaway electrons Chang Liu, Dylan Brennan, Amitava Bhattacharjee Princeton University, PPPL Allen Boozer Columbia University 1 Runaway Electron Meeting 2016 Pertuis, France Jun 7 2016

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2021

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Cherenkov Radiation energy loss of runaway electronsChang Liu, Dylan Brennan, Amitava BhattacharjeePrinceton University, PPPLAllen BoozerColumbia University

    1

    Runaway Electron Meeting 2016Pertuis, France

    Jun 7 2016

  • Outline•  Introduction to Cherenkov radiation in plasma

    •  Lenard-Balescu collision operator

    • Cherenkov radiation in unmagnetized plasma• Radiative energy loss• Correction to Coulomb logarithm

    • Cherenkov radiation in magnetized plasma•  Transit-time magnetic pumping (TTMP) momentum loss

    •  Summary

    2

  • Outline•  Introduction to Cherenkov radiation in plasma

    •  Lenard-Balescu collision operator

    • Cherenkov radiation in unmagnetized plasma• Radiative energy loss• Correction to Coulomb logarithm

    • Cherenkov radiation in magnetized plasma•  Transit-time magnetic pumping (TTMP) momentum loss

    •  Summary

    3

  • •  Cherenkov radiation is emitted when a charged particle passed through a dielectric medium at a speed greater than wave phase velocity in that medium.

    •  The condition for Cherenkov radiation is n>1/β (n=kc/ω, β=v/c).•  For plasma waves and runaway electrons (β~1), this condition is easy to

    satisfy.

    Introduction: Cherenkov radiation

    4

  • Introduction: Lenard-Balescu collision operator and Cherenkov radiation in plasmas

    •  The polarization drag originates from the polarization of the plasma medium due to the electric field of a test particle, which is related to the Cherenkov radiation energy loss.•  For ω/k~vth, the excited mode is strongly Landau damped and the energy

    is absorbed by bulk electrons.•  For ω/k≫vth, the mode is weakly damped (mainly through collisions), and

    energy gets radiated away.

    5

    C[ f ]= ∂

    ∂v⋅ q

    m⎛⎝⎜

    ⎞⎠⎟ E

    p f −D ⋅ ∂ f∂v

    ⎡⎣⎢

    ⎤⎦⎥

    Ep: Polarization drag electric fieldD: Diffusion from electric field fluctuation

    D = 1

    2qm

    ⎛⎝⎜

    ⎞⎠⎟2

    dk δEδE (k,ω = k ⋅v)∫

    Test particle superposition principle

  • Outline•  Introduction to Cherenkov radiation in plasma

    •  Lenard-Balescu collision operator

    • Cherenkov radiation in unmagnetized plasma• Radiative energy loss• Correction to Coulomb logarithm

    • Cherenkov radiation in magnetized plasma•  Transit-time magnetic pumping (TTMP) momentum loss

    •  Summary

    6

  • Electron waves in unmagnetized plasma

    •  In unmagnetized plasma, the electron waves have two branches (ignoring ion effects and thermal correction)

    • 

    • 

    •  For Cherenkov radiation, only Langmuir wave is possible (n>1).

    7

    Langmuir wave: ω 2 =ω p2

    Electronmagnetic wave: ω 2 = k2c2 +ω p2

    0.1 0.5 1 5 100

    1

    2

    3

    4

    ω/ωpen

  • The energy loss from Cherenkov radiation

    •  To solve the energy loss due to Cherenkov radiation, one can calculate the excited electric field from a single moving electron in the medium.

    •  The current from a single moving electron

    •  The time-averaged electric field felt by the moving electron

    •  The energy loss is then Ep·j.

    8

    Ampere's lawFaraday's law

    ⎫⎬⎪

    ⎭⎪→ k × k ×E+ ω

    c⎛⎝⎜

    ⎞⎠⎟

    2

    ε ⋅E = − 4πiωc2

    j

    j(x,t) = −evδ (x − x0 − vt)→ j(k,ω ) = −evδ (ω − k ⋅v)exp(ik ⋅x0 )

    Ep = d 3k dω E(k,ω )exp −ik(x0 + vt)+ iωt[ ]∫∫ t

    Cherenkov resonance

  • Cherenkov radiation energy loss in unmagnetized plasma•  For unmagnetized plasma

    •  Assume electron is moving along z direction,

    •  The principal value of the integral is imaginary, which will not contribute to the energy loss. •  However, the residues (which correspond to the modes that satisfy the

    Cherenkov radiation condition) will give real contribution and energy loss.

    9

    ε = 1−

    ω p2

    ω 2⎛

    ⎝⎜⎞

    ⎠⎟1 = ε1

    Ezp = d 3kdω

    4πi evc2 ε −k!2c2

    ω 2⎛⎝⎜

    ⎞⎠⎟

    ωε ε − k2c2

    ω 2⎛⎝⎜

    ⎞⎠⎟

    ∫ δ (ω − k ⋅v), k! =k ⋅vv

  • Correction to Coulomb logarithm due to Cherenkov radiation loss•  Using the residue theorem to calculate the integral

    •  Note that we use the cold plasma approximation, so we can choose kmax=1/λD to ensure thermal effect is not important.

    10

    Ezp =

    eω p2

    v2sinθdθcosθ

    σ (θ ), σ (θ ) =1, if cosθ >ω p / kmaxv

    0, if cosθ >ω p / kmaxv

    ⎧⎨⎪

    ⎩⎪∫

    =eω p

    2

    v2ln kmaxv

    ω pθ Is the wave emittance angle

  • Correction to lnΛ for the drag force

    •  Recall that the drag force in the Landau collision operator due to binary collisions can be written as

    •  Cherenkov radiation energy loss gives a correction to lnΛ

    •  In DIII-D QRE experiments, for highly relativistic runaway electrons, this correction is about 20%.

    •  For electron starting to run away (v≪c), this correction is small.

    11

    Edrag =eω p

    2

    v2lnΛ, Λ = bmax

    bmin

    bmax = λD , bmin = maxeαeβmαβu

    2 ,!

    2mαβu⎧⎨⎪

    ⎩⎪

    ⎫⎬⎪

    ⎭⎪

    lnΛ→ lnΛ + ln vvth

    ⎛⎝⎜

    ⎞⎠⎟

  • Outline•  Introduction to Cherenkov radiation in plasma

    •  Lenard-Balescu collision operator

    • Cherenkov radiation in unmagnetized plasma• Radiative energy loss• Correction to Coulomb logarithm

    • Cherenkov radiation in magnetized plasma•  Transit-time magnetic pumping (TTMP) momentum loss

    •  Summary

    12

  • Cherenkov radiation in magnetized plasma

    •  The dielectric tensor and the dispersion relation in magnetized plasma (ignoring ions and thermal effects)

    •  The allowed wave branches for Cherenkov radiation are: Langmuir wave, extraordinary-electron (EXEL) wave, and upper-hybrid wave (electrostatic Bernstein wave).

    13

    0.1 0.5 1 5 100

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    ω/ωpen

    ωce

    θ=5°

    n=1/cosθ

    ε =

    1−ω pe

    2

    ω 2 −ω ce2 −i

    ω ceω

    ω pe2

    ω 2 −ω ce2 0

    iω ceω

    ω pe2

    ω 2 −ω ce2 1−

    ω pe2

    ω 2 −ω ce2 0

    0 0 1−ω pe

    2

    ω 2

    ⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜

    ⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟

    G.I. Pokol, A. Kómár, A. Budai, A. Stahl, and T. Fülöp, Phys. Plasmas 21, 102503 (2014).

  • 0.1 0.5 1 5 100

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    ω/ωpen

    Cherenkov radiation in magnetized plasma

    •  The dielectric tensor and the dispersion relation in magnetized plasma (ignoring ions and thermal effects)

    •  The allowed wave branches for Cherenkov radiation are: Langmuir wave, extraordinary-electron (EXEL) wave, and upper-hybrid wave (electrostatic Bernstein wave).

    14

    ωUH

    θ=80°

    n=1/cosθ

    ε =

    1−ω pe

    2

    ω 2 −ω ce2 −i

    ω ceω

    ω pe2

    ω 2 −ω ce2 0

    iω ceω

    ω pe2

    ω 2 −ω ce2 1−

    ω pe2

    ω 2 −ω ce2 0

    0 0 1−ω pe

    2

    ω 2

    ⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜

    ⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟

    G.I. Pokol, A. Kómár, A. Budai, A. Stahl, and T. Fülöp, Phys. Plasmas 21, 102503 (2014).

  • Wave frequency for Cherenkov radiation

    •  For a given emittance angle of k, one can calculate the wave frequency that satisfies the Cherenkov radiation condition.

    •  For ωce~ωpe, one emittance angle gives one solution of ω, which shifts from ωpe to ωUH.

    15

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    θ

    ω/ω

    pe

    ω1=ωpe

    ω2=ωUH

    ωce=3ωpe

    0.1 0.5 1 5 100

    1

    2

    3

    4

    ω/ωpe

    n

    θ=0.5

    n=1/cosθ

  • •  For a given emittance angle of k, one can calculate the wave frequency that satisfies the Cherenkov radiation condition.

    •  For ωce≫ωpe, there are 3 branches of ω roots, which all coexist in a range of emittance angle.

    Wave frequency for Cherenkov radiation (cont’d)

    16

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    θ

    ω/ω

    pe

    0.1 0.5 1 5 100

    1

    2

    3

    4

    ω/ωpe

    nω1=ωpe

    ω2=ωUH

    ωce=10ωpe

    θ=0.2

    n=1/cosθ

  • •  For a given emittance angle of k, one can calculate the wave frequency that satisfies the Cherenkov radiation condition.

    •  For ωce≫ωpe, there are 3 branches of ω roots, which all coexist in a range of emittance angle.

    0.5 1 5 10

    0.96

    0.98

    1.00

    1.02

    1.04

    1.06

    1.08

    1.10

    ω/ωpe

    n

    Wave frequency for Cherenkov radiation (cont’d)

    17

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    θ

    ω/ω

    pe

    ω1=ωpe

    ω2=ωUH

    ωce=10ωpe

    θ=0.2

    n=1/cosθ

  • Cherenkov radiation energy loss in magnetized plasma•  We can use the same method to calculate the Cherenkov radiation energy

    loss.•  Assume that electron is moving perfectly along B field (no v⊥)

    •  Although the radiation loss from small emittance angle (Langmuir) and large angle (Upper-hybrid) stays the same, intermediate angle (EXEL wave) gives additional energy loss.

    18

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.40

    5

    10

    15

    20

    θ

    A(θ)

    ωce/ωpe=0.2

    ωce/ωpe=3

    ωce/ωpe=10 Ezp =

    eω pe2

    v2sinθdθcosθ

    A(θ )∫

  • Effects of 3 modes on Cerenkov radiation energy loss

    •  All the 3 modes contributed to the Cherenkov radiation energy loss•  For ωce≫ωpe, the radiation emittance is strongly peaked at certain

    angle.

    19

    Total

    ωce/ωpe=10

  • Cherenkov radiation energy loss in magnetized plasma (cont’d)•  The Coulomb logarithm in the drag force has a correction

    20

    Δ2 =x(a1x + a0 )(x2 + b1x + b0 )

    , x = ω ceω pe

    a1 = 2.05,a0 = 9.51b1 = 1.63,b0 = 26.23

    0 2 4 6 8 100.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    ωce/ωpe

    Δ 2

    lnΛ→ lnΛ + ln vvth

    ⎛⎝⎜

    ⎞⎠⎟+ Δ2

  • Transit-time magnetic pumping (TTMP) associated with Cherenkov radiation•  Now we consider runaway electrons with finite v⊥.•  In addition to electric field, gradient of magnetic field can also cause

    momentum loss in parallel direction

    •  Note that for electron moving near the speed of light, the effect from the electric force (E) and Lorentz force (v×B/c) can be of similar order.

    21

    Magnetic pumping: FTTMP = −µ∇Bz

  • TTMP momentum loss•  From Faraday’s law, Bz=kx cEy/ω. So the TTMP force can be calculated similarly from Ey.

    •  The ratio of TTMP over polarization electric force

    •  For high energy regime where synchrotron radiation energy loss dominates, v⊥/c~1/γ, the effect of TTMP is small.•  For high energy runaway electrons, synchrotron and Bremsstrahlung radiation dominate

    •  With fast pitch angle scattering mechanism (different from collisional scattering) such as whistler wave, the effect can be more important.

    22

    FTTMP =µω cec2ω pe

    ω pe2

    v2ln v

    vth

    ⎛⎝⎜

    ⎞⎠⎟− 121− vth

    v⎛⎝⎜

    ⎞⎠⎟ + Δ3

    ⎣⎢

    ⎦⎥

    0 2 4 6 8 100.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    ωce/ωpe

    Δ 3

    FTTMPeE p

    ≈ γ v⊥c

    ⎛⎝⎜

    ⎞⎠⎟2

  • Outline•  Introduction to Cherenkov radiation in plasma

    •  Lenard-Balescu collision operator

    • Cherenkov radiation in unmagnetized plasma• Radiative energy loss• Correction to Coulomb logarithm

    • Cherenkov radiation in magnetized plasma•  Transit-time magnetic pumping (TTMP) momentum loss

    •  Summary

    23

  • Summary•  Cherenkov radiation causes runaway electrons to lose energy, which can be

    described by adding a correction to the Coulomb logarithm in the drag force.•  The correction is about 20% compared to collisional force in DIII-D QRE

    experiment

    •  Magnetic field enhances Cherenkov radiation and energy loss.•  For runaway electrons with finite v⊥, TTMP will cause momentum loss on

    parallel direction.

    •  Future work:•  Including thermal effect in the plasma wave description•  Study the spiral orbit particle rather than straight orbit•  Study the electric field fluctuation given by Cherenkov radiation

    24

  • Questions for discussion1.  Can we detect the Cherenkov radiation from runaway electrons?

    2.  What is the correct physics interpretation of Cherenkov resonance condition when collisional damping is considered?

    25

    ω = k ⋅vexp(ikx − iωt)

    Imω < 0,Im k < 0 Wave is damping in time, but growing in space?Imω > 0,Im k > 0 Wave is damping in space, but growing in time?

    ⎧⎨⎪

    ⎩⎪

    B. J. Tobias et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 10E329 (2012)