chief executive officer round table sector forum
DESCRIPTION
Chief Executive Officer Round Table Sector Forum. Component II and the Agency Implementation Plan. Progress To Date. 4 Key Questions. Component I 15% across the board sustainability funding All not-for-profit organisations Component II Focus on what services are needed - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Chief Executive Officer Round Table
Sector Forum
Component II and the Agency Implementation Plan
Progress To Date
4 Key QuestionsComponent I15% across the board sustainability fundingAll not-for-profit organisations
Component IIFocus on what services are neededFocus on fair and appropriate price for servicesFocus on sustainabilityContracting reformsFixed amount of funding community sector $117m
4 Key Questions
1. Are we responding to the priority needs of the people with disabilities and their families ?
2. Are we investing in the best responses (service delivery models) ?
3. Have we applied the lens of the State-wide Sector Development Plan ?
4. How do we ensure a sustainable contract (pricing)?
Component II Timeframe
Submit Agency Implementation Plan (draft) 30 June 2012
Submit Agency Implementation Plan (final) 30 Sept 2012
Submit Financial Request Sept 2012
Expected decision by Treasury/Cabinet December 2012
Announcement by the Premier December 2012
Agency Implementation Plan1. Demonstrate how the services your agency purchases
align with Government direction and community need
2. Outline agency’s approach for reviewing its existing contracting arrangements to ensure that they align with the Delivering Community Services in Partnership (DCSP) Policy.
3. Summarise agency’s progress towards, and plans for, implementing the DCSP Policy and procurement reforms.
4. Consider the readiness of funded NFP community sector organisations to respond to the changing environment.
Steering Group for the Disability Sector Procurement Reforms
Sector
Representatives:
Terry Simpson
Rob Holmes
Michael Tait
Joan McKenna Kerr
Government
Representatives:
Peter Batini
Monique Williamson
Geoff Holden
Kylie Towie
Steering Group Terms of Reference
• Support the Policy (DCSP) principles and behaviour
• Inclusive approach in procurement reforms
• Discuss the issues, possible solutions and recommend.
• Provide communication strategies
• Guide capacity building strategies across the sector
• Minimise any unintended consequences
The Challenge
Optimal price may not equal the available budget
If so, how will we manage the difference …
a) reduce service levels in those contracts affected ?
b) reduce service levels in other contracts to redirect funding ?
c) choose alternative strategies to meet needs within the available budget ?
d) a combination of the above ?
Sector CollaborationSo far…• Consolidation of Program Outcomes to a simpler set of 4• Outcomes Based Contracting Pilot – flexible use of funds• Reviewing the Individualised Funding model• Sector Development Plan
Still ahead in 2012…• Review current processes to reduce the administration burden
(red tape)• Systematic review of services; in depth consultations• My Way project
2013 onwards… sequential implementation of the changes
4 Key Questions
1. Are we responding to the priority needs of the people with disabilities and their families ?
2. Are we investing in the best responses (service delivery models) ?
3. Have we applied the lens of the State-wide Sector Development Plan ?
4. How do we ensure a sustainable contract (pricing)?
Group discussion
What are the implications of ‘Component II and the Agency Implementation Plan’ for your organisation and for the sector?
Please prepare one or two questions for the general open forum discussion.
Outcomes Based Contracting in an Individualised Funding
environment
Opportunities and Challenges
The journey
Looking back
•Block funding
•Fixed program settings
•Inputs – output contracts
•Input – output reporting
Looking forward
•Individualised funding
•No programs
•Individualised planning
•Focus on outcomes
Challenges of working in an ‘outcomes’ environment
• Meeting people’s needs: achieving desired outcomes and facilitating this through contracting and funding allocations
• Pricing to ensure sustainable services: this includes DSC budgeting for the right services at the right price
• Measuring and reporting on outcomes
Outcome Areas
Health and Wellbeing Learn, Grow, DevelopRelationships Community belonging
How much ?Measurement: How well ? (disability standards)
What difference ?
Contextualise the outcome/ service to the individual
Individual plan
Strategies to be adopted Independent
Audit/Evaluation
The Components of Individual Funding
Strategies
Pricing
Funding allocationamount
Evaluation and
Reporting
Individual needs
analysis
Working Group for Individual FundingAndrew Jefferson - People with disabilities WA
Tara Ludlow - Carer’s Association of WA
Terry Simpson - National Disability Services
Gabriela Di Perna - National Disability Services
Darren Ginnelly – WAIS / My Place
Gordon Trewern – Nulsen
Lynne Darby - Directions Family Support Association
Rob Holmes - Enable SW
Shane Mauger - Activ Foundation Inc
Sue Howard - Community Vision Inc
Individual Funding Principles - Draft
• Maximises the achievement of people's individual outcomes.
• Maximises self-determination, choice and control for people.
• Fosters flexibility and innovation.
• Provides equitable and transparent funding allocation processes among people and enhances social capital.
• Is straight forward, understandable, manageable from a budgeting perspective.
Individual Funding Principles - Draft
• Is responsive to differences in the capacity of individuals to be involved in the system.
• Includes strong evaluation and self-improvement features that support accountability for outcomes and avoids any unnecessary reporting.
• Encourages a productive working relationship between the Commission, the people it aims to support, and the disability sector organisations based on trust, collaboration, and effective and sustainable service delivery.
Strategy = support hours (set by DSC)Price = fixed Business Rules rate (set by DSC).Allocation = fixed until new application
Strategy = standard list + innovative solutions offered by a service providerPrice = fixed for standard items, variable for others guided by principles. Allocation = reviewed annually
Strategy = variablePrice = to achieve outcomes Allocation = reviewed annually
Current
Future ?
How quickly do we move?Do we need all the steps?
A Re-pricing Journey
Where to from here?• Wide sector collaboration
• Develop an educational package for providers
• Resolve issues in current individual funding model, especially:
Information and technical support for individuals/families/carers
new funding allocation system
responding to changed needs
reporting and accountability framework
Group discussion
What are the implications of ‘Outcomes Based Contracting in an Individualised Funding environment’ for your organisation and for the sector?
Please prepare one or two questions for the general open forum discussion.
My WayMy Way
A ‘self directed supports and services’ project
Background
• National and international movement
• State government commitment
• Reflects Commission directions
What will it mean for people with disability?
• Choice and control • Individualised, person-centered support• Community inclusion • Focus on planning, developmental and
preventative approaches• Seamless, flexible funding• Decentralised decision making
What is it not all about!
• Not having choice – participation is voluntary
• Having to take control and responsibility for everything
• Funding
• 4 project sites• Broad consultation / focus groups• Implementation in partnership • The Model
– My Way coordinators (govt and non govt)– Choice – Focus on planning– Ongoing support – Funding (maybe)
The details … so far
Timeline• March to June - Consultation/development
• June - Announce project sites
• July to October - Community and sector engagement, recruitment and training
• November – Commence implementation in trial sites (person by person)
Group discussion
What are the implications of ‘My Way’ for your organisation and for the sector?
Please prepare one or two questions for the general open forum discussion.
Sector Development Plan
Plan Development – Geographical
Kelmscott
Kelmscott
Plan Development - State wide
Group discussion
What are the implications of the ‘Sector Development Plan’ for your organisation and for the sector?
Please prepare one or two questions for the general open forum discussion.