chw’s position on donation after cardiac death carol bayley vp ethics and justice education ethics...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac
Death
Carol BayleyVP Ethics and Justice
EducationEthics Champion Program
![Page 2: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Etiquette
Press * 6 to mute; Press # 6 to unmute Keep your phone on mute unless you
are dialoging with the presenter Never place phone on hold If you do not want to be called on
please check the red mood button on the lower left of screen
![Page 3: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Galloping History of Transplantation
1955 first major organ transplantation (DCD)
1962 immunosuppressive drugs 1968 Harvard Brain Death Criteria 1976 Quinlan allows withdrawal of life
support 1992 Pittsburg protocol; KIE Journal issue 1997 60 Minutes 1997, 2000 IOM reports
![Page 4: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Dead Donor Rule1997 IOM Report
In order to procure (“recover”) organs from a person, the person must be dead.
Seems obvious, but…
![Page 5: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Language has changed
(Brain dead donor=Heart-beating donor)
Non heart-beating organ donor (NHBD)
Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD)
Asystolic organ donation
![Page 6: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Language, cont’d Organ
“harvest” “procurement” “recovery”
Organ recovery is the politically correct usage, but
“Patient allowed to die in a way that facilitates recovery.” What?
![Page 7: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
There is a difference between old DCD and new
DCD
Old DCD: “uncontrolled” Patient found dead; organs recovered.
New DCD: “controlled” Patient in whom recovery is extremely unlikely has life-support removed under in a controlled environment; organs recovered.
![Page 8: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Old vs New
Old DCD Death happened on its own terms Organs recovered but sometimes not
in good condition New DCD
Organs recovered in better condition Death is negotiated
![Page 9: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Case 19 year old man hung himself; he was
expected to “progress” to brain death followed by organ donation; did not die.
OPO suggested DCD 10 days later, DCD performed
Patient taken to OR; life support removed 20 minutes later, heart stopped beating;
organs taken
![Page 10: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Arguments in support of DCD
Organ donation saves lives Pool of recipients has grown more
quickly than pool of donors 90,000 on waiting list; 6,000 die each
yr DCD may honor pt/family wish Family may find comfort in donation Donation nurtures altruism* DCD supported by transplant
community
![Page 11: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Arguments opposing DCD
Conflict of interest DCD manipulates definition of death
Pro literature first argued that Dead Donor Rule not violated; now same authors argue that violation of DDR is justified.
Is it two, five or ten minutes? Permanent and irreversible: depends on
intentions of those in OR
![Page 12: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Arguments opposed, cont’d
Do No Harm DCD procedures prior to taking
organs may not be in the patient’s best interest. (Ex)
Sometimes it doesn’t work Patient is returned to floor to die Families may be disappointed Pressure to succeed; strain on resources
![Page 13: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Arguments Opposed, cont’d. Informed Consent
Families are not told that testing procedures may hasten death.
Families are not told that there is a ethical debate—OPOs do not believe there IS ethical debate.
Substituted judgment difficult: very few individuals understand what is involved in process. People with pink dot signed up for something different.
![Page 14: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Camel’s nose under the tent…
15,000—35,000 persons in PVS. Almost 2/3 of medical directors and neurologists think PVS patients appropriate for organ donation (1993)
“Controlled suicidal donation” High C-fracture, conscious patients
![Page 15: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Delicate Consensus on End of Life Care may be
jeopardized
Withdrawal of treatment is difficult Some resist because they think we
are trying to save money, or that the loved one’s life is worthless
DCD could backfire, resulting in fewer donations overall
![Page 16: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
What is our duty?
Hold to CHW’s policy of no DCD; transfer when family requests.
Increase donations from brain dead patients (e.g., St John’s); increase number of organs recovered from each donor by following protocols and calling OPO promptly.
![Page 17: CHW’s Position on Donation After Cardiac Death Carol Bayley VP Ethics and Justice Education Ethics Champion Program](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbf5503460f94ab3634/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Moral(s) of the Story
Dying patients are not a means to another’s end, even a good end.
Some things take time. Birth takes time; death takes time.
Patients are persons, not an assemblage of spare parts.