ci 565 – dr. gayle y. thieman , portland state university
DESCRIPTION
A Struggle for Educational Equality 1950-1980 Abby Levin Amy Newcomb David oh Kimberly Sieveke Lucinda Philipp Richard Presicci Terra Makowski. CI 565 – Dr. Gayle Y. Thieman , Portland State University. Social Context in the 1950’s. Postwar baby boomers are hopeful - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A STRUGGLE FOR EDUCATIONAL EQUALITY1950-1980ABBY LEVINAMY NEWCOMBDAVID OHKIMBERLY SIEVEKELUCINDA PHILIPPRICHARD PRESICCITERRA MAKOWSKI
CI 565 – Dr. Gayle Y. Thieman, Portland State University
Social Context in the 1950’s Postwar baby boomers are
hopeful Schools expected to
inoculate children from disease, protect them from nuclear threat and prepare them for a technological future.
There were, however, severe inequalities. Springfield Public School - 1950
Severe Inequalities in 1950 African Americans
Segregated by Law: 17 States Average Schooling for
Mexican Americans: 5.4 Years Disabled Children Not
Enrolled in School: 72% Women Athletics Teams,
Scholarships and Professional Schools and Colleges were unavailable. Eastport School, Annapolis -
1950
Racial Segregation in Topeka, Kansas Fight Began in Topeka, Kansas High Schools
Integrated on the surface School activities were segregated
Elementary Schools Strictly segregated 18 white schools, 4 African-
American schools African-American Teachers held
Master’s degrees and were highly qualified. They had vastly limited resources compared to white schools.Board of Education in Topeka, Kansas
Beginning the Fight for Equality: Parents and the NAACP
Parents fight for their children School Board meetings
Wanted the same education Separate, but equal court decision
upheld NAACP efforts
School was the platform to end segregation
13 parents attempted to enroll children (1950)
Brown vs. Topeka Board of Education (1954 verdict)
Problems with the Implementation of the Brown vs. Board RulingA Failure to Integrate 10 years after Brown vs
Board of Education ruling, 90% of schools were still segregated.
Example: The Little Rock Nine - 1957
Civil Rights Act of 1964 President Lyndon Johnson The act withheld funding if schools
failed to integrate, and gave funding if schools successfully integrated.
The monetary incentive was enough to make most schools comply
Within 8 years, 91% of schools were integrated
The Bilingual Education Act 1968 - Congress Passes the Bilingual
Act of 1968 1970 - Crystal City, Texas. Chicano
students demand to be allowed to speak Spanish, study Chicano history, and be taught by Chicano teachers.
1974 - Lau sues San Francisco's school district. Lau v Nichols US Supreme Court 1974: Specialized instruction in English; Access to core content; and Access to all other district programs and services
1975 - National Association for Bilingual Education is founded.
Walkout in Crystal City - 1969
School in San Francisco - 1975
Gender Equality In 1970, only 1 % of Medical and Law degrees
were awarded to women and 7.4% of high school athletes were female
In 1972, Title IV was passed. Like the previous civil rights laws, enforcement was still an issue
Dorothy Raffle: 14 year old female basketball player. Filed lawsuit against federal government for failing to enforce the law
Within 20 years, 40% of all high school athletes are female, and over half of higher level graduates are women
Title IX had an impact broader than just K-12 education; it swept to professions, which changed the workplace
Children with Disabilities Civil rights movement
extended to children with disabilities, based heavily on the Brown vs. Board decision
Not enough to treat everyone equally, had to provide resources and training to make learning possible
Changes were costly and controversial
Widely implemented
Busing and Zoning Discrimination Persists 1971: U.S. Supreme Court ruled that busing children
within a city’s limits was lawful and a solution to the school segregation issue.
Detroit, Michigan was not one of those successful cities. In 1972 a federal judge ordered an unconventional solution: Bus inner city students (black) out of Detroit and into the suburban schools (white) and vice versa. This was due to the “white flight” that stemmed from Detroit’s riots of the 1960’s that now had caused severely underfunded inner city schools while the suburbs – due to a rich tax foundation – offered a rich variety of academic and extracurricular activities.
This affected approximately 800,000 students
1974: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the suburbs of Detroit were not responsible for the school conditions in the city.
Thurgood Marshall was outspoken against the ruling: “In the short run, it may seem the easier course “to allow our great metropolitan areas to be divided up into two cities – one white, the other black. But it is a course, I predict that our people ultimately regret.
The Debate Continues
Years later the debate for educational equality continues!
Busing as an example was used successfully to create more racially
balanced schools in many cities But it failed in places like Detroit - the numbers were out of sync to promote
quality education for all
Did the lawsuits and litigation work? Some think the debates and action were needed to address the social injustice in
a democratic society Yet there is a doubt that the best ideas
about common schools and public education have not been tried
So where did we get in 30 years of radical changes?
We sometimes forget where we were in 1954 and some do see a net gain for the
society as a whole.We got the laws in place that can allow
us to move forward and develop a healthy system - but will we?