civil and environmental engineering earth systems...

86
Civil and Environmental Engineering / Earth Systems 109 Green Buildings & Behavior: Creating a Green Student Workforce to Help Implement Stanford’s Sustainability Vision Inaugurated: Winter 2010 STANFORD UNIVERSITY For Internal Use Only—Not for Publication or Distribution July 2010

Upload: vuongkhue

Post on 08-Mar-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • CivilandEnvironmentalEngineering/EarthSystems109

    GreenBuildings&Behavior:CreatingaGreenStudentWorkforcetoHelpImplementStanfordsSustainabilityVisionInaugurated:Winter2010

    STANFORDUNIVERSITY

    ForInternalUseOnlyNotforPublicationorDistribution

    July2010

  • 1

    AcknowledgementsCourseStaffJeffreyKoseff,Faculty,DepartmentofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineeringFahmidaAhmed,OfficeofSustainability,AssociateDirector,SustainabilityandEnergyManagement

    ,StudentsforaSustainableStanford

    oelCrisostomo,TeachingAssistant/OutreachatherineHeflin, Intern

    NK OfficeofSustainability

    ueG

    stLecturers(inalphabeticalorder)

    AnnieShiau,AlumniAssociation,GreenArrillagaPilotDavidFreyberg,Faculty,DepartmentofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineering

    bilityandEnergy FahmidaAhmed,OfficeofSustainability,AssociateDirector,Sustaina

    Management

    g gFranklinOrr,Faculty,DepartmentofEnergyResourcesEngineerin

    GilbertMasters,Faculty,DepartmentofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineerin

    JiffyVermylen,SustainabilityCoordinator,OfficeofSustainabilityJosephStagner,ExecutiveDirector,SustainabilityandEnergyManagement

    ormationTechnology,FacilitiesEnergyJoyceDickerson,DirectorofSustainableInf

    Management,SustainabilityandEnergyManagement

    JulieMuir,StanfordRecyclingCenter,PSSILeeSchipper,Researcher,PrecourtEnergyEfficiencyCenter

    es,LisaKwiatkowski,Manager,outreachandTDM,ParkingandTransportationServicSustainabilityandEnergyManagement

    SustainabilityandEnergyMargaretLaPorte,AssociateDirector,WaterResources,

    Management

    MattRothe,SustainabilityCoordinator,StanfordDining

    PamelaMatson,Dean,SchoolofEarthSciencesScottGould,FacilitiesEnergyManagement,SustainabilityandEnergyManagement

    ment,SustainabilityandEnergySusanKulakowski,Manager,FacilitiesEnergyManage

    ManagementTomFenner,DeputyGeneralCouncil,Green170Pilot

    TomZigterman,AssociateDirector,WaterServices&CivilInfrastructure,SustainabilityandEnergyManagement

    ormoreinformationaboutStanfordUniversityssustainabilityprograms,environmental

    ctivit es,vis t:Fresearch,andstudenta i i

    tOfficeofSustainability sustainable.stanford.eduWoodsInstitutefortheEnvironmen woods.stanford.eduStudentsforaSustainableStanford sustainability.stanford.edu

  • Table of Contents

    I. Course Syllabus4 IV. Final Group Project

    School of Earth Sciences Building Level Sustainability Program...10 Braun Hall11 Mitchell Building..49

    CEE/EARTHSYS 109: Green Buildings & Behavior

  • Green Buildings & Behavior: Creating a Green Student Workforce to Help Implement Stanford's Sustainability Vision

    Civil & Environmental Engineering/Earth Systems 109

    Course Syllabus Course Description: Stanford is a leader in resource management, demonstrated through infrastructure improvements and efficiency programs. Yet, great potential exists to couple them with program-based local actions that promote both resource conservation and an educational environment for sustainability. Local action at a building level directly contribute to conservation, lower utility costs, and generate understanding of sustainability consistent with the Stanfords commitment to sustainability as a core value. This course will offer an overview on operational sustainability including energy, water, buildings, waste, and food systems, as well as practical training to enable a student to become sustainability coordinators for their dorms or departments. Grading: C/NC Units: 2 Repeat or not: Yes If repeated how many units: 0 Time: Monday & Wednesday, 2:15-3:45 PM Location: Building 60, Room 120. Section: No section but TAs will have office hours Leadership: Faculty sponsor: Jeff Koseff (Civil and Environmental Engineering) Staff Sponsor/presenter: Fahmida Ahmed (Office of Sustainability, S&EM) Email list: [email protected] Student Leaders: Katherine Heflin (Office of Sustainability intern), Kevan Christensen (Green Living Council), Noel Crisostomo (Students for Sustainable Stanford) Teaching Assistant: Noel Crisostomo, [email protected] Course Outcome: After successfully completing this course and assignments, students will be able to

    Articulate campus sustainability principles and key operational areas Take direct action of greening departments through individual behaviors Potentially become interns with the Office of Sustainability for advanced research and implementation at Stanford

    CEE/EARTHSYS 109: Green Buildings & Behavior

  • Prerequisites: Class limit: 25 students with an interest in campus sustainability Student Selection: The class space is limited. To qualify:

    Write a 1-page single spaced essay on why you believe campus sustainability is important, including any relevant experience you can bring to the class and any other special qualifications you may have (a lottery will be held if necessary). Please include your year and major in the header. Save it as "Lastname,Firstname.DOC" and send it to [email protected] by Friday, December 11, 2009.

    If you have any questions, please email [email protected].

    At the end of the quarter, the top 10 students, evaluated with the below criteria, will be selected to be Student Sustainability Coordinators, trained by the Office of Sustainability at Stanford. These students will receive a $500 stipend for their work/quarter to implement Sustainable Stanfords Building-Level Sustainability Program over the 10 weeks of Spring quarter. Class Structure: 2 unit class 18 meetings: (2 hour/week lecture, 2 hours/week out of class work/workshop). Teaching Methods: Our class will exercise a variety of tutorial methods. We will have a series of guest speakers share their expertise in related fields as well as take field trips, participate in hands-on demonstrations, group exercises, and even watch relevant films in or outside class. Grading Evaluation: "Pass" is 70% C or better 40% Attendance & participation 20% Quiz on Class Materials 40% Group Project: The School of Earth Sciences Request for Proposals

    In groups of 5, prepare a proposal to decrease the greenhouse gas emissions associated with operations from a building, Mitchell or GeoCorner, within the School of Earth Sciences (SES). Prepare a 15-minute presentation for your client, SES Dean Pam Matson, and other stakeholders including the lecturers and Woods and Precourt Institute Directors, in which your team will pitch interventions using the concepts and skills you have learned in class regarding energy, water, food, waste, and transport. Frame your proposal within the scope of a 10-week implementation period and in consideration of Stanford resources and the evolving California policy climate. Since the class will be learning the same material, the key will be to make innovative yet deployable and cost-effective ideas to eliminate waste and reduce emissions.

    (Optional) Final Individual Interview to become a Student Sustainability Coordinator.

    CEE/EARTHSYS 109: Green Buildings & Behavior

  • Schedule: Jan 4 - March 19, 2010 Readings: Where will be weekend reading for Mondays lecture (technical reading, best practices, popular articles.)

    Class Structure:

    Monday Lectures: Technical info plus motivational content, guest speakers on each topics, discussion on readings.

    DUE: Weekly quizzes on the prior weeks material.

    Wednesday Workshops/ Practicum: Practical training, learn by doing, hands-on oriented, may include field trips.

    Week TOPIC

    Date Subjects Speakers

    Week 1 SUSTAINABLE

    STANFORD

    Jan 4

    Course Overview Expectations, Final project, Class introductions,

    Office of Sustainability

    Jeff Koseff, Fahmida Ahmed

    Jan 6 Climate Change & Stanford Emissions Inventory, Campus work on Energy & climate plan Joe Stagner, Lynn Orr

    Week 2 ENERGY

    Jan 11

    Energy Efficiency and Demand Side Management in Buildings

    Gil Masters, Susan Kulakowski, Joyce Dickerson

    Jan 13 Energy Audits/Action Noel Crisostomo, Katherine Heflin

    Week 3

    Jan 18 No Class

    Jan 20 Green Building Standards at

    Stanford; Y2E2 Docent Program Jeff Koseff, Fahmida Ahmed

    Week 4 WATER

    Jan 25 Water Resources and Smart Conservation David Freyberg, Marty Laporte, Tom Zigterman

    Jan 27 Water Audits/Action Noel Crisostomo

    Week 5 WASTE

    Feb 1

    Towards Zero Waste, Procurement

    Julie Muir

    Feb 3 Waste Audits/Action Julie Muir

    CEE/EARTHSYS 109: Green Buildings & Behavior

  • Week 6 FOOD Feb 8 Sustainable Food Systems Matt Rothe

    Feb 10 Stanford Dining Audits/Action Matt Rothe

    Week 7 Feb 15 No Class

    Feb 17 Group Project Overview:

    Proposals for the School of Earth Sciences

    Pam Matson, Fahmida Ahmed

    Week 8 TRANSPORTATION

    Feb 22

    Sustainable Transportation Brodie Hamilton, Lee Schipper

    BEHAVIOR Feb 24 Navigating Stanford

    Stakeholders & Influencing Behavior

    Fahmida Ahmed, Tom Fenner, Matt Williams, Joyce Dickerson

    Week 9 TRAINING

    March 1

    Sustainability Coordinator Training (1): Department Audits

    Checklists Fahmida Ahmed, Noel Crisostomo

    March 3 Sustainability Coordinator Training (2): Preparation to pilot Fahmida Ahmed, Noel Crisostomo

    Week 10 IMPLEMENTATION March 8 Group Project Presentations Guest Lecturers Invited

    March 10 Wrap up, Evaluations,

    Individual interviews for candidate Sustainability

    CoordinatorsTBD

    CEE/EARTHSYS 109: Green Buildings & Behavior

  • Readings:

    Week 1: Sustainable Stanford and Climate Change A Student's Guide to Sustainable Living At Stanford. http://sustainable/sites/sem.stanford.edu/files/documents/Stanford_students_guide_sustainable_living; Sustainable Choices. Stanford University School of Earth Sciences-Earth Systems Program. http://sustainablechoices.stanford.edu/ Stanford University- The College Sustainability Report Card. Sustainable Endowments Institute, 2009. http://www.greenreportcard.org/ http://www.greenreportcard.org/files/Stanford_Surveys.pdf Energy and Climate Plan. Stanford University Sustainability and Energy Management, October 2009. http://sustainable.stanford.edu/sites/sem.stanford.edu/files/documents/Stanford_EC_factsheet_2009.pdf http://sustainable.stanford.edu/sites/sem.stanford.edu/files/documents/Stanford_FAQ_factsheet_2009.pdf Sustainable Stanford, Stanford University Sustainability and Energy Management. http://sustainable.stanford.edu Stanford University Woods Institute for the Environment http://woods.stanford.edu Weeks 2 and 3: Energy Flex Your Power. http://www.fypower.org/ Best Practices for Commercial Office. http://www.fypower.org/bpg/index.html?b=offices Energy Star for Higher Education. http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=bygtw.showSplash http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=higher_ed.bus_highereducation Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan. California Public Utilities Commission. 2009. http://www.californiaenergyefficiency.com/index.shtml http://www.californiaenergyefficiency.com/docs/EEStrategicPlan.pdf Yang and Yamazaki Environment and Energy Building. http://woods.stanford.edu/docs/news/Y2E2-Award.pdf Week 4: Water 2008 Annual Water Quality Report. Stanford University Utilities Division. Pages 1-8. http://lbre.stanford.edu/sem/sites/all/lbre-shared/files/docs_public/2008CCR.pdf California's Water Conservation Resource. Association of California Water Agencies. 2009. http://www.saveourh2o.org http://www.saveourh2o.org/index.cfm/what-you-can-do/ 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan (Draft). California State Water Resources Control Board. April 2009. http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/hot_topics/20x2020/docs/comment043009/202020_final_report_draft.pdf Executive Summary pgs ix-xii, 2. Establishing a Baseline & Targets pgs 11-25, 4. Implementation pgs 43-46.

    CEE/EARTHSYS 109: Green Buildings & Behavior

  • CEE/EARTHSYS 109: Green Buildings & Behavior

    Week 5: Zero Waste Peninsula Sanitary Services Inc./Stanford Recycling Center. http://recycling.stanford.edu/pssi/index.html The Story of Stuff. http://www.storyofstuff.com/ IG Mason, AK Brooking, A Oberender, JM. Implementation of a Zero Waste Program at a University Campus. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2003 - 202.29.21.6 Week 6 and 7: Food Systems Stanford Dining. Sustainable Food System. http://www.stanford.edu/dept/rde/dining/food_sys.htm 2005 San Francisco Collaborative Food System Assessment. San Francisco Food Systems. http://www.sffoodsystems.org/pdf/FSA-online.pdf Executive Summary, Introduction Pages vii-4 Hoekstra, Arjen Y. "The Water Footprint of Food." Water For Food. 2008. Pages 49-61 http://www.waterfootprint.org/Reports/Hoekstra-2008-WaterfootprintFood.pdf Week 8: Transportation Toor, W. "The Road Less Traveled: Sustainable Transportation for Campuses." Planning for Higher Education. Vol 31, No 3. Mar-May 2003, pgs 131-141 Hamilton, B. "The Transportation Demand Management Experience at Stanford University." TDM Review. Issue 2. 2008, pgs 16-21 http://transportation.stanford.edu/pdf/TDM_2_2008.pdf Stanford University Parking and Transportation Services. Program Summary. http://transportation.stanford.edu/pdf/program-summary-2009.pdf Goldman, T. and R. Gorham. "Sustainable Urban Transport: Four Innovative Directions." Technology in Society. Vol 28. 2006. Pages 261-273. "Bike-frastructure 101." http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/010404.html Influencing Behavior McKensie-Mohr, D. Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. http://www.cbsm.com/pages/guide/preface Introduction (Pages 2-7); Tools: Commitment (Pages 18-25); Tools: Prompts (Pages 26-30); Tools: Norms (Pages 32-37); Tools: Communication (Pages 38-49) The Fun Theory. http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/10/worlds-deepest-trash-bins-behavior-changing-inventions.php Week 9: Promoting Behavior Change, Training as a Building Coordinator Building Level Sustainability Program. Office of Sustainability, Department of Sustainability and Energy Management. Stanford University. 2010.

  • CEE/EARTHSYS 109: Green Buildings & Behavior

    CEE/EARTHSYS 109: Green Buildings and Behavior

    Final Group Project

    School of Earth Sciences Building Sustainability Program

    In groups of 3, prepare a proposal to decrease the greenhouse gas emissions associated with operations from either Mitchell or Braun "GeoCorner," two buildings managed by the School of Earth Sciences (SES). Note: only two groups per building. Prepare a 15-minute presentation for your client, SES Dean Pam Matson, and other stakeholders including the staff lecturers and Woods and Precourt Institute Directors, in which your team will propose interventions using the concepts and skills you have learned through the Building-Level Sustainability Program (BLSP) regarding energy, water, food, waste, and transportation. Write an Executive Summary to accompany your presentation. Frame your implementation within the scope of Spring Quarter. Be sure to consider how you will leverage Stanford's infrastructural resources with the Department of Sustainability & Energy Management, and the evolving California policy context regarding sustainability. Since the class will be learning the same BLSP material, the key will be to make innovative, yet deployable and cost effective ideas to eliminate waste and reduce emissions. We will be completing a walk through of Mitchell and Geocorner on March 1 and 3 guided by Tom Koos, but feel free to explore the buildings beforehand with the BLSP materials. Presentations and Executive Summaries are due to be submitted as a file upload to this assignment by March 8 by each group member. Groups will present on March 8 and should allow for 5 minutes of Q&A in addition to their 15-minute presentation. Total Points: 240 140= Proposal Executive Summary (4 pages, 1.5x-spaced with bullets and tables as needed, saved as .pdf) Score based on: 50) The incorporation of course materials: readings, BLSP audit materials, and lectures 50) Quantitative and qualitative descriptions of conservation measures 30) Inclusion of barriers to sustainable practices and means of overcoming them 10) Formatting, for example: Problem statement and goals, Baseline estimates, Conservation measures, Implementation, Cost and Energy impacts, Conclusions. 100= Powerpoint Presentation (saved as .pdf) Score based on: Adequate utilization of resources, graphics/visuals, clarity/format, creativity, teamwork

  • ENERGY AUDIT: BRAUN HALL !MiMicah

    By Michael Rafanan, Frances Ellerbe, and Eli Pollak

  • RECOMMENDATIONS

  • INSTALL TIMERS

    !Printers !Copiers !Water heaters

  • INSTALL MOTION CONTROLLED LIGHTING

    !Areas such as: ! Attic crawl space ! Phone booths ! Student Offices ! All Common Areas

  • ENCOURAGE NATURAL LIGHTING

  • REMOVAL OF EXCESS APPLIANCES

    !Remove if they meet the following criteria: ! Completely unused. ! Another similar appliance within 25 second walking

    distance.

  • IMPROVE REMINDER SIGNS

    !Add signs to remind occupants to turn off lights ! Already signs to lock doors in place in common areas ! Make signs for spaces that are used for short periods

    of time (i.e kitchenette)

  • CONSOLIDATION OF OFFICE EQUIPMENT

    !These include: ! Automatic Staplers ! Paper Shredders ! Label Makers

  • ANOTHER EFFORT TO USE SMARTSTRIPS

    !Target smaller group of people. (i.e administrative offices) ! Educate and train staff for proper use.

  • FUTURE IN-DEPTH PROJECTS

    !Audit printer locations and use. ! Consolidate amount of printers and also improve

    placements.

    !Bigfix installed on all computers. ! Require computers to automatically shut off.

    !Replace all incandescents with CFL bulbs !Replace old equipment

  • SO WHAT IMPACT COULD THESE RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE?

  • !First we took measurements using a KillAwatt for the major appliances in Geocorner

  • !We then counted or estimated the total number of these devices in the building

  • !Possible Savings calculated for 10 hours off every day, or removal of some appliances

  • ECONOMICS

    !Savings of 99.6 kWh/day

    ! (99.6 kWh/day) / (766 kWh/day) = 13% energy consumption reduction

    ! (99.6 kWh/day) * ($0.1154 /kWh) = $11.49/day

    ! $11.49 /day * 365 days = $4,194 annually

  • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TIMERS

    Capital Cost for 1 Timer; $9.09

  • TIMERS ON PRINTERS

    ! 23 Printer each drawing 7 W ! Install timers to turn off printers for 10 hours

    9pm-7am !Saves (23 printers)(7 W)(10 hours)*(1 kW/1000W)

    =1.61 kWh/day which at a price of $0.1154/kWh means a savings of $0.185/day and$67.52/year

    !Capital Cost of 23 timers=$209.07 !At at 7% discount rate and 20 year time horizon

    this means a NPV of $506.24! !Simple payback period of just over 3 years !Building users will probably not even notice!

  • TIMER ON WATER COOLER

    !Used Kill-a-Watt to determine that water cooler outside the Undergraduate Lounge draws 580W

    ! Install a timer to turn of for four hours between midnight and 4am

    !Capital Cost of $9.09 !Savings of 2.32 kWh/day and 846.8 kWh/year !Cost savings of $97.72/year !Using same assumptions this is a NPV of

    $1,026.16 and a simple payback of just over one month

    !You could also remove the cooler entirely!

  • SustainableWater,Waste,andTransporta3onGeocorner

    JacobSchaffert,PabloLopez,AkwasiAbrefah

  • Domes3cWater

  • Model(audit)

    Es3mates(aGermeasuringthefixturesandnumberandadjus3ngittobuildingparameters)257gallon/dayspermonthwithapossiblesavingsofabout30gallons/day

    Savingsaremostlikelyfromthenonregulatedfaucetonthethirdfloorkitchenareasink.

  • 0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    March April May June July August September October November December January February Model

    Gallons

    20092010

    MonthlyConsump5on

  • PeopleatBraun

    Buildingdemographics:howmanypeople,groups/departments

    Braunhasonly1dept.total:GES 9faculty 9staff 32students 4visitor Studentses3matedtobemostlygoneJuly,August,September,andDecember

  • 0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    March April May June July August September October November December January February Model

    Gallons/dayperson

    20092010

    Gallons/daypeople

  • Sugges3onsforimprovement

    Buyanaeratorforthesinkonthethirdfloor Es3matedcost:$10(conserva3vees3mate) Es3matedSavings(conserva3ve)10gallonsday,310gallonsamonth

    Costofwater$6.54/1000gallons Payback3me5months

  • Waste

  • Recycling

    AwarenesshighEWasteContainersinhallway

    Copyroomsorganizedwell30%recyclecontentBaeerycharger

    OutsideArea

  • RecyclingCon3nued

    StudentuseofrecyclingprimaryconcernResidentsunderstandStudentlounge&classroomsisolatedcans

    Informa3on/signage

  • FoodRelatedWaste

    Utensils/cupsDifferencebetweenresidents/students Jugsofwatervs.tap?

    WasteAuditResultsHanddryerCompostop3on?

  • Transporta3on

    Informa3ondistribu3on Alterna3veTransport Bicycles

    SecuritySafety

  • RoomforImprovement

    Drivingpersonalvehiclestowork Peoplebringingbikesintothebuilding Lackofbikesafety Agreatervarietyofbikesinthefleet Gasguzzlingfieldtripvehicles NodepartmentZipcaraccount Eventplanningcomplica3ons

  • Solu3onshiddenbikecage

  • Encouragingvisualreminders&departmenthelmets

    Purchasinghelmetsforthefacultyandstaffinthedepartment

    Postersincommonareastoportrayadesirednorm

  • Lookatreplacingfieldtripvehiclesandren3ngabus/40personshuelesinstead

    GetadepartmentZipcaraccount!

  • MoreSolu3ons!

    Ini3ateaZimridesurvey Moreinforma3onabouteventplanningtoavoidpeakhours

    Usestudents!someoneisusuallysellingabike

  • Mitchell Sustainability

    Alex Luisi, Graham Provost, Nick Riva, Allison Stafford, Nicole Gaetjens, Nicole Greenspan

  • Overview of Building

    Mitchell has... 7 storiesSeveral labsPrecious gems (and security issues that surround them)A two-floor Library that has the most windows in the buildingStairs that are not truly easy to use139 regular occupants (faculty, students, staff)6 dedicated students to help it become more efficient and sustainable

  • Roadmap

    LightingPlugload - AppliancesPlugload - Desktop ComputingDomestic WaterWaste & RecyclingFood & CompostA few more recommendations...Conclusions

  • Mitchell Lighting, Windows, Motion Detectors, and

    Efficiency

    Alex Luisi

  • Current use of Mitchell The library currently has the most natural lighting, is best-lit and has balconies Most offices have inadequate natural lightingThe hallways are lit only by ceiling lightsThe question is, is this the most efficient use of lighting and the building space? How can we improve it?

  • Lighting & Space Efficiency

  • The motion sensors and lights already have an implementation plan underway

    Useful to divide building into sections for lighting when installing the motion sensor?

    Rooms can benefit by having two light switches, each one controlling half the lights (i.e. every other light Each floor would have someone to ensure that all sustainability guidelines are being followed

    Deep Dive: Motion Sensors, Artificial Lights, Sustainability Coordinator

  • Deep Dive: Natural Lighting & Windows There is very little natural lighting in the office space of the building, as well as a lack of cross-ventilation

    You can make it so that windows in the offices can be openedThe building does have huge, beautiful windows, but they are in the library However, there is the possibility of moving the library and converting that space to office space

    Open-floor plan, private offices, more office spce Balconies and windows The books can be moved up to the 3rd and 4th floors There would be issues with tracking who comes in and out of the library that way

  • Issues with these ideas?

    First, the easy one:Money

    These will be expensive renovations, but in the long run, I believe that the investment will pay itself off in the health of the occupants, fewer lights used, and a more efficient usage of space

    Second, the other easy one:People will not want to change where they are, possibly because of their proximity to their labs, or just a general dislike of moving

    However, I believe that if these are discussed properly and incorporate people's feedback, this would be a hugely successful program

  • Plugloads:Appliances

    Graham Provost

  • Plugloads - Appliances

    Copy Machines & Printers

    Refrigerators

    Peripherals and Misc.

  • Copy Machines & PrintersMost of the printers and copy machines in Mitchell have power save modes.

    The Xerox Phaser 8560 (a common printer in Mitchell) can switch to power save mode after 30 - 240 minutes of inactivity.

    Most of the printers appear to be set in 240 min mode.

    Switching half of the printers in Mitchell from 240 minute mode to 30 minute mode would save 17,000 kWh and almost $2000.

    If occupants are resistant, similar result could be achieved using timers.

  • Refrigerators

    Existing refrigerators are relatively inefficient. Replacing each refrigerator with energy star refrigerator would save 756 kWh per yearCould pay for themselves in less than six years

  • Peripherals and Miscellaneous

    Most printers in Mitchell are not peripherals Smart strips and timers should be used in a targeted mannerThis can make deployment more difficult

  • Plugloads:Desktop Computing

    Nick Riva

  • Plugloads- Desktop ComputingCurrent Situation: 120 Office Occupants Each provided with Desktop & LCD Monitor

    Often left on at night for remote access

    Minimal peripherals (Speakers, Sub-woofer, etc.)

  • Desktop Computing: Energy Use

    Daily Energy Use 84 kWhrMonthly Energy Use 2,516 kWhr

    Monthly Cost $290 Only 2% of Total Building Energy Use/Cost

  • Desktop Computing: Improvements

    Savings may be marginal, but part of a larger program and behavior shift

    Encourage BigFix- Reduce Active hours

    Adopt Cloud computing- Remote access

    Install Smart Strips- Ensure all monitors off at night Larger Investment: Laptops for Occupants

  • Desktop Computing: Savings

    Estimated Savings from BigFix, Cloud & Smart Strips:

    26% Energy or $69/month

    Minimal Expense & Disruption

    Estimated Savings of Laptop Use

    88% Energy or $237/month

    Cost may prohibitively high

  • Domestic WaterConsumption

    Allison Stafford

  • Faucets

    10 bathroom, 4 kitchen faucetsCurrent aerators: 1-1.5 gal/minRecommended: 0.5 gal/min aeratorsPotential Savings

    122 gal/day15% of occupancy-based consumption9% of total consumption $455/year

  • Faucets

    Eligible for free hardware or

    rebates from Santa Clara Valley

    Water District

  • Toilets and Urinals

    15 toiletscurrent usage: 1.6 gpfrecommended usage: 1.28 gpf

    5 urinalscurrent usage: 1 gpfrecommended usage: .125 gpf

    potential savings214 gal/day27% of occupancy-based consumption16% of total consumption $870/year

  • Bottled Water Use vs. Filtration

    Slight increase in domestic water consumptionEnergy use reductionNo preference from occupants

  • Expected Results

    Laboratory water use is relatively fixedAerator savings: 122 gal/day, $455/year (9%)Toilet and urinal savings: 214 gal/day,$870/year (16%)Total Savings

    336 gal/day, 122,640 gal/year $1,364 /year 25% of total water use

    Reduced energy consumption58% less hot water usedfiltered tap water requires less chilling

  • Waste & Recycling

    Nicole Gaetjens

  • Reduce/ReuseBased on data from Arrillaga pilot....Average 10,500 sheets/person/yr x 139 people x $2.40/500 sheets* = $7,000/yr --> Shift to paperless memo-ing! --> More draft printing

    *Stanford Procurement Office

  • Reduce/ReuseAverage 150 compostable cups/person/yr x 139 people x $15/150 cups*= $2,085/yr --> Buying 75 $1 Ikea mugs eliminates cup cost! --> Don't forget other foodware! (plates, utensils...)

    *Cheap estimate from online prices, assuming Stanford gets better deal

  • Recycle Approximate waste from Mitchell: 4.5 lbs trash/person/day* x 139 people x ton/2000lbs x 365 days/yr = 114 tons trash/yr Stanford University's Average Trash Composition by Weight**:-7% Bottles and Cans (8 tons/yr)-15% Paper (17 tons/yr)

    Savings From Recycling**:mixed paper and cardboard: +$120/ton -> +$2040/yrbottles and cans: +$900/ton -> +$7,200/yrlandfill: -$46/ton -> -$1150/yr"salvage revenue" = $10,390/yr

    Departments dont pay for garbage directly...BUT "salvage revenue" goes directly to pay for solid waste services including recycling and composting collection.** *http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/municipal/msw99.htm **Julie Muir, head of PSSI

  • A far off dream...?

    BUT... - about $6/container-Currently, Departments/individuals must buy themselves

    Maybe...-find cheaper/unused containers-convince PSSI of demand

    Individual recycling bins for each cubicle!-->implemented in Student Housing-->adds convenience

  • Food & Compost

    Nicole Greenspan

  • Food & Compost - Events"Green Event Planning Guidelines"

    Promotion/Presentation - 'Green' event!recycled paper, e-invites reusables, recycled mat, sustainable

    Food/Drink - sustainable purchasingsustainable, seasonal, local, organic, free-range, fair trade, humane, directtasty vegetarian > meathealthy - fruit, vegees, cheese, bread

    Disposables! - service-ware"buffet" style, buy/serve in bulksmaller plates - less food waste!reusable, recyclable, compostable

    Zero Waste!recycling, compost bins @ trash binsclear signage!!/trained staffsurplus - donate SPOON/shelters http://www.stanford.

    edu/~knudson/ASSU/greenevents.pdf

  • Food & Compost - Kitchenettes/OfficesPurchasing:

    Encourage similar purchasing to "Green Events"local, organic, humane, fair, direct, vegetarian

    Fair Trade Coffee, "healthy" options for snacksReusable/Recyclable/Compostable serviceware

    Waste: Organics still make up 30% of the University average trash composition by weight!!

    Compost bin in EVERY kitchenette (4) clearly labeled, dif colorswho will take it out? Sustainability "leader"

    CBSM - Behavior Change Tools (address barriers)Prompts/Effective Communication - SignageConvenience - compost bins in offices? ($5)Clear guidelines/alternatives - events & lifeIncentives - pride, social norm, commitments

  • A few more recommendations...Transportation...

    bike/carpool program - online network?Purchasing...

    paper - 100% recycled content - same with TPenergy star appliances

    Behaviormake things more CONVENIENT - break barriers - actual and perceivedsignage - visuals!, simple info/tips/goalsrefund for reduction - incentive program

    More general awareness of available programs on campus... newsletter?

    Better insulation (last time a renovation was done, they found socks as the insulation)Use more efficient fans to blow heat lownward in large, open areas during the winter

  • ConclusionsSome things are fundamental design mistakes...

    No single staircaseNo windows on 4th and 3rd floorsVery few windows can be opened

    But some can be fixed!

    Easily :)more efficient lighting, appliances, computingmore sustainable purchasing, reduce waste!better recycling/composting programssimple behavior changes - save water, energy

    Not quite as easily... Switch Library and 4th floor offices

    natural lighting, balcony - open windowsLab energy needs...

  • Thank you Fahmida, Noel, Katherine!!(and all the presenters!)

    Questions?

  • CivilandEnvironmentalEngineering/EarthSystems109

    GreenBuildings&Behavior:CreatingaGreenStudentWorkforcetoHelpImplementStanfordsSustainabilityVision

    S T A N F O R D U N I V E R S I T Y

    CEE ES 109 coverCEE109-4 Project.pdfGreen Buildings and BehaviorAcknowledgementsTable of ContentsSyllabusSchool of Earth Sciences BLSPBraun HallMitchell Building