civil rights: equality an american dilemma: promotion of equality conflicts with demands for...

Download Civil Rights: Equality An American Dilemma: Promotion of equality conflicts with demands for freedom…

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: martina-sherman

Post on 26-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • Civil Rights: Equality An American Dilemma: Promotion of equality conflicts with demands for freedom
  • Slide 2
  • Definition Policies to protect people against discrimination by government Three types of discrimination: Race Gender Other
  • Slide 3
  • Concept of Equality Does NOT appear in the entire Const, not even in BoR Only place = 14 th At equal protection of the law guaranteed to all citizens Initially meant only life, liberty & property but has expanded
  • Slide 4
  • Tests Used to Decide Discrimination Cases 1. Rational basis test (most lenient) Used to decide age/ $ cases A law is constal IF there is a reasonable relationship b/the purpose of the law & a legitimate govt objective (health, safety, etc) Burden of proof on the individual who challenges the law Ex. airline pilots over 61 not ok safety Ex. 18 year olds drinking, not okalcohol accidents
  • Slide 5
  • 2. Intermediate scrutiny test (used w/gender cases) State must prove a relationship b/law & objective
  • Slide 6
  • 3. Strict scrutiny test (used w/race cases) State must prove compelling reasons for enacting a law (ex. natl security, to remedy past discrimination) State must have used least restrictive means
  • Slide 7
  • History of Race Cases Slavery to 1865 Scott v. Sandford (1857): black men, free or slave = chattel, no rights as citizens AND Congress has no power to ban slavery 13 th Amendment (1865) abolished slavery
  • Slide 8
  • 14 th Amendment All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge [deprive] the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
  • Slide 9
  • Citizenship by Birth Jus soli- law of the soil Grants citizenship to nearly all people born in US or Am territories Jus sanguinis- law of blood If an individual is born in a foreign country and both parents are US citizens, the child is a citizen if at least one parent is a legal resident of the US If only one parent is an American citizen, the parent must have lived in the US for at least 5 years, 2 of which had to occur after the age of 14
  • Slide 10
  • Reconstruction & Resegregation occupation, state legislatures had to ratify new amendments; no former Confederates could hold office Jim Crow laws returned w/Home Rule de jure & de facto segregation Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) established separate but equal (RR transportation)
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Retired professor George McLaurins shameful accommodation outside of the classroom when a federal district court ordered his admission into the University of Oklahomas doctoral program.
  • Slide 13
  • Era of Civil Rights Sweatt v. Painter (1950) Separate MUST be truly equal Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Unanimously ended segregation as violation of 14 th Amendment Equal Protection Clause Led to bussing; Rosa Parks 1955, MLK, marches, non- violence, sit-ins
  • Slide 14
  • Era of Civil Rights Hernandez v. Texas (1953) the Fourteenth Amendment protects those beyond the two classes of white or Negro Hispanics cannot be barred from juries
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • Civil Rights Act of 1964 Racial discrimination illegal in places of public accommodation (hotels, restaurants, etc b/c commerce clause!) Forbade discrimination on basis of race, color, natl origin, religion or gender Created EEOC to monitor and enforce protection against job discrimination Withheld federal grants from st/loc govts who practiced discrimination Strengthened voting rights
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • The right to vote Suffrage was denied in a variety of ways Grandfather clauses Poll taxes Literacy tests White primaries Violence and intimidation
  • Slide 20
  • Voting Rights Act of 1965 Although 15 th Amendment in 1870 guaranteed African-Americans the right to vote, South used many methods to restrict voting Act prohibited any govt from using any procedure denying the right to vote on the basis of race or color
  • Slide 21
  • Other Minority Groups Native Americans became citizens in 1924; tribal self-rule recognized Hispanic-Americans = largest minority; MALDEF modeled on NAACP Asian-Americans = fastest-growing minority Korematsu v. US (1944): Su Ct upheld need to protect against espionage > Freds rights
  • Slide 22
  • Slide 23
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Womens Rights Part of abolitionist movement; little other agreement Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments & Resolutions in 1848 Fought coverture which said married womens identity was her husbands no signing of contracts or owning property, or right to vote
  • Slide 26
  • 19 th Amendment in 1920 gave women right to vote Time of protectionist laws Hours, overtime, physical nature or work also kept men from competing w/women for jobs Reed v. Reed (1971) First Su Ct ruling on gender discrimination Must be rational!
  • Slide 27
  • Women in the Workplace EEOC protects women (not just race) Title IX of Education Act of 1972 forbade gender discrimination in federally-subsidized education, including athletics Pregnancy now covered in sick leave & health benefits Military: no draft for women, no ground combat US v. Virginia (1996) State-funded military colleges (VMI, in this case) must admit women (not separate but =!!)
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Slide 30
  • Sexual Harassment In 1986, Su Ct ruled that a hostile or abusive work environment = discrimination forbidden by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 In 1988, ruled that employers are responsible for preventing/eliminating harassment at work, even if management doesnt know about it!
  • Slide 31
  • Other Groups Age discrimination Disabled (today, wheelchair ramps, toilet grab bars, Braille signs) Americans w/Disabilities Act 1990 required employers to make reasonable accommodations and prevents discrimination Ex. Casey Martin v. PGA, Lane v. Tennessee (2004) (access to courts)
  • Slide 32
  • Definition of Disabled?? AIDS?? Yes Epilepsy, high blood pressure, eyesight?? Not if it can be addressed w/medication or tools Biggest concern = $ needed to accommodate
  • Slide 33
  • Gays & Lesbians Not much public support to extend protections to them, but changing Support for civil unions but not marriage Clintons dont ask, dont tell policy in military 1993; must promise celibacy if come out Congress just repealed Dont Ask Dont Tell in 2010
  • Slide 34
  • Romer v. Evans (1996) Su Ct voided a state amendment voted on by the population that denied protection to homosexuals Boy Scouts v. Dale (2000) Could NOT allow gay troop leaders b/c private organization, inconsistent w/ their values
  • Slide 35
  • Lawrence and Gardner v. Texas (2003) 6-3; Texas anti-sodomy law = violation of 14 th Amendment Due Process & Equal Protection Clause BUT doesnt guarantee right to same- sex marriage
  • Slide 36
  • Current Controversy 1996 Federal Defense of Marriage Act Lets states refuse to recognize other states same-sex marriages State laws preventing gays/lesbians from adopting children
  • Slide 37
  • Affirmative Action Definition Special attention or compensatory treatment to members of previously disadvantaged groups Goal Equal results NOT just equal opportunity Typical means = quotas Freedom is not enough. You do not wipe away the scars of centuries. You do not take a man who for years has been hobbled by chains, liberate him, bring him to the starting line of a race saying, 'You are free to compete with all the others', and still justly believe you have been completely fair. Thus it is not enough to open the gates of opportunity. --LBJ
  • Slide 38
  • Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978) Race can be a factor in admissions, but not the factor No quotas Adarand Constructors v. Pena (1995) Fed programs that classify people by race, even for benign purposes, should be presumed to be unconstal
  • Slide 39
  • Gratz v. Bollinger (undergrad student won), Grutter v. Bollinger (grad student lost) (2003) Univ of Michigan law school Yes to affirmative action No to point system!
  • Slide 40
  • Slide 41
  • Do the following situations violate the 14 th Amendments Equal Protection Clause? 1.Due to the fact that most fast-food restaurants are robbed during closing hours, Koubas Coney Dogs has a policy that does not allow women to be hired to work the late closing shift. 2.A maximum-security prison in the state of Texas does not allow female prison guards in its employ. 3.In an effort to reduce crime, a community passes a curfew law that requires all persons under the age of 17 off the streets M-F between 10 pm and 5 am. 4.Ambulance service charges individual passengers $75 for transportation to any local hospital. However, if a passenger weighs over 300 pounds, a $25 fee is added on. 5.Koubas Kool House of Coffee requires that all male patrons wear a sport coat and tie. 6.The state of Texas requires all public employees to be citizens of the United States. 7.A university, in an effort to promote diversity on its college campus, considers race and ethnicity when admitting students.