class 23 bankruptcy, spring, 2009 chrysler sale order randal c. picker leffmann professor of...

24
Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/[email protected] Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker. All

Upload: robyn-adams

Post on 11-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Class 23Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009

Chrysler Sale OrderRandal C. PickerLeffmann Professor of Commercial Law

The Law School

The University of Chicago

773.702.0864/[email protected] © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker. All Rights Reserved.

Page 2: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 2

363

Use, sale, or lease of property (b)(1) The trustee, after notice and a

hearing, may use, sell, or lease, other than in the ordinary course of business, property of the estate … .

Page 3: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 3

363 (cont.)

Use, sale, or lease of property (f) The trustee may sell property under

subsection (b) or (c) of this section free and clear of any interest in such property of an entity other than the estate, only if -

(1) applicable nonbankruptcy law permits sale of such property free and clear of such interest;

(2) such entity consents;

Page 4: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 4

363 (cont.)

(3) such interest is a lien and the price at which such property is to be sold is greater than the aggregate value of all liens on such property;

(4) such interest is in bona fide dispute; or (5) such entity could be compelled, in a legal

or equitable proceeding, to accept a money satisfaction of such interest.

Page 5: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 5

Assumption

Meaning Estate has choice about whether to perform

debtor’s prepetition contract Assumption means estate accepts

obligation to perform under contract

Page 6: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 6

Mechanics

To assume a contract (365(b)) Trustee must cure—fix—most prepetition

defaults; Compensate for actual pecuniary losses

from the default; and Provide adequate assurance of future

performance

Page 7: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 7

365: Rejection

Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) (g) Except as provided in subsections (h)(2) and (i)

(2) of this section, the rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor constitutes a breach of such contract or lease -

(1) if such contract or lease has not been assumed under this section or under a plan confirmed under chapter 9, 11, 12, or 13 of this title, immediately before the date of the filing of the petition; or

Page 8: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005 Randal C. Picker 8

Chrysler Sale Order

Page 9: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005 Randal C. Picker 9

19(e): UAW Contract Assumption

“(e) UAW and GMAC Agreements. Contingent upon the approval of the sale of the Purchased Assets to the Purchaser and concurrently with the consummation of the sale of the Purchased Assets (without prejudice to the conditions thereto set forth in the Purchase Agreement), (i) each of the UAW CBA Assignment and the GMAC MAFA Documents (as such term is defined in the Bidding Procedures attached hereto as Exhibit A) shall be deemed to be Confirmed Agreements as to which no Assignment Notice or Confirmation Notice shall be sent,”

Page 10: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005 Randal C. Picker 10

19(e): UAW Contract Assumption

“(ii) the Debtors shall assign to Purchaser, and Purchaser shall be deemed to have assumed, each such agreement as of the Closing Date, and each non-Debtor party to each such agreement shall be deemed to have consented to such assumption and assignment and (iii) the Court order approving such sale shall reflect such assumption and assignment.”

Page 11: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005 Randal C. Picker 11

19(f): Dealers

“(f) Direct Dealer Agreements. Certain executory dealer agreements will be identified as Designated Agreements to be assumed and assigned. Although most U.S. dealers have entered into standard uniform dealership agreements in the form of the Chrysler Corporation Sales and Service Agreement (the “Sales and Service Agreement"), some dealers are party to older agreements in the form of the Chrysler Direct Dealer Agreement (each, a “Direct Dealer Agreement”),”

Page 12: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005 Randal C. Picker 12

19(f): Dealers

“If a Direct Dealer Agreement is identified as a Designated Agreement pursuant to the procedures above, then such Direct Dealer Agreement will only be assumed and assigned to the Purchaser if the counterparty to the Direct Dealer Agreement first agrees to modify such Direct Dealer Agreement and restate it in the form of the Sales and Service Agreement (each such modified Direct Dealer Agreement and Sales and Service Agreement, a “Dealer Agreement”).”

Page 13: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005 Randal C. Picker 13

19(f): Dealers

“If the counterparty and the Debtors do not so modify and restate such Direct Dealer Agreement in the form of the Sales and Service Agreement, then notwithstanding any other provisions of these Contract Procedures, such Direct Dealer Agreement will not be assumed and assigned pursuant to these Contract Procedures.”

Page 14: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005 Randal C. Picker 14

Screen Capture Slide

Page 15: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 15

Understanding the Sale Order: Starting Points

Hypo 1

Cash $120 U1: $100U2: $100U3: $100

Debtor

How should we divide the assets?

Page 16: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 16

USO: Sale Instead

Hypo 2

Asset $120 U1: $100U2: $100U3: $100

Debtor

Does anything change if we have an asset instead of cash and the asset is sold to a third party first?

Page 17: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 17

USO: Sale w/Assumption

Hypo 3

Asset $120 U1: $100U2: $100U3: $100

Debtor

Suppose that we require the buyer to assume U3’s debt: what happens?

Page 18: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 18

USO: Executory Contract

Hypo 4

Cash $120 U1: $100U2: $100U3: $100

Debtor

D has Exec K: Will need to spend $40 to create $70: what happens?

Exec K

Page 19: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 19

USO: Executory Contract

Hypo 5

Cash $120 U1: $100U2: $100U3: $100

Debtor

D has Exec K: Will need to spend $70 to create $40: what happens?

Exec K

Page 20: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 20

USO: Absolute Priority?

Hypo 6

Asset $120 Senior: $200U1: $100U2: $100U3: $100

Debtor

Senior wants to claim asset and assume debt of U3: what happens?

Page 21: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 21

USO: Voluntary Assumption By Buyer

Hypo 5

Asset $120 U1: $100U2: $100U3: $100

Debtor

Buyer pays $120 and voluntarily assumes U3 debt: what happens?

Page 22: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Chrysler Itself

Which of these match the Chrysler Sale Order?

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 22

Page 23: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Want to Read More?

Bankruptcy Litigation Blog http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/arc

hives/bankruptcy-in-the-news-chrysler-files-bankruptcy-part-i-assessing-the-financial-carnage.html

Credit Slips http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2009/0

5/chrysler-363-sales-again.html

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 23

Page 24: Class 23 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Chrysler Sale Order Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

More?

Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1242173568

36613091.html

April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 24