class 7 bankruptcy, spring, 2009 executory contracts randal c. picker leffmann professor of...

23
Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/[email protected] Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker. All

Upload: flora-watson

Post on 04-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Class 7Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009

Executory Contracts

Randal C. PickerLeffmann Professor of Commercial Law

The Law School

The University of Chicago

773.702.0864/[email protected] © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker. All Rights Reserved.

Page 2: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 2

Rejection

What does it mean to reject an executory contract? Rescind the contract? Breach the contract? Something else?

Consult 365(g)

Page 3: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 3

365 (cont.)

Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.) (g) Except as provided in subsections (h)(2) and

(i)(2) of this section, the rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor constitutes a breach of such contract or lease -

(1) if such contract or lease has not been assumed under this section or under a plan confirmed under chapter 9, 11, 12, or 13 of this title, immediately before the date of the filing of the petition; or

Page 4: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 4

365 (cont.) Executory contracts and unexpired leases (cont.)

(g)(2) if such contract or lease has been assumed under this section or under a plan confirmed under chapter 9, 11, 12, or 13 of this title -

(A) if before such rejection the case has not been converted under section 1112, 1208, or 1307 of this title, at the time of such rejection; or

(B) if before such rejection the case has been converted under section 1112, 1208, or 1307 of this title -

• (i) immediately before the date of such conversion, if such contract or lease was assumed before such conversion; or

• (ii) at the time of such rejection, if such contract or lease was assumed after such conversion.

Page 5: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 5

Leasing Services

The Question Does security interest that arises in

connection with lease transaction to secure debtor’s payments under the lease survive the rejection of the lease?

Page 6: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2000-08 Randal C. Picker 6

The Deal in Leasing Services

LSC

Chatham Metler

Bank

3: B lends secured to M

1:C leases two cranes to M; lease contains

SI in favor of C2: Assigns leases to

LSC; LSC perfects SI

M files for Ch7 and rejects leases: what happens to LSC’s SI?

Page 7: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 7

Register

Core Facts The Registers execute franchise agreement

with Silk Plants Agreement contains covenant not to

compete Registers file Ch 13 case, reject franchise

agreement Establish competing buiness

Page 8: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 8

Question

Does the covenant not to compete survive the rejection?

Page 9: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Section 1113. Rejection of collective bargaining

agreeements (a)

The debtor in possession, or the trustee if one has been appointed under the provisions of this chapter, other than a trustee in a case covered by subchapter IV of this chapter and by title I of the Railway Labor Act, may assume or reject a collective bargaining agreement only in accordance with the provisions of this section.

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 9

Page 10: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Section 1113

(b)(1) Subsequent to filing a petition and prior to

filing an application seeking rejection of a collective bargaining agreement, the debtor in possession or trustee (hereinafter in this section ‘‘trustee’’ shall include a debtor in possession), shall—

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 10

Page 11: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Section 1113

(A) make a proposal to the authorized representative of the employees covered by such agreement, based on the most complete and reliable information available at the time of such proposal, which provides for those necessary modifications in the employees benefits and protections that are necessary to permit the reorganization of the debtor and assures that all creditors, the debtor and all of the affected parties are treated fairly and equitably; and

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 11

Page 12: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Section 1113

(B) provide, subject to subsection (d)(3), the representative of the employees with such relevant information as is necessary to evaluate the proposal.

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 12

Page 13: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Section 1113

(2) During the period beginning on the date of the making of a proposal provided for in paragraph (1) and ending on the date of the hearing provided for in subsection (d)(1), the trustee shall meet, at reasonable times, with the authorized representative to confer in good faith in attempting to reach mutually satisfactory modifications of such agreement.

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 13

Page 14: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Section 1113

(c) The court shall approve an application for

rejection of a collective bargaining agreement only if the court finds that—

(1) the trustee has, prior to the hearing, made a proposal that fulfills the requirements of subsection (b)(1);

(2) the authorized representative of the employees has refused to accept such proposal without good cause; and

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 14

Page 15: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Section 1113

(3) the balance of the equities clearly favors rejection of such agreement.

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 15

Page 16: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Section 1113

(e) If during a period when the collective bargaining agreement

continues in effect, and if essential to the continuation of the debtor’s business, or in order to avoid irreparable damage to the estate, the court, after notice and a hearing, may authorize the trustee to implement interim changes in the terms, conditions, wages, benefits, or work rules provided by a collective bargaining agreement. Any hearing under this paragraph shall be scheduled in accordance with the needs of the trustee. The implementation of such interim changes shall not render the application for rejection moot.

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 16

Page 17: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Section 1113

(f) No provision of this title shall be construed

to permit a trustee to unilaterally terminate or alter any provisions of a collective bargaining agreement prior to compliance with the provisions of this section.

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 17

Page 18: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Northwest Airlines

What does rejection mean in Section 1113? Core Facts

NWA seeks modifications of flight attendant CBA

Negotiates and then does so within framework of National Mediation Board

9/05: NWA files Chapter 11

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 18

Page 19: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Northwest Airlines

11/05: Interim modifications granted [1113(e)]

03/06: NWA seeks to reject CBA; granted; NWA implements new terms and conditions

Flight attendants plan work action; NWA seeks to enjoin that

District court grants preliminary injunction

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 19

Page 20: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Relevant Labor Law Framework

Try Three Sources of Obligations The CBA Itself

“We the union agree not to strike” The Railway Labor Act

“Once you have a CBA in place, certain obligations kick in and stay in until the CBA expires”

• Seems to be the idea behind the RLA’s “status quo” rule

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 20

Page 21: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Relevant Labor Law Framework

The Railway Labor Act Again Even if there is no CBA in place, certain

obligations arise This is 45 USC 152 (First)

• It shall be the duty of all carriers, their officers, agents, and employees to exert every reasonable effort to make and maintain agreements concerning rates of pay, rules, and working conditions, and to settle all disputes, whether arising out of the application of such agreements or otherwise, in order to avoid any interruption to commerce or to the operation of any carrier growing out of any dispute between the carrier and the employees thereof.

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 21

Page 22: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Relevant Labor Law Framework

Norris LaGuardia Act Limits power of federal courts to issue

injunctions relating to labor law 29 USC 108

No restraining order or injunctive relief shall be granted to any complainant who has failed to comply with any obligation imposed by law which is involved in the labor dispute in question, or who has failed to make every reasonable effort to settle such dispute either by negotiation or with the aid of any available governmental machinery of mediation or voluntary arbitration.

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 22

Page 23: Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu

Issue on Appeal

What does a rejection under Section 1113 do to all of that?

April 20, 2023 Copyright © 2005-09 Randal C. Picker 23