clean energy goal- setting and planning...city program components energy savings annual energy...

58
Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning Webinar for Local Governments April 12, 2017

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Clean Energy Goal-Setting and Planning

Webinar for Local Governments

April 12, 2017

Page 2: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Susie Strife Sustainability Coordinator

Boulder County

Today’s Panelists

Sonrisa Lucero Sustainability Strategist

City and County of Denver

Shelby Sommer, Planning Practice Lead

Brendle Group

John Phelan Resource Conservation Manager

Fort Collins Utilities

Neil Kolwey Senior Associate

SWEEP

Marco Velotta Sustainability Planner

City of Las Vegas

Page 3: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Typical Planning Stages

Game Plan

Baseline

Vision Preliminary

Goals

Strategy Identification

Goal Refinement Action Planning

Implementation

Page 4: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Develop a plan for the

process

Outlining project stages and schedule

Developing communication

protocols

Identifying and recruiting

stakeholders

Game Plan

Page 5: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Establish a common

foundation for planning SWOT

Analysis Current

Conditions

Future Forecast

Impactful

Trends

Baseline

Page 6: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Clarify your intent and

ambitions

Vision

Ideal Future

Focus Areas

Page 7: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Identify what you want to

achieve

Structure

Ambition

Timeline

Metrics

Preliminary Goals

Page 8: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Vision

Goal Strategy

Strategy

Goal Strategy

Strategy

Strategy Identification

Identify how to

accomplish your goals

Page 9: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Review and adjust

preliminary goals (if

needed)

Technical analysis

Strategies identified

Political will/realities

Goal Refinement

Page 10: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Specify details for each

strategy

What

Where

When

Who

How

Action Planning

Page 11: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Make your vision reality

Implementation

Carrying out each strategy

Monitoring results

Communicating progress

Page 12: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

A Few Resources

Cities-LEAP (energy.gov)

City Energy Profiles

Local Action Toolkit

Xcel Energy

Partners in Energy

(CO & MN)

Community Energy

Reports

Page 13: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Fort Collins Headquarters

212 West Mulberry St.

Fort Collins, CO 80521

Page 14: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

How do you choose the right approach?

VOLUNTARY OR MANDATORY

CLEAN ENERGY ORDINANCES:

Page 15: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

The Right Approach?

Improve Performance

• Raise the bar

• Push the envelope

Options:

• Mandate it

• Incentivize it

• Make it easier

Voluntary:

-Partnership

-Graywater

Existing

Buildings:

B&T

New

Buildings:

Code

Make it

easier:

PACE

Page 16: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Denver’s GHG Emissions

Commercial and Multi-

family Buildings

57% Single Family Residential Buildings

14%

Transportation 27%

Street Lights 1%

Waste 1%

2012 Emissions by Sector (thousand mt-CO2e)

Commercial and Multi-family Buildings Single Family Residential Buildings

Transportation Street Lights

Waste

Page 17: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

2009 IECC

2015 IECC

27% Savings

2015 Building Code

Page 18: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

57% of total greenhouse gas emissions

Page 19: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014
Page 20: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Laying the Groundwork: Voluntary Program

3

Page 21: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Laying the Groundwork: Voluntary Program

Page 22: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

City Program

Components

Energy

Savings Annual Energy

Savings

Seattle1

2011 - 2013 Benchmarking

0.6% (over 2

years) 0.3%

San Francisco2

2010-2014

Benchmarking &

Transparency

7.9% (over 4

years) 2%

New York City3

2010 - 2013

Benchmarking &

Transparency

5.7% (over 3

years) 1.9%

Washington, D.C.4

2012 - 2013

Benchmarking &

Transparency

9% (over 3

years) 3%

1. Seattle Office of Sustainability & Environment. Building Energy Analysis Report 2013. (Executive Summary) Seattle staff indicated

that preliminary data shows energy usage going up in 2014.

2. San Francisco Department of the Environment and Urban Land Institute. San Francisco Existing Commercial Buildings Performance

Report 2010-2014. (p.14-15)

3. US Department of Energy. New York City Benchmarking and Transparency Policy Impact Evaluation Report, May 2015. (p. ii)

4. District Department of the Environment. http://doee.dc.gov/node/970312 (accessed 2/17/16)

The Case for Required

Benchmarking & Transparency

Page 23: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Projected Emissions with Energize Denver

10.8

11.3

11.8

12.3

12.8

mill

ion

MT

-CO

2e

Actual Projected Projection with Energize Denver Part 1

2020 Goal: 11.8 MMTons

Page 24: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Benchmarking and Transparency

Benchmarking Transparency

Transparency Exemptions

Confidential business practices

Notes field next to the score

16 other cities have these policies. They have seen 2-3% annual energy

savings, free tool, 4-5 hours to set up an account, 1-2 hours of staff time

to enter data annually.

Municipal, Commercial, and

Multi-family Buildings >50,000

sq ft 2017, >25,000 sq ft 2018

Page 25: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

PACE Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy

Page 26: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

PACE (cont.)

Page 27: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

PACE (cont.)

Page 28: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

PACE (cont.)

“United States Building Energy Efficiency Retrofits: Market Sizing and Financing Models.” Rockefeller

Foundation and Deutsche Bank Group. March 2012. Numbers scaled to City and County of Denver.

Page 29: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Package Approach

Voluntary:

-Partnership

-Graywater

Existing

Buildings:

B&T

New Buildings:

Code

Make it easier:

PACE

Page 30: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Resources

• Building Code: www.denvergov.org/buildingcode

• Benchmarking and Transparency:

– ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager

– Other cities with benchmarking and transparency requirements savings

calculations

– www.denvergov.org/energizedenver

– https://www.denvergov.org/content/dam/denvergov/Portals/771/docume

nts/BEH/DRAFT_Energize%20Denver%20Rule.pdf

– https://denver.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2892844&GUID=

360F45A4-3F9C-4FCC-8018-A60466CC3B7D&Options=&Search

• PACE financing

– http://copace.com/

– https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/energyoffice/colorado-c-pace

Page 31: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Further Questions

Sonrisa Lucero

Sustainability Strategist

Denver Mayor Michael B. Hancock’s

Office of Sustainability

[email protected]

720-865-9059

Page 32: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

32

Energy Policy and Building Scoring John Phelan, Resource Conservation Manager

April 12, 2017

Page 33: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

The Best Place to…

33

Page 34: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

34

Policy Goals

Climate Action Plan

• Reductions from 2005 baseline

• 20% by 2020

• 80% by 2030

• 100% by 2050

Energy Policy

• Efficiency targets

(up to 2.5% by 2020)

• Renewable energy

• 20% by 2020, 2% local

• Demand response (5% by 2020)

Page 35: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

35

Building Energy Scoring and More

• Building Energy Scoring

• Pilots 2017

• Future

requirements TBD

• City Energy Project

• Xcel Partners in Energy

Coming soon!

www.fcgov.com/BES

Page 36: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

36

Residential Asset Scores and More

Partners

• Home Energy Score (DOE)

• Efficiency Works Homes

• Colorado Energy Office

• Appraisal Institute

• Multiple Listing Service

Page 37: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

37

John Phelan

[email protected]

Page 38: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Funding ideas for

sustainability initiatives

Page 39: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

ELECTRICITY

USER TYPE TAX RATE

AVERAGE ANNUAL

TAX

Residential $0.0049 /kWh $21

Commercial $0.0009 /kWh $94

Industrial $0.0003 /kWh $9,600

Funding idea: Climate Action Plan Tax

• Based on amount of electricity used

• City of Boulder $1.8M revenue/ annually

Page 40: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Funding idea: Countywide Sustainability Tax

• Boulder County passed in 2016 by 70% of voters

• With no increase in any county tax, taking a

portion of a historically successful sales tax (open

space) to support sustainability initiatives.

• $8M revenue/annually

Page 41: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Funding idea: Fee on Cannabis industry

• Boulder County is requiring commercial marijuana

growers to either offset their electricity use with

renewable energy, or pay a 2.16 cent charge per

kWh

• Creation of an Energy Impact Offset Fund

Page 42: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Other ways to supporting sustainability projects

• Voluntary carbon offset fund

• C-PACE financing

• Bulk purchase programs

• Property tax abatement

• Collaborative partnerships with other communities

Page 43: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Thank You!

Susie Strife

Sustainability Coordinator

Boulder County

303-441-4565

[email protected]

Page 44: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Planning 101 • “Just because something doesn’t do what you

planned it to do doesn’t mean it’s useless.” – Thomas Edison

• “Make no little plans. They have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized. Make big plans; aim high in hope and work, remembering that a noble, logical diagram once recorded will never die, but long after we are gone will be a living thing, asserting itself with ever-growing insistency…. Think big.” – Daniel Burnham (Chicago architect/planner)

Page 45: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Planning 101 • Why do we plan? Why do we set goals?

– Humanity’s need for order

– Coping with complexity

– “Where are we going? What are we wanting to accomplish? How do we get there?”

• Once a city implements a plan, how do staff, officials, and citizens know it is being followed? Can there be deviations? What happens if/when they occur? (Talen, 1996; Velotta, 2008)

Page 46: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

U.S. Mayor’s Climate Protection Agreement (2005)

Climate Protection Resolution (R-57-2006)

Green Building Resolution (R-81-2006)

Energy code, Wind/solar ordinance, PC-CC Workshop (2007)

Urban Forestry Resolution (R-26-2008)

Sustainable Energy Strategy (R-50-2008)

Sustainability Office organized (2010)

Conservation Element of the 2020 Las Vegas Master Plan

City of Las Vegas Sustainability Initiative

Page 47: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

City Operations

Reinvestment of savings

Emissions

Renewable energy (installed capacity, share of load)

Energy Efficiency (by sector)

Clean fleet

Codes

Zoning and energy code (IECC)

Community programs

Green Building Program incentives

Home Performance with ENERGY STAR

Sustainable Energy Strategy: Goals and Targets

Page 48: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Reinvest in Conservation & Renewable

Energy

Capture Savings Reinvest in

Conservation & Renewable Energy

Capture Savings

$65 million investment

Page 49: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Sustainability Projects Solar Covered parking

(3 MW)

Solar plant (3 MW)

Facility energy efficiency upgrades

45,000 LED streetlights

6 LEED certified buildings

Water conservation & xeriscaping

Citywide recycling

Page 50: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

1,000,000

1,050,000

1,100,000

1,150,000

1,200,000

1,250,000

1,300,000

1,350,000

1,400,000

1,450,000

1,500,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

x 1

,00

0 G

allo

ns

Total Water Consumption

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Energy Consumption - MMBTU

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Energy Costs

Page 51: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard

10% 20%

30%

2011 2020 2030

10% 20%

30%

2011 2020 2030

Carbon Footprint Reduction

7 MW by 2015

3 MW by 2011

Renewable Energy

STATUS: 6.1 MW Installed

STATUS: 100%**

STATUS: 80% Reduction**

Meeting Targets

Page 52: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Downtown Master Plan

Page 53: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

The STAR Community Rating System is the nation’s first

comprehensive framework and certification program for

measuring local sustainability

Community Goal Setting

Page 54: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Outcomes: Quantitative indicators demonstrating progress

Actions: Contribute to the Objective’s mission

Built Environment Climate & Energy Economy & Jobs Education, Arts, &

Community

Equity & Empowerment

Health & Safety Natural Systems Innovation & Process

Community Goal Setting

Page 55: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Climate & Energy Reduce climate impacts through adaptation and mitigation efforts and increase resource efficiency

Key Findings • Reduction in GHG emissions • Electric/alternative vehicle increase • Aggressive Renewable Portfolio

Standards • Energy & water use reduction • High LEED building stock • Decrease in solid waste landfill disposal

Improvement Opportunities • Adaptation & Vulnerability plan

Climate & Energy Objectives Score

Climate Adaptation: Strengthen the resilience of communities to climate

change 7.2 / 15

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 13.4 / 20

Greening the Energy Supply: Transition the local energy supply toward the

use of renewables 10.9 / 15

Industrial Sector Resource Efficiency: Minimize resource use and demand

in the industrial sector 8.2 / 10

Resource Efficient Buildings: Improve energy and water efficiency of the

community’s building stock 14.5 / 15

Resource Efficient Public Infrastructure: Minimize resource use and

demand in public infrastructure 9.8 / 10

Waste Minimization: Reduce and reuse material waste produced in the

community 14 / 15

Climate & Energy Score: 77.9 / 100

Page 56: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

5 Megawatts of Hoover Dam hydropower

GOAL: Net-Zero

100%

Renewable

Energy

Page 57: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Some takeaways • Assess needs, gather data, set goals

• Coordinate with stakeholders (internally or externally) – public, Council/Commission, departments, utilities, private sector

• Identify, leverage, and secure financing

• Align projects with a capital improvement program

• Evaluate progress over time – what’s working? What’s not? Why? What can be fixed?

Page 58: Clean Energy Goal- Setting and Planning...City Program Components Energy Savings Annual Energy Savings Seattle1 2011 - 2013 Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 0.3% San Francisco2 2010-2014

Marco Velotta

City of Las Vegas

Planning Department

[email protected]

Thank you

http://www.lasvegasnevada.gov/sustainability