clh+final+exam+paper+nov+09+_rv+hjs+changes_

2
University of Cape Town Department of Private Law University Examinations October/November 2009 COP!"! T#$E LE%!L &#'TO"( "DL )00*& T#E !LLO+ED , T+O -2. &OU"' p s )1 min tes for re ain3 an pannin34 T5e )1 mintes reain3 time may be se ony for reain3 t5e 6estion paper an ma7in3 pannin3 notes on t5e eft85an pa3e or in t5e mar3in4 #N'T"UCT#ON', !nswer T&"EE 6est ions incin3 ! T LE!'T ONE fr om 'ection ! an !T LE!' T ONE from 'ection :4 ! 6es tion s are wei35te e6ay4  ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; 'ection ! 1. Are fo rma l modes of conve yance pr efer abl e to inf ormal one s? Ill ust rate y our answer with examples drawn from civilian legal history. 2. “There must be some valid cau se such as d onatio n sale or ot her con tract to ma!e the delivery an effectual transfer of the property" and in the present case there  being no such contract the property never passed to #olmes who could not therefore give a good title to the defendant.$ %&e 'illiers () in Beyers v McKenzie 1**+ ,oord 12- at p 12/ 0as  Beyers v McKenzie correctly decided? . A as!s “0ill you give me yo ur gol d bracelet?$ repl ies “3f cour se4$ Is this a valid contract in mo dern 5outh A frican law? 6xplain how 5o uth A frican law arrived at this position. 7. “If I thought that I was buyi ng the (or nel ian far m and you tha t you were sel ling the 5empronian the sale is void because we were not agreed upon the thing sold.$ %8lpian &.1*.1.9 pr/ To what extent is this statement still true in modern 5outh African law? To the extent that it is not why is 5outh African law different from :oman law?

Upload: maira-y

Post on 22-Feb-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

7/24/2019 CLH+Final+Exam+Paper+Nov+09+_RV+HJS+changes_

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clhfinalexampapernov09rvhjschanges 1/2

University of Cape Town

Department of Private Law

University Examinations

October/November 2009

COP!"!T#$E LE%!L &#'TO"(

"DL )00*&

T#E !LLO+ED , T+O -2. &OU"' ps )1 mintes for reain3 an

pannin34 T5e )1 mintes reain3 time may be se ony for reain3 t5e 6estion

paper an ma7in3 pannin3 notes on t5e eft85an pa3e or in t5e mar3in4

#N'T"UCT#ON', !nswer T&"EE 6estions incin3 !T LE!'T ONE from

'ection ! an !T LE!'T ONE from 'ection :4 ! 6estions are wei35te

e6ay4

 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; 

'ection !

1. Are formal modes of conveyance preferable to informal ones? Illustrate your 

answer with examples drawn from civilian legal history.

2. “There must be some valid cause such as donation sale or other contract to ma!e

the delivery an effectual transfer of the property" and in the present case there

 being no such contract the property never passed to #olmes who could not

therefore give a good title to the defendant.$ %&e 'illiers () in Beyers v McKenzie

1**+ ,oord 12- at p 12/

0as Beyers v McKenzie correctly decided?

. A as!s “0ill you give me your gold bracelet?$ replies “3f course4$

Is this a valid contract in modern 5outh African law? 6xplain how 5outh African

law arrived at this position.

7. “If I thought that I was buying the (ornelian farm and you that you were selling

the 5empronian the sale is void because we were not agreed upon the thing sold.$

%8lpian &.1*.1.9 pr/

To what extent is this statement still true in modern 5outh African law? To theextent that it is not why is 5outh African law different from :oman law?

7/24/2019 CLH+Final+Exam+Paper+Nov+09+_RV+HJS+changes_

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/clhfinalexampapernov09rvhjschanges 2/2

'ection :

-. ( is the editor of a newspaper. #e publishes a story about a politician & alleging

that & ta!es bribes. ( sincerely believes the story to be true. #owever he isunwilling to disclose his sources and so cannot prove that this is the case.

6xplain how modern 5outh African law would approach such a case and describe

the historical forces that have shaped this approach.

;. To what extent does modern 5outh African law recognise a tort of nuisance?

. “5omeone who has paid a sum of money or transferred property to anothererroneously believing that it was due to that person when in fact it was not due is

entitled to recover the sum of money or the property. The condictio indebiti  is

available provided that the mista!e <whether of fact or of law= was excusable.$ %&

'isser “8n>ustified 6nrichment in &u ois et al <eds= Wille’s Principles of South

 African Law <9th ed )uta 2++= 1+71 at p 1+-*/

0rite an historical commentary on this extract from Wille’s Principles.

*. To what extent has the development of 5outh African private law been a matter of 

chance?

Ens/