clinical measures of paediatric foot posture: a critical review

1
POSTER PRESENTATION Open Access Clinical measures of paediatric foot posture: a critical review Angela Evans * , Sheila Scutter, Katherine Kneebone From Australasian Podiatry Council Conference 2011 Melbourne, Australia. 26-29 April 2011 Background The paediatric flat foot is a common concern and has long been regarded as a problem, and feared to be potentially disabling. Definition of what exactly constitu- tes a flat foot remains surprisingly debatable, given its common presentation. Estimates of flat foot prevalence in children have been influenced by the varied the methods of assessment used to assess the foot posture, and the subsequent criteria employed to delineate feet as flat versus not flat. The aim of this literature review was therefore to evaluate the techniques of foot posture assessment in children and the reported reliability and validity of these measures. Method A systematic search of electronic databases including Medline (1966-present), CINAHL, SportDiscus, Embase, Scopus and Pedro occurred between 02/01/10 and 14/ 08/10. Eligible articles were selected according to pre- determined criteria. Methodological quality was evalu- ated by use of the Quality Index as described by Downs & Black, followed by critical analysis according to out- come variables. Results The most widely reported measures of paediatric foot posture were footprints and measures of the heel angle and arch height. The current evidence suggests that the reliability of all measures of paediatric foot posture is highly variable and mostly poor to moderate. The only measures on which validity has been explored are navi- cular height and footprints. Conclusion Whilst no definitive conclusions can currently be drawn from the existing evidence, the trend from the current literature indicates that static paediatric foot posture may be best-assessed using RCSP, NH or FPI-6. How- ever the relationship between static measures and pain, static measures and gait function remain largely unsub- stantiated in children. The direction of future research is to establish a universal method of assessment of pae- diatric foot posture, and the subsequent relevance of foot posture to pain and function across age groups. Continuation of research in this field will enable target- ing of design parameters towards variables that are sup- ported by evidence, and which may directly advance clinical decision-making. Published: 20 May 2011 doi:10.1186/1757-1146-4-S1-P20 Cite this article as: Evans et al.: Clinical measures of paediatric foot posture: a critical review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2011 4(Suppl 1):P20. Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: Convenient online submission Thorough peer review No space constraints or color figure charges Immediate publication on acceptance Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar Research which is freely available for redistribution Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit * Correspondence: [email protected] School of Health Science, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, Australia Evans et al. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2011, 4(Suppl 1):P20 http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/S1/P20 JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH © 2011 Evans et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Upload: angela-evans

Post on 06-Jul-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Clinical measures of paediatric foot posture: a critical review

POSTER PRESENTATION Open Access

Clinical measures of paediatric foot posture: acritical reviewAngela Evans*, Sheila Scutter, Katherine Kneebone

From Australasian Podiatry Council Conference 2011Melbourne, Australia. 26-29 April 2011

BackgroundThe paediatric flat foot is a common concern and haslong been regarded as a problem, and feared to bepotentially disabling. Definition of what exactly constitu-tes a flat foot remains surprisingly debatable, given itscommon presentation. Estimates of flat foot prevalencein children have been influenced by the varied themethods of assessment used to assess the foot posture,and the subsequent criteria employed to delineate feetas flat versus not flat. The aim of this literature reviewwas therefore to evaluate the techniques of foot postureassessment in children and the reported reliability andvalidity of these measures.

MethodA systematic search of electronic databases includingMedline (1966-present), CINAHL, SportDiscus, Embase,Scopus and Pedro occurred between 02/01/10 and 14/08/10. Eligible articles were selected according to pre-determined criteria. Methodological quality was evalu-ated by use of the Quality Index as described by Downs& Black, followed by critical analysis according to out-come variables.

ResultsThe most widely reported measures of paediatric footposture were footprints and measures of the heel angleand arch height. The current evidence suggests that thereliability of all measures of paediatric foot posture ishighly variable and mostly poor to moderate. The onlymeasures on which validity has been explored are navi-cular height and footprints.

ConclusionWhilst no definitive conclusions can currently be drawnfrom the existing evidence, the trend from the currentliterature indicates that static paediatric foot posturemay be best-assessed using RCSP, NH or FPI-6. How-ever the relationship between static measures and pain,static measures and gait function remain largely unsub-stantiated in children. The direction of future researchis to establish a universal method of assessment of pae-diatric foot posture, and the subsequent relevance offoot posture to pain and function across age groups.Continuation of research in this field will enable target-ing of design parameters towards variables that are sup-ported by evidence, and which may directly advanceclinical decision-making.

Published: 20 May 2011

doi:10.1186/1757-1146-4-S1-P20Cite this article as: Evans et al.: Clinical measures of paediatric footposture: a critical review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2011 4(Suppl1):P20.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Centraland take full advantage of:

• Convenient online submission

• Thorough peer review

• No space constraints or color figure charges

• Immediate publication on acceptance

• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

• Research which is freely available for redistribution

Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit

* Correspondence: [email protected] of Health Science, University of South Australia, North Terrace,Adelaide, 5000, Australia

Evans et al. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2011, 4(Suppl 1):P20http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/S1/P20

JOURNAL OF FOOTAND ANKLE RESEARCH

© 2011 Evans et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction inany medium, provided the original work is properly cited.