collaborative approaches to infrastructure...
TRANSCRIPT
Collaborative Approaches toInfrastructure Security
Will Kirksey, P.E.Senior FellowCERF/IIECAn affiliate of ASCE
I I E C
Overview
Value of collaborationExisting initiatives and opportunities
TISPCIRIDRILLVOLTAG
Potential next steps
I I E C
Value of Collaboration
Transportation is essential to nearly everyother sector:Cross sector threats and responsesInterdependenciesMutual learning opportunitiesHarmonization of methods and metrics
I I E C
Appropriate Collaboration
Support decentralized responsePromote and support specificorganizational activitiesHarmonize methods, but no cookbooksLeverage resourcesExpand and speed communication
I I E C
Existing Initiatives andOpportunities
The Infrastructure Security Partnership (TISP)– USACE and othersThe Critical Infrastructure Response Initiative(CIRI) – ASCE
Disaster Response Initiative at the Local Level(DRILL)Volunteer Technical Assistance Group (VOLTAG)ASCE SC Section and SAME
CERF/IIEC Executive Program Series
I I E C
TISP
An “association of associations”Open to all local state and federalagencies; professional associations,societies, and trade groups; etc.Focus: leverage the collective technicalexpertise and R, D, & D capability ofprofessionals in the design andconstruction industry and government,
I I E C
TISP Functions
Facilitate dialogueProvide technical supportComment on public policyBuild specific collaborativeprograms
I I E C
TISP Activities & Objectives
Support individual members in meetingspecific responsibilities for infrastructuresecurity and protectionDevelop integrated solutionsUndertake joint efforts as appropriateConduct a quarterly discussion forum on keyissuesConduct an annual conference (#1 will beNovember 5-7, 2002)
I I E C
TISP Activities & Objectives (continued)
Promote broad collaboration andparticipationEnsure effective communicationHelp identify and disseminate key dataand informationBuild synergy and professionalrelationshipsDevelop methods and protocols
I I E C
TISP Membership
Founding members: AIA, ACEC, ASCE,SAME, FEMA, FFC, AGC, NAVFAC, NIST,and USACEOffice of Homeland Security (ex-officio)Over 40 organizations have expressedinterest in joiningNo fee to join
I I E C
ASCE’s CIRI
Response on multiple levelsBuilding Performance Study TeamsSupport to the professionDeveloping local networks
DRILLVOLTAG
I I E C
ASCE’s CIRI –Professional Support
Assessing infrastructure vulnerabilityPrioritizing infrastructure renovationIdentifying R&D needs for new approaches toprotecting critical infrastructureDeveloping retrofit designs to mitigatedamage from disastersDeveloping new design procedures (includingcodes and standards)Improving disaster preparedness andresponse
I I E C
ASCE’s CIRI – Local Networks
Disaster response is primarily localResponders need:
Technical assistanceInformationCommunication supportPlanning and practice
ASCE, SAME, TISP and others areworking to develop these capabilities
I I E C
Overview of CERF Forum
Held October 23 & 24, 2001,First post-9/11 national gathering of designand construction industry leadersOver 150 senior leaders participatedThe meeting was designed to:
Share experiences from efforts underwayProvide a basis for ongoing coordinationCreate the basis for a plan of action
I I E C
Overview of CERF Forum(continued)
The program was designed around threethemes:Government and InstitutionalPerspectiveClinical and technical perspectiveEnvironmental and utility infrastructureconsiderations
I I E C
Analysis needs:
Method for integrated analysis ofthreats, assets, and risksIndependent, objective, inter-disciplinary assessment of technologyConsistent standards and metricsRe-examination of codes and standards
I I E C
Process Needs:
Enhanced communications within andbetween government, the private sector, andthe publicPre-approval and pre-qualification of disastermitigation technologiesFocus on better management ofconsequencesCreate local and regional response networksDevelop integrated training, education, andtechnology transfer programs
I I E C
Points of Vulnerability
Concentrated and/or valuable assets“Iconic” structures, monuments, or facilitiesLarge gatherings of people – e.g., sportingevents, transportation hubs, theme parks,shopping malls, etc.Leverage points – i.e., where small actionswould have large impacts (e.g., waterpumping stations)
I I E C
Current technologies(Needing enhancement)
Smart communications and sensor systemsfor monitoring and surveillanceScenario- based models for contingencyplanning and trainingModular “safe havens” and life supportequipment for on site storageImproved command, communications, andcontrol capabilityAdvanced materials for strength, resilience,and self-repair
I I E C
Current technologies(Needing enhancement - cont.)
Redundant and/or mobile command centersEmergency backup infrastructure systems(e.g., redundant energy and water supplies)Response and rescue equipmentRestrictions on surface transportation accessto buildings and facilitiesBackflow prevention in water systems
I I E C
Near-Term R&D Needs
Needs were identified in three categories:Systems AnalysisIntelligent InfrastructureSpecific Technologies
I I E C
Near-Term R&D Needs:Systems Analysis
Integrated modeling of regional infrastructurecomponents (w/ scenario capability)Simulation studies of various facility typesAdaptation of military-type gaming andintelligence gathering methodsIT to integrate monitoring and surveillancewith operations and maintenance systems
I I E C
Near-Term R&D Needs:Intelligent Infrastructure
Distributed intelligent networks as the basisof designLow cost sensors and monitoring systemsSmart materials for sensing and self-repairTracking for potential weapons (e.g., tankertrucks, construction equipment, buses, etc.)Common data protocolsComprehensive chemical/biological analysison a chip and cheap sensors
I I E C
Near-Term R&D Needs:Intelligent Infrastructure (cont.)
Example: Smart Tunnel integrating sensors and systemscontrols:HVAC system senses fire, toxic or bio agentTakes automatic action depending on nature andlocation of threat, e.g:
Reverses flow to protect occupantsStops flow to isolate contaminantsRoutes flow through special filters or catalystsActivates fire extinguishers
Alerts occupants and recommends actionsEtc.
I I E C
Near-Term R&D Needs:Specific Technologies
Examples for all infrastructure sectors:Cost effective drilling and excavation methods tomove critical facilities undergroundDecentralize, miniaturize, and network infrastructuresystems and other assetsImprove fire resistanceDevelop non-toxic alternatives for chemicals used ininfrastructure (e.g., chlorine for water treatment)Identification of military ‘dual use’ technologies
I I E C
Near-Term R&D Needs:Specific Technologies (continued)
Examples from the Buildings Sector:Improved egress design, education, andtrainingMaterials and design innovation to strengthenbuilding envelopes and structuresCreate new, integrated barrier designsIntegrate HVAC operations with chemical andtoxic monitoring, filtering, etc.
I I E C
Near-Term R&D Needs:Specific Technologies (continued)
Examples from the Water Sector:Protect distribution systems
In-line, real time monitors and controlsBackflow prevention
Protect Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition(SCADA) systems from hackingReduce vulnerabilities from interdependence
Electricity outageDisruption of chlorine deliveries
Cost-effective alternatives for small town/ruralsystems
I I E C
Near-Term R&D Needs:Specific Technologies (continued)
Examples from the energy sector:Distributed generationCost-effective undergroundtransmission and distributionDomestic vehicle fuelsPipeline monitoring and surveillance
I I E C
Emerging Concerns & Issues
Conducting whole systems analyses ofinfrastructure systemsDesigning to consider human factors invulnerabilityDeveloping multi-purpose technology (e.g.,disaster mitigation and public safety orenvironmental control) to enhance cost-effectivenessAccelerating technology transfer anddeployment
I I E C
Potential Next Steps
Join TISPParticipate in Nov 2002 meetingGet involved in ASCE CIRIAttend next CERF/IIEC ExecutiveProgram Series (April 2002)Consider a transportation sector summitmeeting for specific activities
I I E C
ConclusionWe have an unprecedented opportunity to
rethink infrastructure science and technology.For example, the infrastructure of the future could be:Mass produced in small, modular unitsFunctionally integrated (e.g. water, energy, and solidwaste disposal in one unit)Delivered and installed at point of use (decentralized)Plug and play components of a distributed networkMostly low value targets for terroristsPart of a widespread monitoring and surveillancesystem to detect threats and aid response