sound model: collaborative infrastructure for digital audio
DESCRIPTION
Sound Model: Collaborative Infrastructure for digital audio. SAA--Perfecting your pitch Liz Bishoff, Director BCR Digital & Preservation Services August 13, 2009. CDP & IMLS Sound Model Grant. CDP served as a model for library & cultural heritage collaboration - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Sound Model: Collaborative Infrastructure for digital audio
SAA--Perfecting your pitch Liz Bishoff, Director
BCR Digital & Preservation ServicesAugust 13, 2009
CDP & IMLS Sound Model Grant
• CDP served as a model for library & cultural heritage collaboration
• Provided infrastructure for digitization of primary source materials
• Digital audio collections represented collective memory of those who populated the Rocky Mtn West
• “Collectively, these local sounds and voices represent development of western history from an extraordinarily broad yet person perspective, putting a human voice to the text and images already available in CDP’s Heritage [database].”
IMLS Sound Model Project goals:
• Expanded toolkit for collaborative project management.
• Model regional collection of digital sound recordings. • Enhanced training materials• A diverse but standards-based and interoperable
approach to finding aids• A diverse but standards-based and interoperable
approach to presentation of audio material• Lesson plans that conform to state K-12 standards
Project outcomes
• Created 1500 hours of digital audio
• Updated and expanded Digital Audio Best Practices
• Created exhibit that integrates digital images and audio
http://www.bcr.org/dps/cdp/archive/exhibits/soundmodel/intro.html
Collaboration and Innovation
• 2000 audio objects—20 organizations
• Centralized digitization of audio files--SafeSound
• Centralized streaming—University of Denver
• Audio retrieval via Speech Find—University of Texas-Dallas
• Rights management support—Michigan State
• Centralized metadata—CDP Heritage West
What worked:
• Outsourcing works• Shared access works• Exhibits—enhances the
images and brings life to the oral histories and sound recordings
• Digital Audio Best Practices Version 2.0 expanded and revised
What didn’t go so well• Transcribing
– Quality of originals resulted in increased editing– Multiple iterations of editing would have improved
quality– Speechfind is still a ‘research project’.
• Lack of transcripts– No metadata or original transcripts resulted in an
in ability to match content on return from post processing
• Content management system– Wasn’t ready for us
Where are we now?
• Project ended in 2007• BCR and DU continue to partner to make the
Sound Model content available• BCR is exploring options for new content
management system to continue hosting the Sound Model content
• BCR has submitted an IMLS grant for long term access solution creating the MetaArchive West