columbia sportswear v. team ortho foundation - complaint

8/20/2019 Columbia Sportswear v. Team Ortho Foundation - Complaint

1/81

PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION - CHICAGO

COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR NORTHAMERICA, INC., an Oregon corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEAM ORTHO FOUNDATION, INC., aMinnesota non-profit organization,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:16-cv-01052

JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT, COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT,TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT, UNFAIR COMPETITION, FALSE DESIGNATION

OF ORIGIN, AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES

Plaintiff, Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. (“Columbia Sportswear”), brings this

Complaint against Defendant Team Ortho Foundation, Inc. (“Team Ortho”), and alleges as

follows:

1. Plaintiff is a part of the Columbia Sportswear family of companies (the

“Columbia Sportswear Group”) that designs, manufactures, advertises, markets, promotes and

sells, directly and through authorized retailers, various kinds of clothing and accessories

(including outerwear, sportswear, footwear, headgear, camping equipment, skiwear and sleeping

bags) under the COLUMBIA® brand throughout the world.

NATURE OF THE ACTION

2. This is an action for patent infringement, copyright infringement, trade dress

infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, and violation of applicable state

statutory and common law. The action arises under the federal Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 et

seq.; the federal Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.; the federal Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.

§§ 1051 et seq.; and Illinois’ Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 815 ILCS §§ 510/1 et seq.

3. This lawsuit pertains in part to Team Ortho’s infringement of Columbia

Case: 1:16-cv-01052 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/25/16 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1


2/81

- 2 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

Sportswear’s U.S. Patent No. D650,529 (the “’529 Patent”), a copy of which is attached as

Exhibit 1; U.S. Patent No. D670,435 (the “’435 Patent”), a copy of which is attached as

Exhibit 2; U.S. Patent No. 8,424,119 (the “’119 Patent”), a copy of which is attached as

Exhibit 3; and U.S. Patent No. 8,453,270 (the “’270 Patent”), a copy of which is attached as

Exhibit 4 (collectively, the “Columbia Sportswear Patents”). Collectively, these patents protect

Columbia Sportswear’s widely-recognized Omni-Heat® technology, a proprietary heat reflective

material that regulates temperature by retaining body heat and also provides other desirable

features, such as breathability and moisture wicking. This innovative material is featured as a

lightweight lining in body gear such as jackets, shirts, gloves, socks and headwear sold under the

COLUMBIA® brand.

4. This lawsuit also pertains to Team Ortho’s infringement of certain copyright

rights belonging to Columbia Sportswear in its marketing materials and images (the “Columbia

Sportswear Copyrights”) that Columbia Sportswear uses to promote and market its Omni-Heat

products.

5. This lawsuit also pertains to Team Ortho’s infringement of trade dress carefully

developed by the Columbia Sportswear Group. Since 2010, the Columbia Sportswear Group has

manufactured, used, advertised, marketed, promoted, offered for sale and sold in the United

States various products, including various items of apparel, with a silver colored dot pattern (the

“Silver Dot Trade Dress”). This distinctive silver-colored dot pattern, which has been used

consistently on products featuring Columbia Sportswear’s Omni-Heat technology, has come to

be associated exclusively with the COLUMBIA® brand and its products and distinguishes its

products from those manufactured and sold by others. Through dedicated and consistent

presentation of the Silver Dot Trade Dress —emphasized by the use of such “look for”

promotional language as “Magic in a Little Silver Dot”— the Columbia Sportswear Group has

developed a reputation and acquired substantial goodwill in the Silver Dot Trade Dress. Hence,

this lawsuit pertains in part to Team Ortho’s infringement of the Silver Dot Trade Dress under

the Lanham Act and Illinois’ Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.



3/81

- 3 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

6. Team Ortho is flagrantly using the Columbia Sportswear Patents, the Columbia

Sportswear Copyrights and the Silver Dot Trade Dress, without Columbia Sportswear’s

permission, on cold weather athletic pullovers that Team Ortho makes, has made, uses, offers for

sale, sells and/or imports into the United States, including in Chicago, Illinois.

7. Columbia Sportswear seeks, among other relief, an injunction preventing Team

Ortho from further infringing the Columbia Sportswear Patents, the Columbia Sportswear

Copyrights and the Silver Dot Trade Dress, together with damages and/or disgorgement of Team

Ortho’s profits from its infringing activity and attorneys’ fees and costs.

THE PARTIES

8.

Plaintiff Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. is a corporation organized and

existing under the laws of the State of Oregon, with its principal place of business located in

Portland, Oregon. Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of

Columbia Sportswear Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State

of Oregon, with its principal place of business in Portland, Oregon. Columbia Sportswear North

America, Inc. owns the Columbia Sportswear Patents, the Columbia Sportswear Copyrights, and

the Silver Dot Trade Dress used in connection with Omni-Heat products sold under the

COLUMBIA® brand.

9. On information and belief, Team Ortho is a Minnesota non-profit organization

having a principal place of business located in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

10. Columbia Sportswear’s causes of action for patent infringement, copyright

infringement, and Lanham Act violations against Team Ortho arise under the laws of the United

States, including 35 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq., and 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq.

This Court has original jurisdiction over this subject matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332,

and 1338(a) and 15 U.S.C. § 1121(a). The Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Columbia

Sportswear’s state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.



4/81

- 4 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

11. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Team Ortho because it transacts and

solicits business in the State of Illinois, including with respect to the infringing products at issue

in this case, and because Team Ortho is committing and has committed acts of infringement in

this district by selling, offering to sell and using infringing products in this district, including in

Chicago, Illinois, and by inducing retailers to distribute its infringing products in this district. In

connection with its distribution and sale of products that infringe the Columbia Sportswear

Patents and the Silver Dot Trade Dress, Team Ortho has also reproduced, publicly displayed and

distributed promotional materials and images in this district which infringe the Columbia

Sportswear Copyrights. Further, Team Ortho maintains an Internet site available to consumers

within this district on which it advertises its products and hosts an interactive function whereby

users can order Team Ortho products for pick-up at a nearby location or — for an additional fee —

to be mailed to them directly. Most recently, Team Ortho directed sales of the infringing

products through its Internet site to consumers within this district in connection with the “Polar

Dash” races held in Chicago on January 9, 2016, as described further below.

12. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) & (c) and

1400(a) & (b) because Team Ortho regularly transacts and solicits business in this district,

including with respect to the infringing products at issue in this case, and because Team Ortho is

committing and has committed acts of infringement in this district by selling, offering to sell,

using and distributing products in this district that infringe upon the Columbia Sportswear

Patents and the Silver Dot Trade Dress, and by reproducing, displaying and distributing

promotional materials within this judicial district that infringe upon the Columbia Sportswear

Copyrights.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Columbia Sportswear and its Proprietary Technology

13. Columbia Sportswear is a leading innovator in the global outdoor apparel,

footwear, accessories and equipment markets. Founded in 1938, Columbia Sportswear apparel,

footwear, accessories and outdoor equipment have earned a reputation for innovation, quality



5/81

- 5 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

and performance, serving the needs of outdoor enthusiasts in more than 100 countries.

A. The Columbia Sportswear Patents

14. Columbia Sportswear has taken steps to protect its innovations and designs,

including those surrounding its well-known Omni-Heat technology. Relevant to this case,

Columbia Sportswear owns all right, title, and interest in the ’529 Patent, entitled “PATTERNED

HEAT REFLECTIVE MATERIAL,” which covers the ornamental design for the heat reflective

material as shown and described in the figures incorporated into the ’529 Patent. Figures 1 and 4

of the ’529 Patent, which show a perspective view and elevational view of the heat reflective

material, are shown below:

Figure 3 of the ’529 patent shows the heat reflective material as used in a jacket:



6/81

- 6 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

15. Columbia Sportswear also owns all right, title, and interest in the ’435 Patent,

entitled “HEAT REFLECTIVE MATERIAL WITH PATTERN,” which covers the ornamental

design for the heat reflective material as shown and described in the figures incorporated into the

’435 Patent. Figure 2 of the ’435 Patent, which shows the heat reflective material as used in a

jacket, is shown below:

16. Columbia Sportswear also owns all right, title, and interest in the ’119 Patent,

entitled “PATTERNED HEAT MANAGEMENT MATERIAL,” which is directed to body gear

using an array of heat managing elements coupled to a base material to direct body heat while

also maintaining desirable transfer and other functional properties of the base material.

Figure 1A of the ’119 Patent depicts use of the heat management material in a jacket:



7/81

- 7 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

17. Columbia Sportswear also owns all right, title, and interest in the ‘270 Patent,

entitled “PATTERNED HEAT MANAGEMENT MATERIAL,” which, like the ’119 Patent, is

directed to body gear using an array of heat managing elements coupled to a base material to

direct body heat while also maintaining desirable transfer properties of the base material. Like

the ’119 Patent, Figure 1A of the ‘270 Patent depicts use of the heat management material in a

jacket:



8/81

- 8 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

B. The Silver Dot Trade Dress

18. The evenly-distributed, small silver dot pattern used on COLUMBIA®-branded

Omni-Heat products — the Silver Dot Trade Dress — is arbitrary and inherently distinctive. The

overall design of the Silver Dot Trade Dress is non-functional, as demonstrated, for example, by

the number of alternative design configurations disclosed in the ’119 and ’270 Patents, each of

which could perform equally well the heat retention, breathing, and moisture-wicking functions

of the Omni-Heat technology. Several such embodiments are pictured in Figures 2A-B and 3A-

E of the ’119 and ’270 Patents, reproduced below.

19. Supported by its portfolio of design and utility patents, since at least as early as

2010, the Columbia Sportswear Group has been the exclusive source of Omni-Heat products

featuring the Silver Dot Trade Dress, and currently offers hundreds of distinct products featuring

the Silver Dot Trade Dress, including shirts, jackets, headwear, gloves, socks, sleeping bags, and

a variety of other products.

20. As a result of its longstanding, continuous and exclusive use, the Columbia

Sportswear Group has built up valuable recognition and goodwill in its distinctive Silver Dot



9/81

- 9 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

Trade Dress. The Columbia Sportswear Group has expended, and continues to expend,

substantial time, effort, money, and other resources to develop and maintain the valuable

goodwill that has come to be associated with Omni-Heat products incorporating the unique and

recognizable Silver Dot Trade Dress.

21. The Columbia Sportswear Group has continuously and extensively advertised,

marketed and promoted its Omni-Heat products in the United States and around the world,

investing substantial sums in such activities, including advertising directed to the distinctive,

non-functional aspects of the appearance of Omni-Heat products, such as its widely-used

marketing slogan, “Magic in a Little Silver Dot.”

22.

As a r esult of the Columbia Sportswear Group’s efforts, the Silver Dot Trade

Dress has acquired secondary meaning and distinctiveness among outdoor and athletic

enthusiasts and members of the industry, and it continues to have secondary meaning and

distinctiveness. Omni-Heat products displaying the Silver Dot Trade Dress are now widely

known and recognized by their unique, ornamental and distinctive appearance, which identifies

to sportswear consumers and industry members that their source of origin is the Columbia

Sportswear Group and its COLUMBIA® brand.

23. Based on the foregoing, the Silver Dot Trade Dress has become and now is a

designation of origin of Columbia Sportswear.

C. The Columbia Sportswear Copyrights

24. Columbia Sportswear has taken steps to protect its original works of authorship,

including the technical graphics, text, images and associated online works it uses to market and

promote its well-known Omni-Heat technology, including but not limited to the works displayed

in paragraphs 29 and 30, infra, of this Complaint. Those works are the subject of copyright

applications filed with the U.S. Copyright Office.

Team Ortho and its Infringing Activities

25. Team Ortho produces foot racing events in this district, including the “Chicago

Polar Dash” in January, the “Chicago Get Lucky” run in March, the “Chicago Tiki Run” in June,



10/81

- 10 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

the “Chicago Women ROCK” run in September and the “Chicago Monster Dash” on Halloween.

Team Ortho produces similar running events in Minneapolis and Dallas/Fort Worth.

26. On information and belief, at its most recent running event in this district, the

“Chicago Polar Dash,” and at other running events it produces, Team Ortho sells, off ers to sell,

uses and induces others to use athletic pullovers under its own brand that incorporate a lining

with reflective material as shown below:

27. In the everted and close-up images below, the pullover’s heat-reflective lining is

clearly visible:



11/81

- 11 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

28. The pullover’s heat-reflective lining as pictured in paragraph 27, supra, infringes

the Columbia Sportswear Patents and the Silver Dot Trade Dress.

29. Removing any doubt that Team Ortho’s infringement of the Columbia Sportswear

Patents and the Silver Dot Trade Dress was and is willful, the advertising hang tags attached to

the Team Ortho pullover distributed at the “Chicago Polar Dash” includes an identical technical

graphic and verbatim copy of the marketing materials used by Columbia Sportswear to promote

its genuine Omni-Heat products, and even goes so far as to include Columbia Sportswear’s

Omni-Heat slogan, “Magic in a Little Silver Dot.” Specifically, the hang tag attached to the

infringing products reads:

(1) This breathable warming technology helps regulate your temperature with littlesilver dots that reflect and retain the warmth your body generates.

(2) Features Reflects body heat

Highly breathable

Reduces your need for bulky layers

Wicks moisture to keep you dry and comfortable

The hang tag also clearly displays Columbia Sportswear’s own graphic used to illustrate the



12/81

- 12 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

technical features of Columbia Sportswear’s Omni-Heat technology, as shown below:

30. By way of comparison, reproduced below is an image from Columbia

Sportswear’s website containing the slogan, “Magic in a Little Silver Dot,” also juxtaposed with

a picture of the Silver Dot Trade Dress. This image is viewable at

http://www.columbia.com/technology-omniheatreflective/.


http://www.columbia.com/technology-omniheatreflective/http://www.columbia.com/technology-omniheatreflective/http://www.columbia.com/technology-omniheatreflective/


13/81

- 13 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

31. Reproduced below is another image from Columbia Sportswear’s website which

contains the exact language – word for word – that Team Ortho copied and included on the hang

tag attached to its infringing products. This image from Columbia Sportswear’s website is

viewable at https://www.columbia.com/technology-landing.html and can be accessed by clicking

the bar labeled “Omni-Heat™ Reflective.”

32. On information and belief, Team Ortho imports, sells, offers to sell, uses, and

induces others to use its infringing pullovers and other running gear to participants in foot race

events that Team Ortho produces in Chicago and other cities around the country.

33. Team Ortho promotes these events months in advance, inducing runners to pay

registration fees of anywhere from $24.99 to $119.99.

34.

According to Team Ortho’s website, over 265,000 people have participated in its

races over the last five years.

35. On information and belief, in exchange for their “registration fees,” in addition to

being permitted to run the race, participants in Team Ortho events receive a “packet” of running


https://www.columbia.com/technology-landing.htmlhttps://www.columbia.com/technology-landing.htmlhttps://www.columbia.com/technology-landing.htmlhttps://www.columbia.com/technology-landing.html


14/81

- 14 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

gear that include the infringing pullovers, as well as hats, jackets, sweatshirts, and/or other

sportswear.

36. Team Ortho actively markets its sportswear on its website with images and other

promotional material. For example, the following language is viewable at

http://www.teamortho.us/about-us.html:

37. On information and belief, Team Ortho invites participants to pick up their

packets at a local retailer, or, for an additional fee of $29.99, Team Ortho will mail the running

gear directly to the registrant.

38. For example, in the case of the “Polar Dash” r aces held in Chicago on January 9,

2016, participants retrieved their packets from the Sports Authority store located at 3134 North

Clark Street in Chicago.

39. Columbia Sportswear obtained the infringing pullover pictured herein from a

participant in the January 9, 2016 “Polar Dash” event in Chicago, and has confirmed through

analysis and testing that the pullovers’ reflective lining infringes the ’119 and ’270 Patents.

COUNT I –

INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES

PATENT D650,529

40. Columbia Sportswear restates and realleges each of the allegations, photographs

and figures of paragraphs 1-39 as if fully set forth herein.

41. Team Ortho has infringed the ’529 Patent within this judicial district by

manufacturing or importing into, using, inducing others to use, selling and/or offering for sale


http://www.teamortho.us/about-us.htmlhttp://www.teamortho.us/about-us.htmlhttp://www.teamortho.us/about-us.html


15/81

- 15 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

sportswear products, including but not limited to the pullover depicted herein, that embody the

patented design disclosed in the ’529 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 289.

42. Team Ortho is not licensed or otherwise authorized by Columbia Sportswear to

make, use, import, sell, or offer to sell any product with heat reflective material whose design is

covered by the ’529 Patent and its conduct is, in every instance, without Columbia Sportswear’s

consent.

43. The design of Team Ortho’s infringing sportswear so closely resembles the design

disclosed in the ’529 Patent that an ordinary observer will perceive the overall appearance of the

designs to be substantially the same.

44.

On information and belief, Team Ortho intended to copy the design covered by

the ‘529 Patent.

45. Team Ortho will continue to manufacture, import, sell, use and induce others to

use its infringing sportswear unless enjoined by this Court.

46. Due to Team Ortho’s infringement of the ’529 Patent, Columbia Sportswear is

entitled to recover from Team Ortho damages adequate to compensate for the infringement in an

amount subject to proof at trial, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty, together with

interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284. As an alternative remedy for

Team Ortho’s infringement of the ’529 Patent, Columbia Sportswear is entitled to recover Team

Ortho’s total profits from the sale of its infringing sportswear, but not less than $250, under

35 U.S.C. § 289.

47. Due to Team Ortho’s infringement of the ’529 Patent, Columbia Sportswear has

suffered, is suffering, and will continue to suffer irreparable injury and damage for which

Columbia Sportswear has no adequate remedy at law. Columbia Sportswear is therefore entitled

to a permanent injunction against Team Ortho’s further infringing conduct.



16/81

- 16 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

COUNT II –


PATENT D670,435

48.

Columbia Sportswear restates and realleges each of the allegations, photographs

and figures of paragraphs 1-39 and 41-47 as if fully set forth herein.

49. Team Ortho has infringed the ’435 Patent within this judicial district by

manufacturing or importing into, using, inducing others to use, selling and/or offering for sale

sportswear products, including but not limited to the pullover depicted herein, that embody the

patented design disclosed in the ’435 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 289.

50.

Team Ortho is not licensed or otherwise authorized by Columbia Sportswear to

make, use, import, sell, or offer to sell any product with heat reflective material whose design is

covered by the ’435 Patent and its conduct is, in every instance, without Columbia Sportswear’s

consent.

51. The design of Team Ortho’s infringing sportswear so closely resembles the design

disclosed in the ’435 Patent that an ordinary observer will perceive the overall appearance of the

design to be substantially the same.

52. On information and belief, Team Ortho intended to copy the design covered by

the ‘435 Patent.


use its infringing sportswear unless enjoined by this Court.

54. Due to Team Ortho’s infringement of the ’435 Patent, Columbia Sportswear is

entitled to recover from Team Ortho damages adequate to compensate for the infringement in an

amount subject to proof at trial, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty, together with

interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284. As an alternative remedy for

Team Ortho’s infringement of the ’435 Patent, Columbia Sportswear is entitled to recover Team

Ortho’s total profits from the sale of its infringing sportswear, but not less than $250, under

35 U.S.C. § 289.



17/81

- 17 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

55. Due to Team Ortho’s infringement of the ’435 Patent, Columbia Sportswear has




COUNT III –


PATENT 8,424,119



57.

Team Ortho has been, and presently is, infringing the ’119 Patent, literally or

under the doctrine of equivalents, within this judicial district by manufacturing, importing, using,

inducing others to use, selling and/or offering for sale sportswear products, including but not

limited to the pullover depicted herein, that includes heat management material that embodies the

patented invention disclosed in the ’119 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271.


manufacture, import, use, induce others to use, sell and/or offer for sale any product with heat

management material covered by the ’119 Patent and its conduct is, in every instance, without

Columbia Sportswear’s consent.


use its infringing products unless enjoined by this Court.

60. Due to Team Ortho’s infringement of the ‘119 Patent, Columbia Sportswear is

entitled to recover from Team Ortho the damages it has sustained as a result of Team Ortho’s

wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, but in no event less than a reasonable

royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

61. Due to Team Ortho’s infringement of the ‘119 Patent, Columbia Sportswear has





18/81

- 18 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3


COUNT IV –


PATENT 8,453,270



63. Team Ortho has been, and presently is, infringing the ’270 Patent, literally or

under the doctrine of equivalents, within this judicial district by manufacturing, importing, using,

inducing others to use, selling and/or offering for sale sportswear products, including but not

limited to the pullover depicted herein, that includes heat management material that embodies the

patented invention disclosed in the ’270 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271.


manufacture, import, use, induce others to use, sell and/or offer for sale any product with heat

management material covered by the ’270 Patent and its conduct is, in every instance, without

Columbia Sportswear’s consent.


use its infringing products unless enjoined by this Court.

66. Due to Team Ortho’s infringement of the ‘270 Patent, Columbia Sportswear is

entitled to recover from Team Ortho the damages it has sustained as a result of Team Ortho’s

wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, but in no event less than a reasonable

royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

67. Due to Team Ortho’s infringement of the ‘270 Patent, Columbia Sportswear has






19/81

- 19 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

COUNT V –

COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT,

PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. §§ 106 and 501

68.

Columbia Sportswear restates and realleges each of the allegations, photographs


69. Team Ortho has infringed the Columbia Sportswear Copyrights within this

judicial district by reproducing, distributing, and publicly displaying marketing and promotional

material comprised of or incorporating works in which Columbia Sportswear owns certain

copyright rights, without the permission of Columbia Sportswear, in violation of 17 U.S.C. §§

106 and 501.

70. On information and belief, Team Ortho’s acts of copyright infringement are

willful, intentional and purposeful, in disregard of and with indifference to Columbia

Sportswear’s rights.

71. As a direct and proximate result of Team Ortho’s infringement of the Columbia

Sportswear Copyrights, Columbia Sportswear is entitled to damages in an amount to be proven

at trial.

72. Columbia Sportswear is also entitled to Team Ortho’s profits attributable to the

infringement, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(b), including an accounting of and a constructive trust

with respect to such profits.

73. Team Ortho will continue to reproduce, distribute, and publicly display marketing

and promotional material comprised of or incorporating works in which Columbia Sportswear

owns certain copyright rights unless enjoined by this Court.

74.

Due to Team Ortho’s infringement of the Columbia Sportswear Copyrights,

Columbia Sportswear has suffered, is suffering, and will continue to suffer irreparable injury and

damage for which Columbia Sportswear has no adequate remedy at law. Columbia Sportswear

is therefore entitled to a permanent injunction against Team Ortho’s further infringing conduct.



20/81

- 20 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

COUNT VI –

TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT, UNFAIR COMPETITION AND FALSE

DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN,

PURSUANT TO THE LANHAM ACT, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)



76. Team Ortho’s use of a silver dot lining on and in connection with its products,

including but not limited to the pullover depicted herein, is likely to cause confusion, or to cause

mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of Team Ortho or its

products with the Columbia Sportswear Group or products sold under the COLUMBIA® brand,

or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of Team Ortho’s products by the Columbia

Sportswear Group, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

77. To any ordinary observer, and to sportswear consumers and members of the

industry, the “look” of the Team Ortho sportswear is confusingly similar to Columbia

Sportswear’s Silver Dot Trade Dress and, in particular, the ornamental, distinctive appearance of

the Omni-Heat heat reflective material, including its evenly-distributed, small silver dot pattern,

which is unique in appearance, eye-catching and readily recognized among customers and

members of the industry.

78. Team Ortho’s past, present and future use, distribution, sale and/or offer for sale

of sportswear using material confusingly similar to the Silver Dot Trade Dress, including but not

limited to the infringing pullover depicted herein, constitutes trade dress infringement, unfair

competition and false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

79.

On information and belief, Team Ortho has been aware of Columbia Sportswear’s

Omni-Heat products and the Silver Dot Trade Dress based on its exact copying of the Columbia

Sportswear Group’s Omni-Heat promotional materials, including the exact copying of technical

graphic and verbatim recital of language describing the features of Columbia Sportswear’s



21/81

- 21 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

Omni-Heat products and the distinctive Omni-Heat “look,” i.e., little silver dots. As such, Team

Ortho’s infringing activities have been and continue to be willful and deliberate.

80. Due to Team Ortho’s willful trade dress infringement, unfair competition and

false designation of origin, Columbia Sportswear is entitled to recover damages from Team

Ortho in an amount to be determined at trial, including Team Ortho’s profits and three times the

amount of actual damages sustained by Columbia Sportswear, together with costs and reasonable

attorneys’ fees.

81. Furthermore, by these acts, Team Ortho has irreparably injured Columbia

Sportswear and caused Columbia Sportswear to suffer a loss of goodwill and reputation, and

such injury will continue unless Team Ortho’s activities are enjoined by this Court.

82. By reason of the above actions, Columbia Sportswear is entitled to a range of

relief under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1116-1118.

COUNT VII –

VIOLATION OF THE UNIFORM DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT,

PURSUANT TO 815 ILCS §§ 510/1 et seq.



84. Team Ortho has made, used, exported, imported, marketed, sold and/or offered

for sale sportswear products, including but not limited to the pullover depicted herein, using the

Silver Dot Trade Dress without permission, authority or license from Columbia Sportswear, in a

manner that causes likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding as to the source, sponsorship,

approval, affiliation, connection, or association and/or certification of such products as set forth

in 85 ILCS 510/2.

85. Such actions on the part of Team Ortho, particularly in conjunction with its

infringement of the Columbia Sportswear Copyrights, are likely to cause confusion or mistake,

or to deceive the sportswear-purchasing public as to the affiliation, connection, or association of

Team Ortho or its products with Columbia Sportswear or its products, or as to the origin,



22/81

- 22 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

sponsorship, or approval of Team Ortho’s products by Columbia Sportswear, as set forth in 815

ILCS 510/2

86. Team Ortho’s deceptive trade practices as set forth above constitute violations of

the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 815 ILCS 510/1 et seq., and have caused and, unless

restrained by the Court, will continue to cause irreparable harm to Columbia Sportswear.

87. On information and belief, Team Ortho’s deceptive trade practices as set forth

above are willful, intentional and purposeful, in disregard of and with indifference to Columbia

Sportswear’s rights. Accordingly, Columbia Sportswear is entitled to recover damages from

Team Ortho in an amount to be determined at trial, together with costs and reasonable attorneys’

fees.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Columbia Sportswear respectfully requests that the Court enter

judgment in its favor against Defendant Team Ortho, granting the following relief:

A. A judgment and declaration that Team Ortho has infringed the Columbia

Sportswear Patents literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents;

B. A judgment and declaration that Team Ortho has infringed the Columbia

Sportswear Copyrights;

C. A judgment and declaration that Team Ortho has infringed the Silver Dot Trade

Dress and has engaged in unfair competition and false designations of origin;

D. A judgment and declaration that Team Ortho has violated the Uniform

Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 815 ILCS 510/1 et seq.

E. A permanent injunction, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283, enjoining Team Ortho and

its agents, servants, officers, directors, employees, affiliated entities and all persons acting in

concert or privity with them, from infringing each of the Columbia Sportswear Patents;

F. A permanent injunction, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 502, enjoining Team Ortho and

its agents, servants, officers, directors, employees, affiliated entities and all persons acting in

concert or privity with them, from infringing each of the Columbia Sportswear Copyrights;



23/81

- 23 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

G. A permanent injunction, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a), enjoining Team Ortho

and its agents, servants, officers, directors, employees, affiliated entities and all persons acting in

concert or privity with them, from infringing the Silver Dot Trade Dress, and from engaging in

unfair competition and false designations of origin;

H. A judgment and order requiring Team Ortho to pay Columbia Sportswear all

damages caused by Team Ortho’s infringement of each of the Columbia Sportswear Patents (but

in no event less than a reasonable royalty) pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284; or, with respect to the

‘529 Patent and the ‘435 Patent, the total profits made by Team Ortho from its infringement of

such patents pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289;

I.

A judgment and order requiring Team Ortho to pay Columbia Sportswear all

damages suffered by Columbia Sportswear and any additional profits of Team Ortho resulting

from Team Ortho’s infringement of each of the Columbia Sportswear Copyrights pursuant to

17 U.S.C. § 504(b), or statutory damages as provided in 17 U.S.C. § 504(c);

J. A judgment and order requiring Team Ortho to pay Columbia Sportswear all

damages suffered by Columbia Sportswear as a result of Team Ortho’s infringement of the Silver

Dot Trade Dress, unfair competition and false designations of origin pursuant to 15 U.S.C.

§ 1117(a);

K. A judgment and order requiring Team Ortho to pay Columbia Sportswear any

profits of Team Ortho attributable to its infringement of the Silver Dot Trade Dress, unfair

competition and false designations of origin pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a);

L. A judgment and order requiring Team Ortho to pay Columbia Sportswear

supplemental damages or profits for any continuing post-verdict infringement up until the entry

of a final judgment, with an accounting, if needed;

M. A judgment and order requiring Team Ortho to pay Columbia Sportswear

increased damages up to three times the amount found or assessed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;

N. A judgment and order requiring Team Ortho to pay Columbia Sportswear pre-

judgment and post-judgment interest on any damages or profits awarded;



24/81

- 24 -PDX\106477\213683\DZN\17457279.3

O. A determination that this action is an exceptional case pursuant to 35 U.S.C.

§ 285;

P. A determination that this action is an exceptional case pursuant to 15 U.S.C.

§ 1117(a);

Q. An award of Columbia Sportswear’s attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses

incurred in bringing and prosecuting this action, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, 17 U.S.C. § 505,

and 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a);

R. An award of Columbia Sportswear’s attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses

incurred in bringing and prosecuting this action, pursuant to 815 ILCS 510/3;

S.

A judgment and order impounding all infringing articles pursuant to 17 U.S.C.

§ 503;

T. An order that Team Ortho deliver for destruction all articles infringing the

Silver Dot Trade Dress and all means of making the same, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1118; and

U. Such other and additional relief as this Court deems just and proper.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(b), Columbia Sportswear respectfully requests a trial by

jury of all issues so triable.

Dated this 25th day of January, 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: s/Matthew A. WerberMatthew A. Werber (Bar No. IL 6287658)131 South Dearborn Street, Suite 2400

Chicago, IL 60603-5577Telephone: 312.460.5000Facsimile: 312.460.7000Email: [email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Columbia Sportswear

North America, Inc.



25/81

Case: 1:16-cv-01052 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:25

EXHIBIT 1


26/81

c12)

United States Design Patent

Blackford

(54) PATTERNED HEAT REFLECTIVE

MATERIAL

(75) Inventor: Woody Blackford, Portland,

OR

(US)

(73) Assignee: Columbia Sportswear North America,

Inc., Portland,

OR

(US)

(**) Term: 14 Years

(21) Appl. No.: 29/336,730

(22) Filed:

May

7, 2009

(51) LOC (9) Cl.

..................................................

29-03

(52) U.S. Cl. ................................................... D29/101.1

(58) Field of Classification Search

.................

D29/100,

D29/101.1, 101.2, 101.3, 101.4; D5/57,

D5/60, 61, 99, 53; 2/81, 82, 458, 400; 428/131,

428/69; D24/189; 427/149; D6/574-595;

4/657; D23/309; D30/161; 52/177

See application file for complete search history.

(56) References Cited

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

3,577,305 A 5/1971 Hines

eta .

4,420,521 A 12/1983 Carr

4,525,406 A 6/1985 Pollock

4,569,874 A 2/1986 Kuznetz

4,765,323 A 8/1988

Poettgen

4,856,294 A 8/1989 Scaringe et a .

D358,734

s

*

5/1995 Paskwi etz et a . ............. D6/582

5,415,222 A 5/1995 Colvin

D404,236 S

*

111999 Bergwall et a . ............... D6/582

D413,731

s

*

9/1999 Hannington ..................... D5/61

D414,252 S

*

9/1999 Orr .............................. D23/309

D428,293 s

*

7/2000 Williams ....................... D6/583

6,319,599 B1 1112001 Buckley

6,341,384 B1 112002 Hayes

6,427,242 B1 8/2002 Bush

eta .

D472,419 S

*

4/2003 Robbins, III ................... D6/5 82

D477,743 s

*

7/2003 dePauw ........................ D6/582

6,591,560 B2

*

7/2003 Burke et al. . .................. 52/177

D478,494 S

*

8/2003 Arnold ........................... D8/107

D478,761 s

*

8/2003 Robbins, III ................... D6/5 82

DE

USOOD650529S

(10) Patent No.: US D650,529 S

(45) Date of Patent:

**

*Dec. 13, 2011

D483,187 S

6,687,913 B2 *

6,743,498 B2 *

6,811,852 B2 *

12/2003 Cheng

2/2004 Aldridge ............................. 2/81

6/2004 Fourmeux ..................... 428/131

1112004 Alde rman ............ ........... 428/69

(Continued)

FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS

9409799 4/1995

(Continued)

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

Castelli Insolito Radiation Jacket-3 Season Cycling Jacket; www.

feedthehabit.com/road-biking/castelli-insolito-radiation-jacket-3-

season-cycling-jacket/; Sep. 19, 2008.

(Continued)

Primary Examiner- Susan Bennett Hattan

Assistant

Examiner-

Barbara B Lohr

(74)

Attorney, Agent, or

i rm Schwabe, Williamson

&

Wyatt, P.C.

(57)

CLAIM

I claim the ornamental design of a patterned heat reflective

material, as shown and described.

DESCRIPTION

FIG.

1

is a perspective view of a patterned heat reflective

material, showing

my

new design;

FIG.

2 is an enlarged sectional view taken in the direction

of

line 2-2 on FIG.

4;

FIG. 3 is a front view of a jacket having the patterned heat

reflective material as shown in FIG.

1;

and,

FIG. 4 is a front view

of

a swatch

of

a patterned heat reflective

material as shown in FIG.

1.

The dashed lines in FIG. 3 are included for illustrating envi

ronmental structure and the dashed lines in FIG. 4 depict the

boundaries of he claimed design, all dashed lines forming no

part of the claimed design.

1 Claim, 3 Drawing Sheets

Exhibit 1Page 1 of 5



27/81

US D650,529 S

Page 2


JP

JP

JP

KR

wo

wo

wo

63-125525

63-139147

2004338169

8/1988

9/1988

6,855,410 B2 2/2005

D508,180 S

*

8/2005

6,934,985 B2 8/2005

6,978,481 B2 * 12/2005

D518,248 S

*

3/2006

7,013,496 B2

*

3/2006

D548,400 S

*

8/2007

D583,569 S

*

12/2008

7,465,484 B2 * 12/2008

D590,949 S

*

4/2009

D596,860 S

*

7/2009

7,581,260 B2 * 9/2009

7,854,017 B2 * 12/2010

D630,442 S

*

112011

D631,670 S

*

212011

Buckley

Sneed D6/582

Sanders

Mordecai et

a .

................... 2/81

Northrop D30/161

Dunn ................................ 2/458

Boord . D29/101.1

Claudat . D5/53

Handwerker ................... 428/72

Broyles . D24/189

Doughty . D5/57

Underwood eta . ............... 2/82

Laton .................................. 2/81

Sichel D5/60

Jackson D5/99

30560581

DM/064488

DM/064044

DM/067876

12/2004

5/2010

5/2003

7/2003

5/2006

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

Castelli Radiation Jacket; www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/archive/tech/

322662/castelli-radiation-jacket-300.html; Mar. 10, 2009

Quelle Catalog: RU, Jacket Advertisement, 2005 .

2004/0128747

A1

7/2004 Bumbarger et

a .

Sunmore, Poe Yoga Mat, Sporting Goods Buyers' Guide, Spring

2008.


GB 2294426 5/1996

GB 2414960 12/2005

YPCYC Catalog, Kompendium: Sportmode, kettenwirk-praxis,

Obertshausen, 2006.

* cited by examiner




28/81

U.S. Patent

Dec. 13, 2011 Sheet 1

of

3 US D650,529 S

FIG. 1

Vllzzzzzzzzi2zzz2/zzzzzzzzzl>zz llzzzj

FIG. 2




29/81

U.S. Patent

I

I

"

I

1..----J

Dec. 13, 2011 Sheet 2 of 3

- '\

-

'

..., ,,

\

i

..,. _ _

.,..

I

I

---

I

-----'

FIG. 3

I

US D650,529 S

'

\

I

I

---

I

..1




30/81

U.S. Patent Dec. 13, 2011 Sheet 3 of 3 US D650,529 S

ro-o-

o-

o

e-o-o-

o-

o- o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

-o -o,

0000000000000000000000000000

ooooeooooooooooooeooooooooooo

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

ooooeoooooooooooooooooooooooo

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

2

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

+

00000000000000000000000000000

'

0000000000000000000000000000

cooccoocooooocccoococcooooooo

' 0000000000000000000000000000

2

+

' 00000000000000000000000000000 '

L - - - ~ . . o ~ ~ ~ E P c P ~ ~ ~ o ~ ? r c ? o ? ~ e ? o

o

k

~ ~ ? ~ ? c ? o u_ j

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

ooocococoooooococoooocooooooo

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000

..1

FIG. 4




31/81


EXHIBIT 2


32/81

c12) United States Design Patent

Blackford

(54) HEAT REFLECTIVE MATERIAL WITH

PATTERN

(75) Inventor: Michael E. Woody Blackford,

Portland, OR (US)

(73) Assignee: Columbia Sportswear North America,

Inc., Portland, OR (US)

(**) Term: 14 Years

(21) Appl. No.: 29/360,364

(22) Filed: Apr. 23, 2010

Related U.S. Application Data

(63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 29/336,730,

filed on May 7, 2009, now Pat. No. Des. 650,529.

(51) LOC (9) Cl.

..................................................

29-02

(52) U.S. Cl.

...................................................

D29/101.1

(58) Field of Classification Search

.................

D29/100,

D29/101.1, 101.2, 101.3, 101.4, 101.5, 124,

D29/125, 126, 129, 130; D5/57, 60, 61,

D5/99; 2/81, 82, 458; 428/131

See application file for complete search history.

(56) References Cited


D92,994 S

D107,621 S

D118,109 S

D119,351 S

D129,870 S

D130,877 S

2,471,008 A

D154,151 S

D158,550 S

D169,305 S *

3,418,668 A

3,577,305 A

3,663,182 A

3,800,364 A

3,849,802 A

3,917,785 A

3,924,929 A

3,934,065 A

'

I

I

\

\

'

....

...

511934 Aaronson

1211937 Stiglitz

1211939 Callahan

511940 Katz

1011941 Maisch

1211941 Tips

411946 Pretty

611949 Ryan

511950 Breneman

411953

DeGrazia

................. D291101.4

1211968 Anderson

511971 Hines eta .

511972 Hamling

411974 Kalwaites

1111974 Govaars

111197 5 Kalwaites

1211975 Holmen eta .

111976 Tung

...

-

____

..............

-----

...... _

- - - - ~ I

\ - - - - - - 1

,pi

~ = = = = = = = = = ~ '

USOOD670435S

(10)

Patent No.: US D670,435 S

**

Nov. 6, 2012

45)

Date of Patent:

4,032,681 A

4,211,261 A

4,395,455 A

4,420,521 A

4,435,442 A

4,463,464 A

4,483,021 A

4,525,406 A

4,569,088 A

4,569,874 A

4,622,253 A

4,637,947 A

4,712,609 A

4,765,323 A

4,798,754 A

4,856,294 A

5,098,795 A

5,366,785 A

D358,734 s

5,415,222 A

5,520,778 A

D404,236 S

D413,731 S

D414,252 S

D414,642 S

D428,293 S

6,191,056 B1

6,242,369 B1

6,319,599 B1

6,321,386 B1

6,341,384

B1

6,427,242 B1

6,511,929

B1

D472,419 S

D477,743 S

6,589,631

B1

6,591,560 B2

D478,494 S

D478,761 S

6,687,913 B2 *

6,743,498 B2 *

D497,072 S

6,811,852 B2

6,824,819 B2

6,855,410 B2

6,858,068 B2

6,874,336 B2

D508,180 S

6,934,985 B2

6,978,481 B2 *

D518,248 S

7,013,496 B2 *

7,226,879 B2

611977 Jonnes

711980 Mehta et al.

711983 Frankosky

1211983 Carr

311984 Hefele

811984 Bost et al.

1111984 McCall

611985 Pollock

211986 Frankenburg eta .

211986 Kuznetz

1111986 Levy

111987 Maekawa eta .

1211987 Iversen

811988

Poettgen

111989

Tomek

811989

Scaringe eta .

311992 Webb eta .

1111994 Sawdai

511995 Paskwietz eta .

511995 Colvin

511996 Sawdai

111999 Bergwall et al.

911999 Hannington

911999 Orr

1011999 Williams

712000 Williams

212001

Vogt et a .

612001

Vogt et a .

1112001 Buckley

1112001

Monica

112002 Hayes

812002

Bush et a .

112003 Vogt et

a .

412003 Robbins, III

712003 dePauw

712003 Suzuki et

a .

712003 Burke, III eta .

812003 Arnold

812003 Robbins, III

212004 Aldridge ............................. 2181

612004 Fourmeux ..................... 4281131

1012004 Suero, Jr.

1112004 Alderman

1112004 Vogt et a .

212005 Buckley

212005 Smith eta .

412005 Yarborough eta .

812005 Sneed

812005

Sanders

1212005 Mordecai eta . ................... 2181

312006 Northrop

312006 Dunn ................................ 21458

612007 Tilton et

a .




33/81

US D670,435 S

Page 2

D548,400 S

D551,407 S

7,399,919 B2

D583,569 S

D583,999 S *

7,465,484 B2

D590,949 S

D596,860 S

D598,166 S *

7,581,260 B2 *

D613,948 S

D628,005 S

7,854,017 B2 *

D630,442 S

D631,262 S

D631,670 S *

D637,008 S

D638,224 S

2003/0027476 A1

2004/0128747 A1

2004/0261465 A1

2005/0077618 A1

2005/0209663

A1

2005/0251900

A1

2005/0252036

A1

2007/0037034

A1

2007/0129767

A1

2007/0267583

A1

2007/0267595

A1

2007/0277806 A1

2008/0099188

A1

2008/0251062 A1

2008/0257333 A1

2008/0282455 A1

2008/0283038 A1

2009/0000610 A1

2009/0209155

A1

2009/0258180 A1

2010/0020056

A1

2010/0071119

A1

2010/0107657

A1

2010/0138983

A1

2010/0282433

A1

2010/0326710 A1

201110036282

A1

201110107771 A1

201110135899 A1

201110138523 A1

201110160691 A1

201110203783 A1

201110214221 A1

8/2007

9/2007

7/2008

12/2008

12/2008

12/2008

4/2009

7/2009

8/2009

9/2009

4/2010

1112010

12/2010

112011

112011

212011

5/2011

5/2011

2/2003

7/2004

12/2004

4/2005

9/2005

1112005

1112005

2/2007

6/2007

1112007

1112007

12/2007

5/2008

10/2008

10/2008

1112008

1112008

112009

8/2009

10/2009

112010

3/2010

5/2010

6/2010

1112010

12/2010

212011

5/2011

6/2011

6/2011

6/2011

8/2011

9/2011

Boord

Caruso eta .

McCutcheon et al.

Claudat

Middlebrooks . D29/101.4

Handwerker

Broyles

Doughty

Kemper D29/101.4

Underwood

eta .

............... 2/82

Spritzer

Chapman et

a .

Laton .................................. 2/81

Sichel

Evans

Jackson

Frost

Ko eta .

Vogt eta .

Bumbarger et a .

Yarborough eta .

McCutcheon et al.

Hamilton et

a .

Harlacker

Laska

Fisher

eta .

Wahl strand

Dodo

Dodo

Dodo

Touzov

Dodo

Dodo et al.

Jones et al.

Dodo

Dodo

Goulet

Goulet

LeRoy eta .

Thatcher

Vistakula

Kim

Blackford

Zhang

Cote

Crist eta .

Meltzer eta .

Layson, Jr. et

a .

Ng

eta .

Blackford et a .

Munda

D5/99


DE

GB

GB

JP

JP

JP

JP

KR

wo

wo

wo

wo

9409799

2294426

2414960

63-125525

63-139147

204402/2004

2004338169

30560581

DM/064488

DM/064044

2006030254

DM/067876

4/1995

5/1996

12/2005

8/1988

9/1988

7/2004

12/2004

5/2010

5/2003

7/2003

3/2006

5/2006

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

QueUe Catalog: RU, Jacket Advertisement, 2005.

Sunmore, Poe Yoga Mat, Sporting Goods Buyers' Guide, Spring

2008.

YPCYC Catalog, Kompendium: Sportmode, kettenwirk-praxis,

Obertshausen, 2006.

Castelli Insolito Radiation Jacket-3 Season Cycling Jacket; www.

feedthehabit.corn/road-biking/castelli-insolito-radiation-jacket-3-

season-cycling-jacket/; Sep. 19, 2008.

Castelli Radiation Jacket; www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/archive/tech/

322662/castelli-radiation-jacket-300.html; Mar. 10, 2009.

* cited by examiner

Primary Examiner- Susan Bennet Hattan

Assistant

Examiner-

Barbara B Lohr

(74) Attorney, Agent, or i rm Schwabe, Williamson

&

Wyatt, P.C.

(57)

CLAIM

The ornamental design for a heat reflective material with

pattern, as shown and described.

DESCRIPTION

FIG.

1

is a top view

of

he heat reflective material w ith pattern

shown in use as

on

a jacket;

FIG. 2 is a front view of the claimed design of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a bottom view

of

the claimed design

of

FIG.

1;

FIG. 4 is a back view of the claimed design of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a right side view of the claimed design of FIG.

1;

FIG. 6 is a left side view of the claimed design

of

FIG. 1;

FIG. 7 is a right side view of the heat reflective material with

pattern shown

in

use as on a boot;

FIG. 8 is a front view of the claimed design as shown in FIG.

7;

FIG. 9 is a back view

of

the claimed design as shown

in

FIG.

7;

FIG. 10 is a right side view

of

he claimed design as shown in

FIG. 7;

FIG.

11

is a top view of the claimed design as shown in FIG.

7;

FIG. 12 is a bottom view of the claimed design as shown in

FIG.

7;

FIG. 13 is a right side view of he heat reflective material with

pattern shown in use as on a glove;

FIG. 14 is a left side view of the claimed design as shown in

FIG.13;

FIG.

15

is a bottom view

of

the claimed design as shown in

FIG.13;

FIG. 16 is a top view of the claimed design as shown in FIG.

13;

FIG. 17 is a back view of he claimed design as shown in FIG.

13;

FIG. 18 is a front view of he claimed design as shown in FIG.

13;

FIG. 19 is a front view of the heat reflective material wi th

pattern shown in use as on a hat;


FIG. 19;

FIG. 21 is a left side view of the claimed design as shown in

FIG. 19;


of


FIG.

19;


19;

FIG.

24

is a back view of he claimed design as shown in FIG.

19;

FIG.

25

is a front view of the heat reflective material wi th

pattern shown in use as on pants;

FIG. 26 is a back view

of

he claimed design as shown in FIG.

25;


FIG. 25;


25;

FIG. 29 is a right side view of he claimed design as shown in

FIG. 25;




34/81

US D670,435 S

Page 3

FIG.

30

is a left side view

of


FIG.

25;

FIG.

31

is a left side view

of

the heat reflective material with

pattern shown in use as on a sock;

FIG.

32

is a front view

of


31;


31;


of


FIG.

31;

FIG.

35

is a back view

of


31;

FIG.

36

is a bottom view

of


FIG.

31;

FIG. 37 is a front view

of

the heat reflective material with

pattern shown in use as on a sleeping bag.

FIG. 38 is a back view of he claimed design as shown in FIG.

37;

FIG.

39

is a top view of the claimed design as shown in FIG.

37;

FIG.

40

is a right side view

of


FIG. 37;

FIG. 41 is a left side view

of


FIG.

37;

FIG.

42

is a bottom view of the claimed design as shown in

FIG.

37;

FIG. 43 is a left side view of he heat reflective material with

pattern shown in use as on a boot;

FIG.

44

is a top view

of

the claimed design as shown in FIG.

43;

FIG.

45

is a bottom view of the claimed design

as

shown in

FIG. 43;

FIG. 46 is a right side view of he claimed design as shown in

FIG. 43;

FIG.

47

is a back view

of


43; and,

FIG. 48 is a front view of he claimed design as shown in FIG.

43.

The dashed lines are included for illustrating environmental

structure and form no part of the claimed design.

1 Claim, 15 Drawing Sheets




35/81

U.S. Patent

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

i

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

#, . . .... ""' ........

,

,

I

I

I

I

I

I

Nov. 6, 2012

______ ..

I

/

---,

I

I

I I

I

I

i , /

I "

' - - - - - ~ '

Sheet 1

of

15

1

r-- - -

\r J

. . :o::::::::::J

'

...

__ ... __ _

- ......

,

,

"

---

l------

1

I I

\ I

I

" I

......

'

... _____ ,

US D670,435 S

FIG. 1

FIG. 2

FIG. 3




36/81

U.S. Patent Nov. 6, 2012 Sheet 2

of

15

US D670,435 S

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

'

,,

.,.,.'""'

__

.... ________ _

......................

...

'

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

~ r ~ r ~ ~ r J

:

..___________ ,./ \ ~

I - - - -

J

- - - -

I

-..

I

\ I

'

'

I

\

I

I

'

I

I

;

'

'

...

'

I

I

I

"

'

,

I

I

f I

I

, I I

I

I

I I

I

I

'

I

I

I

I'

'

(

'

I

I

i

'

I

I

I I

I

I I

I

I

I

I I

I

I

I I

I

I

I I

I

I

I I

I

I

I I

I

I

I I

I

I

I I

I

I

,

l

I

I

I I

I

I

I I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I I

I

I

I I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I I

I

I I

J

I I

I

I

I I

II

I I

II

,,

I I

r'

,

I I

,,

II

I

I

I

,,

II I

I

I II

II

I

I

I I I

~ ~ ~ -

I

~ - - ~ ~

o

I

....

_______

......... f

--

........................

----

I

----

............

-

........

-

...

.... __ _;.,..

FIG. 5 FIG. 6

FIG. 4




37/81

U.S. Patent

'

'

I

I

'

Nov. 6, 2012

FIG.

8

'

'

\

I

'

Sheet 3

of

15

FIG. 7

FIG. 9

I

I

I

l

I

I

I

I

I

I

I I I

I I I

11 I \

t l I \

J I

I \

1 I

'-

/ I I

\I

I I 1

\I

I I I

11

I I

1

II

: \ I J)

1 I

------L _ _ _ _

I I

~ - r -

l

1

I I II

1...-:.L.::

:.::.::.::.::.::..-:..-_..J:.

US D670,435 S




38/81


of

15

FIG. 10

"

'

.,..

.,.

......

FIG. 11

___ ....................... _

--

..........

;

--------------

/

.I

I

(

I

\

'

'

.......

......

_......

__

...

-- ....- .............. _. ....

US D670,435 S

FIG. 12

_____

_,_,.. . . , __ _

..,..----rr 1-rr; __

__

___ ___

_

.,..,.,"".,.,.("I I I I I I I I I

)....,_r::;--t:.------:,--.....,

,..

, . ' I

I I I I I I I I I I I I 1

.....

,,

/'_,t' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / 1 ' ~ '

1 /11111111/11111 1 1

\\

//1 I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

:

1

\ \

1

/ f / / / / f f / / 1 I 1\

\ l l f l l /111111111111/

1

:,

\ \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1

1

I

\ '


39/81

U.S. Patent Nov. 6, 2012 Sheet 5 of 15 US D670,435 S

FIG. 13

FIG. 17

FIG. 15

FIG. 16

\ \ - I ,_.

\

I \ I - I

1 I I

I '

1

' ...

_ . , > - , . . _ , . , 1 \ . . . . _ _ A . _ ; , ; , . '




40/81

U.S. Patent Nov. 6, 2012 Sheet 6 of 15 US

D670,435

S

FIG. 19

FIG. 20

FIG. 21




41/81

U.S. Patent Nov. 6, 2012 Sheet 7 of 15 US D670,435 S

FIG. 22

,.------ ...... ...., __

, #

-

, ,. '

'

, '

"'

,.

'

,

;

'

,

..

'

I I

\

I I

\

I I

\

I I

\

I

\

I \

FIG. 23

FIG. 24




42/81

U.S. Patent Nov. 6, 2012

FIG. 25

T -

1

I

I

I

;I

;I

;I

I I

I I

I I

I i

I I

I I

I I

I I

I i

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I i

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

FIG. 27

Sheet 8

of

15

US D670,435 S

FIG. 26

~ - - r - - - ~

---------·

_____ ... __

II

I I

II

I I

l I

I i

I I

I I

I I

I I

I i

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

---------·

______ ....

I I

I I

j i

I I

I I

I I

I I

~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~

FIG. 28




43/81


FIG. 29

I

I

I

I

I

'

I

'

'

'

'

I

I

'

'

'

'

I I

I

I

I

I

'

' '

---- '1

\

- - - - -1

' '

' '

..............-

I

'

'

'

'

I

'

I

'

I

I

I

l

I

'

'

'

'

'

I

I

'

I

'

'

I

I

I

'

'

I

I

I

'

'

'

'

I

I I

'

:

'

I

t___________ J

Sheet 9

of

15

US D670,435 S

FIG. 30

~ - - -

0 ' I

B

..,1,

'

'

I I /

r----

,

:----- ,/,/ /

/

i "",.."

I

6

. - . - .

I

I f

I

I

I I

I I

'

'

I

I I

' '

I

I I

I I

'

I

I

I

'

'

'

I

I I

I I

i

I

I I

I I

I I

; I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I

I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

i

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

J




44/81

U.S. Patent

I

I

I

i

I

I

Nov. 6, 2012 Sheet 10

of

15

FIG.

31

I

' - - - - - - - - - ~

I '

'

i

',

i \

I I

\ I

\

I

\

I

'

;

' ' - - - ~ - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - ; #

US D670,435 S

FIG. 32

'

I

I

I

I

;

\

\

...

.....

I

I

i

i

I

I

f - - - -

,"" .... ,

I I '1.

I I \

I I \

I I I

I I

\

I

'-.

I

'-- ............ - ''

FIG. 33




45/81


FIG. 34

..,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -

Sheet 11

of

15

I

"

'

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

, '

I

I I

I I

I I

\

I

\ I

\

,

' ,

' - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - - '

~

t9

~

~

"'o..,

1111.

)I

I

I I

I I

I I

I I

i I

i I

I

i

I I

l I

I I

I I

I I

\

I

\ I

' '

" '

................ _..-.,.

.,.-------------

"

I

1

I

\

\

\

...

' ....

-------------

· · ~ ~ ~

US D670,435 S

FIG. 35

FIG. 36




46/81


of

15 US D670,435 S

FIG. 37

,

..

I \

I

\

I

\

I \

I "

I

'

I

\

/ \

/

'

FIG. 38 ,,' \

\

'

~ , ~ ' ~

_

,

\

--------------------------------- \

l:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::j

~ ~

FIG. 39




47/81


\

\

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

Sheet 13

of

15

FIG. 40

L_______________________ )

US D670,435 S

FIG.

41

r - - ~ ~ ~ - - ~ - - ~ - - - - ~ - - ~ - - - - - ~ ~ - - - ~ - - - - - ~ - - - - - ~ - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - , ,

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

t_____________________________________________________________ ;

FIG. 42




48/81


of

15

US D670,435 S

r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~

I I

I I

i I

I I

I I

I I

i I

I

I I

I I

I

I

I I

I I

I

I

I I

I I

I I

l

t

FIG. 43

I I

I I

I I

I I

I l

I

I

\

,,'

\

~ ~ ~ ' \

--#

\

--------- I

I

I'

I

f I

I

I

I

\ -------------------11

..............._ ..... ---

'

.....

, - - . ._ - - ~ -

- ~ - - - - - - ~

I

- -------- - - ~ I

'--- ...................---- l - - - - - - - - - - - ~

FIG. 44

FIG. 45

~ ~ ~ : : ~ ; ~ ~ r r ; ~ ~ ~ - , - - _ _

___

_

.,...-_

_.,..I

I I I I I I I I) ' . . . . ,_ ---- IC--------..,

, / 'A

I I I I I

I

I I I I I I

I

r 1 II ' ' - . '

,/,_.('

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / I II

.._''\

'1'1111111111111111

I

II

'-\

/ / '

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I : II \1

(

1

/ f f / J / f / f f / f f /1 I

1:

1

\

1

1

,1

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II

1

1

II It

\ \ I

I I

I

I I

I

I I I

I

I I I I I I

II J l

\

-< I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II t l

' - . ' t -1

I I I I I I I I I I I --- II ;

I

.... ,-_'4


49/81


of

15

US D670,435 S

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I i

I I

l I

I I

I I

I I

\ I

I

I

I I

I

I

I I

\ I

FIG. 46

I l

I I

I I

i \

I \

I \

I

'

I '

I ,

I

'

I

,,

,

_ _

I

- - - - - - - -

1 - ,

I ~

I \

I I

\--

~

I -- ..... -- ................ -

......

-----.---- _,...,""' J

~ ~ ~ - - ..... ---..... .....__

----

-.,.. '

t i

' ~ - - - - - - ~

.....

- - ~ - - - ~ -

~ ~ - - ~ ~ - - ~ - - - J - - - - - - ~ - ~ -

~ T ~

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

\ I

I I

\ I

I I

I I

\ I

I I

FIG. 4 7 \

I

I I

I I

I I

I l

I I

I I

I \

I \

I \

I I

:

I I

:

\

1\

I ' 1 ' ' - - - - - J . - - - - - ~ 1

I

1

J •II

).

1

1

I

l _ . . . " " : : : : . : : : : . : : : : : : : : : : : : : . " " " " . J ~

,--------------,

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

\ I

I I

I I

I 1

\ i

FIG. 48

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I - - - - - ....

....,.

\

I .., , I

I " " I

1/'

I

I 1

( ~ - - - - - - . . . . \\

I ' ,#------..,

',,

I , ~ , '

, '\I

i

, ' '

[_____________




50/81


EXHIBIT 3


51/81


52/81

US 8,424,119 B2

Page 2


2007/0267595 AI* 1Jn 007 Dodo .............................. 252/67

3,577,305 A

3,663,182 A *

3,849,802 A •

4,032,68 1 A •

4,21 1,261 A *

4,395,455 A •

4,420,52 1 A

4,435,442 A *

4,463,464 A •

4,483,021 A •

4,525,406 A

4,569,088 A *

4,569,874 A

4,622,253 A •

4,637,947 A •

4,712,609 A •

4,765,323 A

4,856,294 A

4,912,778 A

5,098,795 A •

5,207,852 A

5,415,222 A

5,860,163 A

6,009,560 A

6, 110,558 A

6, 191,056 Bl •

6,242,369 Bl •

6,319,599 Bl

6,321,386 8 1 •

6,341,384

81*

6,421,242

Bl

6,511 ,929

B1

•

6,59 1

,5

60 B2

6,824,819 B2 *

6,855,410 B2

6,858,o68

82.

6,874 ,336 B2 •

6,934,985

B2

7,399,919 B2*

7,452,833

B2

7,600,269 B2

7,739,749 82

2002/0073481 AI

2003/0027476 AI •

2004/0 128747 A1

2004/026 1465

AI*

2005/0009429 AI

2005/0077618 AI*

2005/0209663

A1*

2005/0251900 AI •

2005/0252036 A 1*

2006/005 1559 AI

2006/0130367 A I

2007/0037034

A1

*

2007/0129767

A1*

2007/0267583 AI*

51197 1 Hines el al.

511972 Hamling ....................... 44

2/

181

1 11974 Govaars .............................. 2/81

6/ 1977 Jonnes .......................... 442/317

7/ 1980 Mehta eta

..

............

139

/425 R

7/ 1983 Frnnkosky ........

..

....

..

.... 428/332

12

/ 1983 Carr

3/1984 Hefe1e .......................... 427/465

8/1984

Bostet

a

................. 297/452.61

I J/1984 McCall ....

..

........................... 2

columbia sportswear v. team ortho foundation - complaint

Documents