common core assessment selection work group may 10, 2013 oregon department of education

COMMON CORE ASSESSMENT SELECTION WORK GROUP

MAY 10, 2013OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

WELCOME

• Thank you for your work last week

• We’re making a high-stakes recommendation

What is at stake:Education of kids in Oregon

Including Oregon’s ability to provide an education system that is competitive nationally and internationally

OVERVIEW OF DAY

1:00-3:00 – Finish evaluating assessments against criteria.

3:00-4:00 – Roll up criteria-level evaluations into determination about best

assessment at the feature level. Then determine best assessment overall.

4:00-5:00 – Develop recommendation language for pitching the formal adoption of the

assessment by the State Board.

Agenda is on the table—let’s track time together.

REVIEW OF MAY 3RD

Objectives

I. Understand current assessment context and needs

II. Determine which assessments will be evaluated

III. Determine how to weight the features in the assessment evaluation

IV. Begin evaluating the Common Core assessments against the criteria

Outcomes• Reviewed all assessments against our requirements for the

new assessment and determined which assessments will be evaluated

• Determined how the core features of the assessment system should be weighted in the assessment evaluation

• Completed first evaluation of assessment for first two features and criteria.

ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATIONReceived information on new assessments.

Last week we reviewed all assessments against our requirements determined which assessments will be evaluated.

These assessments did not meet our basic requirements, so we have not brought that information here.

Received additional information on assessment and will provide that during evaluation.

Received new information on one assessment and will re-review that assessment against requirement (next slide).

6

Requirements

Aspire MAP PARCC SAT Smarter Balanced

STAR

Aligned to CCSS

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Available in reading, writing, and mathematics

Yes No, reading and math only

Yes Yes Yes No, reading and math only

Available at 3-8 and high school

Yes Yes Yes No, available at the high school level only

Yes Yes

Administrated online

Yes Yes Yes No, paper and pencil

Yes Yes

Comparable across multiple states

Yes Yes TBD – pending field test (2014) data

Yes TBD – pending pilot (2013) and field test (2014) data

Yes

Operational in 201415 academic year

Yes Yes TBD - timeline states Winter-Spring 2015

TBD – timeline states Spring 2015; pilot was administered on time in Spring 2013

REQUIREMENTS TABLE

OBJECTIVESMay 10th

I. Finish evaluating the Common Core assessments against the criteria

II. Determine best assessmentIII. Develop Common Core assessment

recommendation

FINISH EVALUATING THE COMMON CORE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE CRITERIA

OBJECTIVE I

EVALUATING:

PROCESS

1. Revisit criteria 1.1-1.4 and 2.1, 2.2

(25 min)

2. Evaluate assessments against criteria 3.1, 3.2

(20 min)

3. Evaluate assessments against criteria 4.1, 5.1

(20 min)

4. Recap of all reviews:

Rank top 2 assessments for each criteria

Select best assessment for each feature

(15 min)rap up

EVALUATION__20 MIN

Revisit criteria 1.1-1.4 and 2.1, 2.2

Hand out and notes:

Material from last week

Feature 1 and 2 New Information packet

Process

1. Individually review each feature and criteria (10 min)

2. Discuss (10 min)

3. Take notes/rank (5 min)

Evaluate assessments against criteria 3.1, 3.2

Hand out and notes:

Criteria 3.1 and 3.2 Fact Sheets

Assessment Evaluation Sheet: Feature 3

Process


2. Discuss (10 min)

3. Take notes/rank(5 min)

EVALUATION__20 MIN

Evaluate assessments against criteria 4.1, 5.1

Hand out and notes:

Criteria 4.1 and 5.1 Fact Sheets



Process


2. Discuss (10 min)

3. Take notes/rank (5 min)

EVALUATION__20 MIN

RECAP__15 MIN

Independently

1. Go back through and rank the top 2 assessments for each criteria

2. Select the best assessment for each feature

DETERMINE BEST ASSESSMENT

OBJECTIVE II

PROTOCOL FOR BUILDING AGREEMENT

1. Open discussion about best assessment

2. Temperature check about best assessment

3. Minority voice led discussion

4. Consensus

TIME OVERVIEW

Feature Time Estimate

1. Quality Assessment 13 minutes

2. Accommodations Available 11 minutes

3. Suite of Resources Available 11 minutes

4. Aligned with college and career 5 minutes

5. Oregon can contribute to content 5 minutes

QUALITY ASSESSMENT__13 MIN




4. Agreement

ACCOMMODATIONS AVAILABLE__11 MIN




4. Agreement

SUITE OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES __11 MIN




4. Agreement

ALIGNED WITH COLLEGE AND CAREER__13 MIN




4. Consensus

OREGON CAN CONTRIBUTE__13 MIN




4. Agreement

BEST ASSESSMENT

Feature % Best Assessment

1. Quality Assessment 33

2. Accommodations Available 22

3. Suite of Resources Available

28

4. Aligned with college and career

07

5. Oregon can contribute to content

10

BEST ASSESSMENT

Assessment %ASPIRE

MAP

PARCC

Smarter Balanced

COST OVERVIEW• Estimated costs of ASPIRE have not been determined at this point

• PARCC per student costs have not been updated since proposal

• Smarter Balanced and MAP costs updated Spring, 2013

Assessment FormativeCost/Student

InterimCost/Student

SummativeCost/Student

ASPIRE TBD TBD TBD

MAP– Basic n/a n/a $15-19

MAP– Suite of Resources Included Included Varies

PARCC – Basic n/a n/a $22

PARCC – Suite of Resources Included Included TBD

Smarter Balanced – Basic n/a n/a $22.5

Smarter Balanced – Suite of Resources Included Included $27.3

DEVELOP COMMON CORE ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATION

OBJECTIVE III

WHAT ODE WILL PROVIDE• Description of the requirements, feature, and criteria

• Description of the work group process

WHAT WE NEED FROM THE WORK GROUP

Articulate why this is the best assessment for Oregon students.

1. For each feature (5 min/feature)

Strengths for / reasons why this is the best assessment

2. For the assessment overall (10 min)

Develop an elevator speech we can all share.

“_______is the best assessment for Oregon students, because___________________________________”

1. Quality Assessment

Strengths for / reasons why this is the right assessment

2. Accommodations Available


3. Suite of Resources Available


4. Aligned to College and Career


5. Oregon can contribute to content


As a group, complete the following statement.

“__________is the best assessment for Oregon students because:

__________________________________________

___________________________________________”

ELEVATOR SPEECH

Next Steps

• ODE and any interested work group participants will present to State Board (Thursday, 05/16)

• State Board will decide whether to adopt assessment recommendation or take another action.

• ODE will write up process in final report, available publicly.

• Additional legislative meetings will occur

We will provide timely information to you throughout these steps.

Thank you for your thoughtful contributions.

WRAP UP

common core assessment selection work group may 10, 2013 oregon department of education

Documents