communications technology: slave or master? kristen bedard university of st.thomas december 17, 2002

23
Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Upload: stanley-mcdowell

Post on 30-Dec-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Communications Technology:Slave or Master?

Kristen BedardUniversity of St.Thomas

December 17, 2002

Page 2: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Predictions

• 1950s - Social scientists told us the

Great Leisure Age was approaching.

• 1967 - Senate Subcommittee testimony

predicted the coming of:

– 22-hour workweeks or 27 weeks per year.

– Retirement by age 38

Page 3: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Reality

• We now work an average of 47 hours

per week.

• Our leisure time has declined.

Page 4: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Prediction Reality

Technology would free usfrom long working hours.

Technology contributes tolonger working hours.

The Great Leisure Societywas approaching.

Half of Americans have lessthan 2 hours of leisure timeper day, and one-third haveless than one hour.

Increased productivity Increased productivity

Page 5: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

What the Literature Says

• Americans’ working hours have been increasing steadily since the 1960s.

• Leisure time has diminished.• We are a “hurry-up” society.• Self-worth and self-esteem are measured by

career status.• We are “Technostressed” - overwhelmed by

technology.

Page 6: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

What the Literature Says

• Predictions were optimistic.– Technological wonder– Economic conditions– Exaggerated market forecasts for products;

vested interest by manufacturers– They ignored the human factor

• Many predictions came true, but with unforeseen circumstances.

Page 7: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Has technology negatively impacted the lives of

communications professionals?

Page 8: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Methodology

• 300 communications professionals were surveyed.– Int’l Association of Business Communicators– Public Relations Society of America

• The survey consisted of 23 questions.

• 160 surveys were returned for a 53% response rate.

Page 9: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Respondent Profile

• Age 31-40• 68% female• 49% have college

degree• 36% have advanced

degree

• 44% have HHI over $100K

• 43% married with children

• 31% manager or supervisor level

Page 10: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Technology Usage

020

4060

80100

120140

160

Em

ail

Voi

cem

ail

Inte

rnet PC

Cel

lP

hone

PD

A

Pag

er

Tools Used

Page 11: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

What could I give up?

0

10

20

30

40

50

60N

othi

ng

Cel

lP

hone IM

Voi

cem

ail

PD

A

Pag

er

Inte

rnet

Em

ail

Tools Used

Page 12: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

I spend more time working today (both at my workplace and offsite) than I did five

years ago.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

# R

espo

nden

ts

Stro

ngA

gree

Agr

ee

Nei

ther

Dis

agre

e

Stro

ngD

isag

ree

Responses

21-3031-4041-5051-6061+

Age

Page 13: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

I have more leisure/free time available than I did five years ago.

01020304050607080

# R

espo

nden

ts

Stro

ngA

gree

Agr

ee

Nei

ther

Dis

agre

e

Stro

ngD

isag

ree

Responses

21-3031-4041-5051-6061+

Age

Page 14: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

I currently have an acceptable work-life balance.

0

20

40

60

80

100

# R

espo

nden

ts

Stro

ngA

gree

Agr

ee

Nei

ther

Dis

agre

e

Stro

ngD

isag

ree

Responses

21-3031-4041-5051-6061+

Age

Page 15: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

In general, technology has increased the pace of my life

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

# R

espo

nden

ts

Stro

ngA

gree

Agr

ee

Nei

ther

Dis

agre

e

Stro

ngD

isag

ree

Responses

21-3031-4041-5051-6061+

Age

Page 16: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

I complete some personal tasks on work time.

010

20

30

4050

60

70

80

90100

Always Often Sometimes Never

Responses

Page 17: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Communications technologies make me feel I’m “on call” for my employer almost all the time,

including non-working hours.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

StronglyAgree

Agree Neither Disagree StronglyDisagree

Responses

Page 18: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Productivity

• 95% agree that technology increases their productivity at work.

• 76% agree that technology increases their productivity at home.

Page 19: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Survey Indicates...

• Negative aspects of technology:– Increased working hours and less leisure time– Increased pace of life– On-call around the clock– Completing personal tasks at work

Page 20: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Survey Indicates...

• Positive aspects of technology:– Increased productivity – Flexibility– Acceptable work-life balance

Page 21: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Technology Paradoxes

• We have a love/hate relationship with personal communications technology.

• Technology increases productivity, but causes us to take on even more work.

• We can get things done faster, but still not fast enough.

Page 22: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Have we let technology manage us?

Page 23: Communications Technology: Slave or Master? Kristen Bedard University of St.Thomas December 17, 2002

Questions?