Complex Adaptive Network Systems (CANS) A variation based on Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS)

David Alman

April 2014 Draft 2

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 2

Contents 1 A CANS are Network Systems. ................................................................................................ 3

1.1 Definition ......................................................................................................................... 3

2. CANS Characteristics .......................................................................................................... 3

3. Network Model Examples ...................................................................................................... 5

3.1 Multileveled/Multilayered System Networks .................................................................. 5

3.2 Distributive Networks ...................................................................................................... 6

3.3 Area Grouping Network ................................................................................................... 7

7 Conflict Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 8

7.1 Conflict Network Analysis ................................................................................................ 8

7.2 Reframing Conflict Networks ........................................................................................... 9

8 Agent Based Modelling (ABM) .............................................................................................. 10

Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 11

References ............................................................................................................................... 12

About the author ..................................................................................................................... 13

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 3

Complex Adaptive Network Systems (CANS)

1 CANS are Network Systems.

1.1 Definition

A Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) is a network of social interacting agents that,

as a whole, represent a system. In this respect CANS include:

Humans referred to as Agents;

A social network, of which there are different forms;

A social network demonstrating human characteristics such as interrelationships

(e.g. conflict, cooperative, and competitive relationships); ideological narratives;

rules; and purposes;

A boundary that characterises what is inside and outside of the network system.

2. CANS Characteristics

CANS are dynamic network systems able to adapt to and evolve (i.e. co-evolve) in

their changing environment: There is no separation between a CANS and its

environment as CANS respond and adapt to their changing environment.

CANS has a number of characteristics such as:

A “Distributed” Network where there is no single centralised control mechanism

that governs social system network behaviour. Rather control of a CANS tends

to be highly dispersed. In this respect there is no hierarchy of command and

control in a CANS. There is no planning or managing, but there is a constant re-

organising to find the best fit with the environment, where the CANS is

continually self organising through the process of emergence and feedback.

Any coherent behaviour in a system arises from competition and cooperation

among the agents themselves. Some system networks tend toward order not

disorder through a process of spontaneous self organisation (based on evolved

simple rules).

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 4

Network “Connectivity” where a decision or action by one part within a CANS will

influence all other related parts but not in any uniform manner.

CANS interact in networks and form patterns of behaviour that could not have

been predicted from understanding each particular agent, and continuously

improves its efficiency to achieve its aims and objectives.

Network “Co-evolution” where network behaviour can change based on their

interactions with one another and with the environment. Additionally, patterns

of network behaviour can change over time.

Most CANS are “nested network systems”: Systems within other systems and

many are systems of smaller systems. CANS is part of many different network

systems most of which are themselves part of other network systems.

Chaos does have a place in CANS in that systems exist on a spectrum ranging

from equilibrium to chaos. A system in equilibrium does not have the internal

dynamics to respond to its environment (and slowly or quickly die). On the other

hand a system network in chaos ceases to function. The most productive state

to be in is at the edge of chaos where there is maximum variety and creativity,

leading to new possibilities.

CANS history grows from their own evolutionary environment. CANS evolve and

form a narrative about what they are about. While these system networks

evolve they constantly assess their past and present in order to inform their

future. History in terms of how they are rooted and evolved gives CANS a self-

generated “learning loop” from which it can increase its rate of emergence.

The future is unpredictable. As a CANS organises, it creates a multitude of

competing, complimentary and counter intuitive “alternatives” from which it will

derive its ‘future’. This allows the network system to employ the maximum

amount of variety and creativity in securing its future, whatever that may be. An

optimal network system exists on the edge of “chaos” where a CANS has the

ability to choose alternative futures is optimised, informed by network

knowledge that is generating a wide range of possibilities and alternatives.

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 5

3. Network Model Examples

3.1 Multileveled/Multilayered System Networks

CANS are decentralised networks of interacting humans (Agents) who frame and reframe

their purpose and react and respond to feedback from their external environment.

CANS networks can be multileveled/multilayered where agents at one level can

competitively or cooperatively interact with agents at another network level. A CANS can

also be part of another CANS, as exampled in Diagram 1.

Diagram 1 A Multileveled CANS Example

A work group CANS

An organisation CANS

A market CANS

A community CANS

An eco system CANS

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 6

3.2 Distributive Networks

Where each “node” is connected to neighbouring nodes within a decentralised network. A

node can represent agents, groups, communities, and so on as exampled in Diagram 1.

Diagram 2. Distributive Network

A Distributive network can also reflect layers or levels as shown in Diagram 3.

Diagram 3. Distributive Lattice Network

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 7

3.3 Area Grouping Network

A group of nodes, such as teams, who are in the same layer or level of a network. This is

analogous to peer groups relying on equal rather than on hierarchical arrangements, as

exampled in Diagram 4.

Diagram 4. Area Grouping Network

3.4 Ramification Network

Where control in the network is highly dispersed and decentralised, where the network is

split into related agent networks, as exampled in Diagram 5.

Diagram 5 Ramification Network

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 8

7 Conflict Analysis

7.1 Conflict Network Analysis

Conflict, and competition, between CANS agents, irrespective of the form of network they

are in, can be resolved and collaboration assisted by carrying out a Conflict Network Analysis

and applying a process that improves relationships, cooperation, and meaningful

understanding.

A Conflict Network Analysis uses types of conflict issues as a means of assessment as shown

in Table 1.

Types of Agent Conflict issues CANS Conflict Issue Examples

Structural issues e.g.what are the rule sets affecting agent behaviour

Value based issues e.g. What is the history of the conflict, and reinforcing Narratives?

Relationship based issues e.g. competition, cooperation

Information based issues

Interest based issues e.g. what are the interests underlying conflicts?

Needs based issues e.g. What are the agent Network’s needs?

Table 1

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 9

7.2 Reframing Conflict Networks

CANS agent conflicts can be resolved by the network agents working through and

addressing their issues. Diagram 6 is a shortened and amended version of Tuckman’s theory

of group development applied to groups as CANS, and extended to broader CANS

applications.

Diagram 6. Stages in Network Development

A Conflict Network Map is exampled is Diagram 7 that are based on conflict issues referred

to in Table 1. In terms of addressing System Network conflict a conflict resolution process

can explore:

Alternatives: What actions are possible”

Expectations: What future consequences might follow from each alternative? How

likely are possible consequences, assuming that alternatives are chosen?

Preferences: How valuable (to agents) are the consequences associated with each of

the alternatives?

Decision rule: How is a choice made among alternatives in terms of the values of

their consequences?

Network Forming

Network Storming

Network Norming

Network break up

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 10

Diagram 7. A Conflict Network Map

8 Agent Based Modelling (ABM)

Agent-based models consist of dynamically interacting rule-based agents that interact to

create real-world-like scenarios. ABMs are software systems that can simulate the

evolution of a CANS by, for example, explaining the emergence of social network patterns

such as in community behaviour, market performance; impact on ecosystem sustainability.

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 11

Conclusion

A Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) is a social network system that is decentralised

and can evolve to achieve its goals (or purposes), based on its own narratives; a set of

evolved rules; and these are related to a history of past circumstances. CANS respond to

their environment and themselves be “nested” within other network systems such as group;

group within an organisation; a group that strategically plans projects related to other

network systems such as markets, or communities, or environmental ecosystems. Each are

forms of interrelated and interacting system networks.

In developing CANS material three related areas are considered to explain what is, and what

is involved in, Complex Adaptive Network Systems:

Conflict Adaptive Systems (CAS);

Network models relevant to CAS

Conflict Networks

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 12

References

Complex Adaptive Systems. Serena Chan. Downloaded on 13/4/14 from

http://web.mit.edu/esd.83/www/notebook/Complex%20Adaptive%20Systems.pdf

What are Fractal Systems? Peter Fryer and Jules Ruis. Downloaded on 13/4/14 from

http://www.fractal.org/Bewustzijns-Besturings-Model/Fractal-systems.htm

Understanding and defeating a complex adaptive system. Lieutenant Colonel Ian Langford.

Downloaded on 13/4/14 from http://www.army.gov.au/Our-future/LWSC/Our-

publications/~/media/Files/Our%20future/DARA%20Publications/AAJ/2012Summer/Compl

ex-Adaptive-System-AAJ-Vol9-No3-Summer-2012.pdf

Navigating Complexity by Arthur Battram. First published by The Industrial Society, London

in 1998, and by Stylus Publishing inc, Sterling USA.

The Conflict Mapping Chart. L. Shay Bright Downloaded on 13/4/14

http://www.cmsupport.org/ConflictMapping/ConflictMappingChart_ShayBright.pdf

Field guide to conflict analysis. Downloaded on 14/4/14

http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0032e/a0032e0d.htm

Analysing actor networks while assuming "frame rationality". Pieter Bots Downloaded on

14/4/14

http://www.hks.harvard.edu/netgov/files/NIPS/PWG_BOTS_Analyzing_actor_networks_14_

June_2008.pdf

Systemic Conflict Transformation: Reflections on the Conflict and Peace Process in Sri Lanka Downloaded on 13/4/14 http://www.berghof-handbook.net/documents/publications/dialogue6_ropers_lead.pdf Group Dynamics Donelson Forsyth Downloaded on 13/4/14 http://www.cengagebrain.com.mx/content/forsyth68220_0534368220_02.01_chapter01.pdf

Complex Adaptive Network System (CANS) David Alman Draft 1 Page 13

About the author

David Alman lives in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, and is the business owner of Proventive Solutions, which offers services in Organisational Health. Organisational Health is a broad overview term that refers to assessing and improving performance and well being of both an organisation and its employees, recognising there is a nexus between the two.

David writes blogs, articles and PowerPoints on subjects related to organisational health, productivity, conflict management, and systems thinking. These can be accessed through a Google website and Word Press website. Please refer to: https://sites.google.com/site/proventivesolutions/ and http://davidalman.wordpress.com/home-page-welcome/