comprehensive campus master plan open forum 3/10/2011

COMPREHENSIVE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY

GouldEvans

3.10.2011 COMMUNITY MEETINGS

SCHEDULEComprehensive Campus Master Plan

PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSTIY

Gould Evans 28 July 2010

2010 2011

M J J A S O N D J F M

Steering Committee Meetings *

TOWN HALL MEETINGS

PHASE 1 - RESEARCH

* Project Initiation

Project Orientation

* Data Gathering

Strategic Plan Audit

Campus Site Audit

Campus Facilities Audit

Stakeholder Meetings

MEP Systems Assessment

Traffic Assessment

Space Needs Assessment

Data Assessment

* Review Findings

PHASE 2 - EXPLORATION

Alternatives

* Consider Alternatives

Plan Direction

* Define Desired Direction

PHASE 3 - DIRECTION

Master Plan Document

Implementation Strategy

* Reviews of Draft Plan

Adoption

ALIGNMENT with STRATEGIC PLAN

• BE PROACTIVE IN PROVIDING A PLANNED AND PURPOSEFUL FUTURE

• ENHANCE THE LEARNING AND LIVING ENVIRONMENT

• ALIGN FACILITIES WITH STRATEGIC NEEDS AND GROWTH

• RECOGNIZE AND BRIDGE THE EAST AND WEST AREAS OF CAMPUS

• MAXIMIZE OPERATING EFFICIENCIES

• FOSTER A SAFE AND SECURE CAMPUS

• DEFINE & ENHANCE CAMPUS AESTHETICS

• ENHANCE ENGAGEMENT WITH EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS

• INSTITUTIONALIZE ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

GOALS

A voluntary, self-assessment tool providing a clear and thorough

system by which higher education institutions can benchmark

where they are today and set goals for the future.

EXHIBIT: UNIVERSITY PROPERTY LINE

EXHIBIT: 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN

EXHIBIT: CURRENT CAMPUS PLAN

EXHIBIT: UNIVERSITY-OWNED REAL ESTATE

A: greek housing B: apartments

B.

A.

EXHIBIT: OTHER REAL ESTATE ON CAMPUS

Academic

Physical Plant

University Housing

Recreation/Athletics

Administration

Student/Faculty

Other

EXHIBIT: USE DISTRICTS

A: view from west

A.

B: view from south

B.

EXHIBIT: OPEN SPACE

EXHIBIT: TREE PLAN

Parking

EXHIBIT: ROADWAYS AND PARKING

+/- 4,000 SPACES

40%

19%

13% 20%

8%

EXHIBIT: PARKING DISTRIBUTION

EXHIBIT: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

EXHIBIT: TOPOGRAPHY

EXHIBIT: UTILITY-TUNNEL

EXHIBIT: UTILITY-WATER

EXHIBIT: UTILITY-ELECTRICAL

EXHIBIT: UTILITY-DATA

EXHIBIT: UTILITY-SEWER

EXHIBIT: UTILITY-SANITARY SEWER

10 min. 15 min. 20 min. 5 min.

EXHIBIT: WALKABILITY

Positive

Neutral

Negative

A.

A: approach from south B: approach from west

B.

EXHIBIT: EXTERIOR CHARACTER

Good/Excellent

Neutral

Poor/Unsatisfactory

EXHIBIT: EXTERIOR BUILDING CONDITIONS

Good/Excellent

Neutral

Poor/Unsatisfactory

EXHIBIT: INTERIOR BUILDING CONDITIONS

Good/Excellent

Neutral

Poor/Unsatisfactory

EXHIBIT: ENGINEERED SYSTEMS CONDITIONS

UTILIZATION: CLASSROOM ANALYSIS

FAMILY CONSUMER SCIENCE

HARTMAN HALL GRUBBS HALL

HUGHES HALL

KELCE HALL

KANSAS TECHNOLOGY CENTER

PORTER HALL MCPHERSON HALL

RUSS HALL

WEEDE HALL STUDENT REC CENTER

WHITESITT HALL

YATES HALL

M.W.F. SCHEDULE T.TH. SCHEDULE

8AM 9AM 10AM 11AM 12AM 1PM 2PM 3PM 8AM 9:30AM 11AM 12:30PM 2PM 3:30PM

169

583

FA

M

1737

1727

GH

586

HA

926

2562

HH

1958

2090

KC

1359

4761

KT

C 229

411

MH

467

1509

MP

257

PH

1837

2891

RH

531

1677

RE

C

1142

1082

WH

1611

2061

YH

22.5%

50.1% 26.5%

9.6%

48.4%

22.2%

35.8%

23.6%

15.5%

38.9%

24.0% 51.3%

43.9%

COURSE CAP

ROOM CAP

CLA

SS

RO

OM

UT

ILIZ

AT

ION

FILLED SEATS

.FIT COURSE VS.

CLASSROOM STOCK

0-20 21-40 41-60 61-80

81-100 100+

22

9

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

CAMPUS: COURSE VS. CLASSROOM STOCK

208

COURSE STOCK

74

264

61

17

18

0

72

24

24

24

440

CLASSROOM STOCK

0-20 21-40 41-60 61-80

81-100 100+

22

9

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

CAMPUS: COURSE VS. CLASSROOM STOCK

208

74

264

61

17

18

0

72

24

24

24

440

OVERAGE OF LARGER

CLASSROOM STOCK

COURSE STOCK

CLASSROOM STOCK

NEED MORE 0-20 CAP

CLASSROOMS

UTILIZATION: PART II: LAB ANALYSIS

FAMILY CONSUMER SCIENCE

HECKERT-WELLS HALL

GRUBBS HALL

HUGHES HALL

KANSAS TECHNOLOGY CENTER

PORTER HALL STUDENT REC CENTER

WHITESITT HALL

YATES HALL

8AM 9AM 10AM 11AM 12AM 1PM 2PM 3PM

T.TH. SCHEDULE

8AM 9:30AM 11AM 12:30PM 2PM 3:30PM

M.W.F. SCHEDULE

204

660

FA

M

791

2129

GH

943

HW

H

H

856

2016

KT

C

MH

342

610

PH

230

RE

C

365

YH

531

1611

23.6%

27.1%

10.4%

41.1%

29.8%

29.5%

35.9%

17.9%

28.7%

FILLED SEATS

ROOM CAP

LA

B U

TIL

IZA

TIO

N

665 215 141

204

660

FA

M

791

2129

GH

943

HW

H

H

856

2016

KT

C

MH

342

610

PH

230

RE

C

365

YH

531

1611

23.6%

27.1%

10.4%

41.1%

29.8%

29.5%

35.9%

17.9%

28.7%

LA

B U

TIL

IZA

TIO

N

665 215 141

COURSE CAP

FILLED SEATS

ROOM CAP

78

14

CLASSROOMS

BUILDINGS YH

GH HH

KTC

FAM

HA

KC

MH

WH

REC

RH PH MP 5.4%

1.5%

3.3%

4.7%

0.5%

5.1%

0.2% 2.7%

5.7%

4.0%

0.7%

1.4%

0.1%

CLASSROOM UTILIZATION

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

build

ing c

ap

acity

8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 Night

time of day

FAM

GH

HA

HH

HW

KC

KTC

MH

MP

PH

REC

RH

TBA

WE

WH

YH

BUILDING UTILIZATION un

de

rutiliz

ed b

uild

ing c

apa

city

du

rin

g p

eak h

ours

(9

am

– 3

pm

)

.TARGETS CLASSROOM

BUILDING

CAMPUS

%

TARGET BUILDING UTILIZATION

CLASSROOMS

UTILIZED

6 OF 8

PERIODS OF

THE DAY

%

TARGET CLASSROOM UTILIZATION

CLASSROOMS

FILLED

TO 80%

OF

CAPACITY

%

TARGET CLASSROOM UTILIZATION

%

TARGET BUILDING UTILIZATION

%

TARGET CAMPUS UTILIZATION

=

%

TARGET CAMPUS UTILIZATION

%

CURRENT CAMPUS UTILIZATION

• PRESIDENT, PROVOST, ADMINISTRATIVE VICE PRESIDENTS

• DEANS, ARTS & SCIENCES, BUSINESS, EDUCATION, TECHNOLOGY,

CONTINUING & GRADUATE STUDIES, ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT &

STUDENT SUCCESS

• CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER, DIRECTORS OF FACILITIES

PLANNING, BUILDING TRADES & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, AND

CUSTODIAL & GENERAL SERVICES

• ATHLETICS

• DIRECTORS OF CAMPUS LIFE & AUXILIARY SERVICES, UNIVERSITY

HOUSING, STUDENT CENTER, CAMPUS RECREATION, UNIVERSITY

POLICE & PARKING SERVICES

• CAMPUS SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE

• CITY OF PITTSBURG

STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS

• MASTER PLAN PROVIDES A PATTERN FOR LONG TERM

DEVELOPMENT

• OVERALL CAMPUS GROWTH IS PLANNED AT 1% TO 2% PER YEAR

• KTC GROWTH IS AT 5% TO 7% PER YEAR

• GROWTH FOR OTHER DEPARTMENTS ON CAMPUS

REMAIN BASICALY STABLE

• THE STOCK OF SMALL CLASSROOMS ON CAMPUS NEEDS TO BE

INCREASED

• HARTMAN REPRESENTS A REASONABLE OPTION FOR ADDITIONAL

CLASSROOMS AND/OR LABS

GUIDING CONCLUSIONS

• EACH DEPARTMENT HAS UNIQUE FACILITY ISSUES – INCLUDING

SPECIFIC NEEDS SUCH AS ACCESIBILITY, TEACHING SPACE,

STUDY/WORK/SOCIAL SPACE, CONFERENCE SPACE, AND

FACULTY OFFICE SPACE – WHICH SHOULD BE ADDRESSED

ON A RENOVATION AND/OR EXPANSION BASIS BUILDING BY

BUILDING

• A SMALL STOCK OF GENERAL CLASSROOMS SHOULD BE UTILIZED

AS A RELIEF VALVE

FOR SCHEDULING ISSUES

• PARKING ON CAMPUS SHOULD BE EXPANDED IN PROPORTION TO

SPACE EXPANSION

• HOUSING SHOULD BE EXPANDED IN PROPORTION TO

ENROLLMENT GROWTH

RECOMMENDATIONS



FIRST ROUND MP OPTIONS



REVISED MP OPTIONS

OPTION 1

OPTION 2

OPTION 1



PROPOSED MASTER PLAN


Guide campus development

over the next ten years


Develop an east/west Campus

Walk, a safe and attractive

pedestrian thoroughfare

across campus


Expand the distinct landscaping

of the Oval to unify the

campus


Organize new construction

around pedestrian oriented

green space


Renovate older buildings

around the Oval


Enhance campus edges and

gateways to project a positive

image


Provide additional space near

the west end of campus to

relieve off-campus parking

congestion and

accommodate future growth

in the campus housing

system.

• IMPLEMENTATION PHASE

• PRIORITIES

• FUNDING

• POLICY IMPLICATIONS

• FINAL REVIEWS

• ADOPTION

NEXT STEPS . . .

.QUESTIONS?

comprehensive campus master plan open forum 3/10/2011

Education