comprehensive commmunications training officer a …

117
COMPREHENSIVE COMMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER PROGRAM GUIDE A Project Presented to the faculty of the Division of Criminal Justice California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Criminal Justice by Teresa Lee Mendoza SPRING 2019

Upload: others

Post on 12-Dec-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

COMPREHENSIVE

COMMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER

PROGRAM GUIDE

A Project

Presented to the faculty of the Division of Criminal Justice

California State University, Sacramento

Submitted in partial satisfaction of

the requirements for the degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE

in

Criminal Justice

by

Teresa Lee Mendoza

SPRING

2019

ii

© 2019

Teresa Lee Mendoza

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

iii

COMPREHENSIVE

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER

PROGRAM GUIDE

A Project

by

Teresa Lee Mendoza

Approved by:

__________________________________, Committee Chair

Timothy E. Croisdale, Ph.D.

____________________________

Date

iv

Student: Teresa Lee Mendoza

I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the

University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library

and credit is to be awarded for the project.

__________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________

Yvette Farmer, Ph.D. Date

Division of Criminal Justice

v

Abstract

of

COMPREHENSIVE

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER

PROGRAM GUIDE

by

Teresa Lee Mendoza

Communications Training Officers (CTOs) within the 24 California Highway Patrol

state-wide Communications Centers (CC) currently lack a comprehensive training guide

which provides a roadmap to guide them and enhance their ability to assess and

accurately document performance. The current standardized method of training for

entry-level dispatchers within the California Highway Patrol consists of five weeks of

departmental mandated Peace Officer Standards of Training (POST) and Agency Specific

(AS) Public Safety Dispatcher Basic Course (PSDBC) call-taking and radio training at

the CHP Academy. To improve current practices and create a user-friendly all-inclusive

training overview document for CTOs, this project was developed to enhance their

understanding of the Department’s Training Standards in an intelligible abridged version.

New CTOs must be introduced to their multi-faceted roles as informal leaders as

not only a trainer, but a coach, mentor, counselor, and a peer. The Comprehensive

Communications Training Officer Program Guide, Annex A, Roadmap to the Golden

Gate Dispatch Training Program, provides each CTO visual and written queues with the

vi

goal of eliminating the confusion and frustration he or she may encounter when

struggling to interpret cumbersome wordy department policy.

_______________________, Committee Chair

Timothy E. Croisdale, Ph.D.

_______________________

Date

vii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would personally like to express my great appreciation to all those, who

throughout the years have played a pivotal role in my continued education and career.

My mom, Lee, twin-sister, Tracy, and my children, Kristopher, Kyle, Kourtney, and

Angelica who were with me for the long haul. I would personally like to thank those

who helped me navigate my way through a 17-year civilian career with the Air Force.

The following individuals directly influenced the professional I evolved into by molding

and mentoring me into a career-oriented working professional: Retired General

Raymond Johns, Retired Colonels Kirby Wiest and Bernie Fullenkamp, Retired

Lieutenant Colonels John Wells and Steve Bush, Retired Chief Master Sergeants Ed

Pugh and Robert Sharp, Master Sergeants Mike Riley, Jesse Palapasas, Joe Brooks,

Jimmie Rost, and many others.

I shift gears at 35 and followed my passion, entering the realm of Law

Enforcement by becoming a California Highway Patrol Public Safety Dispatcher. I

would like to convey my deep and genuine gratitude to those who were pivotal during

that transition, willing to take a chance on me at numerous junctures, and contributed to

my success over the years. Those undeniable leaders and mentors are: Captain Ezery

Beauchamp, Commander Dee Dee Teel, Retired Lieutenant Dave Raleigh, Retired

Sergeant James Owens, Public Safety Dispatcher Supervisor IIs Mary Pat Marshall and

Evelyn Graham, and many others. A special thanks goes out to all the Public Safety

Dispatchers who encouraged me during my tenure, especially Sheila Scott, for sharing

viii

her stay-at-home mom’s inspiring story about starting college at 50 and achieving a

Master’s Degree in 5 years. This only encouraged my desire to complete my college

education.

Many collegiate instructors were instrumental throughout the years, but here are

the ones that I would like to personally thank for being a motivational factor in my

success through their guidance, patience, and understanding: Keith Twitchell (Solano

Community College); Collette Harris-Matthews and Shannon Mills (Cosumnes River

College); and Drs. Maguire, Singer, Lee, Escobar, and Mr. Carver, Mr. Horowitz, and

Ms. Mumma (California State University, Sacramento (CSUS)). However, without a

doubt, the ones that truly deserve recognition are Dr. Farmer and Dr. Croisdale, CSUS

Master’s Program. They provided the systematic foundation and guidance I needed to

keep motivated throughout completing this project and my degree.

ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... vii

Chapter

1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1

Statement of the Problem ...................................................................................1

Purpose of the Study ..........................................................................................4

Definition of the Terms ......................................................................................6

Organization of the Project ................................................................................8

2. LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................9

Introduction .......................................................................................................9

Education and Non-Sworn Communications Staff ..........................................10

In-House Agency Training ..............................................................................14

Communications Training Officer (CTO) Specific Training ..........................17

Summary ..........................................................................................................20

3. PROJECT PROCESS ............................................................................................21

Organization of Project ....................................................................................23

Project Product .................................................................................................23

Summary ..........................................................................................................27

x

4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................28

Training and Retention Challenges. .................................................................30

Summary ..........................................................................................................35

Appendix A. Roadmap to the Golden Gate Communications Dispatch Training

Program ............................................................................................................36

References ..................................................................................................................103

1

Chapter 1

Introduction

Public Safety Dispatchers (PSDs) are the most vital link between law

enforcement officers when providing a conduit between themselves and lifesaving

resources to the public they serve. The lack of consistent retention of non-uniformed

dispatch personnel is inherent in most large law enforcement agencies. Turner (2015),

established through her research that there were various factors that attribute to this

include, but are not limited to: recruitment, hiring, training, benefits, work hours, shifts,

promotional opportunities, cannibalism (tenured peers harsh criticism and systematic

passive aggressive attacks on one’s confidence), and stress. Specialized and

Standardized Training and its effectiveness remain consistently at the forefront when

determining the aptitude required by entry-level dispatch employees. Law Enforcement

agencies that currently have standardized dispatch training in place use assessments as a

form of measuring one’s ability to retain the information learned (Commission on

Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA), 2015). Once in a live setting,

new employees are required to translate the learned information in order to apply it to

real life scenarios.

Statement of the Problem

Until recently, law enforcement agencies nation-wide have put little emphasis on

roles that PSDs play as first responders (Grace, 2012). Typically, PSDs have taken a

back seat to Peace Officers; these professionals play a vital role in providing emergency

support services to the public. They routinely make decisions that can have life-saving

2

consequences for individuals who are victims of crime, have been involved in traffic

collisions, or are experiencing a medical emergency by providing safety, security, and

emergency services to the public.

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (2008), there were approximately

18,000 state and local law enforcement agencies operating in the United States

(Dunham, 2015). Nationwide there are more than one million full-time employees

staffing these agencies. However, the majority of these organizations are small,

consisting of 10 or less employees. Larger law enforcement agencies may recruit and

hire their own PSDs, but many agencies rely on the contracted emergency dispatching

services of the larger organizations (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2008).

Chiaburu and Lindsay (2008), determined that the organizations throughout the

United States spent over $50 billion on formal training in 2000 alone. PSDs are the first

line of defense when assisting the public in crisis, yet most of these agencies lack

standardized formal training (Chiaburu & Lindsay (2008)). This could not be any

clearer than in the Denise Amber Lee kidnapping and Murder case. PSDs had the

multiple resources available to them to properly handle the 9-1-1 calls from

the victim and witnesses, but due lack of standardized training and communication

efforts, the victim was subsequently murdered (Lee, 2013).

Although educational training curriculum has been around for decades,

curriculum development for Law Enforcement and in particular PSDs, has only started

evolving since the early 1980s. Peace Officers need the resources, they are the ones

putting their lives on the line and keeping our streets safe. There can be various reasons,

3

which include the following: funding PSDs are in the back-drop; jobs are not that

strenuous, all they have to do is answer the phone or talk on the radio; lack of technical

expertise required to deal with and educate the varied requirements of this particular

career field; and no standardized training (California Highway Patrol Highway Patrol

Manual 60.5, Communications Training Manual [CHP], 2014).

Many law enforcement agencies continually struggle to maintain their PSDs

staffing retention levels. There are many reasons for this, and the majority of individuals

like to blame it on the stress. However, stress when coupled with other mitigating

circumstances can result in lack of success. Initial standardized training, or lack thereof,

may result in lack of confidence for the trainer, which could be outwardly exhibited in a

negative manner toward the trainee (CHP, 2014).

Many law enforcement agencies are small and in order to be cost effective,

contract their dispatch services from larger agencies. However, the California Highway

Patrol hires and trains individuals to provide that service directly. The CHP has 24

Communications Centers (CCs) throughout the state. These CCs range in size from a

minimum staff of 12, in the small centers, up to a staff of 200 in the larger centers, with

size variations in between. As a whole, there is an immediate need for the Department

to hold CCs accountable for standardized training compliance, recruitment and retention,

and most importantly taking the stigma off training new hires. The goal of creating a

Communications Training Officer Guide should assist in the reduction of the California

Highway Patrol’s retention problem through proactive in-house standardized training

(CHP, 2014).

4

Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this study is to create a Comprehensive Communications

Training Officer (CTO) Program Guide for the Golden Gate Communications Center’s

Training Program. As instructional techniques and technology evolve in all facets of

professional law enforcement career fields, agency training programs must be willing to

take the next step and make necessary adjustments in their training programs to avoid

becoming stagnant, deficient, or obsolete. The GGCC Training Program continues to

conduct its training the same way as it did 20 years ago, with no concrete established

expectations and little if any one-on-one set guidelines for the CTOs. As a result, there

are no structured training procedures to follow and past-practice cycle prevails, leaving

new CTOs to rely following the lead of complacent tenured CTOs.

After conducting research and analyzing the current GGCC Training Program, it

was clear that the GGCC CTOs required more structured one-on-one training, but very

limited resources are available to develop and standardized in-house dispatch training

programs. Although CHP does have policy and procedures in place that meets the

overall departmental requirements for the 24 state-wide CHP communications centers,

they can be cumbersome and challenging to navigate for the user. Currently, CTOs do

not receive any formalized center-specific in-house training. This written document is a

training platform that formulates a solid training foundation through established

expectations, guidelines, and easily understood visual training documents for all CTOs.

There is no similar CHP or GGCC document n existence available to experienced and

future CTOs.

5

This guide will be incorporated into a newly established 4-hour introductory in-

house training class, taught by the Training Program Supervisors, for all current and

future CTOs. Eventually the goal is to allow expert CTOs to take over the training.

This class will allow CTOs to receive training specifically focused on broadening

knowledge and proficiency on how to appropriately train new dispatchers. In-turn,

serving as a foundational tool to ease trainers’ apprehension, while transitioning from

their current role of PSD to a CTO. In addition, the information included in the

document should answer questions that CTOs may have regarding the individual and

cumulative training process.

6

Communications Training Program definitions.

This section provides the training guide user clear concise descriptions of

significant terminology utilized throughout the text or in the graphic examples. This will

enable the user to clearly interpret and understand the information presented. The third

section of the guide describes the guide’s construction and layout. It lists the remainder

of the sections and explains the importance of having those sections within the guide.

Definition of Terms

To ensure clarity, the terms used often, and throughout the text are defined:

AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI). The

American National Standards Institute is a private non-profit organization that oversees

the development of voluntary consensus standards for products, services, processes,

systems, and personnel in the United States (Lee, 2013 p. 2).

CALEA. Acronym for Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement

Agencies. The CALEA Public Safety Communications Accreditation Program provides

a communications center, or the communications unit of a public safety agency, with a

process to systemically review and internally assess its operations and procedures

(Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) 2018.

Retrieved December 22, 2018, from http://www.calea.org).

CANNIBLISM. The act of cannibalizing something (Webster Dictionary,

Merriam-Webster, (2019) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/definition).

Individuals in the workplace who intentionally undermine others during the course of

their duties.

7

CIVILIAN. Specifically, and exclusively, “all who are not members of the

force” (Chess, 1960 p. 591).

CTO. Acronym for Communications Training Officer. A management position

within an emergency contact or dispatch center. CTOs are responsible for training and

supervising the people who answer 911 calls and direct members of the emergency

services to the scenes of incidents. It is a highly specialized and challenging role,

particularly because, in an emergency, there is no room for error. You play a key role in

ensuring a quick and appropriate response in all emergencies. The CTOs must guide

trainees through a comprehensive training program that requires the blending of

knowledge and skills, and the good judgment of where, when, and how to apply them

(CHP, 2014).

PSD. Acronym for Public Safety Dispatcher. These are the 9-1-1 dispatchers

who receive calls for service from individuals who need assistance from Firefighters,

Police Officers, and Emergency Medical Services (CHP, 2014)

PEDAGOGY. The art, science, or profession of teaching (Webster Dictionary,

Merriam-Webster, (2019) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/definition).

POST. Acronym for the Commission on Peace Officer’s Standards and Training

(POST). The POST Program is voluntary and incentive-based. Participating agencies

agree to abide by standards and established by POST. More than 600 agencies

participate in the POST Program and are eligible to receive the Commission’s services

and benefits (POST, 2018).

8

SELF-EFFICACY. One’s belief in his or her own ability to succeed in specific

situation (Chiaburu & Lindsay, 2018 p. 199-200).

Organization of the Project

Chapter 1 reviewed the history of the Public Safety Dispatcher (PSD)

Communications Training Officer (CTO) within the California Highway Patrol, and

momentarily familiarizes the reader with project’s purpose and objective. The Literature

Review, Chapter 2, focuses on the small body of literature on law enforcement

communications officer training. As a project overview, Chapter 3 provides historical

and current deficiencies within GGCC and CHP Communications Centers state-wide

immediately warranting modern evolution of in-house dispatch training programs. The

reader will obtain highlights of the project’s origination, collaborative process, and

construction to complete the project. In addition, it also describes the construction,

layout, and importance of all sections within the training guide. In conclusion,

Chapter 4, delivers the reader an overall assessment of the project, the benefits and

drawbacks that CTOs may experience during the project’s use, and when needed

prospective revision updates.

9

Chapter 2

Literature Review

Introduction

Law enforcement has evolved over the last two centuries, with the first organized

agency in America opening its doors in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Reiss, 1992). Other

large cities started following suit shortly thereafter. According to the Alaska Justice

Forum and the U.S. State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies Census of 2008, a

Bureau of Justice Statistics Report States:

Our nation has 17,985 state and local law enforcement agencies with at least one

full-time officer or equivalent in part-time officers, including: 12,501 local

police departments; 3,063 sheriff’s offices, 50 primary state law enforcement

agencies; 1,733 special jurisdiction agencies; and 683 other agencies, primarily

county constable offices in Texas (p. 8).

Critical thinking is one of the key elements necessary for trainers to objectively

analyze and evaluate issues, both for departmental policy and procedure interpretation as

well as during critical performance issues with employees. The ability to quickly analyze

a particular situation and make a prudent decision quickly interpreting policy and the

employee’s needs is an essential part of an in-house training program. Proper judgment

is imperative as Communications Training Officers (CTOs) are required to anticipate

potential issues, assume responsibility, take prompt and appropriate action, stabilize

situations, and confirm resources are utilized effectively.

10

Knowledge of proper verbal and written communication skills will ensure CTOs

are able to effectively deliver information, speak eloquently to trainees, defuse caustic

training situations, and convey messages professionally. They are responsible for

mitigating any training conflicts in stressful situations, handling sensitive issues with

tact, communicating performance standards, and providing feedback to employees.

CTOs must utilize effective communication techniques, including active listening skills,

which are essential for interpersonal communication amongst themselves and the trainee.

Communicating effectually supports working relationships with trainees, the field,

supervision, allied agencies and the public.

Education and Non-Sworn Communications Staff

According to Dalkir (2011), the ability to manage intellectual capital is

increasingly crucial in today’s knowledge economy as the use of technology has grown

exponentially over the last three decades. You have only to pick up a cell phone to fully

understand the magnitude of virtual reality and its effect on today’s society on a social,

economic, and educational level. Our nation today could not function effectively and

without modern technology. This is apparent in various facets which include, but are not

limited to: banking, shopping, education, politics, medical procedures, law enforcement,

military forces, social media, libraries, law enforcement, etc. Fighting the evolution of

technology is not an option since the list is endless and each day brings a new discovery.

Instead, coming to terms with the millennials learning mindset, a generation of

individuals raised and empowered through the use of technology, can present learning

challenges for educators from other generations (Endedijk & Vermunt, 2011).

11

Dalkir (2011) found that knowledge is a valuable commodity that is embedded in

products (especially high tech) and tacit skills of highly mobile employees. In order to

make sense of how this works, you have only to look at the education systems within

local communities. Many are moving away from the text books, not only due to cost,

but to cater to the next generation educational learner. Gorozidis and Papaioannou

(2014) both conveyed that school innovations have become increasingly important for

worldwide reforms in an attempt to improve education and to switch from traditional

teaching practices (teacher-centered) to more creative student-centered approaches (e.g.

cooperative, project-based learning). This dilemma is not just specific to the United

States, but has an impact on a global scale. To provide some evidence of this, over the

last decade Greece’s Ministry of Education has utilized top-down reform efforts in an

attempt to improve education and to align national curricula with international trends

(Gorozidis & Papaioannou, 2014).

In light of today’s standard of technology, it’s not how much information you

can obtain or even the talent of an organization, but how to effectively manage the

readily available and accessible resources (Dalkir, 2011). A cliché often heard within

most organizations and educational institutions is “knowledge is key.” The

identification of key knowledge is closely related to strategic planning activities, such as

establishing the knowledge gap, the definition of objectives and strategy of knowledge,

technology orientation and human aspects, and activities related to post-identification

processes (Arias & Durango, 2009). Educational innovations are typically optional

centrally organized in-service or continuous professional development training

12

programs, with no guarantee that the receiver will gain anything from the experience

(Gorozidis & Papaioannou, 2014). In other words, you can deliver the message, but

only the receiver can determine what they take away from the process. This is why

providing an instrument, such as situational learning activities, periodically throughout

training reinforces and measures the receiver’s (the trainee) aptitude and level of

comprehension. In order to measure the learners’ actual cognitive retention, it is critical

that the instructional information being relayed, teaching style, and training materials are

used to directly convey the information as it correlates with real life scenarios.

Individuals have various types of motivations for learning and educators utilize a

variety of teaching techniques based on how they have learned to instruct. Gorozidis and

Papaioannou (2014) found that a teacher’s motivation to learn has a direct impact on the

aptitude and willingness of a students’ educational development. Secondary to that, a

research project conducted by the Ministry of Education in 2011, showed that motivation

of teachers to implement innovation played a pivotal role in the organization, grouping,

motivation, and guidance of students (Gorozidis & Papaioannou, 2014) To further

expound on this, recent studies have shown that teachers’ motivation and cognition (e.g.

self-efficacy, attitudes, appraisals, beliefs, goals) are vital for the impetus of their

workplace learning (Geijsel, Sleegers, Stoel & Kruger, 2009; Kwakman, 2003; Lohman,

2006; Runhaar, 2008; Vermunt & Endedijk, 2011). Students, to this day, tend to mimic

the social and behavioral learning styles exhibited by their educator.

One obstacle that plagues teachers today is the learning savvy of their students.

The millennial students have an advantage over previous generations; starting from early

13

in the developmental stages of childhood many were consistently exposed to some form

of advanced technology that was prevalent within the last year, let alone the last decade.

This cognitive evolution may have started with basic exposure to a television remote

control, Angry Bird computer games, going onto cellular devices, and social media

outlets. Endedijk and Vermunt (2011) discovered that the flow of information readily

available, via the internet, has left students with more diversified information

backgrounds and teachers no longer know everything better than students.

Teaching methods for many disciplines are being created in order to fall in line

with new pedagogies. According to Endedijk and Vermunt (2011), instruction has

become extremely diversified, starting with the origination of traditional teaching, where

teachers have to explain the subject matter well and regulate the learning of their

students. The next step is the transition into assignment-based teaching which includes

designing good assignments, giving feedback, coaching students, and getting students to

work actively. Subsequent to that is problem-based learning in which the teacher fulfills

varied roles (tutor, skills trainer and assessor, problem designer, and block coordinator).

The next progression presupposes that a teacher can supervise and guide project groups,

encourage collaboration within groups, and make sure that all students contribute

equally to the group products, commonly referred to as the project-centered teaching.

Finally, teachers traditionally utilize competency-based teaching to align themselves as

role models, career advisers, competency assessors, professional growth consultants.

This parallels the current dual learning program models that emulates student learning

14

through a mentoring process that provides clarity to students and addresses their

concerns.

In all student-oriented forms of teaching, teachers should be able to act as

diagnostician, challenger, model, activator, monitor, reflector and evaluator of students’

learning processes (Vermunt & Verloop, 1999). Tenured educators are often faced with

unique instructional technique challenges that typically present themselves when an

institution advocates change, becomes modernized, and evolves. According to the

model that Shulman and Shulman (2004) developed, educators have to develop a new

view of teaching and student learning, be motivated to learn about the new ways of

teaching, understand the concepts and principles on which the innovation is based,

develop skills to translate the new way of teaching into practice, reflect on their

experiments with the new pedagogy in order to learn, and form part of the community of

teachers who are all learning new things. Ultimately, the desire to learn and teach

revolves around learning orientations, motivation, and teachers’ will to learn (Ebdedijk

& Vermunt, 2011).

In-House Agency Training

H. Dolezalek, Associate Editor of Training Magazine, related in a 2004 Training

Annual Industry Report, that the US spent more than $50 billion annual on formal

training (as cited in Caetano, Lyons, Michel & Kavanagh, 2007, p. 282). The

importance of the astronomical amount of funds spent on training is whether or not it is

effective, and the desired outcome been reached for the agencies making the

investments. In other words, it is important for organizations to ensure that training

15

leads to desired work outcomes, such as increases in job performance (Caetano et al.,

2007). Chiaburu and Lindsay (2008) both agree that training programs are effective

only to the extent that the skills and behaviors learned and practiced during instruction

are actually transferred to the workplace.

In 2012, Gustafson and McClellan reiterated a very basic thought process that

originated in 1964 with Wilensky, “Education is central to most accounts of

professionalization” (p. 109). Sheehan (1995) expounded further by stating, a

professional position is one that “requires advanced education and training involving

intellectual skills” (p. 17). In 2012, Gustafson and McClellan went on to deliver the

following message: although it is impossible to account fully for the multifaceted and

evolving status of the professional, this work is committed to keeping complexity in

mind as it explores the nature of law enforcement professionalization. Traditionally, law

enforcement has functioned as a bureaucracy with significant systems of oversight and

strict procedural rules and regulations (Schneider, 2009). According to Gustafson and

McClellan (2012), assumptions were drawn from their research, which in-turn provided

a baseline for exploring law enforcement’s often disputed occupational status (p. 111):

- Professions are characterized by specified levels of education aligned with

specific bodies of scholarly knowledge as a necessary, but insufficient, condition

- A public discourse of trust has typically ensured a great deal of work autonomy

in exchange for certain educational and ethical commitments, but these

discourses are being reshaped by enterprise interests; and

16

- The everyday discourse of professionals in the workplace simultaneously draws

on larger public discourses while potentially challenging or reshaping these same

public discourses.

Professional status relies on both changing public discourses and everyday on-

the-job discourse. This approach understands discourse as constitutive of larger social

structures and arrangements. Organizational communication scholars look at everyday

talk, artifacts, and rituals to better understand how professions are enacted. For many

decades, scholars and practitioners have struggled to determine whether law enforcement

is a profession (Gustafson & McClellan, 2012). Education and training, or lack thereof,

are enacted in countless everyday situations. One example provided was an officer

encounters behavior perceived as problematic and/or a violation of the law and in-turn

will need to interpret these behaviors in ways that correspond with laws, best practices,

and agency expectations (Gustafson & McClellan, 2012).

Our society is waking up to the fact that a well-trained and certified 911

workforce and its life saving capabilities deserve the same level of professionalism,

uniformity and citizen oversight as many other occupations whose impact on human life

is seemingly insignificant in comparison (Lee, 2013). The very nature of police work

keeps the everyday dispatch of police response more continuous and complex than

dispatching fire apparatus or medical units, because fire and medical situations routinely

are handled by field supervisors on the scene after the initial callout (Sheehan, 1995).

According to Nonaka and Takeuchi (1999), knowledge is something that cannot be

managed in conventional terms, but it is possible to work in organizational dynamics

17

that allows interaction and conversion of individual knowledge to ensure Policing is

being reconstructed worldwide.

Communications Training Officer (CTO) Specific Training

Law enforcement standards are also notably inconsistent in the US in terms of

scholarly education (Carte, 1969; Carter, Sapp, Stephens, 1989). Measures of education

requirements and the impact of education on policing tend to be the focal point of

professionalization efforts and arguments for and against change. Since the broad move

toward increased law enforcement standards in the 1970s and 1980s, minimum required

training hours have remained relatively stable in law enforcement (Rojek, Kaminski,

Smith, & Scheer, 2007) Higher education standards were called for by the President’s

Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice in 1967 and many have

echoed this call (Carter et al., 1989; Travis, 1995).

Over two decades ago, Sheehan (1995), showed that dispatchers were historically

treated as the step-children of the emergency service field, willing and happy to take

advantage of any formal training they could acquire. In the mid-1980s, Connecticut's

Bureau of Statewide Emergency Telecommunications (BSET) recognized the need to

regulate telecommunicator training and established a foundation for its agencies. After a

lengthy campaign, the state passed legislation mandating certification for all emergency

dispatchers and telecommunicators hired after January 1, 1990 (Sheehan, 1995). Armed

with a structured program, the bureau then established criteria for instructors that include

a “method of instruction” course and at least 2 years of related experience (Sheehan,

1995). Since the introduction of the program in April 1990, the BSET has continued to

18

refine the curriculum (Sheehan, 1995). Although a painstakingly difficult task, the

BSET eventually paved the way for many established and new law enforcement

agencies nation-wide that would start breaking ground on their own dispatch training

programs.

The momentum for this long overdue missing piece of emergency response is

gathering steam. In the state of Florida, the Denise Amber Lee Act passed requiring 232

hours of training and passage of a state exam took effect on October 1, 2012 (Lee, 2013).

Lee (2013) went on to further state that previous issues with personnel and budget

constraints in the past have caused agency administrators to express some concern over

the necessity for training beyond what dispatchers need for certification. On-the-job

training cannot be avoided. Standard for Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement

within the Public Safety Communications Center defines the industry recommended

minimum components to evaluate performance of public safety communications

personnel. The goal is to have this standard formally introduced to the American

National Standards Institute (ANSI) and be developed into an ANSI recognized standard

(Lee, 2013). While some training and standards exist, there is an opportunity to define

how nationwide training standards, minimum guidelines, or requirements could be

implemented. Lee (2013) further clarifies that without this formalized training, a lack of

uniformity and service delivery will persist now and during the transition to Next

Generation 911.

One of the most cost-effective options for many law enforcement agencies,

typically smaller ones, is to ensure the dispatchers they hire receive initial adequate

19

standardized training through a community college or specialized academy at their own

expense (Etter, 1998). This alleviates the training expense for the hiring agency, but still

provides strict standardized guidelines the applicant must adhere to in order to be

selected for the position. Pre-service students routinely utilize post-secondary

educational opportunities to acquire enough training to make themselves marketable to

law enforcement hiring officials. This is contrary to in-service students, who are

currently employed by an agency and are either attempting to advance themselves or

maintain their licenses.

With very few exceptions, law enforcement education regulatory standards

remain law throughout the United States (Carter et al., 1989). Subject matter

requirements have increased notably while training hours have remained constant. In

California, for example, many new requirements were added to the minimum basic

training curriculum while the total minimum hours remained constant (Commission on

Peace Officer Standards and Training, 2007; Rojek et al., 2007). The fields of law

enforcement and corrections have become increasingly more complex. New laws, new

procedures, and new technology have forced the law enforcement community to advance

the education and training of their personnel (Etter, 1998). It is imperative that both

police departments and colleges communicate regularly to ensure curricula and policies

are constantly being reviewed, updated, and relayed to the intended recipient in a timely

manner (Etter, 1998). To assist with achieving and maintaining that goal, agencies rely

on POST and the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies

(CALEA), two of the best standardized Law Enforcement training and compliance

20

programs nationwide, to provide guidance and ensure all law enforcement and dispatch

training is provided consistent, relevant, and effective manner.

Summary

In spite of the large volume of law enforcement agencies in the United States and

the billions of dollars cumulatively being spent on training, to-date law enforcement

agencies still function as a bureaucracy. This results in very little emphasis being placed

on dispatch training. Dispatchers are the vital link between the public, especially those

in crisis and the lifesaving emergency services needed.

In order to effectively train, Communications Training Officers (CTOs) need to

be critical forward thinking individuals with an ability to develop a training style that fits

all trainees regardless of his/her learning modality. Most trainers lack pedagogy

experience and rely on self-efficacy in their own skills, which is deeply rooted in the

training they initially received as a dispatcher.

Organizational dynamics are changing and the demands to establish public trust

are at the forefront of providing safety, service, and security to the public. As

communities legitimize the role of dispatchers, they are now recognized for the

significant role they play as key component of the “First Responders” team. A quality

Communications Training Officer (CTO) is a critical key component of any dispatch

training team. These individuals provide critical training so new dispatch trainees can

learn how to be that lifeline for the public, while still adhering to departmental policies

and procedures.

21

Chapter 3

Project Process

The intent of this project is to provide a roadmap to the Golden Gate

Communications Center (GGCC) Training Program for all the Communications

Training Officers (CTOs), Cadre and Associate Trainers, training at GGCC. This

training guide will establish the training framework CTOs can apply when establishing a

training plan for all new employees hired into the California Highway Patrol (CHP)

Public Safety Dispatch (PSD)/Public Safety Operator classifications at GGCC.

The Communications Centers Support Section (CCSS) has direct oversight of all

24 Communications/Dispatch Centers within the CHP and throughout the state, yet they

work independent of one another. Although the Department has standardized policies

and procedures they must adhere to, depending on the area’s geography and

responsibilities. This guide will provide the new and current GGCC In-House Training

Program CTOs a user-friendly resource reference which can assist with visualizing how

policy is translated into accurately completing a training assessment.

The GGCC currently suffers consistently from significant lack of retention

issues, the ability to retain new employees. This is attributable to multiple factors,

including but not limited to adequately trained CTOs. As the GGCC Training Manager,

previous CHP Academy Supervising Instructor, and resident expert having direct

oversight of CTO training, the author recognized that a paradigm shift was required in

order to solidify a standardized in-house Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST)

Basic Public Safety Dispatcher Module A and Module B training would be the first step

22

in the right direction. The current California Highway Patrol Manual (HPM) 60-5,

Communications Training Program Manual, does not provide a comprehensive

systematic visual guide for trainers to follow. Rather a trainer can find it verbose,

technical, and often hard to translate the intent into a viable legible document that meets

the Department’s standards. As such, it lacks interpretive value that could ease the

training process that often becomes cumbersome for supervision, the trainer, and the

trainee. This guide serves as a substantial resource for trainers, providing a simplified

visual breakdown, from start to finish, of the training process.

The content of the guide was a assembled from official sources which included

utilizing current California Highway Patrol (CHP) policies and procedures, Peace

Officers Standards and Training (POST) CTO course curriculum, CHP training and

survey forms, and a culmination of personal communications with California Highway

Patrol personnel directly related to the training process within the dispatch classifications

(management, supervisor, and past and present CTOs). This method of gathering

feedback provided invaluable results, bringing to the forefront innumerable predictable

and avertable shortcomings related to the GGCC Training Program.

The author collectively gathered, reviewed, and systematically organized all

informational resources based on the need of the prospective end-user. These included

training feedback surveys, applicable POST and CHP policies, and GGCC Standard

Operating Procedures. The author took on the tedious task of evaluating and extracting

from all contributing resources. Utilizing the book, How to write & prepare Training

Materials (Stimson, 2002), the author of this project was able to write to the reader and

23

present the pertinent detailed material on organizing a practical CTO training guide.

Any accumulated resources found to be irrelevant and not directly applicable to the

project were discarded. This section lists the remainder of the project chapters and

explains the importance of having them within the guide.

Organization of the Project

The remainder of this project, Roadmap to the Golden Gate Dispatch Training

Program, consists of 10 chapters that are in-depth and visually comprehensive for the

CTOs. Each provides the reasoning and need for the guide’s development, and the

potential substantive value it brings to GGCC’s in-house training. The chapters will

provide comprehensive written explanations and visual guides on each component of the

respective form covered in the chapter, how it correlates with the Department’s intent on

its use, and how to sufficiently and appropriately document each trainee’s progress

throughout the various stages of training.

Project Product

This Roadmap (see Appendix A) will serve as a Comprehensive

Communications Training Program Guide within the California Highway Patrol

Dispatch Community. The guide is divided into eight sections. The sections are as

follows:

Introduction. Chapter 1, Golden Gate Communications Center (GGCC)

Comprehensive Communications (CTO) Training Guide, provides a brief introduction to

Departmental Policy as it relates to the Communications Training Officer (CTO)

Program and the objective and purpose of the project. In addition, it outlines the role

24

and responsibilities of the CTO as they relate to the trainee, supervision, and

management within the GGCC Command.

Employee roles and responsibilities. Chapter 2, CTP Trainer Orientation,

discusses the goals, objectives, roles and responsibilities of the all those CTOs that will

be utilizing the CTO Training Guide as a tool for providing in-house training. The intent

of this training guide is to enhance the trainer’s ability to effectively execute their roles

in the training program and one-on-one trainee interaction while eliminating the stigma

within the CHP that often comes with training.

Organization. Chapter 3, CTP Trainer Orientation, of the guide delivers the

CTO an established set of CHP and GGCC training expectations and guidelines in order

to provide the most effective training possible to a new employee based on their module

and cycle in training. The chapter methodically lays out the Department and GGCC’s

training expectations in a manner that allows each trainer to focus on modifying their

training style based to the learning modality that is most effective for the trainee. The

detailed information encompasses all department designated training mandated during

each trainee’s probationary period.

Performance Evaluations – Module A. Chapter 4 and Chapter 5, CHP 157,

Communications Training Officer Program Daily Observation Report, for Module A

and B. These chapters are designed to provide the trainer a visual layout of the

organization of the guide along with a list of essential terminology related to the

Department and the training process. This section will provide a comprehensive written

and visual explanation and breakdown of each component of Module A, Service Desk

25

and Module B, Radio, training and the trainee’s evaluation process, the CHP 157, Daily

Observation Report. The trainer will be provided the following:

a. An understanding of the evaluation instruments

b. What to document

c. Examples of evaluations

End of Cycle Reports. Chapter 6 affords a comprehensive written and visual

explanation and break down of each component of the CHP 157A, Communications

Training Officer Program End of Cycle Report, evaluating the overall culmination of

either Cycles 1, 2, or 3 of the trainee’s Module A, Service Desk, or Module B, Radio,

training. The trainer will be provided the following:

a. An understanding of the evaluation instrument

b. What to document

c. Examples of evaluations

End of Module Reports/Final Evaluations. Chapter 7 delivers a comprehensive

written and visual explanation and break down of each component of the CHP 157D,

Communications Training Officer Program Final Evaluation – Service Desk, and the

CHP 157C, Communications Training Officer Program Final Evaluation – Radio,

evaluating the trainees ability to work independently. The trainer will be provided the

following:

a. An understanding of the evaluation instrument

b. What to document

c. Examples of evaluations

26

Remediation. Chapter 8 offers a comprehensive written and visual explanation

and break down of each component of the CHP 157B, Communications Training Officer

Program Remediation Plan, which provides trainers a strategically focused remedial

plan targeting a trainee’s deficient dispatching skills. This plan is written by a GGCC

Training Supervisor, implemented by a CTO, and intended to place training emphasis on

the trainee’s deficient critical tasks. The trainer will be provided the following:

a. An understanding of the evaluation instrument

b. Collectively highlighting deficient performance DOR documentation into quality

corrective training plan

c. Examples of remedial training plans

Performance Log. Chapter 9 is a comprehensive written and visual explanation

and break down of each component of the CHP 157E, Performance Log, for each Cycle

of the trainee’s Module A, Service Desk, or Module B, Radio, training. The trainer will

be provided the following:

d. An understanding of the evaluation instrument

e. Collectively highlights daily DOR performance ratings and Limbo Days

f. Examples of performance logs

Golden Gate Employee Trainee Guide. Chapter 10 is an all-inclusive GGCC

Employee Training Guide which establishes and sets achievable key milestones trainees

should be meeting during their Module A, Service Desk, and Module B, Radio Training.

A weekly training timeline for CTOs which strategically establishes training set

27

guidelines and position assignments throughout both Module A and B. Note: This is a

guide, not all trainees learn at the same pace.

Summary

Quality education will provide law enforcement agencies with CTOs who are

better equipped to handle critical tasks and in-turn will enhance their competency level

in training and directing others. Written and verbal communications, as well as

analytical abilities, will be heightened, improving overall interactions. The goal is to

reduce the California Highway Patrol’s retention problem through proactive in-house

standardized training. This training guide will expand awareness of dispatch training

principles and ultimately enable a CTO to provide more confident and efficient training.

The goal of this project is to provide a tool that is readily accessible to all CTOs

that can be easily relatable to the visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and tactile learner. In

order to accomplish this, the literature review depicts the evolution of learning in the

following categories: Education; Law Enforcement Training; and Dispatch Training.

28

Chapter 4

Conclusions and Recommendations

The Department has done its due diligence to standardize the process of Public

Safety Dispatch training for all 24 Communications/Dispatch Centers state-wide.

Although, in theory, each center should be able to operate exactly the same based on its

principles, the reality is that each center has challenges that are specifically unique

dispatch services based on the areas they provide services. As a department training

program, we continually profess the need to adjust training styles in order to

accommodate the learner. This is not only applicable to those new hires being trained,

but also the CTOs who are providing the training. The definition of insanity is when one

continues to do the something repeatedly, expecting different results (Howes, 2009).

The need for GGCC to evolve along with technology and understand the learner are two

key elements when establishing an effective and successful training program.

The authoring of this guide is critical to the success and retention of new

PSOs/PSDs throughout the completion of the 6- or 12-month probationary period.

Although CHP currently has departmental policy in place providing dispatch training

requirements, CTOs and Associate Trainers often find the details cumbersome, difficult

to interpret, and hard to apply on a daily basis while actively training. One important

aspect of this guide is that it simplifies the interpretation of the Department’s training

policy while simultaneously taking into consideration the CTOs/Associate Trainers

learning style and ability to translate and incorporate that information into their training

techniques.

29

The project originated from lack of structure and consistency among the various

trainers within the GGCC Training Program as it relates to their ability to independently

and effectively train and assess new hires throughout the various stages of training.

Unlike the sworn officers, who complete a 6-month in residence Academy prior to their

field assignment, the initial training process within the dispatch classifications consists

of a 6-month probationary period for PSOs and a 12-month probationary period for

PSDs. During this timeframe, each employee starts their first day at GGCC and receives

3 days of new hire orientation prior to attending the Academy.

In order to officially become a member of the department, each new hire is

required to complete numerous documents required by the Department and the State

Controller’s Office. In addition, the GGCC Training Program Supervisors or Managers

briefly overview the new hire job classification requirements and responsibilities which

will be embarked on throughout the authorized probationary period. Prior to departing

for their 3-week Public Safety Dispatcher Basic Course (PSDBC) Peace Officers

Standards and Training (POST), the new hires overview includes becoming acquainted

with a new language, CHP Aural Brevity, completing CHP Office of Development

Services (ODS) on-line training and POST Quarterly Continuous Professional Training

(CPT), and Service Desk and Radio sit-a-longs in order to become familiar with their

new profession.

Subsequently, those individuals hired into the PSOs and PSDs classifications

receive a total of 6 to 12 months of training while on probation. Reliant upon the PSO or

PSD’s ability to effectively learn, process, and practically apply those skills

30

independently will dedicate the duration of training required to achieve this goal. PSDs

will attend a total of 5-weeks of POST and Agency Specific Training at one of two

Academies, Academy North in West Sacramento, and Academy South at Ben Clark

Training Center in Riverside (PSOs only attend the first 3-week training session). These

courses consist of Public Safety Dispatcher Basic Course (PSDBC) – Module A (Service

Desk Training), PSDBC – Module B (Radio Training), GGCC Area Specific In-House

Training, and hands-on one-on-one training with a CTO/Associate Trainer. PSOs

receive the same training initially, but not attend Module B (Radio Training) since the

job classification if for Service Desk only.

The current Department Policies and Procedures provide a training framework

that sets standards and expectations statewide for all 24-Dispatch/Communications

Centers. This policy does not take into consideration the various dispatching

requirements and needs based on area specific criteria which include topography,

inclement weather, metropolitan regains, rural areas, commute challenges, etc. Public

Trust and meeting the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) 9-1-1 call

answering standards while continuing to strive to meet the Department’s goal of

providing safety, service, and security to the people of California is continually at the

forefront of CHP’s mission.

Training and Retention Challenges

I. Dispatchers may have various reasons for quitting their position with the

department.

31

a. They may not realize how demanding the position is, causing an undue

hardship or a strain on their personal life.

b. New dispatchers may have personality conflicts with their trainer or

generational challenges that present themselves during training and are

not easily resolved.

c. Learning a new job can be a shock to a new dispatcher’s confidence and

self-esteem, resulting in the individual becoming more introverted.

d. The ability to deal with individuals in crisis, comprehend, and apply the

Departmental training provided to real life scenarios does not always

mean that a new dispatcher can execute their training effectively on a

routine basis.

II. Trainers may be reluctant to train even though they have the training and

skillset to provide outstanding training.

a. New and tenured trainers are not always confident in their abilities to

master their own dispatch skillset and are apprehensive about passing that

trait onto newly hired dispatchers.

b. The liability of ensuring that new dispatchers learn and implement

information in accordance with the Departments Policy and Procedures

can be a trainer’s fear.

c. Trainers also assume legal liability and can be subject to criminal and

civil litigation for training not conducted under the scope of departmental

policy.

32

d. Trainers often lack the ability to accurately reflect a trainee’s

performance in written format on a Daily Observation Report. This

includes choosing a Daily Objective, appropriately marking critical tasks,

writing and then rating the performance, and providing constructive

feedback.

e. Dispatchers are frequently critical of trainer’s ability to provide adequate

training and typically voice it on the dispatch floor in front of trainees.

f. Tenured dispatchers constantly criticize a new trainer’s lack of experience

and question their ability to provide thorough, relevant, and effective

training.

g. The process of training typically intimidates dispatchers who have never

trained before.

III. Supervision and Management can contribute to a dispatch trainee’s success

or failure.

a. Supervision is often times bogged down trying to complete administrative

paperwork that takes their focus away from training.

b. Training programs in a Communications Center are often times not built

on a solid foundation.

c. Upper management does not appear to always be consistent with

standards as they apply to trainers or trainees.

d. Final evaluations, which should be conducted by supervision are often

times deferred to a trainer, resulting in biased results.

33

e. Trainers who may find a deficiency are quick to call it quits when training

new hires, when supervision should step in and conduct a comprehensive

assessment of the trainer’s abilities to provide effective training to the

trainee.

f. Due to lack of understanding of what is expected of them, trainers would

rather give up than try a new technique in order to assist the new hires

success.

IV. Standardized Training has proven to establish a logical systematic process

that provides a desired outcome for educating trainees.

a. Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST)

i. Entry Level Training

1. Public Safety Dispatch Basic Course Module A

2. Public Safety Dispatch Basic Course Module B

ii. Quarterly Continuous Professional Training (CPT)

1. Health and Wellness

2. Workplace Violence

3. Computer Aided Dispatch Refresher Training

4. Best Practices of Good Training

iii. Advanced Training

1. Communications Training Officer (CTO)

2. Advanced CTO

3. CTO Development Tools for Trainers

34

4. Leadership, Mentoring, and Coaching

5. Academy Instructor Certification Course

6. Intermediate Instructor Course

7. Advanced Instructor Course

b. Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA)

i. Best Practices

ii. Quality Assurance

c. CHP Departmental Training

i. POST Quarterly Continuous Professional Training

ii. California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System

(CLETS)

iii. Quarterly Public Trust Commander’s Hour

iv. Dispatch Courtroom Testimony

v. Active Shooter

vi. Shot Spotter

vii. Crisis Intervention

viii. Critical Incident Training

ix. Cyber Security

x. Sexual Harassment Training

xi. Substance Abuse Training

xii. Public Records and Privacy Act Training

35

xiii. Cultural Awareness Training

xiv. Defensive Drivers Training

Summary

All individuals are not necessarily innately equipped with multi-tasking skills,

having the ability to simultaneously handle various tasks at the same time. However, for

those that are, this guide will allow the CTOs to focus on honing their training skills

while ensuring their trainee receives accurate reflection of their performance on a daily

basis. This guide provides the GGCC Training Program the ability to establish a reliable

foundation of training guidelines for each CTO.

The guide is a dynamic document that is a depiction of current department

policies and procedures. The Department policy reviews are conducted every six

months and revisions occur when needed. This guide will be reviewed and updated as

policy changes and/or new training material or techniques need to be incorporated.

Evaluating the quality of written training documentation will serve as a testing

mechanism to identify the effectiveness of the guide. In addition, the ability and

efficiency of the CTO to adhere to the guidelines set forth in the guide while actively

training. Ultimately, the implementation and use of GGCC’s new training guide should

provide direct feedback as to the level of its success.

36

Appendix A

COMPREHENSIVE

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER

PROGRAM GUIDE

37

38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM (CTP) ..................................4

General ...............................................................................................................4

Purpose ..............................................................................................................4

2. CTP TRAINER ORIENTATION ......................................................................5

General ...............................................................................................................5

Purpose ...............................................................................................................5

3. CTP TRAINEE ORIENTATION ......................................................................7

General ...............................................................................................................7

Purpose ...............................................................................................................7

Trainers ..............................................................................................................7

Training Supervisors ..........................................................................................8

New Hire Orientation Schedule ........................................................................ 8

4. MODULE A, SERVICE DESK ........................................................................9

General ...............................................................................................................9

GGCC Module A - Classroom Training, Week 1 – Syllabus ..........................10

GGCC Module A – Classroom Training Week 2 – Syllabus ..........................11

CHP 157, Daily Observation Report, (DOR) .................................................12

Common Issues with DORs .............................................................................12

- 1 -

39

Example of a Poorly Written DOR – Front Page ............................................15

Example of a Poorly Written DOR – Back Page ............................................16

Example of a Well Written DOR – Front Page ...............................................17

Example of a Well Written DOR – Back Page ................................................18

5. MODULE B, RADIO ......................................................................................19

General .............................................................................................................19

GGCC Module B – Classroom Training Syllabus ...........................................20

Module B, Radio Training Cycles – Assignments...........................................21

CHP 157, Daily Observation Report, (DOR) ..................................................22

Common Issues with DORs .............................................................................22

Example of a Poorly Written DOR – Front Page ............................................24

Example of a Poorly Written DOR – Back Page ............................................25

Example of a Well Written DOR – Front Page ...............................................26

Example of a Well Written DOR – Back Page ................................................27

6. END OF CYCLE REPORT.............................................................................28

General .............................................................................................................28

Example of Poorly Written CHP 157A – Module A, Service Desk ...............29

Example of Well Written CHP 157A – Module A, Service Desk ...................30

Example of Poorly Written CHP 157A – Module B, Radio ............................31

Example of Well Written CHP 157A – Module B, Radio ...............................32

- 2 -

40

7. END OF MODULE/FINAL EVALUATION ........................................................33

General .............................................................................................................33

Example of a Poorly Written CHP 157D – Service Desk ..............................34

Example of Well Written CHP 157D – Service Desk .....................................35

Example of Poorly Written CHP 157C – Radio ..............................................36

Example of Well Written CHP 157C – Radio .................................................37

8. REMEDIAL TRAINING PLAN - MODULE A/MODULE B .......................38

General .............................................................................................................38

Example of Poorly Written CHP 157B – Service Desk ..................................39

Example of Well Written CHP 157B – Service Desk ....................................40

Example of Poorly Written CHP 157B – Radio ..............................................41

Example of Well Written CHP 157B – Radio .................................................42

9. PERFORMANCE LOG ...................................................................................43

General .............................................................................................................43

Example of Poorly Written CHP 157B – Service Desk or Radio ...................44

Example of Well Written CHP 157B – Service Desk or Radio ......................45

10. EMPLOYEE TRAINING GUIDE .................................................................46

General .............................................................................................................46

Service Desk ....................................................................................................47

Radio ................................................................................................................57

- 3 -

41

CHAPTER 1

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM (CTP)

1. GENERAL.

a. Background. The intent of this comprehensive guide is to provide a

written and visual resource for all trainers to standardize and assist with

the training process for all new hires, regardless of their current

experience in classification, aptitude, or tenure as a trainer. The

Department hires dispatchers from a widely diverse group of individuals

who have applied for and successfully past the most current approved

California Human Resources (CalHr) Critical Test, which is administered

by the California Highway Patrol (CHP) Department’s Selections

Standards and Examinations Section (SSES) approved proctors. Golden

Gate Communications Center (GGCC) on a yearly basis averages hiring

approximately 25-30 new dispatchers. This does not include: Public

Safety Operators (PSOs) who previously demoted and want to reinstate to

the Public Safety Dispatch (PSD) classification; reinstated employees

who changed job classifications within the Department, but subsequently

decided they want to return to the PSD classification series; or individuals

who have separated or retired and decided for personal or professional

reasons to reinstate.

b. Objective. Attrition is a challenge that most CHP Communications/

Dispatch Centers are consistently coping with on a routine basis each

year. This is attributable to the arduous training process, cognitive level

of those hired, the learning modality spectrum in which each trainee falls,

and the Communications Training Officer’s (CTO) ability to adjust their

training style to which best suits each trainee’s ability to learn new job-

related skills. Secondary is how the impact of transfers, demotions,

resignations, retirements, and in extreme cases Rejections During

Probation (RDPs) has on the center.

2. PURPOSE. The goal of this guide is to impart each CTO with a condensed

streamlined standardized process that follows department policy, yet establishes

an easy, reliable, go-to resource reference which provides effective training

strategies throughout Module A, Call-Taking, and Module B, Radio training.

Note: All employees involved in the training process must understand the importance of

reading, comprehending, and utilizing HPM 60.1, Communications Operations Manual,

and HPM 60.5, Communications Training Manual.

- 4 -

42

CHAPTER 2

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM (CTP)

TRAINER ORIENTATION

1. GENERAL.

a. Background. The responsibility of Golden Gate Communications Center

(GGCC) Trainer Orientation is to ensure new Communications Training

Officers (CTOs) receive a formal introduction to the varied

responsibilities and inherent liability associated with training an entry-

level dispatcher.

b. Objective. This chapter provides each new CTO a generalized overview

of their new role and the various requirements inherited with the position.

The role encompasses providing one-on-one practical hands-on training,

while being a role model, mentor, coach, counselor, resource, and peer.

CTOs must have a clear understanding of department dispatch policies

and procedures, effectively modifying instructions to maximize the

comprehension of the learner, and accurately assessing and documenting

whether the performance meets the required critical tasks.

2. PURPOSE.

Provide all CADRE/associate CTOs an understanding of how the GGCC

Training Program is structured. A CTO Training Team consists of the CTO, a

trainee (the individual being trained), a GGCC Training Supervisor, and when

needed the Training Manager. The program is multi-faceted and requires each

CTO to understand the process of completing policy mandated reports according

to department policy, and within established timelines. The GGCC Training

Supervisors teach CTOs the importance of establishing and calendaring projected

position assignments, demonstrate how to navigate accessible on-line resources,

and provide strategies to overcome the common pitfalls experienced by other

CTOs when assessing and documenting each trainee’s performance in writing.

a. Module A – Service Desk, Cycle 1-3 – A CTO Training Packet consists

of the following:

i. Roadmap to the Golden Gate Communications Training Program

ii. Training Calendar for the Cycle (Training Days, Limbo Days, Ride

Alongs, and position assignments)

- 5 -

43

iii. CHP 157, Daily Observation Report

iv. CHP 157S, Call-Taking Checklist

v. CHP 157E, Performance Log

vi. CHP 157A, End of Cycle Report

vii. Copy of Highway Patrol Manual (HPM) 60.5, Communications

Training Program, Chapter 4, Training and Evaluation, Annex G

b. Module B - Radio, Cycle 1-3 – A CTO Training Packet consists of the

following:

i. Roadmap to the Golden Gate Communications Training Program

ii. Training Calendar for the Cycle (Training Days, Limbo Days, Ride

Alongs, and position assignments)

iii. CHP 157, Daily Observation Report

iv. CHP 157R, Call-Taking Checklist

v. CHP157A, End of Cycle Report

vi. CHP 157E, Performance Log

vii. Copy of Highway Patrol Manual (HPM) 60.5, Communications

Training Program, Chapter 4, Training and Evaluation, Annex G

- 6 -

44

CHAPTER 3

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM (CTP)

TRAINEE ORIENTATION

1. GENERAL.

a. Trainees. These are individuals who have successfully applied for the

position of Public Safety Dispatcher (PSD), passed the Department’s

required examination, interviewed, and passed the arduous and lengthy

background process. Once hired, the PSD and Public Safety Operator

(PSO) trainees will embark on a 6- to 10-month rigorous training program

with the ultimate achievement is to successfully complete the training and

work independently while serving the public. Their training consists of

the following:

b. Module A

i. A 3-week, 120-hour Peace Officers Standards and Training

(POST) and agency specific Academy Call-Taking Dispatcher

Training.

ii. A two-week GGCC In-House area-specific training.

iii. Three cycles consisting of a minimum of 120-hours each with a

one-on-one trainer(s), excluding remedial training if needed.

c. Module B (PSD only)

i. A 2-week 80-hour POST and agency specific Academy Radio

Dispatcher Training.

ii. A one-week GGCC in-house area specific training.

iii. Three cycles consisting of between minimum of 120-hours and no

more than 204 hours, excluding remedial training if needed.

2. PURPOSE. Provides Communications Training Officers (CTOs) an overview on

how the new hire’s/trainee’s training will be structured from day one as a

dispatcher until he/she completes their required training, prior to the end of the

required 6- or 12-month probationary period (PSOs are 6 months and PSDs are

12-months).

3. TRAINERS. Those informal leaders who willingly devote their time to develop,

mentor, and coach new hires. Trainers have very diversified backgrounds, levels

- 7 -

45

of experience, and they are the very core to a successful training program. The

GGCC Training Program PSDs and PSOs who volunteer for as a GGCC Trainer

may require additional training, developing, and mentoring from the GGCC

Training Supervisors; not all trainers have the skills or tools required to succeed

as a trainer.

4. TRAINING SUPERVISORS. The GGCC Training Program has two assigned

Public Safety Dispatch Supervisor Is (PSDSIs). Their role is multi-faceted and

carries many responsibilities. In addition to handling the day-to-day training

requirements for new hires and reinstatements, which includes coordinating New

Hire training, travel, scheduling, area-specific in-house training, trainer

assignments, daily position assignments, Quarterly POST Continuous

Professional Training (CPT), Division Commander’s Hour Training, and

department on-line training.

5. NEW HIRE ORIENTATION SCHEDULE.

NEW HIRE ORIENTATION

SCHEDULE

TIME Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

0700-0800

TOUR OF FACILITY/

OATH OF

ALLEGIANCE

AURAL BREVITY

FLASH CARDS

AURAL BREVITY

FLASH CARDS

0800-0900

FIRST DAY

PAPERWORK/TIME

USED

SIT A LONG

SIT A LONG

0900-1000

BENEFITS

318 SQUAD CLUB &

BARGAINING UNIT 7

SIGN ON TO LAN/CAD

1200-1230 LUNCH LUNCH LUNCH

1230-1330

AURAL BREVITY

FLASH CARDS

DEFENSIVE DRIVING

ON-LINE COURSE

PEER SUPPORT/STRESS

MANAGEMENT

1330-1430

READING

HPM ETC

READING

HPM ETC

EXPECATIONS OF

TRAINING /415S

1445-1530

AURAL BREVITY

QUIZ

AURAL BREVITY

QUIZ

AURAL BREVITY TEST

- 8 -

46

CHAPTER 4

CHP 157

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER PROGRAM (CTP)

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

MODULE A, SERVICE DESK

1. GENERAL.

a. Background. Module A – Service Desk is the first of a two-part Golden

Gate Communications Center (GGCC) in-house dispatch training

program. The trainee receives a 3-week 120-hour Peace Officers

Standards and Training (POST) and Agency Specific Public Safety

Dispatcher Basic Course Academy Service Desk Dispatch at the

Academy. Once the trainee returns to GGCC, he/she will receive a two-

week GGCC In-House area specific training.

b. Objective. This Module allows CTOs to assist their trainee with

establishing a dispatch foundation by learning how to appropriately

process, in accordance with department policy, incoming calls for service

from the public and allied agencies. Over the duration of three 12-day

cycles on the 4-10 Alternate Work Week shifts, the trainees will receive

CHP 157s, Daily Observation Reports (DORs), which will reflect their

progress and proficiency in the first seven critical tasks listed on the

DOR.

i. Poorly written DORs do not accurately depict a trainee’s daily

performance.

ii. Well written DORs provide an accurate summary of a trainee’s

daily performance.

iii. Writing the Trainer’s Comments first and then providing the Daily

Ratings for the Critical Tasks performed ensures the trainees

receive ratings based on his/her documented performance.

- 9 -

47

2. GGCC MODULE A – CLASSROOM TRAINING, WEEK 1 – SYLLABUS.

GGCC MODULE A – CLASSROOM TRAINING

WEEK 1 - SYLLABUS

- 10 -

0900-1200

1200-1230

1230-1330

1330-1730

0900-1200

1200-1230

1230-1730

0900-1200

1200-1230

1230-1730

0900-1200

1200-1230

1230-1730

0900-1200

1200-1230

1230-1545

1545-1730

CLETS

DAY 5Lunch

CLETS

MIS

DAY 4

DMV

Lunch

DMV

DAY 3

CAD Review & Scenarios

Lunch

CAD Review & Scenarios

CAD Functions & Creating Logs

Week One

DAY 2

CAD Functions & Creating Logs

Lunch

Call Documentation

DAY 1

Telephone Techniques

Lunch

Telephone Techniques

48

3. GGCC MODULE A – CLASSROOM TRAINING, WEEK 2 – SYLLABUS.

GGCC MODULE A – CLASSROOM TRAINING

WEEK 2 – SYLLABUS

Week Two

- 11 -

0900-1200

1200-1230

1230-1730

0900-1200

1200-1230

1230-1730

0900-1200

1200-1230

1230-1430

1330-1545

1545-1730

0900-1200

1200-1230

1230-1545

1545-1730

0900-1200

1200-1230

1230-1730

DAY 4

Live Calls

Lunch

Aural Brevity Quiz

Emergency Action Plan

DAY 5

Live Calls

Live Calls

Lunch

DAY 3

Lunch

Geography Review

Games

Aural Brevity

DAY 2

CAD Review & Scenarios

Lunch

CAD Review & Scenarios

Telephone Operations Review

DAY 1

Vesta & CAD Log Geo Verification

Lunch

Vesta & CAD Log Geo Verification

49

4. CHP 157, DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT (DOR).

a. Purpose of Critical Tasks: These are required elements that each trainee

must be able to perform in order to meet the departments standard of

acceptable progress.

b. Daily Ratings: Assign a numerical value on the trainee’s performance for

the day.

1 - Unacceptable

2 – Needs Improvement

3 - Satisfactory

NR – Not Rated

c. Daily Objective: A specific achievable goal or task.

5. COMMON ISSUES WITH DORS:

a. No Daily Objective

b. Critical Task Marked NR

c. Critical Task subsections not checked for observed/documented

performance

d. Comments do not match ratings (Write first and then rate)

e. Not routinely providing and documenting assessments

f. Typically fails to set achievable goals

g. Missing trainee and trainer’s signatures

h. Timely review of trainee performance by CTO

i. Timely completion of DORs

j. Timely issue/signing of DORs

k. Missing supervisor’s comments

l. Missing supervisor’s signature

EXAMPLES OF POORLY

WRITTEN OBJECTIVES

EXAMPLES WELL

WRITTEN OBJECTIVES

None listed (Must list a service desk related task, be

specific)

Master the Basics Retain basic call taking information in

order to apply it daily in training

Type or Typing Creating logs in timely fashion while

typing and talking

- 12 -

50

EXAMPLES OF POORLY

WRITTEN OBJECTIVES

EXAMPLES WELL

WRITTEN OBJECTIVES

Professionalism or

Improve professionalism on telephone Professionalism by utilizing appropriate

dictation by eliminating “likes and umms” Timeliness Create a CAD with pertinent information

and route it to the correct radio or transfer

it to the appropriate agency in a timely

manner

Keep up on a “rain” day Process incoming calls for service in a

timely manner, obtaining all required

information, while remaining polite,

professional, and courteous

Dispatch Ear Work on developing your dispatch ear

through active listening while caller is

providing pertinent information

Self-reliance Work independently, with little or no

assistance for the trainer

Policy Familiarize yourself with call-taking

training guidelines and Departmental

Policy

Aural Brevity Utilize appropriate aural brevity codes

when handling calls for service and type

coding CAD logs

Clean up logs to read better for the radio

dispatcher

Document pertinent information in CAD

log in a manner that can be easily

understood.

Make a log for everything Complete a log and list all pertinent

information in the comments field

Ask all appropriate questions Ask the caller all pertinent questions in

order to obtain and document accurate

information in a CAD log

Finish online training Complete required CLETS Training On-

Line

Abbreviations Practice utilizing department approved

abbreviations while documenting

information in CAD logs

Work Independently Work independently with minimal or any

assistance from the trainer

Listen better while on the telephone Master multitasking skills, simultaneously

obtaining information from the caller

while typing as the caller talks

- 13 -

51

EXAMPLES OF POORLY

WRITTEN OBJECTIVES EXAMPLES WELL

WRITTEN OBJECTIVES Further call taking practice Create logs in a timely fashion Service Desk Answer and process incoming public calls

for service Type Codes Asking all pertinent questions of a caller to

determine the proper CAD log type code

Make logs tell a story Accurately document pertinent information

received from a caller concisely into a CAD

log

Prepare for Assessment Conduct a review of service desk

responsibilities to ensure readiness for Final

Service Desk Evaluation

- 14 -

52

6. EXAMPLE OF A POORLY WRITTEN DOR – FRONT PAGE.

- 15 -

53

7. EXAMPLE OF A POORLY WRITTEN DOR – BACK PAGE.

- 16 -

54

8. EXAMPLE OF A WELL WRITTEN DOR – FRONT PAGE.

- 17 -

55

9. EXAMPLE OF A WELL WRITTEN DOR – BACK PAGE.

- 18 -

56

CHAPTER 5

CHP 157

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER PROGRAM (CTP)

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

MODULE B, RADIO

1. GENERAL.

a. Background. Module B – Radio is the second of a two-part Golden Gate

Communications Center (GGCC) in-house dispatch training program.

The trainee receives a 2-week 80-hour Peace Officers Standards and

Training (POST) and Agency Specific Public Safety Dispatcher Basic

Course Academy Radio Training at the Academy. Once the trainee

returns to GGCC, he/she will receive a one-week GGCC In-House area

specific training.

b. Objective. This Module allows CTOs to assist their trainee with

establishing a radio dispatch foundation by learning how to appropriately

radio dispatch and coordinate field unit responses to calls for service in

accordance with department policy. Over the duration of three 17-day

cycles, two cycles on the 4-10 and one cycle on the 3-12 Alternate Work

Week shifts, the trainees will receive CHP 157s, Daily Observation

Reports, which will reflect their progress and proficiency in all nine

critical tasks listed on the DOR.

i. Poorly written DORs do not accurately depict a trainee’s daily

performance.

ii. Well written DORs provide an accurate summary of a trainee’s

daily performance.

iii. Writing the Trainer Comments first and then providing the Daily

Ratings for the Critical Tasks performed ensures the trainees

receive ratings based on his/her documented performance.

- 19 -

57

2. GGCC MODULE B – CLASSROOM TRAINING - SYLLABUS.

GGCC MODULE B – CLASSROOM TRAINING

- 20 -

0900-1100

1100-1230

1230-1300

1300-1430

1430-1630

1630-1800

1800-1930

0900-1100

1100-1230

1230-1300

1300-1430

1430-1630

1630-1800

1800-1930

0900-1100

1100-1300

1300-1330

1330-1500

1500-1630

1630-1800

1800-1930

0900-1100

1100-1230

1230-1300

1300-1430

1430-1630

1630-1800

1800-1930

Santa Rosa

Marin

Lunch

Relief

DAY 2

Solano

Napa

Contra Costa

Lunch

Bronze

Freeway Service Patrol

HPM 60.1

GGCC Standard Operator Procedures

DAY 3

Aqua

Ruby

Lunch

Warrants

11-27s & 10-28s

Custodian of Records

Scenarios

DAY 4

Amber

San Francisco

Lunch

Emergency Radio Traffic

Radio System

Scenarios

Radio Cards

DAY 1

Radio Console

MPO

58

3. MODULE B, RADIO TRAINING CYCLES - ASSIGNMENTS.

RADIO TRAINING CYCLES CHART

Cycle 1 – 17 Days

(10 Hrs)

Cycle 2 – 17 Days

(10 Hrs)

Cycle 3 – 17 Days

(12 Hrs)

1st & 2nd Week – 2 Days

Per Radio

1st & 2nd Week – 2 Days

Per Radio

1st & 2nd Week – 2 Days

Per Radio

Violet Violet Master 2 / Relief 1

Pink Pink Relief 2

Amber Amber Relief 3

Emerald Emerald Master 1

3rd & 4th Week – 2 Days

Per Radio

3rd & 4th Week – 2 Days

Per Radio

3rd Week – 2 Days

Per Radio

Maroon Maroon FSP 1

Bronze Bronze FSP 2

Ruby or Aqua Ruby or Aqua Pink or Amber

Turq/Grp, Vio/Turq, or

Mar/Grp

Turq/Grp, Vio/Turq, or

Mar/Grp

Emerald or Bronze

4th Week – 2 Days

Per Radio

FSP 1

FSP 2

Pink or Amber

Emerald or Bronze

FSP 1

FSP 2

Pink or Amber

Emerald or Bronze

- 21 -

59

4. CHP 157, DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT (DOR).

a. Purpose of Critical Tasks: These are required elements that each trainee

must be able to perform in order to meet the Department’s standard of

acceptable progress.

b. Daily Ratings: Assign a numerical value on the trainee’s performance for

the day.

1 - Unacceptable

2 – Needs Improvement

3 - Satisfactory

NR – Not Rated

c. Daily Objective: Specific achievable daily task or goal.

5. COMMON ISSUES WITH DORS.

a. No Daily Objective

b. Critical Task Marked NR

c. Critical Task subsections not checked for observed/documented

performance

d. Comments do not match ratings (Write first and then rate)

e. Not routinely providing and documenting assessments

f. Typically fails to set achievable goals

g. Missing training and trainer’s signatures

h. Timely review of trainee performance by CTO

i. Timely completion of DORs

j. Timely issue/signing of DORs

k. Missing supervisor’s comments

l. Missing supervisor’s signature

EXAMPLES OF POORLY

WRITTEN OBJECTIVES

EXAMPLES OF WELL

WRITTEN OBJECTIVES

None Listed (Must list a radio dispatching related task, be

specific)

Master the Basics Retain basic dispatching information in order

to apply it daily in training

Type or Typing Type when the units provide incident

information over the air

- 22 -

60

EXAMPLES OF POORLY

WRITTEN OBJECTIVES

EXAMPLES OF WELL

WRITTEN OBJECTIVES

Geography Apply knowledge of CHP area line and

county beats when reviewing CAD logs and

assigning beat units

Timeliness Dispatch calls for service to appropriate beat

units in a timely manner

Work a “rain” day Keeping up with multiple units’ radio traffic

while simultaneously prioritizing and

dispatching numerous calls for service

Multitask Efficiently handle incoming radio traffic

while typing and talking, simultaneously

repeating the information to the field

Dispatch Ear Work on developing your dispatch ear

through active listening of incoming radio

traffic

Self-reliance Work independently, with little or no

assistance from the trainer

Policy Familiarize yourself with radio training

guidelines and departmental policy

Aural Brevity Utilize appropriate aural brevity codes when

dispatching calls or handling incoming radio

traffic from field units

Work a busy radio Keep up with busy radio traffic, take control

radio’s pace

Work Independently Work independently with minimal or any

assistance from the trainer

Listen better while on the telephone Master multitasking skills of simultaneously

working the radio while handling calls for

service

Abbreviations Practice utilizing department approved

abbreviations while documenting

information in CAD logs

Make logs tell a story Accurately document pertinent information

received from a caller concisely into a CAD

log

- 23 -

61

6. EXAMPLE OF A POORLY WRITTEN DOR – FRONT PAGE.

- 24 -

62

7. EXAMPLE OF A POORLY WRITTEN DOR – BACK PAGE.

- 25 -

63

8. EXAMPLE OF A WELL WRITTEN DOR – FRONT PAGE.

- 26 -

64

9. EXAMPLE OF A WELL WRITTEN DOR – BACK PAGE.

- 27 -

65

CHAPTER 6

CHP 157A

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER PROGRAM (CTP)

END OF CYCLE (EOC)

MODULE A, SERVICE DESK

AND

MODULE B, RADIO

1. GENERAL.

a. Background. End of Cycle (EOC) Reports are due at the end of each 12-

day cycle in Module A – Service Desk and 17-day cycle in Module B –

Radio. The trainee receives an evaluation from their CTO which

encapsulates their performance for the entire cycle, highlighting

strengths, emphasizing weaknesses, while providing strategies to achieve

attainable goals.

b. Objective. Provide the trainee with an overall summary of their training

performance during that cycle of training. This also allows the CTO to

document a trainee’s ongoing progression in training and make

recommendations on whether or not that individual’s performance

warrants being released to work independently, moving forward to the

next cycle of training, moving forward with remediation due to

deficiencies, or possibly being rejected during probation for failure to

meet performance standards.

i. A poorly written EOC does not accurately depict a trainee’s

performance throughout the training cycle.

ii. A well written EOC will accurately reflect the trainee’s

performance for the training cycle.

- 28 -

66

2. EXAMPLE OF A POORLY WRITTEN EOC REPORT – MODULE A.

- 29 -

67

3. EXAMPLE OF A WELL WRITTEN EOC REPORT – MODULE A.

- 30 -

68

4. EXAMPLE OF A POORLY WRITTEN EOC REPORT – MODULE B.

- 31 -

69

5. EXAMPLE OF A WELL WRITTEN EOC REPORT – MODULE B.

- 32 -

70

CHAPTER 7

CHP 157D, FINAL EVALUATION - SERVICE DESK

AND

CHP 157C, FINAL EVALUATION - RADIO

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER PROGRAM (CTP)

END OF MODULE EVALUATION

1. GENERAL.

a. Background. Service Desk and Radio trainees receive final evaluations,

administered after completing all three 12-day cycles in Module A,

Service Desk, and all three 17-day cycles in Module B, Radio. The

trainee receives a written and practical evaluation administered by an

assigned evaluator, a Golden Gate Communications Center’s (GGCC)

Public Safety Dispatch Supervisor I.

b. Objective. To provide the trainee an overall assessment, at the end of

Module A or Module B, on their ability to work independently and

perform in accordance with department policies and procedures. This

will determine whether or not the trainee can be released to work solo,

no longer requiring a trainer.

i. A poorly written Final Evaluation does not accurately depict a

trainee’s assessed performance.

ii. A well written Final Evaluation will accurately reflect the

trainee’s assessed performance.

- 33 -

71

2. EXAMPLE OF A POORLY WRITTEN CHP 157D, FINAL EVALUATION -

SERVICE DESK.

- 34 -

72

3. EXAMPLE OF A WELL WRITTEN CHP 157D, FINAL EVALUATION -

SERVICE DESK.

- 35 -

73

4. EXAMPLE OF A POORLY WRITTEN CHP 157C, FINAL EVALUATION -

RADIO.

- 36 -

74

5. EXAMPLE OF A WELL WRITTEN CHP 157D, FINAL EVALUATION -

RADIO.

- 37 -

75

CHAPTER 8

CHP 157B

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER PROGRAM (CTP)

REMEDIAL PLAN

MODULE A-SERVICE DESK

AND

MODULE B-RADIO

1. GENERAL.

a. Background. The Remedial Plan is a training tool intended for use only

when a trainee develops of pattern resulting in his/her performance

dropping below the rating of “Meets Performance Standards” on multiple

CHP 157s, Daily Observation Reports (DORS).

b. Objective. The Remedial Plan is a tool utilized by the Training

Supervisor when the trainee consistently shows a pattern of deficiency in

one or more critical tasks. The Training Supervisor has the ability to

freeze the trainee’s regular training cycle and place the trainee in

remediation in order to provide him/her focused training specific to the

deficient critical tasks. The trainee is provided a CTO who specializes in

remediating deficient trainees and the ability to modify his/her training

style to the learning modalities that work best for the trainee.

i. A poorly written Remedial Plan does not typically provide well

articulated problem identification, layout a viable an action plan,

or set achievable goals focused on the trainee’s deficiencies.

ii. A well written Remedial Plan thoroughly identifies any problem

areas that are causing the training to be deficient, provides a

viable correction action plan, and sets achievable goals that

should improve the trainee’s performances.

- 38 -

76

2. POORLY WRITTEN REMEDIAL PLAN – SERVICE DESK.

- 39 -

77

3. WELL WRITTEN REMEDIAL PLAN – SERVICE DESK.

- 40 -

78

4. POORLY WRITTEN REMEDIAL PLAN – RADIO.

- 41 -

79

5. WELL WRITTEN REMEDIAL PLAN – RADIO.

- 42 -

80

CHAPTER 9

CHP 157E

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING OFFICER PROGRAM (CTP)

PERFORMANCE LOG

MODULE A – SERVICE DESK

AND

MODULE B - RADIO

1. GENERAL.

a. Background. The Performance Log is a month-at-a-glance of the ratings

given a trainee in all Critical Task on each CHP 157, Daily Observation

Report, (DOR). The form provides a list of Critical Tasks along with a

slot for each rating received that is reflected on the trainee’s DOR and

corresponds with their individual daily performance.

b. Objective. This is a tool which is utilized by the Golden Gate

Communications Center (GGCC) Training Program to assist the Training

Supervisor and Communications Training Officer (CTO) with tracking

the trainee’s daily DOR ratings as well as any anomalies, also known as

Limbo Days (trainee out sick, on a ride along, removed from training due

to staffing shortages, etc.). The ability to track limbo days is imperative

when calculating actual training time received by the trainee. The

Training Supervisor must ensure that all DORs are turned in timely and

trainees receive a minimum of 120 hours of one-on-one training with a

trainer in Module A, Service Desk, and 170 hours in Module B, Radio.

i. A poorly documented Performance Log does not typically

provide an accurate accounting of the number of days a trainee

received training, the ratings, any limbo days, and whether any

DORs are missing within a Module training cycle. Missing DORs

can be problematic if a trainee’s performance falls below Meets

Performance Standards.

ii. A well-documented Performance Log does provide an accurate

accounting of the number of days a trainee was trained, their

ratings, whether any DORs are missing, and reflects any limbo

days used within that Module training cycle.

- 43 -

81

2. CHP 157E, PERFORMANCE LOG, MODULE A, SERVICE DESK OR

MODUBLE B, RADIO - POORLY DOCUMENTED.

- 44 -

82

3. CHP 157E, PERFORMANCE LOG, MODULE A, SERVICE DESK OR

MODUBLE B, RADIO - WELL DOCUMENTED.

- 45 -

83

CHAPTER 10

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING PROGRAM (CTP)

GOLDEN GATE EMPLOYEE TRAINING GUIDE

1. GENERAL.

a. Background. The Golden Gate Employee Training Guide establishes

training timeline expectations for trainees. The Communications

Training Officer (CTO) will gain a better understanding of how their

trainee should be progressing each week throughout the training cycles

and each Module.

b. Objective. Creates for CTOs a viable training expectation timeline for

trainees. This can be subjective based on the instructional abilities of the

CTO and the learning aptitude of the trainee. Ideally, this training tool

assists CTOs in modifying their instruction so trainees can meet required

milestones at predetermined points during training.

- 46 -

84

Employee Training Guideline Note: “Guidelines” are included primarily for the use of the trainee, the

Communications Training Officer (CTO), the Shift Supervisors, and the Training Unit. They are included in this package to ensure that the trainee is aware of what is expected of them at all times.

Module A – Service Desk Training includes a minimum of three (3) one-on-one 120-hour training cycles. Prior to the trainee beginning second cycle of training, the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) workbook must be completed. It would be wise to utilize a limbo day as an assigned day for the trainee to work on their CLETS workbook. Daily work assignment trades and shift trades will not be allowed until the completion of the probation period. The assignment of overtime will not be allowed until after the trainee has been released from service desk training.

MODULE A – SERVICE DESK 1st Week New Employee Orientation 2nd Week Initial Communications Training Academy – through Public Safety Dispatch Basic Course - Module A 4th Week ** Academy: Training Reports Daily 5th Week GGCC Classroom Training, Week 1 – Service Desk (Group Training) **Trainer: No Training Reports 6th Week GGCC Classroom Training, Week 2 – Service Desk (Group Training) **Trainer: No Training Reports 7th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 1, Week 1 (One-on-One with trainer) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 8th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 1, Week 2 (One-on-One with trainer) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily

- 47 -

85

9th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 1, Week 3 (One-on-One with trainer) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 10th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 1, Week 4 (One-on-One with trainer) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily Performance Log (CHP 157E) End of Cycle Report (CHP 157A) – Cycle 1 Guideline #1 By the end of the 10th week:

a. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to accept and apply the constructive criticism provided by the trainer and/or supervisor(s).

b. The trainee should have the telephone scripts provided through Module A

training committed to memory. c. The trainee should have knowledge of basic Computer Aided Dispatch

(CAD) log construction and be able to initiate and route a CAD incident log within an adequate time frame.

d. The trainee should be able to recognize and use the appropriate type

codes as it relates to traffic collisions, hazards and reckless versus drunk drivers.

e. The trainee should know the criteria for stolen vehicle reports and when

the incident requires the response of a field unit. f. The trainee should be able to process a lost/stolen plate report. g. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to complete a basic storage or

impound.

h. The trainee should have the ability to process a driver’s license check and locate the identification number, address and whether the license is valid.

- 48 -

86

i. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to complete a license plate check and locate the registered owner, pending master file and leaser information, as well as year, make and vehicle identification number (VIN) of the vehicle or motorcycle.

j. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to utilize the BOLOS powerline command to enter individuals as hospitalized or arrested into the CAD database system, inclusive of entering and running parties.

k. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency of the Aural Brevity codes.

l. The trainee should comprehend the configuration of each area location

code and area prefix.

m. The trainee should be familiar with the counties within communications center’s jurisdiction and the CHP area offices responsible for such.

n. The trainee should be aware of the importance of Occupational Safety in

our daily operation and practice good safety habits, including proper adjustment of ergonomic equipment to meet his/her needs.

o. The trainee should demonstrate familiarity with VESTA and its functions.

p. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to research and retrieve in

“Incident Editor” filed incident logs.

q. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to summarize incidents working in each individual area.

11th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 2, Week 1 (One-on-One with trainer) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 12th Week Service Desk Training, Cycle 2, Week 2 (One-on-One with trainer) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily

- 49 -

87

Guideline #2 By the end of the 12th week:

a. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to accept and apply the constructive criticism provided by the trainer and/or supervisor(s).

b. The trainee should be familiar with the local allied agencies within

communication center’s jurisdiction. c. The trainee should demonstrate familiarity of the CAD key functions,

Emergency Call Taking (ECT) Screen, and Incident Editor. d. The trainee should demonstrate basic knowledge of the bordering

communications centers and adjacent area offices.

e. The trainee should demonstrate basic knowledge of how to view areas when handling in-coming calls for service.

f. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency of the Aural Brevity codes.

g. The trainee should have basic knowledge of information necessary for in-

progress and/or moving incidents. 13th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 2, Week 3 (One-on-One with trainer) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 14th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 2, Week 4 (One-on-One with trainer) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily Performance Log (CHP 157E) End of Cycle Report (CHP 157A) – Cycle 2 Guideline #3 By the end of the 14th week:

a. The trainee should demonstrate acceptance and applications of constructive criticism provided by the trainer and/or supervisor(s).

- 50 -

88

b. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency of the Aural Brevity codes. c. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency of the CAD key functions. d. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency of the bordering

communications centers and area offices.

e. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to thoroughly research and locate a vehicle based on the party’s name when the license plate or vehicle identification numbers (VINs) are unavailable.

f. The trainee should be able to construct a CAD incident log in a timely and

sensible manner utilizing the appropriate GEO syntax with little assistance from his/her trainer.

g. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to research information

utilizing the “Incident Editor” function.

h. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency of the bordering communications centers and adjacent area offices.

i. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency with the VESTA and its

functions.

j. The trainee must demonstrate acceptance and application of constructive criticism provided by his/her trainer and/or supervisor(s).

k. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to compose a log accurately and promptly, utilizing appropriate CAD abbreviations that are commonplace for service desk and route to the appropriate radio with little to no assistance from his/her trainer.

15th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 3, Week 1 **Introduction to Call Out, Text to 9-1-1, and ShotSpotter (One-on-One/Side-by-Side with trainer)

**Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 16th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 3, Week 2

Introduction to Stolen Vehicle Desk, Stolen Vehicle System (SVS), and Certified Electronic Record Training System (CERT)

- 51 -

89

(One-on-One with Trainer – 2 days at Stolen Vehicle Desk) Call Out at least once during the week (Side-by-side w/Trainer)

**Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 17th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 3, Week 3

Call Out and Stolen Vehicle Desk once each during the week (Trainer side-by-side monitoring from afar) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 18th Week Service Desk Training – Cycle 3, Week 4

Call Out and Stolen Vehicle Desk once each during the week (Trainer monitoring from afar) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily

Performance Log (CHP 157E) End of Cycle Report (CHP 157A) – Cycle 3 Call-Taking Checklist (CHP 157S)

End of Module/Final Evaluation (CHP 157D) Guideline #4 By the end of the 18th week:

a. Trainees should have received a basic overview of the CLETS, SVS, and CERT applications used. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to locate complete registered owner, leaser and pending master file records and release of liabilities, as well as the year, make and VIN of the vehicle.

b. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to complete a cellular

telephone trace.

l. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency with the BOLOS powerline command to enter individuals as hospitalized or arrested into the CAD database system, inclusive of entering and running parties.

c. , inclusive of entering and running parties.

d. The trainee should demonstrate familiarity with rotating tow trucks for

working incidents and utilizing the appropriate cancellation codes.

- 52 -

90

e. The trainee should be familiar with the Wanted Persons System (WPS), as well as the information needed to process a local county warrant check and a criminal history.

f. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency of the Aural Brevity codes and abbreviations utilizing them appropriately in the composition of a CAD incident log.

g. Trainees must be cognizant of the numbers of the freeway systems handled by communications center and their directions of travel.

h. The trainee should be cognizant of the local allied agencies within communications center’s jurisdiction.

i. The use of the Thomas Guides, Compass Maps, and CAD Maps should be accurate, with little or no delay when looking up locations and/or beats.

j. The trainee should successfully demonstrate service desk skills, being able to work independently of their trainer.

k. Trainees must know radio frequency colors, area prefixes, area numbers, and position numbers in the operations floor.

l. Practical applications of CAD functions and typing skills must be demonstrated.

m. The trainee must demonstrate acceptance and application of constructive criticism provided by the trainer and/or supervisor(s).

n. The trainee must demonstrate basic knowledge of the Amber Alert Network and the ability to properly document and route the incident.

o. The trainee must demonstrate basic knowledge of the notification process to the shift supervisors, as well the California State Emergency Notification Tactical Alert Center (ENTAC).

p. The trainee must demonstrate basic knowledge of the waterways within

communications center’s jurisdiction.

q. The trainee must demonstrate the ability to perform a cross-directory check.

- 53 -

91

r. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency in rotating tow trucks for working incidents and utilizing the appropriate cancellation codes.

s. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to maintain control of a

telephone conversation in a professional manner while extracting pertinent information and documenting a CAD incident log in a timely and sensible manner.

t. The trainee shall be evaluated by an Independent Evaluator (shift

supervisor) for release from service desk training.

u. The trainee may sign up for pre-planned voluntary overtime.

Training Reminders:

a. Service desk training consists of three cycles. Each cycle consists of 4 weeks, twelve 10-hour days, of one-on-one instruction. Once trainees return from the Academy Public Safety Dispatcher Basic Course, they receive 2 weeks of GGCC area-specific in-house training. All training days will be coordinated and tracked by one of the GGCC Training Program Supervisors. Each 4-week period, the trainee can be expected to have at least one limbo day which in turn will be used for introduction or re-introduction to policy and/or procedures, studying, ride-a-longs, sit-a-longs, etc.

b. An End of Cycle Report written by the trainer is required at the end of

each cycle of training. If the trainee is being rated unacceptable in any critical task, the situation and the trainee should be scrutinized very closely, keeping in mind that we have a possible candidate for remedial service desk training and/or rejection during probation. It is very important that the trainee being rated unacceptable, understands explicitly how crucial this rating is.

c. The trainer and trainee will meet at a minimum on a bi-weekly basis with

a training supervisor to discuss the trainee’s progression, as well as any issues and/or concerns which need to be addressed.

d. The trainee’s performance must be assessed by an independent

evaluator (shift supervisor) prior to being released from service desk training and available for independent operation on service desk. The evaluator will

- 54 -

92

perform a 4 to 8-hour final evaluation. The evaluator shall complete the CHP 157D, Final Evaluation – Service Desk. Prior issuing the evaluation to the trainee, the evaluator shall provide the trainee with the results of their performance.

e. If the trainee shows deficiencies in one or more critical tasks (Rating 2 or

less) they will be placed in a remedial service desk training program. The program will be set up by the training supervisor. The program will pertain to each trainee’s individual deficiency or problem.

19th Week Service Desk Training

Call Out/Stolen Vehicle Desk at least once each during the week (Side by Side with Mentor) 20th Week Service Desk Training Call-out/Stolen Vehicle Desk at least once each during the week (Side by Side with a Trainer) 21st Week Service Desk (Independent Operation) 22nd Week Service Desk (Independent Operation) Guideline #5 By the end of the 20th week:

a. The trainee must demonstrate acceptance and application of constructive criticism provided by the trainer and/or supervisor(s) throughout their Service Desk training.

b. The trainee should maintain a basic knowledge of the beat structure and geographical knowledge of the Areas.

c. The trainee should be familiar with the FSP program as it relates to the

service desk.

- 55 -

93

d. Trainee must have common abbreviations and Aural Brevity Codes must be committed to memory.

e. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to enter vehicle storages and

impounds into the Stolen Vehicle System.

Training Reminders:

a. Once a trainee begins Radio Training, the trainee should not be used to augment service desk staffing. Trainees need to be assigned to a radio four times a week during this portion of their training.

b. Each cycle of radio training consists of three cycles. Each cycle consists of fifteen days of one-on-one instruction. The first two days of Cycle 1 are limbo days. The number of training days will be tracked by the supervisor coordinating training. Each week, the trainee can be expected to have at least one limbo day which in turn will be used for introduction or re-introduction to policy and/or procedures, studying, ride-a-longs, sit-a-longs, etc. This limbo day may also be utilized for enhancement of service desk or stolen vehicle desk skills.

c. An End of Cycle Report written by the trainer is required at the end of each cycle of training. If the trainee is being rated unacceptable in any critical task, the situation and the trainee should be scrutinized very closely, keeping in mind that we have a possible candidate for remedial service desk training and/or rejection during probation. It is very important that the trainee being rated unacceptable, understands explicitly how crucial this rating is.

EMPLOYEE TRAINING GUIDELINE

Note: “Guidelines” are included primarily for the use of the trainee, the

Communications Training Officer (CTO), the Shift Supervisors, and the Training Unit. They are included in this package to ensure that the trainee is aware of what is expected of them at all times.

Module B – Radio Training includes a minimum of three (3) one-on-one 170-hour training cycles. Cycle 1 and 2 consist of 10-hour days and four (4) Limbo days to complete additional classroom/on-line training, go on Ride Alongs, and work service desk. Cycle 3 consists of 12-hour days.

- 56 -

94

Daily work assignment trades and shift trades will not be allowed until the completion of the probation period. The assignment of overtime will be is authorized in accordance with GGCC Standard Operating Procedures since the trainee has been released from service desk training.

RADIO 1st Week Initial Communications Training Academy – Module B through ** Academy: Training Reports Daily 2nd Week 3rd Week GGCC Classroom Training, Week 1 – Radio (Group Training) **Trainer: No Training Reports 4th Week Radio Training – Cycle 1, Week 1 (One-on-One with Trainer) Radios: Violet and Pink **Trainer: Training Reports due daily 5th Week Radio Training – Cycle 1, Week 2 (One-on-One with Trainer and a Limbo Day) Radios: Amber and Emerald **Trainer: Training Reports due daily 6th Week Radio Training – Cycle 1, Week 3 (One-on-One with Trainer) Radios: Maroon, Bronze, Aqua/Khaki **Trainer: Training Reports due daily 7th Week Radio Training – Cycle 1, Week 4 (One-on-One with Trainer and a Limbo Day)

Radios: Ruby, Turq/Grp (Split Violet/Turq or Maroon/Grp) **Trainer: Training Reports due daily 8th Week Radio Training – Cycle 1, Week 5 (One-on-One with Trainer, and a Limbo Day)

Radios: Turquoise/Grape, Violet, and Pink

- 57 -

95

**Trainer: Training Reports due daily Performance Log (CHP 157E) End of Cycle Report (CHP 157A) – Cycle 1

Guideline #7 By the end of the 8th week:

a. The trainee must demonstrate acceptance and application of constructive criticism from the trainer and/or supervisor(s).

b. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to add and delete field

units, as well as modify their beat priority.

c. The trainee should be familiar with each area and their beat structure, as well as demonstrate an understanding of the unit designators and unit identifier configurations.

d. The trainee should have the basic CLETS inquiry formats for driver’s

license and/or license plate checks memorized and utilize them appropriately.

e. The trainee should be able to locate information provided on a CHP

180 and determine actions necessitated to enter the vehicle into SVS.

f. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to send a contact message for the Supervised Release File.

g. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to locate and return basic

information on a driver license and/or license plate check. h. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to relay stolen vehicle

information to field personnel.

i. The trainee should be familiar with the AVTEC radio functions and how to select and/or assign primary and secondary frequencies to specific radio consoles.

j. The trainee should be familiar with which notifications need to be

made to supervisors, as well as ENTAC.

- 58 -

96

k. The trainee should understand the importance of broadcasting specific hazards for motors.

l. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to prioritize pending

incidents, as well as radio traffic from field personnel.

m. The trainee should have their telephone logged while working the radio, but at this stage of training there is no expectation he/she will be handling incoming calls.

n. The trainee should be familiar with the resource books available at

the radio positions.

o. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to Signal 10-11 and clear the frequency appropriately.

9th Week Radio Training – Cycle 2, Week 1 (One-on-One with Trainer) Radios: Amber and Emerald

**Trainer: Training Reports due daily

10th Week Radio Training – Cycle 2, Week 2 (One-on-One with Trainer and a Limbo Day) Radios: Violet, Pink, Amber, and Emerald **Trainer: Training Reports due daily Guideline #8 By the end of the 10th week:

a. The trainee should demonstrate acceptance and application of constructive criticism from the trainer and/or supervisor(s).

b. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency with the AVTEC radio

functions and how to select and/or assign primary and secondary frequencies to specific radio consoles.

c. The trainee should be familiar with patching frequencies, including

how to initiate a patch and what its primary function is.

- 59 -

97

d. The trainee should demonstrate knowledge of area beat structures, unit designators and unit identifier configurations within communications center’s jurisdiction.

e. The trainee should consistently utilize the basic CLETS inquiry

formats for driver’s license and/or license plate checks appropriately.

f. The trainee should demonstrate a working knowledge of the CLETS systems and applications used. The trainee should be aware of the responsibilities of the Stolen Vehicle Desk, as well as the reference material available.

g. The trainee should demonstrate familiarity with reading and returning

warrant information.

h. The trainee should demonstrate retention of incidents which are transpiring on their radio.

i. Toward the end of this cycle, the trainee will be introduced to

answering incoming calls on the Sergeants/Allied line when the radio is not busy.

11th Week Radio Training – Cycle 2, Week 3 (One-on-One with Trainer)

Radios: Maroon and Bronze **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 12th Week Radio Training – Cycle 2, Week 4

(One-on-One with Trainer and a Limbo Day) Radios: Ruby or Aqua/Khaki and Turquoise/Grape (Violet/Turquoise, or Maroon/Grape)

**Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 13th Week Radio Training – Cycle 2, Week 5

(One-on-One with Trainer) Radios: Ruby or Aqua/Khaki and Turquoise/Grape (Violet/Turquoise, or Maroon/Grape)

**Trainer: Training Reports are due daily Performance Log (CHP 157E) End of Cycle Report (CHP 157A) – Cycle 2

- 60 -

98

14th Week Radio Training – Cycle 3, Week 1 (One-on-One with Trainer) Radios: Master 2 and Relief 1 **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily

15th Week Radio Training – Cycle 3, Week 2 (One-on-One with Trainer)

Radio: Relief 2 and Master 1 **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily Guideline #9 By the end of the 15th week:

a. The trainee’s typing skills on the CAD system must be at a level that enables the trainee to perform multiple functions simultaneously.

b. The trainee should be familiar with the information contained within

the reference materials at each console, and a basic knowledge of how to research and interpret information.

c. The trainee should have their telephone available for incoming calls

for service and answer them when the radio is not busy. d. The trainee should maintain a working knowledge of FSP jurisdiction,

responsibilities and hours of operations. e. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency of Aural Brevity Codes,

common CAD abbreviations, common vehicle makes and models, as well as proper color codes.

f. The trainee should be able to quickly process a license plate check

and identify the transaction processing conditions (RIP, TIP or SIP), as well as be familiar with common Report of Deposit of Fees Reason codes.

g. The trainee should demonstrate familiarity with the Wanted Persons

System, Restraining Order System, Supervised Release File, Missing / Unidentified Persons System.

- 61 -

99

h. The trainee should demonstrate ability to read and return warrant information.

i. The trainee should understand the importance of answering 9-1-1

and allied agency telephone calls at the radio.

j. The trainee should be familiar with the function of Master 1 and its responsibilities.

Training Reminders:

a. An End of Cycle Report written by the trainer is required at the end of each cycle of training. If the trainee is being rated unacceptable in any critical task, the situation and the trainee should be scrutinized very closely, keeping in mind that we have a possible candidate for remedial radio training and/or rejection during probation. It is very important that the trainee being rated unacceptable, understands explicitly how crucial this rating is.

b. The trainer and shift supervisors are responsible for valid

documentation to substantiate any and all ratings. 16th Week Radio Training – Cycle 3, Week 2/3 Radios: FSP 1 and FSP 2

(One-on-One with Trainer – two days) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 17th Week Advanced Radio Training

Radio Training – Cycle 3, Week 3 Radios: Pink, Amber, Emerald or Bronze

(Independent Operation – Side by Side with Trainer) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily

18th Week Advanced Radio Training

Radio Training – Cycle 3, Week 4 Radios: Maroon, Ruby, Turquoise/Grape (Violet/Turquoise or Maroon/Grape), and Aqua/Khaki

(Independent Operation – Side by Side with Trainer) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily

- 62 -

100

19th Week Advanced Radio Training Radio Training – Cycle 3, Week 4/5

(Independent Operation – Side by Side with Trainer) Radios: Aqua and Ruby **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily 20th Week Advanced Radio Training

Radio Training – Cycle 3, Week 5 (Independent Operation – Side by Side with Trainer) Radios: Turquoise/Grape and Aqua/Khaki or Ruby

(Evaluation/Shift Supervisor – Conducts final Radio Evaluation) **Trainer: Training Reports are due daily

Performance Log (CHP 157E) End of Cycle Report (CHP 157A) – Cycle 3 Call-Taking Checklist (CHP 157R)

End of Module/Final Evaluation (CHP 157C) 21st Week Radio (Independent Operation) 22nd Week Radio (Independent Operation)

Guideline #10 By the end of the 20th week:

a. The trainee should demonstrate the ability to work unassisted on any administrative shift assignment.

b. The trainee should demonstrate proficiency in the use of the CAD

GEO Maps, CAD Latitude/Longitude function, Google maps, and as well as reference maps at each radio console.

c. The trainee should demonstrate the ability manage multiple priorities

simultaneously.

d. The trainee should make effective use of air time while providing the field units with complete information, repeating their radio traffic and documenting it appropriately.

- 63 -

101

e. The trainee demonstrates knowledge of CHP pursuit policy and use of air support.

f. The trainee should be released from training status by this time.

Once the trainee has been released, he/she shall be administratively assigned.

Training Reminders:

a. Use HPM 60.5, Communications Training Manual, Annex G, as a resource when needed.

b. If the trainee shows deficiencies in one or more critical tasks (Rating 2

or less) they will be placed in a remedial radio training program. The program will be set up by the shift supervisor. The program will pertain to each trainee’s individual deficiency or problem.

c. Module A is twenty (20) weeks of a trainee’s probationary period and

is considered Formal Service Desk Training Period. It is inclusive of three (3) weeks of Academy Training, two (2) weeks of area-specific classroom instruction at the communications center, and twelve (12) weeks of one-on-one and side by side training at the service desk. This timeframe includes two (2) days of Call Out training, two (2) days of Stolen Vehicle Desk training. At the end of this training period, the employee should be at a satisfactory (Rating 3) performance level in service desk operations. The trainee will work up to four (4) weeks of independent operation prior to moving to the next module of training.

d. Module B is twenty (20) weeks of a trainee’s probationary period and

is considered Formal Radio Training Period. It is inclusive of two (2) weeks of Academy Training, one (1) week of area-specific classroom instruction at the communications center, and eighteen (18) weeks of one-on-one and side-by-side training at the radio. At the end of this training period, the employee should be at a satisfactory (Rating 3) performance level in all critical tasks.

e. The remaining nine (9) weeks is for enhancement of the trainee’s

performance level prior to completing their probation period. During this period trainees will be administratively assigned to a shift and

- 64 -

102

regular days off. Daily work assignment trades and/or shift trades will not normally be allowed, until completion of the probationary employee has worked each radio position, Call Out and the Stolen Vehicle Desk twice.

- 65 -

103

References

Alaska Justice Forum (2008). U.S State of and Local Law Enforcement Agencies

Census 2008: A Bureau of Justice Statistics Report. Retrieved from

http://justice. uaa.alaska.edu/forum/28/2-3summerfall2011/f_lawenf_

census.html

Arias, P. & Durango Y. (2009). “Construcción De Una herramienta Para La

Identificación De Conocimientos Clave Del Proceso De I+D+I En La

Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana”, Revista Ciencias Estratégicas, 17(1), 75-88.

Bureau of Justice Statistics, Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies,

2008, NCI 233982. https://www.uaa.alaska.edu/academics/college-of-health/

departments/ justice-center/alaska-justice-forum/28/2-3summerfall2011/f_law

enf_census.cshtml

Caetano, A., B., Kavanagh, M., Lyons, Michel, J., & Velada, R. (2007), The effects of

training design, individual characteristics and work environment on transfer of

training. International Journal of Training and Development, 11, 282–294.

doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2007.00286.x

California Highway Patrol. (2014). Highway Patrol Manual 60.5, Communications

Training Program Manual. Sacramento, CA.

Carte, G.E. (1969), “Evaluation of professionalism within the criminal justice system”,

Criminology, 7(2), 39-50.

104

Carter, D.L., Sapp, A.D. & Stephens, D.W. (1989), The State of Police Education:

Policy Direction for the 21st Century, Police Executive Research Forum,

Washington, DC.

Chess, A. (1960). Civilian employees in a police department. Journal of Criminal Law,

Criminology & Police Science. 50(6), 591-595.

Chiaburu, D. S., & Lindsay, D. R. (2008). Can do or will do? The importance of self-

efficacy and instrumentality for training transfer. Human Resource Development

International, 11(2), 199-206. doi:10.1080/13678860801933004

Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA). Retrieved

August 21, 2018, from http://www.calea.org

Commission of Peace Officers Standards and Training. (2014). POST Administrative

Manual (PAM). Retrieved from http://www.post.ca.gov/post-administrative-

manual.aspx

Dalkir K. (2011), Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice, 2nd Edition, The

MIT Press.

Dunham, R. G., & Alpert, G. P. (2015). Critical issues in policing: Contemporary

readings. Waveland Press.

Endedijk, M. D. & Vermunt, J. D. (2011). Patterns in teacher learning in different

phases of the professional career. Learning and individual differences, 21(3),

294-302.

105

Etter, G. W. (1998). The role of community colleges in the training and education of

law enforcement and corrections personnel: A curriculum for the 21st century.

Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 22(5), 491-506.

Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J. C., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of

teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on

teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School

Journal, 109, 406e427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/593940

Gorozidis, G., & Papaioannou, A. G. (2014). Teachers' motivation to participate in

training and to implement innovations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39,

1-11.

Grace, L. M. (2012). Training and education for first response emergency personnel:

An examination of physical fitness requirements for the state of California and

the federal government. Journal of Homeland Security Education, 1(2), 29-41.

Retrieved from http://proxy.lib.csus.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-

com.proxy.lib.csus.edu/docview/ 1296805771?accountid=10358

Gustafson, B. G. & McClellan, S. E. (2012). Communicating law enforcement

professionalization: Social construction of standards. Policing, 35(1), 104-123.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639511211215478

Howes, R. (2009, July). The Definition of Insanity is… Perseverance vs. Perseveration.

Retrieved from https//www.psychologytoday.com

106

Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional

learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149e170. http://

dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00101-4

Lee, N. (2013). The road to progress. Law Enforcement Technology, 40(4), 28-31.

Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1353350499?

accountid=10358

Lohman, M. C. (2006). Factors influencing teachers’ engagement in informal learning

activities. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(141), 156.

doi:10.1108/13665620610654577

Merriam-Webster (2018), Webster Dictionary, retrieved on December 14, 2018, from

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/definition.

Nonaka, I y Takeuchi H (1999), “Organización creadora del conocimiento”, México:

Oxford University Press.

Reiss Jr, A. J. (1992). Police organization in the twentieth century. Crime and Justice,

51-97.

Rojek, J., Kaminski, R.J., Smith, M.R. & Scheer, C. (2007), South Carolina Law

Enforcement Training Survey: A National and State Analysis, University of South

Carolina, Columbia, SC.

Runhaar, P. R. (2008). Promoting teachers’ professional development. Enschede:

University of Twente. doi: org/10.3990/1.978903652754

107

Schneider, J. (2009), In pursuit of police professionalism: the development and

assessment of a conceptual model of professionalism in law enforcement

(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburg.

Sheehan, K. M. (1995). Reflections on dispatching: Improving dispatcher training. FBI

Law Enforcement Bulletin, 64(6), 17.

Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting

perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257-271.

Stimson, N. (Ed.) (2002). How to Write & Prepare Training Materials 2nd ed.

Sterlings, VA: Stylus Publishing Inc.

Travis, J. (1995), “Education in law enforcement: beyond the college degree”, CJ the

Americas, 8(3), 6-10.

Turner, K. D. (2015). Effects of Stress on 9-1-1 Call-Takers and Police Dispatchers:

A Study at the San Jose Police Department (Master’s Theses 4562). Available

from Scholarworks SJSU Theses database.

Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and

teaching. Learning and instruction, 9(3), 257-280.

Wilensky, H.L. (1964), The professionalization of everyone? The American Journal of

Sociology, 70(2), 137-58.