concentrated solar thermoelectric power

20
CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013 Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power Principal Investigator: Prof. Gang Chen Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 [email protected] http://web.mit.edu/nanoengineering/ Subcontractor: Prof. Zhifeng Ren University of Houston DOE EERE CSP Program: Funding Category: Seed Concept

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power Principal Investigator: Prof. Gang Chen Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Cambridge, MA 02139 [email protected]

http://web.mit.edu/nanoengineering/

Subcontractor: Prof. Zhifeng Ren University of Houston

DOE EERE CSP Program: Funding Category: Seed Concept

Page 2: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Solar to Electricity Conversion

2

Solar Electricity: PV

http://www.treehugger.com/Solar-Thermal-Plant-photo.jpg

Solar Electricity: Thermal-Mechanical

http://www.homesolarpvpanels.com

Page 3: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Thermoelectric Devices and Effects

3

COLD SIDE

HOT SIDE

Nondimensional Figure of Merit

kTSZT

2σ=

Reverse Heat Leakage Through Heat Conduction

Joule Heating

Seebeck Coefficient Electron Cooling

-

I

+

N P

COLD SIDE

HOT SIDE

Page 4: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Solar Thermoelectric Energy Conversion

4

• US Patent No. 389124: E. Weston in 1888 • M. Telkes, JAP, 765, 1954

Efficiency: 0.63%

Page 5: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Heat Flux Considerations

5

LLTkq K 100

KmW1∗

≈∆

=

q=1000 W/m2 (1 Sun); L=100 mm q=100,000 W/m2 (100 Sun); L=1 mm

Page 6: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Optical vs. Thermal Concentration

6

Optical Concentration

Optical Concentrator

p n

Selective Surface Area As

Enclosure

Solar Radiation

Page 7: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Flat Panel Solar Thermoelectric Generators (STEGs)

7

Kraemer et al., Nature Materials, May, 2011

Page 8: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Two-Stage Concentrated STEGs

8

p n

p n

Skutterudite stage

Bi2Te3 stage

Selective surface

Heat sink

I1

I2

concentrator

sunlight

Page 9: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Program Goals

• Demonstrate 10% solar-to-electric energy conversion by using optical concentration and a multi-stage TEG

• Limit required optical concentration to less than 10X, ideally less than 4X

• Demonstrate the potential for 24-hour operation by incorporating phase change materials into design

9

Page 10: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Core Team

10

Professor Gang Chen, Principal investigator

Professor Zhifeng Ren Co-Principal Investigator

Ken McEnaney Device Engineer

Daniel Kraemer System Engineer

Dr. Sveta Boriskina Optical Engineer

Dr. Weishu Liu Materials Scientist

Dr. Feng Cao Materials Scientist

Dr. Qing Jie Materials Scientist

Lee Weinstein System Engineer

Page 11: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Major Tasks and Challenges • Devices

– Electrodes – Device joining

• Emittance – Selective surfaces – Optical design

• Systems – Modeling – Integration – Testing

11

Effect of electrodes and contacts: • Parasitic losses have a linear negative effect on

system performance Effect of absorptance/emittance:

Page 12: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

TEG Optimization: Critical Parameters

12

Th

Tc

• Geometry must be optimized to • Reduce parasitic effects of electrode and

contact resistance • Reduce effect of radiative losses from

sidewalls

• For each thermoelectric leg: p-type skutterudite

p-type Bi2Te3

n-type skutterudite

n-type Bi2Te3

n hot electrode

n mid electrode

n cold electrode

p hot electrode

p mid electrode

p cold electrode

Ideal leg efficiency

Decreasing leg area

Page 13: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Electrodes: Material Properties • Bi2Te3 electrodes: <1% of system resistance • New p-type skutterudite electrode alloy:

13

Electrical resistivity reduced by a factor of 3+

Thermal conductivity increased 50% – 200%

Page 14: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Electrodes: Contact Resistance • Bi2Te3/copper contact resistance < 1 μΩ•cm2

• Skutterudite/electrode contact resistance:

14

n-type: <1 μΩ•cm2

p-type: 6 μΩ•cm2

electrode skutter.

electrode skutter.

Page 15: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

TEG Device Testing • Currently testing single-stage devices; 9% efficiency

recorded. • Multi-stage devices should boost efficiency to ~13%

15

Page 16: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Selective Surfaces • Optimized for operating temperature (500 – 600 °C) • Manufactured via sputtering • Surfaces with copper substrates not stable at high T

16

400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 11000

20

40

60

80

100

Refle

ctan

ce (%

)

Wavelength (nm)

Cu SS Cu_500_7d_in vacuum SS_500_7d_in vacuum Cu_550_7d_in vacuum SS_550_7d_in vacuum Cu_500_7d_in air

Page 17: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Emittance Testing • Direct measurement of total hemispherical emittance at

high T:

17

Sample surface

Heater

Thermocouple

Leads

Page 18: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Receiver Cavity • Receiver cavity can reduce heat loss from black surface

or selective surface

18

With blackbody absorber: With 20% selective surface:

Selective Surface Only

SS + Cavity

Black Surface + Cavity

Page 19: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Additional Leverage

• Experience: – Materials – Devices – Heat Transfer – Multiple Start-ups

• Other Programs: – EFRC S3TEC: thermoelectric materials – ARPA-E HEATS: Storage

19

Page 20: Concentrated Solar Thermoelectric Power

CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PROGRAM REVIEW 2013

Transformative Potential

• Third way: sunlight into electricity • Low cost due to:

– Solid state power block – Low optical concentration – Small amount of materials – Thermal storage

• Large market – Rooftops – Small communities – Power plants

20