conflicts

4
CONFLICTS OF LAW Preliminary Course Outline Atty. Rachelle Alma R. Panganiban I. Nature, Definition and Scope A. Definition B. Nature and Functions C. Private International Law vs. Public International Law D. Sources of Private International Law 1. Direct Sources 2. Indirect Sources II. Jurisdiction Civil Code, Articles 14, 15 and 17 Revised Penal Code, Article 2 Rules of Court, Rule 14, Section 14 A. Jurisdiction 1. Jurisdiction over the Subject Matter 2. Jurisdiction over the Res 3. Jurisdiction over the Person Case: (a) Philsec Investment et. al. vs. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 103493, 19 June 1997 (b) Asaali vs. Commissioner of Customs, L-24170, 16 December 1969 (c) U.S. vs. Look Chaw, 18 Phil 573 (d) People vs. Wong Cheng, 46 Phil 729 B. Ways of Disposing of Conflicts Cases 1. Refusal to Assume Jurisdiction: The Principle of Forum Non Conveniens Cases: (a) Bank of America NT & SA, et. al., vs. Court of Appeals, et. al., G.R. No. 120135, 31 March 2003

Upload: mtabcao

Post on 03-Nov-2014

37 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Conflicts

CONFLICTS OF LAWPreliminary Course Outline

Atty. Rachelle Alma R. Panganiban

I. Nature, Definition and Scope

A. DefinitionB. Nature and Functions C. Private International Law vs. Public International LawD. Sources of Private International Law

1. Direct Sources2. Indirect Sources

II. Jurisdiction

Civil Code, Articles 14, 15 and 17Revised Penal Code, Article 2Rules of Court, Rule 14, Section 14

A. Jurisdiction

1. Jurisdiction over the Subject Matter2. Jurisdiction over the Res3. Jurisdiction over the Person

Case:

(a) Philsec Investment et. al. vs. Court of AppealsG.R. No. 103493, 19 June 1997

(b) Asaali vs. Commissioner of Customs, L-24170, 16 December 1969

(c) U.S. vs. Look Chaw, 18 Phil 573(d) People vs. Wong Cheng, 46 Phil 729

B. Ways of Disposing of Conflicts Cases

1. Refusal to Assume Jurisdiction: The Principle of Forum Non Conveniens

Cases:

(a) Bank of America NT & SA, et. al., vs. Court of Appeals, et. al., G.R. No. 120135, 31 March 2003

(b) Manila Hotel Corporation and Manila Hotel International Ltd., vs. NLRC, G. R. No. 120077, 13 October 2000

(c) K.K. Shell Sekyu Osaka Hatsubaisho and Fu Hing Oil Co., Ltd. Vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. Nos. 90306-07, 30 July 1990

(d) Communications Materials and Design vs. Court of Appeals, G. R. No. 102223, 22 August 1996

Page 2: Conflicts

(e) Raytheon International, Inc. vs. Stockton W. Rouzie, G. R. No. 162894, 26 February 2008

2. Assuming Jurisdiction and Application of Internal or Domestic Law

a. Application of Internal Law is Decreedb. Failure to Plead and Prove Foreign Lawc. Exceptions to the Application of Foreign Law

3. Assuming Jurisdiction and Application of Foreign Law

Civil Code Articles 15, 16, 17, 815, 816, 819, 829 and 1039Rules of Court Rule 132, Section 25Rules of Court Rule 130, Section 45

Cases:

(a) United Airlines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 124110, 20 April 2001

(b) Cadalin vs. POEA Administrator, 238 SCRA 721, 774-775 (1994)

(c) Pakistan International Airlines vs. Ople, 190 SCRA 1990, G.R. No. 61594, 28 September 1990

(d) Testate Estate of Amos G. Bellis et. al. vs. Edward Belli, L-23678, 6 June 1967

(e) Spouses Zalamea vs. Court of Appeals and Transworld Airlines, Inc., G.R. No. 104235, 18 November 1993

(f) Garcia vs. Recio, G.R. No. 138322, 2 October 2001

(g) Asiavest Merchant Bankers vs. Court of Appeals, G. R. No. 110263, 20 July 2001

III. Application of Foreign Law and Various Choice of Law Theories

A. Theory of ComityB. Vested Rights TheoryC. Local Law TheoryD. Caver’s Principles of Preference (Theory of Justice) E. Harmony of Laws TheoryF. Exception to Application of Foreign Law

1. Where enforcement of foreign law is contrary to an important public policy of the forum

2. Where application of foreign law would be against good morality in the wider sense of the term as understood in the forum

3. Foreign Penal Law4. Foreign Procedural Law

Page 3: Conflicts

5. Questions Relating to Immovable Property in the Forum6. Foreign Fiscal or Administrative Law7. Where Application of Foreign Law would involve injustice or

injury to the Residents of the Forum8. Where Application of Foreign Law would endanger the foreign

relations or vital interests of the state

IV. Ascertainment and Proof of Foreign Law

A. Rules of Substance vs. Rules of Procedure

1. Forum Applies its Own Procedural Laws2. Foreign Law is Limited to Substantive Aspects

B. Proof of Foreign Law

1. Section 24, Rule 132 of the Revised Rules of Court2. Section 46, Rule 130 of the Revised Rules of Court

Cases:

(a) Asiavest Limited vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 128803, 25 September 1998

(b) Wildvalley Shipping Co., Ltd. Vs. Court of Appeals and Philippine President Lines, Inc., G.R. No. 119602, 6 October 2000

C. Effect of Failure to Plead or Prove Foreign Law

V. Nature of Conflicts Rules and the Problem of Characterization

A. Nature of Conflicts Rules

1. Parts of Conflicts Rule2. Test Factors or Points of Contacts

B. The Problem of Characterization

1. Definition2. Three Stages in Characterization3. Characterization of a Rule of Law--- “Procedural” and

“Substantive”

VI. Renvoi

A. Definition

Case:

(a) The Matter of the Testate Estate of Edward Christensen, Adolfo Aznar and Lucy Christensen vs. Helen Christensen Garcia, 7 SCRA 95 (1963)(b) Bellis vs. Bellis, 20 SCRA 358 (1967)

Page 4: Conflicts

(c) Gibbs vs. Government, 59 Phil 293

B. Four Ways of Treating the Renvoi Probelm

C. Double Renvoi

Suggested reference textbooks:

Private International Law, Jovito SalongaConflict of Laws, Edgardo L. Paras