consideration of request for cost sharing for sheyenne ... · bottineau county water resource...

1 9 8 9 I N D E X

A P a g e s

A g a s s i z W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o no f R e q u e s t f o r L o c a l C o n t r i b u t i o n P r o v i d e db y L o c a l S p o n s o r t o P h a s e I o f P r o j e c t b eA p p r o v e d a s a P o r t i o n o f t h e N o n - F e d e r a lC o s t s o f t h e O v e r a l l To t a l P r o j e c t ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f R e q u e s t 1 1 3

A p o l l o S i g n C o m p a n y - C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n dA p p r o v a l o f R e q u e s t t o P l a c e S i g n o nS t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o n P r o p e r t y 1 8 4

B

B a c k e s , R i c h a r d ;

1 ) S W C C o m m i s s i o n Te r m : 7 - 1 - 8 5 - 1 - 1 5 - 8 9

2 ) H i g h w a y C o m m i s s i o n e r A p p o i n t m e n t - 1 - 1 5 - 8 9 1

3 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l o f( R e s o l u t i o n o f A p p r e c i a t i o n 8 9 - 1 - 4 2 9 1 9 , 2 2

B a l d h i l l D a m - C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d S W CSupport of Proposed Corps of EngineersModificat ion to Dam for Safety Purposesand SWC is Agreeab le to do wha teve r i sNecessary to Seek a Non-Federal Sponsorf o r P r o j e c t i f S a t i s f a c t o r y R e s o l u t i o n o fF ina l De ta i l s o f Cos t Shar ing i sA c c o m p l i s h e d 1 3 6

B a r n e s C o u n t y W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -Consideration of Request for Cost Sharingfor Sheyenne River Snagging and ClearingP r o j e c t ;** SWC Approval of $9,440 ($5,200 from

C o n t r a c t F u n d a n d $ 4 , 2 4 0 a s Te c h n i c a lAssistance from SWC Engineering Staff)( 2 5 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) 1 4

B i n e g a r , R a n d a l 1 :

1) Resignation as MR&I Water SupplyP r o g r a m C o o r d i n a t o r , E f f e c t i v e 1 0 - 2 0 - 8 9 1 4 6

2) SWC Considerat ion and Approval ofV R e s o l u t i o n o f A p p r e c i a t i o n 8 9 - 1 2 - 4 3 5 — 1 8 2 , 1 8 6

B i o t a T r a n s f e r S t u d y ( I n t e r b a s i n B i o t aT r a n s f e r S t u d y ) :

1 ) S t u d y S t a t u s R e p o r t s

2 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l o fR e s o l u t i o n 8 9 - 3 - 4 3 1 , E n c o u r a g i n g t h e U SB u r e a u o f R e c l a m a t i o n t o P a r t i c i p a t e i nC o s t S h a r i n g i n t h e I n t e r b a s i n W a t e rT r a n s f e r S t u d i e s P r o g r a m B e i n gC o o r d i n a t e d b y t h e N o r t h D a k o t a S t a t eW a t e r C o m m i s s i o n a n d t o " P o o l " T h e i rF u n d s w i t h t h o s e o f t h e S t a t e W a t e rC o m m i s s i o n , G a r r i s o n D i v e r s i o nC o n s e r v a n c y D i s t r i c t , N o r t h D a k o t aR e s o u r c e s R e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e , a n dO t h e r P a r t i c i p a t i n g P a r t i e s

B o t t i n e a u C o u n t y W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r C o s t S h a r i n gi n R e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f B r a n d e r D r a i n N o . 7 ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 1 3 4 , 9 2 0( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s )

B u r k e C o u n t y - C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a lo f R e l e a s e o f E a s e m e n t f o r P a r c e l o f L a n dL o c a t e d i n W e s t O n e - H a l f o f S e c t i o n 2 ,Townsh ip 163 Nor th , Range 94 West

Cass County Drain No. 19, Phase I -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f r o m N o r t h C a s sWater Resource Dis t r ic t for Cost Shar ingin Channel Improvement Project;

** SWC Approval of $7,000( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) 1 0 9

C a v a l i e r C o u n t y W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -Consideration of Request for Cost Sharingof Rush Lake Restorat ion Project ;

** SWC Approval of $223,100( $ 1 7 1 , 8 5 0 f r o m C o n t r a c t F u n d a n dBa lance SWC Eng inee r i ng Se rv i ces )

( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) 6 9

C r e e l D o m e s t i c U t i l i t i e s P r o j e c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r M R & I Wa t e rSupp ly P rog ram Funds i n t he Amoun t o f$337,500, and Request for 50% Grant of

. f \ $ 5 6 , 2 5 0 f o r N o n - F e d e r a l P r o j e c t C o s t s ;V * * S W C A c t i o n D e f e r r e d 1 7 5

D

D a k o t a G a s i fi c a t i o n C o m p a n y :

1 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t t oR e s c i n d W a t e r P e r m i t C o n d i t i o n N o . 6 -

2 ) S W C M o t i o n t o R e s c i n d C o n d i t i o n -D e f e r r e d

- 1 2 7 , 1 4 4

3 ) S W C A p p r o v a l o f R e q u e s t t o R e s c i n dC o n d i t i o n

4 ) R e s o l u t i o n f r o m D a k o t a G a s i fi c a t i o nC o m p a n y B o a r d o f D i r e c t o r s P l e d g i n gt o U t i l i z e t h e W a t e r , E n e r g y a n dO t h e r R e s o u r c e s a t i t s D i s p o s a l t oH e l p E n h a n c e a n d D i v e r s i f y t h e E c o n o m yo f t h e S t a t e o f N o r t h D a k o t a a n d t oh e l p M a i n t a i n S t a b l e E l e c t r i c C o n s u m e r sb y C o n t i n u i n g a n d E x p a n d i n g D e v e l o p m e n to f t h e G r e a t P l a i n s S y n f u e l s P l a n t ,R e s o l u t i o n d a t e d O c t o b e r 1 1 , 1 9 8 9 1 4 4 , 1 6 0

5 ) L e t t e r s o f R e s p o n s e f r o m S W C t o D a k o t aR e s o u r c e s C o u n c i l a n d M e r c e r C o u n t yL a n d o w n e r s A s s o c i a t i o n R e g a r d i n gC o m m i s s i o n A c t i o n 1 8 3

D e v i l s L a k e F l o o d C o n t r o l P r o j e c t :

1 ) P r o j e c t S t a t u s R e p o r t s

2) Presentation by Corps of EngineersR e g a r d i n g R e - e v a l u a t i o n o f D r a f tF e a s i b i l i t y R e p o r t a n d E n v i r o n m e n t a lI m p a c t S t a t e m e n t

3) Devils Lake Outlet Committee Reportand Recommendat ions on Corps ofE n g i n e e r s R e - e v a l u a t i o n o f R e p o r t -■

4) Commissioner Jacob Gust Appointeda s M e m b e r o f D e v i l s L a k e O u t l e tCommi t t ee t o Rep lace R i cha rd Backes

9 2 , 1 1 6 , 1 2 3 ,1 4 1 , 1 6 5

1 1 7 , 1 2 3

5 ) Presenta t ion by Representa t i ve GordonB e r g R e l a t i v e t o P r o j e c t

6) SWC Approval to Request Corps ofE n g i n e e r s t o C o m p l e t e F l o o d C o n t r o lS t u d y a s Q u i c k l y a s P o s s i b l e ;R e q u e s t i n g t h a t S e n a t o r B u r d i c k S e e k

( a D i r e c t i v e t o t h e C o r p s o f E n g i n e e r sf o r t h e A u t h o r i t y t o C o n d u c t a S t u d yf o r t h e P u r p o s e s o f P r o v i d i n g P l a n s f o rt h e D e v e l o p m e n t , U t i l i z a t i o n , a n dC o n s e r v a t i o n o f W a t e r a n d R e l a t e d L a n dR e s o u r c e s i n t h e D e v i l s L a k e B a s i n ; a n dt h a t t h e I n i t i a l S t u d y b e a R e c o n n a i ss a n c e L e v e l S t u d y , C o m p l e t e d W i t h i nT w e l v e M o n t h s , A d d r e s s i n g W a t e r M a n a g em e n t , S t a b i l i z e d L a k e L e v e l s , W a t e rS u p p l y , W a t e r Q u a l i t y , R e c r e a t i o n , W a t e rP o l l u t i o n A b a t e m e n t , a n d E n h a n c e m e n t a n dC o n s e r v a t i o n o f F i s h a n d W i l d l i f e 1 2 3

7 ) S W C R e s p o n s e t o C o r p s o f E n g i n e e r sD e c e m b e r 1 , 1 9 8 9 L e t t e r I n d i c a t i n g i tC a n n o t b e L o c a l P r o j e c t S p o n s o r f o rD e v i l s L a k e O u t l e t F l o o d C o n t r o l S t u d ya n d A c c e p t s S u s p e n s i o n o f S t u d y U n t i lS u c h T i m e t h e F i s c a l S i t u a t i o n i n N o r t hD a k o t a I m p r o v e s a n d a L o c a l P r o j e c tS p o n s o r c a n b e I d e n t i fi e d 1 6 5

E d g e l e y Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o no f Reques t f o r MR&I Wate r Supp ly P rog ramF u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

* * SWC Approva l o f $4 ,875 MR&I Funds( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 9

Edmore Water Supply Project - Considerat iono f Reques t fo r MR&I Wate r Supp ly P rog ramF u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

* * SWC Approva l o f $3 ,750 MR&I Funds( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 1 0

E n g l e v a l e R u r a l W a t e r P r o j e c t :

1 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r M R & IWa te r Supp l y P rog ram Funds f o r Des igna n d C o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e ;

* * SWC Approva l o f $69 ,750 MR&I Funds( 7 5 % o f D e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n

C o s t s ) 3 1

2) Considerat ion of Request for 50% GrantThrough MR&I Water Supply ProgramA l l o c a t i o n o f R e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n d f o rN o n - F e d e r a l S h a r e o f P r o j e c t ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 1 3 , 1 2 5 4 1

F

F a h y , V e r n o n ;

1 ) S t a t e E n g i n e e r a n d C h i e f E n g i n e e r -S e c r e t a r y o f t h e S t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o n( M a y 1 , 1 9 7 3 - M a y 3 1 , 1 9 8 9 )

2 ) R e s i g n a t i o n a s S t a t e E n g i n e e r a n d C h i e fE n g i n e e r o f t h e S t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o n ,E f f e c t i v e M a y 3 1 , 1 9 8 9 5 3 , 7 6

3 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l o fR e s o l u t i o n o f A p p r e c i a t i o n 8 9 - 6 - 4 3 3 9 4 , 9 7

F a r g o W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o n o fRequest fo r MR&I Water Supp ly Program Fundsf o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

* * SWC Approva l o f $5 ,000 MR&I Funds( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 1 4 9

F a y, J a m e s T. - A p p o i n t e d S o u t h w e s t P i p e l i n eP r o j e c t M a n a g e r , E f f e c t i v e O c t o b e r 1 , 1 9 8 9 1 4 0

F r i n k , D a l e - S t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o n D i r e c t o ro f E n g i n e e r i n g , E f f e c t i v e A u g u s t 2 3 , 1 9 8 9 - 1 2 2

6

G a r r i s o n D i v e r s i o n P r o j e c t :

1 ) P r o j e c t S t a t u s R e p o r t s 2 , 3 0 , 6 1 ,7 9 , 1 2 9 , 1 4 5 ,

1 7 0

2 ) M id -Dako ta Reservo i r Proposa l -P r e s e n t a t i o n b y S t e p h e n H o e t z e r 2

3 ) I n t e r b a s i n W a t e r T r a n s f e r S t u d i e sP r o g r a m ( B i o t a T r a n s f e r ) :

a ) S t u d y S t a t u s R e p o r t s 2 5 , 4 5 , 8 1 ,1 4 6 , 1 7 9

b) SWC Consideration and Approvalo f R e s o l u t i o n 8 9 - 3 - 3 4 1 ,E n c o u r a g i n g t h e U S B u r e a u o fR e c l a m a t i o n t o P a r t i c i p a t e i nC o s t S h a r i n g i n t h e I n t e r b a s i nWa t e r Tr a n s f e r S t u d i e s P r o g r a mB e i n g C o o r d i n a t e d b y t h e S t a t eW a t e r C o m m i s s i o n a n d t o " P o o l "

T h e i r F u n d s w i t h t h o s e o f t h eP r o g r a m P a r t i c i p a t i n g P a r t i e s —

4 ) R e d R i v e r M u n i c i p a l Wa t e r S u p p l y S t u d y :

a ) S t u d y S t a t u s R e p o r t s

2 5 , 4 6

2 8 , 8 1 , 1 5 6 ,1 6 7

b ) C o m m i s s i o n e r W i l l i a m L a r d y ' sC o m m e n t s R e l a t i v e T o R e d R i v e rS t u d y a n d U s e O f W a t e r T oE n c o u r a g e E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t — 8 1

c ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a lt o E n t e r i n t o C o n t r a c t w i t h N o r t hD a k o t a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y t oC o n d u c t S t u d y o f E c o n o m i c a n dP o p u l a t i o n P r o j e c t i o n s f o r S t u d ya n d C o s t S h a r i n g i n 1 2 1 / 2 P e r c e n to f C o s t s w i t h M o n e y f r o m t h eG a r r i s o n M R & I N e e d s A s s e s s m e n tF u n d 8 1

C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l t oS c h e d u l e J o i n t S t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o na n d G a r r i s o n D i v e r s i o n C o n s e r v a n c yD i s t r i c t M e e t i n g 1 4

C r i t i q u e S u m m a r y o f U S B u r e a u o fR e c l a m a t i o n ' s S y k e s t o n C a n a l E v a l u a t i o na n d R i s k A n a l y s i s , D a t e d M a r c h , 1 9 8 9 — 7 4

F i s c a l Ye a r 1 9 9 0 F e d e r a l B u d g e t :

a ) R e d u c t i o n o f F u n d s f o r F Y 1 9 9 0b y 1 2 % , o r $ 3 . 6 M i l l i o n 1 7 1

R e o r g a n i z a t i o n o f U n i t e d S t a t e s -C a n a d a G a r r i s o n D i v e r s i o n T e c h n i c a lC o m m i t t e e

9 ) M u n i c i p a l , R u r a l a n d I n d u s t r i a l ( M R & I )Wate r Supp l y P rog ram:

a ) M R & I P r o g r a m S t a t u s R e p o r t s

1 4 5 , 1 7 0

7 , 3 0 , 6 1 ,7 9 , 1 1 3 , 1 2 9 ,

1 4 6 , 1 7 1

b ) M R & I P r o j e c t P r i o r i t y C o m m i t t e e :

1 ) C o m m i t t e e R e p o r t s

2 ) S W C A d o p t i o n o f C o m m i t t e eR e p o r t 1 3

c ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d S W C A p p r o v a lo f C o n s t r u c t i o n , E n g i n e e r i n g ,R i g h t - o f - W a y a n d L e g a l a s E l i g i b l eW a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t C o s t s f o rM R & I W a t e r S u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s - 3 0

d ) S W C D i s c u s s i o n R e l a t i v e t oC o n s i d e r i n g P o t e n t i a l f o rE c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t a s aP r i o r i t y F a c t o r w h e n C o n s i d e r i n gW a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t s f o r F u n d i n g 11 3

e ) S W C D i s c u s s i o n R e l a t i v e t oC o n c e p t o f C o m m u n i t i e s w i t hP o p u l a t i o n s O v e r 5 0 0 t o D e v e l o pC o n t i n g e n c y Wa t e r S u p p l y P l a n s — 11 9 ,

f ) R e s i g n a t i o n o f R a n d a l l B i n e g a r ,M R & I W a t e r S u p p l y P r o g r a mC o o r d i n a t o r , E f f e c t i v e 1 0 - 2 0 - 8 9 - 1 4 6

g ) J e f f r e y M a t t e r n N a m e d A s M R & IWa t e r S u p p l y P r o g r a m C o o r d i n a t o r,E f f e c t i v e 1 1 - 1 - 8 9 1 4 6

h) Consideration and SWC Approvalo f A p p o i n t m e n t o f G a r r i s o nD i v e r s i o n C o n s e r v a n c y D i s t r i c tC o m m i t t e e t o D e v e l o p R e c o m m e nda t i ons on Pe rcen tage o f MR&IF u n d i n g f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d i e s :

1 ) C o m m i s s i o n e r s J e r o m e S p a e t ha n d N o r m a n R u d e l A p p o i n t e d 1 4

2 ) R e p o r t a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n sf r o m C o m m i t t e e 6 5

3 ) S W C A d o p t i o n o f P o l i c yR e c o m m e n d a t i o n b y C o m m i t t e e 6 5

4 ) A p p o i n t m e n t o f C o m m i s s i o n e r sJ e r o m e S p a e t h a n d N o r m a nR u d e l t o A p p e a l s B o a r d t oH e a r S p e c i a l M R & I C a s e s f o rF u n d i n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d i e s 6 6

5 ) C o m m e n t s b y C l a r k C r o n q u i s t ,A g a s s l z R u r a l W a t e r S u p p l yP r o j e c t , R e l a t i n g t o C o s tS h a r i n g F o r m u l a o n M R & IF u n d i n g f o r P r o j e c t s 1 7 9

i ) N o r t h w e s t A r e a W a t e r S u p p l yS t u d y ( N A W S ) :

1 ) S t u d y S t a t u s R e p o r t s

2 ) C o m p l e t i o n a n d P r e s e n t a t i o no f S u m m a r y o n S u p p l e m e n t a lS t u d y t o N o r t h w e s t A r e aW a t e r S u p p l y S t u d y 5 7

3 ) S W C A u t h o r i z a t i o n f o r S t a t eE n g i n e e r a n d S t a f f t oC o n t i n u e N e g o t i a t i o n s w i t hT h r e e A f fi l i a t e d T r i b e s f o rD e v e l o p m e n t o f A l t e r n a t i v ef o r I n t e g r a t i n g t h e P r o p o s e dW a t e r I m p r o v e m e n t s f o r t h eF o r t B e r t h o l d I n d i a n R e s e rv a t i o n w i t h t h e P r o p o s e dWa t e r I m p r o v e m e n t o f N AW SS t u d y 5 8

4 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s tf o r F e d e r a l M R & I W a t e rS u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s f o rR e p o r t C o s t s o f N A W S S t u d yI n t e g r a t e d E a s t Wa t e r S u p p l yP r o g r a m ;** SWC Approval of MR&I

F u n d s o f $ 2 2 , 9 3 6 1 7 6

5 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s tf o r 2 5 % G r a n t f r o m R e s o u r c e sT r u s t F u n d i n A m o u n t o f$ 7 , 6 4 6 f o r N o n - F e d e r a lS h a r e o f S t u d y C o s t s o fN A W S S t u d y I n t e g r a t i o nE a s t W a t e r S u p p l y P r o g r a m ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f 2 5 %

G r a n t f r o m R e s o u r c e sT r u s t F u n d i n A m o u n to f $ 7 , 6 4 6 1 7 6

C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f M R & I W a t e rS u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s f o r N e e d sA s s e s s m e n t A c c o u n t ;** SWC Approval of MR&I Funds

o f $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 1 7 1

( k ) A g a s s i z R u r a l W a t e r S u p p l yP r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o n o fR e q u e s t f o r M R & I W a t e r S u p p l yP r o g r a m F u n d s f o r N o n - F e d e r a lP r o j e c t s C o s t s f o r P h a s e I ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f R e q u e s t ( N o

S p e c i fi c A m o u n t A p p r o v e d ) 1 1 3

1 ) C r e e l D o m e s t i c U t i l i t i e s P r o j e c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r M R & IW a t e r S u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s i nA m o u n t o f $ 3 3 7 , 5 0 0 , a n d R e q u e s tf o r 5 0 % G r a n t o f $ 5 6 , 2 5 0 f o r N o n -F e d e r a l C o s t s f o r D e s i g n P h a s e ;* * S W C A c t i o n D e f e r r e d 1 7 5

m ) E d g e l e y Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f

$ 4 , 8 7 5 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) — 9

n ) E d m o r e Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f

$ 3 , 7 5 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) — 1 0

{ o ) E n g l e v a l e W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tD e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e ;

** SWC Approval of MR&I Funds of$ 6 9 , 7 5 0 ( 7 5 % o f P h a s e C o s t s ) - 3 1

** SWC Approval o f 50% Grant ,i n t h e A m o u n t o f $ 1 3 , 1 2 5T h r o u g h R e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n df o r N o n - F e d e r a l S h a r e o f D e s i g na n d C o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e 4 1

p) Fargo Water Supp ly Pro jec tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;** SWC Approval of MR&I Funds of

$ 2 , 0 0 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) — 1 4 9

q) Golden Lake Resort Water SupplyP r o j e c t :

1 ) * * SWC App rova l o f MR&IF u n d s o f $ 6 , 0 0 0 f o rF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 9

2 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & IF u n d s o f $ 4 3 , 5 0 0 f o rD e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o nP h a s e ( 7 5 % o f C o s t s ) —

r ) G r a n d i n W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s

o f $ 2 , 5 0 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 1 4 7

s ) G w i n n e r W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t f o rD e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f

$ 1 8 2 , 5 0 0 ( 7 5 % o f C o s t s ) 1 1

t ) H a n k i n s o n W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t :

1 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d so f $ 6 , 0 0 0 f o r F e a s i b i l i t yS t u d y ( 7 5 % o f C o s t s ) 9

2 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d so f $ 4 5 8 , 6 2 5 f o r D e s i g n a n dC o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e ( 7 5 %o f C o s t s ) 3 4

u ) H a n n a f o r d W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f

$ 5 , 6 2 5 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) — 9

v) Harvey Water Supp ly Pro jec tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;** SWC Approval of MR&I Funds of

$ 6 , 0 7 5 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) — 9

w) Kensa l Water Supply Pro jec tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;** SWC Approval of MR&I Funds of

$ 2 , 2 5 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) — 1 5 0

x ) K i l l d e e r Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;** SWC Approval of MR&I Funds of

$ 9 , 0 0 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) — 9

y ) K ind red Wate r Supp ly P ro jec tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;** SWC Approval of MR&I Funds of

$ 2 , 0 0 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) — 1 4 8

z ) L a n g d o n R u r a l W a t e r S u p p l yP r o j e c t :

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & IF u n d s o f $ 1 8 4 , 5 0 0 f o rD e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o no f P h a s e I I ( 7 5 % o fP r o j e c t C o s t s )

2 ) D e d i c a t i o n o f P h a s e I o fP r o j e c t o n J u n e 1 3 , 1 9 8 9 — 7 9

3 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 1 , 1 5 1 , 7 8 4i n F o r m o f M R & I P r o g r a mG r a n t f o r P a r t i a l C o s t so f C o n s t r u c t i o n o f P h a s eI I 1 3 0

a a ) L e h r W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f

$ 5 , 2 5 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) — 9

b b ) M c L e a n - S h e r i d a n Wa t e r S u p p l yP r o j e c t :

1 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & IF u n d s o f $ 3 , 0 1 6 , 5 0 0 f o rP h a s e I C o n s t r u c t i o n o fP r o j e c t ( 7 5 % o f C o s t s ) - 6 3

2 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f 5 0 %G r a n t T h r o u g h t h e M R & IA l l o c a t i o n o f t h eR e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n d f o rN o n - F e d e r a l S h a r e f o rC o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t s i n a nA m o u n t n o t t o E x c e e d$ 5 0 2 , 7 5 0 6 4

3 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l f o r R e p a yment o f $165 ,000 Loan ,P l u s I n t e r e s t , T h r o u g hD e d u c t i o n o f $ 5 0 2 , 7 5 0R e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n dG r a n t P r o v i d e d f o r t h eC o n s t r u c t i o n o f P r o j e c t - 1 5 5

4 ) * * SWC App rova l o f MR&IF u n d s o f $ 7 1 0 , 2 5 0 f o rC o n s t r u c t i o n o f A l t e r n a t i v e4 , Co leharbo r Componen t ,o f P r o j e c t ( 7 5 % o fC o s t s ) 1 7 4

5 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s tf o r 5 0 % G r a n t f o r N o n -F e d e r a l S h a r e o f P r o j e c tC o s t s f o r A l t e r n a t i v e 4 ,C o l e h a r b o r C o m p o n e n t , o fP r o j e c t i n A m o u n t o f$ 1 1 8 , 3 7 5 ;

* * S W C A c t i o n D e f e r r e d — 1 7 4

c c ) M i n t o W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t :

1 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s tf o r M R & I W a t e r S u p p l yP r o g r a m F u n d s f o r F e a s ib i l i t y S t u d y ;

* * N o S W C A c t i o n T a k e n — 1 3

2 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & IF u n d s o f $ 6 6 2 , 2 5 0 f o rD e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o nP h a s e o f P r o j e c t a n dt h a t C i t y o f M i n t o b eA l l o w e d t o D e t e r m i n e t h eW a t e r S u p p l y S o u r c e

3 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f 5 0 %G r a n t t h r o u g h M R & IA l l o c a t i o n o f R e s o u r c e sT r u s t F u n d f o r N o n - F e d e r a lS h a r e o f D e s i g n a n d C o ns t r u c t i o n C o s t s f o r A l t e rn a t i v e N o . 1 , f o r G r a f t o nS u p p l y , n o t t o E x c e e d$ 9 6 , 7 5 0

4 ) C o m m e n t s f r o m M i n t o C i t yM a y o r o n P r o j e c t

dd) Missour i West Rural Water SupplyS y s t e m F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;** SWC Approval of MR&I Funds of

$ 2 3 , 6 2 5 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) -

e e ) N e w To w n Wa t e r S t o r a g e R e s e r v o i rP r o j e c t :

1 ) * * SWC App rova l o f MR&IF u n d s o f $ 7 , 5 0 0 f o rF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ( 7 5 %o f S t u d y C o s t s )

2 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & IF u n d s o f $ 1 0 8 , 0 0 0 f o rD e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o nP h a s e o f P r o j e c t

f f ) O l d S e t t l e r s P a r k W a t e r S u p p l yP r o j e c t F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f

$ 5 , 2 5 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) - 9

g g ) P a r k R i v e r W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f

$ 3 , 5 0 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) - 1 5 1

h h ) R o l l a W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f

$ 6 , 0 0 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) - 9

i i ) R u g b y W a t e r T r e a t m e n t P r o j e c t :

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & IF u n d s o f $ 1 0 , 5 0 0 f o rF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ( 7 5 %o f S t u d y C o s t s )

2 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & IF u n d s o f $ 1 8 7 , 5 0 0 f o rD e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o nP h a s e ( 7 5 % o f C o s t s ) 3 6

3 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f A d d i ti o n a l M R & I F u n d s o f$ 6 1 , 6 3 5 f o r C o n s t r u c t i o no f P h a s e I o f P r o j e c t( 7 5 % o f P r o j e c t C o s t s ) - 11 5

j j ) S o u t h w e s t P i p e l i n e P r o j e c t :

1 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d S W CA p p r o v a l o f P o l i c y t oA l l o w t h e I n t e r e s t E a r n e do n t h e S o u t h w e s t P i p e l i n eP r o j e c t M R & I A l l o c a t i o n t ob e S p e n t o n t h e P i p e l i n eP r o j e c t 6 6

2 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d S W CA p p r o v a l o f A l l o c a t i o n o fF e d e r a l F Y 1 9 8 9 Y e a r - E n dM R & I F u n d s i n A m o u n t o f

$ 2 , 0 3 3 , 0 0 0 t o b e u s e d f o rC o n s t r u c t i o n o f S o u t h w e s tP i p e l i n e P r o j e c t 1 7 2

3 ) S W C C o m m e n t s t h a t S o u t h w e s tP i p e l i n e P r o j e c t i s o f H i g hP r i o r i t y w h e n R e a l l o c a t i o no f F Y 1 9 9 0 M R & I F u n d s a r eD e t e r m i n e d 1 8 0

k k ) S t r e e t e r W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f

$ 5 , 6 2 5 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) - 9

11 ) W i s h e k W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c tF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f

$ 6 , 7 5 0 ( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) - 9

Golden Lake Resort Water Supply Project:

1 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r M R & I Wa t e rS u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t yS t u d y ;* * SWC Approva l o f $6 ,000 MR&I Funds

( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 9

2 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r M R & I Wa t e rSupp ly P rog ram Funds fo r Des ign andC o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e ;

* * SWC App rova l o f $43 ,500 MR&IF u n d s ( 7 5 % o f E l i g i b l e C o s t s ) 3 2

G o l d e n - R u s h L a k e O u t l e t C h a n n e l - C o n s i d e r a t i o no f R e q u e s t f r o m S t e e l e C o u n t y Wa t e rResource D is t r i c t fo r Cos t Shar ing ;** SWC Approval of $9,950

( $ 7 , 0 5 0 i s f r o m C o n t r a c t F u n d a n dBa lance SWC Eng inee r i ng Se rv i ces )


Grand Fo rks New R ive rs i de Pa rk Dam - Ded i ca t i ono f D a m o n J u n e 2 2 , 1 9 8 9 7 9

Grandin Water Supply Project - Considerat ion ofRequest for MR&I Water Supply Program Fundsf o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

** SWC Approval of $2,500 MR&I Funds( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 1 4 7

G r a n t s - G o v e r n o r S i n n e r ' s R e q u e s t t o D e l a yD i s p e r s i o n o f G r a n t s U s i n g S t a t e G e n e r a l o rSpec ia l Fund Money Under the Agency ' sA u t h o r i t y w h i c h a r e n o t b o u n d b y a C e r t a i nT i m e R e q u i r e m e n t i n t h e A u t h o r i z i n gL e g i s l a t i o n 1 5 3

G w i n n e r Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o n o fRequest for MR&I Water Supply Program Fundsf o r D e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e ;

* * SWC Approva l o f $182 ,500 MR&I Funds( 7 5 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) 1 1

H

H a m m e r - S u l l i v a n D r a i n N o . 1 , P h a s e I I -Cons ide ra t i on o f Reques t f r om Ramsey Coun tyW a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t f o r C o s t S h a r i n g i n4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s i n t h e A m o u n to f $120 ,566 fo r Cons t ruc t ion o f P ro jec t ;

* * S W C A c t i o n D e f e r r e d 1 8 1

H a n k i n s o n Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t :

1 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r M R & I Wa t e rS u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t yS t u d y ;* * SWC Approva l o f $6 ,000 MR&I Funds

( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 9

2) Considerat ion of Request for MR&I WaterSupp ly P rog ram Funds fo r Des ign andC o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e ;

* * SWC Approva l o f $458 ,625 MR&IF u n d s ( 7 5 % o f E l i g i b l e C o s t s ) 3 4

H a n n a f o r d Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o no f MR&I Water Supp ly Program Funds fo rF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * SWC Approva l o f $5 ,625 MR&I Funds

( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 9

H a r v e y Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o nof Request for MR&I Water Supply ProgramF u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

* * SWC Approva l o f $6 ,075 MR&I Funds( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 9

H e i m d a l D r a i n - C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f r o mN e l s o n C o u n t y W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t f o rA d d i t i o n a l C o s t S h a r i n g a n d R e a p p r o p r i a t i o no f A p p r o v e d C a r r y - O v e r F u n d i n g f o r P r o j e c t ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 5 8 , 8 1 5( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) 8 5

I

I n t e r b a s i n Wa t e r T r a n s f e r S t u d i e s P r o g r a m( B i o t a T r a n s f e r ) :

1 ) S t u d y S t a t u s R e p o r t s 2 5 , 4 5 , 8 1 ,1 4 6 , 1 7 9

2 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l o fR e s o l u t i o n 8 9 - 3 - 3 4 1 , E n c o u r a g i n g t h eU S B u r e a u o f R e c l a m a t i o n t o P a r t i c i p a t ei n C o s t S h a r i n g i n t h e I n t e r b a s i n W a t e rTr a n s f e r S t u d i e s P r o g r a m B e i n g C o o rd i n a t e d b y S t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o n a n dt o " P o o l " T h e i r F u n d s W i t h T h o s e o f t h eP r o g r a m P a r t i c i p a t i n g P a r t i e s 2 5 , 4 6

J

J o n e s , K e n t :

1 ) Te r m a s E x - O f fi c i o M e m b e r o f S W C :E l e c t e d : J a n . 1 , 1 9 8 1 - D e c . 3 1 , 1 9 8 4R e e l e c t e d : J a n . 1 , 1 9 8 5 - D e c . 3 1 , 1 9 8 8D e f e a t e d b y S a r a h Vo g e l i n 1 9 8 8 E l e c t i o n

2) Considerat ion and SWC Approval ofR e s o l u t i o n o f A p p r e c i a t i o n 8 9 - 1 - 4 3 0 1 9 , 2 1

K e n s a l Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o nof Request for MR&I Water Supply ProgramF u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

** SWC Approval of $2,250 MR&I Funds(75% o f S tudy Cos ts )

K i l l deer Wate r Supp ly P ro jec t - Cons ide ra t ionof Request for MR&I Water Supply ProgramF u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

* * SWC Approva l o f $9 ,000 MR&I Funds(75% o f S tudy Cos ts )

K i n d r e d W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o no f MR&I Wate r Supp ly P rog ram Funds fo rF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * SWC App rova l o f $2 ,000 MR&I Funds

( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s )

L a k e H o s k i n s P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o n o fR e q u e s t f r o m M c i n t o s h C o u n t y W a t e rR e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t f o r C o s t S h a r i n g ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 1 4 , 2 5 6( $ 1 0 , 8 0 0 f r o m C o n t r a c t F u n d a n dB a l a n c e S W C E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s )

( 3 3 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) —

D a k o t a D r a i n ( N e l s o n C o u n t y L e g a l D r a i n # 4 ) -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r A d d i t i o n a l$ 6 , 3 4 4 f o r P r o j e c t ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 6 , 3 4 4 , n o t t o E x c e e dT o t a l P r o j e c t C o s t o f $ 1 9 , 2 7 4( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s )

Lake Sakakawea - Lake Oahe Surplus Land Proposalf o r C o r p s o f E n g i n e e r s t o R e t u r n L a n d s t oI n d i a n T r i b e s :

1 ) P r o p o s a l D i s c u s s i o n 9 3

2 ) S W C D e c i s i o n t o M e e t w i t h S O R I C t oDiscuss and Provide Comments to Proposal 94

Langdon Rural Water Supply Project:

1) Considerat ion of Request for MR&I WaterS u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s f o r P h a s e I I ;* * SWC App rova l o f $184 ,500 MR&I Funds -62

2 ) D e d i c a t i o n f o r P h a s e I - J u n e 1 3 , 1 9 8 9 7 9

3) Considerat ion of Request for MR&I WaterS u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s f o r P a r t I o fC o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e o f P h a s e I I ;* * SWC Approva l o f $1 ,151 ,784 MR&I 130

Lehr Water Supply Pro ject - Considerat ion ofRequest for MR&I Water Supply ProgramF u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

** SWC Approval of $5,250 MR&I Funds( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 9

M

M a t t e r n , J e f f r e y - N a m e d a s M R & I Wa t e r S u p p l yP r o g r a m C o o r d i n a t o r , E f f e c t i v e 1 1 - 1 - 8 9 1 4 6

M c i n t o s h C o u n t y W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r C o s t S h a r i n gi n L a k e H o s k i n s P r o j e c t ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 1 4 , 2 5 6( $ 1 0 , 8 0 0 f r o m C o n t r a c t F u n d a n dB a l a n c e S W C E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s )


M c L e a n - S h e r i d a n Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t ;

1 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f$ 3 , 0 1 6 , 5 0 0 f o r P h a s e I C o n s t r u c t i o no f P r o j e c t ( 7 5 % o f C o s t s ) 6 3

2) ** SWC Approval of 50% Grant Throught h e M R & I A l l o c a t i o n o f t h e R e s o u r c e sT r u s t F u n d f o r N o n - F e d e r a l S h a r e f o rC o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t s i n a n A m o u n t n o tt o E x c e e d $ 5 0 2 , 7 5 0 6 4

3 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l f o r R e p a y m e n t o f$ 1 6 5 , 0 0 0 L o a n , P l u s I n t e r e s t ,T h r o u g h D e d u c t i o n o f $ 5 0 2 , 7 5 0R e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n d G r a n t P r o v i d e df o r t h e C o n s t r u c t i o n o f P r o j e c t 1 5 5

4 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f$ 7 1 0 , 2 5 0 f o r C o n s t r u c t i o n o fA l t e r n a t i v e 4 , C o l e h a r b o r C o m p o n e n t ,o f P r o j e c t ( 7 5 % o f C o s t s ) 1 7 4

5) Considerat ion of Request for 50% Grantf o r N o n - F e d e r a l S h a r e o f P r o j e c t C o s t sf o r A l t e r n a t i v e 4 , C o l e h a r b o r C o m p o n e n t ,o f P r o j e c t i n A m o u n t o f $ 1 1 8 , 3 7 5 ;


J a n u a r y 2 6 , 1 9 8 9M a r c h 9 , 1 9 8 9A p r i l 2 0 , 1 9 8 9 ( Te l e p h o n e C o n f e r e n c e C a l l )M a y 1 0 , 1 9 8 9J u n e 7 , 1 9 8 9J u n e 1 5 , 1 9 8 9 ( Te l e p h o n e C o n f e r e n c e C a l l )

J u l y 7 , 1 9 8 9A u g u s t 2 4 , 1 9 8 9O c t o b e r 2 0 , 1 9 8 9D e c e m b e r 6 , 1 9 8 9

D e v i l s L a k e , N DB i s m a r c k , N DW e s t F a r g o , N DG r a n d F o r k s , N D

M i d - D a k o t a R e s e r v o i r ( G a r r i s o n D i v e r s i o nP r o j e c t ) - P r e s e n t a t i o n b y S t e p h e nH o e t z e r R e l a t i v e t o P r o j e c t 2

M i n t o W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t :

1 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r M R & IWa t e r S u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s f o rF e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

* * N o S W C A c t i o n T a k e n 1 3

2 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f$ 6 6 2 , 2 5 0 f o r D e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o nP h a s e o f P r o j e c t a n d t h a t C i t y o fM i n t o b e A l l o w e d t o D e t e r m i n e t h eW a t e r S u p p l y S o u r c e 3 8

r \

3) ** SWC Approval of 50% Grant ThroughM R & I A l l o c a t i o n o f R e s o u r c e sT r u s t F u n d f o r N o n - F e d e r a l S h a r eo f D e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t sf o r A l t e r n a t i v e N o . 1 , f o r G r a f t o nS u p p l y , n o t t o E x c e e d $ 9 6 , 7 5 0 8 0

4) Comments from Minto City Mayor onP r o j e c t 1 7 9

M i n u t e s o f M e e t i n g s :

December 7, 1988 Considered and Approved - 1

January 26, 1989 Considered and Approved - 2 3

M a r c h 9 , 1 9 8 9 C o n s i d e r e d a n d A p p r o v e d - 5 0

Apr i l 20, 1989 (Telephone Conference Cal l )C o n s i d e r e d a n d A p p r o v e d - 5 1

M a y 1 0 , 1 9 8 9 C o n s i d e r e d a n d A p p r o v e d - 7 8

J u n e 7 , 1 9 8 9 C o n s i d e r e d a n d A p p r o v e d - 1 0 3

June 15, 1989 (Telephone Conference Call)Cons ide red and App roved - 1 0 3

J u l y 7 , 1 9 8 9 C o n s i d e r e d a n d A p p r o v e d - 1 2 1

A u g u s t 2 4 , 1 9 8 9 C o n s i d e r e d a n d A p p r o v e d - 1 3 9

O c t o b e r 2 0 , 1 9 8 9 C o n s i d e r e d a n d A p p r o v e d - 1 6 2

M i s s o u r i R i v e r :

1 ) S t a t u s R e p o r t s

2 ) U S A r m y C o r p s o f E n g i n e e r s R e v i e w o fM a s t e r M a n u a l f o r R i v e r O p e r a t i o n s 1 4 3

3 ) S t a t e E n g i n e e r A p p o i n t e d a s N o r t hD a k o t a R e p r e s e n t a t i v e t o M i s s o u r i R i v e rB a s i n G o v e r n o r s ' O v e r s i g h t C o m m i t t e e — 1 7 0

4 ) F o r m a t i o n o f M a s t e r M a n u a l R e v i e wC o m m i t t e e C o n s i d e r i n g M i s s o u r i R i v e rW a t e r U s e s 1 7 0

Missouri West Rural Water Supply System -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r M R & I Wa t e rS u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t yS t u d y ;* * SWC Approva l o f $23 ,625 MR&I Funds

(75% o f S tudy Cos ts )

M u n i c i p a l , R u r a l a n d I n d u s t r i a l ( M R & I ) W a t e rS u p p l y P r o g r a m

(See No. 9 under Garrison Diversion Project)

Nelson County Legal Drain No. 4 (Dakota Drain) -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r A d d i t i o n a l$ 6 , 3 4 4 f o r P r o j e c t ;** SWC Approval of $6,344, not to

E x c e e d To t a l C o s t o f $ 1 9 , 2 7 4( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) 8 2

N e l s o n , D e n n i s :

1) Water Educat ion for Teachers Program(WET) - Resignation as ProgramC o o r d i n a t o r ; E f f e c t i v e 1 1 - 1 5 - 8 9 1 5 8

2) Resolution of Appreciation 89-12-436 — 183, 187

N e w To w n W a t e r S t o r a g e R e s e r v o i r P r o j e c t :

1 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f$ 7 , 5 0 0 f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 9

2 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f$ 1 0 8 , 0 0 0 f o r D e s i g n a n dC o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e o f P r o j e c t 3 5

N o r t h C a s s W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r A d d i t i o n a lC o s t S h a r i n g a n d C a r r y o v e r F u n d i n g f o rR C & D C r i t i c a l A r e a T r e a t m e n t S i t e # 3 1 C ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f A d d i t i o n a l $ 1 , 0 9 1( To t a l E l i g i b l e C o s t s o f P r o j e c t n o t

t o E x c e e d $ 8 , 2 3 5 )( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) 8 4

N o r t h C a s s W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r C o s tSharing in Channel Improvement Projectf o r C a s s C o u n t y D r a i n N o . 1 9 , P h a s e I ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 7 , 0 0 0( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) 1 0 9

Nor thwes t A rea Wate r Supp ly S tudy (NAWS) :

1 ) S t u d y S t a t u s R e p o r t s 1 7 , 1 7 6

2 ) C o m p l e t i o n a n d P r e s e n t a t i o n o fSummary on Supp lementa l S tudy toN o r t h w e s t A r e a W a t e r S u p p l y 5 7

3) SWC Author iza t ion fo r S ta te Eng ineera n d S t a f f t o C o n t i n u e N e g o t i a t i o n s w i t hT h r e e A f fi l i a t e d T r i b e s f o rD e v e l o p m e n t o f A l t e r n a t i v e f o rI n t e g r a t i n g t h e P r o p o s e d Wa t e rI m p r o v e m e n t s f o r t h e F o r t B e r t h o l dIndian Reservat ion wi th the ProposedW a t e r I m p r o v e m e n t o f N A W S S t u d y 5 8

4 ) Cons ide ra t i on o f Reques t fo r Federa lMR&I Water Supp ly Program Funds fo rReport Costs of NAWS Study IntegratedEas t Wate r Supp ly P rog ram;

* * SWC Approva l o f MR&I Fundso f $ 2 2 , 9 3 6 1 7 6

5) Considerat ion of Request for 25%G r a n t f r o m R e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n d i nA m o u n t o f $ 7 , 6 4 6 f o r N o n - F e d e r a l

S h a r e o f S t u d y C o s t s o f N A W S S t u d yI n t e g r a t i o n E a s t Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o g r a m ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f 2 5 % G r a n t

f r o m R e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n di n A m o u n t o f $ 7 , 6 4 6

O l d S e t t l e r s P a r k W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r M R & l W a t e rS u p p l y P r o g r a m F u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * SWC Approva l o f $5 ,250 MR&l Funds

( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s )

P

P a r k R i v e r Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o nof Request for MR&l Water Supply ProgramF u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

** SWC Approval of $3,500 MR&l Funds( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s ) 1 5 1

R

R a m s e y C o u n t y Wa t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r C o s tShar ing in 40% of E l ig ib le Pro jec tC o s t s i n t h e A m o u n t o f $ 1 2 0 , 5 6 6 f o rC o n s t r u c t i o n o f P r o j e c t ;


R e d R i v e r D i k e s :

1 ) P r o j e c t S t a t u s R e p o r t s 7 3 , 1 1 2 , 1 2 5 ,1 4 2 , 1 6 8

2) SWC Considerat ion and Approval toSe t As ide $6 ,500 to Pay ExpensesN e c e s s a r y t o B r i n g Wo s i c k D i k einto Compl iance with Correct ive Plan — 125, 142

3) SWC Considerat ion and Approval forA d d i t i o n a l $ 2 , 1 3 0 f o r W o s i c k D i k eR e m o v a l 1 6 8

R e d R i v e r M u n i c i p a l Wa t e r S u p p l y S t u d y :

1 ) P r o j e c t S t a t u s R e p o r t s 2 8 , 8 1 , 1 5 6 , 1 6 7

2 ) C o n u n i s s i o n e r W i l l i a m L a r d y * s C o m m e n t sR e l a t i v e t o R e d R i v e r S t u d y a n d U s eo f Wate r to Encourage EconomicD e v e l o p m e n t 8 1

3 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l t oE n t e r i n t o C o n t r a c t w i t h N o r t h D a k o t aS t a t e U n i v e r s i t y t o C o n d u c t S t u d yo f E c o n o m i c a n d P o p u l a t i o nP r o j e c t i o n s f o r S t u d y a n d C o s t S h a r i n gi n 1 2 1 / 2 P e r c e n t o f C o s t s w i t h M o n e yf r o m t h e G a r r i s o n M R & I N e e d s A s s e s sm e n t F u n d 8 1

R e i l e ' s A c r e s , C i t y o f . F l o o d C o n t r o l S t u d y -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f r o m S o u t h e a s tC a s s W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t f o r C o s tS h a r i n g i n S t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 1 0 , 0 0 0

( 5 0 % o f E l i g i b l e S t u d y C o s t s ) 1 1 0

R e s o l u t i o n s :

8 9 - 1 - 4 2 9 K e n t J o n e s , I n A p p r e c i a t i o n 1 9 , 2 1

8 9 - 1 - 4 3 0 R i c h a r d B a c k e s , I n A p p r e c i a t i o n 1 9 , 2 2

8 9 - 3 - 4 3 1 E n c o u r a g e s U n i t e d S t a t e s B u r e a uo f R e c l a m a t i o n t o P a r t i c i p a t ei n C o s t S h a r i n g i n t h e I n t e r -b a s i n W a t e r T r a n s f e r S t u d i e sP r o g r a m B e i n g C o o r d i n a t e d b yt h e N o r t h D a k o t a S t a t e W a t e rC o m m i s s i o n a n d t o " P o o l " T h e i rF u n d s w i t h T h o s e o f t h e S t a t eW a t e r C o m m i s s i o n , G a r r i s o nD i v e r s i o n C o n s e r v a n c y D i s t r i c t ,N o r t h D a k o t a W a t e r R e s o u r c e sR e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e , a n d O t h e rP a r t i c i p a t i n g P a r t i e s 2 5 , 4 6

8 9 - 5 - 4 3 2 I n S u p p o r t o f R a f f e r t y a n dA l a m e d a D a m s i n C a n a d a 6 1 , 7 7

8 9 - 6 - 4 3 3 Ve r n o n F a h y, I n A p p r e c i a t i o n — 9 4 , 9 7

8 9 - 1 0 - 4 3 4 R o s e l l e n S a n d , I n A p p r e c i a t i o n 1 5 8 , 1 6 1

8 9 - 1 2 - 4 3 5 R a n d a l l B i n e g a r , I n A p p r e c i a t i o n 1 8 2 , 1 8 6

8 9 - 1 2 - 4 3 6 D e n n i s N e l s o n , I n A p p r e c i a t i o n 1 8 3 , 1 8 7

R e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n d - R e a l l o c a t i o n o f F u n d s — 5 4 , 9 0 , 1 5 3

R i c h l a n d C o u n t y W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r C o s t S h a r i n gi n S h e y e n n e R i v e r S n a g g i n g a n d C l e a r i n gP r o j e c t ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 3 2 , 5 0 0 ( $ 3 0 , 0 0 0

f r o m C o n t r a c t F u n d a n d $ 2 , 5 0 0 a sT e c h n i c a l A s s i s t a n c e f r o m S W C

E n g i n e e r i n g S t a f f )( 2 5 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) 1 6

R i c h l a n d C o u n t y D r a i n N o . 3 2 B C h a n n e lI m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o n o fR e q u e s t f r o m R i c h l a n d C o u n t y W a t e rR e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t f o r C o s t S h a r i n gi n P r o j e c t ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 11 , 6 7 0( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) •

R o l l a W a t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o no f Reques t f o r MR&I Wa te r Supp l yP r o g r a m F u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;* * SWC Approva l o f $6 ,000 MR&I Funds

(75% o f S tudy Cos ts )

R u g b y Wa t e r Tr e a t m e n t P r o j e c t :

1 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f$ 1 0 , 5 0 0 f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y( 7 5 % o f S t u d y C o s t s )

S W C A p p r o v a l o f M R & I F u n d s o f$ 1 8 7 , 5 0 0 f o r D e s i g n a n dC o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e( 7 5 % o f C o s t s )

3 ) * * S W C A p p r o v a l o f A d d i t i o n a l M R & IF u n d s o f $ 6 1 , 6 3 5 f o r C o n s t r u c t i o no f P h a s e I o f P r o j e c t( 7 5 % o f P r o j e c t C o s t s )

Rush Lake Restorat ion Pro ject - Considerat ionof Request from Cavalier County WaterResource D is t r i c t fo r Cos t Shar ing ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 2 2 3 , 1 0 0( $ 1 7 1 , 8 5 0 f r o m C o n t r a c t F u n d a n d

B a l a n c e S W C E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s )( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s )

. / s

S a n d , R o s e l l e n M . - C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n dA p p r o v a l o f R e s o l u t i o n o f A p p r e c i a t i o nN o . 8 9 - 1 0 - 4 3 4 1 5 8 , 1 6 1

S h e y e n n e - M a p l e R i v e r F l o o d C o n t r o l P r o j e c t :

1 ) C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r F u n d i n gA s s i s t a n c e i n t h e A m o u n t o f $ 9 0 0 , 0 0 0f o r N o n - F e d e r a l C o s t s f o r t h e H o r a c e -W e s t F a r g o D i v e r s i o n ;

* * S W C A c t i o n D e f e r r e d 1 5 4 , 1 8 0

2 ) S W C To u r o f P r o j e c t , O c t o b e r 2 0 , 1 9 8 9 - 1 5 9

S h e y e n n e R i v e r S n a g g i n g a n d C l e a r i n gP r o j e c t i n B a r n e s C o u n t y - C o n s i d e r a t i o no f R e q u e s t f r o m B a r n e s C o u n t y W a t e rR e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t f o r C o s t S h a r i n g ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 9 , 4 4 0( $ 5 , 2 0 0 f r o m C o n t r a c t F u n d a n d

$ 4 , 2 4 0 i n T e c h n i c a l A s s i s t a n c ef r o m S W C E n g i n e e r i n g S t a f f )


Sheyenne R i ve r Snagg ing and C lea r i ngP r o j e c t i n R i c h l a n d C o u n t y - C o n s i d e r a t i o no f R e q u e s t f r o m R i c h l a n d C o u n t y W a t e rR e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t f o r C o s t S h a r i n g ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 3 2 , 5 0 0( $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 f r o m C o n t r a c t F u n d a n d

$ 2 , 5 0 0 i n T e c h n i c a l A s s i s t a n c ef r o m S W C E n g i n e e r i n g S t a f f )

( 2 5 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s )

Sheyenne R i ve r Snagg ing and C lea r i ngP r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s tf r o m S o u t h e a s t C a s s W a t e r R e s o u r c eD i s t r i c t f o r A d d i t i o n a l C o s t S h a r i n gi n P r o j e c t ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f a n A d d i t i o n a l$ 1 2 , 4 7 8 , n o t t o E x c e e d T o t a lP r o j e c t C o s t s o f $ 3 6 , 2 2 8( 2 5 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s )

S o u r i s R i v e r F l o o d C o n t r o l P r o j e c t :

1 ) P r o j e c t S t a t u s R e p o r t s 1 9 , 5 9 , 9 5 ,1 1 9 , 1 2 2 , 1 4 1 ,1 6 4

2 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l t oR e l e a s e $ 8 5 2 , 6 9 2 f r o m t h e C a r r y o v e rA p p r o p r i a t i o n F u n d s t o R e v e r t t o t h eR e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n d ; a n d , i n t u r n .A l l o c a t e $ 8 5 2 , 6 9 2 f r o m t h e C u r r e n tA p p r o p r i a t i o n t o t h e S W C f r o m t h eR e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n d 5 9

3 ) P r e s e n t a t i o n b y C i t y o f M i n o t R e p si n S u p p o r t o f R a f f e r t y a n d A l a m e d aD a m s P r o j e c t 6 0

4 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l o fR e s o l u t i o n N o . 8 9 - 5 - 4 3 2 , I n S u p p o r to f R a f f e r t y a n d A l a m e d a D a m s P r o j e c t — 6 1 , 7 7

5 ) D i s t r i b u t i o n o f D r a f t o f I n i t i a lE v a l u a t i o n o f R a f f e r t y a n d A l a m e d aD a m s P r o j e c t 9 5

S o u t h e a s t C a s s W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r A d d i t i o n a lFunding for Sheyenne River Snagging andC l e a r i n g P r o j e c t ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f A d d i t i o n a l $ 1 2 , 4 7 8

( N o t t o E x c e e d $ 3 6 , 2 2 8 To t a l P r o j e c tC o s t s )( 2 5 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) 8 3

S o u t h e a s t C a s s W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -Considerat ion of Request for Cost Sharingi n C i t y o f R e i l e ' s A c r e s F l o o d C o n t r o lS t u d y ;* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 1 0 , 0 0 0

( 5 0 % o f E l i g i b l e S t u d y C o s t s ) 1 1 0

S o u t h w e s t P i p e l i n e P r o j e c t :

1 ) P r o j e c t S t a t u s R e p o r t s 1 7 , 2 4 , 4 7 , 5 1 ,8 7 , 1 0 3 , 1 2 2 ,

1 4 0 , 1 6 3

2 ) S W C A p p r o v a l o f A w a r d o f C o n t r a c t5 - 2 f o r D i c k i n s o n R e s e r v o i r t oG e o r g e E . H a g g a r t , I n c . o f F a r g o 1 8

3 ) D i s c u s s i o n R e l a t i v e t o P a r a l l e lP i p e l i n e s 1 8

4 ) S W C A p p r o v a l o f A w a r d o f C o n t r a c t 2 - 1f o r R a w Wa t e r P i p e l i n e t o B a r n a r dC o n s t r u c t i o n C o m p a n y, I n c . o fB o z e m a n , M T 2 4

S W C A p p r o v a l o f A w a r d o f C o n t r a c t1 - 1 / 3 - l A f o r I n t a k e P u m p S t a t i o na n d R a w W a t e r R e s e r v o i r t o I n d u s t r i a lB u i l d e r s , I n c . o f B i s m a r c k

P r e s e n t a t i o n b y W e s t R i v e r J o i n t B o a r do f i t s S t u d y o f I n t e g r a t i o n o f R u r a lD i s t r i b u t i o n S y s t e m s w i t h S W P P :

a ) S t a t u s R e p o r t s a n d D i s c u s s i o n

P r e s e n t a t i o n b y B r u c e M c C o l l o m ,P r o j e c t M a n a g e r f o r B a r t l e t t a n dW e s t / B o y l e E n g i n e e r i n g , o f F i n a lR e p o r t o f I n t e g r a t i o n S t u d y

S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l t oD i r e c t S t a t e E n g i n e e r a n d S t a f ft o D e s i g n F u t u r e C o n s t r u c t i o n o fS W P P P r o j e c t w i t h I n t e g r a t i o no f R u r a l W a t e r a s a C r i t e r i a 1 0 4

d ) S t a t e m e n t s b y A l f r e d U n d e r d a h l ,C h a i r m a n o f W e s t R i v e r J o i n tW a t e r R e s o u r c e B o a r d 1 0 5 , 1 2 0

7 ) A r c h e o l o g i c a l S t u d i e s :

a ) S t a t u s R e p o r t s 4 7 , 9 0

b ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a lo f A w a r d o f C o n t r a c t f o r C u l t u r a lR e s o u r c e M i t i g a t i o n R e q u i r e m e n t sf o r S i t e s 3 2 M E 7 9 7 , 3 2 M E 8 4 7 a n d3 2 M E 7 9 9 - K t o L a r s o n - T i b e s a rA s s o c i a t e s , L a r a m i e , W y 4 7

8 ) R e a l l o c a t i o n o f R e s o u r c e s T r u s tF u n d A l l o c a t i o n f o r P r o j e c t 5 4 , 1 1 8

9 ) F e d e r a l P o w e r D i s t r i b u t i o n :

a ) S t a t u s R e p o r t s 5 5 , 8 9

10) SWC Consideration and Approval of$ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 f r o m R e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n dt o P r o v i d e E l e c t r i c a l S e r v i c eF a c i l i t i e s i n t h e I n t a k e P u m p S t a t i o n

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 f r o mR e s o u r c e s T r u s t F u n d 5 5

11 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l o fA d d i t i o n a l C o s t s o f $ 1 , 1 5 0 ( 5 0 % )f o r I n t e g r a t i o n S t u d y o f R u r a lW a t e r S y s t e m s

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 1 , 1 5 0

1 2 ) D i s c u s s i o n R e g a r d i n g J o h n s o nC o n s t r u c t i o n B a n k r u p t c y a n d C o m p l e t i o no f C o n t r a c t s 2 - 3 A a n d 2 - 3 B :

a ) S t a t u s R e p o r t s 5 2 , 8 7 , 1 0 3

b ) S W C A p p r o v a l t o A u t h o r i z e S t a t eE n g i n e e r t o N e g o t i a t e w i t h S t .P a u l F i r e a n d M a r i n e I n s u r a n c eC o m p a n y t o R e a c h A g r e e m e n tw h i c h b o t h P r o t e c t s t h e S t a t eW a t e r C o m m i s s i o n I n t e r e s t s a n dA s s u r e s C o m p l e t i o n o f t h e S W P PC o n t r a c t s 2 - 3 A a n d 2 - 3 B ; a n dt h a t p r i o r t o t h e A c c e p t a n c e o fa n y N e g o t i a t e d A g r e e m e n t , t h eS t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o n S h a l l M e e tb y T e l e p h o n e C o n f e r e n c e C a l l , o ra t a n U p c o m i n g M e e t i n g , t o C o n s i d e rt h e N e g o t i a t e d A g r e e m e n t 8 7

1 3 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l o fP o l i c y t o A l l o w t h e I n t e r e s t E a r n e do n t h e S W P P M R & I A l l o c a t i o n t o b eS p e n t o n t h e P i p e l i n e P r o j e c t 6 6

1 4 ) F u t u r e F i n a n c i n g o f P r o j e c t :

a ) S W C D i s c u s s i o n s 9 0 , 9 8 , 1 6 3

b ) S t a f f t o P r e p a r e D r a f t o fA l t e r n a t i v e s

c ) SWC Au tho r i za t i on f o r Ac t i ngS t a t e E n g i n e e r t o E n t e r i n t oC o n t r a c t w i t h B a r n a r d C o n s t r u ct i o n , I n c . f o r t h e C o m p l e t i o n o fW o r k o n S W P P C o n t r a c t s 2 - 3 A a n d

1 5 ) D i s c u s s i o n R e l a t i v e t o W a t e r T r e a t m e n ta n d P h a s e d C o n s t r u c t i o n S c h e d u l e 1 0 4

16) Tim Fay, Appointed Project Manager forS o u t h w e s t P i p e l i n e P r o j e c t , E f f e c t i v eO c t o b e r 1 , 1 9 8 9 1 4 0

1 7 ) 1 9 9 0 C o n s t r u c t i o n P l a n s 1 4 0

1 8 ) R e s o l u t i o n s A d o p t e d b y W e s t R i v e rJ o i n t B o a r d , W e s t R i v e r S u p p l yD i s t r i c t a n d T h r e e R u r a l W a t e r C o o p s — 1 4 0

1 9 ) R e s o l u t i o n A d o p t e d b y B o a r d o fD i c k i n s o n C i t y C o m m i s s i o n R e g a r d i n gP r o j e c t 1 6 4

2 0 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l o f t h eA l l o c a t i o n o f F e d e r a l F i s c a l Y e a r1989 Year-End MR&I Water SupplyP r o g r a m F u n d s i n A m o u n t o f $ 2 , 0 3 3 , 0 0 0f o r C o n s t r u c t i o n o f S W P P ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 2 , 0 3 3 , 0 0 0f r o m 1 9 8 9 Y e a r - E n d M R & I F u n d s 1 7 2

2 1 ) S W C C o m m e n t s t h a t S o u t h w e s t P i p e l i n eP r o j e c t i s o f H i g h P r i o r i t y w h e nR e a l l o c a t i o n o f F i s c a l Y e a r 1 9 9 0F u n d s a r e D e t e r m i n e d 1 8 0

S p r y n c z y n a t y k , D a v i d A :

1) Appo in tment as Act ing Sta te Eng ineera n d C h i e f E n g i n e e r - S e c r e t a r y t oS t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o n , E f f e c t i v eJ u n e 1 , 1 9 8 9 5 3

2 ) A p p o i n t m e n t a s N o r t h D a k o t a S t a t eE n g i n e e r a n d C h i e f E n g i n e e r - S e c r e t a r yt o S t a t e Wa t e r C o m m i s s i o n , E f f e c t i v eJ u l y 7 , 1 9 8 9 1 0 2

State Engineer and Chief Engineer-Secretaryo f S t a t e Wa t e r C o m m i s s i o n - R e s i g n a t i o no f V e r n o n F a h y , E f f e c t i v e M a y 3 1 , 1 9 8 9 5 3 , 7 6

S t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o n ;

1 ) R e v i e w R e l a t i v e t o P a s t S t a n c e S t a t eW a t e r C o m m i s s i o n h a s T a k e n o nS u p p o r t i n g L e g i s l a t i o n o n S t a t e a n dF e d e r a l L e v e l s 3

2 ) S t a t e E n g i n e e r ' s R u l e s a n dR e g u l a t i o n s :

a ) D r a f t a n d H e a r i n g s S c h e d u l e d 7 3

4 ) A p p o i n t m e n t o f D a v i d A . S p r y n c z y n a t y ka s A c t i n g S t a t e E n g i n e e r a n d C h i e fE n g i n e e r - S e c r e t a r y t o S t a t e W a t e rC o m m i s s i o n , E f f e c t i v e J u n e 1 , 1 9 8 9 5 3

5 ) A p p o i n t m e n t o f D a v i d A . S p r y n c z y n a t y ka s S t a t e E n g i n e e r a n d C h i e f E n g i n e e r -S e c r e t a r y t o S t a t e Wa t e r C o m m i s s i o n ,E f f e c t i v e J u l y 7 , 1 9 8 9 1 0 2

3 ) R e s i g n a t i o n o f S t a t e E n g i n e e r a n dC h i e f E n g i n e e r - S e c r e t a r y t o S t a t eWate r Commiss ion , Ve rnon Fahy,E f f e c t i v e M a y 3 1 , 1 9 8 9 5 3 , 7 6

6 ) C o n t r a c t F u n d C a r r y o v e r 9 0 , 1 1 8

7 ) D a l e F r i n k , N a m e d a s D i r e c t o r o fE n g i n e e r i n g t o S t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o n ,E f f e c t i v e A u g u s t 2 3 , 1 9 8 9 1 2 2

8 ) P resen ta t i on by S ta te Eng inee r, S ta teWa t e r C o m m i s s i o n D i v i s i o n D i r e c t o r s ,a n d D i r e c t o r o f A t m o s p h e r i c R e s o u r c e so n D u t i e s a n d R e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s o fS p e c i fi c D i v i s i o n s 1 3 5

9 ) D i s c u s s i o n R e l a t i v e t o R e i m b u r s e m e n to f E x p e n s e s f o r S t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o nM e m b e r s 1 3 8 , 1 5 7 , 1 8 2

1 0 ) 1 9 8 9 C o n s t r u c t i o n S e a s o n R e p o r t 1 8 2

11) SWC Considerat ion and Approval ofReques t f r om Apo l l o S ign Company t oP l a c e S i g n o n S t a t e W a t e r C o m m i s s i o nP r o p e r t y 1 8 4

S t e e l e C o u n t y W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -Considerat ion of Request for Cost Shar ingi n I m p r o v i n g G o l d e n - R u s h L a k e O u t l e tC h a n n e l ;** SWC Approval of $9,950

( $ 7 , 0 5 0 f r o m C o n t r a c t F u n d a n dBa lance SWC Eng inee r i ng Se rv i ces )


St ree ter Water Supp ly Pro jec t - Cons idera t ionof Request for MR&I Water Supply ProgramFunds f o r Feas ib i l i t y S tudy ;

** SWC Approval of $5,625 MR&I Fundsr S ( 7 5 % o f s t u d y C o s t s ) g

S w a m p b u s t e r L e g i s l a t i o n ( S B 2 0 3 5 ) :

1 ) S W C D i s c u s s i o n o f S B 2 0 3 5

2 ) S W C C o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d A p p r o v a l t oS u p p o r t P r i n c i p l e s o f S B 2 0 3 5

To w n e r , C i t y o f - C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o rC o s t S h a r i n g f o r W a t e r S u p p l y I n v e s t i g a t i o n ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 4 , 5 0 0 f r o mC o n t r a c t F u n d 1 1 1

Wa t e r E d u c a t i o n f o r Te a c h e r s P r o g r a m ( W E T ) :

1 ) WET Workshop - S ta te Wate r Commiss ionP r e s e n t a t i o n a n d M i n i - W o r k s h o p

2) Dennis Nelson - Resignat ion of ProgramC o o r d i n a t o r , E f f e c t i v e 1 1 - 1 5 - 8 9

W a t e r a n d W i l d l i f e D e v e l o p m e n t E f f o r t -SWC Cons ide ra t i on and App rova l o f $10 ,000f o r P r o j e c t ( w i t h N o r t h D a k o t a W a t e rU s e r s A s s o c i a t i o n )

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 1 0 , 0 0 0

W e l l s C o u n t y W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -C o n s i d e r a t i o n o f R e q u e s t f o r A d d i t i o n a lC o s t S h a r i n g a n d R e a p p r o p r i a t i o n o fA p p r o v e d C a r r y - O v e r F u n d i n g f o r H e i m d a lD r a i n p r o j e c t ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 5 8 , 8 1 5( 4 0 % o f E l i g i b l e P r o j e c t C o s t s ) - •

W e l l s C o u n t y W a t e r R e s o u r c e D i s t r i c t -Considerat ion of Request for Cost Shar ingin Wate r Supp ly Inves t iga t i on fo r We l l sC o u n t y ;** SWC Approval of $17,205

Wet lands and Water Management Proposa l -SWC Consideration and Approval of Projecta n d A c c e p t a n c e o f I n v i t a t i o n t o P a r t i c i p a t ei n t h e P r o j e c t a n d t o D e s i g n a t e S t a f f P e r s o nt o S e r v e a s a P r i n c i p a l I n v e s t i g a t o r,S p o n s o r e d b y N o r t h D a k o t a W a t e r U s e r sA s s o c i a t i o n 1 3 3

W i s h e k Wa t e r S u p p l y P r o j e c t - C o n s i d e r a t i o nof Request for MR&I Water Supply ProgramF u n d s f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y ;

* * S W C A p p r o v a l o f $ 6 , 7 5 0 M R & I F u n d s 9

Y e l l o w s t o n e R i v e r - C o n c e r n s o f L a n d o w n e r sR e l a t i v e t o J e t t y W o r k o n O p p o s i t e S i d eo f R i v e r

consideration of request for cost sharing for sheyenne ... · bottineau county water resource...

Documents