contract drafting class 6 thurs feb 2 university of houston law center d. c. toedt iii
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Contract DraftingClass 6Thurs Feb 2
University of Houston Law Center
D. C. Toedt III
![Page 2: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Course fine-tuning
![Page 3: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Priorities
Invest the most time on the most-frequent and/or most-important contract provisions
Spot other issues Drafting “style” goal: Basic competence Won’t try to cover the entire Z&B or Stark
book
![Page 4: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
General format: Lectures
Questions to answer I’ll make the questions available in advance as
much as I can manage it Each student writes down individual
answer Consult your teammates, during or before
class Questions are likely to show up on the final
![Page 5: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
General format: Assignments
Tuesdays: Homework assignments dueDrafting exercisesSubstantive questionsNot graded unless otherwise announced in
advance Thursdays: In-class negotiation exercises
Focus on the most-important and/or most-frequent provisions
![Page 6: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Homework assignment
Stark Exercise 18-5 – bring to class on Tuesday Feb. 7
![Page 7: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
In the news …
![Page 8: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Scenario 1:
Δ Seller provides geological report to π Buyer
K has warranty disclaimer
Geo. report proves wrong; π Buyer sues for fraud
Δ MJMOL - result?
Result dictated by Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 341 S.W. 3d 323, 333-37 (Tex. 2011)
![Page 9: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Scenario 2:
Δ Seller provides geological report to π Buyer
K has warranty disclaimer + express reliance disclaimer
Geo. report proves wrong; π Buyer sues for fraud
Δ MSJ - result?
Amco Energy, Inc. f.k.a. Capco Energy, Inc. v. Tana Exploration Co., No. 11-20264 (5th Cir. Jan. 30, 2012)
![Page 10: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Microsoft NDA – confidentiality provisions
![Page 11: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Confidential information vs. trade secret Should NDA distinguish between "con-
fidential information" and "trade secrets"?A. No – legally identical
B. Yes – perpetual protection for a trade secret
C. No – little or no practical difference
D. Yes – trade secret can be protected even with no confidentiality precautions
![Page 12: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
QUESTION: Should an NDA include a “sunset” clause
that ends the receiving party’s confidentiality obligations? (Careful – trick question ….)A. Yes – “date certain” is good practice
B. No – sunset clause can blow DP’s rights
C. Yes, but only w/ a trade-secret carve-out
D. No – obligations end only if info goes public
![Page 13: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Microsoft NDA – general provisions
![Page 14: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Section 4(e) – entire agreement
Under what circumstances might courts look to extrinsic evidence anyway? (Z&B 21-22)A. Never
B. If contract is ambiguous
C. If justice requires it
D. Assume always
[Write your own answer]
![Page 15: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Entire agreement – alternative language
“This Agreement sets forth the parties’
final, complete, exclu sive, and binding
statement of their agreement concerning
its subject matter.” (Underlining is for
class only)
![Page 16: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Oral modification Gas-station dealer agreement Integration, no-oral-modification π dealers claim Δ Shell orally
committed to a perpetual pricing subsidy Internal Shell docs: Dealers should plan
their businesses around pricing subsidy A. Shell wins? B. Dealers win?
Marcoux v. Shell Oil Prods. Co. LLC, 524 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2008)
![Page 17: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Section 4(e) – waivers
Will courts usually enforce provisions like this?A. Yes
B. No Will courts always enforce provisions like this?
A. Yes
B. No
![Page 18: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Section 4(f) – attorneys’ fess
Is an attorneys’ fees provision necessary to recover fees in a contract lawsuit?A. No – fees can automatically be recovered by law
B. Yes – “American rule” (each party pays own)
C. No, if a statute provides for fees
D. [Some combination of the above]
![Page 19: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Section 4(f) – attorneys’ fess
Who is more likely to be able to recover fees under this provision?A. Disclosing party
B. Receiving party
C. Each is equally likely
![Page 20: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Section 4(f) – attorneys’ fess
FACTS: Disclosing party sues receiving party but loses
QUESTION: Can (victorious) receiving party recover its fees under this provision?A. Yes
B. No
C. Maybe [explain]
![Page 21: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Attorneys’ fees -- “Texas” rule
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 38.001 – who can recover in a contract suit?A. Prevailing party
B. Successful claimant
C. Successful defendant
D. Neither party
E. [Multiples of the above]
![Page 22: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Attorneys’ fees -- “Texas” rule
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 38.001 – Prerequisites:
Written demand on claimClaim not paid w/in 30 daysActually employed attorney
![Page 23: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Attorneys’ fees -- California rule
California Civil Code § 1717: Any attorneys’ fees provision in a contract is deemed a prevailing-party provision
![Page 24: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Forum selection provisions
Courts usually honor them Public-policy exceptions (David v. Goliath) Waiver of forum non conveniens? Waiver of removal right?
![Page 25: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Forum selection – exclusive?
QUESTION: Why might it make sense for P to file suit in D’s home court?
[Hint: Think about what P will have to make happen to get relief, and which venue that might be easier in]
Write your own answer, then discuss w/ teammate
![Page 26: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Forum selection
FACTS: Contract says exclusive forum is “the courts of the State of Texas”
QUESTION: Can you file in federal court?A. Yes
B. No
Doe I v. AOL, LLC, No. 07-15323, (9th Cir. Jan. 16, 2009)
![Page 27: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Governing-law provisions
Courts usually honor them, but with public-policy exceptions, such as:Post-employment non-compete clausesFranchise laws, consumer-protection laws
Must be some relationship to chosen state
![Page 28: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Governing-law provisions
FACTS: 1. Draft K says simply that
Texas law applies.
2. One party is from Oklahoma, one from Tex.
3. Contract will be signed, performed in Okla.
![Page 29: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Governing-law provisions
QUESTION: How best to “fix” contract to be (more) sure Tex. substantive law will apply?A. Drive across state line to sign K in Texas
B. Use exclusive choice-of-forum clause
C. Recite “without regard to choice of law rules”
![Page 30: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Section 4(g) – assignment of K
QUESTION: Are most contracts ordinarily assignable?A. Yes
B. No
C. Yes, with some exceptions
![Page 31: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Assignment of K – Port of NY & NJ
![Page 32: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Review: Signature line
How would the signature block for Microsoft be written?
![Page 33: Contract Drafting Class 6 Thurs Feb 2 University of Houston Law Center D. C. Toedt III](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/56649ced5503460f949bae99/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
End of class