conversion design - mitweb.mit.edu/13a/www/dsgnsymp/hoss.pdf · lt duncan mckay conversion design....
TRANSCRIPT
1
Helicopter Operations Support Ship
LCDR Matt HawksLT Marianne Holt-Phoenix
LT Duncan McKay
Conversion Design
2
SBSE of 2015 MEBAircraft QuantityMV-22 48AH-1Z 18UH-1Y 9CH-53 20
VT UAV 6Total 101
Purpose of Conversion
• HOSS fills the capability gap to transport and support the rotary and tilt-wing portion (Sea Based Support Echelon -SBSE) of the 2015 Marine Expeditionary Brigade (MEB) Air Combat Element (ACE)
• Convert with minimal impact to base design, thus minimizing cost
HOSS DesignAircraft QuantityMV-22 24AH-1Z 9UH-1Y 5CH-53 10
VT UAV 3Total 51
3
Design Philosophy
Design goals:• Maximize ability to
transport aircraft• Minimize changes to
existing design– propulsion– flight deck– other stowage
(vehicle,well deck)
The design must be:• based on an existing
design• able to transit the
Suez and Panama Canals
• not steam-propelled• capable of 20 knots
4
Design Goals & Thresholds
500,000 gallons
200,000 gallons
JP-5 Capacity
2000500Supported Troops
11,000nm7,000nmRange
10070Aircraft Capacity (CH-46 eq. units)
GoalThresholdParameter
5
Modification Factor WeightFactor
Propulsion Plant Changeout 0.4Add Flight Deck 0.4
Miscellaneous Space Conversion 0.2
0.1JP-5 Capacity0.1Supported Troops0.2Range0.6Aircraft Capacity
Weight FactorMOE
MOE/MF Model
6
OMOE vs. Modification Factor
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Total Modification Factor Estimate 0 = most difficult1 = least difficult
OMOE0 = least capable1 = most capable
Optimum Point(most capable, least difficult)
LSD
CV
LHD
LPD-17
LHA
LMSR
Selection of Base Platform
WINNERLHD-8
7
Modifying LHD-8
• Two significant changes:– The former vehicle stowage deck was lowered by 2 ft– An elevator was added to reach the former well deck
• Strength and stability analyses showed all criteria met per DDS 079-1 and SDS 100-1
• Analyzed both Min Op and Fully Loaded conditions (both with and without embarked A/C)
8
Enlarging Upper Vehicle Stowage Deck
9
Internal Aircraft Arrangements
AFT
HANGAR DECK
LOWERAIRCRAFTSTOWAGE DECK
FWD
UPPER AIRCRAFTSTOWAGEDECK
10
Lower Aircraft Stowage Deck
FWD
ELEVATOR
AFT
AH-1
MV-22
11
Upper Aircraft Stowage Deck
AH-1
MV-22
CH-53
AFT
FWD
CARGOELEVATORS
12
Hangar Deck
FWD
MV-22
AH-1
AVIONICSSHOP
AFT
EXTERNALELEVATORS
INTERNALELEVATOR
CARGOELEVATORS
13
Performance Summary
Parameter Threshold Goal HOSS Design
Aircraft Capacity in
CH-46 equivalent
units
70 units 100 units 93 units
Range 7000 nm 11000 nm 9500 nm
Supported Troops 500
personnel
2000
personnel
1900
personnel
JP-5 Capacity 200,000
gallons
500,000
gallons
484,000
gallons
Notes: • HOSS has significant surge berthing– half of the 2015 MEB SBSE ACE is only 950 troops
• HOSS also maintains medical capability of LHD-8
14
Future Work
• Real cost estimates need to be performed
• Aircraft stowage layout needs to be assessed by the Carrier Analysis Group at NAVAIR Lakehurst, New Jersey
• Some excess ballast tank capacity revealed by POSSE analysis could be utilized as increased JP-5 capacity
15
Questions?
2 HOSS bring the2 HOSS bring the2015 MEB SBSE ACE2015 MEB SBSE ACE
to the fightto the fight