conversion of co2 to fuel and back using high temperature ... · pdf...
TRANSCRIPT
1 29 Sept 2016
Christopher Graves <[email protected]>
Closing the Carbon Cycle: Fuels from Air conference
at Arizona State University, Sept. 28-30, 2016
Conversion of CO2 to fuel and back using high temperature electrochemical cells and solar/wind power
2 29 Sept 2016
CO2-to-fuels: renewable transportation fuels
C. Graves, S.D. Ebbesen, M. Mogensen, K.S. Lackner, Sustainable hydrocarbon fuels by recycling CO2 and H2O with renewable or nuclear energy, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15 (2011) 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.014.
Two sources of CO2 – point sources or the atmosphere
Closed-loop
3 29 Sept 2016
Denmark’s need for energy storage
Expected wind power supply compared with gross electricity consumption in Denmark in 2020 and 2050. The wind power supply data from 2012, obtained from energinet.dk, is simply scaled up so the total for the year comprises 50% and 100% of the total consumption. The electricity consumption is assumed constant; the consumption data from 2012 is used without re-scaling.
Storing excess renewable electricity
CO2 + H2O + electricity hydrocarbons
Electrolysis – on the Danish agenda!
transportation fuel
natural gas network (back to electricity)
4 29 Sept 2016
CO2/power-to-fuels via electrolytic hydrogen production
Ingredients needed:
• Low cost electricity
• High efficiency system
• Low cost electrolysis, CO2 capture, system capital cost
5 29 Sept 2016
Cost drivers for power-to-fuels
OPEX CAPEX
Electricity cost Efficiency Here Stack efficiency System losses Theis O&M
Electrolyzer Resistance Anne Lifetime Anne, Theis, Here Capacity factor Here CO2 capture device Yesterday Balance of system Here
Latest levelized cost of installed solar PV: 2.99 ₵/kWh (Dubai, May ‘16) and 2.91 ₵/kWh (Chile, Aug ‘16)
solarlove
cleantechnica
6 29 Sept 2016
Electrolyzer efficiency and rates (why solid oxide cells?)
C. Graves, S.D. Ebbesen, M. Mogensen, K.S. Lackner, Sustainable hydrocarbon fuels by recycling CO2 and H2O with renewable or nuclear energy, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15 (2011) 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.014.
7 29 Sept 2016
Solid oxide cells: Commercialization
• Mainly SOFC so far for combined heat & power, and recently mobile, applications
– Competes with established gas turbines & engines, but higher efficiency + smaller scale vs turbines
• SOEC for H2/CO production using excess renewable electricity
– H2 production competes with established alkaline electrolyzers, but with higher efficiency
– CO production for on-site specialty-gas supply – HTAS initial niche market
– Small markets at the moment, huge growth expected
Bloom Energy Servers (SOFC) 100s of MW installed since 2010
at Apple, AT&T, Bank of America, Coca-Cola, eBay, Google, Ikea, Kellogg, Target, Wal-Mart…
Nissan announced EV with SOFC range-extender that runs on bio-ethanol (June 2016)
8 29 Sept 2016
Stack mass production – factory economies of scale
D. Villareal PhD thesis, 2016 Well suited to achieving very low cost by automated mass
production like in the electronics and automotive industries (and electronics-like energy technology like solar PV and batteries)
9 29 Sept 2016
Cost drivers for power-to-fuels
OPEX CAPEX
Electricity cost Efficiency Here Stack efficiency System losses Theis O&M
Electrolyzer Resistance Anne Lifetime Anne, Theis, Here Capacity factor Here CO2 capture device Yesterday Balance of system Here
D. Villareal PhD thesis, 2016
10 29 Sept 2016
Balance of system cost and size (handling gas and heat flows)
D. Villareal PhD thesis, 2016
• Literature studies estimate the SOC stack cost at 10-20% of the total installed CAPEX depending on system design
• Heat exchangers, power electronics, installation are each estimated to cost equal to double that amount
12 29 Sept 2016
Power-to-methanol plants
Carbon Recycling International (CRI) alkaline H2O electrolysis + CO2+H2 to methanol
SOEC methanol plant design (Haldor Topsoe)
J.B. Hansen, N. Christiansen, J.U. Nielsen, Production of Sustainable Fuels by Means of Solid Oxide Electrolysis, in: ECS Transactions 35(1), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2011: pp. 2941–2948. doi:10.1149/1.3570293
Currently operational Proposed, conventional chemical plant
13 29 Sept 2016
Power-to-methanol device
S.H. Jensen, X. Sun, S.D. Ebbesen, R. Knibbe, M. Mogensen, Hydrogen and synthetic fuel production using pressurized solid oxide electrolysis cells, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 35 (2010) 9544–9549. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.065.
Proposed: integrated, self-contained, mass-produced, everything at 50 bar
System scale Efficiency CAPEX Installation cost
CRI operating plant Large ~50% High High
HTAS plant design Large 80% High High
Proposed Small 80%+ Low Low
14 29 Sept 2016
Power-to-fuel devices
Commercialized MicroCHP / micro power generation
Let’s aim for Micro power-to-fuel production
Bloom boxes
15 29 Sept 2016
Lowering the system cost
• Mass production
• Integration
• Reversible operation
OPEX CAPEX
Electricity cost Efficiency Here Stack efficiency System losses Theis O&M
Electrolyzer Resistance Anne Lifetime Anne, Theis, Here Capacity factor Here CO2 capture device Yesterday Balance of system Here
16 29 Sept 2016
Reversible operation of solid oxide cells
(H2O not shown)
Conversion of CO2 to fuel and back using high temperature electrochemical cells and solar/wind power
17 29 Sept 2016
Reversible operation of solid oxide cells
Fuel cell mode
fuels electricity
Electrolysis mode
electricity fuels
current density (A/cm2)
C. Graves, S.D. Ebbesen, M. Mogensen, Co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O in solid oxide cells: Performance and durability, Solid State Ionics. 192 (2011) 398–403. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2010.06.014.
Perform almost equally well in both modes
18 29 Sept 2016
Reversible operation yields longer cell lifetime
Constant electrolysis vs charge-discharge cycles
C. Graves, S.D. Ebbesen, S.H. Jensen, S.B. Simonsen, M.B. Mogensen, Eliminating degradation in solid oxide electrochemical cells by reversible operation, Nature Materials. 14 (2015) 239–244. doi:10.1038/nmat4165.
Highly enhanced stability!
19 29 Sept 2016
Two scenarios for reversible operation
Controlled directly by time-series data:
1. Electricity supply/demand – energy balancing driven
– 100% wind for a Danish island
– Power-to-methanol(-to-power)
2. Spot market prices of electricity and natural gas – price driven
– Power-to-methane (buy electricity, sell gas)
– Natural gas-to-power (buy gas, sell electricity)
Capacity factor increase by market expansion
20 29 Sept 2016
100% wind power for a Danish island
Existing wind power supply scaled up to meet total energy demand (electricity + fuel)
(and heat demand met as byproduct because all energy conversion losses are in the form of heat)
electricity, 2.3
electric heat, 1.6
heat (district),
4.9
solar heat, 0.03 biomass
heat, 0.32
oil heat, 2.39
diesel transport,
6.95
gasoline transport,
1.85
Minus ~4 MWavg diesel for ferries (shown here but not included in balancing) C. Graves, J.V.T Høgh, M. Chen,
et al (in preparation)
21 29 Sept 2016
Long-term load-balancing stack test
Actual stack data
Energy balancing simulation
8-cell stack
800 °C
C. Graves, J.V.T Høgh, M. Chen, et al (in preparation)
23 29 Sept 2016
Meth-anol
synth.
Fuel cell mode
Anode recycling
H2O(g)
+CO2 (+H2+CO)
CH3OH
Meth-anator CH4
O2
H2O(l)
heat
O2
CO2 (+H2+CO)
O2 H2O
SOC stack
electricity
HX fluid
1
2
3
4
heat
HX fluid
Recycle
Co-electrolysis
H2O(g)
+CO2 (+H2+CO)
CH3OH
Meth-anator CH4
O2 H2O(l)
O2
CO2 (+H2+CO)
O2 H2O
SOC stack
electricity
1
2
3
4
Electrolysis mode
Meth-anol
synth. heat
DME synth.
System runs independently.
DME synth.
Recycle
800 °C
<1.4V, <1 A/cm2
800 °C
>0.8V, <0.5 A/cm2
In SOC stack:
CH4+1.5H2O+0.5CO2+Q3.5H2+1.5CO2
H2+CO2 +QshiftH2O+CO
H2+½O2 H2O+E+Q
In SOC stack:
CO2+2H2O+ECO+2H2 (+1.5O2)
H2+CO2 H2O+CO
(4H2+CO2CH4+2H2O+Q at suitable T and P)
System runs independently. Air
capture System runs independently.
Air capture
System runs independently.
The reforming composition for the first reaction is just an example and not the real one.
C. Graves, J.V.T Høgh, M. Chen, et al (in preparation)
24 29 Sept 2016
Electricity price driven
Energikoncept 2035 scenario, energinet.dk
From Norway
Peaking generation (SOFC)
Storage (SOEC)
Spot market prices, 2008, energinet.dk
Operate electrolysis mode
Operate fuel-cell mode
Reversible operation in the Danish scenario
25 29 Sept 2016
Reversible operation controlled by electricity & gas spot prices
D. Villareal PhD thesis, 2016
Electrolysis mode switch
26 29 Sept 2016
Electrolysis mode growing each year as wind supply grows
D. Villareal PhD thesis, 2016
Mode of operation per year Profits from each mode per year
• Near term: price volatility due growing variable wind is good for reversible systems (short periods of electrolysis high profits)
• With predicted 2050 time-seies data (100% wind electricity supply), profits by playing this game are much higher, even though the reversible system may erode the volatility and make per hour profit from electrolysis lower
27 29 Sept 2016
If we will turn around and convert it right back to electricity, need not be convenient, portable, high energy density and plug into existing infrastructure – need not be liquid hydrocarbon storage.
Overall fuel production cost (after mass production scale-up)
C. Graves, S.D. Ebbesen, M. Mogensen, K.S. Lackner, Sustainable hydrocarbon fuels by recycling CO2 and H2O with renewable or nuclear energy, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15 (2011) 1–23.
100% capacity factor 20% capacity factor
28 29 Sept 2016
Conclusions
• High temperature electrochemical cells offer a higher efficiency CO2/power-to-fuels system
• Lower cost expected by mass produced integrated device
• Lower cost by reversible operation: – longer lifetime
– Increased capacity factor (dual markets) with only minimal system cost increase to add fuel-cell mode
• Low cost solar/wind power has arrived – Grid surplus in spot markets
– Standalone solar PV < 3 ₵/kWh
Now we need to get the power-to-fuel technology ready!
29 29 Sept 2016
Acknowledgements
Diego Villarreal PhD project with
Klaus Lackner
Ming Chen
Jón S.G. Mýrdal
Peter V. Hendriksen
Jens Høgh
Karsten Agersted
and other colleagues at DTU Energy
Funding: projects:
“Solid Oxide Electrolysis for Grid Balancing” (2013-1-12013)
“Towards Solid Oxide Electrolysis Plants in 2020” (2015-1-12276)
“Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for the Renew-able Energy Transition” (2014-1-12231)