corporate communication and public relations practice monitor 2010

44
8/17/2019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/corporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1/44 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010 Report observatory CORPORATE COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC RELATIONS swiss  An initiative by BPRA, HarbourClub, pr suisse, SPRI and USI Sponsored by  YJOO Communications, Linkgroup and Adecco, Adwired

Upload: doina-marcu

Post on 06-Jul-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 144

Corporate Communication

and Public RelationsPractice Monitor2010 Report

observatory CORPORATE COMMUNICATION

AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

swiss

An initiative by BPRA HarbourClub

pr suisse SPRI and USI

Sponsored by

YJOO Communications Linkgroup

and Adecco Adwired

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 244

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

1Content

About the Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2

About the sponsors of this report 5

About this report 7

1 Demographics 811 Respondentsrsquo general profile 8

12 A highly networked profession 11

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them 13

2 Industry trends 15Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

3 The Practice of Corporate Communication 1731 Communication channels are all equally important 18

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focused approach 18

33 Communication disciplines the growing importance of community relations

and internal communication 20

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnerships sponsorship

and philanthropy 21

4 Strategy 2341 One third of all communication managers feel involved in business decisions 23

42 Communication professionals are partially in charge of corporate branding 24

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap between Communication and HR 25

5 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions 2751 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communication and Marketing 27

52 Communication and Marketing two independent but coordinated functions 28

6 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output 30

7 ClientndashAgency relationship 3271 Budget changes relatively stable budget 32

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphical and design work 32

73 Companies value fixed project fee 33

74 Reasons for working with communication consultancies

mismatched perceptions among agencies and companies 33

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciated agency qualities 35

8 Professional development 3681 Communication professionals have clearly articulated expertise needs 36

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from short courses and theoretical

knowledge from long programs 40

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 444

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

3About

About the Swiss CorporateCommunication and Public RelationsObservatory

The Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory ndash an ini-

tiative of BPRA HarbourClub pr suisse SPRI and USI ndash generates knowledge

about the state and evolution of the communication profession in Switzerland

with the aim of supporting its development The knowledge created and dis-

seminated by the Observatory contributes to raising standards throughout the

profession honing educational and training curricula identifying research

needs and promoting the industry as a whole

Association of PR Agencies in Switzerland (BPRA)

The Association of Swiss PR Agencies (BPRA) unites the leading PR agencies in

Switzerland ndash namely those who have a proven track record in terms of size

experience and quality All BPRA agencies commit themselves to CMS II quality

certification BPRA also aims to achieve a high level of professional advisory

skills and market transparency among its members

HarbourClub

HarbourClub offers its members ndash namely chief communications officers of

Swiss organizations ndash an exclusive networking platform through which these

leading communications professionals can exchange personal experiences ad-

dress new and future challenges in corporate communications and promote

informal contacts among professional colleagues An additional goal is to pro-

fessionalize and distinguish the corporate communications function

pr suisse the Swiss Public Relations Association (SPRV)

pr suisse is a professional organization with more than 1700 members in seven

regional divisions Founded in 1954 as the Swiss Public Relations Society (SPRG)

with the scope of supporting the development of the profession as well as of

specialized educational programs the association today also administers the

federal examination board for PR professionals (Pruumlfungskommission) as well as

the professional register (Berufsregister)

Swiss Public Relations Institute (SPRI)

SPRI founded in 1969 provides undergraduate and continuing education op-

portunities for communications specialists emphasizing direct and practical

experience SPRI takes a holistic approach to the training of communicationspractitioners offering an education that is both academic and practical With

more than 8000 graduates to date SPRI conducts courses in Zurich Berne

Lausanne and Geneva Its 120 lecturers represent a wide cross section of Swiss

PR practitioners further strengthening SPRIrsquos vital link to the communications

community

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI)

The Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI) founded in 1996 comprises four fac-

ulties economics communication sciences and informatics in Lugano as well

as architecture in Mendrisio USI has a total student population of more than

2800 from 35 countries and a teaching staff of 650 professors lecturers and as-

sistants Benefiting from its unique geographic and cultural location USI is a

distinguished multilingual and multicultural university with a broad interna-

tional outlook

Swiss Public Relations Institute (SPRI)

wwwsprich

Association of PR Agencies

in Switzerland (BPRA)

wwwbprach

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI)

wwwusich

HarbourClub

wwwharbourclubch

pr suisse the Swiss Public Relations

Association (SPRV)

wwwpr-suissech

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

5Sponsors

Lead sponsors

YJOO sees communication as an interdisciplinary strategic and corporate func-

tion thus it focuses on bringing together strategy communication and design

YJOO creates enables and conducts research serving as a general contractor for

communications With branches in Zurich St Gallen and Lugano and partners

in Berne and Geneva our 27 employees provide support for both national and

international companies and organizations

We are a specialist partner for the production of electronic and print media

Depending on the requirements of our customers we can provide a complete

range of corporate publishing services as an integrated full-service provider or

specific services in collaboration with external partners Our service package

Financial Publishing is developed specially for companies both listed and un-

listed that understand the value of professional reporting We see electronic

and print media as an integrated whole Linkgrouprsquos Printlink printing center

makes it the first and unique MINERGIEreg-certified company in the Swiss graphic

arts industry Linkgroup intelligent solutions sustainable production

Supporting sponsors

Adecco

The Adecco Group is the worldrsquos leading provider of human resource solutions

With over 28000 employees and 5700 offices in more than 60 countries and

territories around the world Adecco Group offers a wide variety of services

connecting approximately 500000 colleagues with more than 100000 clients

every day

Adwired Adwired makes news and opinion markets accessible for decision makers of

leading international companies The range of services includes qualified media

monitoring media analysis and selective research in archives of more than

10000 print and social media sources as well as temporary support in emerging

issues Adwired solutions are at the leading edge of high-end media monitoring

About the sponsors of this report

l ink roup

YJOO STRATEGY COMMUNICATION DESIGN

YJOO

Strategy Communication Design

wwwyjooch

Linkgroup

Intelligent solutions sustainable production

wwwlinkgroupch

Adecco

wwwadeccoch

Adwired

wwwadwiredch

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

6 Introduction

The following four main aims formed the base for the 2010 Swiss Corporate

Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor

ndash investigate the professionrsquos practices and their evolution

ndash evaluate the integration of the communication practice

within the management practice

ndash identify trends influencing communication practice

ndash detect the needs for educational and personal development

Survey methods

The survey was administrated online from February 10 to 28 2010 Questions

were available in four languages German French Italian and English

The survey included 29 questions structured in 4 main parts (1) domain (2)

management (3) professional development and (4) demographics Respondents

required approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire

The formulation of each question was differentiated in order to take into con-

sideration the six different respondent profiles (i e agency CEO agency pro-

fessional with budget agency professional without budget company CCO

company professional with budget and company professional without budget)

Professionals from public administration non-profit organizations and or

non-governmental organizations were asked to answer questions formulated

under the company category

Sample Approximately 3500 professionals were invited to complete the questionnaire

Invitations were sent directly by the Observatory partners (SPRI SPRV BPRA

HarbourClub and USI) using their databases

The survey was also publicized on partnersrsquo websites as well as through the

main Swiss trade online portals

Ultimately 513 valid replies (approximately a 15 response rate) were ana-

lyzed

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data The 19 questions of the

main part of the questionnaire were also cross-analyzed with most of the

demographic data that emerged from the remaining 10 questions Some ofthe 19 questions were cross-analyzed with non-demographic data as well

(eg data signaling the level of strategic focus in the communication practice)

Finally where possible and appropriate some data were compared to the

results of the European Communication Monitor (ECM) and the American

Generally Accepted Practices (GAP) study

Only statistically significant results were considered (Cramerrsquos V test where

p le 005) In addition some totals may not equal 100 due to rounding

About this report

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

7Introduction

Authors

This report was written by a research team from the Institute of Marketing and

Communication Management (IMCA) of the Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

(USI) comprised of

ndash Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate Communication

ndash Tatiana Aldyukhova Teaching Assistant

ndash Ulrike Dixius Student Assistant

ndash Jost Reinhold Teaching Assistant

The team was supported by a Steering Committee comprised of the following

members

ndash Markus Berger Director SPRI amp Board Member SPRV

ndash Roman Geiser Chief Operating Officer EMEA and Chairman Switzerland

Burson-Marsteller amp President BPRA

ndash Stephan Howeg Global Head Group Communications Adecco management

and consulting SA amp Board Member HarbourClub and SPRI

ndash Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag amp President pr suisse

ndash Marion Starck President SPRI

ndash Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO Communications AG amp Board Member

BPRA and SPRI

Quotation

Lurati F Aldyukhova T Dixius U and Reinhold J (2010) Swiss CorporateCommunications and Public Relations Practice Monitor Zurich and Lugano

Swiss Corporate Communications and Public Relations Observatory

Contact person

Francesco Lurati

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

Via G Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

+41 (0)58 666 4582

francescoluratiusich

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1044

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

8

1 Demographics

11 Respondentsrsquo general profile

A total of 513 public relations and communication specialists participated in

the first Swiss Observatory Practice survey Of these respondents 356 work

in companies while the remaining 157 come from public relations agencies

and communication consultancies The survey reached all linguistic regions of

Switzerland with 752 of participants originating from the German-speaking

part [1]

A large number of company CCOs along with agency CEOs participated in thesurvey In fact 175 of all respondents are CEOs of a public relations agency or

a communication consultancy and 201 are CCOs of companies The majority

of the respondents ndash 310 ndash are company professionals with budget responsi-

bility [2]

[1] Q 27 (asked to all) In which part of Switzerland are you normally based Response items German-speaking partFrench-speaking part Italian-speaking part Rumantsch-speaking part

[2] In order to make the survey more effective it was designed for six different professional profiles (1) Agency CEO

(2) Agency Professional with budget (3) Agency Professional without budget (4) Company CCO (5) Company

Professional with budget and (6) Company Professional without budget In the current report footnotes in italics

will indicate (where applicable) which questions were asked to which profiles (numbered 1 to 6) If no specific refer-

ence to different profiles is made ldquoasked to allrdquo will signal that all six profiles were asked to answer

Language regions ()

983150 752 German

983150 216 French

983150 29 Italian

983150 02 Rumantsch

Respondentsrsquo position in the organization ()

983150 175 Agency CEO983150 82 Agency Professional with budget

983150 49 Agency Professional without budget

983150 201 Corporate CCO

983150 310 Corporate Professional with budget

983150 183 Corporate Professional without budget

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 2: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 244

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

1Content

About the Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2

About the sponsors of this report 5

About this report 7

1 Demographics 811 Respondentsrsquo general profile 8

12 A highly networked profession 11

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them 13

2 Industry trends 15Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

3 The Practice of Corporate Communication 1731 Communication channels are all equally important 18

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focused approach 18

33 Communication disciplines the growing importance of community relations

and internal communication 20

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnerships sponsorship

and philanthropy 21

4 Strategy 2341 One third of all communication managers feel involved in business decisions 23

42 Communication professionals are partially in charge of corporate branding 24

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap between Communication and HR 25

5 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions 2751 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communication and Marketing 27

52 Communication and Marketing two independent but coordinated functions 28

6 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output 30

7 ClientndashAgency relationship 3271 Budget changes relatively stable budget 32

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphical and design work 32

73 Companies value fixed project fee 33

74 Reasons for working with communication consultancies

mismatched perceptions among agencies and companies 33

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciated agency qualities 35

8 Professional development 3681 Communication professionals have clearly articulated expertise needs 36

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from short courses and theoretical

knowledge from long programs 40

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 444

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

3About

About the Swiss CorporateCommunication and Public RelationsObservatory

The Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory ndash an ini-

tiative of BPRA HarbourClub pr suisse SPRI and USI ndash generates knowledge

about the state and evolution of the communication profession in Switzerland

with the aim of supporting its development The knowledge created and dis-

seminated by the Observatory contributes to raising standards throughout the

profession honing educational and training curricula identifying research

needs and promoting the industry as a whole

Association of PR Agencies in Switzerland (BPRA)

The Association of Swiss PR Agencies (BPRA) unites the leading PR agencies in

Switzerland ndash namely those who have a proven track record in terms of size

experience and quality All BPRA agencies commit themselves to CMS II quality

certification BPRA also aims to achieve a high level of professional advisory

skills and market transparency among its members

HarbourClub

HarbourClub offers its members ndash namely chief communications officers of

Swiss organizations ndash an exclusive networking platform through which these

leading communications professionals can exchange personal experiences ad-

dress new and future challenges in corporate communications and promote

informal contacts among professional colleagues An additional goal is to pro-

fessionalize and distinguish the corporate communications function

pr suisse the Swiss Public Relations Association (SPRV)

pr suisse is a professional organization with more than 1700 members in seven

regional divisions Founded in 1954 as the Swiss Public Relations Society (SPRG)

with the scope of supporting the development of the profession as well as of

specialized educational programs the association today also administers the

federal examination board for PR professionals (Pruumlfungskommission) as well as

the professional register (Berufsregister)

Swiss Public Relations Institute (SPRI)

SPRI founded in 1969 provides undergraduate and continuing education op-

portunities for communications specialists emphasizing direct and practical

experience SPRI takes a holistic approach to the training of communicationspractitioners offering an education that is both academic and practical With

more than 8000 graduates to date SPRI conducts courses in Zurich Berne

Lausanne and Geneva Its 120 lecturers represent a wide cross section of Swiss

PR practitioners further strengthening SPRIrsquos vital link to the communications

community

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI)

The Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI) founded in 1996 comprises four fac-

ulties economics communication sciences and informatics in Lugano as well

as architecture in Mendrisio USI has a total student population of more than

2800 from 35 countries and a teaching staff of 650 professors lecturers and as-

sistants Benefiting from its unique geographic and cultural location USI is a

distinguished multilingual and multicultural university with a broad interna-

tional outlook

Swiss Public Relations Institute (SPRI)

wwwsprich

Association of PR Agencies

in Switzerland (BPRA)

wwwbprach

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI)

wwwusich

HarbourClub

wwwharbourclubch

pr suisse the Swiss Public Relations

Association (SPRV)

wwwpr-suissech

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

5Sponsors

Lead sponsors

YJOO sees communication as an interdisciplinary strategic and corporate func-

tion thus it focuses on bringing together strategy communication and design

YJOO creates enables and conducts research serving as a general contractor for

communications With branches in Zurich St Gallen and Lugano and partners

in Berne and Geneva our 27 employees provide support for both national and

international companies and organizations

We are a specialist partner for the production of electronic and print media

Depending on the requirements of our customers we can provide a complete

range of corporate publishing services as an integrated full-service provider or

specific services in collaboration with external partners Our service package

Financial Publishing is developed specially for companies both listed and un-

listed that understand the value of professional reporting We see electronic

and print media as an integrated whole Linkgrouprsquos Printlink printing center

makes it the first and unique MINERGIEreg-certified company in the Swiss graphic

arts industry Linkgroup intelligent solutions sustainable production

Supporting sponsors

Adecco

The Adecco Group is the worldrsquos leading provider of human resource solutions

With over 28000 employees and 5700 offices in more than 60 countries and

territories around the world Adecco Group offers a wide variety of services

connecting approximately 500000 colleagues with more than 100000 clients

every day

Adwired Adwired makes news and opinion markets accessible for decision makers of

leading international companies The range of services includes qualified media

monitoring media analysis and selective research in archives of more than

10000 print and social media sources as well as temporary support in emerging

issues Adwired solutions are at the leading edge of high-end media monitoring

About the sponsors of this report

l ink roup

YJOO STRATEGY COMMUNICATION DESIGN

YJOO

Strategy Communication Design

wwwyjooch

Linkgroup

Intelligent solutions sustainable production

wwwlinkgroupch

Adecco

wwwadeccoch

Adwired

wwwadwiredch

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

6 Introduction

The following four main aims formed the base for the 2010 Swiss Corporate

Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor

ndash investigate the professionrsquos practices and their evolution

ndash evaluate the integration of the communication practice

within the management practice

ndash identify trends influencing communication practice

ndash detect the needs for educational and personal development

Survey methods

The survey was administrated online from February 10 to 28 2010 Questions

were available in four languages German French Italian and English

The survey included 29 questions structured in 4 main parts (1) domain (2)

management (3) professional development and (4) demographics Respondents

required approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire

The formulation of each question was differentiated in order to take into con-

sideration the six different respondent profiles (i e agency CEO agency pro-

fessional with budget agency professional without budget company CCO

company professional with budget and company professional without budget)

Professionals from public administration non-profit organizations and or

non-governmental organizations were asked to answer questions formulated

under the company category

Sample Approximately 3500 professionals were invited to complete the questionnaire

Invitations were sent directly by the Observatory partners (SPRI SPRV BPRA

HarbourClub and USI) using their databases

The survey was also publicized on partnersrsquo websites as well as through the

main Swiss trade online portals

Ultimately 513 valid replies (approximately a 15 response rate) were ana-

lyzed

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data The 19 questions of the

main part of the questionnaire were also cross-analyzed with most of the

demographic data that emerged from the remaining 10 questions Some ofthe 19 questions were cross-analyzed with non-demographic data as well

(eg data signaling the level of strategic focus in the communication practice)

Finally where possible and appropriate some data were compared to the

results of the European Communication Monitor (ECM) and the American

Generally Accepted Practices (GAP) study

Only statistically significant results were considered (Cramerrsquos V test where

p le 005) In addition some totals may not equal 100 due to rounding

About this report

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

7Introduction

Authors

This report was written by a research team from the Institute of Marketing and

Communication Management (IMCA) of the Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

(USI) comprised of

ndash Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate Communication

ndash Tatiana Aldyukhova Teaching Assistant

ndash Ulrike Dixius Student Assistant

ndash Jost Reinhold Teaching Assistant

The team was supported by a Steering Committee comprised of the following

members

ndash Markus Berger Director SPRI amp Board Member SPRV

ndash Roman Geiser Chief Operating Officer EMEA and Chairman Switzerland

Burson-Marsteller amp President BPRA

ndash Stephan Howeg Global Head Group Communications Adecco management

and consulting SA amp Board Member HarbourClub and SPRI

ndash Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag amp President pr suisse

ndash Marion Starck President SPRI

ndash Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO Communications AG amp Board Member

BPRA and SPRI

Quotation

Lurati F Aldyukhova T Dixius U and Reinhold J (2010) Swiss CorporateCommunications and Public Relations Practice Monitor Zurich and Lugano

Swiss Corporate Communications and Public Relations Observatory

Contact person

Francesco Lurati

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

Via G Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

+41 (0)58 666 4582

francescoluratiusich

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1044

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

8

1 Demographics

11 Respondentsrsquo general profile

A total of 513 public relations and communication specialists participated in

the first Swiss Observatory Practice survey Of these respondents 356 work

in companies while the remaining 157 come from public relations agencies

and communication consultancies The survey reached all linguistic regions of

Switzerland with 752 of participants originating from the German-speaking

part [1]

A large number of company CCOs along with agency CEOs participated in thesurvey In fact 175 of all respondents are CEOs of a public relations agency or

a communication consultancy and 201 are CCOs of companies The majority

of the respondents ndash 310 ndash are company professionals with budget responsi-

bility [2]

[1] Q 27 (asked to all) In which part of Switzerland are you normally based Response items German-speaking partFrench-speaking part Italian-speaking part Rumantsch-speaking part

[2] In order to make the survey more effective it was designed for six different professional profiles (1) Agency CEO

(2) Agency Professional with budget (3) Agency Professional without budget (4) Company CCO (5) Company

Professional with budget and (6) Company Professional without budget In the current report footnotes in italics

will indicate (where applicable) which questions were asked to which profiles (numbered 1 to 6) If no specific refer-

ence to different profiles is made ldquoasked to allrdquo will signal that all six profiles were asked to answer

Language regions ()

983150 752 German

983150 216 French

983150 29 Italian

983150 02 Rumantsch

Respondentsrsquo position in the organization ()

983150 175 Agency CEO983150 82 Agency Professional with budget

983150 49 Agency Professional without budget

983150 201 Corporate CCO

983150 310 Corporate Professional with budget

983150 183 Corporate Professional without budget

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 3: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

1Content

About the Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2

About the sponsors of this report 5

About this report 7

1 Demographics 811 Respondentsrsquo general profile 8

12 A highly networked profession 11

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them 13

2 Industry trends 15Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

3 The Practice of Corporate Communication 1731 Communication channels are all equally important 18

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focused approach 18

33 Communication disciplines the growing importance of community relations

and internal communication 20

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnerships sponsorship

and philanthropy 21

4 Strategy 2341 One third of all communication managers feel involved in business decisions 23

42 Communication professionals are partially in charge of corporate branding 24

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap between Communication and HR 25

5 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions 2751 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communication and Marketing 27

52 Communication and Marketing two independent but coordinated functions 28

6 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output 30

7 ClientndashAgency relationship 3271 Budget changes relatively stable budget 32

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphical and design work 32

73 Companies value fixed project fee 33

74 Reasons for working with communication consultancies

mismatched perceptions among agencies and companies 33

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciated agency qualities 35

8 Professional development 3681 Communication professionals have clearly articulated expertise needs 36

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from short courses and theoretical

knowledge from long programs 40

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 444

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

3About

About the Swiss CorporateCommunication and Public RelationsObservatory

The Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory ndash an ini-

tiative of BPRA HarbourClub pr suisse SPRI and USI ndash generates knowledge

about the state and evolution of the communication profession in Switzerland

with the aim of supporting its development The knowledge created and dis-

seminated by the Observatory contributes to raising standards throughout the

profession honing educational and training curricula identifying research

needs and promoting the industry as a whole

Association of PR Agencies in Switzerland (BPRA)

The Association of Swiss PR Agencies (BPRA) unites the leading PR agencies in

Switzerland ndash namely those who have a proven track record in terms of size

experience and quality All BPRA agencies commit themselves to CMS II quality

certification BPRA also aims to achieve a high level of professional advisory

skills and market transparency among its members

HarbourClub

HarbourClub offers its members ndash namely chief communications officers of

Swiss organizations ndash an exclusive networking platform through which these

leading communications professionals can exchange personal experiences ad-

dress new and future challenges in corporate communications and promote

informal contacts among professional colleagues An additional goal is to pro-

fessionalize and distinguish the corporate communications function

pr suisse the Swiss Public Relations Association (SPRV)

pr suisse is a professional organization with more than 1700 members in seven

regional divisions Founded in 1954 as the Swiss Public Relations Society (SPRG)

with the scope of supporting the development of the profession as well as of

specialized educational programs the association today also administers the

federal examination board for PR professionals (Pruumlfungskommission) as well as

the professional register (Berufsregister)

Swiss Public Relations Institute (SPRI)

SPRI founded in 1969 provides undergraduate and continuing education op-

portunities for communications specialists emphasizing direct and practical

experience SPRI takes a holistic approach to the training of communicationspractitioners offering an education that is both academic and practical With

more than 8000 graduates to date SPRI conducts courses in Zurich Berne

Lausanne and Geneva Its 120 lecturers represent a wide cross section of Swiss

PR practitioners further strengthening SPRIrsquos vital link to the communications

community

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI)

The Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI) founded in 1996 comprises four fac-

ulties economics communication sciences and informatics in Lugano as well

as architecture in Mendrisio USI has a total student population of more than

2800 from 35 countries and a teaching staff of 650 professors lecturers and as-

sistants Benefiting from its unique geographic and cultural location USI is a

distinguished multilingual and multicultural university with a broad interna-

tional outlook

Swiss Public Relations Institute (SPRI)

wwwsprich

Association of PR Agencies

in Switzerland (BPRA)

wwwbprach

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI)

wwwusich

HarbourClub

wwwharbourclubch

pr suisse the Swiss Public Relations

Association (SPRV)

wwwpr-suissech

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

5Sponsors

Lead sponsors

YJOO sees communication as an interdisciplinary strategic and corporate func-

tion thus it focuses on bringing together strategy communication and design

YJOO creates enables and conducts research serving as a general contractor for

communications With branches in Zurich St Gallen and Lugano and partners

in Berne and Geneva our 27 employees provide support for both national and

international companies and organizations

We are a specialist partner for the production of electronic and print media

Depending on the requirements of our customers we can provide a complete

range of corporate publishing services as an integrated full-service provider or

specific services in collaboration with external partners Our service package

Financial Publishing is developed specially for companies both listed and un-

listed that understand the value of professional reporting We see electronic

and print media as an integrated whole Linkgrouprsquos Printlink printing center

makes it the first and unique MINERGIEreg-certified company in the Swiss graphic

arts industry Linkgroup intelligent solutions sustainable production

Supporting sponsors

Adecco

The Adecco Group is the worldrsquos leading provider of human resource solutions

With over 28000 employees and 5700 offices in more than 60 countries and

territories around the world Adecco Group offers a wide variety of services

connecting approximately 500000 colleagues with more than 100000 clients

every day

Adwired Adwired makes news and opinion markets accessible for decision makers of

leading international companies The range of services includes qualified media

monitoring media analysis and selective research in archives of more than

10000 print and social media sources as well as temporary support in emerging

issues Adwired solutions are at the leading edge of high-end media monitoring

About the sponsors of this report

l ink roup

YJOO STRATEGY COMMUNICATION DESIGN

YJOO

Strategy Communication Design

wwwyjooch

Linkgroup

Intelligent solutions sustainable production

wwwlinkgroupch

Adecco

wwwadeccoch

Adwired

wwwadwiredch

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

6 Introduction

The following four main aims formed the base for the 2010 Swiss Corporate

Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor

ndash investigate the professionrsquos practices and their evolution

ndash evaluate the integration of the communication practice

within the management practice

ndash identify trends influencing communication practice

ndash detect the needs for educational and personal development

Survey methods

The survey was administrated online from February 10 to 28 2010 Questions

were available in four languages German French Italian and English

The survey included 29 questions structured in 4 main parts (1) domain (2)

management (3) professional development and (4) demographics Respondents

required approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire

The formulation of each question was differentiated in order to take into con-

sideration the six different respondent profiles (i e agency CEO agency pro-

fessional with budget agency professional without budget company CCO

company professional with budget and company professional without budget)

Professionals from public administration non-profit organizations and or

non-governmental organizations were asked to answer questions formulated

under the company category

Sample Approximately 3500 professionals were invited to complete the questionnaire

Invitations were sent directly by the Observatory partners (SPRI SPRV BPRA

HarbourClub and USI) using their databases

The survey was also publicized on partnersrsquo websites as well as through the

main Swiss trade online portals

Ultimately 513 valid replies (approximately a 15 response rate) were ana-

lyzed

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data The 19 questions of the

main part of the questionnaire were also cross-analyzed with most of the

demographic data that emerged from the remaining 10 questions Some ofthe 19 questions were cross-analyzed with non-demographic data as well

(eg data signaling the level of strategic focus in the communication practice)

Finally where possible and appropriate some data were compared to the

results of the European Communication Monitor (ECM) and the American

Generally Accepted Practices (GAP) study

Only statistically significant results were considered (Cramerrsquos V test where

p le 005) In addition some totals may not equal 100 due to rounding

About this report

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

7Introduction

Authors

This report was written by a research team from the Institute of Marketing and

Communication Management (IMCA) of the Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

(USI) comprised of

ndash Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate Communication

ndash Tatiana Aldyukhova Teaching Assistant

ndash Ulrike Dixius Student Assistant

ndash Jost Reinhold Teaching Assistant

The team was supported by a Steering Committee comprised of the following

members

ndash Markus Berger Director SPRI amp Board Member SPRV

ndash Roman Geiser Chief Operating Officer EMEA and Chairman Switzerland

Burson-Marsteller amp President BPRA

ndash Stephan Howeg Global Head Group Communications Adecco management

and consulting SA amp Board Member HarbourClub and SPRI

ndash Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag amp President pr suisse

ndash Marion Starck President SPRI

ndash Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO Communications AG amp Board Member

BPRA and SPRI

Quotation

Lurati F Aldyukhova T Dixius U and Reinhold J (2010) Swiss CorporateCommunications and Public Relations Practice Monitor Zurich and Lugano

Swiss Corporate Communications and Public Relations Observatory

Contact person

Francesco Lurati

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

Via G Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

+41 (0)58 666 4582

francescoluratiusich

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1044

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

8

1 Demographics

11 Respondentsrsquo general profile

A total of 513 public relations and communication specialists participated in

the first Swiss Observatory Practice survey Of these respondents 356 work

in companies while the remaining 157 come from public relations agencies

and communication consultancies The survey reached all linguistic regions of

Switzerland with 752 of participants originating from the German-speaking

part [1]

A large number of company CCOs along with agency CEOs participated in thesurvey In fact 175 of all respondents are CEOs of a public relations agency or

a communication consultancy and 201 are CCOs of companies The majority

of the respondents ndash 310 ndash are company professionals with budget responsi-

bility [2]

[1] Q 27 (asked to all) In which part of Switzerland are you normally based Response items German-speaking partFrench-speaking part Italian-speaking part Rumantsch-speaking part

[2] In order to make the survey more effective it was designed for six different professional profiles (1) Agency CEO

(2) Agency Professional with budget (3) Agency Professional without budget (4) Company CCO (5) Company

Professional with budget and (6) Company Professional without budget In the current report footnotes in italics

will indicate (where applicable) which questions were asked to which profiles (numbered 1 to 6) If no specific refer-

ence to different profiles is made ldquoasked to allrdquo will signal that all six profiles were asked to answer

Language regions ()

983150 752 German

983150 216 French

983150 29 Italian

983150 02 Rumantsch

Respondentsrsquo position in the organization ()

983150 175 Agency CEO983150 82 Agency Professional with budget

983150 49 Agency Professional without budget

983150 201 Corporate CCO

983150 310 Corporate Professional with budget

983150 183 Corporate Professional without budget

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 4: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 444

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

3About

About the Swiss CorporateCommunication and Public RelationsObservatory

The Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory ndash an ini-

tiative of BPRA HarbourClub pr suisse SPRI and USI ndash generates knowledge

about the state and evolution of the communication profession in Switzerland

with the aim of supporting its development The knowledge created and dis-

seminated by the Observatory contributes to raising standards throughout the

profession honing educational and training curricula identifying research

needs and promoting the industry as a whole

Association of PR Agencies in Switzerland (BPRA)

The Association of Swiss PR Agencies (BPRA) unites the leading PR agencies in

Switzerland ndash namely those who have a proven track record in terms of size

experience and quality All BPRA agencies commit themselves to CMS II quality

certification BPRA also aims to achieve a high level of professional advisory

skills and market transparency among its members

HarbourClub

HarbourClub offers its members ndash namely chief communications officers of

Swiss organizations ndash an exclusive networking platform through which these

leading communications professionals can exchange personal experiences ad-

dress new and future challenges in corporate communications and promote

informal contacts among professional colleagues An additional goal is to pro-

fessionalize and distinguish the corporate communications function

pr suisse the Swiss Public Relations Association (SPRV)

pr suisse is a professional organization with more than 1700 members in seven

regional divisions Founded in 1954 as the Swiss Public Relations Society (SPRG)

with the scope of supporting the development of the profession as well as of

specialized educational programs the association today also administers the

federal examination board for PR professionals (Pruumlfungskommission) as well as

the professional register (Berufsregister)

Swiss Public Relations Institute (SPRI)

SPRI founded in 1969 provides undergraduate and continuing education op-

portunities for communications specialists emphasizing direct and practical

experience SPRI takes a holistic approach to the training of communicationspractitioners offering an education that is both academic and practical With

more than 8000 graduates to date SPRI conducts courses in Zurich Berne

Lausanne and Geneva Its 120 lecturers represent a wide cross section of Swiss

PR practitioners further strengthening SPRIrsquos vital link to the communications

community

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI)

The Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI) founded in 1996 comprises four fac-

ulties economics communication sciences and informatics in Lugano as well

as architecture in Mendrisio USI has a total student population of more than

2800 from 35 countries and a teaching staff of 650 professors lecturers and as-

sistants Benefiting from its unique geographic and cultural location USI is a

distinguished multilingual and multicultural university with a broad interna-

tional outlook

Swiss Public Relations Institute (SPRI)

wwwsprich

Association of PR Agencies

in Switzerland (BPRA)

wwwbprach

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI)

wwwusich

HarbourClub

wwwharbourclubch

pr suisse the Swiss Public Relations

Association (SPRV)

wwwpr-suissech

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

5Sponsors

Lead sponsors

YJOO sees communication as an interdisciplinary strategic and corporate func-

tion thus it focuses on bringing together strategy communication and design

YJOO creates enables and conducts research serving as a general contractor for

communications With branches in Zurich St Gallen and Lugano and partners

in Berne and Geneva our 27 employees provide support for both national and

international companies and organizations

We are a specialist partner for the production of electronic and print media

Depending on the requirements of our customers we can provide a complete

range of corporate publishing services as an integrated full-service provider or

specific services in collaboration with external partners Our service package

Financial Publishing is developed specially for companies both listed and un-

listed that understand the value of professional reporting We see electronic

and print media as an integrated whole Linkgrouprsquos Printlink printing center

makes it the first and unique MINERGIEreg-certified company in the Swiss graphic

arts industry Linkgroup intelligent solutions sustainable production

Supporting sponsors

Adecco

The Adecco Group is the worldrsquos leading provider of human resource solutions

With over 28000 employees and 5700 offices in more than 60 countries and

territories around the world Adecco Group offers a wide variety of services

connecting approximately 500000 colleagues with more than 100000 clients

every day

Adwired Adwired makes news and opinion markets accessible for decision makers of

leading international companies The range of services includes qualified media

monitoring media analysis and selective research in archives of more than

10000 print and social media sources as well as temporary support in emerging

issues Adwired solutions are at the leading edge of high-end media monitoring

About the sponsors of this report

l ink roup

YJOO STRATEGY COMMUNICATION DESIGN

YJOO

Strategy Communication Design

wwwyjooch

Linkgroup

Intelligent solutions sustainable production

wwwlinkgroupch

Adecco

wwwadeccoch

Adwired

wwwadwiredch

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

6 Introduction

The following four main aims formed the base for the 2010 Swiss Corporate

Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor

ndash investigate the professionrsquos practices and their evolution

ndash evaluate the integration of the communication practice

within the management practice

ndash identify trends influencing communication practice

ndash detect the needs for educational and personal development

Survey methods

The survey was administrated online from February 10 to 28 2010 Questions

were available in four languages German French Italian and English

The survey included 29 questions structured in 4 main parts (1) domain (2)

management (3) professional development and (4) demographics Respondents

required approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire

The formulation of each question was differentiated in order to take into con-

sideration the six different respondent profiles (i e agency CEO agency pro-

fessional with budget agency professional without budget company CCO

company professional with budget and company professional without budget)

Professionals from public administration non-profit organizations and or

non-governmental organizations were asked to answer questions formulated

under the company category

Sample Approximately 3500 professionals were invited to complete the questionnaire

Invitations were sent directly by the Observatory partners (SPRI SPRV BPRA

HarbourClub and USI) using their databases

The survey was also publicized on partnersrsquo websites as well as through the

main Swiss trade online portals

Ultimately 513 valid replies (approximately a 15 response rate) were ana-

lyzed

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data The 19 questions of the

main part of the questionnaire were also cross-analyzed with most of the

demographic data that emerged from the remaining 10 questions Some ofthe 19 questions were cross-analyzed with non-demographic data as well

(eg data signaling the level of strategic focus in the communication practice)

Finally where possible and appropriate some data were compared to the

results of the European Communication Monitor (ECM) and the American

Generally Accepted Practices (GAP) study

Only statistically significant results were considered (Cramerrsquos V test where

p le 005) In addition some totals may not equal 100 due to rounding

About this report

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

7Introduction

Authors

This report was written by a research team from the Institute of Marketing and

Communication Management (IMCA) of the Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

(USI) comprised of

ndash Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate Communication

ndash Tatiana Aldyukhova Teaching Assistant

ndash Ulrike Dixius Student Assistant

ndash Jost Reinhold Teaching Assistant

The team was supported by a Steering Committee comprised of the following

members

ndash Markus Berger Director SPRI amp Board Member SPRV

ndash Roman Geiser Chief Operating Officer EMEA and Chairman Switzerland

Burson-Marsteller amp President BPRA

ndash Stephan Howeg Global Head Group Communications Adecco management

and consulting SA amp Board Member HarbourClub and SPRI

ndash Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag amp President pr suisse

ndash Marion Starck President SPRI

ndash Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO Communications AG amp Board Member

BPRA and SPRI

Quotation

Lurati F Aldyukhova T Dixius U and Reinhold J (2010) Swiss CorporateCommunications and Public Relations Practice Monitor Zurich and Lugano

Swiss Corporate Communications and Public Relations Observatory

Contact person

Francesco Lurati

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

Via G Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

+41 (0)58 666 4582

francescoluratiusich

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1044

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

8

1 Demographics

11 Respondentsrsquo general profile

A total of 513 public relations and communication specialists participated in

the first Swiss Observatory Practice survey Of these respondents 356 work

in companies while the remaining 157 come from public relations agencies

and communication consultancies The survey reached all linguistic regions of

Switzerland with 752 of participants originating from the German-speaking

part [1]

A large number of company CCOs along with agency CEOs participated in thesurvey In fact 175 of all respondents are CEOs of a public relations agency or

a communication consultancy and 201 are CCOs of companies The majority

of the respondents ndash 310 ndash are company professionals with budget responsi-

bility [2]

[1] Q 27 (asked to all) In which part of Switzerland are you normally based Response items German-speaking partFrench-speaking part Italian-speaking part Rumantsch-speaking part

[2] In order to make the survey more effective it was designed for six different professional profiles (1) Agency CEO

(2) Agency Professional with budget (3) Agency Professional without budget (4) Company CCO (5) Company

Professional with budget and (6) Company Professional without budget In the current report footnotes in italics

will indicate (where applicable) which questions were asked to which profiles (numbered 1 to 6) If no specific refer-

ence to different profiles is made ldquoasked to allrdquo will signal that all six profiles were asked to answer

Language regions ()

983150 752 German

983150 216 French

983150 29 Italian

983150 02 Rumantsch

Respondentsrsquo position in the organization ()

983150 175 Agency CEO983150 82 Agency Professional with budget

983150 49 Agency Professional without budget

983150 201 Corporate CCO

983150 310 Corporate Professional with budget

983150 183 Corporate Professional without budget

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 5: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

3About

About the Swiss CorporateCommunication and Public RelationsObservatory

The Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory ndash an ini-

tiative of BPRA HarbourClub pr suisse SPRI and USI ndash generates knowledge

about the state and evolution of the communication profession in Switzerland

with the aim of supporting its development The knowledge created and dis-

seminated by the Observatory contributes to raising standards throughout the

profession honing educational and training curricula identifying research

needs and promoting the industry as a whole

Association of PR Agencies in Switzerland (BPRA)

The Association of Swiss PR Agencies (BPRA) unites the leading PR agencies in

Switzerland ndash namely those who have a proven track record in terms of size

experience and quality All BPRA agencies commit themselves to CMS II quality

certification BPRA also aims to achieve a high level of professional advisory

skills and market transparency among its members

HarbourClub

HarbourClub offers its members ndash namely chief communications officers of

Swiss organizations ndash an exclusive networking platform through which these

leading communications professionals can exchange personal experiences ad-

dress new and future challenges in corporate communications and promote

informal contacts among professional colleagues An additional goal is to pro-

fessionalize and distinguish the corporate communications function

pr suisse the Swiss Public Relations Association (SPRV)

pr suisse is a professional organization with more than 1700 members in seven

regional divisions Founded in 1954 as the Swiss Public Relations Society (SPRG)

with the scope of supporting the development of the profession as well as of

specialized educational programs the association today also administers the

federal examination board for PR professionals (Pruumlfungskommission) as well as

the professional register (Berufsregister)

Swiss Public Relations Institute (SPRI)

SPRI founded in 1969 provides undergraduate and continuing education op-

portunities for communications specialists emphasizing direct and practical

experience SPRI takes a holistic approach to the training of communicationspractitioners offering an education that is both academic and practical With

more than 8000 graduates to date SPRI conducts courses in Zurich Berne

Lausanne and Geneva Its 120 lecturers represent a wide cross section of Swiss

PR practitioners further strengthening SPRIrsquos vital link to the communications

community

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI)

The Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI) founded in 1996 comprises four fac-

ulties economics communication sciences and informatics in Lugano as well

as architecture in Mendrisio USI has a total student population of more than

2800 from 35 countries and a teaching staff of 650 professors lecturers and as-

sistants Benefiting from its unique geographic and cultural location USI is a

distinguished multilingual and multicultural university with a broad interna-

tional outlook

Swiss Public Relations Institute (SPRI)

wwwsprich

Association of PR Agencies

in Switzerland (BPRA)

wwwbprach

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana (USI)

wwwusich

HarbourClub

wwwharbourclubch

pr suisse the Swiss Public Relations

Association (SPRV)

wwwpr-suissech

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

5Sponsors

Lead sponsors

YJOO sees communication as an interdisciplinary strategic and corporate func-

tion thus it focuses on bringing together strategy communication and design

YJOO creates enables and conducts research serving as a general contractor for

communications With branches in Zurich St Gallen and Lugano and partners

in Berne and Geneva our 27 employees provide support for both national and

international companies and organizations

We are a specialist partner for the production of electronic and print media

Depending on the requirements of our customers we can provide a complete

range of corporate publishing services as an integrated full-service provider or

specific services in collaboration with external partners Our service package

Financial Publishing is developed specially for companies both listed and un-

listed that understand the value of professional reporting We see electronic

and print media as an integrated whole Linkgrouprsquos Printlink printing center

makes it the first and unique MINERGIEreg-certified company in the Swiss graphic

arts industry Linkgroup intelligent solutions sustainable production

Supporting sponsors

Adecco

The Adecco Group is the worldrsquos leading provider of human resource solutions

With over 28000 employees and 5700 offices in more than 60 countries and

territories around the world Adecco Group offers a wide variety of services

connecting approximately 500000 colleagues with more than 100000 clients

every day

Adwired Adwired makes news and opinion markets accessible for decision makers of

leading international companies The range of services includes qualified media

monitoring media analysis and selective research in archives of more than

10000 print and social media sources as well as temporary support in emerging

issues Adwired solutions are at the leading edge of high-end media monitoring

About the sponsors of this report

l ink roup

YJOO STRATEGY COMMUNICATION DESIGN

YJOO

Strategy Communication Design

wwwyjooch

Linkgroup

Intelligent solutions sustainable production

wwwlinkgroupch

Adecco

wwwadeccoch

Adwired

wwwadwiredch

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

6 Introduction

The following four main aims formed the base for the 2010 Swiss Corporate

Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor

ndash investigate the professionrsquos practices and their evolution

ndash evaluate the integration of the communication practice

within the management practice

ndash identify trends influencing communication practice

ndash detect the needs for educational and personal development

Survey methods

The survey was administrated online from February 10 to 28 2010 Questions

were available in four languages German French Italian and English

The survey included 29 questions structured in 4 main parts (1) domain (2)

management (3) professional development and (4) demographics Respondents

required approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire

The formulation of each question was differentiated in order to take into con-

sideration the six different respondent profiles (i e agency CEO agency pro-

fessional with budget agency professional without budget company CCO

company professional with budget and company professional without budget)

Professionals from public administration non-profit organizations and or

non-governmental organizations were asked to answer questions formulated

under the company category

Sample Approximately 3500 professionals were invited to complete the questionnaire

Invitations were sent directly by the Observatory partners (SPRI SPRV BPRA

HarbourClub and USI) using their databases

The survey was also publicized on partnersrsquo websites as well as through the

main Swiss trade online portals

Ultimately 513 valid replies (approximately a 15 response rate) were ana-

lyzed

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data The 19 questions of the

main part of the questionnaire were also cross-analyzed with most of the

demographic data that emerged from the remaining 10 questions Some ofthe 19 questions were cross-analyzed with non-demographic data as well

(eg data signaling the level of strategic focus in the communication practice)

Finally where possible and appropriate some data were compared to the

results of the European Communication Monitor (ECM) and the American

Generally Accepted Practices (GAP) study

Only statistically significant results were considered (Cramerrsquos V test where

p le 005) In addition some totals may not equal 100 due to rounding

About this report

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

7Introduction

Authors

This report was written by a research team from the Institute of Marketing and

Communication Management (IMCA) of the Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

(USI) comprised of

ndash Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate Communication

ndash Tatiana Aldyukhova Teaching Assistant

ndash Ulrike Dixius Student Assistant

ndash Jost Reinhold Teaching Assistant

The team was supported by a Steering Committee comprised of the following

members

ndash Markus Berger Director SPRI amp Board Member SPRV

ndash Roman Geiser Chief Operating Officer EMEA and Chairman Switzerland

Burson-Marsteller amp President BPRA

ndash Stephan Howeg Global Head Group Communications Adecco management

and consulting SA amp Board Member HarbourClub and SPRI

ndash Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag amp President pr suisse

ndash Marion Starck President SPRI

ndash Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO Communications AG amp Board Member

BPRA and SPRI

Quotation

Lurati F Aldyukhova T Dixius U and Reinhold J (2010) Swiss CorporateCommunications and Public Relations Practice Monitor Zurich and Lugano

Swiss Corporate Communications and Public Relations Observatory

Contact person

Francesco Lurati

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

Via G Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

+41 (0)58 666 4582

francescoluratiusich

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1044

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

8

1 Demographics

11 Respondentsrsquo general profile

A total of 513 public relations and communication specialists participated in

the first Swiss Observatory Practice survey Of these respondents 356 work

in companies while the remaining 157 come from public relations agencies

and communication consultancies The survey reached all linguistic regions of

Switzerland with 752 of participants originating from the German-speaking

part [1]

A large number of company CCOs along with agency CEOs participated in thesurvey In fact 175 of all respondents are CEOs of a public relations agency or

a communication consultancy and 201 are CCOs of companies The majority

of the respondents ndash 310 ndash are company professionals with budget responsi-

bility [2]

[1] Q 27 (asked to all) In which part of Switzerland are you normally based Response items German-speaking partFrench-speaking part Italian-speaking part Rumantsch-speaking part

[2] In order to make the survey more effective it was designed for six different professional profiles (1) Agency CEO

(2) Agency Professional with budget (3) Agency Professional without budget (4) Company CCO (5) Company

Professional with budget and (6) Company Professional without budget In the current report footnotes in italics

will indicate (where applicable) which questions were asked to which profiles (numbered 1 to 6) If no specific refer-

ence to different profiles is made ldquoasked to allrdquo will signal that all six profiles were asked to answer

Language regions ()

983150 752 German

983150 216 French

983150 29 Italian

983150 02 Rumantsch

Respondentsrsquo position in the organization ()

983150 175 Agency CEO983150 82 Agency Professional with budget

983150 49 Agency Professional without budget

983150 201 Corporate CCO

983150 310 Corporate Professional with budget

983150 183 Corporate Professional without budget

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 6: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

5Sponsors

Lead sponsors

YJOO sees communication as an interdisciplinary strategic and corporate func-

tion thus it focuses on bringing together strategy communication and design

YJOO creates enables and conducts research serving as a general contractor for

communications With branches in Zurich St Gallen and Lugano and partners

in Berne and Geneva our 27 employees provide support for both national and

international companies and organizations

We are a specialist partner for the production of electronic and print media

Depending on the requirements of our customers we can provide a complete

range of corporate publishing services as an integrated full-service provider or

specific services in collaboration with external partners Our service package

Financial Publishing is developed specially for companies both listed and un-

listed that understand the value of professional reporting We see electronic

and print media as an integrated whole Linkgrouprsquos Printlink printing center

makes it the first and unique MINERGIEreg-certified company in the Swiss graphic

arts industry Linkgroup intelligent solutions sustainable production

Supporting sponsors

Adecco

The Adecco Group is the worldrsquos leading provider of human resource solutions

With over 28000 employees and 5700 offices in more than 60 countries and

territories around the world Adecco Group offers a wide variety of services

connecting approximately 500000 colleagues with more than 100000 clients

every day

Adwired Adwired makes news and opinion markets accessible for decision makers of

leading international companies The range of services includes qualified media

monitoring media analysis and selective research in archives of more than

10000 print and social media sources as well as temporary support in emerging

issues Adwired solutions are at the leading edge of high-end media monitoring

About the sponsors of this report

l ink roup

YJOO STRATEGY COMMUNICATION DESIGN

YJOO

Strategy Communication Design

wwwyjooch

Linkgroup

Intelligent solutions sustainable production

wwwlinkgroupch

Adecco

wwwadeccoch

Adwired

wwwadwiredch

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

6 Introduction

The following four main aims formed the base for the 2010 Swiss Corporate

Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor

ndash investigate the professionrsquos practices and their evolution

ndash evaluate the integration of the communication practice

within the management practice

ndash identify trends influencing communication practice

ndash detect the needs for educational and personal development

Survey methods

The survey was administrated online from February 10 to 28 2010 Questions

were available in four languages German French Italian and English

The survey included 29 questions structured in 4 main parts (1) domain (2)

management (3) professional development and (4) demographics Respondents

required approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire

The formulation of each question was differentiated in order to take into con-

sideration the six different respondent profiles (i e agency CEO agency pro-

fessional with budget agency professional without budget company CCO

company professional with budget and company professional without budget)

Professionals from public administration non-profit organizations and or

non-governmental organizations were asked to answer questions formulated

under the company category

Sample Approximately 3500 professionals were invited to complete the questionnaire

Invitations were sent directly by the Observatory partners (SPRI SPRV BPRA

HarbourClub and USI) using their databases

The survey was also publicized on partnersrsquo websites as well as through the

main Swiss trade online portals

Ultimately 513 valid replies (approximately a 15 response rate) were ana-

lyzed

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data The 19 questions of the

main part of the questionnaire were also cross-analyzed with most of the

demographic data that emerged from the remaining 10 questions Some ofthe 19 questions were cross-analyzed with non-demographic data as well

(eg data signaling the level of strategic focus in the communication practice)

Finally where possible and appropriate some data were compared to the

results of the European Communication Monitor (ECM) and the American

Generally Accepted Practices (GAP) study

Only statistically significant results were considered (Cramerrsquos V test where

p le 005) In addition some totals may not equal 100 due to rounding

About this report

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

7Introduction

Authors

This report was written by a research team from the Institute of Marketing and

Communication Management (IMCA) of the Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

(USI) comprised of

ndash Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate Communication

ndash Tatiana Aldyukhova Teaching Assistant

ndash Ulrike Dixius Student Assistant

ndash Jost Reinhold Teaching Assistant

The team was supported by a Steering Committee comprised of the following

members

ndash Markus Berger Director SPRI amp Board Member SPRV

ndash Roman Geiser Chief Operating Officer EMEA and Chairman Switzerland

Burson-Marsteller amp President BPRA

ndash Stephan Howeg Global Head Group Communications Adecco management

and consulting SA amp Board Member HarbourClub and SPRI

ndash Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag amp President pr suisse

ndash Marion Starck President SPRI

ndash Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO Communications AG amp Board Member

BPRA and SPRI

Quotation

Lurati F Aldyukhova T Dixius U and Reinhold J (2010) Swiss CorporateCommunications and Public Relations Practice Monitor Zurich and Lugano

Swiss Corporate Communications and Public Relations Observatory

Contact person

Francesco Lurati

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

Via G Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

+41 (0)58 666 4582

francescoluratiusich

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1044

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

8

1 Demographics

11 Respondentsrsquo general profile

A total of 513 public relations and communication specialists participated in

the first Swiss Observatory Practice survey Of these respondents 356 work

in companies while the remaining 157 come from public relations agencies

and communication consultancies The survey reached all linguistic regions of

Switzerland with 752 of participants originating from the German-speaking

part [1]

A large number of company CCOs along with agency CEOs participated in thesurvey In fact 175 of all respondents are CEOs of a public relations agency or

a communication consultancy and 201 are CCOs of companies The majority

of the respondents ndash 310 ndash are company professionals with budget responsi-

bility [2]

[1] Q 27 (asked to all) In which part of Switzerland are you normally based Response items German-speaking partFrench-speaking part Italian-speaking part Rumantsch-speaking part

[2] In order to make the survey more effective it was designed for six different professional profiles (1) Agency CEO

(2) Agency Professional with budget (3) Agency Professional without budget (4) Company CCO (5) Company

Professional with budget and (6) Company Professional without budget In the current report footnotes in italics

will indicate (where applicable) which questions were asked to which profiles (numbered 1 to 6) If no specific refer-

ence to different profiles is made ldquoasked to allrdquo will signal that all six profiles were asked to answer

Language regions ()

983150 752 German

983150 216 French

983150 29 Italian

983150 02 Rumantsch

Respondentsrsquo position in the organization ()

983150 175 Agency CEO983150 82 Agency Professional with budget

983150 49 Agency Professional without budget

983150 201 Corporate CCO

983150 310 Corporate Professional with budget

983150 183 Corporate Professional without budget

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 7: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

5Sponsors

Lead sponsors

YJOO sees communication as an interdisciplinary strategic and corporate func-

tion thus it focuses on bringing together strategy communication and design

YJOO creates enables and conducts research serving as a general contractor for

communications With branches in Zurich St Gallen and Lugano and partners

in Berne and Geneva our 27 employees provide support for both national and

international companies and organizations

We are a specialist partner for the production of electronic and print media

Depending on the requirements of our customers we can provide a complete

range of corporate publishing services as an integrated full-service provider or

specific services in collaboration with external partners Our service package

Financial Publishing is developed specially for companies both listed and un-

listed that understand the value of professional reporting We see electronic

and print media as an integrated whole Linkgrouprsquos Printlink printing center

makes it the first and unique MINERGIEreg-certified company in the Swiss graphic

arts industry Linkgroup intelligent solutions sustainable production

Supporting sponsors

Adecco

The Adecco Group is the worldrsquos leading provider of human resource solutions

With over 28000 employees and 5700 offices in more than 60 countries and

territories around the world Adecco Group offers a wide variety of services

connecting approximately 500000 colleagues with more than 100000 clients

every day

Adwired Adwired makes news and opinion markets accessible for decision makers of

leading international companies The range of services includes qualified media

monitoring media analysis and selective research in archives of more than

10000 print and social media sources as well as temporary support in emerging

issues Adwired solutions are at the leading edge of high-end media monitoring

About the sponsors of this report

l ink roup

YJOO STRATEGY COMMUNICATION DESIGN

YJOO

Strategy Communication Design

wwwyjooch

Linkgroup

Intelligent solutions sustainable production

wwwlinkgroupch

Adecco

wwwadeccoch

Adwired

wwwadwiredch

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

6 Introduction

The following four main aims formed the base for the 2010 Swiss Corporate

Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor

ndash investigate the professionrsquos practices and their evolution

ndash evaluate the integration of the communication practice

within the management practice

ndash identify trends influencing communication practice

ndash detect the needs for educational and personal development

Survey methods

The survey was administrated online from February 10 to 28 2010 Questions

were available in four languages German French Italian and English

The survey included 29 questions structured in 4 main parts (1) domain (2)

management (3) professional development and (4) demographics Respondents

required approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire

The formulation of each question was differentiated in order to take into con-

sideration the six different respondent profiles (i e agency CEO agency pro-

fessional with budget agency professional without budget company CCO

company professional with budget and company professional without budget)

Professionals from public administration non-profit organizations and or

non-governmental organizations were asked to answer questions formulated

under the company category

Sample Approximately 3500 professionals were invited to complete the questionnaire

Invitations were sent directly by the Observatory partners (SPRI SPRV BPRA

HarbourClub and USI) using their databases

The survey was also publicized on partnersrsquo websites as well as through the

main Swiss trade online portals

Ultimately 513 valid replies (approximately a 15 response rate) were ana-

lyzed

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data The 19 questions of the

main part of the questionnaire were also cross-analyzed with most of the

demographic data that emerged from the remaining 10 questions Some ofthe 19 questions were cross-analyzed with non-demographic data as well

(eg data signaling the level of strategic focus in the communication practice)

Finally where possible and appropriate some data were compared to the

results of the European Communication Monitor (ECM) and the American

Generally Accepted Practices (GAP) study

Only statistically significant results were considered (Cramerrsquos V test where

p le 005) In addition some totals may not equal 100 due to rounding

About this report

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

7Introduction

Authors

This report was written by a research team from the Institute of Marketing and

Communication Management (IMCA) of the Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

(USI) comprised of

ndash Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate Communication

ndash Tatiana Aldyukhova Teaching Assistant

ndash Ulrike Dixius Student Assistant

ndash Jost Reinhold Teaching Assistant

The team was supported by a Steering Committee comprised of the following

members

ndash Markus Berger Director SPRI amp Board Member SPRV

ndash Roman Geiser Chief Operating Officer EMEA and Chairman Switzerland

Burson-Marsteller amp President BPRA

ndash Stephan Howeg Global Head Group Communications Adecco management

and consulting SA amp Board Member HarbourClub and SPRI

ndash Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag amp President pr suisse

ndash Marion Starck President SPRI

ndash Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO Communications AG amp Board Member

BPRA and SPRI

Quotation

Lurati F Aldyukhova T Dixius U and Reinhold J (2010) Swiss CorporateCommunications and Public Relations Practice Monitor Zurich and Lugano

Swiss Corporate Communications and Public Relations Observatory

Contact person

Francesco Lurati

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

Via G Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

+41 (0)58 666 4582

francescoluratiusich

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1044

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

8

1 Demographics

11 Respondentsrsquo general profile

A total of 513 public relations and communication specialists participated in

the first Swiss Observatory Practice survey Of these respondents 356 work

in companies while the remaining 157 come from public relations agencies

and communication consultancies The survey reached all linguistic regions of

Switzerland with 752 of participants originating from the German-speaking

part [1]

A large number of company CCOs along with agency CEOs participated in thesurvey In fact 175 of all respondents are CEOs of a public relations agency or

a communication consultancy and 201 are CCOs of companies The majority

of the respondents ndash 310 ndash are company professionals with budget responsi-

bility [2]

[1] Q 27 (asked to all) In which part of Switzerland are you normally based Response items German-speaking partFrench-speaking part Italian-speaking part Rumantsch-speaking part

[2] In order to make the survey more effective it was designed for six different professional profiles (1) Agency CEO

(2) Agency Professional with budget (3) Agency Professional without budget (4) Company CCO (5) Company

Professional with budget and (6) Company Professional without budget In the current report footnotes in italics

will indicate (where applicable) which questions were asked to which profiles (numbered 1 to 6) If no specific refer-

ence to different profiles is made ldquoasked to allrdquo will signal that all six profiles were asked to answer

Language regions ()

983150 752 German

983150 216 French

983150 29 Italian

983150 02 Rumantsch

Respondentsrsquo position in the organization ()

983150 175 Agency CEO983150 82 Agency Professional with budget

983150 49 Agency Professional without budget

983150 201 Corporate CCO

983150 310 Corporate Professional with budget

983150 183 Corporate Professional without budget

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 8: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

6 Introduction

The following four main aims formed the base for the 2010 Swiss Corporate

Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor

ndash investigate the professionrsquos practices and their evolution

ndash evaluate the integration of the communication practice

within the management practice

ndash identify trends influencing communication practice

ndash detect the needs for educational and personal development

Survey methods

The survey was administrated online from February 10 to 28 2010 Questions

were available in four languages German French Italian and English

The survey included 29 questions structured in 4 main parts (1) domain (2)

management (3) professional development and (4) demographics Respondents

required approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire

The formulation of each question was differentiated in order to take into con-

sideration the six different respondent profiles (i e agency CEO agency pro-

fessional with budget agency professional without budget company CCO

company professional with budget and company professional without budget)

Professionals from public administration non-profit organizations and or

non-governmental organizations were asked to answer questions formulated

under the company category

Sample Approximately 3500 professionals were invited to complete the questionnaire

Invitations were sent directly by the Observatory partners (SPRI SPRV BPRA

HarbourClub and USI) using their databases

The survey was also publicized on partnersrsquo websites as well as through the

main Swiss trade online portals

Ultimately 513 valid replies (approximately a 15 response rate) were ana-

lyzed

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data The 19 questions of the

main part of the questionnaire were also cross-analyzed with most of the

demographic data that emerged from the remaining 10 questions Some ofthe 19 questions were cross-analyzed with non-demographic data as well

(eg data signaling the level of strategic focus in the communication practice)

Finally where possible and appropriate some data were compared to the

results of the European Communication Monitor (ECM) and the American

Generally Accepted Practices (GAP) study

Only statistically significant results were considered (Cramerrsquos V test where

p le 005) In addition some totals may not equal 100 due to rounding

About this report

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

7Introduction

Authors

This report was written by a research team from the Institute of Marketing and

Communication Management (IMCA) of the Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

(USI) comprised of

ndash Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate Communication

ndash Tatiana Aldyukhova Teaching Assistant

ndash Ulrike Dixius Student Assistant

ndash Jost Reinhold Teaching Assistant

The team was supported by a Steering Committee comprised of the following

members

ndash Markus Berger Director SPRI amp Board Member SPRV

ndash Roman Geiser Chief Operating Officer EMEA and Chairman Switzerland

Burson-Marsteller amp President BPRA

ndash Stephan Howeg Global Head Group Communications Adecco management

and consulting SA amp Board Member HarbourClub and SPRI

ndash Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag amp President pr suisse

ndash Marion Starck President SPRI

ndash Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO Communications AG amp Board Member

BPRA and SPRI

Quotation

Lurati F Aldyukhova T Dixius U and Reinhold J (2010) Swiss CorporateCommunications and Public Relations Practice Monitor Zurich and Lugano

Swiss Corporate Communications and Public Relations Observatory

Contact person

Francesco Lurati

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

Via G Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

+41 (0)58 666 4582

francescoluratiusich

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1044

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

8

1 Demographics

11 Respondentsrsquo general profile

A total of 513 public relations and communication specialists participated in

the first Swiss Observatory Practice survey Of these respondents 356 work

in companies while the remaining 157 come from public relations agencies

and communication consultancies The survey reached all linguistic regions of

Switzerland with 752 of participants originating from the German-speaking

part [1]

A large number of company CCOs along with agency CEOs participated in thesurvey In fact 175 of all respondents are CEOs of a public relations agency or

a communication consultancy and 201 are CCOs of companies The majority

of the respondents ndash 310 ndash are company professionals with budget responsi-

bility [2]

[1] Q 27 (asked to all) In which part of Switzerland are you normally based Response items German-speaking partFrench-speaking part Italian-speaking part Rumantsch-speaking part

[2] In order to make the survey more effective it was designed for six different professional profiles (1) Agency CEO

(2) Agency Professional with budget (3) Agency Professional without budget (4) Company CCO (5) Company

Professional with budget and (6) Company Professional without budget In the current report footnotes in italics

will indicate (where applicable) which questions were asked to which profiles (numbered 1 to 6) If no specific refer-

ence to different profiles is made ldquoasked to allrdquo will signal that all six profiles were asked to answer

Language regions ()

983150 752 German

983150 216 French

983150 29 Italian

983150 02 Rumantsch

Respondentsrsquo position in the organization ()

983150 175 Agency CEO983150 82 Agency Professional with budget

983150 49 Agency Professional without budget

983150 201 Corporate CCO

983150 310 Corporate Professional with budget

983150 183 Corporate Professional without budget

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 9: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

7Introduction

Authors

This report was written by a research team from the Institute of Marketing and

Communication Management (IMCA) of the Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

(USI) comprised of

ndash Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate Communication

ndash Tatiana Aldyukhova Teaching Assistant

ndash Ulrike Dixius Student Assistant

ndash Jost Reinhold Teaching Assistant

The team was supported by a Steering Committee comprised of the following

members

ndash Markus Berger Director SPRI amp Board Member SPRV

ndash Roman Geiser Chief Operating Officer EMEA and Chairman Switzerland

Burson-Marsteller amp President BPRA

ndash Stephan Howeg Global Head Group Communications Adecco management

and consulting SA amp Board Member HarbourClub and SPRI

ndash Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag amp President pr suisse

ndash Marion Starck President SPRI

ndash Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO Communications AG amp Board Member

BPRA and SPRI

Quotation

Lurati F Aldyukhova T Dixius U and Reinhold J (2010) Swiss CorporateCommunications and Public Relations Practice Monitor Zurich and Lugano

Swiss Corporate Communications and Public Relations Observatory

Contact person

Francesco Lurati

Universitagrave della Svizzera italiana

Via G Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

+41 (0)58 666 4582

francescoluratiusich

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1044

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

8

1 Demographics

11 Respondentsrsquo general profile

A total of 513 public relations and communication specialists participated in

the first Swiss Observatory Practice survey Of these respondents 356 work

in companies while the remaining 157 come from public relations agencies

and communication consultancies The survey reached all linguistic regions of

Switzerland with 752 of participants originating from the German-speaking

part [1]

A large number of company CCOs along with agency CEOs participated in thesurvey In fact 175 of all respondents are CEOs of a public relations agency or

a communication consultancy and 201 are CCOs of companies The majority

of the respondents ndash 310 ndash are company professionals with budget responsi-

bility [2]

[1] Q 27 (asked to all) In which part of Switzerland are you normally based Response items German-speaking partFrench-speaking part Italian-speaking part Rumantsch-speaking part

[2] In order to make the survey more effective it was designed for six different professional profiles (1) Agency CEO

(2) Agency Professional with budget (3) Agency Professional without budget (4) Company CCO (5) Company

Professional with budget and (6) Company Professional without budget In the current report footnotes in italics

will indicate (where applicable) which questions were asked to which profiles (numbered 1 to 6) If no specific refer-

ence to different profiles is made ldquoasked to allrdquo will signal that all six profiles were asked to answer

Language regions ()

983150 752 German

983150 216 French

983150 29 Italian

983150 02 Rumantsch

Respondentsrsquo position in the organization ()

983150 175 Agency CEO983150 82 Agency Professional with budget

983150 49 Agency Professional without budget

983150 201 Corporate CCO

983150 310 Corporate Professional with budget

983150 183 Corporate Professional without budget

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 10: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1044

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

8

1 Demographics

11 Respondentsrsquo general profile

A total of 513 public relations and communication specialists participated in

the first Swiss Observatory Practice survey Of these respondents 356 work

in companies while the remaining 157 come from public relations agencies

and communication consultancies The survey reached all linguistic regions of

Switzerland with 752 of participants originating from the German-speaking

part [1]

A large number of company CCOs along with agency CEOs participated in thesurvey In fact 175 of all respondents are CEOs of a public relations agency or

a communication consultancy and 201 are CCOs of companies The majority

of the respondents ndash 310 ndash are company professionals with budget responsi-

bility [2]

[1] Q 27 (asked to all) In which part of Switzerland are you normally based Response items German-speaking partFrench-speaking part Italian-speaking part Rumantsch-speaking part

[2] In order to make the survey more effective it was designed for six different professional profiles (1) Agency CEO

(2) Agency Professional with budget (3) Agency Professional without budget (4) Company CCO (5) Company

Professional with budget and (6) Company Professional without budget In the current report footnotes in italics

will indicate (where applicable) which questions were asked to which profiles (numbered 1 to 6) If no specific refer-

ence to different profiles is made ldquoasked to allrdquo will signal that all six profiles were asked to answer

Language regions ()

983150 752 German

983150 216 French

983150 29 Italian

983150 02 Rumantsch

Respondentsrsquo position in the organization ()

983150 175 Agency CEO983150 82 Agency Professional with budget

983150 49 Agency Professional without budget

983150 201 Corporate CCO

983150 310 Corporate Professional with budget

983150 183 Corporate Professional without budget

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 11: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1144

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

9

Taking a closer look at the respondents working in companies most work in

Joint stock companies (303 ) followed by Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions (244 ) and Private companies (239 ) [3] Meanwhile

115 work for Nonprofit organizations or associations and 84 are employed

in other types of companies Further analysis shows that of the respondents

who chose Joint stock or Private company 351 are working in Other services

[4] such as energy and water supply construction retail and tourism while

170 belong to the Bank Insurance and Financial sector

Companies across all sectors are operating on a more international level thanagencies and consultancies According to the data the professional activity of

295 of all company respondents reaches ldquoBeyond Europerdquo but only 131 of

agency respondents fall into the same category [5] For most respondents (322 )

the overall reach of their professional activity is Switzerland

[3] Q 20a (asked to all) Where do you work Response items Joint stock company (multiple owners quoted on the

stock market) Private company (small number of owners not on the stock market) Government-owned organiza-

tion or Political institution Nonprofit organization or association Communication consultancy Public relations

agency Freelance consultant Other

[4] Q 20b (asked to all) If you work in a Joint stock company or a Private company please specify the sector Response

items Telecommunication and Media Bank Insurance Financial Sector Professional Business Services ChemicalPharmaceutical and Health Other services (consists of Energy and water supply Construction Wholesale Retail

Transportation Tourism Education Arts Entertainment and recreation and Other service activities) and Other

manufacturing (including Agriculture Food Textile Electronics Luxury goods Machinery and Other manufactur-

ing)

[5] Q 28 (asked to all) What is the reach of your professional activity (Multiple answers allowed) Response items

My language region in Switzerland All of Switzerland Europe Beyond Europe

Respondents by sectors ()

983150 158 Other manufacturing

983150 351 Other services

983150 93 Telecommunications and Media

983150 170 Bank Insurance Finance

983150 139 Professional business services

983150 89 Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health

Reach of business activities ()

All of Switzerland

My language region in Switzerland

Europe

Beyond Europe

363 Agency

303 Company

313

258

194

144

131

295

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 12: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1244

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

10

An obvious pattern stands out in the relationship among age years of experi-

ence and position seniority within the companies and agencies increases with

age Most respondents are between 35 and 45 years old (444 ) [6] and have more

than 10 years of professional experience (561) [7] Meanwhile 265 of re-

spondents have 6 to 10 years of professional experience whereas 173 have less

than 5 years of experience in the communication and public relations profes-

sion A greater percentage of people with more than 10 years of experience work

in agencies than in companies (706 vs 496 )

Approximately half of the respondents (493 ) hold a Masterrsquos (MA MSc MagMBA) or a Diploma (Lizenziat) degree [8] Compared to European professionals

(European Communication Monitor 2010 ndash ECM 2010 [9]) fewer public relations

and communication professionals in Switzerland have an academic degree

According to the data 593 of ECM respondents hold a Masterrsquos or a Diploma

degree whereas 493 in Switzerland do A similar situation exists with regard

to Doctorate and Bachelor degrees (Doctorate 73 ECM vs 49 Bachelor

269 ECM vs 96 )

[6] Q 21 (asked to all) How old are you

[7] Q 23 (asked to all) How many years of experience do you have in communication management public relations

Response items Fewer than 5 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years[8] Q 24 (asked to all) Please state the highest educational qualification you hold Response items No qualification

Eidg Dipl Federal Certificate (eidg Fachausweis Brevet federal attestato professionale federale) Bachelor (BA)

Master (MA MSc Mag MBA) Diploma (Lizenziat) or Doctorate (PhD Dr)

[9] Zerfass A Tench R Verhoeven P Vercic D amp Moreno A (2010) European Communication Monitor 2010 Status

Quo and Challenges for Communication Management in Europe ndash Results of an Empirical Survey in 46 countries

Brussels EACD EUPRERA

Age of the respondents ()

983150 102 Up to 30

983150 180 30ndash35 years

983150 211 35ndash40 years

983150 233 40ndash45 years

983150 145 45ndash50 years

983150 67 50ndash55 years

983150 37 55ndash60 years

983150 25 60 and up

Educational qualification ()

Doctorate

Master DiplomaBachelor (BA)

Federal Certificate

Eidg Diploma

No qualification

49

493 96

203

136

23

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 13: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1344

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

11

Respondents were asked specifically about their communication qualifications

The results indicate that 335 obtained their communication qualification in

an academic communication program [10] The proportion of respondents with

a PR-F PR-B or CAS in agencies and companies differs significantly Whereas

295 of company respondents hold a PR-F 188 in agencies do A similar situ-

ation applies for CAS 204 for companies and 125 for agencies However

PR-B is more popular for agencies than companies (35 and 17 respectively)

12 A highly networked profession

Almost 70 of the Swiss public relations and communication professionals are

members of a national or international professional organization Most re-

spondents have an affiliation with pr suisse (548 ) [11] In general more agency

than company respondents are members of a professional organization (eg pr

suisse 663 vs 496 )

[10] Q 25 (asked to all) Please state the communication qualifications you hold Response items PR-F PR-B CAS (Certifi-

cate of Advanced Studies) in communication Professional certificate in another communication discipline Aca-

demic degree in communication (Bachelor Master Doctorate)

[11] Q 26 (asked to all) Are you a member of a professional organization For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoMember of a professional organizationrdquo

Communication qualification ()

Academic degree

in communication

PR-F

PR-B

CAS in communication

Professional certificate in another

communication discipline

335

261

226

179

158

Member of a professional organization ()

pr suisse

BPRA

HarbourClubSCIK ASCI

SPAG SSPA

Other national

Other international

548

53

43 43

43

111

43

Markus Berger eidg dipl PR-Berater

BR SPRV Director SPRI ldquoNetworks are thekey to making a professional difference

Over half of Switzerlandrsquos PR profes-

sionals are actively involved in social net-

works However the fact that 70 of

all PR professionals also belong to a pro-

fessional organization shows that vir-

tual networking platforms do not replace

face-to-face interaction and that the in-

terpersonal exchange of ideas is still high-

ly valued It is for precisely this reason

that the Swiss Public Relations House came

into being as a powerhouse and service

center for the entire industry enabling

the industry organizations to serve their

members better while further increasing

PR professionalism in Switzerlandrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 14: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

12

Furthermore agency and communication consultants navigate social networks

for their personal use more than professionals from companies (856 vs 802 )

[12] Xing is the top-ranked social network used by most respondents (556 in

agencies and 442 in companies) to communicate their professional profile

while LinkedIn ranks second with 350 for agencies and 283 for companies

As expected ASMALLWORLD and MySpace are at the bottom of the list account-

ing for only 06 and 11 of all respondents

For personal use most respondents give preference to Facebook 619 of agen-

cy respondents and 521 of company respondents Twitter follows with 156

and 125 respectively for agency and company respondents ASMALLWORLD

(total of 27 ) MySpace (total of 23 ) and Plaxo (total of 19 ) do not exceed 5

[12] Q 29a (asked to all) Do you use social networks Q 29b If ldquoyesrdquo which of these social networks are you a member

of Categories With my professional profile with my private profile For the possible response options see the

chart ldquoSocial media usage with professional profilerdquo

Social media usage with professional profile ()

Xing

LinkedIn

Facebook

Twitter

Plaxo

ASMALLWORLD

MySpace

556 Agency

442 Company

350

283

200

125

138

48

81

42

13

03

06

11

Social media usage with private profile ()

Facebook

Twitter

Xing

LinkedIn

Plaxo

MySpace

ASMALLWORLD

619 Agency

521 Company

156

125

138

96

69

88

13

23

13

28

13

34

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 15: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1544

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

13

13 Gender women outnumber men but do not yet outpower them

The data indicate that 587 of the respondents are women This proportion is

greater in companies where women account for 642 of respondents The fe-

male-to-male ratio in agencies is almost 11 with 527 men and 473 women

The Swiss situation is very similar to the European one where the overall pro-

portion of women working in communication and public relations is 558 (or

29 percentage points lower than in Switzerland) [13]

The number of women working in public relations and communication posi-

tions in the following types of company is almost double the number of men

Nonprofit (634 female vs 366 male) Government-owned organizations orPolitical institutions (644 female vs 356 male) and Private (647 female

vs 353 male) organizations while men outnumber women only in communi-

cation consultancies and public relations agencies where they account for

562 of the workforce

[13] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 19 What is your gender

Male

413Female

587

Gender in types of company ()

Freelance consultant

Other

Private company

Government-owned organizations

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization

Joint stock company

Communication consultancy

Public relations agency

267 Male

733 Female

281

719

353

647

356

644

366

634

426

574

562

438

Suzanne Rouden-Schmidlin Rouden amp

Partners and President of the Federal

examination board for PR professionals

Pruumlfungskommission pr suisse ldquoThe Swiss

PR scene is clearly dominated by women in

terms of sheer numbers We have seen

this trend quite clearly in the past several

years among students working toward

both the PR Consultant Diploma and

PR Professional Certificate However lead-

ing positions in communication and PR ndash

particularly in consultancies and agencies

ndash are primarily occupied by men Thusa discrepancy exists between educated PR

specialists and professional reality As

the examination body for pr suisse we are

particularly interested in this situation

and are watching its further development

with interestrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 16: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1644

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

14

When looking at the distributions of females and males by sector in several sec-

tors the number of women is almost double the number of men The Chemical

Pharmaceutical and Health sector is made up of 609 of women vs 391 of

men The Other services sector employs 659 of women and 341 of men

while the Other manufacturing sector also engages 659 women and 341

men The proportion changes in Telecommunications and Media where men

account for 542 of employees and in Professional business services where

528 of employees are men

When looking at the positions held by respondents across all companies wom-

en do not yet outpower men in all areas In fact CEO positions in agencies and

consultancies are still primarily occupied by men (622 men vs 378 women)

Furthermore although 524 of the company CCOs who responded are women

their strategic role remains limited In fact when it comes to strategic decision-

making more men claim to feel involved in a significant way For instance

506 of men claim to be significantly involved in ldquoCorporate governancerdquo deci-

sions compared to only 332 of women [14] In addition in corporate brand

activities male respondents claim to be more frequently ldquoIn chargerdquo when it

comes to the definition of ldquoCorporate brand values and brand purposerdquo (316

male vs 213 female) [15]

The number of women will increase in the future In fact the profession con-

sists of more young women under 40 than men (698 vs 302 ) Thus within

the next several years the distribution among genders based on the level of ex-

perience may change reducing the advantage that men have (today 708 of all

male respondents have more than 10 years of experience while only 458 of

female respondents show the same length of experience) and raising the chance

that womenrsquos strategic role will increase

[14] See Data Q 1 chapter 41 (Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions con-

cerning the following business aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients

involve you in the decision-making efforts concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much

does not apply) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in busi-

ness aspectsrdquo[15] See Data Q 4 chapter 42 (Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate

brand activities (Agency) In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following

corporate brand activities Response items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and

principles) and brand purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate

visual identity systems (i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for companies Leading role Sup-

porting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved)

Gender in sectors ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Professional business services

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Other services

Other manufacuring

391 Male

609 Female

528

472

409

591

542

458

341

659

341

659

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 17: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

15Industry trends

2 Industry trends

Digital communication significantly outstripping all other trends

Four trends affecting communication activities are seen as the most important

ones The biggest trend mentioned by almost half of the respondents (489 ) is

the ldquoIncreased effect of digital communicationrdquo ldquoConstant change of organiza-

tional settings both externally and internallyrdquo (322 ) ldquoFaster escalation of is-

suesrdquo (304 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo (273 )

are the remaining three most commonly picked trends influencing the profes-

sion [1]

[1] Q 9 (asked to all) Which of the following trends are affecting your activity the most (Pick 3) For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoTrends affecting the industryrdquo

Trends affecting the industry ()

Increased effect

of digital communication

Constant change of organizational

settings both externally

and internally

Faster escalation of issues

Increased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholders

Increased competition for areasof responsibility and for

budget inside the organization

Globalization of communication

Concentration process

in the media market

Shorter products

and services life cycle

Increased expectation

for social responsibility

Increased request for research

and measurement

Increased fragmentation

of stakeholders

Talent battle increased turnover

and compensation expectations

489 Overall

500 Agency

462 Company

322

250

354

304

238

334

273

206

303

203206

201

193

169

204

185

319

125

185

231

164

172

144

184164

194

150

156

163

153

84

75

88

Matthias Graf Chief Communications

Officer Ringier AG ldquoAlthough a few years

ago digital communication was only

a trend today organizations who have

failed to implement a certain level of

digitization are falling behind and the

gap is growing ever wider The phe-

nomenon is ubiquitous the top four in-

dustry trends shown by the Observatory

Survey are all linked to the increasing

speed of digitization The Internet fosters

innovation New models of interaction

are exploding onto the scene increasingthe complexity of organizational behavior

This intensifies the degree of direct com-

munication and participation between

companies and stakeholders demanding

a new level of stakeholder management

As practically no control exists over online

discussions there is a further need for

companies to significantly step up their

issues management to become very pro-

active It is high time for communication

professionals to get themselves and their

organizations fit for the era of digital

communication ndash in all aspectsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 18: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

16 Industry trends

ldquoEffect of digital communicationrdquo is seen almost equally by agencies and com-

panies as the main trend affecting their activity (500 and 462 respectively)

Meanwhile company respondents more often cited the ldquoConstant change of or-

ganizational settings both externally and internallyrdquo (354 vs 250 ) the

ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo (334 vs 238 ) and ldquoIncreased scrutiny and pres-

sure from stakeholdersrdquo (303 vs 206 ) as trends affecting their activity On

the other hand agency representatives were more likely to consider the ldquoCon-

centration process in the media marketrdquo as the second most important trend

(319 vs 125 )

Looking more closely by type of company respondents of Nonprofit organiza-

tions mention a higher importance of the ldquoIncreased fragmentation of stake-

holdersrdquo (137 percentage points more) than all other companies Joint stock and

Government-owned organizations or Political institutions are more often af-

fected by a ldquoFaster escalation of issuesrdquo than the average (+103 and +11 percent-

age points respectively)

The results show that the trends influence what the profession does and what

future issues will be Trends may also help us in providing explanations for the

results that emerge in respondentsrsquo answers to the other survey questions For

instance the highest ranked trend (i e ldquoIncreased effect of digital communica-

tionrdquo) is reflected in the increased usage of digital media for communication

and public relations [2] Another example is evident when comparing communi-cation disciplines The discipline ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo is predicted to increase

in the future [3] which fits with the high-ranked trend of ldquoIncreased scrutiny

and pressure from stakeholdersrdquo A third example is the low-ranked item ldquoIn-

creased request for research and measurementrdquo (164 ) which corresponds

with the fact that the measurement of communication activities is still to a cer-

tain extent carried out in a traditional way (i e output measurement) [4]

[2] See Data Q 7 chapter 32 (Q 7 [asked to 1 2 4 and 5] (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communica-

tion (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in

producing this type of communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about

the relevance of digital communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough esti-

mate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you

think this will be in 3 years (Percentage of time)

[3] See Data Q 3 chapter 33 (Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes sev-eral disciplines How important are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency)

today How important will they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points consid-

ered 4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo)

[4] See Data Q13 chapter 6 (Q 13 [asked to all] Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of

public relations communication management (1 = not at all 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the

possible response options see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo)

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 19: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 1944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

17The Practice of Corporate Communication

3 The Practice of CorporateCommunication

Corporate communication and public relations include several disciplines that

span from institutional communication to crisis communication Communica-

tion professionals enact the different disciplines by implementing organiza-

tional actions that can go from contributing to the design of new products or

services to influencing corporate governance Of course they can also act by

implementing communicational activities (for instance by defining corporate

brand values and brand purposes or by managing philanthropic activities)

Their actions are formally communicated through four main categories of chan-

nels interpersonal organizational media news media and advertising and pro-

motional channels The following sections will present data referring to this

conceptual framework

Disciplines

ndash Institutional communication

ndash Issue communication

ndash Internal communication

ndash Financial comm amp investor relations

ndash Public affairs

ndash Community relations

ndash Crisis communication

Activities (ldquoactionsrdquo) Channels (ldquomediardquo)

Organizationalndash New products and services

ndash New markets

ndash Strategic alliancesndash Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

ndash Organizational changes

ndash Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

ndash Corporate governance

Communicationalndash Corporate brand value

and brand purpose

ndash Corporate visual identity

ndash Partnership alliances and coalitions

with relevant stakeholders

ndash Sponsorship

ndash Philanthropy

ndash Interpersonal communication

ndash Organizational media

ndash News media

ndash Advertising and promotional

media

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 20: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

18 The Practice of Corporate Communication

31 Communication channels are all equally important

Communication professionals make almost an equal usage of the four main

communication channels in their activities The more marketing-related chan-

nel ldquoAdvertising and promotional mediardquo is used by 182 making it less impor-

tant than the remaining three categories ldquoOrganizational mediardquo (291)

ldquoNews mediardquo (276 ) and ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo (252 ) In addition

no significant changes are predicted for the future use of the four different

channels except for ldquoInterpersonal communicationrdquo which ndash with a small 25

increase ndash will become more relevant in the next three years [1]

32 Digital communication from a ldquotry-it-allrdquo to a more focusedapproach

Communication professionals spend approximately one quarter of their time

producing and managing digital media (24 ) This usage will increase in the

next three years (up to 38 ) [2]

[1] Q 6 (asked to all) (Company) Public relations Corporate communication functions communicate through four chan-

nel categories What is the relative importance of these channels in your organization today What will the relative

importance of these channels be in your organization in 3 years (Agency) Public relations Corporate communica-

tion functions communicate through four channel categories Regarding the work done for your clients what is the

relative importance of these channels today Regarding the work done for your clients what will the relative

importance of these channels be in 3 years (Divide 100 points among the four channel categories) Response

items Interpersonal communication Organizational media News media Advertising and promotional media[2] Q 7 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) Think about the relevance of digital communication (both internal and

external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time you spend in producing this type of

communication today How much do you think this will be in 3 years (Agency) Think about the relevance of digital

communication (both internal and external) in your activity Please provide a rough estimate of the relative time

you spend in producing this type of communication for your clients How much do you think this will be in 3 years

(Percentage of time)

Importance of communication channels ()

983150 252 Interpersonal communication

983150 291 Organizational media

983150 276 News media

983150 182 Advertising and promotional media

Today

24In 3 years

38

Satoshi J Sugimoto Deputy Head Public

Relations Switzerland Novartis Interna-

tional AG and Board Member pr suisse

ldquoSocial media presents great opportunities

for the healthcare industry Patients and

healthcare practitioners are increasingly

making decisions based on healthcare

information online from blogs and in on-

line communities Based on this trend

the healthcare industry needs to continue

to use social media in a responsibleway better understanding and meeting

the needs of patients and other key

stakeholder groupsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 21: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

19The Practice of Corporate Communication

Even today companies operating worldwide view digital media as more relevant

than companies working mainly in Switzerland They spend 28 of their time

in producing and managing digital media (compared to companies working

mainly in Switzerland which spend only 22 of their time)

When looking at the types of digital media ldquoSocial networksrdquo (380 ) are the

most popular followed by ldquoOnline videosrdquo (330 ) Other digital communica-

tion tools are still in an initial try-out phase However the 12-month prediction

shows that a more focused usage of digital media may emerge particularly in

regard to ldquoSocial networksrdquo ldquoOnline videosrdquo and ldquoSpecial interest communi-

tiesrdquo (an increase from 207 to 390 )

In addition 250 of the respondents claim that they are still not using digital

media at all today this proportion increases to 364 for companies operating

only in Switzerland

The usage of digital media changes with the type of company and geographical

reach of the companyrsquos activities

ldquoSocial networksrdquo are more often used by Private companies (412 ) Nonprofit

organizations (415 ) and Consultancies (546 ) and less often used by Govern-

ment-owned organizations or Political institutions (253 ) and Joint stock com-

panies (278 ) Joint stock companies are heavy users of ldquoOnline videosrdquo (463

compared to the average of 330 ) whereas Government-owned organizations or

Political institutions seem to prefer ldquoBlogsrdquo more so than others (264 com-

pared to the average of 209 )

Usage of digital media ()

Social networks

Online videos

Blogs

Special-interest communities

RSS feeds

Content sharing

Wikis

Podcast

Microblogs

Virtual worlds

None

380 Today

505 In 12 months

330

363

209

242207

390

166

168

158

209

136

128

135

140

68

173

06

19250

105

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 22: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

20 The Practice of Corporate Communication

International companies with a worldwide or European-wide reach use more

digital media than companies operating mainly in Switzerland or in their own

region However locally focused companies are forecasting a greater increase in

digital media usage in the next 12 months for instance regional companies

foresee a 63 percentage point increase in ldquoBlogsrdquo while European-wide compa-

nies predict only an increase of 09 percentage points

33 Communication disciplines the growing importanceof community relations and internal communication

ldquoIssues communicationrdquo and ldquoInstitutional communicationrdquo (77 and 727

respectively) are seen as the most important communication disciplines by all

respondents and their importance seems expected to grow in the future How-

ever the highest future growth is expected in ldquoInternal communicationrdquo (+179

percentage points) and ldquoCommunity relationsrdquo (+178 percentage points) [3]

With the exception of Joint stock companies (583 ) on average companies con-

sider ldquoFinancial communication and Investor relationsrdquo to be the least impor-

tant discipline (292 ) However this discipline is expected to increase in the

next three years

The relevance of ldquoInternal communicationrdquo is particularly expected to increase

among Nonprofit and Government-owned organizations or Political institu-

tions In fact 707 of the Nonprofit organizations and 712 of Government-

owned organizations or Political institutions foresee a relevant increase in im-

portance of this discipline (whereas currently only 300 and 330

respectively consider it important)

[3] Q 3 (asked to all) The public relations corporate communication function includes several disciplines How impor-

tant are these disciplines in your organization consulting activity (if you are an agency) today How important will

they be in 3 years (1 = not at all 5 = very much ldquodoes not applyrdquo) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible

response options see the chart ldquoCommunication disciplinesrdquo

Communication disciplines ()

Issues communication

Institutional communication

Internal communication

Public affairs

Crisis communication

Community relations

Financial communication amp

investor relations

770 Today

823 In 3 years

727

804

513

692

464

569

446

550

427

605

292

418

Gaby Tschofen VP Corporate Communi-

cations amp CSR Barry Callebaut AG

ldquoUnfortunately the distrust many people

have toward politicians and the stateas well as the business world and its lead-

ers has reached an all-time high Great

uncertainty exists as people are preoccu-

pied by questions such as what will the

future of the economy bring what does

the shift of geopolitical power mean

how safe is my job how secure is my pen-

sion etc In a climate of such distrust

and uncertainty there is an increased need

for explanations for better orientation

as well as a growing expectation for com-

panies to engage in the communities

in which they work ndash not least because ofthe ever-decreasing confidence in a high-

ly indebted state Careful attention to

internal and community relations on the

part of companies and institutions alike

will undoubtedly become an increasingly

important prerequisite for their successrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 23: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

21The Practice of Corporate Communication

34 Communicators play a limited role in stakeholder partnershipssponsorship and philanthropy

Less than one quarter of the respondents claim to be involved in the above com-

munication areas with only 205 stating that they are ldquoIn chargerdquo or have a

ldquoLeading rolerdquo in ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stake-

holdersrdquo 259 claim to have this level of involvement in ldquoSponsorshiprdquo while

in ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo the figure is just 154 [4]

Across all three communication activities the predominant response falls on

the ldquoInvolved supporting rolerdquo option The involvement is greater for activities

in the area of ldquoPartnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo

than for ldquoSponsorshiprdquo and ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo

[4] Q 5 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following activities (Agency) In your consult-

ing activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following activities Response items ldquoPartnerships

alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo ldquoSponsorshiprdquo ldquoPhilanthropyrdquo Scale points for companies

Leading role Supporting role Not involved Scale points for agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Partnerships alliances and coalitions with relevant stakeholders ()

983150 205 In charge

983150 587 Involved

983150 175 Not involved

983150 33 Does not apply

Sponsorship ()

983150 259 In charge

983150 450 Involved

983150 207 Not involved

983150 84 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 24: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

22 The Practice of Corporate Communication

Looking at the data in more detail more agency than company respondents are

ldquoIn chargerdquo when it comes to activities such as ldquoPartnership alliances and coa-

litions with relevant stakeholdersrdquo (300 vs 161) In regard to the other two

activities ndash i e Sponsorship (295 vs 181) and Philanthropy (195 vs 63 )

ndash company respondents show a higher level of being ldquoIn chargerdquo than agency

respondents

Philanthropy ()

983150 154 In charge

983150 437 Involved

983150 265 Not involved

983150 144 Does not apply

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 25: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2544

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

23Strategy

4 Strategy

41 One third of all communication managers feel involvedin business decisions

On average 376 of respondents feel significantly involved in specific busi-

ness decisions ldquoOrganizational changesrdquo refer to the business aspect in which

more professionals (467 ) feel involved in the decision-making process The

business area in which the lowest number of respondents (210 ) feels in-

volved is ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo [1]

Agency professionals (293 ) feel less involved in business decisions than com-

pany professionals (418 ) particularly for decisions concerning ldquoOrganization-

al changesrdquo (341 vs 531) ldquoCorporate social responsibilityrdquo (333 vs 512 )

ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo (288 vs 446 ) ldquoCorporate governancerdquo (295 vs 427 )

and ldquoMergers and acquisitionsrdquo (135 vs 249 )

In companies the strategic role is concentrated at the CCO level In fact the

proportion of CCOs who feel that they play a role in most business decisions

(with the exception of two items ldquoStrategic alliancesrdquo and ldquoOrganizational

changesrdquo) is clearly higher than the proportion of professionals with budget On

average 502 of the CCOs are involved in business decisions whereas 363 of

professionals with budget are

[1] Q 1 (asked to 1 2 4 and 5) (Company) How much do you feel involved in decisions concerning the following busi-

ness aspects (Agency) In your consulting activity how much do you feel your clients involve you in decision-making

concerning the following business aspects (1 = not at all 5 = very much does not apply) Scale points considered

4ndash5 For the possible response options see the chart ldquoInvolvement in business aspectsrdquo

Involvement in business aspects ()

Organizational changes

Corporate social responsibility

New products and services

Strategic alliances

Corporate governance

New markets

Mergers and acquisitions (MampA)

467 Overall

531 Company

341 Agency

451

512

333

409

431

363

394

446

288

383

427

295

317

328

296

210

249

136

Francesco Lurati Professor of Corporate

Communication Universitagrave della Svizzera

italiana and Board Member SPRI ldquoHelping

design a companyrsquos strategy is the real

strategic contribution to which communi-

cation professionals should aspire Help-

ing implement the strategy ndash although an

important part of the job ndash is not enough

It confines communication to the tactical

level and constitutes a missed opportunity

to maximize the strategy quality Commu-

nication professionals should help compa-

nies make strategic decisions by consider-ing their compatibility with the companyrsquos

culture and identity its reputation and

the quality of its stakeholder relation-

ships Corporate branding should be the

port of entry for such contributions In

this regard Swiss communication profes-

sionals have room to improve their strate-

gic impactrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 26: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2644

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

24 Strategy

42 Communication professionals are partially in chargeof corporate branding

In the definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose only one quarter

(255 ) of respondents declare themselves to be ldquoIn chargerdquo For the develop-

ment of the corporate visual identity systems the percentage is higher 353 [2]

As expected professionals in top positions are ldquoIn chargerdquo more so than their

colleagues who occupy lower echelons The results indicate that 466 of theCCOs claim to be ldquoIn chargerdquo of the definition of corporate brand values and

brand purpose while only 201 of the Professionals with budget responsibili-

ties and 74 of the Professionals without budget responsibilities do For devel-

opment of the corporate visual identity systems 641 of the CCOs claim to be

ldquoIn chargerdquo while 327 of the Professionals with budget and 96 of the Pro-

fessionals without budget responsibilities do

[2] Q 4 (asked to all) (Company) To which extent are you involved in the following corporate brand activities (Agency)

In your consulting activity are you involved in helping your clients with the following corporate brand activities

Response Items Definition of corporate brand values (organizationrsquos guiding values and principles) and brand

purpose (organizationrsquos ldquofundamental reason for beingrdquo) Development of the corporate visual identity systems

(i e logos colors typographies images etc) Scale points for Companies Leading role Supporting role Not

involved Scale points for Agencies In charge Involved Not involved

Definition of corporate brand values and brand purpose ()

983150 255 In charge Leading role

983150 569 Involved Supporting role

983150 175 Not involved

Development of the corporate visual identity systems ()

983150 353 In charge Leading role

983150 423 Involved Supporting role

983150 224 Not involved

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 27: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

25Strategy

Furthermore a distinct difference exists between agency CEOs and company

CCOs the latter being more involved in the definition of corporate brand values

and purpose (466 vs 278 for CEOs) The dissimilarity is even stronger when

it comes to development of the corporate visual identity systems with 641 of

CCOs vs 333 of CEOs claiming to be ldquoIn chargerdquo

43 Interfunctional collaboration surprising gap betweenCommunication and HR

CCOs and corporate communication professionals with budget responsibilities

declare that they have different levels of proximity than other corporate depart-

ments and functions [3]

The results indicate that 676 claim to work closely with the ldquoCEOrdquo Further-

more 607 signal that they work closely with the ldquoMarketing departmentrdquo

half declare that they collaborate very closely However the level of proximity

with other functions is quite low only approximately 20 of respondents claim

to have a close relationship with them Such results are somewhat surprising

when it comes to the relationship with the ldquoHRrdquo function (237 ) particularly if

the increasing importance of internal communication is considered

[3] Q 12 (asked to 4 and 5) How closely do you work with the CEO Marketing department (including Brand and Sales

managers) HR department Finance department Legal department Board of Directors Scale a graphical repre-

sentation of the scale was used for this question (see the table ldquoInterfunctional collaborationrdquo) All levels of close-

ness were considered

CEO

Marketing

HR

Finance

Legal

Board of

Directors

COM Other

1 27 65 134 137 240 282

2 38 31 187 225 195 225

3 260 298 443 420 363 298

4 569 313 176 176 172 156

5 107 294 61 42 31 38

+ 676 607 237 218 203 194

Interfunctional collaboration

4 5

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 28: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2844

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 29: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 2944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

27Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

5 Relationship between Commu-nication and Marketing Functions

51 Varying levels of integration between Corporate Communicationand Marketing

Corporate communication and public relations professionals engage in commu-

nication activities for both ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo and ldquoMarketing-related

topicsrdquo Three fifths of their efforts are spent on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo

while two fifths are focused on ldquoMarketing-related topicsrdquo [1] No significant dif-

ference exists between respondents working in agencies and those employed in

companies

As expected when looking at the data according to the type of company more

overlapping occurs in Private companies where professionals cover ldquoCorporate-

relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics in almost the same proportion Mean-

while in Government-owned organizations or Political institutions Nonprofit

organizations and Joint stock companies communication professionals are

more specialized in corporate communication

[1] Q 2 (asked to all) (Company) How much of your communication activity goes into covering corporate-related and

marketing-related topics (Agency) In your consulting practice how much of your communication activity goes into

covering corporate-related and marketing-related topics for your clients (Divide 100 points among the two

topics) Response items Corporate-related topics Marketing-related topics

Communication activity in Marketing-related and Corporate-related topics ()

983150 614 Corporate-related topics

983150 386 Marketing-related topics

Communication and Marketing relationship by the type of company ()

Government-owned organization

or Political institution

Nonprofit organization orassociation

Joint stock company

Others

Communication consultancy Public

relations agency

Freelance consultant

Private company

687 Corporate-related topics

313 Marketing-related topics

665335

643

357

617

383

601

399

552

448

521

479

Dominique Morel Partner Head of

Marketing amp Communications KPMG

ldquoVolatile markets and increased competi-

tion demand early awareness of changes

in the environment more flexible busi-

ness planning and quick responses to cul-

tivate business opportunities To achieve

the right tempo ldquocorporate-relatedrdquo and

ldquomarketing-relatedrdquo topics must be given

equal weight The framework of a uni-

versal sales process guarantees that Mar-

keting amp Communications together with

other business units can efficiently sup-port sales both internally and externally

The major challenge in seamless collabo-

ration is to unify the long-term cultivation

of the firmrsquos image with the sales objec-

tives The brand as a mirror of the organi-

zationrsquos positioning that is also synony-

mous with its reputation is the point of

reference for entrepreneurial and com-

mercial decisionsrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 30: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

28 Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Relevant differences are evident among the sectors Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health as well as Banking Insurance and Financial sectors have the greatest

communication effort focusing on ldquoCorporate-related topicsrdquo The Telecommuni-

cations and Media sector is closer to the overall average whereas other sectors

more equally allocate between ldquoCorporate-relatedrdquo and ldquoMarketing-relatedrdquo topics

52 Communication and Marketing two independentbut coordinated functions

The largest section of the respondents (416 ) perceive that the two functions

are independent but coordinated (see next table for model 2) For these respond-

ents communication and marketing are integrated functions that ndash although

overlapping ndash still maintain their autonomy As model 3 indicates 111 report

a marketing-driven communication department while 187 (see model 4) signal

that the communication department leads the marketing function In addition

107 (see model 5) of the respondents declare that in their case equating the

marketing department and communication department best corresponds to the

circumstances of their company [2]

[2] Q 11 (asked to 4 and 5) Which of the following diagrams most clearly corresponds to the circumstances of your

company (Pick 1 diagram only) For the possible response options see the chart ldquoMarketing and Communication

interrelationrdquo

Communication and Marketing relationship by sector ()

Chemical Pharmaceutical

and Health

Bank Insurance Financial

Telecommunications and Media

Professional business services

Other services

Other manufacturing

709 Corporate-related topics

291 Marketing-related topics

680

321602

398

561

439

559

441

550

450

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 31: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

29Relationship between Communication and Marketing Functions

Marketing and Communication interrelation

Organizational model 1 2 3 4 5 6

Does not

apply

Average 99 416 111 187 107 80

Chemical Pharmaceutical Health 263 474 53 105 00 105

Bank Insurance Financial 360 520 40 40 40 00

Telecommunications and Media 125 313 375 00 187 00

Com

Mktg

Mktg

Com

Com

Mktg

Com

MktgCom + Mktg

The prevailing organizational model (i e independent but coordinated commu-

nication and marketing functions) depicted in model 2 is even more dominant

among Joint stock companies (542 ) Looking at the sectors this model is more

predominantly adopted by companies in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and

Health sector (474 ) as well as in Banking Insurance and Financial (520 ) sec-

tors Furthermore a relevant proportion of companies belonging to these two

sectors seem to prefer an even stronger specialization between the two functions

favoring an organizational model with clear independence between marketing

and communication This is the case for 263 of the respondents belonging to

the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector as well as for 360 of the re-spondents belonging to the Banking Insurance and Financial sector Interest-

ingly companies belonging to the Telecommunication and Media sector set

themselves apart from the other Joint stock companies by favoring a marketing-

driven model (see model 3) Finally 438 of companies belonging to the Non-

profit organizations or associations point out that the communication function

leads the marketing function (see model 4) [3]

[3] These results mostly confirm what has been predicted by theory See Hutton JG (1996) ldquoIntegrated Marketing

Communications and the Evolution of Marketing Thoughtrdquo Journal of Business Research 37 3 155ndash162

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 32: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

30 Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

The results indicate that 815 of the respondents assess communication effec-

tiveness through ldquoClippings and media responserdquo [1] This result is in line with

that of the 2010 ECM survey [2] which also reported that this item is most often

picked (823 ) The second highest measured activity is ldquoInternet intranet us-

agerdquo (588 ) A relatively equal amount (464 ) of respondents monitors ldquoUnder-

standing of the key messagesrdquo and ldquoFinancial costs for projectsrdquo

All these items can be grouped into five stages (levels) of evaluation ldquoPrepara-

tionrdquo ldquoOutputrdquo ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo and ldquoImpact

on businessrdquo [3] Still 702 of the respondents focus on the ldquoOutputrdquo Less than

half (464 ) consider their ldquoImpact on stakeholdersrdquo 369 measure the ldquoEffect

on stakeholdersrdquo and only 281 focus on ldquoImpact on businessrdquo when assessing

their effectiveness of communication management

[1] Q 13 (asked to all) Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations commu-

nication management (1 = not at a ll 5 = very much) Scale points considered 4ndash5 For the possible response options

see the chart ldquoMeasurement of communication effectivenessrdquo[2] Zerfass A et al (2010) European Communication Monitor (ECM) Q 10 Which items do you monitor or measure to

assess the effectiveness of public relations communication management (1 = do not use at all 5 = use continu-

ously) methods used = scale points 4ndash5

[3] Cutlip SM Center AH Broom GM (2000) Effective Public Relations Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall pp

436ndash452 and Lindenmann WK (2001) Public Relations Research For Planning and Evaluation University of Florida

Gainesville The Institute for Public Relations

Measurement of communication effectiveness ()

Clippings and media response

Internet intranet usage

Unterstanding of key messages

Financial costs for projects

Stakeholder attitudes and

behavior change

Media production cost

Reputation index brand value

Business goals (i e with scorecards)

Process quality (internal workflow)

Personnel costs for projects

815

588

464

464

436

328

300

280

279

240

6 Measuring the effectiveness ofcommunication looking beyondoutput

Patrick Schuumlrmann Managing Director

Adwired Communications AG ldquoThe Swiss

Observatory clearly underscores the im-

portance of clippings and media response

as a measurement tool for PR Yet the

survey also confirms our assumption that

the Internet is increasingly gaining

ground when it comes to measuring the

effectiveness of communication inde-

pendent of sectors and companies The gap

between traditional media and Inter-

net Intranet usage is closing We expect

the focus of media monitoring to con-

tinue to shift significantly toward Internet

and digital media in the years to come

The fact that communication impact

is increasingly extending to the digital

sphere allows PR professionals to go

beyond simply measuring communication

output to an ever-greater capacity to

understand the opinions attitudes and

behaviors of their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 33: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3344

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

31Measuring the effectiveness of communication looking beyond output

Stages of evaluation ()

Preparation

ndash Process quality

ndash Personnel costs for

projects

ndash Financial costs for

projects

328

Output

ndash Clippings and media

response

ndash InternetIntranet

usage

702

Impact on

stakeholders

Understanding of

key message

464

Effect onstakeholders

ndash Reputation index

brand value

ndash Stakeholder atti-

tudes and behavior

change

369

Impact on

business

Business goals

281

Looking at the results according to type of company Joint stock companies are

more keen to measure ldquoEffect on stakeholdersrdquo (458 ) whereas Private compa-

nies put less emphasis on it (294 ) In addition Government-owned organiza-tions and Political institutions look closer at the ldquoImpact on businessrdquo (402 )

By further dividing Joint stock and Private companies by sector type it becomes

evident that Telecommunications and Media (333 ) Banking Insurance and

Financial (386 ) and Other (390 ) sectors are less keen to measure ldquoImpact on

stakeholdersrdquo However Telecommunications and Media (375 ) as well as Bank-

ing Insurance and Financial (364 ) sectors along with Other services (385 )

are more inclined than other sectors to measure ldquoImpact on businessrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 34: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3444

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

32 ClientndashAgency relationship

71 Budget changes relatively stable budget

More than half (525 ) of all respondents indicate that their external budget

did not change over the last year Also no significant budget changes are fore-

seen for the next three years [4]

Overall this trend applies to companies of all types and sectors with three

exceptions Respondents from the Professional business services report an

increased budget for 2009 that is 174 percentage points above the average

(385 compared to 211) In the future 632 of communication professionals

in the Chemical Pharmaceutical and Health sector forecast an increase in budget

much above the average of 399 Nonprofit organizations predict a greater

decrease in budget than the majority (282 vs 186 )

72 Outsourcing high demand for editorial graphicaland design work

In addition to the budget trends respondents gave information about Outsourc-

ing and Insourcing activities [5] Since the information was asked in the form of

the means of open-ended questions respondents could name more than one

item Overall more Outsourcing than Insourcing items were mentioned

In regard to Outsourcing the most emerging topic by far is ldquoGraphic design and

Production (Print)rdquo followed by ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work On the

other hand companies insourced primarily ldquoCampaigning Public relationsrdquo ac-

tivities as well as ldquoCorporate publishing Editorialrdquo work and ldquoTechnical support

for multimedia and Internet questionsrdquo

[4] Q 16a (asked to 4 and 5) How did your external budget change over the last year (i e 2009) How do you think it

will evolve in the next 3 years Scale points Increase(d) No change Decrease(d)

[5] Q 16b (asked to 4 and 5) What communication activities have been allocated outside of your organization (out-

sourced) What communication activities used to be performed outside that you returned in-house (insourcing)

(An open-ended question)

Outsourced activities (Counts)

Graphic design Production (Print)

Corporate publishing Editorial

Technical support (Web Film)

Campaigning

Events Fair planning

Translations

Media clippings

Consulting (Branding Com)

International public relations

Mailings

Fundraising

54

50

25

19

13

11

10

9

8

8

1

7 ClientndashAgency relationship

Regula Ruetz ruweba kommunikation ag

and President pr suisse ldquoThe survey clearly

shows that companies outsource graphic

and design work while keeping strategic

and conceptual PR activities in house

Based on these results it can be argued

that the key task of companiesrsquo heads of

communication ndash both today and in the

future ndash is managing corporate position-ing and image This growing competence

allows corporate communication officers

to coordinate and effectively lead the

contributions of external consultants and

agencies called in to support them and

their teams in their different capabilities

The picture is slightly different when

it comes to the multimedia technology

Companies tend to have a more balanced

mix between internal and external sup-

port Internal IT specialists work together

with external experts to develop tech-

nological solutions that tend to becomeincreasingly complexrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 35: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3544

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 36: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3644

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 37: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3744

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

35ClientndashAgency relationship

occurs for ldquoComplement companiesrsquo internal capabilitiesrdquo this reason is men-

tioned by 438 of the Swiss German agency CEOs but only 217 of the Swiss

French agency CEOs

75 Honesty and fairness top the ranking of most appreciatedagency qualities

Companies are highly satisfied with the ldquoHonesty and fairnessrdquo of the agencies

(593 ) Companies also appreciate agenciesrsquo ldquoCreativityrdquo (491) ldquoQuality of

services and products deliveredrdquo (478 ) ldquoBudget reliabilityrdquo (471) and ldquoQuality

of account managementrdquo (456 ) [10]

ldquoResearch capabilitiesrdquo ranks second to last (242 ) while agenciesrsquo and consult-

antsrsquo ldquoInternational capabilitiesrdquo received the lowest score for satisfaction(188 ) This particularly low result seems to vary according to the profession-

alsrsquo reach of activity Respondents from companies that operate worldwide ap-

pear to be more satisfied with this criterion (483 ) than their colleagues work-

ing primarily in Europe (172 ) [11]

[10] Q 15 (asked to 4 and 5) How satisfied are you with public relations agencies and communication consultants

(1 = not at all 5 = very much I donrsquot know) Scale points considered 4ndash5

[11] Respondents working mainly locally and in Switzerland also show a low level of satisfaction concerning the interna-

tional capability of agencies (138 and 207 respectively) However this result may be considered unreliable

(although statistically significant) considering the probable low level of international experience of the respond-

ents

Satisfaction with agencies and consultants ()

Honestly and fairness

Creativity

Quality of services

and products delivered

Budget reliability

Quality of account management

New media expertise

Strategic counseling

Full service capabilities

Research capabilities

International capabilities

593

491

478

471

456

413

358

325

242

188

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 38: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3844

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

36 Professional development

81 Communication professionals have clearly articulatedexpertise needs

In general respondents seem to have quite specific expertise needs Most select

only one or two areas of needs with ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo being selected by 512 of the respondents 135 of respondents sig-

nal that they do not have any needs [1]

A personrsquos educational level generally seems not to influence expertise needs The only exception emerges among respondents who have No educational quali-

fication This group indicates a higher-than-average need for ldquoCommunication

expertiserdquo (583 ) and ldquoManagement of communication tools and channelsrdquo

(833 ) Furthermore no significant differences occur among respondents

according to the type of company or sector in which they operate

Yet some differences emerge when looking at respondentsrsquo reach of professional

activities Although these differences are not big they are significant and refer

in particular to the differences between respondents operating at a Regional

level and those working Worldwide ldquoManagement of communication tools and

channelsrdquo is a bigger topic for regionally active professionals than for those

operating Worldwide (509 vs 448 ) On the contrary respondents from com-panies with Worldwide reach want to gain more knowledge than their regional

colleagues in areas such as ldquoResearch and measurementrdquo (424 vs 329 ) ldquoCom-

munication expertiserdquo (344 vs 295 ) and ldquoGeneral managementrdquo (248 vs

179 )

[1] Q 18 (asked to all) In which areas do you personally need more expertise today Please if possible specify the top-

ics that come to mind in the areas of expertise you have selected (Pick all that apply) For the possible response

options (reasons) see the chart ldquoNeeds in areas of expertiserdquo

Needs in areas of expertise ()

Management of communication

tools and channels

Research and measurement

Communication expertise

Personal skills

General management

I have no needs

512

355

322

287

201

135

8 Professional development

Marion Starck President SPRI ldquoDespite the

growing strategic challenges of commu-

nication and reputation management in an

increasingly complex world the Observa-

tory results surprisingly show the greatest

need for training in the management of

communication instruments and channels

In addition to wanting to deepen their

expertise in disciplines that have not yet

become an exact science such as CSR

PR professionals find their time dominated

by the need to fill a constantly growing

demand for information For educationalinstitutions this represents a challenge

to respond quickly to developing trends

and find the right balance between theo-

retical knowledge and the transmission

of practical know-how Against the back-

ground of a rapidly changing landscape

with the increasing use of social media

and rising concerns about business ethics

communication skills must be further

strengthened to equip companies to

conduct honest dynamic and convincing

dialogues with their stakeholdersrdquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 39: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 3944

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

37Professional development

When respondents specify their needs within the five expertise areas [2] they

mention clearly defined needs In Communication expertise respondents seek

ldquoCSRrdquo ldquoLink between strategy and communicationrdquo and ldquoBrandingrdquo In Manage-

ment of communication tools and activities most respondents named ldquoOnline

media digital communicationrdquo In General management ldquoFinancial manage-

ment and budgetingrdquo is most common whereas for Research and measurement

ldquoEvaluation methodsrdquo rank first Finally in the area of Personal skills ldquoLeader-

shiprdquo and ldquoCoachingrdquo are the most mentioned needs

[2] Communication expertise (Management of communication tools and channels General management Research

measurement Personal skills) was chosen as an area where you currently need more expertise Please if possible

specify the topics that come to mind in this area you have selected

Needs in Communication expertise (Counts)

CSR

Link between strategy

and communication

Branding

Reputation management

Internal communication

Public affairs

Social media Internet

Targeting

Crisis and issue management

CEO Positioning Communication

Sponsoring

43

42

41

28

7

5

5

4

4

4

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 40: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4044

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

38 Professional development

Needs in Management of communication tools and channels (Counts)

Online media

Digital communication

Change and crisis communication

Internal HR communication

Social media

Financial communication

Investor relations

Cross-media

Stakeholder communication

Corporate publishing

146

43

29

25

17

13

6

6

Needs in General management (Counts)

Financial management Budgeting

Resource allocation

Client Agency management

(Communication) Law

Management by objectivesLeadership

Project management

HR topics

28

15

15

13

11 9

9

6

Needs in Research and measurement (Counts)

Evaluation methods

Controlling

Efficiency in monitoring

Measurement

Value creation for customers

(price quality ROI etc)

Trends

90

59

31

9

6

Martin Zahner Managing Partner YJOO

Communications AG and Board Member

BPRA and SPRI ldquoMore enabling less do-

ing The management of tools is one

thing but the ability of professionals to

take on the role of a coach who enables

people in their companies to cope with

communication challenges will be much

more important The traditional internal

and external communication linear plan-

ning will be replaced by a continuous dia-

log process which has to be managed ac-

cording to the situation This requires adeep understanding of company values as

well as a high level of social and profes-

sional expertiseldquo

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 41: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4144

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

39Professional development

Needs in Personal skills (Counts)

Leadership

Coaching

Consulting

Strategic issues

concepts sales knowledge

Writing

Intercultural communication

Media relations

(plus Interview Media training)

Time management

(plus Resources Stress etc)

Project management

Diversity management

(Internal) Conflict

Crisis management

48

41

30

25

17

12

6

6

6

5

4

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 42: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4244

2010 Practice Survey |

copy Swiss Corporate Communication and Public Relations Observatory 2010

40 Professional development

82 Respondents expect practical knowledge benefit from shortcourses and theoretical knowledge from long programs

For Workshops and seminars ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo is the main benefit respond-

ents consider (349 ranked it first) [3] For Certificate courses ldquoTheoretical and

conceptual knowledgerdquo (302 ) and ldquoPractical knowledgerdquo (304 ) are equally

ranked as the most considered For Diploma courses ldquoTheoretical and concep-

tual knowledgerdquo rank as the most important benefit (404 )

Expected educational benefits ()

No significant differences arise between respondents based on their educational

profile except for those who have No educational qualification who more often

look to ldquoUnderstand trends than othersrdquo (417 vs an average 183 )

[3] Q 19 (asked to all) Think about your expectations regarding training programs Please rank the following benefits

you would be looking at when considering ldquoWorkshops and seminarsrdquo rdquoCertificate coursesrdquo rdquoDiploma coursesrdquo

(1 = most considered 4 = least considered) Response items Theoretical and conceptual knowledge Practical know-

ledge Understanding trends influencing corporate communication and public relations (environmental factors)

Access to high-quality network of professionals

Theoretical

and conceptual

knowledge

Practical knowledge

Understanding trends

influencing CC and PR

(environmental factors)

Access to high-

quality network of

professionals

Workshops and seminars 4 164 1 349 2 287 3 201

Certificate courses 1 302 1 304 3 250 4 144

Diploma courses 1 404 2 279 3 183 4 135

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 43: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4344

L a y o u t P r e p r e s

s a n d P r e s s w w w l i n k g r o u p c h

P a p e r X P e r W h i t e F S C

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich

Page 44: Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

8172019 Corporate Communication and Public Relations Practice Monitor 2010

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullcorporate-communication-and-public-relations-practice-monitor-2010 4444

2010 Practice Survey | Demographics42

Swiss Corporate Communication

and Public Relations Observatory

Giuseppe Buffi 13

6900 Lugano

Switzerland

Tel +41 (0)58 666 45 82

francescoluratiusich